Michael Jordan 1995: 39 Points v Orlando Magic Conference Semis Game 5 - "Space Jams"

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 15 ก.ย. 2024
  • There is a myth that Michael Jordan did not play well in the 1995 Playoffs. When he came back from retirement with 17 games left in the regular season, most people (including me) expected the Bulls to win the 1995 NBA Championship. When they didn't, some people thought that Jordan's performance in the playoffs was disappointing.
    But the truth is that Jordan had an incredible playoffs that year. He averaged 31.5 points on 48.4% FG% 36.7 3P%, 81% FT%, 6.5 rebounds, 4.5 Assists, 2.3 Steals and 1.3 blocks in the Playoffs.
    Wearing a pair of Air Jordan 11 "Space Jams", Jordan scored 39 points on 15-28 shooting, 4 rebounds, 2 assists, 2 steals and 2 blocks. But the Magic won the game despite Jordan's greatness.
    MJ had some uncharacteristic turnovers in Game 1 and 6, but that shouldn't take away from his brilliant performance in the series. Personally, I think the Bulls lost this playoff series because they double teamed Shaq too much, leaving players like Horace Grant wide open all series. In 1996 when the Bulls swept the Magic, the Bulls didn't double Shaq and players like Grant, Dennis Scott and Nick Anderson were held in check because they weren't left wide open.

ความคิดเห็น • 129

  • @jaranarm
    @jaranarm 11 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    That's ridiculous. Look at his playoff numbers. In the 95 playoffs he was averaging 48.4% shooting, which was better than the last season he played and better than every season after that. I can't understand why people just can't admit that the Magic were simply the better team that year and there was no way the Bulls would have gotten past them unless they got a good inside player, and that player would be Dennis Rodman.

    • @chilling8987
      @chilling8987 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Idiot. u use far smaller sample size. u compare a 10 game sample size in 1995 to 16 in 1996, 19 in 1997 and 21 in 1998.
      Jordan was rusty in 1995 it goes byond stats, watch those games for uself please.

  • @popeyeisgood
    @popeyeisgood 13 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    in that very short season of his come back he shows amazing speed and quickness that reminds me of his pre 93 games. he is more showy in some of those drives and dunks then the way he played overall in 93. perhaps it is a statement of how well he can still play.

  • @jaranarm
    @jaranarm 11 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    The biggest difference maker was DENNIS RODMAN.

    • @B.R.LoveJr
      @B.R.LoveJr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thk you thts true

    • @gmac_sports
      @gmac_sports ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope the difference was MJ had a full season if MJ comeback at the start of the 94-95 season they beat Orlando as is

    • @Nootz23
      @Nootz23 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It can be both. Rodman was a huge difference, but Jordan gassed out at the end of games in the '95 playoffs, something that never really happened . They lost games 1, 3 and 6 down the stretch. Jordan was always in great condition, but here, not being in top basketball condition cost them this series

  • @dynamic6645
    @dynamic6645 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "mj was rusty" LOOOOLLL

  • @snakekingification
    @snakekingification 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    all u guys have valid points I was sick to my stomach seeing Bulls struggle in 95 but horace was the factor and in the off season gettin rodman made the difference

  • @williamburney3166
    @williamburney3166 ปีที่แล้ว

    He made Nick Anderson fall with the crossover and then dunked with the left hand, MJ was a different kinda animal 🐐

  • @jordanlover23
    @jordanlover23 13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    His speed here at age 32 is ridiculous. Love how he drops Nick Anderson to the floor with the in-and-out dribble and explosion at the 27 second mark. Then again blazing speed at 41 seconds as he somehow gets baseline past Shaq despite Shaq being like 9 feet off of him. The number of adjustments and the speed with which he makes them on the play at 3:20 is amazing. Catches it, realizes Penny's overplaying towards his right side, so he fakes it and comes back left, and then to the right again

  • @Thekingpac2014
    @Thekingpac2014 12 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Exactly!!!The same happened to Orlando the next season in '96,Grant got injured and had no person that could out-rebound Rodman.

