Since you guys tend to really like all the qst skis, it would be cool to see a video comparing the whole salmon qst line up from the 92 all the way to the blank
Personal review of the Justis since you don't see many: This is the most fun ski I have ski'd in years. I'm 6' 200lbs and have the 183 and ski Colorado, Utah, Wyoming. It is a perfect length for me. It charges through crud fantastically for only being 2000g and it's still very playful. I see some reviews saying it is "hooky". I can see that if you're coming from a park background and used to soft skis. But if you're coming from a racing background like me, and now almost 35 years old and looking for a fun/playful carver, it is an awesome ski. It handles trees and bumps just fine without too much effort. I know it won't be everyone's cup of tea, but I 10/10 recommend demo-ing them.
Bob, thanks for adding information on how the different lengths of the same ski handle and what bigger guys, older experts that have usually skied the longer skis of a line but would like to know which skis could be skied shorter. Thanks for bending them, tips and tails, so much info there. You guys are cold smoke!!!!
Thanks! I've been finding more and more that sizing is fluid! On this list, the Evolv 100, Justis, Kore, Mantra, and Enforcer can all be skied shorter in my experience. The others, the longer sizes just feel better, and that's true for something like the MX98, which I feel the 180 doesn't do the ski's justice for what it's intended for. Same with the Dynastar. I have enjoyed the 178, but the 186 is so much smoother.
I really like the way you organized the wall for this one. Another idea would be to organize on-piste to off-piste/powder focus for 90 and mid-90 comparisons. Really appreciate the effort you put into your reviews!
@@SkiEssentials Cool! By the way, I had asked in the past about cork damplifier in the past and present QST 92, and you said it was in the 98/106, but not the 92. That seems to agree with cork not being mention on Solomon's 92 website specs. However, I just happened to watch a SolomonTV 1-minute video on the 2023 QST 92, and they specifically mention the cork, and even put a graphic on the screen to point to where it is on the ski. I added a comment on their video to confirm this info, so we'll see if I get an official answer. Cork, or no cork, the ski skis how it skis, right? And you guys like it a lot, lol. I can't wait to get on it in December. Thanks again.
@@richardcole4776 this happens a lot more than you may think. I am 99.9% sure there's no cork in the 92. I think catalogs get misprinted a lot, and then that information just gets shoveled down the line, so that even the Salomon TV people just read it and think it's correct. But yes, you are right, cork or not, the 92 is an awesome ski!
@@SkiEssentials Thanks for replying on this! Frankly, I've come to trust you guys more than other so-called experts. You've proven many times over that you're serious about publishing exceptional content.
This is my favorite width range hands down, so many fun skis. Added the new Rustler 10 and went up to the longest length QST 98 for this coming season!
I love these videos. You guys do a fantastic job! I'd like to put in a request for a "Skis for Intermediates" comparison video. As an intermediate skier, I comb through the comparisons listening for which skis are more advanced vs. intermediate. One video just focusing on intermediate skis would be awesome.
Have you checked out the mid-80's comparison? There's a lot of good intermediate and mid-range skis in that one. Normally as the width increases, there will be fewer intermediate options. th-cam.com/video/IWMG7PHQvRQ/w-d-xo.html
Hey! Thank you guys for these unique ski comparison videos! Could I ask you for an advice? I’m 183 cm, 75 kg, an upper intermediate skier that are looking for a wider replacement of the Ranger 102, 183 cm (the Blade Optic 96, 184 cm is a narrower one) with good on piste performance. I'm not sure that I will spend more than 40% off piste. I am improving my technique and need skis that won't immediately punish backseat skiing in variable snow and will help improving my skills. I am leaning towards the Mindbender 106c, 183 cm. How would you compare these skis? What is more forgiving and accessible ski? Does the Mindbender 106c float noticeably better? Should I go for wider options ~110 mm? Could you recommend few skis (Fischer Ranger 108, Nordica Unleashed 108, 186 cm)?
I do think that 106C is a special floater when it comes to fresh powder and deeper snow. There's more rocker and taper which makes it cut through the fresh and deep. It's also pretty easy to maneuver, so that'll help with progression rather than hinder. The Unleashed is a bit more rugged, and the Ranger 108 doesn't feel as easy to ski as the K2. If you want to go wider, the Salomon QST Blank at 112 is an excellent choice, but how often is that needed versus the more versatile 106C?
******Great video like always****** I am 48 5'9" about 200 lbs and last season was riding on Holyshred 98 @ 182cm and had lots of fun but I feel 182 was just a bit long for my height. I could not do fast turns in trees and also it was not stable in cruds. I am looking to buy a new skis that is more stable but not hard to ski like enforcer 104 free. *) I think the new rustler 10 is very close to Blade Optic 104 From the construction point but slightly lighter. What is your opinion as far as their performance? *) Could you please let me know what is your opinion between Blade Optic 104, 2024 Rustler 10 and Enforcer 104 Unlimited ? *) What length would you recommend Ski Habits: -)Free Ride/ Style. -)Skiing through trees -)Carving (Piste / Off Piste) -)Chasing my 12y old son -)West coast fresh powder Skiing Thank You
We're pretty amazed with how stable the Rustler is for the weight. The Blade Optic feels heavier and not quite as energetic, but it is more chargy when it comes to high speeds and aggressive skiing, although that does not seem to be your intended use or application. The Unlimited is awesome, I'm 6/2 225 and love mine in the soft snow as well as on the groomers. While you're not getting quite the same stability as the Rustler, the Unlimited is considerably more energetic and snappy, and I like those qualities in a ski. You're getting better tree performance on the Unlimited with a bit of a hit when it comes to groomers and pure carving. I'd say the Unlimited in the 179 is a very good choice.
I started watching Jeff and Bob in 2020 trying to find a good all around ski. I ended up with K2 90ti mind benders 2021. Still watching all your videos and loving the info.
Skied the QST for a couple days in the spring in mostly soft conditions. Absolutely loved the combination of soft snow performance, maneuverability, and carving stability. What other skis should I consider for a similar blend of traits without losing carving performance?
There aren't many out there that deliver on all of these promises. If you want a bit of a bump in carving, check the Nordica Enforcer 99 or the Black Crows Justis. For slightly more soft snow performance and freeride flair, the Line Chronic 101 or Atomic Bent 100 are sweet. A bit wider, the 2025 Rossignol Soul 102 is a great blender of attributes, much like the QST.
OK Jeff and Bob, I just got my Salomon 2024 QST 98's in 176cm, with Strive 14 bindings, thx to your recommendation. Excited about them for sure! I am 5'11, 169 lbs, intermediate/advanced, all CO, do an equal blend of groomers, pow, bumps, trees and off-piste. Based on your QST 98 experience, what advice on mounting points do you have? I currently have Shreditor 102's 177cm mounted pretty forward and like how maneuverable they are. Thank you!
Never tried the QST 98 on any other line other than recommended. If you know something specific about what you like in how a ski is mounted, I'm not going to get in your way, but it seems to work great on the line.
Tons of useful info as always. Love watching these. A couple of years ago, I was considering buying the Kore 105 v QST 106. I'm glad I went with the QST 106, cause as a lighter weight guy (~155lbs) and with a reasonably aggressive skiing style, I feel the Kore's would've crushed me, based on their stiffness.
I'm really finding your videos beneficial as I navigate through the decision of purchasing a new pair of skis for this winter season. Currently, I'm considering several models: the Black Crows Mirus Cor and Justice, as well as the Völkl Mantra and Kanjo. My primary use for these skis will be all-mountain skiing, encompassing a blend of on-piste, tree skiing, and powder. I'm leaning towards a ski that can serve as a 'one-quiver' option, adept in various terrains and conditions. Given that my skiing will mostly be on-piste, but with a fair amount of time in trees and powder, I would appreciate your insight on these models. I'm an advanced level skier (skiing for over 18years) Could you provide guidance on which ski would offer the best balance of performance across these different environments? And you would recommend to me ?
Justis and Mantra are on a different end of the spectrum in terms of demand and power. Mirus Cor and Kanjo are lighter and more mobile options. I'd say you need to decide which side of the fence you fall on and then go from there. Justis is a bit more playful than the Mantra while still containing a very high level of performance, carving, and edge grip.
Ha! Love ski puns! If you look back at our "Origins" and how we've "Evolv'd" over the years, you'll see that our "Stances" and "Mantras" have remained part of our "Kore" visions.
The “pseudo-twin tip” discussion from our on camera heros got me thinking…. What if Skiessentials did a series called Who Is This For, where they bring discribe one of the people we always see at the resort then give them a few skis at a few budgets that would be perfect for them. “Are you an intermediate /. advanced, who doesn’t really hit the terrain, but sometimes you like to land switch? Here’s a ski for. you!” “Are all your friends snowboarders who like to sit in the middle of the slope? Here’s the ski for that…”
Hahaha what ski would be best at dealing with your snowboarder friends sitting on the slope? A really fast ski that lets you lap them, get back up on the chairlift, and back down to where they are sitting before they get ready to stand back up!
Great suggestion! We try to cover most of that "Who's it For" in our individual ski test videos, the main difference is that we don't really stray from the ski that we're dealing with.
Great info thanks guys. I'm currently tossing up between the maverick and declivity. The both sound quite similar, with the declivity being slightly more damped. Are there any other differences in their characteristics to separate them by?
Not really in terms of performance, but I do think you cover the main point here--the Armada is quite a bit quieter than the Atomic, and for me, that leads to greater confidence in a carved turn on firmer snow.
Need some advice: 54 years old. Love to carve - have 3 pairs of stockli’s. Mostly skiing Utah. Live in CA and ski Tahoe from time to time with friends and I never have the right ski for the highly variable and often crappy conditions. Sierra cement, crusty tree pow hunting, weird bumps, etc. I’d like one ski for these days. Help!
In this range, I really like the Black Crows Justis and the 2025 Nordica Enforcer 99. You get the carving power as well as the versatility for manky snow and variable conditions.
Thank you for the great reviews as always. How would Stoeckli Stormrider 102 compare to Rossignol Sender 106 TI+ ? Would it float significantly less in powder? Which of the two skis would be more damp for chopped snow?
