At 0:50, an M32 ARV, based on a Sherman medium tank. At 2:49, it is indeed an M42 Duster. At 5:13, a US 105 mm howitzer. I think it is either an M101 or M101A1. At 5:18, those are Soviet ML-20 gun-howitzers. The ML-20 was also used as the main weapon of the SU-152 and ISU-152 assault guns(as ML-20S). At 7:07 is something we don't see very often,an UTZM turret for the T-34-76. At 8:00 , the 2S1 Gvozdika:it used the MT-LBu as a basis vehicle. And the MT-LB and MT-LBu utilized a lot of common and interchangeable parts with the PT-76. And the 2S1 is also amphibious. From 9:19 ,the vehicles which Jens Wehner refers as 'BTRs' are actually variants of the BRDM-2. At 10:35 , I think the bigger calibre gun barrel belonged to a 10 cm sK18 field gun, but(obviously) I maybe wrong on this one. At 11:02 , the 37 Lorraine Schlepper is the 6 roller-type version. The French also made(and the Germans also utilized) the smaller, 4-roller version. At 12:04 , that thing is a tank recovery vehicle, based on probably an ISU-122. (The ISU-152 were also given to some Warsaw Pact countries, but the ISU-122s were probably more commonly given,because the Soviets kept most of the 152s for themselves.) You could see the cut where the part which holds the gun mantlet supposed to be. They gave it a new TC's cupola. At 12:17 , that is either the SU-122T( basically, SU-122 assault howitzer repurposed as tank recovery vehicle) or the very similar thing based on the early SU-85. The rectangular cupola gives at away. Again, it is clear where the gun assembly was. I hope you find my notes useful a bit, fellow viewers.
Dresden is loaded with beautiful architecture, the military museum is nice, but not even close to the beauty of the Semperoper or the riches you find in the Grüne Gewölbe.
I always pick up my tanks at the Panzer Depot, great prices and discounts for buying in quantity. Tell them MHV Sent you for 10 percent off extra armor tracks!
10:32 in an exited voice: "Oh my.. is this actually... is this the... is this the - no, it's not, no no. I thought for a second it was a double barrel..." - "Mhm mh. No no no no." *chuckles* Acting cute between a shitload of huge deadly weapons. Love it. :-D
17:00 The people who decided to put this post-modern cancer onto that beautiful building should be tared and feathered for crimes against aesthetics. Thank you and Jens for this video!
Ah, the "other" collection that they only show to their most valued customers. Amazing to see what people have stashed in their basements. Another great tank museum to add to my to see list!
@Johan Jacobs it's not open to the public. It's really common for art museums as well to stash most of their collection outside of a public space (although typically pieces in storage will be rotated at some point, unlike here). You probably won't be allowed access without a good reason. MHV probably got in because he's making a video about the objects which furthers the museum's objective of spreading and preserving culture. I assume he's also starting to be something of a name (since these fields are typically small), and has useful contacts to both historians and museums.
Great Video - history needs to be kept and shown once in a while - great museum and thank you for preserving these military vehicles that span over 100 years
I am actually from Dresden, love visiting the Military History Museum and am actually very envious that you had the oportunity to visit the Depot, I'd love to visit it too but i get the reasoning why they keep them away from the public
That's a gorgeous pile of steel right there. Especially cool to see the ISU-152 recovery version (BTT-1) and the SU-85 ARV. That Lorraine looks like it could use a good long stay at the lads of France40-Véhicules. Edit: also an L4500 with a Bilstein crane? Rare beast.
Loved the way they put a Luftwaffe Tornado in the far corner of the basement. (The silver “plane“ thing in front of it is also very cool, and quite rare to see)
Have you ever been to or plan on doing a segment on the Technik Museum Sinsheim? I thought it had a pretty nice assortment of equipment when I visited 11 years ago.
it is on my list and there were plans to visit it a few years ago. The issue with museum visits is, they cost quite a lot of time and money, while at the same time are often not very successful. Oh and not to mention coordinating the whole visit, this can take a few mails, yet also take several weeks.
