I heard you mention about them skidding on the pad at take off, never noticed before now I was looking for it, that’s freaking awesome how quickly it corrects.
42:48 Verizon Wireless 161170-3 means that one of the controllers was trying to access a porn site on his monitor. 44:20 Graphics goes ape sh*t . Virus was downloaded when porn site accessed. I think it was the guy with the keg hat on.
That wasn’t the only audio anomaly. There was one before liftoff where a woman is explaining to someone what channel is what while the countdown network is trying to talk over it and get the job down. The other one is just a phone ringing and an automated operator announcing an error with the connection. All in all, it made it seem like me and the kids down the block we launching a bottle rocket.
in my work as a live event technician, sometimes i run these conference loops, whats going on there is the entire team is probably on a conference call and we are getting the feed of that, investors and other high end company employees, CEOs and what not, can probably call in and listen, usually this is managed by someone and they mute anyone calling in to the conference call and someone screwed up and probably tried to 3 way call someone in and wasnt muted by who was managing the conference call. (this has happened many times in my events) as for the animation, probably a network data error but no idea really
FYI the AJ-26 was pure AeroJet / Kuznetsov (clue... A J / NK), nothing to do with Rocketdyne. They also made the Atlas AJ-60 SRBs. RD180 was supplied from NPO Energomash via Pratt & Whitney, who later bought Rocketdyne. Much later AeroJet bought Rocketdyne. And became AeroJet-Rocketdyne.
NK33 still being used by Russia in the Soyuz 2.1v for a few launches, but I think they check and test them very carefully before use and they don't report how many fail. They will be replaced by the RD-193 which is the basis for the new RD-181 that Antares now uses. Unfortunately AR-26 was an expensive embarrassing failure for AeroJet and Orbital, it was always a temporary solution due to limited supply even if they all worked and didn't explode (that happened twice).
Sbreng, sbrang, sbreng (guitar + flanger +echo) piri-pi-pirippi-pi-piri-pi-pirippi (guitar thrumming "muffled" with the shirt sleeve) Et Volià the intro music is done!
Methinks they will be spending a bit repairing the launch platform after a dry launch. The shots of the smoking pad apres launch looked ominous. I also thought the water deluge was to cut down on noise as well?
right at takeoff it looked a little scary as it tilted a bit to the side... is that normal? I figured they'd clear the tower before starting to pitch down range.
So that call in was an automated conference call call in that someone programmed into their Skype or outlook so it calls you when the thing starts. My company uses the same conference call system and it happens all the time.
Spotted ISS 10 mins ago. Also, as you said, I was expecting to see Cygnus chasing behind it. Some satellite, dimmer than ISS, came behind the ISS, approximately on the same path, but about 5 mins after ISS disappeared. So, they were around 8-10 mins apart. Could that be the Cygnus? I am confused with the separation angle. 🤔
WHAT did I just see in an ad (for "Rotating Globes"?) that had YOU in a bowling alley, clad in a spacesuit using planet earth as your ball?! What the heck was THAT about?
There most definitely was something off-norminal with the water deluge and dampening system..... LOOK AT THE FENCE, OFF TO THE RIGHT AT 47:00 !!!!!!!! Maybe I'm wrong about the water deluge system,,, but I definitely don't think they were meaning to blow that fence down with the exhaust like they did here today.
It too bad they dont do a live video. Id love to see what a solid rocket booster would look like in vacuum!! If theres any difference between a srb and liquid fuel
What is this, the UFC? whats the point of having a countdown timer if youre just going to hide it once it gets to the time where people will actually be watching the timer..?
I just don't get it why other already existing companies don't land their rockets they keep sticking to the old ways of launching rockets and wreck them. Why destroy them, when with a little more effort, you can get them back and reuse. It's just stupid to see only SpaceX does this.
@@Aluminator82 It's not a matter of just snapping your fingers and landing a rocket. that will take years of research and development to achieve, and when you do, SpaceX is already the dominant player in the industry. Just having a reusable rocket doesn't give you any advantage over them, especially when, by that time, you have something comparable to the Falcon 9 and they are flying Starship.
I think it would be nice when there was 30 seconds before launch you wouldnt say anything. Its at that moment you dont need any comments thanks for permitting me to comment
@@TraditionalAnglican Don't work so hard dude, NG has a PR department. They will assure us that the bolts were screwed on properly...… go back to sleep.
MpowerdAPE - We’ll be assured the thing has been screwed together correctly by its payload reaching the desired orbit. Unlike Boeing DM-1, this one should actually reach the ISS.