The Sender 106 is a pretty unique ski in that it has a pretty long turn shape and is a very straight and direct ski. The Stormrider has a more flexible shovel and is lighter, so it's more maneuverable and playful, especially at more moderate speeds. One of the other things about the Sender Plus is that its shortest length is a 180, so if it's on your list, make sure you're skiing that length or longer. I'd rather ski the Sender in deeper snow, chopped snow, and crud while the Stormrider is a better choice for tighter and more technical terrain, as well as carving turns on groomers.
@@SkiEssentials Thank you for your very fast reply! That is really helpful! A final question, how would the Stormider 102 compare with Armada Declivity 102 TI? Which floats better in soft snow and which is more damp for chopped snow?
@@SnowsailorB These are pretty close. The Stockli's shovel is still pretty flexible compared to Declivity, and that makes it more supple when it comes to chop and helps keep the front of the ski out of deeper snow. All that said, the Declivity is still the more energetic and poppy of the two when it comes to on-trail skiing. The Stockli is a lot more mobile from an ease of use standpoint while the Armada has more pep in its step, but you do have to work harder in order to access it. There's more camber in the Armada, and that has a lot to do with it.
Y'all convinced me to buy BC Justis and I love them, after demoing, the old rustler 10, Brahma 88's, and enforcer 100's, I went with the Justis blind and I by far enjoy them more than any of the skis I demoed. Absolutely love those skis. I'm eyeing up some Mirus Cor, or some Liberty Evolve 84 next!
I'm really regretting not buying them, got a DPS for the same money instead but I think I would've been happier on the Justis; they seem perfect for how I ski
I'm really curious how the Justis and Rustler 10 compare now with the new construction of the Rustlers. They seem extremely similar in construction now and have had roughly the same rocker/camber profiles. Obviously the Justis is still heavier so probably damper, but I'm really curious how the tails compare. Is the Justis' tail still a lot stiffer than the Rustler's? It would be awesome if they did a comparison video.
@@TigerNash21 Yes on paper the construction is similar, but the Justis is as strong as an enforcer or a Brahma or a stance in terms of power and stability. The fiberglass laminates and h shape metal put in way more work than you would expect. The main reason why Justis is being called more forgiving than those other ski’s is because of its rocker profile, which when skied flat it really is more forgiving. I think that’s why you actually don’t see that comparison Rustler to Justis, because they are in different strength classes and that translates to a different type of skier that will be interested in the ski. Specifically the tails, there’s also 6inch long aluminum insert in the tails of the Justis that make it very responsive to input. If you get on the tails, it will let you know and give all that energy right back. It can really kick my ass in the moguls, where the rustler felt so easy to manipulate in comparison. I think that’s why Jeff always highlights with the Justis that its designed for an advanced skier in mind, not to gate keep, but because the shape and construction would imply that it is more approachable than it is, where the rustler truly is an approachable ski for an intermediate. So if you are looking for a ski that can play in the pow when your skiing it flat and then be all business when it’s on edge, that wants to charge the fall line, that’s what the Justis is for.
Thanks for the brilliant reviews! Trying to compare skis across this comparison and the mid-100s one - Looking at the Rustler 10 to deliver the balanced mix of powder, groomer and tree performance I need for trips in Europe, but a bit concerned on edge grip on groomers when the snow's not great. Any view on how it compares on this aspect vs a Ripstick 106, QST 106 or Mindbender 99ti? Trading up from a ~2015 Peacemaker, which was great, but not the best carver.
If you're looking for a wider bodied ski that can still carve, the K2 is the best one on this list. The Rustler drops a bit in carving performance, but there's a big boost in freeride performance for sure. Same can be said for Ripstick and QST. You're gaining agility and mobility in softer and deeper snow but losing slight amounts of edge grip.
I agree with Bob on the Fischer 102 Fr's. I'm a heavier guy and bought these and hate them. There awesome in powder but on groomers,crud or crusty snow there not for me. I think the weight has something to do with it. Mine are like brand new and are for sale.
So I’m a heavier guy also, I got Kore 93 (95 in a 184) for my all mountain and looking for a powder ski next, I’d be interested to know how a qst 106 or the blank would do compared to ranger for this.
@@Rittik Hand flexed the Ranger 116 the other day, the shovel is ridiculously soft. QST is a far better option for heavier skiers imo (I'm 235, totally comfortable charging on the QST 106)
Hey guys! I am looking for a all mountain/freeride skis for myself (182 cm, 78 kg). I want to go for something between 95-100 mm under foot and ~180cm long. I want to put shift bindings on them so that I can go backcountry skiing as well. I'd say that I spend half the time on the slope and half off of it, but freeride is what gives my most fun. I am quite an advanced skier, but I don't have so much pleasure carving with high speed on the slope. I'd definietely say that I prefer to just play around the slope (maybe learn some basic freestile moves one day), and whenever it is possible go off of it. My priority is definietely the versatility of the skis. The weight is also important because of skitouring. I would love to treat it as a one ski quiver for now. I'd be very grateful for your suggestions
Im so tempted towards the mantra 102 but respect the ski for what it is. Absolutely love the graphic with those added race tiger like chevrons….. would you guys say it’s more planky than the m6 or pretty similar? I enjoyed demoing the m6 recently, so much strength! How does the 102 compare? More free ride friendly or just heavier and harder to ski?
It really feels a lot like the same ski with an equal increase in power as it is a decrease in precision. This is the same with the Kendo as well. With increased width, you're getting more mass and more strength. It's not as quick or agile as the M6, but in longer and more drawn out turns, the 102 is simply amazing. I don't think the freeride capabilities are boosted a whole lot--what you're adding in surface area, you're also adding in weight, and since the rocker or taper basically stays the same, the ski does prefer to find the bottom rather than rise to the surface.
Love the content guys! I'm looking to get the Blizzard Hustle 10. I'm 186cm tall and not sure if I should go for the 180cm or the 188cm ski. Looking to ski it all-mountain but a lot of trees as well. What would you recommend?
I think the hesitancy to the longer length and the tree priority puts you in the 180 over the 188. Still a surprisingly strong ski for its weight and build!
@@hugonaslund491 The overall application is very similar between these two skis, but the weight is not. The QST is heavier and requires a bit more effort while the Hustle is incredibly light and responsive.
I have a pair of the 2015 Volkl Bridge and demo'd a pair of the Playmaker 101 in CO last year and loved them (Home mountain is Sunday River). I was thinking of getting them as my new everday ski. I don't hit the park, more so groomers and off piste. Would you recommend something else instead? Looking for something that is fun, playful, but can still feel stable at high speeds.
You're in the right zone for sure. I loved my Bridges back in the day! I'd also check out the Nordica Unleashed 98--a twin tip with some metal in it that is playful and fun while still zinging on the groomers. It's a more substantial ski than the Elan.
Since we are not a 1000 skis dealer, there's not as much incentive for us to review the skis. I will say that they look amazing and it's awesome to read their story and learn about the company.
For a 6'4"/240lbs dad-skier keeping up with kids through mid-tight trees and glades while staying stable enough for some light charging in the open, though rarely on groomers, am I correct in considering the Enforcer, QST, Justis, Stormrider and Declivity? Been using 104 Enforcer Freerides for a few years but think I'm ready for something slightly more precise and harder charging, though your characterization of the DPS skis is a "stay away" for me, as my technique can easily be thrown out the window. Nearly killed myself trying to take a Mantra into the trees at Crested Butte a few years back and don't even want to be on the same run as a Head Kore. Stable, decent access to playfullness, little step up in precision for soft snow trees and glad and, again, stable at mid speeds in the open....no real interest in heavy bumps or groomers. All Colorado and other Rockies. Just bought some Stormrider 88s from you for packed and hard packed days.
If you're looking for something to complement your Stormrider 88 while being capable and strong like the 104 you have, I'd look to the Justis or the Enforcer 100. I'm 6/2 225 and really enjoy the Justis and its ability to carve turns as well as remain versatile for tighter zones. The Enforcer takes a bit more work, but also has a higher end ceiling when it comes to groomers, although that doesn't seem to be a priority for you. I'd lean to the Justis.
@@SkiEssentials Excellent! I'd almost tried out the Serpo last year but ultimately decided that going narrower was fine for (hard)packed and I was fine going over 100 for all other conditions. Have loved what you guys have been saying about Black Crows.
I still run my 2018 enforcer I've had for 5 years now. Super well suited for people who love high speed carving down slopes whether it's chopped up or newly groomed. Works fantastically for rough off-piste but I wouldn't choose them for anything deep at all. Luckily now I have a pair of qst 106 with a touring setup so I can choose :D
Great comparo and appreciate the commentary on the Enforcers. I'm looking to replace my much loved pair in 186 with something a little more playful/soft snow focussed without giving up stability if I can. Anything in this group I could consider? Needs to be an all rounder with a good top end. (Enforcer 104 Free is currently plan A). Thanks.
I think that skiers moving on from Enforcer 100 looking for more playfulness and soft snow capabilities should take a square look at the Armada Declivity 102. You get a lighter build and a more progressive shape without losing too much of the on-trail stability. It's a nice mix between the 100 and the 104 Free for sure. I'd include the K2 99Ti as a good plan B as well.
Look forward to your videos every year! Great job guys. I got the Mantra 102’s in a 177 last year and I LOVE them! They absolutely rip. But with the 3D radius they will make short fun turns too.
SAME! Ever since day 1 on that ski I thought it was a winner. The new 100 is pretty sweet--not as crisp as the old one, but still a lot of fun with the same overall snow feel.
Love the vids but I’m having a really tough time deciding which ski to get after doing so much research. I ski half east coast and half west and I am a pretty agressive skiier that skis mainly off pist in the trees, chutes and all the hardest stuff the resort has to offer. I’ve been skiing bent 100s but they are now too small on me and I heard they don’t hold an edge well so what ski do you think would be perfect for me that has a little more edge grip and strain lining capability through chutes, but ski has that very quick turning of the bent 100 for the tight trees of the east?
Check out the Black Crows Camox--better grip and pop than the Bent without losing much playfulness. At 97 mm underfoot, it's got a good blend of flotation, on-trail energy, and all-mountain versatility.