Its a nice museum, i was there in September 2019. There was a part in the museum, where they showed the broken and dead soldiers after getting wounded or after a suicide like put water in your mouth and then shot through your mouth. Damn, that was hard to stomach. But the impressive one was the model of a württembergian WW1 Infanterie-Division?, not sure at the moment, the figures of the soldiers were only 3 cm tall, but the whole display was maybe 40 meter long in a very tight column. They have a V2 too, a russian Sojus 29 (Siegmund Jähn), a Marder (manned torpedo) and much more stuff.
9:28 those arent BTRs they are BRDMs, both variants shown are anti tank guided missile versions. The second one is the Konkurs ATGM variant. They did however make a strela (anti aircraft missile) version of the BRDM but it looks like this: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0b/Soviet_SA-9_Gaskin.jpg
no, I think it might be open on the "day of the open door". There is still a lot of other stuff at the museum and also there is an outside area with around 10-20 tanks: here is one side: www.holidaycheck.de/m/blick-auf-die-panzerflotte/dda4d3d8-887e-3b1b-9619-051e8cf2879c
@trainbomb No, it was because people in the field underestimated the public's potential reaction to it. The American rocket programs were ahead, they just hadn't gotten anything into orbit yet because they were too busy making progress with the program as a whole to rush the milestone of first orbital rocket over all else. The first US satellite is still up there, and contained much more useful scientific instruments than Sputnik did. Sputnik fell down after a few weeks, and only contained a radio that broadcasted a beep. The first cosmonauts in space and the craft used to get them there were impressive compared to what the US had at the time, however. They were capable of staying in space longer and getting more useful things done while up there than American efforts. Later Soviet rockets engines were also quite good, far better than American ones. So good, the US imported them after the cold war ended and kept ordering more because they had difficulty copying them. Only very recently was this stopped, and only for political reasons.
@trainbomb The majority of the major Soviet firsts were first because they got a barely working stripped down rushed payload out there to be the first. The majority of American firsts were more useful missions with much more scientific data recorded and lessons learned from. The exception being early manned flights. The Soviets were ahead there.
@@lobsterbark You don't think that the americans took their time to put more scientific kit into their space craft *because* the soviets had already done it first, as they had less of a time pressure going up second?
@@lavrentivs9891 America had a working orbital rocket before the Soviets did, they didn't launch it for a political reasons and because they didn't have a payload for it.
It makes sense not to show everything to the public for another reason, too. Less maintenance. It is easier to keep....say...50 "exposed" vehicles moistured etc. than 150.
As far as I know, Soviet/Russian tradition names weapon systems by their purpose, that is, artillery systems as you mentioned are called by flover names "Akaciya" (acacia), "Tyulpan" (tulip) etc, while AA weapons bear names of rivers, like "Shilka" and "Dvina".
@@GrimFaceHunter Nah, those really are just names of flowers and rivers. Although purely by a coincidence, "Шилка"/"Shilka" does sound like it has a second meaning, as "шить" is "to sew", and "пришить" - to stitch (attach something by sewing, a button, for example), but also has a slang meaning of to kill, to assassinate, to shoot down, or to fabricate a case on someone. P.S. Just now I realized, they have broken that tradition at least for AA systems, as neither "Триумф", nor "Панцирь" are names of rivers, so now those titles seem to be given randomly.
Tank Data. You know what may sell well is a booklet with the real armor data of all the tanks in the museums there in Germany. I mean if you use an ultrasonic measuring device on the tanks to find armor thickness and an angle determining device. You could do it alone or have help from Bismarck or Dr. Töppel.
the sdkfz 251 with the drilling gun on top is not fantasy its a late war conversion for short range anti air duty and also anti infantry/light vehicles etc
9:30 I'm afraid they are both BRDMs (not BTRs) and both are ATGM platforms not Anti Air, just mounting different ATGMs (from the looks of it AT-3 on the left and AT-4 or AT-5 on the right)
the Oerlikon is 550 rpm, per barrel, which gives the Gepard a rate of fire of 1100 rounds per minute, which is truly ridiculous for a 35mm auto-cannon armed vehicle.