  • @shutterbugblues
    @shutterbugblues 12 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thank you. I've been trying to argue these facts with Jordan jockers on TH-cam for a long time and they won't listen. They still follow the same storyline of "MJ was just rusty and got his revenge the next year". These people have fan minds and don't know basketball. It seems that they've been watching too much Space Jam or been reading too much Bill Simmons. Perhaps both.
    The Bulls lacked Horace Grant that year, period. Dennis Rodman was the key difference for 96 and beyond.

    • @Jordan23-G.O.A.T.
      @Jordan23-G.O.A.T. 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      How can you not take into account the fact that he took almost 2 years off without any basketball and came back with only 17 games left in the season and still threw up big numbers. His game was completely off and Rusty. He came back with a full training camp under him and dominated these very same Orlando Magic with Shaq and Penny in the team intact. Don't tell me only Dennis Rodman made a difference

    • @MrZackavelli
      @MrZackavelli 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      As a Bulls fan, Jordan jockers really grind my gears. Actually maybe it's because I'm a Bulls fan, because all of the players and coaches of those 6 championship teams are gods to me, and not just Jordan. The Jockers only give credit to one guy. They're too lazy to remember more than one name.

    • @MrZackavelli
      @MrZackavelli 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @1995 GetJiggyWitIt Excuses, excuses.

    • @hotstuff1167
      @hotstuff1167 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Jordan dropped 55 in a regular season game that year. But he’s real rusty right

    • @ethanjobson3879
      @ethanjobson3879 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Jordan23-G.O.A.T. Of course we take it into account. But Jordan not doing enough was clearly not the biggest factor in this series. Maybe you could say he underperformed somewhat in Game 6 but he was ridiculous this game and Bulls still lost, showing even if Jordan was at his best it was unlikely they'd win, as you couldn't have asked for much more from him in this game 5.

  • @mattelmore7148
    @mattelmore7148 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This game-and series-illustrates that no matter how good you are, championships are won by the best TEAM. A great comparison to this series is this year's Lakers-Thunder series, where the Lakers lost 4-1 despite Kobe averaging 31.2 ppg in the series

  • @m74d3
    @m74d3 9 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    He faked Nick Anderson right out of the universe at 26 seconds.

    • @glennmcgollie5221
      @glennmcgollie5221 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      rip to Nick Anderson lol

    • @premesupreme713
      @premesupreme713 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Mann what

    • @MrZackavelli
      @MrZackavelli 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      He had Jordan scrambling for his life in pure desperation mode in Game 6

  • @Jumpman1989
    @Jumpman1989 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Michael was a freaking beast during that playoffs!!! Anybody who thinks differently must be completely blind.
    He built up his shape so quickly after almost 2 years retirement, and even in regular season where he played only 17 games he was 10th or 11th in the MVP race.
    The only thing which I think was essential but in the Bulls team was still a little bit shaky was chemistry. They had to readjust the lineup, the situation inside changed so that was I think the main reason of loss in 1995

  • @gustavotriqui
    @gustavotriqui 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    In the Playoffs, he was averaging 31.5 points 6.4 rebounds and 4.8 assists. That's better numbers than his own Playoff numbers in 1996, when Bulls took the league by storm and won 72-10. It's better than his 1997 season too, and at least similar to 1998. Jordan wasn't "rusty" in 1995. He just had a worse team, and that's why he lost. When Jordan had better teammates, he won, when he didn't, he lost. Just like Bird, Magic, Kareem, Wilt, Bill Russell, Tim Duncan or any other great superstar.

    • @mrhoward19801
      @mrhoward19801 ปีที่แล้ว

      Numbers aren’t everything. He wasn’t even half of the defender that he was in 93 and 96. He also wasn’t consistent and he was committing turnovers. Numbers don’t always tell the whole strory

  • @bibssy
    @bibssy 13 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    it also helps that Grant was injured the following year and sat a couple of the games in the 96 playoffs. They didn't have a strong low post defender that year so they had to double. Mike actually played better in this series than he did in the series the year after but he had Rodman down low doing good job on shaq

  • @clutchcity25
    @clutchcity25 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Shout out to the doc for bringing me here. This Bulls team was supposed to see Hakeem and the Rockets in the finals, and that’s no disrespect to Shaq and Reggie Miller.