What ski can you recommend me the most? At this moment I have a pair of bent 90’s wich are great since they are so playfull. I would like a new pair that is (almost) as playfull but more capable on some soft snow and also more stable on groomers at high speed (60mph) and ice. Currently I’m hesitating between qst 98’s, Maverick 100 ti and K2 mindbender 99ti. I will use the ski’s in the alps on all terrain but very rarely in the park, i’m 6 foot 1 and weigh 165 pounds. Thanks!!
I think the Maverick makes good sense here that is light but also stable. The K2 and QST fall to the heavier side, but the QST is very playful in softer snow.
Hey looking for some advice on a new pair of skis. Currently on some playmaker 101s but they have started to completely de lam on both skis. Bit unfortunate but can’t get warranty. Looking to replace them with another ski in the 95-102 range. Looking for a ski that’s still quite playful but a bit more sturdy than the playmaker. Pretty advanced skier, will ski anything on the mountain and love to get into the air. Cheers !
Curious between these and the mid 100 freeride category of what you guys might suggest as the second ski for a two ski quiver. I’ve only been skiing for a couple years Ski3 in NY (Bellayre, Gore). Id probably describe myself as an aggressive intermediate. I got kendo 88s last year and love them but was also looking for something slightly more maneuverable for getting into moguls/ trees more but also better for deeper days and if I decided to start taking trips out west.
I would take a look at the Atomic Bent 100 as a nice Kendo complement. Easy to use, great flotation, and other than a dropoff in on-piste carving, it's a great second ski in this realm. If you want a bit more on-trail performance, the Fischer Ranger 102 is tough to overlook.
What skiis Do you guys recommend? Used to ride the Bent chetler100. But last season they started to feel way to soft. I want a stiffer & more powefull allmountain ski.
@@julienmaheu5368 I have quite agressive skiing style and have gained a lot of weight from powerlifting. Don’t neccesary need a twin tip. Im 5’11 and mainly skiing in shit Sweden… Thinking about the Nordica Enforcer. Thanks for the tip, will look them up
If you're looking for more powerful and directional, while sticking in this 100 mm range, I think the Justis has a whole lot to offer. Declivity 102 is right there as well, bringing a slightly lighter weight to the mix. You're still getting some tail rocker with these skis, so they're a good mix of playfulness and business.
I am a little surprised that you don't have the FX 96 TI up there but I would imagine that will be in the mid 90s.. Wow there are a lot of categories.. I think I would like to try both of the Kastle you have on the wall.. I will have to see what you have to say about the MX.. So the Kastle line is FX MX and ZX..
DPS.. I am glad you used the word "Reactive"... Without even trying the skis, that is what I thought about the Pagoda and Alchemist construction.. I have the Foundation construction which is thicker than those and the Kaizen construction which makes it less "Reactive." I have the same shape "RP" as those Kaizen which does make them hooky in the tails.. I still think that they are great for powder.. Slush and crud they did get hooky.. The other thing for me is that my skis are 184 length and I do not like being in tight areas with them.. My Enforcer 104 Free with a length of 179 I feel a lot more comfortable in tight areas..
Atomic Maverick 100 TI.. I do like how you guys are using the word reactive with this ski.. I am not sure how similar this is to the 95 but I might try demoing the 95s the same day as FX 96 TI with the Mantra 6.. Hopefully it is a cold rock hard groomer day.. I am not one that likes reactive skis... I like damp skis so I would really have take not of that..
Stockli Stormrider 102... I will have to see how this ski does for this year.. Last year they were blowing out at the heal.. You didn't mention how long those skis were but my 2019 Stockli Stormrider are 177 with a 19.3 Meter turn radius.. I got the skis new last year.. I think I only skied on them twice.. I know that they did a little chattering on rock hard groomers but not bad for how wide they are.. They chattered less than my DPS F100 RP and my Enforcer 104 Free.. I would have used them more at the end of the season but with the snow melting as fast as it was I did not want to hit a rock.. My Stockli are my babies.. I will probably start using my 88s around the 1st of the year when they start opening up more of the hill and my 105s probably Feb/March.. If I get an early season pow day I will probably use my DPS or Enforcers.. Last season Colorado got a lot of early season snow but I hit a lot of rocks.. Some of the runs they didn't groom until later on in the season.. I would rather the runs get skied out a little and the rocks either get covered or they are exposed and you can see them.. I do ski with a lot of people who just ski over rocks and it is not a big thing but I am different that way..
Head Kore 99.. I demoed them and they were fine on groomers but I use my Stormrider 88s.. I did get stuck in the crud with them and they were really reactionary.. I also got stuck in the crud with my Stormrider 88s but they were not reactionary.. I have talked to people who ski the 93s and they are even better on groomers and I have talked to people who ski the 105s and they have more float and they are more damp..
Well done. I've come to really enjoy these videos. I will probably watch this and some of the others again. Quick question: Aside from the graphics, has the Volk Mantra 102 changed for 23/24?
Are you guys suggesting the stockli has as much stability at speed as the mantra 102? I was on the stormrider 95 and wasn’t super impressed. Felt a little light and flimsy. I much preferred the mantra m6 and especially the Kendo.
Trying not to equate stability at speed with overall high-end performance, the Mantra has a higher ceiling. Within similar and more moderate speeds, I'd say that the Stormrider is as quiet and smooth, but not more so. When pitted against Mantras and Kendos, the Stormriders are lighter duty skis overall.
Would be great to get a top 3 or 5 in these reviews. We like this ski best for ? Example: we like the Salomon QST 98 better for smaller skiers and the Nordica Enforcer 100 if you are heavier skier for high speed groomers. Trying to figure out which ski is best profile is difficult
Looking at two different skiers. (1) 6'0" weighs 215lbs Type II skier all mountain; (2) 6'5" 305lbs Type III very aggressive fast skier. Both mostly ski in VT/ME/NH and stay mostly fast groomers (and New England ice!). Prefer a last year model to save some money if possible. Thoughts on best ski or combo ski/binding deals you have in stock (leftovers)
Speaking of trading a Nordica Enforcer 100, I am one of the few that took the plunge and went with the Justis for this season. I agree with Bob, the Enforcer's shape is better in the 94. I am 185lb and 5,11", and also think the 179 is a tad short, and the 186 too long - and both are too heavy. I went with the Justis for these reasons: they had a 183 and are under 2000 grams per ski, yet can rail like the Enforcer. But I am loyal to Nordica and I also have the Unleashed 98 in my quiver, both with Look Pivot 15s.
Hey guys, can you think of anything in previous years that has performance characteristics like the new rustlers? I haven’t skied them but from all the reviews seem to be what I’m looking for. I could probably body double on the slopes for Bob maybe with a bit more shin pressure and edge angle, but looking to change my style a bit more like Jeff with regards to play/pop/jib/smear/180*. I know size has a lot to do with it but that’s sort of my goals. I have some narrows for the icy days and powder skis for the dumps out west here, but looking for a daily driver. Outfitting a growing family monetarily requires me to buy used.
The previous Rustler 10 isn't that much different in terms of shape, it's more of a construction change. We have great deals on those skis now! www.skiessentials.com/products/2023-blizzard-rustler-10-skis?ski%2520size=164 Armada Declivity 102 as well: www.skiessentials.com/products/2023-armada-declivity-102-ti-skis?ski%2520size=172
I looked into the Justis but kept hearing how challenging and stiff it is. I ended up on the Fischer 102 and love it but I think I could have handled the Justis if I had gone that way.
176 Stance v 172 Declivity in this group for the 100 ish slot in a Sugarloaf quiver? I was ready to pull the trigger on a 176 Stance then I saw your vid on the different length Enforcer 94’s and got distracted by the prospect of the shorter declivity. 5’6” old guy that skis most things around 175-184 depending on the ski. On paper I like the longer radius of the Stance for crud cruising at speed. Thx!
The Declivity feels quieter than the Stance, and that's saying something because we've loved the stability and smoothness of that ski for a while. There's something special about that Armada, though--they do a great job keeping things quiet and energetic. I'd lean to that one in the 172.
Which is stronger ski in your opinion? Blizzard hustle 10 (180 cm) or salomon QST 98 (183 cm). I am a little afraid of shorter effective edge of QST 98 for steep skiing in the back country. Thanks!
the Salomon has more heft to it, and that's a good indicator of strength. I wouldn't worry too much about the shorter effective edge. they hold pretty tight.
The 98 is amazing! Don't hesistate to buy. They're incredible in powder for their width, and are such a great and fun carving ski. The grip is all there. I haven't had any issues yet. My favourite ski I"ve ever used.
Can you recommend a ski similar to the Justis that’s more affordable? I love the shape and attributes but don’t want to spend $1k plus on a flat ski. Thank you!
Sorry, Justis is one of a kind! Mainly kidding, but if you are looking for a less expensive comp, I'd check out the K2 Mindbender 99Ti or the Fischer Ranger 102.
Thoughts on the enforcer 100 vs declivity 102ti? Iv skied the enforcer for years but want something more fun. Love the enforcer shape but don’t love the weight when hitting side hits and playing around. Thanks!
Yup! I think that's a great transition. You're losing a sheet of metal and gaining more rocker and taper. Those two changes make for a more playful and fun-loving version of the Enforcer. Declivity is lighter, more agile, and floatier without losing too much of the stability and power that the Enforcer contains.
Here's part one of our 100 mm ski comparison focusing on the more freeride/freestyle half of the section: th-cam.com/video/sHy8ILcQRsw/w-d-xo.html Part 2 will be released soon--it's filmed just needs to hit the editing room and focuses on the second half consisting of more all-mountain skis like the Mantra 102, Anomaly 102, Justis, Ripstick 102, and many more!
The shovel of the new 102 seems more compliant and floaty, even though it's slightly narrower. There aren't really major differences--the skis feel lighter and more agile while still retaining a high level of performance and sturdiness.
I have been on (now discontinued) Volkl 90eights for the past 6 yrs and I'm looking for an equivalent replacement. I alpine and telemark on them and find them really fun and versatile, even in powder, for a single-quiver ski. A bit chattery when I'm bombing cruisers at the resort but great everywhere else. I live in Truckee / Tahoe. Any suggestions for a new ski? Thanks in advance.