NASA wanted two independent providers, so if either of them was grounded for any reason they would still have access. Thus, they didn't have to compete with SpaceX, just with everybody else. I bet you that in five years, when Starship has rendered every other launch vehicle and spacecraft in the world obsolete, NG, Boeing, and Sierra Nevada will all still have their contracts for commercial crew and supply, for that very reason.
In 25 years they might not even be launching rockets there’s a chance for a new propulsion. You will be saying I remember watching rockets being launched. Grand kids be like yeah that’s so old school. Of course we have come full circle from launching rockets in the 60s to launching rockets in the 2020s. So who knows
@@donjones4719 Rocket Lab is preparing for recovering their Electron boosters, though, so, at least there's that. Oh, and an upcoming New Glenn, but it's not flying yet.
@@caav56 True. Although the Electron will not actually return and land, but control it's reentry and be caught mid-air by parachute. I love that RL is doing this, and there are sound reasons this is the right approach for reusing that size rocket. (Details included for Michael Hays.) Will be interested to see Blue Origin's New Glen make their landing attempts in 2021. Their approach is similar to SpaceX but it took SpaceX quite a few tries to successfully land. Michael H, don't be misled by Blue Origin's ability to land their suborbital New Shepard rocket. Its reentry speed is a small fraction of an orbital booster's speed; landing one of these is in easy reach of any company that wants to. It's important to note, in this thread about a Northrup Grumman launch, that no major established launcher builder is developing SpaceX style landing. 3 U.S. companies are in serious development of new rockets, none of which can land. Arianna Space has talked of the need to build one, but no real development done. Don't know if the Russians are working on anything, but doubt they have the financial resources. *But* the Chinese are definitely working on this, although details are scarce.
Has anyone made a graph showing public attention, by way of TH-cam metrics of rocket launch's, I don't think this poor little rocket getting to much attention by the public, unlike SpaceX. I think a good graph might help the bean counters understand better, that the way Grandpa made rockets is coming to an end.
@Prowler Cam It's kinda NASA fault in a way for decades they drum it in to us how important reusable was because of the space shuttle. Apollo will always be a milestone in human history, but from that point on the public just see them as rerun on TV, the space shuttle was two steps forward and one step back on a good day. Elon and associates fulfill the old NASA reusable mantra.
@Prowler Cam For me, it was those giant bottle rockets on the sides. Yep Shuttle was nothing like the original design they show us first. Got to give the engineer credit for making it work at all.
He's traveling, not at home in his regular studio. And he has far far more subscribers that SpaceXcentric, has been doing this much longer (all due respect to Kevin).
It is real, and this is also the case for ESA astronauts. They have to do so, because atm the only launcher able to bring human to the iss is the russian Soyouz.
@@spenlaprincipale4652 I think all flight crew, from all countries, have to know both Russian and English so that they ca communicate with each other and with both mission control centers.
@@odysseusrex5908 All ISS crew to be specific. Because ISS has a Russian end and a US end, with the same 3 to 7 people doing all the work on any given day.
exAMEN 🌈 FIRM'amen'T, the Sun needs oxygen to breathe, my brothers anD sisters are going to figure it out. Americans tax dollars pays for Mars Mis'Sions, The government spaces out with your tax money while you're hard at work. Psalm 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork. Job 38:4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.
SpaceX launches have spoiled us. These other companies need to step up their launch performance.
Agreed.
Haha yes expectations totally changed... where is the video feed!!!! What is this animation stuff...
I've got so used to SpaceX's telemetry and live video.
Loving the tiny rocketlab tower in the foreground. Really puts the size in perspective!
The black pole looking thing at 12:25 ?
J Biafra yep it’s the strongback/ launch base for Electron by Rocket Lab
42:40 is the Perfect Phone call lol
That mid-flight phone call for pizza made my day 😂
While the pointy end was up, hopefully the accelerometers are also pointed up, unlike the Proton
Highlights:
42:41 Phone call 44:11 Kraken
Had to go rewatch a SpaceX launch to feel better after seeing this.....
What more could be expected from a hardcore SpaceX cheergirl?
@@PArabinddeep you don't know the half of it...couldn't use my pompoms for a second lol
@@-A-c Well Atleast I know better than a pseudo space fan.
Antichrys - Gotta love a girl who brings her own pompoms to a launch! 😱😂😂🤷🏼♂️
@@PArabinddeep What is it that you think you know?
