These comparisons are so awesome... Thanks. Justis are still my favorite 😂, I ski them almost always... I am 175/ 69kg. I usually ski justis in 171, for less effort in steeps/bumps etc, but still strong enough for fun carving and good damping /vibration on rough, still quite good float in powder up to 15-20cm. Also have the 177 justis for more groomer days. The 177 is just like a crazy fast missile carving, you push through everything and never lose an edge. So fun 😂!
I’m still riding a pair of 2017 Kastle FX95 HPs. 189s. Still going strong. A true testament to their build quality. I mounted Pivots on them and they get noticed to this day. Lots of fist bumps. Since then I’ve added a pair of ZX100s 189. And some Volkl Deacon 72s. 178s. Love all my gear; I’m set up for any conditions in Oregon. But kind of jonesing to replace the FX95s. Those Paragons are beautiful! Thinking maybe those or some Declivity X 102s for diversity. Matt did a really good job but it’s clear Bob misses his best bud Jeff.
I’m a former ski racer who now works in a ski in shop Aspen Colorado and our blizzard rep gave me a pair of 192 anomaly 102s as my daily driver, and I fell in love with the ski because to me it just felt like an all mountain race ski
@@mattclark1278 I agree with Matt and Bob that the anomaly has a bit more pop to then the mantra on trail in Aspen we have a lot of steeper glated skiing, where the mantra would like to get sideways and slide around a bit more. Where as the anomaly, felt a little bit more comfortable, charging, and bouncing off the top of terrain
Currently skiing a Rossi Sender 94ti in 178 and love it but wish it was a little wider for deeper snow for typical trips to CO and Utah. I’d like something that would work well in tight trees and still be able to rip groomers at very high speeds. Would the Declivity X 102 or the Sender Soul 102 be a better fit?
Both will be a better fit, but I thought the new Declivity X was an exceptional ski at this width and for mixing on and off-trail performance. The Soul 102 was surprisingly good, but the Armada is a special ski.
Will be on the road most of this winter, starting the season in the East Coast, Utah in February. I'm not sure where next, but will be on snow. I can only pack one pair of skis, and I have to choose between an Atris (190, 105 underfoot) and a Declivity 102 Ti (188). Which one are you packing?
honestly, I'd recommend getting a double ski skibag and pack a 90-100 for the east and 110+ for utah. As the biggest struggle for ski is the length, the double bag takes up almost the same amount of room as a single bag. And for a place like utah where the heavenly fresh snow is, you'd want a proper pow ski. If you had to choose from the two, the Atris is probably better as it will get you a lot more float on powder.
Declivity, as I think it's better overall in a variety of conditions and terrain. It's a good enough floater to meet the needs of a pow day, and it's a considerably better on-trail ski than Atris in my experience.
I demoed a number of skis last season and fell in love with the Rustler 10’s. At 60yrs old 6’2” 240# my hard charging day are behind me. Interested in Paragon 101, Sender Soul 102 and maybe the Justice. Interested in thoughts
I'm an enormous Justis fan as it pairs a modern and progressive shape with a very strong and energetic build. You can carve great on them while the rocker is ample enough for soft snow performance and smeary/playful skiing. Rustler does that as well, just not quite in the same level of energy or power. Paragon is more directional than either, with a flatter tail but a floaty and surfy shovel. When engaged on the edges, the Paragon is a very smooth and predictable performer. Soul 102 feels more peppy and zesty than the other skis on your list, just without the high performance ceiling.
@@chopper123abc There's a ton of skis in this range, it's an enormously popular category. I'd add Nordica Enforcer 99 and Dynastar M-Pro 99 to that list if you want some more options to research.