    • @jxn23
      @jxn23  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah it is such a shame that the Bulls couldn't have won game 3 and game 6. They had big leads in both games but couldn't hold on.
      Of all the Finals series I would have loved to see, it was Bulls v Rockets in 1995. Clyde and Hakeem v Jordan and Pippen. It would have been great to see

  • @ead838
    @ead838 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    '95 Jordan was still Air-Jordan in that short season. He lost some lift during the 2nd 3-peat years

    • @puckutubesux7356
      @puckutubesux7356 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      From what I can tell, the "lift" diminished more around 1990 after he put on weight.

    • @AQUAPHREESH193
      @AQUAPHREESH193 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@puckutubesux7356 lol lift as in his jumping ability? I know last dance emphasized how the pistons made him bulk up 😂

  • @Nikochan1313
    @Nikochan1313 9 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Nice point of view. I think people expected him to win the championship that year, but as for stats not bad at all .After this year he got bulkier and lost agility. Maybe he was concerned that he needed to change the way to play as he was getting older by becoming more a true post player.If you take a look at 96-97-98 seasons you see most of his FG come from post plays

    • @MrMezzie88
      @MrMezzie88 9 ปีที่แล้ว

      Right bro, and most were and1's

    • @mmcneil777
      @mmcneil777 8 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      +Nikochan1313 Very true about him getting bulkier. He didn't have that same explosion in his legs, but he was still 'Jordan'. He relied a lot on that fadeaway shot. Was surprised how much more explosive he was in this 95' series, even though he was still 'rusty' and had been out of the league for a year and half - which is a long time to be out of the NBA. He seemed slimmer in this series and can back in 96' having added a lot of muscle. He must have realized he was going to need to change some element of his game to get back on top. Pretty impressive stuff...

    • @RUMPELSTILTSKY
      @RUMPELSTILTSKY 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      +mikem987 I wonder what the top athletes in the world were using in the mid 90's? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.......................

  • @WorldwideJamal
    @WorldwideJamal 7 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I thought Stern burned these tapes.

    • @tearealdavis2212
      @tearealdavis2212 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I sure can’t find mjs turnover with 16 seconds left

  • @arkade2345
    @arkade2345 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    MJ actually had a ton of sick highlight moves in the 95 playoffs and played much better than people assume.His problem was 1. CONSISTENCY and 2. CONFIDENCE.Being away from the game for so long is a huge obstacle to overcome but he did it anyway.Gm 1 vs the Hornets was vintage 93 Jordan in every way.After that, you could tell his confidence was a little shaky & he was never able to really play consistent.The Magic series, he was like a roller coaster--miss a bunch of shots, then go on a tear.

    • @mrhoward19801
      @mrhoward19801 ปีที่แล้ว

      His probably was defense and yes consistency

  • @mmcneil777
    @mmcneil777 9 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Jordan actually looked pretty amazing after game 1. I was surprised at his performance in games 2-6. Game 1 of the Orlando series overshadowed, some pretty amazing moments, where a lot of the 'rust' was coming off of Jordan. I didn't realize he had those 'big games' later in the series. You can see the importance of Rodman, as without Grant at PF, they were missing an inside presence. Getting Rodman was the missing key to the puzzle of the continuation of the dynasty. I think if they had Grant or Rodman, they make it back to the NBA finals in 95'. I think the Rockets would have beat the Bulls that year, though, as Jordan was still in the process of getting the rust off and getting back into the swing of things. However, his performance, other then game 1, was actually pretty impressive and better then I remembered. At times he even seemed to have a little more spring in his legs and quickness, then his last 3 years as a Bull. However, the last 3 years he was back as "Jordan', running on all cylnders again.

    • @mmcneil777
      @mmcneil777 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** Very true. I think Jordan relied more on his team in the Seattle series, then any series he was in. He was back to his legendary self the next two Championship series against the Jazz. He had some great moments against Seattle, but it's the only series where he didn't have one of his truly 'iconic' moments. All the other series, had that signature play or plays - flu game, the shot, etc...

    • @mmcneil777
      @mmcneil777 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      ***** Good insights. I wasn't aware of the injury. Jordan was sort of 'old school' and didn't say anything about it - probably not wanting to give the Sonics an edge. I really felt Rodman was actually the MVP of the series, but was still fine with Jordan getting the MVP.

