Nice discussions here. Andreas. I'm wondering about the part where someone said something like "the me is like an overlay." I've been saying the same thing today. You responded with a yes, but that it is too simplistic of an idea. Wondering what you mean by it being too simple. It seems like the the natural way of being is that there is no one, and that the owning, and the identifying, and all the other mind-like stuff IS very much like an overlay.
The apparent timeless wonder is just talking happening without conflict. Talking is for no one. Talking can only be apparently interesting for apparent me's. Apparent me's can only hear what the timeless wonder is saying as concepts that create apparent conflict. Thanks Andreas
Has making-sense been so reliable and useful, that it makes sense to want infinitely more of it? Is there any final reason, not dependent on yet another reason? Rely on 'because', without first investigating whether to 'be' has a 'cause'? Can physics explain the mechanism called 'having'? What happens when there’s no need? Not even for a next moment?
So , on the other hand, if a thing or a person or whatever, was in fact Real with a capital R, it would be because he/she/it would be everlasting and everconcious?
Regarding to radical nonduality everything is just an appearance / not real / not solid, including the world, and daydreaming as well, daydreaming feels empty even when one feels still as a person. Only thing that’s illusory, which means is not there at all, is the sense of self / the Me. Illusion and appearance are two different things in radical nonduality. Unfortunately all that is just an assumption which is by the speakers presented as a fact, and they describe this based on how reality seems to appear after what they call the energetic shift ( which may be just brainwashing effect due to constant reassurance and repetition of that everything is one ). Ultimately there is no way of knowing if what they are describing is the real nature of reality or just a mixture of assumptions (which are only partially backed by science) , and brainwashing one self in to conviction , (with experiential symptoms) that everything is one. I wouldn’t even mind if this would be just a brainwashing technique , if there would be some lasting positive effects like mental peace, etc. , why not, nothings wrong with that 🤷🏼♂️. But unfortunately it doesn’t seem like it, as I noticed, many of the speakers out there seem quite neurotic, especially if you disagree with them 😂, ( I am not talking about Andreas now ). But that really doesn’t make any sense 🤷🏼♂️, considering as they say, that they don’t see another person anywhere but just an aliveness/ energy/ unconditional love. It’s like you / regular person, being mad at the wind for blowing, and being obviously upset about that 😂, so it seems that they still perceive others as separate, with free will and choice, who shouldn’t be disagreeing with them. Don’t get fooled. Good luck.
@@laisa. yeah, many people who are not comprehending this correctly are speaking about it, and creating lots of confusion among others. I wouldn’t listen to anyone who says that this can’t be understood, while in the same time is explaining what is this about 😂.
@@mementomori5374 you are welcome 👍. I would recommend everyone to use their own rational thinking, before believing everything that these radical nonduality speakers say.
Thanks! ⚡️💥🔥
Thank you🙂
Thanks ❤
Gorgeous💜
Yes, Unlimited choices being made by No One. 😊
self tries to make the wholeness/absolute relative
love that❤
Thanks Andreas....an enigma indeed. Fizzy pop going on here😮❤
andreas you are so funny!
everything is equally real and unreal……
Wow !!!
Nice discussions here. Andreas. I'm wondering about the part where someone said something like "the me is like an overlay." I've been saying the same thing today. You responded with a yes, but that it is too simplistic of an idea. Wondering what you mean by it being too simple. It seems like the the natural way of being is that there is no one, and that the owning, and the identifying, and all the other mind-like stuff IS very much like an overlay.
The apparent timeless wonder is just talking happening without conflict. Talking is for no one. Talking can only be apparently interesting for apparent me's. Apparent me's can only hear what the timeless wonder is saying as concepts that create apparent conflict. Thanks Andreas
What are apparent me’s?
@@JJ_Khailha people that ask questions
That can happen too
Could be. Seemingly.
Unless it all stops
Has making-sense been so reliable and useful, that it makes sense to want infinitely more of it?
Is there any final reason, not dependent on yet another reason?
Rely on 'because', without first investigating whether to 'be' has a 'cause'?
Can physics explain the mechanism called 'having'?
What happens when there’s no need? Not even for a next moment?
whatever seems to happen…..
Can I ask you something here ? Or how/where can I do it ? Thanks
Hello from Mexico
Darling...........🥰
🤠🇩🇪👌🏼
So , on the other hand, if a thing or a person or whatever, was in fact Real with a capital R, it would be because he/she/it would be everlasting and everconcious?
So this whole ‘reality’ the world the natural world is empty ?
Its illusory? Or do you guys mean the daydreaming is empty
Regarding to radical nonduality everything is just an appearance / not real / not solid, including the world, and daydreaming as well, daydreaming feels empty even when one feels still as a person. Only thing that’s illusory, which means is not there at all, is the sense of self / the Me. Illusion and appearance are two different things in radical nonduality. Unfortunately all that is just an assumption which is by the speakers presented as a fact, and they describe this based on how reality seems to appear after what they call the energetic shift ( which may be just brainwashing effect due to constant reassurance and repetition of that everything is one ). Ultimately there is no way of knowing if what they are describing is the real nature of reality or just a mixture of assumptions (which are only partially backed by science) , and brainwashing one self in to conviction , (with experiential symptoms) that everything is one.
I wouldn’t even mind if this would be just a brainwashing technique , if there would be some lasting positive effects like mental peace, etc. , why not, nothings wrong with that 🤷🏼♂️. But unfortunately it doesn’t seem like it, as I noticed, many of the speakers out there seem quite neurotic, especially if you disagree with them 😂, ( I am not talking about Andreas now ).
But that really doesn’t make any sense 🤷🏼♂️, considering as they say, that they don’t see another person anywhere but just an aliveness/ energy/ unconditional love. It’s like you / regular person, being mad at the wind for blowing, and being obviously upset about that 😂, so it seems that they still perceive others as separate, with free will and choice, who shouldn’t be disagreeing with them. Don’t get fooled. Good luck.
@ccr7712 yeah the last sentence is a funny thing I've noticed! But that's only what appears to happen anyway 😂
@@ccr7712 mmmm i enjoyed reading your response but i don’t know what to think about it but thanks anyway 🙏❤️
@@laisa. yeah, many people who are not comprehending this correctly are speaking about it, and creating lots of confusion among others. I wouldn’t listen to anyone who says that this can’t be understood, while in the same time is explaining what is this about 😂.
@@mementomori5374 you are welcome 👍. I would recommend everyone to use their own rational thinking, before believing everything that these radical nonduality speakers say.