I am probably going to make a lot more comments on the DPS, Kastle, Stockli and Nordica and Volkl but I have to say something about Rossi.. If you can ski the conditions that you skied with that ski it says a lot about the ski.. Those conditions would classify as crud to me and if you can ski crud you can ski anything in my book.. Floaty skis can get bounced around in crud and sinky skis can get stuck in the crud.. I have the 2021 DPS Wailer Foundation 100 RP x 184.. As far as shaping.. The only thing that looks different from Wailer 100 and Kaisen 100 is that the Foundation seams thicker under the foot.. It might be thicker throughout.. It still has a ton of camber.. I am guessing that it takes a little more work to get on and off the edge.. Something you guys did not mention was that you have to stay forward on the skis.. If you are upright or back the tails will catch and spin you around.. The interesting thing is that early season when there are a ton of people on the hill I will either bring my 25 year old race skis to be able to do quick turns or my RP.. I might even try working on rolling from edge to edge rather than my race style of lifting edge to edge.. Might keep me from wearing out so quick.. I would probably be ok with either of those Kastle skis.. There might be a maximum speed on the ZX but a minimum speed for the Paragon.. I have Stockli Stormrider 88s and 105.. Both of those skis have a minimum speed... I would say that once you get them up to about 40 mph they really come alive.. What I really like about these skis is the dampening.. When I get up to speed they really hold to the snow well.. My 105s can slice like you would not believe.. Once they are slower than 25 it really gets hard to turn them.. They are too stuck to the snow.. 95s did seam to be able to turn a little better at slower speeds.. The only Enforcer I have is the 104 Free and I ski it at the 179 length.. Overconfident is the word that I use to describe this ski.. The ski will go through anything.. It is just a question if I can.. I have talked to people on 100s and 94s and maybe even 88s and they say the same thing.. I only ski a half of a day and it is good for me for that.. Later in the season if I am in really good shape I might ski more runs with the ski and it takes it all and wants more.. I just have to make sure that my body can handle it all.. A couple years ago I demoed the Volkl Mantra 102.. I agree with everything you said.. I will add that when I skied it flat it would pivot instantly.. And when skiing it flat it did not matter if the crud was soft or hard that instant pivot was quite rewarding.. Peak 10 the snow was all slushy with ice underneath and it did well on that and when I went up to the bowls and they were all washboard they pivoted really nice in and out of the washboard.. I don't like skiing washboard at all and those skis saved me from a lot of grief.. Then I went over to another bowl and that bowl was thick slushy chunky ice crud and the ski literally saved me again... Sometimes it is not about doing laps but sometimes getting down the hill safely.. It was nice to see Matt and Bob do one.. I would say that my skiing style is closer to theirs.. I am not as tall as them but I weigh about what they do.. I can really relate to both of them.. I am older than both of them so when Bob talks about getting lazy I can totally relate..
I'm an advanced skier but pretty lightweight 6'1" 170lbs and just got myself new boots (Lange XT3 Free 130s) and am stoked to get some new sticks, but am finding the selection pretty overwhelming. I think I've settled at a Ranger 96 for an east coast daily driver but would like some advice on the uphill side. I have a pair of shifts and am thinking about the Elan ripstick 102 for a pow/uphill ski? Would love thoughts/opinions/ ramblings!
Sounds good to me! Ranger is very versatile and well-rounded for all-mountain skiing. Ripstick with a Shift makes good sense for soft snow and uphill days for sure. If you're looking for me to talk you out of it, then I'd take a Salomon Stance 96 for eastern daily and then a Head Kore 105 for pow/uphill.
It's good to see you guys have a deep bench and you can bring Matt in, when Jeff needs a breather. Well done! I love this group of skis. My favorite skis in my quiver are the 2023 Volkl Mantra 102. How do they compare with the 2025 Mantra 102?
Another great video with a lot of information! I'm currently have some 2019 Fischer Ranger 102's FR's in a 177cm that I use as my one ski quiver at Snowbird UT. I'm a 155 lbs 5'11" advanced skier, have been skiing for 30+ years. I have really enjoyed the Rangers but looking for a ski that can handle crud a little better at high speed and a little more stable on high speed groomers, still needs to perform on those 12"+ powder days. What would you recommend and what length? I'm currently considering the Enforcer 99 in a 179 or 185, Declivity X 102 in a 180, Mantra M7 in a 177 or 184 and finally the Mantra 102 in a 177 or 184. THANKS!
You're in the right zone here as all of those skis will do most of what you're looking for. I'd say the Declivity X 102 is your best floater, but it's also going to be more similar to your Ranger in terms of crud and stability. If you're looking for a mix, I think Enforcer 99 is an awesome option. The Mantras aren't quite as floaty as the Nordica, and while they may operate better in a carving format, I do think the Enforcer is the most useful here on your list. I'd say 179 is the length here for your stats and application.
He did great! You have to have a lot of experience with skis over years to be able to do this and remember a ton of details. I'm not shocked though, he's chimed in before at times in previous videos. He get's it.
I am 6ft 1 ~215, last year I got black crow serpos at 180. They were a little chattery at speed, think I should try to find something longer or get lessons early this season?
Sizing sounds mainly appropriate. I always like to ask if the boot fit and flex aligns with the ski and skier in these situations as the Serpo is a relatively stable ski at speed. Also, yes longer skis will be smoother, but are you giving up other aspects in order to get only a lack of chatter?
@@SkiEssentials I’m in a pair of Cochise 130’s, been skiing for a long while and never really had an issue keeping edge through turns. started to doubt technique after ordering and using serpos last season, but after watching y’all’s content was wondering if I went too short
Hiya, 6"3 200lbs high intermediate/advanced skier, currently on 2025 blizzard r9 @186. Looking for a wider powder-oriented ski for this season in interior BC with decent snowfall, something I can take back to New Zealand and be fine in heavier/chopped snow. Looking at the Armada Declivity X/Ti 108, scared of it being too much ski for me, especially at the ~190? Any thoughts? alternatives?
