History of the South Slavs {630-2019}
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 18 ต.ค. 2024
- Song 1- by Slavic Affars( Attention this song can only be used with a special permition from its creator)
• Slavic Pagan War Drums...
Song 2 • Hriste Boze/Христе Бож...
Song 3 • YAKU - Kapitan Petko V...
![[UNCUT] "บอสณวัฒน์" แฉ! แหล่งซุกเงินแก๊งบอส ขยันผิดที่ไม่กี่ปีก็เข้าคุก l คนดังนั่งเคลียร์ l17ต.ค.67](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/BL56qIfXYZM/mqdefault.jpg)
![The Wall Song ร้องข้ามกำแพง | EP.215 | พาเวล นเรศ - พูห์ กฤติน | 17 ต.ค. 67 [1/5]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/IUzrjuf60P4/mqdefault.jpg)
If you are intrested In Bulgarian history check out this video
th-cam.com/video/niDdDG-vqgo/w-d-xo.html
3 rd music is captain Petko voivoda 1844-1900
Благодаря за линк, аз се чудя българската история от Турция 🇹🇷❤🇧🇬
Respect to my South Slavic brothers from Montenegro 🇲🇪🇷🇸🇧🇬🇭🇷🇸🇮
Zivela Srbska Crna Gora
You forgot Bosnia
Bosnians aren’t Slavic enough I guess lol
@@Faintpumpkin916 no, Bosnians are Slavic but Muslim and cause it, he don't see them like his brothers this dog
Long live to muslim Bosnia 🇧🇦🇧🇦🇧🇦☪️☪️☪️
Great job !
Very good. I think you messed up the borders of Bulgaria after ww1. Correct me if I'm wrong but you changed them after ww2
Yes I just noticed that the southern border with Greece is kind of messed up
@@historyrhymes1701 The Ebros river lol.
Actually you forgot to show the Bulgarian campaigns against the Gay-lesbian commonwealth 696969BC -6969 AD. Also the Bulgarian colonies of Atlantis , Jupiter,Sealand, Paris, the kongo basin and our outposts in Albania, Andromeda and Titan
You forgot that we got Saturn, Uranus and Antarctica too!
@@pavchoxx You forgot that Bulgaria got the sun by unexpected technology.
ahahahaah
How could you forget!?! We were the ones that actually built planets around other stars! EXO means outpost in the 69th Bulgarian Language
@Vladimir Ilitch Lenine yes however this video does not cover unsuccessful uprisings. Even the little children know that the gayrish
uprising was completely destroyed by the holy Albano-Bulgaro-kosovan anti-homosexual league.
Love the music
Bulgaria Croatia and Serbia mist take all of the other souty slav states and then make a new Yugoslavia ruled by the 3 of them and then conquer turkey for 800 years great video btw love from майка България
lol
Well ill drink to that.
Nah. Bulgarians aren't even real slavs.
Better should be Bosnians,Croats and Serbs
@@malion8374 real Slavs ? wow, who are real Slavs ? black haired Serbs, Bosnians and Dalmatians ....c'mon
@@malion8374 qph.fs.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-6eb420d2df1181a2f71e9cf9a10e60e7
Great work
Finally a new video! Awesome work!
My eyes were focused on Bulgaria 95% of this video
cus we're the best slavs duh
Nah albanians are the best slavs since everytime
@@dragospopovici7337 oh, forgot about them. Sorry for spreading false information
@@dragospopovici7337 romanians are slavs too who changed their language in 19 century you can see on a grave of vlad tepes written in slavic language similar to serbia and bulgarian.
@@dragospopovici7337 *_Albanians are not slavs u idiot_* 😂😂😂
Croatia remained autonomous kingdom under Habsburgs (1527-1918.) and in personal union with Hungary. Also,Republic of Ragusa was from 11th. century to 1808.
@@djordjelipovac3558 Kao pašaluk.. Ča će i biti za par godinA!
