Holy Artillery | The M7 Priest

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 เม.ย. 2024
  • The M7 Priest Howitzer Motor Carriage, distinct from traditional tanks, merged a formidable 105mm howitzer with the Sherman tank platform, resulting in a highly mobile artillery vehicle. Serving as a versatile artillery platform on the battlefields of WWII, it played a pivotal role in America's mechanization of modern warfare, demonstrating unparalleled adaptability and firepower. Its second iteration, the M7B2, was also used successfully during the Korean War.
    1. 105mm howitzer: The M7 Priest was equipped with a powerful 105mm M2 howitzer, providing it with significant firepower on the battlefield.
    2. Mobility: Built on a modified M3 medium tank chassis, the M7 Priest was highly mobile, allowing it to maneuver across various terrains and keep pace with advancing troops.
    3. Crew Composition: The crew typically consisted of a commander, driver, gunner, loader, and assistant driver and radio operator, each with specific roles in operating the vehicle and its artillery.
    4. Versatility: The M7 Priest served multiple roles on the battlefield, including direct fire support for infantry and armored units, artillery barrage against enemy positions, and even as a mobile command post.
    5. Artillery Support: With its howitzer capable of firing high-explosive shells, smoke rounds, and even anti-tank rounds, the M7 Priest provided crucial artillery support to ground forces, suppressing enemy positions and fortifications.
    6. Adaptability: As the war progressed, the M7 Priest saw various modifications and upgrades to enhance its performance and address evolving battlefield needs, showcasing its adaptability to changing circumstances.
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 99

  • @laughingowl7896
    @laughingowl7896 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

    "If there's ever a Priest in your area, you'd best say your prayers." Nice. I'm an Infantry vet, and while we'd sometimes dust it up with the gun bunnies at the bar, I never forgot "A battery of field artillery is worth a thousand muskets." -William Tecumseh Sherman

    • @DB-yj3qc
      @DB-yj3qc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      In my youthful infantry days, "we" mainly kept on friendly terms with the gun bunnies... they would be running P.T. with 155 training rounds. Great to have your back in a fight.... especially when it was with D.A.T's n scouts or M.P.s. 😂

  • @johnmcguigan7218
    @johnmcguigan7218 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

    The artillery was the one branch of the Army (not counting the Army Air Force) that excelled above anything the Axis powers had. Artillery spotting and coordination was excellent, the 155mm Long Tom was unparalleled, and the advent of the proximity fuse at the end of 1944 put our artillery in a class that belonged to the future. Time and again, our ground forces were saved by timely and accurate artillery fire that the Germans couldn't hope to match.

  • @Chilly_Billy
    @Chilly_Billy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

    Excellent video. Armor and Infantry get most of the glory and history books, but Artillery remains the God of War.

  • @KA-dx2kz
    @KA-dx2kz 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    The Americans had a priest while the British grabbed a bishop

    • @hulkkrogan420
      @hulkkrogan420 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Smack my bishop!

  • @doughudgens9275
    @doughudgens9275 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    For brevity, he skipped who did the calculations on which direction and elevation to point the tubes to fire. The howitzer should never see the enemy, the forward observers do. They give a target location, and the Fire Direction Center knows where the battery is located so it can compute the data needed to get rounds on target. I suspect the battery FDC did the calculations and the battalion FDC managed who gets support. They would say infantry company X gets direct support from artillery battery Y. This means the FO with X calls directly to Y’s FDC with targets in need of servicing. One of the US Army’s strengths in WWII was the ability to mass fires from multiple Battalions with very little effort. A division commander could decide he wanted all his artillery to support one objective with their fires. So something like 70-odd tubes of his Division artillery could fire on one target with a few radio calls (assuming all are within range). If Corps Artillery assets were used, you could almost double that number. The mobility of the Priest is what allowed this massing of fires.

  • @gsr4535
    @gsr4535 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Artillery's importance is often overlooked. 👍

  • @Gundoctor913A
    @Gundoctor913A วันที่ผ่านมา

    Wilcox is fantastic at telling these stories and describing these machines! Excellent dry humor, smooth speech and obvious knowledge.

  • @pauld6967
    @pauld6967 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    You absolutely nailed the motif. 😎
    I have long thought the M7 didn't get the attention and love it deserves. Thank you for covering it.

    • @DougthebearRichards
      @DougthebearRichards 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Lot of vehicle for a 105mm weapon, and wasn't particularly good in direct fire against point targets, and didn't have a radio.
      The M3/M5 light tanks should have been adaptable for the 105mm howitzer role, as the Germans did with the Wespe.