I skied the X 108 this past season in a snowy day and loved it. It's a straighter cut than it used to be so prefers a more aggressive take on the fall line. That said, it's about as smooth and predictable as it gets. On the more playful side but still sturdy, check out the Nordica Unleashed 108--a better turning ski than the Declivity and you can go 186 in that ski.
Love the Kastle Paragon feedback. Matt's favorite from his enthusiasm. It's quite left of the mantra/enforcer do those skis really have that much more top end?
Yes, mainly due to the Paragon's shovel shape and profile--it's designed more for softer snow but with a sturdier build. Paragon has a thinner core profile as well, making it more flexible and approachable.
the justis has been on my list as an every day ski was looking for 177 bc of build could it be justifiable to go down to 171 at 5’8 210 i ski a ripstick 96 black 180 and m free 108 182 now and am very happy
My opinion is no, I currently have daylied a Justus for two seasons now and I got a 177. I’m 6’0 and 225. I am a hard charging skier, and I can absolutely over ski the 177 and I regretted not getting the 184. The 177 are plenty strong , but I feel like I have to balance on them. On edge/linking carves they are fantastic bc of the lack of early taper, but I can over leverage them from a fore/aft perspective at bigger edge angles and higher speeds 40+ bc I just don’t have enough length. When I ski them flat in bumps or slush or pow, I feel like my center sweet spot is too small for my height. When I am in the sweet spot they again are amazing exactly what I wanted from them, but i really have to concentrate on staying there, and I find that more difficult in more technical terrain. I love these skis and picked up a pair of 184s for this season recently exactly bc I was originally hesitant sizing up from where I normally ski a 180 when I bought these 2 seasons ago. Highly recommend these skis they have are exactly what I wanted I just didn’t give myself enough room for type of skiing I like to do, just don’t size down like I did. I would go 177 for your height and if your used to skiing 180s.
@@NibbleSnarphthanks awesome break down i felt exactly the same way about it especially with the amount of rocker but sometimes how things are portrayed and that core thickness makes me double take on the situation lol
I’ve been skiing the justis 184 every day the past two seasons. 6’1” 170lbs. Definitely wouldn’t want to downsize. They rip through tight bumps and trees if you stay on top of ‘em. Super fun at Crested Butte.
@@troubadour1783 ok awesome thank you yea im not going to definitely going to go with 177 here on the east narrow skis arent for me learned that last season this has been the top of my list two years now its time
3rd vote for the 184. I'm 6' 200lb and ski the 184. It is not an overpowering ski whatsoever. It's the most fun ski I own. I certainly wouldn't want to size down. Just because it has 2 sheets of TI in it, doesn't mean it's for a bigger skier and should be sized down. They're substantially lighter than your M Free 108s. It's just stiffer so you'll need to stay more active on the Justice
Head Core 105 to my surprise has become my go to one quiver ......... I'm 6 ft 190 very young 59 athlete - race background........ side country, trees are my passion in Tahoe, / Canada thinking about Nordica unleash any opinions out there???
So many skiers are surprised by the Kore--I love it! Unleashed flexes better than the Kore, delivering a smoother and rounder turn, especially impressive from a twin tip.
How would you separate Declivity 102x, 102ti and Justis? 6'4 200 pounds, something for Japan as a true allrounder. Groomers, chopped up afternoons, bit of deep powder but have others for the true bottomless mornings. Also sizing, do they get too gnarly in the biggest sizes of each? Or with the Justis having so much rocker can you go long for float but without the contact length getting too long?
I think the X 102 and the Justis are two of the best and most complete skis for 2025. The Justis is a bit better of a turner, but it does come at the cost of stiffness and noisiness. The X 102 is smoother and quieter, especially vs. the 102 Ti from last year. I find it hard to argue against the Justis, but the X 102 may put up a good fight. I don't think the Declivity in the 188 is nearly as burly as the Justis in the 189. I'm 6/2 225 and love the Justis in the 183 but would get Declivity in the 188.
@@SkiEssentials Thanks, really appreciate the reply! Should have mentioned, last season i took blade optic 104 185cm, like it but made me think i wanted more support up front and something a bit more directional. Should i throw Sender 104ti in the mix? Maybe fx106ti. (realise they arent in this test)
Moment skis are more western skiing oriented for one. I know they skip some brands because they don't like them. Not saying that's true in this case but I've heard them say as much about others in the past.
We are not a Moment retailer. The skis we sell take priority from a content creation perspective. If we have the time and access, we'd love to get on more skis, and Moment has been consistently at the tip of the priority list.