We are not Slavs. !!!
We are Macedonians like Aristotle philosopher And Alexander the great.
The Slavs conquered our homeland.
They destroyed our history, our language.
Even the names of our cities were made Slavic.!!
We are not Slavs. !!!
We can provocate each others, but we are only south slavic countries with history❤
S L A V A ✝️ С Л А В А
🇭🇷❤🇷🇸❤🇧🇬
It was all fun and games until Dusan came to power :D
Nice video!
Stenky games ?
@@ивопетков-с2ж па игре, као, шале
Awesome! You're the best!
Respected Bulgaria from greece
Serbian is an Indo European language of the Balto Slavic branch. English is an Indo European language of the West Germanic branch. English milk, Tocharian malke, Latin mulgeo, Old Irish melg, Greek amelgo, Russian moloko and so forth.
Linguistic, textual, genetic and archaeological evidence for the Out of India Theory of Indo European Languages
Baghpat Chariots, Weapons and the Horse in the Harappan Civilization - Dr. BK Manjul
th-cam.com/video/fZvKpjjTpgg/w-d-xo.html
Findings from the latest genetic study conducted by ASI in collaboration with the Reich Lab at Harvard using ancient DNA from Rakhigarhi
slides at 29:00 mark
th-cam.com/video/Dio3Ep0nlv4/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/n4WFk0iEK5k/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/f0Lg1b_8N54/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/-wIu3dUsmtY/w-d-xo.html
Here are the tribes that spread the Indo European languages from South Asia to West Asia, Central Asia and to Europe
Avestan) Afghanistan: Proto-Iranian: Sairima (Śimyu), Dahi (Dāsa).
NE Afghanistan: Proto-Iranian: Nuristani/Piśācin (Viṣāṇin).
Pakhtoonistan (NW Pakistan), South Afghanistan: Iranian: Pakhtoon/Pashtu (Paktha).
Baluchistan (SW Pakistan), SE Iran: Iranian: Bolan/Baluchi (Bhalāna).
NE Iran: Iranian: Parthian/Parthava (Pṛthu/Pārthava).
SW Iran: Iranian: Parsua/Persian (Parśu/Parśava).
NW Iran: Iranian: Madai/Mede (Madra).
Uzbekistan: Iranian: Khiva/Khwarezmian (Śiva).
W. Turkmenistan: Iranian: Dahae (Dāsa).
Ukraine, S, Russia: Iranian: Alan (Alina), Sarmatian (Śimyu).
Turkey: Thraco-Phrygian/Armenian: Phryge/Phrygian (Bhṛgu).
Romania, Bulgaria: Thraco-Phrygian/Armenian: Dacian (Dāsa).
Greece: Greek: Hellene (Alina).
Albania: Albanian: Sirmio (Śimyu).
Shrikant Gangadhar Talageri
talageri.blogspot.com/2020/07/the-full-out-of-india-case-in-short.html
Five waves of Indo-European expansion: a preliminary model (2018)
Igor A Tonoyan-Belyayev
I. Tonoyan-Belyayev
www.academia.edu/36998766/Five_waves_of_Indo-European_expansion_a_preliminary_model_2018_
Bulgaria ❤❤❤
Serbo-Bulgarian Empire by 2050
BOSNIAN WORLD ODER BY 2097
@@djordjelipovac3558 WHAT THE FUCK IS THAT SUPOSED TO MEAN
@@djordjelipovac3558your calling a Bosniak guy a terrorist after the yugo war... 😒
@@djordjelipovac3558 let bosnia rest, for it is the homeland of our grand grandfathers
@@lad4415 Rusia will not allow this
Amazing !
Damm Bulgaria was big!
And nobody knows
@@theworldofmandom7227 I know (also wehn my country had a bad relationship with bulgaria)
@@hamzaabusalim3976 you betrayed us after we united. You was thinking only for land.