Fischer Ranger 102 and Liberty Origin 101 feel like great replacements here. Some metal but not too much, making them damp and stable while still maneuverable and floaty.
You guys should have included the Bonafide with the Enforcer, and Mantra as they have all achieved Ikon status as strong aggressive skis for expert skiers who demand rock solid performance.
In this comparison, we have the Enforcer 100 with the Mantra 102, so those are right there with each other, and then in the mid-90's we have the Enforcer 94, Mantra M6, and Bonafide: th-cam.com/video/egeQTQQTWOk/w-d-xo.html
I am 6'-1" 200 lbs leaning towards the Rustler 10, but I am at a loss for length. I want the 186 but I am concerned about it getting too wide. Do you think the added 2mm underfoot from 180 to 186 makes a huge difference?
I don't think the 2mm is a huge difference. I'm 6/2 225 and loved the 186. I did not find it too long, and if you're at all aggressive and seeking of stability at speed, I'd lean to the longer length as well.
That's funny- I'm an old dude and that's what I always thought! I do love comfort. I don't hard charge to the bar anymore either. A quarter puff and I'm good..
It still has a more precise and quality feel to it, which I feel like a lot of seasoned skiers enjoy. They're also pricey, so unless you're young and wealthy, it takes some time to build up the proper bank account to enter Stockli's realm.
We use a mix of GoPro 11 for the follows, and a big camera for the slow motions. That big camera makes a big difference as we've never had the head-on shots before. The GoPro is amazing at how well it stabilizes the picture and they're just so easy and quick to use.
Hi- Wondering how some of the stronger twins fit in. Something like the blackops holyshred or unleashed have pretty high performance thresholds despite being twintips. Seems like they would be good comparisons to some of these skis, compared to many of softer freestyle skis with no metal which most twins generally are like.
Those two skis were our last ones out, so there's a lot of potential for those ones to hold water among this group of skis. Unleashed consistently comes out ahead of the curve when it comes to edge grip and stability, mainly due to the metal laminate and longer camber profile. The Blackops is a sturdy ski that's very damp and stable, but isn't quite as poppy or reactive as the Unleashed. I'd rather ski the Blackops if it were tree/powder only. Blackops is like a Justis shape but without the metal while Unleashed is like a more playful version of the Mindbender.
I'm buying new skis and am picking between the ranger 102 and the qst 98. I'm skiing in the alps and need an do it all ski. What us your recomendation?
2023 or 2024 Rustler 10 (as a playful, go anywhere ski) if you're going to have a secondary ski like the Bonafide or Enforcer 94? Or curveball, Ranger 102 w/ a Enforcer/Bonafide?
If I'm taking two of these, I'm going Enforcer 94 and 2024 Rustler 10. I think those bridge the gaps between the front side, all-mountain, and deeper days the best.
@@jackgrover5252Kind of but not really, especially since they're very different in terms of snow feel. The Enforcer 94 and Bonafide are very similar in terms of snow feel, so if you're changing it up, my theory is to take the narrower of relatively equal skis, giving you a bigger difference overall.
Hi! Thanks for that great ski review!Has someone experience in touring with the blizzard hustle 10 and could provide some information on that? I am not sure if it would be an decent allround touring ski or if it’s a little to broad with 104 (188cm)under foot and also a bit too heavy. I am 187cm and 105kg. Thanks!
We haven't toured on it, but it does fall on the heavier and wider side of the spectrum for what's normally used, especially on longer climbs where uphill efficiency is a priority.
@@SkiEssentials thanks for your estimation. It further strengthens my opinion that the Head Kore 99 might be a better option. Or to just jump into the cold water with the Hustle 😁
The general personality and feel of the skis are similar, but the 92 has more pop and pep, mainly due to a more directional rocker profile and taper shape. The 98 is floatier, has a shorter radius due to the dramatic taper and rocker, and has the cork damplifier in the tips and tails. The 92 feels more energetic and grippy, especially on firmer snow while the 98 operates fantastically in deeper stuff.
@@SkiEssentials I tried them last year and had to get a pair, they are awesome. It was interesting I usually ski 184 but Bode recommend I try the 178 and he was not wrong. They ski great pretty much everywhere, even light pow.
I'm an enormous Declivity 102 fan while I can't say I've had the same experience on the Ranger. I find the Armada to be engaging, energetic, and consistent in all conditions and terrain. The Ranger works great for lighter skiers and those that are looking for more maneuverability than performance.
Honestly, I think these are two of the best skis on the market today. If I had to choose one for all-mountain western carving, I'd probably take the Justis because of the added tail rocker, but there is NO wrong answer here.
@@SkiEssentials forgot to ask about sizing. 6’2” 180lbs, aggressive but not always charging as fast as possible. Since Bob liked the 177 Enforcer that’s where I would lean, but not sure if that also applies to the Justis. Maybe 183? Does the radius decrease in the 177 Justis?
I think the Ranger 102 is fine in the 169 based on your stats and application. If you're in the trees a lot, I also think the shorter length has a lot of benefits.
Yes pretty close in terms of taper shape and rocker profile. Kaizen is more technologically gifted, and offers amazing performance for such a thin shape.
The Blade Optic is a bit more of a rugged ski. If you're more of a straight-shooter and want to mob over any and all conditions and terrain, the Line is a surprising performer. Rustler 10 has a bit more agility at slower speeds, but if you let them both run, the Line is incredibly smooth.
Kind of not really. Daemon was more of a straight-shooter. Justis's best trait is that it carves and turns better than most/any skis in the 100 mm range that I've been on.
We've seen some of that for sure, but in comparison to how many we sell and see out there on the hill, I don't find it particularly more than average--maybe a bit.
There are a few differences here. The 108 has carbon stringers and considerably different shovel shape. This makes it a bit stiffer overall, while floating a lot better in fresh snow. The 102 is lighter and less tapered, so it'll perform a lot better on non-powder conditions and terrain. If you're looking for smooth, fast, and straight, go with the 108, but for more turning, more carving, and likely more versatility overall, then the 102 is a safe bet.
![⭐ฮิตในTikTok!! ( หมูเด้ง MooDeng ) Ver. แดนซ์โจ๊ะๆ ReMix BY [ ดีเจกิต รีมิกซ์ ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3krsyfWUeHU/mqdefault.jpg)
![[LIVE] นาทีนี้ต้องพี่ทนาย | ทนายแก้ว vs ทนายไพศาล | #คุยให้เด็กมันฟัง EP.47 (02/11/67)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HmquaO-PL_M/mqdefault.jpg)
Oh yeah!.....Move aside Thursday Night Football. I have a comparison video to watch tonight.
That's not really a huge compliment, that game was terrible. 🤣
I wouldn't know, too busy getting the goods on 100 mm from Bob and Jeff. @@SkiEssentials 👍
I demand a SkiEssentials t-shirt that says "Hey Skiers!" with a silhouette of Jeff and Bob waving and a rack of test skis in the background.
Passing this along to the higher-ups...
Since you guys tend to really like all the qst skis, it would be cool to see a video comparing the whole salmon qst line up from the 92 all the way to the blank
This would be awesome
the best ski channel on the web , thank you guys for great videos and information, you guys do a fantastic job, thxs !!!
Thanks so much, hope it's helpful and entertaining!
best ski channel on the web !!
Personal review of the Justis since you don't see many: This is the most fun ski I have ski'd in years. I'm 6' 200lbs and have the 183 and ski Colorado, Utah, Wyoming. It is a perfect length for me. It charges through crud fantastically for only being 2000g and it's still very playful. I see some reviews saying it is "hooky". I can see that if you're coming from a park background and used to soft skis. But if you're coming from a racing background like me, and now almost 35 years old and looking for a fun/playful carver, it is an awesome ski. It handles trees and bumps just fine without too much effort. I know it won't be everyone's cup of tea, but I 10/10 recommend demo-ing them.
Bob, thanks for adding information on how the different lengths of the same ski handle and what bigger guys, older experts that have usually skied the longer skis of a line but would like to know which skis could be skied shorter. Thanks for bending them, tips and tails, so much info there. You guys are cold smoke!!!!
Thanks! I've been finding more and more that sizing is fluid! On this list, the Evolv 100, Justis, Kore, Mantra, and Enforcer can all be skied shorter in my experience. The others, the longer sizes just feel better, and that's true for something like the MX98, which I feel the 180 doesn't do the ski's justice for what it's intended for. Same with the Dynastar. I have enjoyed the 178, but the 186 is so much smoother.
Love your vids, thanks for putting a great effort into this epic useful long FAQ video!
Thanks! Hopefully some/most/all questions have been answered! Lots of information to ingest here we know.
Justis❤❤❤. Love it. It's powder skiing ability and driftiness seem at odds with its carving ability. So cool
Samesies!
I really like the way you organized the wall for this one. Another idea would be to organize on-piste to off-piste/powder focus for 90 and mid-90 comparisons. Really appreciate the effort you put into your reviews!
That's a great idea!
@@SkiEssentials Cool! By the way, I had asked in the past about cork damplifier in the past and present QST 92, and you said it was in the 98/106, but not the 92. That seems to agree with cork not being mention on Solomon's 92 website specs. However, I just happened to watch a SolomonTV 1-minute video on the 2023 QST 92, and they specifically mention the cork, and even put a graphic on the screen to point to where it is on the ski. I added a comment on their video to confirm this info, so we'll see if I get an official answer. Cork, or no cork, the ski skis how it skis, right? And you guys like it a lot, lol. I can't wait to get on it in December. Thanks again.
@@richardcole4776 this happens a lot more than you may think. I am 99.9% sure there's no cork in the 92. I think catalogs get misprinted a lot, and then that information just gets shoveled down the line, so that even the Salomon TV people just read it and think it's correct. But yes, you are right, cork or not, the 92 is an awesome ski!
@@SkiEssentials Thanks for replying on this! Frankly, I've come to trust you guys more than other so-called experts. You've proven many times over that you're serious about publishing exceptional content.
Had Mantra's in Jackson Hole and Targhee for years.....loved them
This is my favorite width range hands down, so many fun skis. Added the new Rustler 10 and went up to the longest length QST 98 for this coming season!