I'm more of a Wailer 100 skier than a Kaizen. I like the thicker core profile and more woody feel with some of the carbon zip. The Kaizen is very precise and you do have to be more engaged--I like to be lazy from time to time making the Wailer a better choice for me.
I’m 40yr 6ft 210lbs advanced/ expert athletic skier. Currently I own Volkl kendo in 184cm and elan ripstick 96 black in 188cm; which I love both. I ski mostly Vermont and New Hampshire. I’m looking for suggestions on sizing for the black crows Justice.
As much as I'm impressed with the Rustler's ability to handle a variety of conditions, terrain, and speeds, I'm even more so with the X 102. Personally, I'd much rather ski the smoother, quieter, and more cohesive Armada, but that's by no way meaning the Rustler is a bad ski. I simply prefer the more silent and damp Declivity--it's a very impressive new ski. It's flatter for sure, so that's the main difference while the Rustler has a whole lot of tip splay and tail rocker.
@@nzheliking1278 That was our experience--it's kind of a balancing or give/take on their part, but the ski now feels more adept at softer snow and creativity vs. the old 102 Ti that was an excellent groomer carver and crud buster, but not as amenable to playfulness and soft snow fun.
@@SkiEssentials sounds like a great ski. Sort of like a damper smoother rustler 10 when the snow gets nasty? Which is the only thing I really thought the rustler lacked at times.
Justis kind of crushes Radian in the performance department. It's also got a very innovative, progressive, and modern profile to it that allows it to be surfy and carvy. The Radian isn't as multi-dimensional, but is still a lot of fun.
How does the Zx100 189 do in the trees? I'm worried the 181 is a bit small at 6'2" 180. But the 189 may be unweildy. Also considering just stepping up to the zx115 in the 186.
You don't want to meet in the middle with the ZX 108? I've never skied any ZX ski in the 189, and at 6/2 225, I think that'd be the length to have in any of the ZX skis as I have found the 181 to be on the short side.
@@SkiEssentials Reading the blister flash review of the 108 vs 115, it sounded like the 108 didnt have the same magic that the 100 and 115 had. Not sure how that relates to your experience.
@@Whim396 Way different skis for sure vs. the older SFB. Different audience. New Bacon is very similar to the Chronic 101 and 94 just wider and more rockered. Not a lot of zip in any of them, but a very smooth and cohesive feel overall.
Unless you're a jaw-clenching skier looking for endless power and stability, I'd go with the Declivity. It's friendlier and still incredibly smooth and stable.
90-100mm skis are too popular in North America, their suppliers probably don't want them to cut corners in these categories, idk. I'd prefer them putting more emphasis on the comparisons videos than the individual ski reviews.
I like when they do all the skis in the category. Otherwise your always wondering how the ski does that's not in it and multiple people are always responding what about certain skis that were not in the video.
That's not how their reviews work. They aren't about "These are the ten best ski's blah, blah, blah". What they are trying to do is highlight the differences between different skis so skiers can pick which skis best suit their applications. For you, you could narrow things down by focusing on whatever end of the wall appeals to you. This comparison was organized slarvyiest to most straight line speed oriented.
Glad Matt made his way into the comparisons, love his insight and opinions on the skis!
Agree! His size and skiing style match perfectly with these part 2 skis.
These comparisons are so awesome... Thanks. Justis are still my favorite 😂, I ski them almost always... I am 175/ 69kg. I usually ski justis in 171, for less effort in steeps/bumps etc, but still strong enough for fun carving and good damping /vibration on rough, still quite good float in powder up to 15-20cm. Also have the 177 justis for more groomer days. The 177 is just like a crazy fast missile carving, you push through everything and never lose an edge. So fun 😂!
I’m still riding a pair of 2017 Kastle FX95 HPs. 189s. Still going strong. A true testament to their build quality. I mounted Pivots on them and they get noticed to this day. Lots of fist bumps. Since then I’ve added a pair of ZX100s 189. And some Volkl Deacon 72s. 178s. Love all my gear; I’m set up for any conditions in Oregon. But kind of jonesing to replace the FX95s. Those Paragons are beautiful! Thinking maybe those or some Declivity X 102s for diversity.
Matt did a really good job but it’s clear Bob misses his best bud Jeff.
Me waiting patiently for the 80-90mm ski comparison and 70-80 comparison.
We'll do one wider one and then check back to the narrower skis.
@@SkiEssentials don’t worry I’ll watch everyone of these either way LOL
@@SkiEssentialsdoes that mean we get another powder ski comparison this year ?🤟🏻
I’m a former ski racer who now works in a ski in shop Aspen Colorado and our blizzard rep gave me a pair of 192 anomaly 102s as my daily driver, and I fell in love with the ski because to me it just felt like an all mountain race ski
If you've tried the new Mantra - how does it compare?