@@theworldofmandom7227 I'm not a slav
@@hamzaabusalim3976 I am sorry then
Perfect video!
Bulgaria has held dobrugea for 530 years
@Stan Cezar wdym?
Svaka cast za muziku i pesmu u pozadini bratko.. Pozzz iz Srbija za brat blgar.. 💪
The music fits great to this
Its "North Macedonia" know not FYROM.
Ps: i know that they are Bulgarians
@Ilija Stojanoski What about Kuber's bulgaria?
@Ilija Stojanoski what's a... poacher ?
@@andreipop5805, cuceritorul. Este in limba macedoneana, nu in limba bulgara.
@@iulianarion8694 macedoneana e un dialect al bulgarei.
You're brainwashed. Macedonians were and will never be Bulgarians. Are the Serbs and Croats the same people? Of course not. The same goes for the Macedonians and Bulgarians.
(By the way if any Greek is reading this I meant for the slavo-macedonians lmao)
If Yugoslavia still existed... This would be the perfect video for its history!
TSAR SAMUIL conquered half of Croatian coastline until Zadar
And got pushed back.
You did such an amazing work here. I want to add something here which I think is, in some extension, very important. Duklja was a kingdom from 1077-1143, Kingdom of Prilep(1371-1395) and Syrmia also. And you could fill the segment from 16. to 19. century. There were State of Jovan Nenad (1526-1527), Duchy of Syrmia of Radoslav Čelnik (1527-1532), Prince-Bishropric of Montenegro (which was actually de facto independent since creation in 1516 but only de jure part of the Ottoman empire), Revolutionary Serbia (1804-1813) and i would add Republic of Ragusa here (1358-1808). In 19th century Montenegro and Serbia became only internationally recognised in 1878. Montenegro was never a vassal and Serbia was only from 1817 to 1867. Keep up with the good work mate! ☺️
We are not Slavs. !!!
We are Macedonians like Aristotle philosopher And Alexander the great.
The Slavs conquered our homeland.
They destroyed our history, our language.
Even the names of our cities were made Slavic.!!
We are not Slavs. !!!
Невероятно видео ! Благодаря ! ☦️🇧🇬
We are not Slavs. !!!
We are Macedonians like Aristotle philosopher And Alexander the great.
The Slavs conquered our homeland.
They destroyed our history, our language.
Even the names of our cities were made Slavic.!!
We are not Slavs. !!!
Whery interseting good jobe
4:10 NOOOOO 😖😖😖😢😢😢
Djordje, pa jel me se secas?
@@kanal2123a da hehe
Pusto e niama slaviani lol
Good stuff.
Respect from Србиja!🇷🇸🇧🇬BROTHERS!
:) respect brother
@@aleksk4151 thanks тебра
I liked the music at the beginning, it was so good
Bulgaria:
Holds belgrade ~ 270 yrs
Holds dobruja ~ 490 yrs
Holds north Macedonia ~ 220 yrs
Holds costal thrace ~ 100 yrs
Turkey:
Holds bulgaria ~ 500 years
See? No logic there bud, move on, those are your lost territories, most of which you lost by being agressor like Dobruja and Thrace.
@@ozegovich3649 Still bulgarian lol
Congrats on 7K subscibers!
Slava Of Slavs🇧🇬🇷🇺
South Slavs 💪
Got ruled by Turks
1:28 OH YEAH
Top quality mapping
You forgot to show the creation of the bishop-principality of montenegro from 1697.
I actually had it on a frame but forget to add it at the edditing
Great
1. I’m pretty sure FYROM was renamed to North Macedonia in 2018-2019.
2. Kosovo is completely independent and operational from Serbia. They gained their independence just like Montenegro, with the help of the UN. Serbia may claim that Kosovo is still theirs, but Serbia has no control over Kosovo at all. The only countries who don’t support Kosovo are Serbia’s friends, and countries with their own separationist movements (ex. Spain with Catalonia.) They don’t want their separatists to think since Kosovo was recognized, that they could be too. No, I am not Albanian, or Kosovar, I am just explaining logically common sense.