I love these videos. You guys do a fantastic job! I'd like to put in a request for a "Skis for Intermediates" comparison video. As an intermediate skier, I comb through the comparisons listening for which skis are more advanced vs. intermediate. One video just focusing on intermediate skis would be awesome.
Have you checked out the mid-80's comparison? There's a lot of good intermediate and mid-range skis in that one. Normally as the width increases, there will be fewer intermediate options. th-cam.com/video/IWMG7PHQvRQ/w-d-xo.html
In my opinion, the Evolv 90 is PURE business. Very directional. Wildly different than the skis around it.
Hey! Thank you guys for these unique ski comparison videos! Could I ask you for an advice? I’m 183 cm, 75 kg, an upper intermediate skier that are looking for a wider replacement of the Ranger 102, 183 cm (the Blade Optic 96, 184 cm is a narrower one) with good on piste performance. I'm not sure that I will spend more than 40% off piste. I am improving my technique and need skis that won't immediately punish backseat skiing in variable snow and will help improving my skills. I am leaning towards the Mindbender 106c, 183 cm. How would you compare these skis? What is more forgiving and accessible ski? Does the Mindbender 106c float noticeably better? Should I go for wider options ~110 mm? Could you recommend few skis (Fischer Ranger 108, Nordica Unleashed 108, 186 cm)?
I'd consider Elan Blaze 106 in this category from what I've read.
I do think that 106C is a special floater when it comes to fresh powder and deeper snow. There's more rocker and taper which makes it cut through the fresh and deep. It's also pretty easy to maneuver, so that'll help with progression rather than hinder. The Unleashed is a bit more rugged, and the Ranger 108 doesn't feel as easy to ski as the K2. If you want to go wider, the Salomon QST Blank at 112 is an excellent choice, but how often is that needed versus the more versatile 106C?
@@ellukeaduke thank you for the advice. I am not sure that it will suit my needs. It is not as damp as the Ranger 102 and too directional.
@@SkiEssentials thanks! I don’t need a wider ski. Your answer is so helpful!
******Great video like always******
I am 48 5'9" about 200 lbs and last season was riding on Holyshred 98 @ 182cm and had lots of fun but I feel 182 was just a bit long for my height. I could not do fast turns in trees and also it was not stable in cruds. I am looking to buy a new skis that is more stable but not hard to ski like enforcer 104 free.
*) I think the new rustler 10 is very close to Blade Optic 104 From the construction point but slightly lighter. What is your opinion as far as their performance?
*) Could you please let me know what is your opinion between Blade Optic 104, 2024 Rustler 10 and Enforcer 104 Unlimited ?
*) What length would you recommend
Ski Habits:
-)Free Ride/ Style.
-)Skiing through trees
-)Carving (Piste / Off Piste)
-)Chasing my 12y old son
-)West coast fresh powder Skiing
Thank You
We're pretty amazed with how stable the Rustler is for the weight. The Blade Optic feels heavier and not quite as energetic, but it is more chargy when it comes to high speeds and aggressive skiing, although that does not seem to be your intended use or application. The Unlimited is awesome, I'm 6/2 225 and love mine in the soft snow as well as on the groomers. While you're not getting quite the same stability as the Rustler, the Unlimited is considerably more energetic and snappy, and I like those qualities in a ski. You're getting better tree performance on the Unlimited with a bit of a hit when it comes to groomers and pure carving. I'd say the Unlimited in the 179 is a very good choice.
I just wanted to take a moment to express my gratitude for your time, insights and advice. Thank You!🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏⛷⛷⛷⛷⛷
I started watching Jeff and Bob in 2020 trying to find a good all around ski. I ended up with K2 90ti mind benders 2021. Still watching all your videos and loving the info.
Nice! Thanks for your continued support!
Skied the QST for a couple days in the spring in mostly soft conditions. Absolutely loved the combination of soft snow performance, maneuverability, and carving stability. What other skis should I consider for a similar blend of traits without losing carving performance?
There aren't many out there that deliver on all of these promises. If you want a bit of a bump in carving, check the Nordica Enforcer 99 or the Black Crows Justis. For slightly more soft snow performance and freeride flair, the Line Chronic 101 or Atomic Bent 100 are sweet. A bit wider, the 2025 Rossignol Soul 102 is a great blender of attributes, much like the QST.
@@SkiEssentials thank you!!
OK Jeff and Bob, I just got my Salomon 2024 QST 98's in 176cm, with Strive 14 bindings, thx to your recommendation. Excited about them for sure! I am 5'11, 169 lbs, intermediate/advanced, all CO, do an equal blend of groomers, pow, bumps, trees and off-piste. Based on your QST 98 experience, what advice on mounting points do you have? I currently have Shreditor 102's 177cm mounted pretty forward and like how maneuverable they are. Thank you!
Never tried the QST 98 on any other line other than recommended. If you know something specific about what you like in how a ski is mounted, I'm not going to get in your way, but it seems to work great on the line.
Tons of useful info as always. Love watching these. A couple of years ago, I was considering buying the Kore 105 v QST 106. I'm glad I went with the QST 106, cause as a lighter weight guy (~155lbs) and with a reasonably aggressive skiing style, I feel the Kore's would've crushed me, based on their stiffness.
Also, the QST 106 is a really sweet ski!
I'm really finding your videos beneficial as I navigate through the decision of purchasing a new pair of skis for this winter season. Currently, I'm considering several models: the Black Crows Mirus Cor and Justice, as well as the Völkl Mantra and Kanjo. My primary use for these skis will be all-mountain skiing, encompassing a blend of on-piste, tree skiing, and powder.
I'm leaning towards a ski that can serve as a 'one-quiver' option, adept in various terrains and conditions. Given that my skiing will mostly be on-piste, but with a fair amount of time in trees and powder, I would appreciate your insight on these models. I'm an advanced level skier (skiing for over 18years) Could you provide guidance on which ski would offer the best balance of performance across these different environments? And you would recommend to me ?
Justis and Mantra are on a different end of the spectrum in terms of demand and power. Mirus Cor and Kanjo are lighter and more mobile options. I'd say you need to decide which side of the fence you fall on and then go from there. Justis is a bit more playful than the Mantra while still containing a very high level of performance, carving, and edge grip.
Well done Gents! You made sure to do the comparison "justice". :-) Also a first... death in a ski review... Well Done!! Think Snow!!
Ha! Love ski puns! If you look back at our "Origins" and how we've "Evolv'd" over the years, you'll see that our "Stances" and "Mantras" have remained part of our "Kore" visions.
@@SkiEssentials "Epic" response. Let the games begin. 🙂
The “pseudo-twin tip” discussion from our on camera heros got me thinking…. What if Skiessentials did a series called Who Is This For, where they bring discribe one of the people we always see at the resort then give them a few skis at a few budgets that would be perfect for them. “Are you an intermediate /. advanced, who doesn’t really hit the terrain, but sometimes you like to land switch? Here’s a ski for. you!” “Are all your friends snowboarders who like to sit in the middle of the slope? Here’s the ski for that…”
Hahaha what ski would be best at dealing with your snowboarder friends sitting on the slope? A really fast ski that lets you lap them, get back up on the chairlift, and back down to where they are sitting before they get ready to stand back up!
Great suggestion! We try to cover most of that "Who's it For" in our individual ski test videos, the main difference is that we don't really stray from the ski that we're dealing with.
Great info thanks guys. I'm currently tossing up between the maverick and declivity. The both sound quite similar, with the declivity being slightly more damped. Are there any other differences in their characteristics to separate them by?
Not really in terms of performance, but I do think you cover the main point here--the Armada is quite a bit quieter than the Atomic, and for me, that leads to greater confidence in a carved turn on firmer snow.
Need some advice: 54 years old. Love to carve - have 3 pairs of stockli’s. Mostly skiing Utah. Live in CA and ski Tahoe from time to time with friends and I never have the right ski for the highly variable and often crappy conditions. Sierra cement, crusty tree pow hunting, weird bumps, etc. I’d like one ski for these days. Help!
In this range, I really like the Black Crows Justis and the 2025 Nordica Enforcer 99. You get the carving power as well as the versatility for manky snow and variable conditions.
Nice video!
Between the 2023 and 2024 Maverick 100 Ti were there any changes? or just cosmetic?
Thanks!
Just a graphic update for 2024!
Thank you for the great reviews as always. How would Stoeckli Stormrider 102 compare to Rossignol Sender 106 TI+ ? Would it float significantly less in powder? Which of the two skis would be more damp for chopped snow?
The Sender 106 is a pretty unique ski in that it has a pretty long turn shape and is a very straight and direct ski. The Stormrider has a more flexible shovel and is lighter, so it's more maneuverable and playful, especially at more moderate speeds. One of the other things about the Sender Plus is that its shortest length is a 180, so if it's on your list, make sure you're skiing that length or longer. I'd rather ski the Sender in deeper snow, chopped snow, and crud while the Stormrider is a better choice for tighter and more technical terrain, as well as carving turns on groomers.
@@SkiEssentials Thank you for your very fast reply! That is really helpful! A final question, how would the Stormider 102 compare with Armada Declivity 102 TI? Which floats better in soft snow and which is more damp for chopped snow?
@@SnowsailorB These are pretty close. The Stockli's shovel is still pretty flexible compared to Declivity, and that makes it more supple when it comes to chop and helps keep the front of the ski out of deeper snow. All that said, the Declivity is still the more energetic and poppy of the two when it comes to on-trail skiing. The Stockli is a lot more mobile from an ease of use standpoint while the Armada has more pep in its step, but you do have to work harder in order to access it. There's more camber in the Armada, and that has a lot to do with it.
Y'all convinced me to buy BC Justis and I love them, after demoing, the old rustler 10, Brahma 88's, and enforcer 100's, I went with the Justis blind and I by far enjoy them more than any of the skis I demoed.
Absolutely love those skis. I'm eyeing up some Mirus Cor, or some Liberty Evolve 84 next!
I'm really regretting not buying them, got a DPS for the same money instead but I think I would've been happier on the Justis; they seem perfect for how I ski
I'm really curious how the Justis and Rustler 10 compare now with the new construction of the Rustlers. They seem extremely similar in construction now and have had roughly the same rocker/camber profiles. Obviously the Justis is still heavier so probably damper, but I'm really curious how the tails compare. Is the Justis' tail still a lot stiffer than the Rustler's? It would be awesome if they did a comparison video.