    • @ChrisM07
      @ChrisM07 7 ปีที่แล้ว

      He had a pretty good series overall, the Horace Grant-Toni Kukoc matchup was the difference obviously. That and Orlando getting a lot of open looks from Shaq getting double teamed.

    • @AntiMTVMovement
      @AntiMTVMovement 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think by the time the playoffs arrived in 1995, Jordan was his "old" self. However, the Bulls struggled against the Magic because the Charlotte series took a toll on them. Zo and LJ killed them.

    • @mrboo3049
      @mrboo3049 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      mikem 987.
      GOOD POINT
      even though GRANT never left THE BULLS
      and MJ cameback at retirement in 1995
      i would probably say THE BULLS will go back to THE FINALS
      RUSTY and ALL
      MJ was also Great
      in my estimation
      when JORDAN returned in 95. i didnt really expect that his performnce is VERY IMPRESSIVE
      here's a Guy that just suddenly CAME BACK after BASEBALL
      NO INTENSE TRAINING and COMPETITIVE CONDITIONING. just few warm ups. exercises when THE GAME is gonna play for 1 hour and just go out there and Do what he does Best. Do th e AIR JORDAN thing
      but not in his OLD SELF
      i would gave MJ a 85 to 80 percent here in that 1995 COMEBACK
      like BOB COSTAS said: THERE IS NO ONE IN THE ENTIRE PLANET or ATHLETE that can DO WHAT MJ did. a GUY JUST COME OUT OF RETIREMENT. PLAYED THE GAME WITH NO SUFFICIENT CONDITIONING.TRAINING but CAN STILL PERFORM AT A HIGH LEVEL EVEN THOUGH HIS RUSTY AND ALL.I DONT THINK ANY ATHLETE IN THE HISTORY OF SPORTS CAN ACHIEVE THAT KIND OF ACHIEVEMENT in their CAREER. THATS WHY MICHAEL MAYBE IS BORN. BETTER YET INBORN TO HAVE MADE THAT KIND OF ACHIEVEMENT in the HISTORY OF SPORTS..

  • @AHMAD-2324
    @AHMAD-2324 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    In this series although they loss he looked alot like the first 3PEAT version of Air Jordan. But he tried it just wasn't his time in '95 also the Bulls dodged a bullet IMO. Because had they made it to the Finals Houston would have beat them I feel very confident in saying that.

  • @RenzyTheGreat
    @RenzyTheGreat 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jordan stans need to just face the facts that he wasn't invincible and that he did lose some crucial games. The Magic was just a better team that year

  • @Silligk
    @Silligk 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    jordan still seems in his physical prime during the '95 playoffs...he does dunks/moves i dont see him do in the following seasons.

    • @1D4ever
      @1D4ever 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      He took it to the basket harder in this series than any since 91, he had more dunks this series than the entire 96 playoffs. His problem here was the supporting cast.

  • @Thebhoobhoo
    @Thebhoobhoo 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Did anyone notice that he's wearing the space jam 11's here it was officially released in 1996

    • @parridmaul1996
      @parridmaul1996 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Actually 2001 because at that time those were the only pair specifically for him in 1995 no one could get a pair at that time

  • @Thutmosis7
    @Thutmosis7 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Rodman was a difference maker i agree cuz he got inside shaq head alot. Also mailman and shawn kemp. He was a good rebounder and defender.

  • @iTzeXile13
    @iTzeXile13 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Dang even wearing the greatest shoes ever made... classic game for sure

  • @26bisket
    @26bisket 8 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    lol @ people saying Grant being injured was the reason the magic lost in 96........lmaoooooooooooooooooooooooo

    • @airgordo4
      @airgordo4 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It's not THE reason they lost but Grant going down and Chicago adding Rodman were HUGE changes for both teams in comparison to the 1995 series. Grant was dropping 18 and 11 on them in 95, to say losing him wasn't huge would be laughable.

    • @ranholic5027
      @ranholic5027 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@airgordo4 injuries are part of the game.. even if grant was not injured they will still lose to the bulls that year so who cares lol..

