48:00 What you are missing is that the above place is much much more pleasant to be in compared to the huuuuuuge parking waste on the bottom. A city does not need to be navigable by sattelite, but by foot. In fact, car centricity is the opposite of efficient, pleasant, social and sustainable architecture. I do not mean to be impolite, but everything you showed here is just hellishly dystopian. None are pleasant, or green places to be. You - and your discipline - seem to think of people as unity of production and logistics. Nothing you showed here respects and accommodates the social nature of humans.
For real... You gave a parking lot as an example for good architecture? I came here to learn more about modern architecture, because although I hate it, I might be wrong and wanted to understand it better. Now I just hate it even more.
Patrik, I feel like your definition of the architect spills into planning. Care to expand
First
48:00 What you are missing is that the above place is much much more pleasant to be in compared to the huuuuuuge parking waste on the bottom. A city does not need to be navigable by sattelite, but by foot. In fact, car centricity is the opposite of efficient, pleasant, social and sustainable architecture. I do not mean to be impolite, but everything you showed here is just hellishly dystopian. None are pleasant, or green places to be. You - and your discipline - seem to think of people as unity of production and logistics. Nothing you showed here respects and accommodates the social nature of humans.
For real... You gave a parking lot as an example for good architecture? I came here to learn more about modern architecture, because although I hate it, I might be wrong and wanted to understand it better. Now I just hate it even more.