@@TigerNash21 Yes on paper the construction is similar, but the Justis is as strong as an enforcer or a Brahma or a stance in terms of power and stability. The fiberglass laminates and h shape metal put in way more work than you would expect.
The main reason why Justis is being called more forgiving than those other ski’s is because of its rocker profile, which when skied flat it really is more forgiving.
I think that’s why you actually don’t see that comparison Rustler to Justis, because they are in different strength classes and that translates to a different type of skier that will be interested in the ski.
Specifically the tails, there’s also 6inch long aluminum insert in the tails of the Justis that make it very responsive to input. If you get on the tails, it will let you know and give all that energy right back. It can really kick my ass in the moguls, where the rustler felt so easy to manipulate in comparison.
I think that’s why Jeff always highlights with the Justis that its designed for an advanced skier in mind, not to gate keep, but because the shape and construction would imply that it is more approachable than it is, where the rustler truly is an approachable ski for an intermediate.
So if you are looking for a ski that can play in the pow when your skiing it flat and then be all business when it’s on edge, that wants to charge the fall line, that’s what the Justis is for.
Thanks for the brilliant reviews! Trying to compare skis across this comparison and the mid-100s one - Looking at the Rustler 10 to deliver the balanced mix of powder, groomer and tree performance I need for trips in Europe, but a bit concerned on edge grip on groomers when the snow's not great. Any view on how it compares on this aspect vs a Ripstick 106, QST 106 or Mindbender 99ti? Trading up from a ~2015 Peacemaker, which was great, but not the best carver.
If you're looking for a wider bodied ski that can still carve, the K2 is the best one on this list. The Rustler drops a bit in carving performance, but there's a big boost in freeride performance for sure. Same can be said for Ripstick and QST. You're gaining agility and mobility in softer and deeper snow but losing slight amounts of edge grip.
Do you guys ever get to ride Moment skis?
Never have, but hoping that will change!
I agree with Bob on the Fischer 102 Fr's. I'm a heavier guy and bought these and hate them. There awesome in powder but on groomers,crud or crusty snow there not for me. I think the weight has something to do with it. Mine are like brand new and are for sale.
So I’m a heavier guy also, I got Kore 93 (95 in a 184) for my all mountain and looking for a powder ski next, I’d be interested to know how a qst 106 or the blank would do compared to ranger for this.
@@Rittik Hand flexed the Ranger 116 the other day, the shovel is ridiculously soft. QST is a far better option for heavier skiers imo (I'm 235, totally comfortable charging on the QST 106)
You have the 2022 version? What color and length? I might be interested.
@@coreymcintire5550 they where 2023's. I sold them
Hey guys! I am looking for a all mountain/freeride skis for myself (182 cm, 78 kg). I want to go for something between 95-100 mm under foot and ~180cm long. I want to put shift bindings on them so that I can go backcountry skiing as well.
I'd say that I spend half the time on the slope and half off of it, but freeride is what gives my most fun. I am quite an advanced skier, but I don't have so much pleasure carving with high speed on the slope. I'd definietely say that I prefer to just play around the slope (maybe learn some basic freestile moves one day), and whenever it is possible go off of it.
My priority is definietely the versatility of the skis. The weight is also important because of skitouring. I would love to treat it as a one ski quiver for now.
I'd be very grateful for your suggestions
Black Crows Camox in the 180 is worth a strong look--definitely checks a lot of your boxes.
Im so tempted towards the mantra 102 but respect the ski for what it is. Absolutely love the graphic with those added race tiger like chevrons….. would you guys say it’s more planky than the m6 or pretty similar? I enjoyed demoing the m6 recently, so much strength! How does the 102 compare? More free ride friendly or just heavier and harder to ski?
It really feels a lot like the same ski with an equal increase in power as it is a decrease in precision. This is the same with the Kendo as well. With increased width, you're getting more mass and more strength. It's not as quick or agile as the M6, but in longer and more drawn out turns, the 102 is simply amazing. I don't think the freeride capabilities are boosted a whole lot--what you're adding in surface area, you're also adding in weight, and since the rocker or taper basically stays the same, the ski does prefer to find the bottom rather than rise to the surface.
Love the content guys! I'm looking to get the Blizzard Hustle 10. I'm 186cm tall and not sure if I should go for the 180cm or the 188cm ski. Looking to ski it all-mountain but a lot of trees as well. What would you recommend?
I think the hesitancy to the longer length and the tree priority puts you in the 180 over the 188. Still a surprisingly strong ski for its weight and build!
Thanks! @@SkiEssentials and for skiing trees + playful feel, would you recommend the Hustle or the QST 98?
@@hugonaslund491 The overall application is very similar between these two skis, but the weight is not. The QST is heavier and requires a bit more effort while the Hustle is incredibly light and responsive.
I have a pair of the 2015 Volkl Bridge and demo'd a pair of the Playmaker 101 in CO last year and loved them (Home mountain is Sunday River). I was thinking of getting them as my new everday ski. I don't hit the park, more so groomers and off piste. Would you recommend something else instead? Looking for something that is fun, playful, but can still feel stable at high speeds.
You're in the right zone for sure. I loved my Bridges back in the day! I'd also check out the Nordica Unleashed 98--a twin tip with some metal in it that is playful and fun while still zinging on the groomers. It's a more substantial ski than the Elan.
Love your vids! Just enst to ask if you guys could review the 1000 skis all mountain?😊
Since we are not a 1000 skis dealer, there's not as much incentive for us to review the skis. I will say that they look amazing and it's awesome to read their story and learn about the company.
For a 6'4"/240lbs dad-skier keeping up with kids through mid-tight trees and glades while staying stable enough for some light charging in the open, though rarely on groomers, am I correct in considering the Enforcer, QST, Justis, Stormrider and Declivity? Been using 104 Enforcer Freerides for a few years but think I'm ready for something slightly more precise and harder charging, though your characterization of the DPS skis is a "stay away" for me, as my technique can easily be thrown out the window. Nearly killed myself trying to take a Mantra into the trees at Crested Butte a few years back and don't even want to be on the same run as a Head Kore.
Stable, decent access to playfullness, little step up in precision for soft snow trees and glad and, again, stable at mid speeds in the open....no real interest in heavy bumps or groomers. All Colorado and other Rockies.
Just bought some Stormrider 88s from you for packed and hard packed days.
If you're looking for something to complement your Stormrider 88 while being capable and strong like the 104 you have, I'd look to the Justis or the Enforcer 100. I'm 6/2 225 and really enjoy the Justis and its ability to carve turns as well as remain versatile for tighter zones. The Enforcer takes a bit more work, but also has a higher end ceiling when it comes to groomers, although that doesn't seem to be a priority for you. I'd lean to the Justis.
@@SkiEssentials Excellent! I'd almost tried out the Serpo last year but ultimately decided that going narrower was fine for (hard)packed and I was fine going over 100 for all other conditions. Have loved what you guys have been saying about Black Crows.
I still run my 2018 enforcer I've had for 5 years now. Super well suited for people who love high speed carving down slopes whether it's chopped up or newly groomed. Works fantastically for rough off-piste but I wouldn't choose them for anything deep at all. Luckily now I have a pair of qst 106 with a touring setup so I can choose :D
Great to hear!
Great comparo and appreciate the commentary on the Enforcers. I'm looking to replace my much loved pair in 186 with something a little more playful/soft snow focussed without giving up stability if I can. Anything in this group I could consider? Needs to be an all rounder with a good top end. (Enforcer 104 Free is currently plan A). Thanks.
I think that skiers moving on from Enforcer 100 looking for more playfulness and soft snow capabilities should take a square look at the Armada Declivity 102. You get a lighter build and a more progressive shape without losing too much of the on-trail stability. It's a nice mix between the 100 and the 104 Free for sure. I'd include the K2 99Ti as a good plan B as well.
Thanks and appreciate the advice. Judging by comments elsewhere it seems there is a few older Enforcer skiers looking for some relief. @@SkiEssentials
Look forward to your videos every year! Great job guys. I got the Mantra 102’s in a 177 last year and I LOVE them! They absolutely rip. But with the 3D radius they will make short fun turns too.
Thanks! And we love that 102 as well. Such a strong and consistent ski.
I've had Enforcer 100s for 4 seasons now and I'm still deeply in love with them, dated or not.
No arguments here!
I have a pair of the Dynastars MPro99- and freeking love them!!!!
SAME! Ever since day 1 on that ski I thought it was a winner. The new 100 is pretty sweet--not as crisp as the old one, but still a lot of fun with the same overall snow feel.
Awesome review! Very thorough and helpful!
Thanks!
Love the vids but I’m having a really tough time deciding which ski to get after doing so much research. I ski half east coast and half west and I am a pretty agressive skiier that skis mainly off pist in the trees, chutes and all the hardest stuff the resort has to offer. I’ve been skiing bent 100s but they are now too small on me and I heard they don’t hold an edge well so what ski do you think would be perfect for me that has a little more edge grip and strain lining capability through chutes, but ski has that very quick turning of the bent 100 for the tight trees of the east?
Check out the Black Crows Camox--better grip and pop than the Bent without losing much playfulness. At 97 mm underfoot, it's got a good blend of flotation, on-trail energy, and all-mountain versatility.
What ski can you recommend me the most?
At this moment I have a pair of bent 90’s wich are great since they are so playfull. I would like a new pair that is (almost) as playfull but more capable on some soft snow and also more stable on groomers at high speed (60mph) and ice.
Currently I’m hesitating between qst 98’s, Maverick 100 ti and K2 mindbender 99ti.
I will use the ski’s in the alps on all terrain but very rarely in the park, i’m 6 foot 1 and weigh 165 pounds.
Thanks!!
I think the Maverick makes good sense here that is light but also stable. The K2 and QST fall to the heavier side, but the QST is very playful in softer snow.
Hey looking for some advice on a new pair of skis. Currently on some playmaker 101s but they have started to completely de lam on both skis. Bit unfortunate but can’t get warranty. Looking to replace them with another ski in the 95-102 range. Looking for a ski that’s still quite playful but a bit more sturdy than the playmaker. Pretty advanced skier, will ski anything on the mountain and love to get into the air. Cheers !