Many of those vehicles that they are trying to preserve are still in active service like the T-72 (MBT in the Bulgarian army) and the Leopard 2A4 in many countries WW including Turkey.
hah the Leopard 1 driving school tank @1:55 could actually be suitable for my commute lots of protection from pedestrians and cyclists, but still able to see the traffic lights
I wonder if Total war was under way again would the military try to reactivate some or all of these vehicles for home guard or even offensive use similar to what the British and Russians did in WW2? Would the museum staff even allow that?
I'm glad the German's are taking a long term view of restoration an preservation of their AFV collection, thinking on the level of hundreds of years. Other countries could learn from this.
The Lorraine Schlepper is the most rare and valuable vehicle there as far as I know. And that Lens guy is showing the EU and Germany Socialism that has grown since the end of the Cold War. As a life time student of history I watch video's about logistics as well. After all, with out the beans, gas and bullets the tanks are just immobile, big, heavy road blocks.
Ich finde es schade, dass ihr euch auf die populären Modelle konzentriert habt. Dort steht soviel interessantes Material im Hintergrund welches schön gewesen wäre zu sehen
Modern vehicles with the balkankr.....nvm. Excellent collection, would love a chance to see it so myself but I know I would get thrown out for touching everything.
5.12 Yes that's a US howitzer, I'm like 90% sure, I sat on the end of one of those and smashed beers once with some US boys 'till I fell off and landed on my head on a rock. Great evening!
Luckily I had the chance to visit the Depot twice. It is incredible to see all that military material. They also have a very huge collection of different ammunitions including mines, bombs, rockets and much more. Sadly the approach of the historians in Dresden is kind of the hippie way.
I only know from planes that basically a lot of the instruments had some kind of radioactive material, I think "illuminating" parts of it, since tanks are rather dark, I guess the same is true as well for their instruments.
@@MilitaryHistoryNotVisualized Thanks, that was my hypotesis as well. Strange to see them only on East equipment and not on West one though. Another one for the Bucket of Mysteries
@Demon Princes Girls that painted the instruments with radioactive paints in factories had a habit of licking their brushes. Guess what - they died. West learned the hard way.
Pity the reference inserted a few mins in is necessary I'm gonna guess it's so you keep on the right side of your foreign etched Constitutional laws but Thanks again mate as ever
yes, laws believe me, every edit, every addition takes time, I don't what I don't consider important or necessary. And I don't think it is "constitutional law" rather the regular one or better ones.
@@MilitaryHistoryNotVisualized I'm definitely in your gang my mate, it's becoming absurd and if only we could skip back a decade or swerve utoob altogether I feel we'd be approaching the Free Internet we had and were promised. Take care
Very few tech was taken over in the bundeswehr , the Mig-29 for example. A lot was also sold, Soviet tech is used by many countrys, especially easter europe, africa and middle east, so there were enough possible buyers. Of that what wasn't, it went to scrapping. It sums up the bulk, some units survived as test vehicles or in collections (like seen here). In fact someone once said (I dunno, I think it was the curator of the panzer museum) that people think they had alot of GDR tech but sadly back in 1990 , nobody rly thought about preserving some of it and what they have isn't worth mentioning.
Don't think so. This special basement is made for conservation purpose. Dresden is not next to Munster. The transport of the tanks would be very expensive just for one event. On the other hand the “Studiensammlung“ study collection of the Bundeswehr in Munster next to the Panzermuseum, has still some interessting tanks that can't be seen in the Panzermuseum for public yet.
Ah, admiring your secret agricultural tractors and 88mm hunting rifles, I see?
MY FLAK IS BIGGER!
Look at those potential Christmas gifts...
Somewhere the Chieftain is watching and breathing heavily.
HAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA, Bravo good sir BRAVO 👏
With the video set on repeat...
At 0:50, an M32 ARV, based on a Sherman medium tank.
At 2:49, it is indeed an M42 Duster.
At 5:13, a US 105 mm howitzer. I think it is either an M101 or M101A1.
At 5:18, those are Soviet ML-20 gun-howitzers. The ML-20 was also used as the main weapon of the SU-152 and ISU-152 assault guns(as ML-20S).
At 7:07 is something we don't see very often,an UTZM turret for the T-34-76.
At 8:00 , the 2S1 Gvozdika:it used the MT-LBu as a basis vehicle. And the MT-LB and MT-LBu utilized a lot of common and interchangeable parts with the PT-76. And the 2S1 is also amphibious.
From 9:19 ,the vehicles which Jens Wehner refers as 'BTRs' are actually variants of the BRDM-2.
At 10:35 , I think the bigger calibre gun barrel belonged to a 10 cm sK18 field gun, but(obviously) I maybe wrong on this one.
At 11:02 , the 37 Lorraine Schlepper is the 6 roller-type version. The French also made(and the Germans also utilized) the smaller, 4-roller version.
At 12:04 , that thing is a tank recovery vehicle, based on probably an ISU-122. (The ISU-152 were also given to some Warsaw Pact countries, but the ISU-122s were probably more commonly given,because the Soviets kept most of the 152s for themselves.) You could see the cut where the part which holds the gun mantlet supposed to be. They gave it a new TC's cupola.
At 12:17 , that is either the SU-122T( basically, SU-122 assault howitzer repurposed as tank recovery vehicle) or the very similar thing based on the early SU-85. The rectangular cupola gives at away. Again, it is clear where the gun assembly was.
I hope you find my notes useful a bit, fellow viewers.
@@KillerNetworkGaming Thank you for the correction.
11:30 - *OT-810* armoured personal carrier
BTW the Flak-Drilling on the *Sd.Kfz. 251/21* shown before was actually used during WW2, first with MG151/15, later with MG151/20
What if we kissed... in the underground panzer depot 😳😳
This is awesome, thanks for sharing! Dresden is now on my bucket list for this one reason!
Dresden is loaded with beautiful architecture, the military museum is nice, but not even close to the beauty of the Semperoper or the riches you find in the Grüne Gewölbe.
@@GermanEngineer84 Or at least you could find ... not sure when this opens up again, sadly.
@@Uli_Krosse yeah, I was so bummed out when I saw the news. :(
I always pick up my tanks at the Panzer Depot, great prices and discounts for buying in quantity. Tell them MHV Sent you for 10 percent off extra armor tracks!
What was censored at 2:17?
Is it a licence plate?
secret German Wunder logistics equipment
Maybe a WWII banned symbol of a kind. Dunno.
@@MilitaryHistoryNotVisualized let me guess, licence plate?
A swastika? SS stripes? The reg.?
I doubt it is anything like a swastika, you can just see the NVA roundel behind the cover so it isn’t a WW2 vehicle
10:32
in an exited voice:
"Oh my.. is this actually... is this the... is this the - no, it's not, no no. I thought for a second it was a double barrel..."
- "Mhm mh. No no no no." *chuckles*
Acting cute between a shitload of huge deadly weapons.
Love it. :-D
17:00 The people who decided to put this post-modern cancer onto that beautiful building should be tared and feathered for crimes against aesthetics.
Thank you and Jens for this video!
Ah, the "other" collection that they only show to their most valued customers. Amazing to see what people have stashed in their basements. Another great tank museum to add to my to see list!
@Johan Jacobs it's not open to the public. It's really common for art museums as well to stash most of their collection outside of a public space (although typically pieces in storage will be rotated at some point, unlike here).
You probably won't be allowed access without a good reason. MHV probably got in because he's making a video about the objects which furthers the museum's objective of spreading and preserving culture.