Bulgar Turks (with also slavs and thracians ok) vs Romans
Fatlinda Islami
You are not a Turk so why do you pretend to be a Turk?
You are a 12 year old Albanian girl who lives with her parents in Gostivar
th-cam.com/video/2doYxUe3ilg/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=Dookumoftherookbrook
@@petertodorov1792 какво е това видео
@@bulgariannationalist1637
Tova video pokazva tos arnaut koito mrazi bulgari
Toi e 12 godishen gaddina i napada bulgari pot zsichki videa
Great video but i didn't like that you didn't include Montenegro before 1815 and after 1500 under the rule of archbishops and dynasty Petrović
❤ you showed of a very underated and very long history Wich may come supprising to mamy.The Balkan peninsula used to be the center of the world
Do alternate history of Antarctica next.
you should update this video into an 2020 version where North ''Macedonia" joins Bulgaria...
I really like your work. How do you do your maps, and how do you animate them?
I made the maps on pain.net and animate with windows live movie maker and movavi
@@historyrhymes1701 Thanks ! I imagine that's a lot of work, combined with historical researches
The Bulgarian Ollie Bye
There are some big mistakes with Bosnia and Croatia(like croatia not owning slavonia at multiple times, or not having „turska hrvatska“ )but not bad👍
My bad, I ve drrown the borders accuratly but I have accidently made Croatia smaller than it really was as during the rule of Tomislav, the croats defeated multiple Hungarian and Bulgarian invasions, spreading the influence of the Croatian kings even northward to Slavonia. Well I will look more carefully next time.
Bulgarian empire mapping No problem! If you want, I can give you multiple german and yugoslavian sources and maps from books(they show complete timelines)since my mother studied history.If you want those just contact me!
@@Stjepan_Gr ajde pošalji meni brate
@@historyrhymes1701 Is this the trailer text to "history of Croatia" ?
Keep in mind that out of all Balkaners the Croats didnt lose their independence completely until the 19th century.
There is one republic - Dubrovnik which existed unitl the 19th century.
There is no need to comply to Serbian commentary warriors that Croatia existed only from 9th to 12th century Croatia and Hungary were in personal union at it is not like the Hungarian king ruled over Croatia. The dynasty at some point was Anjou and Croatia had fixed borders.
Templar E-Z То царе👍! Поздрави от братски Хърватия! Заедно срещу лъжи и приказка! 🇧🇬🤝🇭🇷
I dont know why people think that bulgarian borders are bad THEY ARE CORRECT i am from serbia and learned this from history they occupied serbia and much of balkan 1014 in battle of bjelasica bulgarian lose and then they folled
Thanks for serbian music what do you say is kosovo serbia ?
I personally support Kosovo to remain Serbian
Don't explain tthis to Macedonians okay...
@@todorkrasimirov8304 I don't know what to say about Macedonia is it Bulgarian or Greek
@@speedupbalkan372 it's not Bulgaria it's Greece Alexander the great named them all MACEDONS and Greeks are MACEDONS and byzantines this is one nation.. The population of those was Greeks with Greeks religion.. The population of now Macedonia is? Look at the history since the 8th century and see and tell me... Since the 8th century Bulgarians was in this region of now Macedonia
Serbian also had empire :)
Firstly, There are no Eastern Roman historians attributing the ease of Slavic settlement to Justinian's plague - which was spread all over Europe (despite its popular name and the worst scenario occurring in densely populated Constantinople) and almost certainly affected Slavs. Further on, based on all archaeological findings of both the Antes and the Sclavenes, we know for a fact that equipment was standardized in the sense that every excavated grave of a Slavic warrior features chainmail and sword (fashioned in East Roman style), an axe, round wooden shield, and a long spear. Some Slavic warriors were wearing belts with buckles adorned with Avar motifs, but they were most likely spoils of war or items of trade. The only group of Slavs that fought without armor was warbands of young warriors who've fought entirely naked (barring the red paint on their body, hair, and face) and in melee (the ones that were described as being red-haired by Procopius), and some groups of Pannonian Wends who were tributaries of the Pannonian Avars, and relying on ambushes was a part of defensive strategies, and only against hosts that were too numerous and too well armed, like the joint Avar-Roman host that assailed Sclavene territories after Daurentius slew Bayan's envoys and refused to pay tribute to him. Aside from that, both the Antes and the Sclavenes have utilized large breeds of horses for warfare, and matter of fact, an entire host of Antean and Sclavene horsemen was dispatched to evacuate Belisarius from Italy, which proves the aforementioned.