I'd take a look at the K2 Poacher or the Rossignol Blackops 98. Great creativity and playfulness but with a sturdier build.
Curious between these and the mid 100 freeride category of what you guys might suggest as the second ski for a two ski quiver. I’ve only been skiing for a couple years Ski3 in NY (Bellayre, Gore). Id probably describe myself as an aggressive intermediate. I got kendo 88s last year and love them but was also looking for something slightly more maneuverable for getting into moguls/ trees more but also better for deeper days and if I decided to start taking trips out west.
I would take a look at the Atomic Bent 100 as a nice Kendo complement. Easy to use, great flotation, and other than a dropoff in on-piste carving, it's a great second ski in this realm. If you want a bit more on-trail performance, the Fischer Ranger 102 is tough to overlook.
What skiis Do you guys recommend? Used to ride the Bent chetler100. But last season they started to feel way to soft. I want a stiffer & more powefull allmountain ski.
They always tend to ski blizzard skis.
Feels like the Nordica Unleashed 98 would do it. That’s if you want a twin tip.
@@julienmaheu5368 I have quite agressive skiing style and have gained a lot of weight from powerlifting. Don’t neccesary need a twin tip. Im 5’11 and mainly skiing in shit Sweden… Thinking about the Nordica Enforcer. Thanks for the tip, will look them up
If you're looking for more powerful and directional, while sticking in this 100 mm range, I think the Justis has a whole lot to offer. Declivity 102 is right there as well, bringing a slightly lighter weight to the mix. You're still getting some tail rocker with these skis, so they're a good mix of playfulness and business.
@@SkiEssentials Thank you! Keep up the good work.
You should have way more subs!
I am a little surprised that you don't have the FX 96 TI up there but I would imagine that will be in the mid 90s.. Wow there are a lot of categories.. I think I would like to try both of the Kastle you have on the wall.. I will have to see what you have to say about the MX.. So the Kastle line is FX MX and ZX..
QST.. I wouldn't mind getting on the 98s.. I did have a good experience on the 106... Very stable ski that does not have metal..
DPS.. I am glad you used the word "Reactive"... Without even trying the skis, that is what I thought about the Pagoda and Alchemist construction.. I have the Foundation construction which is thicker than those and the Kaizen construction which makes it less "Reactive." I have the same shape "RP" as those Kaizen which does make them hooky in the tails.. I still think that they are great for powder.. Slush and crud they did get hooky.. The other thing for me is that my skis are 184 length and I do not like being in tight areas with them.. My Enforcer 104 Free with a length of 179 I feel a lot more comfortable in tight areas..
Atomic Maverick 100 TI.. I do like how you guys are using the word reactive with this ski.. I am not sure how similar this is to the 95 but I might try demoing the 95s the same day as FX 96 TI with the Mantra 6.. Hopefully it is a cold rock hard groomer day.. I am not one that likes reactive skis... I like damp skis so I would really have take not of that..
Stockli Stormrider 102... I will have to see how this ski does for this year.. Last year they were blowing out at the heal.. You didn't mention how long those skis were but my 2019 Stockli Stormrider are 177 with a 19.3 Meter turn radius.. I got the skis new last year.. I think I only skied on them twice.. I know that they did a little chattering on rock hard groomers but not bad for how wide they are.. They chattered less than my DPS F100 RP and my Enforcer 104 Free.. I would have used them more at the end of the season but with the snow melting as fast as it was I did not want to hit a rock.. My Stockli are my babies.. I will probably start using my 88s around the 1st of the year when they start opening up more of the hill and my 105s probably Feb/March.. If I get an early season pow day I will probably use my DPS or Enforcers..
Last season Colorado got a lot of early season snow but I hit a lot of rocks.. Some of the runs they didn't groom until later on in the season.. I would rather the runs get skied out a little and the rocks either get covered or they are exposed and you can see them.. I do ski with a lot of people who just ski over rocks and it is not a big thing but I am different that way..
Head Kore 99.. I demoed them and they were fine on groomers but I use my Stormrider 88s.. I did get stuck in the crud with them and they were really reactionary.. I also got stuck in the crud with my Stormrider 88s but they were not reactionary.. I have talked to people who ski the 93s and they are even better on groomers and I have talked to people who ski the 105s and they have more float and they are more damp..
I love these videos!
would love to see you guys talk about 1000 skis
Well done. I've come to really enjoy these videos. I will probably watch this and some of the others again. Quick question: Aside from the graphics, has the Volk Mantra 102 changed for 23/24?
Thanks! And no, the ski has returned structurally unchanged.
I'm 52 yes old and love the scorpion and hornet
Are you guys suggesting the stockli has as much stability at speed as the mantra 102?
I was on the stormrider 95 and wasn’t super impressed. Felt a little light and flimsy. I much preferred the mantra m6 and especially the Kendo.
Trying not to equate stability at speed with overall high-end performance, the Mantra has a higher ceiling. Within similar and more moderate speeds, I'd say that the Stormrider is as quiet and smooth, but not more so. When pitted against Mantras and Kendos, the Stormriders are lighter duty skis overall.
Would be great to get a top 3 or 5 in these reviews. We like this ski best for ? Example: we like the Salomon QST 98 better for smaller skiers and the Nordica Enforcer 100 if you are heavier skier for high speed groomers. Trying to figure out which ski is best profile is difficult
Thanks for the feedback! Do you have a specific range you're looking at we could help you narrow down?
Looking at two different skiers. (1) 6'0" weighs 215lbs Type II skier all mountain; (2) 6'5" 305lbs Type III very aggressive fast skier. Both mostly ski in VT/ME/NH and stay mostly fast groomers (and New England ice!).
Prefer a last year model to save some money if possible. Thoughts on best ski or combo ski/binding deals you have in stock (leftovers)
Speaking of trading a Nordica Enforcer 100, I am one of the few that took the plunge and went with the Justis for this season. I agree with Bob, the Enforcer's shape is better in the 94. I am 185lb and 5,11", and also think the 179 is a tad short, and the 186 too long - and both are too heavy. I went with the Justis for these reasons: they had a 183 and are under 2000 grams per ski, yet can rail like the Enforcer. But I am loyal to Nordica and I also have the Unleashed 98 in my quiver, both with Look Pivot 15s.
You're going to love that Justis!
Hey guys, can you think of anything in previous years that has performance characteristics like the new rustlers? I haven’t skied them but from all the reviews seem to be what I’m looking for. I could probably body double on the slopes for Bob maybe with a bit more shin pressure and edge angle, but looking to change my style a bit more like Jeff with regards to play/pop/jib/smear/180*. I know size has a lot to do with it but that’s sort of my goals. I have some narrows for the icy days and powder skis for the dumps out west here, but looking for a daily driver. Outfitting a growing family monetarily requires me to buy used.
The previous Rustler 10 isn't that much different in terms of shape, it's more of a construction change. We have great deals on those skis now! www.skiessentials.com/products/2023-blizzard-rustler-10-skis?ski%2520size=164
Armada Declivity 102 as well: www.skiessentials.com/products/2023-armada-declivity-102-ti-skis?ski%2520size=172
I looked into the Justis but kept hearing how challenging and stiff it is. I ended up on the Fischer 102 and love it but I think I could have handled the Justis if I had gone that way.
No regrets, but the Justis is an amazing ski.
thanks for the vid boys!! but where's the Faction Dancer?
Dancer 2 made it into the mid-90's comparison, and if we have the 3 by the time we do mid-100's we'll put it in there!
176 Stance v 172 Declivity in this group for the 100 ish slot in a Sugarloaf quiver? I was ready to pull the trigger on a 176 Stance then I saw your vid on the different length Enforcer 94’s and got distracted by the prospect of the shorter declivity. 5’6” old guy that skis most things around 175-184 depending on the ski. On paper I like the longer radius of the Stance for crud cruising at speed. Thx!
The Declivity feels quieter than the Stance, and that's saying something because we've loved the stability and smoothness of that ski for a while. There's something special about that Armada, though--they do a great job keeping things quiet and energetic. I'd lean to that one in the 172.
Which is stronger ski in your opinion? Blizzard hustle 10 (180 cm) or salomon QST 98 (183 cm). I am a little afraid of shorter effective edge of QST 98 for steep skiing in the back country. Thanks!
the Salomon has more heft to it, and that's a good indicator of strength. I wouldn't worry too much about the shorter effective edge. they hold pretty tight.
The 98 is amazing! Don't hesistate to buy. They're incredible in powder for their width, and are such a great and fun carving ski. The grip is all there. I haven't had any issues yet. My favourite ski I"ve ever used.
Can you recommend a ski similar to the Justis that’s more affordable? I love the shape and attributes but don’t want to spend $1k plus on a flat ski. Thank you!
Sorry, Justis is one of a kind! Mainly kidding, but if you are looking for a less expensive comp, I'd check out the K2 Mindbender 99Ti or the Fischer Ranger 102.
Thoughts on the enforcer 100 vs declivity 102ti? Iv skied the enforcer for years but want something more fun. Love the enforcer shape but don’t love the weight when hitting side hits and playing around. Thanks!
Yup! I think that's a great transition. You're losing a sheet of metal and gaining more rocker and taper. Those two changes make for a more playful and fun-loving version of the Enforcer. Declivity is lighter, more agile, and floatier without losing too much of the stability and power that the Enforcer contains.
What's the scoop on 2025 model year for men's 100mm all mtn. skis?
Here's part one of our 100 mm ski comparison focusing on the more freeride/freestyle half of the section:
th-cam.com/video/sHy8ILcQRsw/w-d-xo.html
Part 2 will be released soon--it's filmed just needs to hit the editing room and focuses on the second half consisting of more all-mountain skis like the Mantra 102, Anomaly 102, Justis, Ripstick 102, and many more!
Still love my SR105s. How would you characterize the major differences between them and the 102s?
The shovel of the new 102 seems more compliant and floaty, even though it's slightly narrower. There aren't really major differences--the skis feel lighter and more agile while still retaining a high level of performance and sturdiness.