    • @pauld6967
      @pauld6967 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@DougthebearRichards Not having an integral radio would be a drawback if it operated independently but that is not how they were employed doctrinally.
      Other vehicles received and passed along targeting information to them.
      As for direct fire, well that isn't their intended role. Howitzers and mortars are designed to do indirect, arcing fire.

  • @rhietpas
    @rhietpas 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    Loved the dry sense of humor. Great work

  • @elijahschwindt7403
    @elijahschwindt7403 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Love the various vehicles! Looks like they'd be packed in tight. Also, the 40k Rhinos made my day 😊

    • @brianwynne6835
      @brianwynne6835 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Lol I use half tracks in my 40k guard army as open topped chimeras

  • @itsmethelauri1183
    @itsmethelauri1183 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    HANS GET MOVING! THE M7 VIDEO IS HERE!

  • @davidk7324
    @davidk7324 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    Well done, Mr. Wilcox. Thanks to you and your team.

    • @philbosworth3789
      @philbosworth3789 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hello again sir. @davidk7324

    • @davidk7324
      @davidk7324 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@philbosworth3789 Hi Phil!

  • @Blutgang
    @Blutgang หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I like the use of Rhinos in your table talk. Epic choice.

    • @NMMV_USA
      @NMMV_USA  7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thank your for noticing :)

  • @alankjosness2093
    @alankjosness2093 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My father was an early draftee because, I think, his secondary schooling in a polytechnic highschool. In early '42 he began learning the trade of artillary observation involving the M7. This was at Camp Roberts in the Mojave Desert. His unit - the 62nd Armored Field Artillary Battalion - boarded ship for North Africa in November 1942. From there the unit travelled through North Africa, Sicily, England, D Day on Omaha Beach, across France, Belgium and into Germany. The M7, (known as the Priest to one of our allies), and her crews, served with destiction throughout the Second World War.

  • @ScottBerrier-ir3pw
    @ScottBerrier-ir3pw 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Look for the Book “Honor Untarnished” by GEN (R) Don Bennett. He commanded a SP Art Bn on D-Day; equipped with the M7 Priest. His chapter on D-Day is a must read for everyone. He was also one of the youngest Bn Commanders during the war. Inspiring leader for sure.

  • @Kottery
    @Kottery 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hmmm, those little "Priests" sure look like METAL BAWKSES

  • @greymatter6834
    @greymatter6834 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I like the buffalo cap. Good show. 07

  • @kellywright540
    @kellywright540 หลายเดือนก่อน

    My Dad was a scout for the 66th Armored Field Artillery Battalion in Patton's favorite Armored Division, the 4th. I used to think that he was a tanker when I was younger because that's what comes to mind when you think of Patton's Third Army. Needless to say that when I asked him what type of tank he rode around in, he said that he mainly traveled around in a jeep paired up with a tank, which for a kid in grade school sounded pretty boring. Later on I understood the part he played in the 4th Armored Division and as my uncle said, "The whole damn world was at war and there's your Dad, driving around in a jeep, looking for trouble!" He fought in the breakout of Normandy, Northern France, the Ardennes, the Rhineland with a stop at the Buchenwald concentration camps and then into Czechoslovakia at the end of the war.

  • @ajstephen3977
    @ajstephen3977 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Great video and i definitely approve of your hat.

  • @kevinkelly6524
    @kevinkelly6524 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    This was so informative and educational. Well done

  • @patrickmcintyre8023
    @patrickmcintyre8023 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I just found one of these at the Tennessee National Guard in Union City. I meant to get back to it to take some pictures, but that's going to wait for my next trip out there.

  • @MagicalMuffin12
    @MagicalMuffin12 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Another great video! Feels conversational and I understood what was going on, which is great since I’m not a history buff!

  • @cameronhilburn5628
    @cameronhilburn5628 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Incredible video! Looking forward to more fantastic content from your museum

  • @longrider42
    @longrider42 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Yep, we folks living in Wyoming, of which I am one. Are proud of where we live, and we want others, specially those we intend to Un-Alive, to know it :) Yep, SPG's very useful things.

  • @thurin84
    @thurin84 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    this was fascinating. never saw a video about this subject. bravo!

  • @misterstanley6161
    @misterstanley6161 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Great video, super informative and easy to listen to as I was making my breakfast this morning! 😊

  • @davidholtz6590
    @davidholtz6590 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thank you for a solid understand of M7s.