I heard you mention about them skidding on the pad at take off, never noticed before now I was looking for it, that’s freaking awesome how quickly it corrects.
lol the Kraken caused by the Verizon voicemail had me dying!
42:48 Verizon Wireless 161170-3 means that one of the controllers was trying to access a porn site on his monitor. 44:20 Graphics goes ape sh*t . Virus was downloaded when porn site accessed. I think it was the guy with the keg hat on.
It’s cool watching the plume get bigger after hearing about the physics of that from your aerospike video.
34:07 for launch
45:30 looks like you’re sitting in the corner of the mission control room giving useful advice to NG
Tim you’re answer on the 25-50 years from now in space was so insightful and interesting! Would be an awesome deep dive for a video!!
44:20 i love this part
Both Next Spaceflight and Space X Now are available on the Google play store :)
@Everyday Astronaut... what was the odd phone call at the 42:40 mark? And the weird graphics right after you said every looked perfect at 44:15 mark?
1. Phone call was a hot (open) mic on the official countdown audio. Not Everyday Astronaut's fault.
2. Idk about the weird graphics
Seems to me like random glitches in both cases
That wasn’t the only audio anomaly. There was one before liftoff where a woman is explaining to someone what channel is what while the countdown network is trying to talk over it and get the job down. The other one is just a phone ringing and an automated operator announcing an error with the connection.
All in all, it made it seem like me and the kids down the block we launching a bottle rocket.
in my work as a live event technician, sometimes i run these conference loops, whats going on there is the entire team is probably on a conference call and we are getting the feed of that, investors and other high end company employees, CEOs and what not, can probably call in and listen, usually this is managed by someone and they mute anyone calling in to the conference call and someone screwed up and probably tried to 3 way call someone in and wasnt muted by who was managing the conference call. (this has happened many times in my events) as for the animation, probably a network data error but no idea really
FYI the AJ-26 was pure AeroJet / Kuznetsov (clue... A J / NK), nothing to do with Rocketdyne. They also made the Atlas AJ-60 SRBs.
RD180 was supplied from NPO Energomash via Pratt & Whitney, who later bought Rocketdyne. Much later AeroJet bought Rocketdyne. And became AeroJet-Rocketdyne.
This two engines NK 33 and RD 180 are dope.
NK33 still being used by Russia in the Soyuz 2.1v for a few launches, but I think they check and test them very carefully before use and they don't report how many fail. They will be replaced by the RD-193 which is the basis for the new RD-181 that Antares now uses.
Unfortunately AR-26 was an expensive embarrassing failure for AeroJet and Orbital, it was always a temporary solution due to limited supply even if they all worked and didn't explode (that happened twice).
Sbreng, sbrang, sbreng (guitar + flanger +echo) piri-pi-pirippi-pi-piri-pi-pirippi (guitar thrumming "muffled" with the shirt sleeve) Et Volià the intro music is done!
@Everyday Astronaut thats a good and funny learning about this mission
Congratulations
Hope you get 5M subscribers
Proton platform is going to the moon! Way to go Rocketlab and Peter Beck!
Methinks they will be spending a bit repairing the launch platform after a dry launch. The shots of the smoking pad apres launch looked ominous. I also thought the water deluge was to cut down on noise as well?
It's hard to get excited at the vehicle not exploding on launch knowing it'll will still explode on re-entry and be wasted anyway.
right at takeoff it looked a little scary as it tilted a bit to the side... is that normal? I figured they'd clear the tower before starting to pitch down range.
Yeah it's normal for this rocket.
@Prowler Cam Where is said strap on booster? The Solar Explorer launch was an Atlas 5 with a single side booster... but this one?
So that call in was an automated conference call call in that someone programmed into their Skype or outlook so it calls you when the thing starts. My company uses the same conference call system and it happens all the time.
Pointy end up.....that's nominal.
That video was brought to you with code by Boeing.
even broken clocks are right twice a day
Loved the video! Lucky it didnt turn out like CRS Orb-3
Let people know, a launch less about up than it is about going around.
Spotted ISS 10 mins ago. Also, as you said, I was expecting to see Cygnus chasing behind it. Some satellite, dimmer than ISS, came behind the ISS, approximately on the same path, but about 5 mins after ISS disappeared. So, they were around 8-10 mins apart. Could that be the Cygnus? I am confused with the separation angle. 🤔
Happy to hear we are the same age. Go 1985 .
Nothing beats real live video footage of a rocket separating it's stages please don't compare the two. 😉
WHAT did I just see in an ad (for "Rotating Globes"?) that had YOU in a bowling alley, clad in a spacesuit using planet earth as your ball?! What the heck was THAT about?