  • @jumpnam
    @jumpnam 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    To clarify he had 29 in the first half of Game 3, finishing with 40. He didn't top 30 in any half this series.
    His shooting was good in the series, but it was his conditioning that let him down. Late in games he didn't have the lift in his legs consistently, which contributed to the late turnovers and missed shots in Game 6. By his own admission, he was still in baseball shape. It wasn't that he played bad in the series, more that his timing was off and he couldn't close games out consistently.

  • @Jordan23-G.O.A.T.
    @Jordan23-G.O.A.T. 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    MJ only played 15 regular-season games fully and had almost 2 years off away from the game of basketball. He was very rusty and off and on with his game. If he would have had at least a good 5 months of training and the season, they would have won the championship that year. It's amazing that after getting a full summer training camp in he comes back and they dominate this Orlando team and sweep them

  • @jxn23
    @jxn23  13 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    @popeyeisgood Yeah I agree, the Magic played better as a team and the Bulls were trying to piece together a team that year and still didnt know where everyone fit in after MJ came back.
    I watched the whole series again just recently, and I couldnt believe how open the Magic players (especially Grant) were left for free throw line jump shots or cuts down the lane. I honestly believe the Bulls could've won this series though. They looked unbeatable during some games.

    • @robertmoore294
      @robertmoore294 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah I agree the bulls could've have won and went and face rockets.

  • @jordanlover23
    @jordanlover23 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jordan also shut down Penny in a couple of halves in this series, completely taking him out of the game. Even the commentators were saying that they had never seen Penny taken out of a game like that.

  • @Ldale11
    @Ldale11 11 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Jordan wasn't out of shape or 'rusty' or any of the other excuses you fake sports fans try to pull out of your ass. The Bulls got beat. Period. Jordan had several games of 30+, a 48 pt. game and even 55 points vs. one of the best defensive teams in the league in the Knicks after his comeback. Stop making excuses and man up.

  • @Thekingpac2014
    @Thekingpac2014 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Agreed
    Jordan's average in the '95 Playoffs:31.5ppg,4.5ast,6.5rebs,2.3stls,1.4blks&shot48%
    Jordan's average in the '96 Playoffs:30.7ppg,4.1ast,4.9rebs,1.8stls,0.3blks&shot45%
    Jordan's average against the Magic in the '95 Playoffs:31.0ppg,3.7ast,6.5rebs,2.5stls,1.8blks&shot47%
    Jordan's average against the Magic in the '96 Playoffs:29.5ppg,4.8ast,5.5rebs,2.3stls,0.8blks,&shot52%
    I believe Michael&Chicago could've faced Houston in the Finals if the had Rodman on their squad in '95.Mj had big help.

  • @arkade2345
    @arkade2345 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    [cont]...He could seem very tentative at times in the offense & sometimes looked a little scared to get the ball.Obv that is natural for someone who just returned & I think MJ did better than anyone else would have in that situation.But compared to his incredible standards, you could tell he wasn't quite the same. You saw flashes but he seemed hesitant, esp in crunch time.But I agree that people don't appreciate how amazing MJ did play in 95 & how incredible a feat it was to do what he did!

  • @popeyeisgood
    @popeyeisgood 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i mean the problem of looking at the stats without seeing the game is that some times these points and rebound a player got is in garbage time. i recently watched a 97 bulls vs sixers game with a description of ' despite the 44 point effort of iverson, the sixer falls short to overcome the bulls'
    if you watch the whole game, you understand that around( roughly) 40% of his 44 pts in that game is in the 4 qt when jordan was sitting down the whole time because of the big lead.

    • @ethanjobson3879
      @ethanjobson3879 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This was a close game throughout.

  • @jordanlover23
    @jordanlover23 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @jumpnam Like I said, I'm about 95% certain that he had a 35 point first half in a Chicago home game in that series, because I have it on tape somewhere and have watched it many times years ago. Game 3 is the only game it could have been given his point totals. I'm also pretty sure the second half of game 2 was also a 30+ point half. What game report are you accessing? Maybe I'll try to dig up my videos.