@@mattclark1278 I agree with Matt and Bob that the anomaly has a bit more pop to then the mantra on trail in Aspen we have a lot of steeper glated skiing, where the mantra would like to get sideways and slide around a bit more. Where as the anomaly, felt a little bit more comfortable, charging, and bouncing off the top of terrain
Currently skiing a Rossi Sender 94ti in 178 and love it but wish it was a little wider for deeper snow for typical trips to CO and Utah. I’d like something that would work well in tight trees and still be able to rip groomers at very high speeds. Would the Declivity X 102 or the Sender Soul 102 be a better fit?
Both will be a better fit, but I thought the new Declivity X was an exceptional ski at this width and for mixing on and off-trail performance. The Soul 102 was surprisingly good, but the Armada is a special ski.
Will be on the road most of this winter, starting the season in the East Coast, Utah in February. I'm not sure where next, but will be on snow. I can only pack one pair of skis, and I have to choose between an Atris (190, 105 underfoot) and a Declivity 102 Ti (188). Which one are you packing?
honestly, I'd recommend getting a double ski skibag and pack a 90-100 for the east and 110+ for utah. As the biggest struggle for ski is the length, the double bag takes up almost the same amount of room as a single bag. And for a place like utah where the heavenly fresh snow is, you'd want a proper pow ski. If you had to choose from the two, the Atris is probably better as it will get you a lot more float on powder.
Declivity, as I think it's better overall in a variety of conditions and terrain. It's a good enough floater to meet the needs of a pow day, and it's a considerably better on-trail ski than Atris in my experience.
I demoed a number of skis last season and fell in love with the Rustler 10’s. At 60yrs old 6’2” 240# my hard charging day are behind me. Interested in Paragon 101, Sender Soul 102 and maybe the Justice. Interested in thoughts
I'm an enormous Justis fan as it pairs a modern and progressive shape with a very strong and energetic build. You can carve great on them while the rocker is ample enough for soft snow performance and smeary/playful skiing. Rustler does that as well, just not quite in the same level of energy or power. Paragon is more directional than either, with a flatter tail but a floaty and surfy shovel. When engaged on the edges, the Paragon is a very smooth and predictable performer. Soul 102 feels more peppy and zesty than the other skis on your list, just without the high performance ceiling.
@@SkiEssentials Looks like the Justice moved up the list. Thanks for that info. Any other ski you would recommend not mentioned?
@@chopper123abc There's a ton of skis in this range, it's an enormously popular category. I'd add Nordica Enforcer 99 and Dynastar M-Pro 99 to that list if you want some more options to research.
@@SkiEssentials I had a blast on the 100’s last season. My only concern is the weight.
I am probably going to make a lot more comments on the DPS, Kastle, Stockli and Nordica and Volkl but I have to say something about Rossi.. If you can ski the conditions that you skied with that ski it says a lot about the ski.. Those conditions would classify as crud to me and if you can ski crud you can ski anything in my book.. Floaty skis can get bounced around in crud and sinky skis can get stuck in the crud..
I have the 2021 DPS Wailer Foundation 100 RP x 184.. As far as shaping.. The only thing that looks different from Wailer 100 and Kaisen 100 is that the Foundation seams thicker under the foot.. It might be thicker throughout.. It still has a ton of camber.. I am guessing that it takes a little more work to get on and off the edge.. Something you guys did not mention was that you have to stay forward on the skis.. If you are upright or back the tails will catch and spin you around.. The interesting thing is that early season when there are a ton of people on the hill I will either bring my 25 year old race skis to be able to do quick turns or my RP.. I might even try working on rolling from edge to edge rather than my race style of lifting edge to edge.. Might keep me from wearing out so quick..
I would probably be ok with either of those Kastle skis.. There might be a maximum speed on the ZX but a minimum speed for the Paragon..
I have Stockli Stormrider 88s and 105.. Both of those skis have a minimum speed... I would say that once you get them up to about 40 mph they really come alive.. What I really like about these skis is the dampening.. When I get up to speed they really hold to the snow well.. My 105s can slice like you would not believe.. Once they are slower than 25 it really gets hard to turn them.. They are too stuck to the snow.. 95s did seam to be able to turn a little better at slower speeds..
The only Enforcer I have is the 104 Free and I ski it at the 179 length.. Overconfident is the word that I use to describe this ski.. The ski will go through anything.. It is just a question if I can.. I have talked to people on 100s and 94s and maybe even 88s and they say the same thing.. I only ski a half of a day and it is good for me for that.. Later in the season if I am in really good shape I might ski more runs with the ski and it takes it all and wants more.. I just have to make sure that my body can handle it all..
