Great and fine video. The science has developed so much that nobody understands the whole area of reality. That is why we much believe science. If we had never searched and studied difficult questions and if we had been satisfied with religious answers we would still be living in caves.
I am an atheist and align myself with secularism. This is a view centered on human agency and a reliance on science and reason rather than revelation from a supernatural source to understand the world. I maintain that religion is not a precondition of morality, and object to excessive religious entanglement with education and the state. I emphasize the individual and social potential, as well as the agency of human beings, which I consider the starting point for serious moral and philosophical inquiry. My values are reinforced by advances in science and technology, giving me confidence in my exploration of the world. I focus on human well-being and advocate for human freedom, autonomy, and progress. I view humanity as responsible for the promotion and development of individuals, espouse the equal and inherent dignity of all human beings, and emphasize a concern for humans in relation to the world. We are reasonable beings, and reasoning and the scientific method are means of finding truth. I argue that science and rationality have driven successful developments in various fields while the invocation of supernatural phenomena fails to coherently explain the world. One form of irrational thinking is adducing. I am skeptical of explanations of natural phenomena or diseases that rely on hidden agencies. For people to be autonomous, their beliefs and actions must be the result of their own reasoning. For me, autonomy dignifies each individual; without autonomy, people's humanity is lessened. I also consider human essence to be universal, irrespective of race and social status, diminishing the importance of collective identities and signifying the importance of individuals.
要做好人为自己为别人 而不是为上帝 我觉得这才是更有意义的信念 但是不信教并不是自由精神 自由思考 because modern society (irrespective of religion) is still filled with tons of beliefs, standards, rules, traditions, and people will still be bound by these things even if they are not religious. I would also argue that religious people, on average, may be more likely to do good things, even if it is being held together by religion. It's impossible to measure but this is the impression I get. To be non-religious and be a good person can be hard, to find meaning in life on your own, but that is the kind of person I respect very much and I can't say I'm a truly good person. In an ideal world, we would all be non-religious and still care for one another, even if there is no logical or religious reason to. Lucia you may want to becareful of the term atheist, I believe the official definition is not believing in god or any higher entity. Someone who is atheist is by definition non-religious, but someone who is non-religious is not necessarily atheist. For example, I am a non-religious person who is not sure if there is a god or not, but would like to believe that there is, the official term for this is: agnostic theist. This makes me more of spiritual, non-religious person. This is more about the technical definition, and isn't really the point of the video, just wanted to let you know.
@@LuciaPan Of course, it can be a controversial, sensitive topic so I’m hoping not to offend anyone. As always, thank you for sharing so much about chinese culture 😊
When I first heard the atheist idea that our parents/ancestors created us, I thought for sure it was a joke. Tell me where do I find the plans; the design documentation for creating off spring? A design process that is more easily accomplished in a drunken stupor than in the light of cold reason.
There's no doubt the believing that there is more then yourself has a placebo effect. It gives you the sense that there is a overall purpose. But this is a form of self delusion. Knowingly lying to yourself to hide the fear of not knowing. Confucius: "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance." Accepting reality for what it is, and not for what you want it to be. If you want reality to be, it requires more then just thought, it requires effort. I think the most important thing is diversity of thought. The world would a awful boring place if we all believed the same. I was raised as a Christian, but left at the age of fourteen, because of both philosophical, and scientific conflicts with what I was being taught. So, I have seen both sides of the coin, and come to the conclusion that it is a more honest answer to say: I don't know.
K, listened to the entirety of your vid, well done, but I have a question. With that level of critical thought and the fact the non-religious are less romanced by social conformity, why does the populace stand for a, once again, nearly Maoist-style dictatorial government based on social conformity to the point of severely oppressing or censoring dissent? Is the herd-mentality of state-mandated belief that overpowering? It seems a state god is just replaced by state god complex.
@@LuciaPanI wanna ask you something you said that in China religions are seen as control mechanisms that is why they are seen bad but China is one of the most restrictive and controlling countries in the world do you have an explanation for this?
Thank you madam, my respect for China has increased. Everyone should think like China and Chinese people.
Really wonderful video! It was very informative, and I look forward to watching your future videos!!
Glad to hear that, thank you!
Atheist here.
I enjoyed your video
Glad you like it😊
TY for sharing. Your English is very good.
Great and fine video. The science has developed so much that nobody understands the whole area of reality. That is why we much believe science. If we had never searched and studied difficult questions and if we had been satisfied with religious answers we would still be living in caves.
Great video , I like how objective Chinese culture is. In my opinion , religion separates people , more than it brings together .