Secondly, the Avars have only managed to subjugate the more passive parts of the Dudlebes, as well as parts of the Wends - certainly not the Antes and the Sclavenes, who were noted to have lived only under the reign of their own kings like Muzok and Mezamir (Antes) and chieftains like Radagast and Daurentius, of whom the latter was described as being the supreme chief of all Sclavenes. Procopius' early assessment of Slavic social structure was just that - an early assessment based off of early sightings of Slavic warbands that were initially considered to have been "small tribes governed by "military democracy". As interaction with Slavs intensified, he realized that the Slavs did exhibit an organized social structure, albeit admittedly, the Antes were the most centralized body of the Early Slavs, with a hereditary monarchy where one king reigned over all of the Antes, while among the Sclavenes, you've had one known supreme chieftain like the aforementioned Daurentius to whom other chieftains were subordinate, there was also a mention of Sclavene kings, like Perbundos, who led a coalition of Sclavene tribes deep into Greece. Likewise, the Avars were first invited to make a move against the Slavs by the Roman emperor Tiberius, and later on, Emperor Heraclius would invite Serbs and Croats from the distant Slavic northwest to liberate the northern provinces of the Avars and have them settle all those provinces as his vassals which he'd ennoble, which refutes any theory of the Sclavenes and Antes arriving to Southeastern Europe off of the back of the Avars. After all, the earliest Slavic raids deep into the Roman territory were accompanied by the enslavement of an estimated quarter of a million Romans in every province struck by the Slavs, and the sacking and besieging of Roman cities, which were recorded as early as the first part of the 6th century - decades before the Avars were contacted by Emperor Tiberius, and before they reached the most distant part of the basin of the Danube. On top of that, the invading Sclavenes have also slain Asbadus/Asbados - the famed Roman/Gepid general, and have also annihilated his elite army, a feat which would've been impossible if the Slavs "only fought from afar", or worse, if they've "made no use of pitched organized warfare". The usage of poison arrows and guerrilla warfare was deployed only in defensive wars against a martially superior enemy - like against the combined Roman-Avar army during Maurice's campaign which was launched deep into Sclavene territories north of the Danube.
In the work of Menander Protector, we find the following excerpt: "This movement of Avars against the Slavs did not only result from Emperor's envoys and the wish of Bayan to return the courtesy unto Romans for all the gestures of friendship and help that he had received from the Emperor but also because he held great hate for them (the Slavs) out of personal sentiment as well. The Avar leader has, therefore, sent envoys to Daurentius (Δαυρίτας) himself, and to his chieftains, calling on for their submission and enlistment among tribute-payers. Dauritas and the leaders alongside him replied: "Who is, then, the man which basks in sunlight that threatens to conquer our strength? We are used to ruling over others, not to being ruled over - of that, we are certain for as long as wars are waged and swords are forged". Since the Slavs acted so haughtily, the Avars were no different in boasting. Then the scolds and insults resulted from that, being that the barbarians are of a narrow and proud mind, and the fight broke out. The Slavs, unable to control their anger, killed the envoys, as Bayan found out from another source. Because of that Bayan has long since raised accusations against the Slavs, fueling a secret hatred against them, mad for they refused him, and angry that from them he received an unforgivable insult, in the same time he thought he would do a favor to Caesar and likewise *find a rich land to plunder, for far too long has the land of Romans been plundered by Slavs, and theirs (Slavic) - never by any of other peoples*."