Everyday Astronaut started as an art project of me taking pictures of myself in a space suit! You can find pictures online 👍
@@EverydayAstronaut From weird artist to groundbreaking space journalist, Tim you have got to write a book.
Given the lack of onboard cameras, they seem to giving away a lot of wow marketing and general community support.
Jim Bledsoe they prefer to give politicians the money directly.
I already had lunch...2 shakes & food has me ready for nap.
There most definitely was something off-norminal with the water deluge and dampening system..... LOOK AT THE FENCE, OFF TO THE RIGHT AT 47:00 !!!!!!!!
Maybe I'm wrong about the water deluge system,,, but I definitely don't think they were meaning to blow that fence down with the exhaust like they did here today.
javier olguin - Who knows, maybe they wanted that fence taken down...
@everydayastronaut why do you refer to the animation glitch as the kraken? I am really struggling to find out.
It too bad they dont do a live video. Id love to see what a solid rocket booster would look like in vacuum!! If theres any difference between a srb and liquid fuel
Have a freaking meet and greet at Florida Institute of Technology since the launch was delayed!
Not sure that that 1st few seconds of liftoff was nominal. Definitely was trying to give that strongback a kiss goodbye...
Pitchover nominal
Hi Tim
Nominal drinking game confirmed.
feeling drunk already ;-)
NG, the king of 2nd stage issues, luckily they are not involved with JWST. oh wait...
Sorry Tim this one's awkward.
33:10 t-1:00
Norminal!
isnt there anything more than cartoons to prove it went anywhere other thank wrecking in the brazillian jungle?
They don't "have" to be reusable, but like EV's if companies don't change they are going to be out of business.
34:14 did it tilted a little bit?
What is this, the UFC? whats the point of having a countdown timer if youre just going to hide it once it gets to the time where people will actually be watching the timer..?
I hate it when they don't land the rocket!!
As of now, they don't need to. The cost of launch of this rocket isn't too expensive.
SpaceX is the only launch provider that can do that.
@@odysseusrex5908 oh really!! C'mon!
I just don't get it why other already existing companies don't land their rockets they keep sticking to the old ways of launching rockets and wreck them. Why destroy them, when with a little more effort, you can get them back and reuse. It's just stupid to see only SpaceX does this.
@@Aluminator82 It's not a matter of just snapping your fingers and landing a rocket. that will take years of research and development to achieve, and when you do, SpaceX is already the dominant player in the industry. Just having a reusable rocket doesn't give you any advantage over them, especially when, by that time, you have something comparable to the Falcon 9 and they are flying Starship.
I think it would be nice when there was 30 seconds before launch you wouldnt say anything. Its at that moment you dont need any comments thanks for permitting me to comment
Northop Grummen…… and it didn't crash !?!? amazing.
MpowerdAPE - Northrop-Grumman is not Boeing!
@@TraditionalAnglican Don't work so hard dude, NG has a PR department. They will assure us that the bolts were screwed on properly...… go back to sleep.
MpowerdAPE - We’ll be assured the thing has been screwed together correctly by its payload reaching the desired orbit. Unlike Boeing DM-1, this one should actually reach the ISS.
@@TraditionalAnglican broken clock, twice a day etc etc etc...
@@MpowerdAPE Hey Jackass, did you forget Grumman made Apollo Lunar module? If they have worked properly then why do you have problem with this?
why do they use a mix of metric and imperial in commentary and visuals? isn't space stuff officially all defined in metric units?
Because you don't want to offend anyone.
It's an American launch company, catering their broadcast to Americans.
Victor, Baikal
how did they compete against spacex when musk reuse half of the rocket?
NASA wanted two independent providers, so if either of them was grounded for any reason they would still have access. Thus, they didn't have to compete with SpaceX, just with everybody else. I bet you that in five years, when Starship has rendered every other launch vehicle and spacecraft in the world obsolete, NG, Boeing, and Sierra Nevada will all still have their contracts for commercial crew and supply, for that very reason.
In 25 years they might not even be launching rockets there’s a chance for a new propulsion. You will be saying I remember watching rockets being launched. Grand kids be like yeah that’s so old school. Of course we have come full circle from launching rockets in the 60s to launching rockets in the 2020s. So who knows
They never stopped launching rockets, they have always launched rockets. We might get space elevators some day, but not in 25 years.
I believe the Earth is flat and I must be right because I got a good deal buying the Brookline bridge😁
Just don't buy the one in Brooklyn.