I assume he's also starting to be something of a name (since these fields are typically small), and has useful contacts to both historians and museums.
They actually open this for the public once a year with guided tours at the "Museumsnacht". If you wanna see this, look out for this...
I was in there too
This was a really great video! It's nice to see the actual vehicles.
Great Video - history needs to be kept and shown once in a while - great museum and thank you for preserving these military vehicles that span over 100 years
Looks exactly how I’d imagine a, ‘underground panzer depot’, would look.
I am actually from Dresden, love visiting the Military History Museum and am actually very envious that you had the oportunity to visit the Depot, I'd love to visit it too but i get the reasoning why they keep them away from the public
might be wrong, but it could be that they have special days were it is open or something.
Hi
Can we ride a tank or any vehicle there? Just to try the feeling of those Things? 🤣
Jens is right, context is key to appreciating tanks (and everything for that matter). Also, we need more logistics videos!
That's a gorgeous pile of steel right there. Especially cool to see the ISU-152 recovery version (BTT-1) and the SU-85 ARV. That Lorraine looks like it could use a good long stay at the lads of France40-Véhicules. Edit: also an L4500 with a Bilstein crane? Rare beast.
Loved the way they put a Luftwaffe Tornado in the far corner of the basement. (The silver “plane“ thing in front of it is also very cool, and quite rare to see)
Nice little KS-1 missile next to the Alpha jet.
You have to impressed by the quality of the parking
1:27 I got that War Thunder reference! It's a very addictive game, one of my favorites. Great video, by the way, thank you for putting it up.
Dear Santa.
Have you ever been to or plan on doing a segment on the Technik Museum Sinsheim? I thought it had a pretty nice assortment of equipment when I visited 11 years ago.
it is on my list and there were plans to visit it a few years ago. The issue with museum visits is, they cost quite a lot of time and money, while at the same time are often not very successful. Oh and not to mention coordinating the whole visit, this can take a few mails, yet also take several weeks.
Interesting to see both Panzerhaubitze 2000 with Staubschutzbeutel on their barrels.
Great video! I love museum walk-throughs. Interesting to see the gun and mantlet from a Kampfpanzer 70 at the 7:17 mark.
Is it possible to make a video about the vehicles in the outbuildings? There are motorcycles and Light Vehicles, if i remember correctly
The tiny Lorraine is the highlight :P
Its a nice museum, i was there in September 2019.
There was a part in the museum, where they showed the broken and dead soldiers after getting wounded or after a suicide like put water in your mouth and then shot through your mouth. Damn, that was hard to stomach.
But the impressive one was the model of a württembergian WW1 Infanterie-Division?, not sure at the moment, the figures of the soldiers were only 3 cm tall, but the whole display was maybe 40 meter long in a very tight column.
They have a V2 too, a russian Sojus 29 (Siegmund Jähn), a Marder (manned torpedo) and much more stuff.
And look, another place I think I could do with a research trip too.
I think it's getting to be a nice long list. Time to learn German.
Super Beitrag. Ist das ein Büssing 4500-A1 hinter der Panzerhaubitze 2000?
I dont even life 10 minutes away from Dresden, I will visit this museum asap
Did u visit?
The panzerhaubitze is a beautiful beast
You managed to get the PZH2000 in one shot though. It's difficult to describe just how massive in size and beefy-looking that thing is.
Wow kannte ich noch gar nicht... kann man das besuchen? :O
Ah am Ende sagst du es. Danke
Warum steht jetzt schon eine Panzerhaubitze 2000 im Museum
9:28 those arent BTRs they are BRDMs, both variants shown are anti tank guided missile versions. The second one is the Konkurs ATGM variant. They did however make a strela (anti aircraft missile) version of the BRDM but it looks like this: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/0/0b/Soviet_SA-9_Gaskin.jpg
Can you do a Vid about the "Ost-Schreck"?i cant find any infos about it in either german nor english
From the Comments : It was build by GDR Citizens to break the wall... Wall was fallin before it was put to use.
wie sieht es mit dem restaurierungsprozess des panzer 4 aus? kenne nur ein einziges bild von 2016..
