Vt4 is completly competently build tank made with affordability in mind. It only cost around 1.5 milion compared to 10 milion for Abrams You guys just post propaganda
Just because it’s cheap doesn’t mean it’s reliable the Abrams is that price cause of the engineering and equipment put into it to make it survive combat and be reliable
If u knew anything u would know cost isnt an issue but rather a concern 1.5 is very cheap for a tank to cheap and chinia has a very large miltary in manpower it cares less about its combat losses its miltary tech is largely untested and has no clue how it will hold up in combat the Abrams has went up in cost over the years due to the upgrades in new tech that's been added since and the Abrams is from the 80s that's a testament to its reliability not to mention eveyone wants an Abrams I would say the t-72 is a better then the Chinese tanks not to mention us is great at logistics and maintenance and that's y the Abrams cost so much a tank is a tank and can be destroyed but it's not often u see Russian tankers getting out without the ejection of the turrets quite often and if I'm not mistaken chinia went with an atuo loader on there tanks so in turn will.have the same problem u see Abrams crews escaping a cook off more often the new tank the us plans on pushing out is very high tech cost 24 mil
Vt4 is completly competently build tank made with affordability in mind. It only cost around 1.5 milion compared to 10 milion for Abrams
You guys just post propaganda
Just because it’s cheap doesn’t mean it’s reliable the Abrams is that price cause of the engineering and equipment put into it to make it survive combat and be reliable
What is propaganda on shit cheap tank breaking down? This piece of scrap metal would be torn apart by quality German leopard.
@@vaclavsovak3183 its not suposed to 1v1 a leopard
If u knew anything u would know cost isnt an issue but rather a concern 1.5 is very cheap for a tank to cheap and chinia has a very large miltary in manpower it cares less about its combat losses its miltary tech is largely untested and has no clue how it will hold up in combat the Abrams has went up in cost over the years due to the upgrades in new tech that's been added since and the Abrams is from the 80s that's a testament to its reliability not to mention eveyone wants an Abrams I would say the t-72 is a better then the Chinese tanks not to mention us is great at logistics and maintenance and that's y the Abrams cost so much a tank is a tank and can be destroyed but it's not often u see Russian tankers getting out without the ejection of the turrets quite often and if I'm not mistaken chinia went with an atuo loader on there tanks so in turn will.have the same problem u see Abrams crews escaping a cook off more often the new tank the us plans on pushing out is very high tech cost 24 mil
😂😂😂😂
😂😂😅😅😅😊
😂😂😂😂😂