Electron isn't cute, it's just smaller boned.
I agree, it's a badass looking little space needle!
Did the main booster return and land like space x and did they catch the fairings
Michael Hays - SpaceX has made something no one else does (landing an orbital class booster) look easy.
No other orbital launcher returns, lands, and is reused. No other company has even attempted this. Zero, zip, nada. :)
Ditto for fairings.
@@donjones4719 Rocket Lab is preparing for recovering their Electron boosters, though, so, at least there's that. Oh, and an upcoming New Glenn, but it's not flying yet.
@@caav56 True. Although the Electron will not actually return and land, but control it's reentry and be caught mid-air by parachute. I love that RL is doing this, and there are sound reasons this is the right approach for reusing that size rocket. (Details included for Michael Hays.)
Will be interested to see Blue Origin's New Glen make their landing attempts in 2021. Their approach is similar to SpaceX but it took SpaceX quite a few tries to successfully land. Michael H, don't be misled by Blue Origin's ability to land their suborbital New Shepard rocket. Its reentry speed is a small fraction of an orbital booster's speed; landing one of these is in easy reach of any company that wants to.
It's important to note, in this thread about a Northrup Grumman launch, that no major established launcher builder is developing SpaceX style landing. 3 U.S. companies are in serious development of new rockets, none of which can land. Arianna Space has talked of the need to build one, but no real development done. Don't know if the Russians are working on anything, but doubt they have the financial resources. *But* the Chinese are definitely working on this, although details are scarce.
I take it you're trolling.
It's no Falcon 9 but it works 🙂
maybe they called the kraken LOL!
No sonic boom
Has anyone made a graph showing public attention, by way of TH-cam metrics of rocket launch's, I don't think this poor little rocket getting to much attention by the public, unlike SpaceX. I think a good graph might help the bean counters understand better, that the way Grandpa made rockets is coming to an end.
@Prowler Cam
It's kinda NASA fault in a way for decades they drum it in to us how important reusable was because of the space shuttle. Apollo will always be a milestone in human history, but from that point on the public just see them as rerun on TV, the space shuttle was two steps forward and one step back on a good day. Elon and associates fulfill the old NASA reusable mantra.
@Prowler Cam
For me, it was those giant bottle rockets on the sides. Yep Shuttle was nothing like the original design they show us first. Got to give the engineer credit for making it work at all.
I did the nominal drinking game
And did not survive
Around 52:00 you're saying so much nonsense 😂
In 10 years SpaceX will be giving free rocket rides to non-profit Science-based Space experiments.
I know you do the podcast thing but I think you would find that a similar setup to Scott Manley or SpaceXcentric would be far far more popular.
He's traveling, not at home in his regular studio. And he has far far more subscribers that SpaceXcentric, has been doing this much longer (all due respect to Kevin).
It made it 😕💞😉
Balloon
Max Q
American astronaut have to learn Russian ,is that real ,if yes then why?
It is real, and this is also the case for ESA astronauts. They have to do so, because atm the only launcher able to bring human to the iss is the russian Soyouz.
@@spenlaprincipale4652so after dragon2 functional flight it will be no longer?
@@praveenchoudhary9956 hard to say but it is possible.
@@spenlaprincipale4652 I think all flight crew, from all countries, have to know both Russian and English so that they ca communicate with each other and with both mission control centers.
@@odysseusrex5908 All ISS crew to be specific. Because ISS has a Russian end and a US end, with the same 3 to 7 people doing all the work on any given day.
What an absolute bore Tim! No in-flight telemetry and video. Even the ground based video was boring. I'll stick with SpaceX.
That must he te ugliest Rocket ever
This must be the worst grammar ever
Choad rocket
@@jakefromstatefarm8545 No, just bad spelling, and punctuation.
exAMEN 🌈 FIRM'amen'T,
the Sun needs oxygen to breathe, my brothers anD sisters are going to figure it out.
Americans tax dollars pays for Mars Mis'Sions,
The government spaces out with your tax money while you're hard at work.
Psalm 19:1 The heavens declare the glory of God; and the firmament sheweth his handywork.
Job 38:4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.
Obviously you did not notice you were watching a cartoon, that is not even real! WTF is wrong with people not to see this? smh
Stop it with the metric crap ..... The world is abandoning this aberration!
... this is a joke, right?
Michael Domansky - I assume this is a joke...
Your joke wasn't that great.
Man, this is rocket science, not Home Depot
Umm, no, no they're not.