Thirdly, the Early Slavs seized and inhabited a massive territory that spanned from the east of Germany to the Baltic and the very distant fringes of Eastern Europe. Matter of fact, the bulk of the Sclavenes have lived on the northern shores of the Danube and were bribed by Roman authorities into maintaining that status quo, at least temporarily. Also, Slavs weren't "monotheistic", they were henotheistic. Even though Perun was their chief god, they also recognized the existence of other gods as well, hence why the Sclavenes and the Antes worshipped Perun and Veles - which also reflected their lifestyles, which were very warlike and militarized and subsided on animal husbandry, fishing, hunting, gathering and the practice of a form of agriculture that required the burning of the soil, so they weren't nomadic, but certainly not entirely sedentary either. It's also important to note that Procopius also states that the Sclavenes and the Antes shared the same customs, beliefs, and institutions. The same goes for the Wends, which is also supported by the homogeneity of early Slavic aDNA, YDNA, and language, although material culture was far more varied (depending on which culture they defeated and assimilated).
Fourthly, the role of the Avars in all of this is overemphasized, and for the following reasons:
a) As mentioned before, they were invited by the Romans to defeat and subdue unruly peoples on the Danube, like the Antes (who were Roman allies from time to time as well), and during the next century or so will be the foremost "allies" of the Romans against the Slavs, up until Heraclius invites the Serbs and Croats (Sclavene tribes) to defeat and annihilate them south of the Danube.
b) While it's true that the Avar hosts were initially the largest, they were in time overshadowed by the Sclavene hosts, which have, after realizing that the Roman authority on the Danube is no more, begun launching massive invasions that were also preludes to the permanent settling of the lands they've seized, and initiating the assimilation of the peoples they've defeated and temporarily subjugated.
c) Western historians tend to make the mistake of not distinguishing the Slavs, even though primary sources from that era have noted that the Early Slavs were divided into three groups: the Wends, the Sclavenes, and the Antes, which brings us to the point of the "100 000 Slavs" that were part of the Avar host - most of them were Pannonian Wend tributaries of the Avars, while the rest were Sclavene allies who, thanks to their arrangement with the Avars, were exempt from abiding by Avar-Roman peace treaties, and would continue raiding and marauding as they pleased, which brought great displeasure to Bayan senior and junior, and the Roman emperors as well.
d) Slavs would've invaded and permanently settled the lands south of the Danube one way or the other, the involvement of the Avars has only somewhat hastened of process, and by subsequently making sure that the Sclavene tribes would form the overwhelming bulk of those who'd settle and seize the territories in question by waging exhaustive wars with the Antes. At most, the Avars were a strictly Pannonian phenomenon and were never masters of the "Balkans", which is also supported by archaeology and modern genetic studies, and given that you're made a mention of primary Roman/Greek sources, you should also know that there's not a single one of them that claims that the Slavs were migrating with the Avars, but that they were invading Southeastern Europe at the same time. You could potentially make that point for the aforementioned Pannonian Wends, but not for the bulk of the invading Slavs - who were Sclavenes and Antes.
Those who attribute the success of the Slavic invasion and colonization of Roman territories to the Avars omit the following:
a) Serbs didn't invade in the 6th, but in the mid-7th century, and in toe with the Croats, and were tasked with exterminating all Avars south of the Danube and ruling all the provinces they’d liberate at the request of emperor Heraclius.
b) The Slavs who've invaded, conquered, and colonized Southeastern Europe were the Sclavenes and Antes, not the “Avaroslavs”, who were noted to have been Pannonian Wends, and were, aside from the Greeks/Romans themselves, also distinguished from other Slavs on that very basis by Fredegar, and were mentioned only twice in all primary Greek sources, during the Siege of Constantinople in 626, and during one of the many Slavic sieges of Thessaloniki, where Saint Demetrius states they arrived to assist the already present Sclavenes who've besieged the city, lured by promises of the city’s wealth.