  • @mskidi
    @mskidi 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    there is A BIG BIG difference.more differences actually.while you are right that no man can win without a good supporting cast,jordan won his first three with a.a team that all the good players were drafted and develloped around him and mostly because of him b.with less star teamates than say larry or magic and c.jordan NEVER LOST to equal or slightely superior competition in the playoffs.in 11 full nba seasons (wizards dont count) he won 6 and lost only to heavily superior opponents

  • @jumpnam
    @jumpnam 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    @jordanlover23 I just searched for the game on TH-cam and found an upload, the dude who posted it also put up the game report from the New York Times in the description.
    I'll tell you what though, he was channeling '92 in a lot of his moves in this series. So much speed and athleticism. He didn't seem as quick or aggressive in any part of the '96 playoffs, after he'd got back in game shape.

  • @jordanlover23
    @jordanlover23 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    Jordan actually had not one, but TWO consecutive 35+ point halves in this series (game 2 second half, and game 3 first half; one of them was 35 and one was 36 points). How frequently does a player even have ONE 35 point half? He did it in two consecutive games.

  • @szaret1
    @szaret1 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    At :26 he broke his ankles bad and dunked it left handed. Happens alot but only jordan can make it look that good.

  • @popeyeisgood
    @popeyeisgood 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    i think besides the double teams problem ( yes grant is one of the major reason why they beat the bulls) the 95 bulls has chemistry problem as well. jordan certainly lifts them up a lot but most of the players arent accustomed to play with jordan. i remember them being scared of taking their own shots in many occasions. in the mean time i remember magic overall playing more cohesive as a team too.

  • @airtime23
    @airtime23 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yipp. It's the total package. Everyone who has ever played any sport at any level knows what it means. And we're talking about the highest level in the NBA here. It took the Heat a looong time to get used to each other when LeBron arrived and they had a preseason.

  • @jumpnam
    @jumpnam 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @jordanlover23 I just checked the game report for Game 3, I was wrong, he had 31 at half. My bad.

  • @yhcho1770
    @yhcho1770 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    this is the game 95 bulls desperately needed to get by the magic and get to eastern conference finals.
    I'm pretty sure even an out of shape jordan would find the killer instinct to finish the magic off in game 6 in chicago

  • @parridmaul1996
    @parridmaul1996 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those were the prototypes he was wearing a early version

  • @momoneylessproblems9183
    @momoneylessproblems9183 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can't believe MJ decided to take two years off during his prime. He would've won 8 straight if he hadn't retired. Then even the Bronsexuals couldn't make a case for LeBum being the GOAT.

  • @airtime23
    @airtime23 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Once again a perfect example is LeBron in the finals. Nice numbers. But the picture gets different when you watch the game itself. An exception was game 7 where he was really producing and made them pay for all that space they gave him.

  • @gf4670
    @gf4670 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @babyfaceace23 He averaged 31 a game on 47% shooting - not bad, and only a bit below his career playoff averages. The problem was the turnovers. His scoring was fine and his defense was ok, but he just didn't have the feel yet. And like you said, the only one on the team who knew how to play with him - and win big games in general - was Pippen. The team needed time. It's sort of a myth that he played "terrible" in this series because all anyone remembers is the Nick Anderson steal.

  • @yaiqab
    @yaiqab 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @jordanlover23
    Are you sure about that? If I remember correctly, he had 38 points in Game 2. I don't remember him only having 3 in the first half. Also, I believe that in game 3 he had 33 in the first half, but I could be wrong.

  • @jordanlover23
    @jordanlover23 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @yaiqab I'm 99% sure. I have both games on tape. It was at least 30+ in each half at the worst, but the first half in game 3 I'm certain he scored 35 or 36 points, because he made a basket at the buzzer that seemed like maybe it was tipped in by Kukoc, but they credited it to MJ.

  • @ryszardkilinski1238
    @ryszardkilinski1238 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Yep, but Bulls lost the game 5 and the entire series...

  • @yhcho1770
    @yhcho1770 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes, he had spectacular games at times during the 95 season comeback , so he was that gifted to come out after 18 month absence and just put up sick numbers. But C'mon, his numbers clearly show. His 95 numbers were career lows in terms of shooing %, scoring avg, etc. Even a 35 year old MJ in 98 season had better numbers than a much younger and faster 32 year old Jordan in 95 season. So you can't say he was in the shape he wanted to be in to compete at that level.

  • @ethanjobson3879
    @ethanjobson3879 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    So sad that MJ stans diminish his accomplishment here to try and spread negativity about Lebron.