Love the Fahrschule tanks.
Can you visit this area ? I am going in December to Dresden and would REALLY like to see the tanks and everything here !
no, I think it might be open on the "day of the open door". There is still a lot of other stuff at the museum and also there is an outside area with around 10-20 tanks: here is one side: www.holidaycheck.de/m/blick-auf-die-panzerflotte/dda4d3d8-887e-3b1b-9619-051e8cf2879c
The M548 just gets ignored again. It's okay little covered wagon variant of the M113, I saw you.
Now everyone wants to know whats going on at 2:15, including me
I didn't until I read your comment!
Peter Zwegert
Yes!
I noticed right away.
Was it a historical political symbol that is now banned in Germany?
Gas Pipe Jimmy unlikely, it was a NVA vehicle and as far as i know only the swastika is banned
@@GasPipeJimmy the swastika isn´t banned on museum pieces, art or education.
@@roadrunner6224 but youtube banned it
Let’s be honest they could leave all the Russian tanks outside and they’d still start 70 years laters.
@trainbomb No, it was because people in the field underestimated the public's potential reaction to it. The American rocket programs were ahead, they just hadn't gotten anything into orbit yet because they were too busy making progress with the program as a whole to rush the milestone of first orbital rocket over all else. The first US satellite is still up there, and contained much more useful scientific instruments than Sputnik did. Sputnik fell down after a few weeks, and only contained a radio that broadcasted a beep.
The first cosmonauts in space and the craft used to get them there were impressive compared to what the US had at the time, however. They were capable of staying in space longer and getting more useful things done while up there than American efforts.
Later Soviet rockets engines were also quite good, far better than American ones. So good, the US imported them after the cold war ended and kept ordering more because they had difficulty copying them. Only very recently was this stopped, and only for political reasons.
@trainbomb The majority of the major Soviet firsts were first because they got a barely working stripped down rushed payload out there to be the first. The majority of American firsts were more useful missions with much more scientific data recorded and lessons learned from.
The exception being early manned flights. The Soviets were ahead there.
@@lobsterbark You don't think that the americans took their time to put more scientific kit into their space craft *because* the soviets had already done it first, as they had less of a time pressure going up second?
@@lavrentivs9891 America had a working orbital rocket before the Soviets did, they didn't launch it for a political reasons and because they didn't have a payload for it.
@@lobsterbark So you're saying that the USA could have sent a rocket into orbit, but not a satellite?
I was there as well when they opened it some years ago :D
It makes sense not to show everything to the public for another reason, too. Less maintenance. It is easier to keep....say...50 "exposed" vehicles moistured etc. than 150.
凄い博物館ですね！！
こんなん残ってるんだ～♪
戦争当時はいきなり召集されてこれ乗れ言われて出撃してドカーンって撃たれてたんでしょうかね？コワ
Love a visit here. I promise to hold my breath and not to sweat
As far as I know, Soviet/Russian tradition names weapon systems by their purpose, that is, artillery systems as you mentioned are called by flover names "Akaciya" (acacia), "Tyulpan" (tulip) etc, while AA weapons bear names of rivers, like "Shilka" and "Dvina".
That's a naming convention, but it's not by the purpose. Maybe something is lost in translation?
@@GrimFaceHunter
Nah, those really are just names of flowers and rivers. Although purely by a coincidence, "Шилка"/"Shilka" does sound like it has a second meaning, as "шить" is "to sew", and "пришить" - to stitch (attach something by sewing, a button, for example), but also has a slang meaning of to kill, to assassinate, to shoot down, or to fabricate a case on someone.
P.S. Just now I realized, they have broken that tradition at least for AA systems, as neither "Триумф", nor "Панцирь" are names of rivers, so now those titles seem to be given randomly.
@@GrimFaceHunter ; A firing artillery does look like a flower for a few milliseconds. Especially when the barrel is upright.