A couple years ago I demoed the Volkl Mantra 102.. I agree with everything you said.. I will add that when I skied it flat it would pivot instantly.. And when skiing it flat it did not matter if the crud was soft or hard that instant pivot was quite rewarding.. Peak 10 the snow was all slushy with ice underneath and it did well on that and when I went up to the bowls and they were all washboard they pivoted really nice in and out of the washboard.. I don't like skiing washboard at all and those skis saved me from a lot of grief.. Then I went over to another bowl and that bowl was thick slushy chunky ice crud and the ski literally saved me again... Sometimes it is not about doing laps but sometimes getting down the hill safely..
It was nice to see Matt and Bob do one.. I would say that my skiing style is closer to theirs.. I am not as tall as them but I weigh about what they do.. I can really relate to both of them.. I am older than both of them so when Bob talks about getting lazy I can totally relate..
I'm an advanced skier but pretty lightweight 6'1" 170lbs and just got myself new boots (Lange XT3 Free 130s) and am stoked to get some new sticks, but am finding the selection pretty overwhelming. I think I've settled at a Ranger 96 for an east coast daily driver but would like some advice on the uphill side. I have a pair of shifts and am thinking about the Elan ripstick 102 for a pow/uphill ski? Would love thoughts/opinions/ ramblings!
Sounds good to me! Ranger is very versatile and well-rounded for all-mountain skiing. Ripstick with a Shift makes good sense for soft snow and uphill days for sure. If you're looking for me to talk you out of it, then I'd take a Salomon Stance 96 for eastern daily and then a Head Kore 105 for pow/uphill.
I can't wait to get on my
Declivity X 102's this year!
It's a very special new ski for sure!
spotted matt enjoying late's on ed masters
It's good to see you guys have a deep bench and you can bring Matt in, when Jeff needs a breather. Well done! I love this group of skis. My favorite skis in my quiver are the 2023 Volkl Mantra 102. How do they compare with the 2025 Mantra 102?
Same ski, different graphic. The guess is that the 102 will get the M7 updates for 2026, although that's speculation on our end at this point.
Airtail😂, go Matt! Great work as always
Another great video with a lot of information! I'm currently have some 2019 Fischer Ranger 102's FR's in a 177cm that I use as my one ski quiver at Snowbird UT. I'm a 155 lbs 5'11" advanced skier, have been skiing for 30+ years. I have really enjoyed the Rangers but looking for a ski that can handle crud a little better at high speed and a little more stable on high speed groomers, still needs to perform on those 12"+ powder days. What would you recommend and what length? I'm currently considering the Enforcer 99 in a 179 or 185, Declivity X 102 in a 180, Mantra M7 in a 177 or 184 and finally the Mantra 102 in a 177 or 184. THANKS!
You're in the right zone here as all of those skis will do most of what you're looking for. I'd say the Declivity X 102 is your best floater, but it's also going to be more similar to your Ranger in terms of crud and stability. If you're looking for a mix, I think Enforcer 99 is an awesome option. The Mantras aren't quite as floaty as the Nordica, and while they may operate better in a carving format, I do think the Enforcer is the most useful here on your list. I'd say 179 is the length here for your stats and application.
@@SkiEssentials Thank you so much for the nice reply and recommendation.
Matt is very good at this I'm surprised.
He did great! You have to have a lot of experience with skis over years to be able to do this and remember a ton of details. I'm not shocked though, he's chimed in before at times in previous videos. He get's it.
I am 6ft 1 ~215, last year I got black crow serpos at 180. They were a little chattery at speed, think I should try to find something longer or get lessons early this season?
Sizing sounds mainly appropriate. I always like to ask if the boot fit and flex aligns with the ski and skier in these situations as the Serpo is a relatively stable ski at speed. Also, yes longer skis will be smoother, but are you giving up other aspects in order to get only a lack of chatter?
@@SkiEssentials I’m in a pair of Cochise 130’s, been skiing for a long while and never really had an issue keeping edge through turns. started to doubt technique after ordering and using serpos last season, but after watching y’all’s content was wondering if I went too short
question: which binding u will put on the new bent 100? for all mountain. look pivot 15?
No problems at all with the Pivot 15 in the 95 brake. I'd also say the Strive 16 works great on this ski.
Hiya, 6"3 200lbs high intermediate/advanced skier, currently on 2025 blizzard r9 @186. Looking for a wider powder-oriented ski for this season in interior BC with decent snowfall, something I can take back to New Zealand and be fine in heavier/chopped snow. Looking at the Armada Declivity X/Ti 108, scared of it being too much ski for me, especially at the ~190? Any thoughts? alternatives?
I skied the X 108 this past season in a snowy day and loved it. It's a straighter cut than it used to be so prefers a more aggressive take on the fall line. That said, it's about as smooth and predictable as it gets. On the more playful side but still sturdy, check out the Nordica Unleashed 108--a better turning ski than the Declivity and you can go 186 in that ski.
