I think what you're talking about is creating more dominance and emphasis with high contrast and energy. This is "breaking the rules" because proper design is a balance of the Principles. When you're trying to create more emphasis, you're creating intentional imbalance. This has a different sense and energy than "proper design". You're still following the rules, you're simply bending them to create another emotion other than pleasant design. The "murder" piece you pointed out still has an underlying structure. It's simply on a diagonal to create an imbalance in the viewer to make them feel uneasy. Which is the purpose of the piece.
I wanna thank you for the Chat GPT advide. AI kinda freaks me out, but if I'm gonna be competitive in advert design, I need to get comfortable. Anyway, Chat GPT really helped me work on my logo thumbnails for a class when I got stuck. The psychographics write-up helped me focus
I think this is for very advanced designers, some marketing agencies aren’t willing to take the risk. But I guess this is also why clients would higher freelancers for certain jobs. At the agency you have restrictions, but freelancers are free to explore more.
Acabou de me convencer sobre seguir tendências. Muito obrigado pelo rico conteúdo sobre design. Pra quem está começando no design, blog sobre o assunto tem sua importância? Pode nos indicar alguns?
"Knowing when and how to break the graphic design principles is a huge part of being a superior and advanced graphic designer." I have to respectfully disagree. Breaking graphic design principles is, far more often than not, proof that the alleged "graphic designer" never understood them to begin with.
sounds a bit radical and condescending. I have a BA in design and 10 years of professional design experience as an art director. If I bend some design "rules", you're going to discredit my entire career & experience? Weird stance to have tbh. if you obey the fundamentals of design like its your religion and you never experiment with bending the rules, you're gonna fall behind real quick in the field and you're not going to stand out or make anything truly unique and inspiring. At the end of the day you just sound like pseudo-intellectual boot licker of design norms, or maybe you never understood them to begin with.
I tend to disagree. There is a huge difference in a design that breaks the principles without realising it, and simply the design looking like an unorganised mess, to that of a design that breaks principles in accordance to a brief, a design message, and the target audience. There are clear examples in the video, so I wouldn't marry yourself to strict rules tbh.
@SatoriGraphics The least you and I can do is agree to disagree (generally speaking). After all, I did say, "more often than not." Allow me to leave you and your audience with two quotes by famous individuals. They pretty much sum up the classic philosophy of art and design (the two sides of the same coin). “Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.” (attributed to Leonardo da Vinci) “Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to remove.” Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
@maca9066 No, they are certainly not opposites. They may not be the same, like oranges and lemons are not opposites. One cannot be had without the other. They each share common denominators such as artistic creativity and visual elements. Another common denominator is “aesthetics.” Aesthetics deals with the perception of beauty, i.e., form, color, harmony, proportion, (and dare I say taste?), etc.. I’ve seen art and graphic designs that have contained all of the elements of beauty. Therefore, they must be far, far more similar rather than opposite. On the other hand, I have seen art and graphic designs that contain no aesthetic value whatsoever because they lack that common denominators mentioned above, rendering both to be of little to no value and utterly tasteless.
Dizi izler gibi seni izliyorum. Bu işten bu kadar zevk alacağımı bilmezdim. Harikasın
Bunu bilmek gerçekten çok güzel, teşekkür ederim :)
Umarım gelecekte videolarımı faydalı bulursunuz
I think what you're talking about is creating more dominance and emphasis with high contrast and energy. This is "breaking the rules" because proper design is a balance of the Principles. When you're trying to create more emphasis, you're creating intentional imbalance. This has a different sense and energy than "proper design". You're still following the rules, you're simply bending them to create another emotion other than pleasant design. The "murder" piece you pointed out still has an underlying structure. It's simply on a diagonal to create an imbalance in the viewer to make them feel uneasy. Which is the purpose of the piece.
Am glad to be following you ❤
Love it thanks :)
A fantastic video ... as good as ever .. thank you very much!
much appreciated cheers
The posters you used as examples.. were amazing.. would love to learn that .. if you could make some video with tutorial
thanks for the suggestion :)
We are appreciate your hard work
You are awesome
cheers! 💛
I wanna thank you for the Chat GPT advide. AI kinda freaks me out, but if I'm gonna be competitive in advert design, I need to get comfortable. Anyway, Chat GPT really helped me work on my logo thumbnails for a class when I got stuck. The psychographics write-up helped me focus
Glad it was helpful!
Thanks satori!
Any time!
You Are the Best🥰
I wouldn't say so lol, but thanks
I think this is for very advanced designers, some marketing agencies aren’t willing to take the risk. But I guess this is also why clients would higher freelancers for certain jobs. At the agency you have restrictions, but freelancers are free to explore more.
It also depends on what agency you work for. Higher tier agencies will be well aware of workflows like this 👍
Thanks for sharing this insights🖤🧡
no worries
Nice
ty :)
Acabou de me convencer sobre seguir tendências. Muito obrigado pelo rico conteúdo sobre design. Pra quem está começando no design, blog sobre o assunto tem sua importância? Pode nos indicar alguns?
Satori on this again 😅🎉
💯🏅
"Knowing when and how to break the graphic design principles is a huge part of being a superior and advanced graphic designer." I have to respectfully disagree. Breaking graphic design principles is, far more often than not, proof that the alleged "graphic designer" never understood them to begin with.
sounds a bit radical and condescending. I have a BA in design and 10 years of professional design experience as an art director. If I bend some design "rules", you're going to discredit my entire career & experience? Weird stance to have tbh.
if you obey the fundamentals of design like its your religion and you never experiment with bending the rules, you're gonna fall behind real quick in the field and you're not going to stand out or make anything truly unique and inspiring.
At the end of the day you just sound like pseudo-intellectual boot licker of design norms, or maybe you never understood them to begin with.
I tend to disagree. There is a huge difference in a design that breaks the principles without realising it, and simply the design looking like an unorganised mess, to that of a design that breaks principles in accordance to a brief, a design message, and the target audience. There are clear examples in the video, so I wouldn't marry yourself to strict rules tbh.
@SatoriGraphics The least you and I can do is agree to disagree (generally speaking). After all, I did say, "more often than not." Allow me to leave you and your audience with two quotes by famous individuals. They pretty much sum up the classic philosophy of art and design (the two sides of the same coin).
“Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.” (attributed to Leonardo da Vinci)
“Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to remove.” Antoine de Saint-Exupéry
@@nospam-hn7xm art and design are actually pretty much opposites, though
@maca9066 No, they are certainly not opposites. They may not be the same, like oranges and lemons are not opposites. One cannot be had without the other. They each share common denominators such as artistic creativity and visual elements. Another common denominator is “aesthetics.” Aesthetics deals with the perception of beauty, i.e., form, color, harmony, proportion, (and dare I say taste?), etc.. I’ve seen art and graphic designs that have contained all of the elements of beauty. Therefore, they must be far, far more similar rather than opposite. On the other hand, I have seen art and graphic designs that contain no aesthetic value whatsoever because they lack that common denominators mentioned above, rendering both to be of little to no value and utterly tasteless.