  • @popeyeisgood
    @popeyeisgood 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    yea. but obviously there was chemistry problem over all. the ball movement of this season since jordan came back was very awkward.
    people think rusty = couldn't score at many point. i say rusty is the overall awareness as a player in the team, as part of the gear for the machine. that team, not only jordan, has problem being a team, unlike the 1st 3 peat team and then 2nd 3peat team. it is very very obvious for those who watched them enough.

  • @jordanlover23
    @jordanlover23 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @jumpnam That is absolutely false. In game 3 at Chicago he had a 35 point half at a minimum.

  • @jordanlover23
    @jordanlover23 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @jumpnam That is absolutely false. In game 3 at Chicago he had a 35 point first half at a minimum, and the second half of game 2 was 30 points at least. I can even tell you the type of shots he hit for many of his buckets in the first half of game 3. I have both these games on tape (I believe it was the TBS or TNT broadcast).

  • @Thutmosis7
    @Thutmosis7 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The magic lost in 96 not because the bulls didn't double team shaq. They lost because the magic team playas gave up before the series started like shaq and the rest. Not to mention shaq was awful from the freethrow in the entire series. I watched and saw that game. I was and still an orlando magic fans. It's been long call for the magic to fired brian hill and they didn't. He was an horrible coach.

  • @cadegarrison4931
    @cadegarrison4931 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    why do they have that great/clear picture of Jordan at the beginning, then the actual game film is sh*t lmao

  • @CashCollecta
    @CashCollecta 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I luv how mj fans conveniently forgot that this series ever happened lol 😂

    • @Alex-ox7fm
      @Alex-ox7fm 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ? He came back after two years off and was still 90% as good as the 93 season...plus it kinda helps that they swept the magic the next year lol

  • @RyanKaup
    @RyanKaup 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone that EVER compares LeBron to Jordan again..watch what Jordan does when he goes to the rack (doesn't bitch about a no-call) and finishes every. single. time.

  • @26bisket
    @26bisket 8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Jordan was never dominant in 1995.....even the 55 pt game, it wasn't as impressive as his other 50 pt games in his career, he wasn't clutch in the playoffs and still had a baseball body.......with that said it shows how good he was when he can still put up stats and whatnot without being at his best

    • @glennmcgollie5221
      @glennmcgollie5221 8 ปีที่แล้ว

      if jordan had Decided to come back with let's say 50 games left in the season there's no way bulls loose to magic they would have went to the finals jordan had a lot of rust he had to play off and 17 reg season games and a round of playoffs is no where near enough

    • @ChrisM07
      @ChrisM07 7 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They lose to the Magic no matter what lol, they had no one to clean up their misses on the boards and they double teamed Shaq too much.

  • @airtime23
    @airtime23 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    All I can say is this:
    /watch?v=ntwR8ZGmLJg
    Watch how he even runs back on D. That's not MJ'ish.

  • @mmcneil777
    @mmcneil777 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Even though he still seemed rusty, he seemed more explosive then in 96-98. He was more bulky after this but not as explosive and spectacular.

    • @Andrew7244
      @Andrew7244 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I just said exactly what you said

    • @mmcneil777
      @mmcneil777 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      1995 GetJiggyWitIt That is true. I believe he would have retained his explosiveness longer - even going into 1998. Pippen was a little younger, but there wasn’t as much of a drop off from 93’ Pippen to 98’ Pippen. Whereas Jordan had to basically change his style of play.

  • @FuShengAlex
    @FuShengAlex 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Yeah look how `rusty`Jordan looked here......his `timing` was off which is why he lost......Cry me a river with the excuses from the Jordan Jockers. The following game they were up 102-94 with under 3 minutes and got outscored 14-0 to close the series. If Rodman didn`t arrive the following year and Grant had`ve been heathly n`didn`t get injured the result would`ve been exactly the same.