c) By the time the Avars arrived at the Danubian basin at the invitation of emperor Tiberius, who had invited them for the sole purpose of waging war against the Sclavenes, Antes, and Kutrigurs, the Slavs were already invading and raiding Southeastern Europe for roughly forty years, and as deep as Southern Peloponnesus, Crete and the outer walls of Constantinople.
d) All primary sources, like Jordanes, Procopius, Saint Demetrius, John of Ephesus, Theophylact of Simocatta, and Menander Protector state that the Sclavenes and the Antes were under the rule of their rulers like Mezamir, Muzhok, Dervan/Daurentius, and Radogost, and weren't subdued by the Avars, and distinguish them from the aforementioned Avaroslavs (Pannonian Wends).
e) Attributing the success of the Slavic invasion and colonization of Southeastern Europe to the Avars is, aside from being contradictory to all primary Roman/Greek sources, since the very purpose of the invitation of the Avars was to wage war against the Slavs and the Kutrigurs, which is exemplified in the joint Avar-Roman invasion of Daurentius' realm, also a textbook example of 19th and 20th-centuries German, Italian, Greek, Hungarian and Austrian anti-Slavism designed to undermine the legitimacy of Slavic history, the geopolitical realities of Slavic territories, and to portray Slavs as a subsidiary mass of naturally subordinate peoples.
Sources: Jordanes, Procopius, Saint Demetrius, John of Ephesus, Theophylact of Simocatta, and Menander Protector, De Administrando Imperio, Sima Cirkovic, Francis Dvornik, Dimitry Obolensky, and Frederick Hamilton Jackson.
Didn't read
Balkan slavs were live under control by Turks 500 years... But we dont hate them because this is a life , last years we were in balkans 500-550 years , greeks were 2000 years, maybe next centry slavs will take undercontrol to balkans.. Whatevery.. We should be friendly , have a nice day all balkans people.!
Finally a smart turk
@@themengene1132 serbia fall in 1496 it was controled by turks for 300-350 years even if we lost our country we still continued to fight you have win the most batlles with janesseris most janesseris were serbian there are a lot oficers who had serbian origin in turkish army the mother of mehmed the conqueror was serbian and setfan lazarevic helped you. No hate
milan kos lots of turks has slavic genes aldready. speaking for myself i have bulgarian genes
milan kos main serbia fall in 1460s, and u stopped fighting, u made some minor revolts in this 350 years and all were crushed, u didnt win any battle.
milan kos most effective serbian revolt before 1806 revolt happened in 1596, in timisiora, romania. and it wasnt because they want independence, that one also easily crushed.
Super! Kak se kazva purvata pesen?
Respect the vid but Doclea ( Duklja ) was not a Serbian principality
For 2 Reasons: It wasn't Serbian and it was a kingdom not a principality ( Decleared as such by pope Gregory VII in 1077.AD and Mihailo Vojislavljevic the king of Slavs)
...they use ''official'' history (from the school),...a WORD SERBIA OR SERB didn't exist until 13 century,...when King Nemanja formed for the first time a Serb Kingdom,...also, a WORD CROAT didn't exits before 11 century,...because a word Croat refers Crusader,...
Where do you get all the info to make these timeline maps? I mean, we’re people really mapping out the Balkans in the 7th and 8th centuries? I’m just really curious and fascinated and would love to find this info.
The best sources about the early slavic tribes "sclaveni" are the ones of the byzantine historiographer
Procopious(his sources are the most detailed ones which we have about the early south slavs . Other authors which also mention the sclaveni in their works :Menander protector,Strategikon and Jordanes.
Bulgarian empire mapping yea, but did he make the maps?