  • @yannichudziak9942
    @yannichudziak9942 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Epic rhino’s for the win ;)

  • @davidlavigne207
    @davidlavigne207 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Excellent descriptions of the M7 and its variants. I also appreciated the breakdown of how the batteries were organized and how they operated during both in offense and defense. The best part was the duties of the crew as described by the host. Artillery in WW2, as it was in WW1 was the largest producer of enemy casualties by far. It was the one arm that the U.S. Army got right overall.

    • @philbosworth3789
      @philbosworth3789 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Hello again @davidlavigne207

  • @Sethoates101
    @Sethoates101 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great video

  • @larryselkirk426
    @larryselkirk426 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That you for that overview of the Priest.

  • @woodyjm61
    @woodyjm61 5 วันที่ผ่านมา

    King of Battle

  • @kalaharimine
    @kalaharimine 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Excellent presentation. Thank you.

  • @akman1947
    @akman1947 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    We need a video on that quad 50 with an/m2s that is terrifying!

  • @Minirafter0002
    @Minirafter0002 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Where are the other 7 Hanks for reference? I need to see it fully crewed.

  • @ryanknott7562
    @ryanknott7562 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We had one of these in our local park. I grew up playing on it.

  • @TheJimmyplant
    @TheJimmyplant 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Wow, the writing is exceptional. Very welld one.

    • @NMMV_USA
      @NMMV_USA  7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Thank you!

  • @Legitpenguins99
    @Legitpenguins99 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Man, I've found a gold mine with this channel. I hope and think your channel starts to blow up considering there have been a couple of popular videos

    • @NMMV_USA
      @NMMV_USA  7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Welcome aboard!

  • @yoface2537
    @yoface2537 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Why did the Canadians make the kangaroo, that sounds like an Australian thing

  • @kmoecub
    @kmoecub 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hold on.... Do my eyes spy Warhammer Epic 40K (now Horus Heresy) minis?!

  • @chrispierdominici3891
    @chrispierdominici3891 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great stuff, thanks for an interesting and engaging video!

    • @NMMV_USA
      @NMMV_USA  2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @matthewrussell9417
    @matthewrussell9417 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Superb!

  • @lyleslaton3086
    @lyleslaton3086 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Artillery: King of Battle.

  • @Salamandra40k
    @Salamandra40k 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Jeez you guys need more subscribers. Amazing videos

  • @DB-yj3qc
    @DB-yj3qc 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for a informative video

  • @sailordude2094
    @sailordude2094 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks, great channel! These were featured in the TV show, The Rat Patrol (as German tanks, lol).

  • @philbosworth3789
    @philbosworth3789 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That was a very informative episode again.

  • @rgriffinRETIRED_SHEEPDOG
    @rgriffinRETIRED_SHEEPDOG 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video!

  • @robertmorey4104
    @robertmorey4104 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very cool, queen of battle. Artillery. Nice and detailed, well done.

    • @PavewayJDAM
      @PavewayJDAM 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Infantry Queen of Battle. Artillery is KING.

  • @Thirdbase9
    @Thirdbase9 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    King of Battle!

  • @thomasmitchell7645
    @thomasmitchell7645 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A very informative video! Thanks to your videos "advertising" the museum, I'll be visiting there this fall. Only one small point. Dice is the plural, die is the singular.

  • @mearalain3006
    @mearalain3006 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bien joué. Greetings

  • @robgleadall-cc8gn
    @robgleadall-cc8gn 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Sexton and Kangaroo are actually based on the Canadian Ram tank... A fascinating bit of tank history in itself. Great video I have always found the M3/M4 and it's variants fascinating.

  • @darylnelson3026
    @darylnelson3026 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I believe the Canadian Army of World War 2 was the first Army to be fully mechanized .The Saxon was Canadian made , based off the Ram tank chassis that based off the M3 Lee chassis

  • @phil20_20
    @phil20_20 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In the beginning, there was the self-propelled slinger!

  • @DougthebearRichards
    @DougthebearRichards 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The Birch Gun comes to mind long before the M7 Priest.

    • @nickraschke4737
      @nickraschke4737 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      US war history..never let the truth get in the way of a good story.

  • @mtstans
    @mtstans 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great stuff! Was that the same gun that was also used on the 105 sherman dozer?