Love the Kastle Paragon feedback. Matt's favorite from his enthusiasm. It's quite left of the mantra/enforcer do those skis really have that much more top end?
Yes, mainly due to the Paragon's shovel shape and profile--it's designed more for softer snow but with a sturdier build. Paragon has a thinner core profile as well, making it more flexible and approachable.
the justis has been on my list as an every day ski was looking for 177 bc of build could it be justifiable to go down to 171 at 5’8 210 i ski a ripstick 96 black 180 and m free 108 182 now and am very happy
My opinion is no, I currently have daylied a Justus for two seasons now and I got a 177. I’m 6’0 and 225.
I am a hard charging skier, and I can absolutely over ski the 177 and I regretted not getting the 184. The 177 are plenty strong , but I feel like I have to balance on them.
On edge/linking carves they are fantastic bc of the lack of early taper, but I can over leverage them from a fore/aft perspective at bigger edge angles and higher speeds 40+ bc I just don’t have enough length.
When I ski them flat in bumps or slush or pow, I feel like my center sweet spot is too small for my height. When I am in the sweet spot they again are amazing exactly what I wanted from them, but i really have to concentrate on staying there, and I find that more difficult in more technical terrain.
I love these skis and picked up a pair of 184s for this season recently exactly bc I was originally hesitant sizing up from where I normally ski a 180 when I bought these 2 seasons ago.
Highly recommend these skis they have are exactly what I wanted I just didn’t give myself enough room for type of skiing I like to do, just don’t size down like I did.
I would go 177 for your height and if your used to skiing 180s.
@@NibbleSnarphthanks awesome break down i felt exactly the same way about it especially with the amount of rocker but sometimes how things are portrayed and that core thickness makes me double take on the situation lol
I’ve been skiing the justis 184 every day the past two seasons. 6’1” 170lbs. Definitely wouldn’t want to downsize. They rip through tight bumps and trees if you stay on top of ‘em. Super fun at Crested Butte.
@@troubadour1783 ok awesome thank you yea im not going to definitely going to go with 177 here on the east narrow skis arent for me learned that last season this has been the top of my list two years now its time
3rd vote for the 184. I'm 6' 200lb and ski the 184. It is not an overpowering ski whatsoever. It's the most fun ski I own. I certainly wouldn't want to size down. Just because it has 2 sheets of TI in it, doesn't mean it's for a bigger skier and should be sized down. They're substantially lighter than your M Free 108s. It's just stiffer so you'll need to stay more active on the Justice
Good to see you are human leaving the loss of edge bits in the videos too 😋
What? Never!
Head Core 105 to my surprise has become my go to one quiver ......... I'm 6 ft 190 very young 59 athlete - race background........ side country, trees are my passion in Tahoe, / Canada thinking about Nordica unleash any opinions out there???
So many skiers are surprised by the Kore--I love it! Unleashed flexes better than the Kore, delivering a smoother and rounder turn, especially impressive from a twin tip.
How would you separate Declivity 102x, 102ti and Justis? 6'4 200 pounds, something for Japan as a true allrounder. Groomers, chopped up afternoons, bit of deep powder but have others for the true bottomless mornings. Also sizing, do they get too gnarly in the biggest sizes of each? Or with the Justis having so much rocker can you go long for float but without the contact length getting too long?
I think the X 102 and the Justis are two of the best and most complete skis for 2025. The Justis is a bit better of a turner, but it does come at the cost of stiffness and noisiness. The X 102 is smoother and quieter, especially vs. the 102 Ti from last year. I find it hard to argue against the Justis, but the X 102 may put up a good fight. I don't think the Declivity in the 188 is nearly as burly as the Justis in the 189. I'm 6/2 225 and love the Justis in the 183 but would get Declivity in the 188.
@@SkiEssentials Thanks, really appreciate the reply! Should have mentioned, last season i took blade optic 104 185cm, like it but made me think i wanted more support up front and something a bit more directional. Should i throw Sender 104ti in the mix? Maybe fx106ti. (realise they arent in this test)
Was the organization of this strength? Playful to stability? Or slarvy to carvy?
This is slarvy to carvy, but continuing from Part 1.
th-cam.com/video/sHy8ILcQRsw/w-d-xo.html
Why don't you guys do any Moments Skis: Wild Cat and Death Wish would be interesting to compare, maybe more in the FreeRide category...............
Wildcat 116 is goated daily driver
Moment skis are more western skiing oriented for one. I know they skip some brands because they don't like them. Not saying that's true in this case but I've heard them say as much about others in the past.
We are not a Moment retailer. The skis we sell take priority from a content creation perspective. If we have the time and access, we'd love to get on more skis, and Moment has been consistently at the tip of the priority list.