@7:13 looks like a 152mm Gun/Rocket Launcher which would be used in the Kpz 70
Tank Data. You know what may sell well is a booklet with the real armor data of all the tanks in the museums there in Germany. I mean if you use an ultrasonic measuring device on the tanks to find armor thickness and an angle determining device. You could do it alone or have help from Bismarck or Dr. Töppel.
the sdkfz 251 with the drilling gun on top is not fantasy its a late war conversion for short range anti air duty and also anti infantry/light vehicles etc
By fantasy he was referring to the fact that is not an original setup nor paint job.
Vielen dank
@7:45 the camera gets wet eyes on all the hardware that's in there...
is that what you think, hurting you ??
Why does the PT76 have a radiation warning label? Are those laser or strong infrared lights?
likely the gauges etc. same goes for many WW2 planes as well.
9:30 I'm afraid they are both BRDMs (not BTRs) and both are ATGM platforms not Anti Air, just mounting different ATGMs (from the looks of it AT-3 on the left and AT-4 or AT-5 on the right)
This is inspiring me to become a military historian
did you also get to see the systeme Rubesh from the GDR Kusten Raketen REgiment 18 ??????
the Oerlikon is 550 rpm, per barrel, which gives the Gepard a rate of fire of 1100 rounds per minute, which is truly ridiculous for a 35mm auto-cannon armed vehicle.
Many of those vehicles that they are trying to preserve are still in active service like the T-72 (MBT in the Bulgarian army) and the Leopard 2A4 in many countries WW including Turkey.
hah the Leopard 1 driving school tank @1:55 could actually be suitable for my commute
lots of protection from pedestrians and cyclists, but still able to see the traffic lights
What is the matter with this channel's logo in 2:15?
It may have been to mask the identity of someone else in the depot. Germany and Austria have fairly strict identity privacy laws.
I wonder if Total war was under way again would the military try to reactivate some or all of these vehicles for home guard or even offensive use similar to what the British and Russians did in WW2? Would the museum staff even allow that?
I'm glad the German's are taking a long term view of restoration an preservation of their AFV collection, thinking on the level of hundreds of years. Other countries could learn from this.
Nive tour! Wonder how the Alvis Stalwart got there!
WOW ! A place to see ! sometime ? Go ARMY
@ 12:20. Isnt that a SU-85 armored recovery vehicle? Cheers!
4:43 . . . T-55AM2B Kladivo . . . last significant upgrade the East German Army undertook . . .
do you know if a lorraine 38L schlepper restoration project is in progress?
12:00 At first rebuild ISU-152 and SU-85. and than 2 ex-T-34s.
Germany using bananas to shoot planes? 6:35
Is there any further information on the ostschreck berlinwall breaker vehicle?
seems to be an untold story so far. Even in german i only managed to get one google hit and it refers to a forum post related to this video :D
The russian CIWS looks like a Dalek.
That is indeed it's nickname in the military intelligence arena.
I thought the same...I was a tad confused until I realised it was an AK630 :P
@@unexpectedcaveman6573 REally? Cool!
Always wondered what Bubbles was up to after Trailer Park Boys was done.
I think the BH bought the turrets from the french for Kürassier
Yes, museum... We all know you're not rearming in secret again for WW3...
So how did they get all these down that elevator? 😀
Der ost Deutschland Werthmarck ist Kaput......
At 5:16 it is a M1948a1 105mm howitzer....
The Lorraine Schlepper is the most rare and valuable vehicle there as far as I know. And that Lens guy is showing the EU and Germany Socialism that has grown since the end of the Cold War. As a life time student of history I watch video's about logistics as well. After all, with out the beans, gas and bullets the tanks are just immobile, big, heavy road blocks.
What? Putting tanks into their real context as killing machines is important. It's not "Socialism" to think that's killing isn't worth celebrating.