  • @popeyeisgood
    @popeyeisgood 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    totally waste of time to even try to argue against. yea how easy it is to be passively aggressive by saying ' that's what a typicial jordan fan boy would say'.
    they simply never seen enough jordan to know what they are talking about. same goes with the myth that ' jordan developed his fadeaway during 2nd 3peat' , ' jordan was a poor outside shooter early in his career' and 'jordan used to be a ball hog until they have scottie'.
    they just dont know any better

  • @viilord2679
    @viilord2679 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Same year Jordan choked to a young Penny and Shaq

  • @SeecretWeapon
    @SeecretWeapon 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    so this guy can be playing baseball for 18 months come back and in 2 months kill it in the playoffs vs a team that went to the Finals
    imagine if he didn't spend all his time playing golf, gambling, smoking cigars trying to play baseball and just focused on this one thing like Kobe or Lebron do?

  • @airtime23
    @airtime23 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sorry people but I'm sick of this black and white thinking. So many people saying MJ wasn't rusty "just" because he dropped nice numbers. The Magic were a great but please. Don't tell me MJ was his old self by that time of his comeback. It's not only about the numbers.

    • @ethanjobson3879
      @ethanjobson3879 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you can watch this tape and say he was “rusty” Idk what to tell you.

    • @chilling8987
      @chilling8987 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ethanjobson3879 Watch full games. Jordan was a roller coster in those 1995 playoffs. He would miss a bunch of shots 1 game shooting 30% from the field, Next game he would be going on a tear. He didnt have the lift in the legs late in games because he didnt have stamina. he was still explosive and athletic, but he lacked stamina.

    • @ethanjobson3879
      @ethanjobson3879 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chilling8987 I have watched full games. He was great when it mattered most, just like always. He never shot 30% from the field or anywhere near it. He had 2 total games where he shot under 42% (both over 36%) and in one of them he made up for it by recognizing he was cold and getting to the line. The rest of his games were just indisputably good all around games. And that's before you get into the impact he was having other than scoring, especially on the defensive end. I will always find it funny MJ stans try to play down his performance in the 95 playoffs when it was one of his most impressive runs.

    • @chilling8987
      @chilling8987 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ethanjobson3879 Yea ok u clearly didnt watch those games against orlando. What a joke.
      Jordan didnt have lift in his legs as evident by him shooting 2 airballs in game 6 vs orlando in 1995.
      Game 3 wasnt that good. he had a explosive first hald with 31 points and for the remining of the game he was able to score only 9 more points which clearly proves the stamina problems he had.
      Game 1 he was trash and cost the Bulls dont the game. game 6 he was trash. game 3 secend half he was trash.
      Dont act like the 1995 orlando were a defensive team on the level of the 1992 and 1993 knicks which were the only teams to slow Jordan down in the playoffs up to that point.
      Jordan had his moments in the 1995 playoffs, to claim he wasnt rusty is ridiculous if u watched those full games and not just looking at highlights. I remember their were times his legs were shaking bro comon now. its more than stats.
      "95 playoffs when it was one of his most impressive runs"
      Pffft give me a break, the run where he choked the most was 1 of his most impressive runs? Lmao.
      If we go solo on stats, Jordan 1986, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993 amd 1997 were all better than 1995.
      If we adjust the sample size of games he played in the 1995 playoffs to the 1996 and 1998 playoffs both of those runs are just as great statisticly if not greater.
      Jeez dude u keep insisting the guy wasnt rusty because of what?

    • @ethanjobson3879
      @ethanjobson3879 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chilling8987 Lol, this is comical stuff:
      "as evident by him shooting two airballs"
      Ohmigod, two misses!!!!!!! Well I guess that settles it. Everyone knows the REAL Jordan never missed a shot!
      "Game 3 he wasn't that good. He had an explosive first half with 31 points"
      Oh yes, a 31 point half, the marker of an unimpressive game.
      "There were times his legs were shaking"
      Again, I admit my defeat. You settled it. Why bother with "stats" that signify "scoring" and "impact plays" that lead to "wins" (which Jordan took the Bulls to as many as losses in those playoffs) when you can dismiss them and instead focus on the fact that his legs were shaking. Obviously, the level of someone's game is determined by whether their legs were shaking a couple times or not and not these weird "stat" or "win" things.
      You should honestly try stand up man. Your stuff is great.

  • @popeyeisgood
    @popeyeisgood 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    stats is misleading in situation like this, which happens often enough to be considered a biased way to look at the overall performance of a player.
    illogical parrots who blindly follow these sound bites should be treated as spam.
    they just dont have enough brain to be analytical.