@@SkiEssentials Sounds good, who would be a good contact for Moment to connect with?
@@Zahava WC116 Maybe a bit wide for a daily, but the WC108 is a sweet option for a Freeride Daily.
What’s you favorite ski to ride between 100 kaizen vs the new wailer 100?
I'm more of a Wailer 100 skier than a Kaizen. I like the thicker core profile and more woody feel with some of the carbon zip. The Kaizen is very precise and you do have to be more engaged--I like to be lazy from time to time making the Wailer a better choice for me.
I’m 40yr 6ft 210lbs advanced/ expert athletic skier. Currently I own Volkl kendo in 184cm and elan ripstick 96 black in 188cm; which I love both. I ski mostly Vermont and New Hampshire. I’m looking for suggestions on sizing for the black crows Justice.
183
Hi. Awesome review again! How would the armada 102x compare to the new rustler 10? Cheers nick.
As much as I'm impressed with the Rustler's ability to handle a variety of conditions, terrain, and speeds, I'm even more so with the X 102. Personally, I'd much rather ski the smoother, quieter, and more cohesive Armada, but that's by no way meaning the Rustler is a bad ski. I simply prefer the more silent and damp Declivity--it's a very impressive new ski. It's flatter for sure, so that's the main difference while the Rustler has a whole lot of tip splay and tail rocker.
@@SkiEssentials The change in wood and and metal moves it further towards freeride than the 102ti? Cheers Nick.
@@nzheliking1278 That was our experience--it's kind of a balancing or give/take on their part, but the ski now feels more adept at softer snow and creativity vs. the old 102 Ti that was an excellent groomer carver and crud buster, but not as amenable to playfulness and soft snow fun.
@@SkiEssentials sounds like a great ski. Sort of like a damper smoother rustler 10 when the snow gets nasty? Which is the only thing I really thought the rustler lacked at times.
What's a good size for the Liberty Radian? I'm 6'3" 195 lbs and charge hard... I would guess the 185?
Yup, I'd go 185.
I want the elan carbons ❤
And, How does the Black Crows Justis compare to the Liberty Radian?
Justis kind of crushes Radian in the performance department. It's also got a very innovative, progressive, and modern profile to it that allows it to be surfy and carvy. The Radian isn't as multi-dimensional, but is still a lot of fun.
How does the Zx100 189 do in the trees? I'm worried the 181 is a bit small at 6'2" 180. But the 189 may be unweildy. Also considering just stepping up to the zx115 in the 186.
You don't want to meet in the middle with the ZX 108?
I've never skied any ZX ski in the 189, and at 6/2 225, I think that'd be the length to have in any of the ZX skis as I have found the 181 to be on the short side.
@@SkiEssentials Reading the blister flash review of the 108 vs 115, it sounded like the 108 didnt have the same magic that the 100 and 115 had. Not sure how that relates to your experience.
@@Whim396 Way different skis for sure vs. the older SFB. Different audience. New Bacon is very similar to the Chronic 101 and 94 just wider and more rockered. Not a lot of zip in any of them, but a very smooth and cohesive feel overall.
@@SkiEssentials Huh? I think you replied to the wrong comment.
Who was ducking under the tree at 25:31?
That's Jeff out at Deer Valley, UT I believe.
Just hard to beat Kastle's
No QsT 106 ? hmm strange or its nothing major there ?
We were very happy to feature the QST 106 in the mid-100's Freeride Comparison!
th-cam.com/video/L_IhqNxUO8o/w-d-xo.html
@@SkiEssentials Oh, thank you very much!
What have you done with Jeff?! 😅
New guy rambles less… don’t question it.
Jeff's busy getting married😂.
@@peterdemaria2456lol good one
I can’t decide between the Declivity or enforcer unleashed…
Unless you're a jaw-clenching skier looking for endless power and stability, I'd go with the Declivity. It's friendlier and still incredibly smooth and stable.
They killed Jeff!!!!
Jeff just got hitched!
Jeff is fine.
Might be more helpful to just pick your top 10-15 in this category, instead of a 2 part presentation with so many skis.
90-100mm skis are too popular in North America, their suppliers probably don't want them to cut corners in these categories, idk. I'd prefer them putting more emphasis on the comparisons videos than the individual ski reviews.
I like when they do all the skis in the category. Otherwise your always wondering how the ski does that's not in it and multiple people are always responding what about certain skis that were not in the video.
That's not how their reviews work. They aren't about "These are the ten best ski's blah, blah, blah". What they are trying to do is highlight the differences between different skis so skiers can pick which skis best suit their applications.
For you, you could narrow things down by focusing on whatever end of the wall appeals to you. This comparison was organized slarvyiest to most straight line speed oriented.