Ich finde es schade, dass ihr euch auf die populären Modelle konzentriert habt. Dort steht soviel interessantes Material im Hintergrund welches schön gewesen wäre zu sehen
Modern vehicles with the balkankr.....nvm. Excellent collection, would love a chance to see it so myself but I know I would get thrown out for touching everything.
Wow, just Wow!
more videos of logistics please!
das under museum?
I would love it to see the Tiger in German hands. And Museums.
In Munster. The Tiger 1 is a replica, though. They had an actual Tiger 1 on display, on loan, but the owner pulled it to restore it.
@@matt47110815 i thought the only Tiger 1 ist in Britain
5.12 Yes that's a US howitzer, I'm like 90% sure, I sat on the end of one of those and smashed beers once with some US boys 'till I fell off and landed on my head on a rock. Great evening!
Luckily I had the chance to visit the Depot twice. It is incredible to see all that military material.
They also have a very huge collection of different ammunitions including mines, bombs, rockets and much more.
Sadly the approach of the historians in Dresden is kind of the hippie way.
Jans would need to grow a better moustache to become a German Fletcher.
People who visit this place must feel like a child in a candy shop
What is with the small radiation tag on the Soviet side vehicles? Do they have traces of tritium or other radioactive element?
I only know from planes that basically a lot of the instruments had some kind of radioactive material, I think "illuminating" parts of it, since tanks are rather dark, I guess the same is true as well for their instruments.
@@MilitaryHistoryNotVisualized Thanks, that was my hypotesis as well. Strange to see them only on East equipment and not on West one though. Another one for the Bucket of Mysteries
We have stronger laws and care of troops useing radio active paints
@Demon Princes Girls that painted the instruments with radioactive paints in factories had a habit of licking their brushes. Guess what - they died. West learned the hard way.
What was censored?
What's with that gigantic eyesore on the building?
That's what happens if you go to an architect, and tell them to draw what they like, rather than what you need.
Pity the reference inserted a few mins in is necessary I'm gonna guess it's so you keep on the right side of your foreign etched Constitutional laws but Thanks again mate as ever
? you mean the disclaimer?
@@MilitaryHistoryNotVisualized I mean the disclaimer yes thanks for reply.
yes, laws believe me, every edit, every addition takes time, I don't what I don't consider important or necessary. And I don't think it is "constitutional law" rather the regular one or better ones.
@@MilitaryHistoryNotVisualized I'm definitely in your gang my mate, it's becoming absurd and if only we could skip back a decade or swerve utoob altogether I feel we'd be approaching the Free Internet we had and were promised. Take care
What happens to all USSR Soviet Unions arms after Berlin wall fell? GREAT VIDEOS!!!
Very few tech was taken over in the bundeswehr , the Mig-29 for example. A lot was also sold, Soviet tech is used by many countrys, especially easter europe, africa and middle east, so there were enough possible buyers. Of that what wasn't, it went to scrapping. It sums up the bulk, some units survived as test vehicles or in collections (like seen here). In fact someone once said (I dunno, I think it was the curator of the panzer museum) that people think they had alot of GDR tech but sadly back in 1990 , nobody rly thought about preserving some of it and what they have isn't worth mentioning.
Where some of these vehicles part of “Stahl auf der heide” this year?
not sure
Don't think so. This special basement is made for conservation purpose. Dresden is not next to Munster. The transport of the tanks would be very expensive just for one event.
On the other hand the “Studiensammlung“ study collection of the Bundeswehr in Munster next to the Panzermuseum, has still some interessting tanks that can't be seen in the Panzermuseum for public yet.
Panzerhaubitze 2000 im Museum kein Wunder das die Bundeswehr untergeht das sind doch noch Erzatz Teile 😂😂😂
Moin, wie zum Teufel kommt man darein????
The fact that they completely ignored the Tatra 813 made me sad...
where it was?
@@MilitaryHistoryNotVisualized huge truck next to that rusty French Artillery tractor
Ill show you all my tanks , but you have to hold your breath while we look at them...
Can't they varnish (or plastic coat) everything? :-)