I am an atheist and align myself with secularism. This is a view centered on human agency and a reliance on science and reason rather than revelation from a supernatural source to understand the world. I maintain that religion is not a precondition of morality, and object to excessive religious entanglement with education and the state.
I emphasize the individual and social potential, as well as the agency of human beings, which I consider the starting point for serious moral and philosophical inquiry.
My values are reinforced by advances in science and technology, giving me confidence in my exploration of the world. I focus on human well-being and advocate for human freedom, autonomy, and progress. I view humanity as responsible for the promotion and development of individuals, espouse the equal and inherent dignity of all human beings, and emphasize a concern for humans in relation to the world.
We are reasonable beings, and reasoning and the scientific method are means of finding truth. I argue that science and rationality have driven successful developments in various fields while the invocation of supernatural phenomena fails to coherently explain the world. One form of irrational thinking is adducing. I am skeptical of explanations of natural phenomena or diseases that rely on hidden agencies.
For people to be autonomous, their beliefs and actions must be the result of their own reasoning. For me, autonomy dignifies each individual; without autonomy, people's humanity is lessened. I also consider human essence to be universal, irrespective of race and social status, diminishing the importance of collective identities and signifying the importance of individuals.
要做好人为自己为别人 而不是为上帝 我觉得这才是更有意义的信念 但是不信教并不是自由精神 自由思考 because modern society (irrespective of religion) is still filled with tons of beliefs, standards, rules, traditions, and people will still be bound by these things even if they are not religious. I would also argue that religious people, on average, may be more likely to do good things, even if it is being held together by religion. It's impossible to measure but this is the impression I get. To be non-religious and be a good person can be hard, to find meaning in life on your own, but that is the kind of person I respect very much and I can't say I'm a truly good person. In an ideal world, we would all be non-religious and still care for one another, even if there is no logical or religious reason to.
Lucia you may want to becareful of the term atheist, I believe the official definition is not believing in god or any higher entity. Someone who is atheist is by definition non-religious, but someone who is non-religious is not necessarily atheist. For example, I am a non-religious person who is not sure if there is a god or not, but would like to believe that there is, the official term for this is: agnostic theist. This makes me more of spiritual, non-religious person. This is more about the technical definition, and isn't really the point of the video, just wanted to let you know.
Thank you for your sharing! Also thanks for letting me know the differences among the terms🥰
@@LuciaPan Of course, it can be a controversial, sensitive topic so I’m hoping not to offend anyone. As always, thank you for sharing so much about chinese culture 😊
When I first heard the atheist idea that our parents/ancestors created us, I thought for sure it was a joke. Tell me where do I find the plans; the design documentation for creating off spring? A design process that is more easily accomplished in a drunken stupor than in the light of cold reason.
Tell me where is the design documentation that a God created us????
And actually our parents created us Is clearly written in the Science book? Want me to tell you the details?
@@nawabsingh6987 God would not have any need for documentation. Not so with humans.
@@nawabsingh6987 I would like you to tell me the science book that says exactly that: "our parents created us".
There's no doubt the believing that there is more then yourself has a placebo effect. It gives you the sense that there is a overall purpose. But this is a form of self delusion. Knowingly lying to yourself to hide the fear of not knowing. Confucius: "Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance." Accepting reality for what it is, and not for what you want it to be. If you want reality to be, it requires more then just thought, it requires effort.
I think the most important thing is diversity of thought. The world would a awful boring place if we all believed the same.
I was raised as a Christian, but left at the age of fourteen, because of both philosophical, and scientific conflicts with what I was being taught.
So, I have seen both sides of the coin, and come to the conclusion that it is a more honest answer to say: I don't know.
Thank you for your sharing!
K, listened to the entirety of your vid, well done, but I have a question. With that level of critical thought and the fact the non-religious are less romanced by social conformity, why does the populace stand for a, once again, nearly Maoist-style dictatorial government based on social conformity to the point of severely oppressing or censoring dissent? Is the herd-mentality of state-mandated belief that overpowering? It seems a state god is just replaced by state god complex.
Mmmm, thank you for your sharing!
And good question let me think about it 🤔
You really know nothing about China.
@@LuciaPanI wanna ask you something you said that in China religions are seen as control mechanisms that is why they are seen bad but China is one of the most restrictive and controlling countries in the world do you have an explanation for this?
Self Purpose = Self godhood = self damnation!
With the result of “damnation”, you’ve conceded saving your”SELF” as your “PURPOSE”. K, now put the capped words together.
Thank you madam, my respect for China has increased. Everyone should think like China and Chinese people.