  • @JENKEM1000
    @JENKEM1000 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Towards the end, he contrasts the US HMCs that were used for mainly indirect fire, with direct-fire assault guns such as StuG and SU-122... completely ignoring the soviet "triplex artillery" concept that the SU-122 fit into. Soviet SPGs of that era were not just assault guns, they did plenty of indirect fire missions as well, in addition to being an antitank weapon.

  • @lil_tequito
    @lil_tequito 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What were casualties like in this field? I’d imagine later in the war the rate must’ve been pretty low as they weren’t retreating all too much

  • @jean-francoislemieux5509
    @jean-francoislemieux5509 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    they did shoot a lot in korea! how long would the barrel survive?

  • @curtisbryce5096
    @curtisbryce5096 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Weren't the majority of military deaths caused by artillery and mortar fire?

    • @Chilly_Billy
      @Chilly_Billy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not among submarine crews. 😉😆

    • @maxstr
      @maxstr 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Still is

    • @curtisbryce5096
      @curtisbryce5096 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@Chilly_Billy Wasn't depth charges and the famous Hedgehog a naval form of mortars?

  • @kmoecub
    @kmoecub 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Forgive me Father, for I have sinned. Forgive them not, for they have done far worse.

  • @VintageWanderer
    @VintageWanderer 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How heavy was each complete shell?

  • @kellywright540
    @kellywright540 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I do have a question, could the gun be lowered enough to be used for direct fire for, let's say, a pillbox or a house?

  • @Panzerkampfwagen_Tiger_Ausf_ll
    @Panzerkampfwagen_Tiger_Ausf_ll 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Question, am I aloud to enter the tanks on display without being an employee please answer

    • @NMMV_USA
      @NMMV_USA  7 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

      Generally no. But, a few days a year we have "climb in in a tank day." Follow the FB feed to catch those announcements.

    • @Panzerkampfwagen_Tiger_Ausf_ll
      @Panzerkampfwagen_Tiger_Ausf_ll 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Also if I were to join the museum/become an employee would I be able to enter it?

  • @richardmeyeroff7397
    @richardmeyeroff7397 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I suggest that you slow your delivery it will allow the people listening to better follow what you are saying.

  • @craigmorris4083
    @craigmorris4083 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sorry, but I believe it was logistics that won the war.

  • @stephenbritton9297
    @stephenbritton9297 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    No, logistics won the war.

  • @chelseachelseaboy
    @chelseachelseaboy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Sorry...did I hear you say America was the first to have mechanized artillery ....didn't the Germans have Wespe & Hummel ??

  • @stevenyouel8614
    @stevenyouel8614 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    He makes a claim that the US was the first country in the world "to mechanized their artillery." Germans used their own self-propelled artillery in the Battle of France 1940 (Bison sig 33 using a 15 cm infantry gun on panzer 1 chassis).

    • @itsmethelauri1183
      @itsmethelauri1183 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s crazy, I’ve seen a lot of pictures of horses dragging German artillery through just about all parts of the war. Don’t know if I’d call that “fully mechanized” but hey, I’m not the one working at a museum.

    • @chelseachelseaboy
      @chelseachelseaboy 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wespe & Hummel as well.

    • @davidk7324
      @davidk7324 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Interesting. Wikipedia indicates that just 38 of these were produced by the Nazis and they were last deployed in 1943. Horses (~2.5 million) remained widely used for transport by the Germans throughout the war, I believe.

  • @johnfrench1239
    @johnfrench1239 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Slooooooow down buddy! Good content but exhausting to listen to!

    • @videodistro
      @videodistro 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Actually it was nice not to have to run at 1.25 speed. A little more white space can be nice, but the pace didn't waste my time, either.

  • @2serveand2protect
    @2serveand2protect 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    PS. GREAT STUFF! Thank You for uploading! ;) :)

  • @2serveand2protect
    @2serveand2protect 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What do you mean by "BASE" charge ?? ...as in "BASE-BLEED" or just "BASE" as "REGULAR" ?? ...and what the hell's a "25-pounder" ?? What caliber would that be??

  • @2serveand2protect
    @2serveand2protect 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Gotta give it t the Americans! ...while 70-80 % of the "pack" of the German artillery was still relying on HORSES (even by '44) - and the same went for the Soviets ... Americans had EVERYTHING (100%) MOTORIZED! The vehicle in itself might not look as something particularily "great" ...but it gives you a good idea about how much POWERFUL the "industrial muscle" of the US Army was!

  • @buttslane4491
    @buttslane4491 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    When you say 'fully mechanise' its artillery, what do you mean exactly? The US Army used plenty of towed artillery, so not all was SP guns.