I have been on (now discontinued) Volkl 90eights for the past 6 yrs and I'm looking for an equivalent replacement. I alpine and telemark on them and find them really fun and versatile, even in powder, for a single-quiver ski. A bit chattery when I'm bombing cruisers at the resort but great everywhere else. I live in Truckee / Tahoe. Any suggestions for a new ski? Thanks in advance.
p.s. I also have a pair of QST's but don't love them as much. I don't find them as maneuverable and i'm not able to whip them around as quickly
Fischer Ranger 102 and Liberty Origin 101 feel like great replacements here. Some metal but not too much, making them damp and stable while still maneuverable and floaty.
You guys should have included the Bonafide with the Enforcer, and Mantra as they have all achieved Ikon status as strong aggressive skis for expert skiers who demand rock solid performance.
In this comparison, we have the Enforcer 100 with the Mantra 102, so those are right there with each other, and then in the mid-90's we have the Enforcer 94, Mantra M6, and Bonafide: th-cam.com/video/egeQTQQTWOk/w-d-xo.html
I am 6'-1" 200 lbs leaning towards the Rustler 10, but I am at a loss for length. I want the 186 but I am concerned about it getting too wide. Do you think the added 2mm underfoot from 180 to 186 makes a huge difference?
I don't think the 2mm is a huge difference. I'm 6/2 225 and loved the 186. I did not find it too long, and if you're at all aggressive and seeking of stability at speed, I'd lean to the longer length as well.
When I was a kid Stockli was an old man ski. Must be something to it. Old dudes love comfort
That's funny- I'm an old dude and that's what I always thought! I do love comfort. I don't hard charge to the bar anymore either. A quarter puff and I'm good..
It still has a more precise and quality feel to it, which I feel like a lot of seasoned skiers enjoy. They're also pricey, so unless you're young and wealthy, it takes some time to build up the proper bank account to enter Stockli's realm.
So far I just made it to the Hustle 10 review but the ski footage is beautiful did you get a new camera? It looks incredible
We use a mix of GoPro 11 for the follows, and a big camera for the slow motions. That big camera makes a big difference as we've never had the head-on shots before. The GoPro is amazing at how well it stabilizes the picture and they're just so easy and quick to use.
Hi-
Wondering how some of the stronger twins fit in. Something like the blackops holyshred or unleashed have pretty high performance thresholds despite being twintips. Seems like they would be good comparisons to some of these skis, compared to many of softer freestyle skis with no metal which most twins generally are like.
Those two skis were our last ones out, so there's a lot of potential for those ones to hold water among this group of skis. Unleashed consistently comes out ahead of the curve when it comes to edge grip and stability, mainly due to the metal laminate and longer camber profile. The Blackops is a sturdy ski that's very damp and stable, but isn't quite as poppy or reactive as the Unleashed. I'd rather ski the Blackops if it were tree/powder only. Blackops is like a Justis shape but without the metal while Unleashed is like a more playful version of the Mindbender.
@@SkiEssentials thanks!
You can just tell the Armada Declivity had the best geometry
You can?
I'm buying new skis and am picking between the ranger 102 and the qst 98. I'm skiing in the alps and need an do it all ski. What us your recomendation?
I prefer the QST 98 to the Ranger. I feel it's more complete, versatile, and skis more consistently from tip to tail.
@@SkiEssentials Thanks for the help. Just ordered them.😊
2023 or 2024 Rustler 10 (as a playful, go anywhere ski) if you're going to have a secondary ski like the Bonafide or Enforcer 94? Or curveball, Ranger 102 w/ a Enforcer/Bonafide?
If I'm taking two of these, I'm going Enforcer 94 and 2024 Rustler 10. I think those bridge the gaps between the front side, all-mountain, and deeper days the best.
@@SkiEssentials Thank you! Is the Bonafide at 97 just too close in width to the Rustler 10?
@@jackgrover5252Kind of but not really, especially since they're very different in terms of snow feel. The Enforcer 94 and Bonafide are very similar in terms of snow feel, so if you're changing it up, my theory is to take the narrower of relatively equal skis, giving you a bigger difference overall.
@@SkiEssentials Makes sense, thank you for your feedback!
For someone who has only snowboarded and skied a handful of times, would a Faction Prodigy ski be a good choice?
They're playful, easy to ski, and versatile, so I'd say the Prodigy is an excellent choice for a progressing snow slider to use!
Hi! Thanks for that great ski review!Has someone experience in touring with the blizzard hustle 10 and could provide some information on that? I am not sure if it would be an decent allround touring ski or if it’s a little to broad with 104 (188cm)under foot and also a bit too heavy. I am 187cm and 105kg. Thanks!
We haven't toured on it, but it does fall on the heavier and wider side of the spectrum for what's normally used, especially on longer climbs where uphill efficiency is a priority.
@@SkiEssentials thanks for your estimation. It further strengthens my opinion that the Head Kore 99 might be a better option. Or to just jump into the cold water with the Hustle 😁
Keep em coming please!!
Okay!
Sorry for resurecting this vid, but how are the QST 92 and 98 "very different" ? A few minutes later you say that "it is just a wider platform" ?
The general personality and feel of the skis are similar, but the 92 has more pop and pep, mainly due to a more directional rocker profile and taper shape. The 98 is floatier, has a shorter radius due to the dramatic taper and rocker, and has the cork damplifier in the tips and tails. The 92 feels more energetic and grippy, especially on firmer snow while the 98 operates fantastically in deeper stuff.
Do the Salomon’s have enough tail rocker to land switch on jumps?
the QST's are a better choice than the Stance in terms of switch landings.
I’d love to hear your guys’ thoughts on Moment skis
We'd love to ski them and let you know!
Hi guys!
If you would put these skis in order of float and manouverability(not playfulness) where would the mindbender fit?
I think those terms are quite interchangeable. If we use the equation fm=p, the K2 would be right about in the same place.
Missed the Peak 98s, awesome ski
We don't sell Peak, so we're not as inclined to include it, although we'd love to get on them this winter and see what they're all about.
@@SkiEssentials I tried them last year and had to get a pair, they are awesome. It was interesting I usually ski 184 but Bode recommend I try the 178 and he was not wrong. They ski great pretty much everywhere, even light pow.
I am really split between the declivity 102 and ranger 102? - What is ski essentials input??
I'm an enormous Declivity 102 fan while I can't say I've had the same experience on the Ranger. I find the Armada to be engaging, energetic, and consistent in all conditions and terrain. The Ranger works great for lighter skiers and those that are looking for more maneuverability than performance.
@@SkiEssentials great input thank you! - ended up going with the ARV 100… hahah thank you!
Very nice! Would be nice to get a powder skis or some sort of backcountry touring skis comparison.
We've done the 110 already and are planning on doing one wider than that as well as maybe two touring comparisons.
@@SkiEssentials yeaah i saw that! Nice! Looking forward to those videos!
Justis vs Enforcer 99 for all mountain out west that can still carve?
Honestly, I think these are two of the best skis on the market today. If I had to choose one for all-mountain western carving, I'd probably take the Justis because of the added tail rocker, but there is NO wrong answer here.
@@SkiEssentials much obliged! I like that answer because the Justis has way more “cool factor” 😉
@@SkiEssentials forgot to ask about sizing. 6’2” 180lbs, aggressive but not always charging as fast as possible. Since Bob liked the 177 Enforcer that’s where I would lean, but not sure if that also applies to the Justis. Maybe 183? Does the radius decrease in the 177 Justis?
@@lorenroot7667 Similar theory to Justis as Mantra. They do not shorten the radius with smaller sizes in Justis.
I've been waiting for this video forever and the skis I wanted to find out about weren't in it :(
If they're twin tips, they'll likely be covered in another video!
Which resort do you shoot your demos videos at ?
We are mainly skiing on Mt.Mansfield in Stowe, VT
Looking forward to a mid 100 comparison 🤓 102 to 108?
We've been saving that one! Got a few more to do first.
Im 5’8” 150 lbs and ski in the trees a lot, would you recommend and 169 or 176 in the Ranger 102?
I think the Ranger 102 is fine in the 169 based on your stats and application. If you're in the trees a lot, I also think the shorter length has a lot of benefits.
@@SkiEssentials thanks for the input!
Where are the new Elan Playmakers??
I think they mention they have a more twin tip/freestyle comparison video category.
This ^^
What about Black Crows Atris?
Its missing in this and in the 110mm comparison. Its Black Crows best Ski by far. How can you not put it in?
DW, they'll do a mid-100mm category for skis around 103-107 presumably, so it'll go in there.
This ^^
How much more does Bob weigh than Jeff? Thanks
Jeff is 155-160, and Bob is 220-225 based off their answers in previous videos
About 70 pounds.
That's quite a big difference. That would certainly effect the performance of the skis. .@@SkiEssentials
Good stuff dudes.
That Kaizen is like Rossi Sky 7
Yes pretty close in terms of taper shape and rocker profile. Kaizen is more technologically gifted, and offers amazing performance for such a thin shape.
how would the new Rustler 10 compare to the Blade optic 104?
The Blade Optic is a bit more of a rugged ski. If you're more of a straight-shooter and want to mob over any and all conditions and terrain, the Line is a surprising performer. Rustler 10 has a bit more agility at slower speeds, but if you let them both run, the Line is incredibly smooth.
Pink Ranger 102 design >>>>> :)
hi is the Blackcrows Justis any similar to the daemon 99
Kind of not really. Daemon was more of a straight-shooter. Justis's best trait is that it carves and turns better than most/any skis in the 100 mm range that I've been on.
The Mantras, since the M5, have a bit of a delamination issue. Unfortunately.
We've seen some of that for sure, but in comparison to how many we sell and see out there on the hill, I don't find it particularly more than average--maybe a bit.
Declivity 102 or 108 🤔 - in the PNW
There are a few differences here. The 108 has carbon stringers and considerably different shovel shape. This makes it a bit stiffer overall, while floating a lot better in fresh snow. The 102 is lighter and less tapered, so it'll perform a lot better on non-powder conditions and terrain. If you're looking for smooth, fast, and straight, go with the 108, but for more turning, more carving, and likely more versatility overall, then the 102 is a safe bet.