@@devastaterzx6906
probably not. We are all in denial, trying to hold on to ideas that can be swept away by DNA....then we will be left with our attitudes on how we FEEL about each other.
Not sure from where you're getting your information, but the only Slavs that were subjugated by the Avars were the Pannonian Wends (the rest of the Wends were either independent or vassals of the Franks), while the Sclavenes and Antes who've formed the bulk of the Early Slavs, and the Slavs who've invaded and colonized Roman territories in Europe were independent, sovereign entities, and either at war with the Avars or allied with them, depending on the tribe (unlike the subdued Pannonian Wends). Based on the overwhelming majority of archaeological findings, on nearly all primary sources (like Strategikon of Maurice, Menander Protector, and Procopius, first and foremost) and the toponymy of Southeastern Europe, we know that the Slavs have played the leading role in the invasion of Southeastern Europe and that they were perceived as Rome's greatest threat on the Northern Limes, not the Avars, who in reality, were invited by Rome as their allies against the Slavs, as Menander Protector put its:
"(...) About the fourth year of the reign of Caesar Tiberius Constantine, some hundred thousand Slavs broke into Thrace and pillaged that and many other regions. As Greece was being laid waste by the Slavs, with trouble liable to flare up anywhere, and as Tiberius had at his disposal by no means sufficient forces, he sent a delegation to the Khagan of the Avars. (...)"
Crediting the Avars for the success of the Slavic invasion and colonization is first and foremost a modern, primarily German, Austrian, Hungarian, and even Greek narrative that has virtually no substantiation in history that originated in the writings of Pavel Jozef Safarik's dubious assessment of the early history of the South Slavs, and can only be attributed to ahistorical, political agendas that should be reviled and demonized in academic discourse, not adopted.
We also know that at the time, the Avars didn't dare to invade Slavic lands by themselves, yet again, based on Menander's report: "This movement of Avars against the Slavs did not only result from Emperor's envoys and the wish of Bayan to return the courtesy unto Romans for all the gestures of friendship and help that he had received from the emperor but also because he held great hate for them (the Slavs) out of personal sentiment as well. The Avar leader has, therefore, sent envoys to Daurentius (Δαυρίτας) himself, and to his chieftains, calling on for their submission and enlistment among tribute-payers. Daurentius and the leaders alongside him replied: "Who is, then, the man which basks in sunlight that threatens to conquer our strength? We are used to ruling over others, not to being ruled over - of that, we are certain for as long as wars are waged and swords are forged".
Since the Slavs acted so haughtily, the Avars were no different in boasting. Then the scolds and insults resulted from that, being that the barbarians are of a narrow and proud mind, and the fight broke out. The Slavs, unable to control their anger, killed the envoys, as Bayan found out from another source. Because of that Bayan has long since raised accusations against the Slavs, fueling a secret hatred against them, mad for they refused him, and angry that from them he received an unforgivable insult, in the same time he thought he would do a favor to Caesar and likewise *find a rich land to plunder, for far too long has the land of Romans been plundered by Slavs, and theirs (Slavic) - never by any of other peoples*."
We also know the following from the Strategikon of Maurice: "...being freedom-loving, they are in no way inclined to become slaves or to obey, especially in their own land." (Strategikon of Maurice, ed. prep. V. V. Kuchma. SPb., 2004, p. 189)”. Maurice and his successors fought primarily against Slavs, and he dedicated the majority of his Strategikon's chapters on barbarian enemies to the Slavs and the Antes, whom he and as we've mentioned before, Rome as well saw as its greatest threat to the Northern Limes.
Also, the Serbs and Croats didn't just settle Roman land but also waged war against the Avars at the behest of Heraclius, and "exterminated" every Avar South of the Danube, as Frederick Hamilton Jackson puts it: "The war with Persia in 600-614 strained the Roman resources and thus denuded the coast of soldiers, therefore the Avars and Slavs inroads ravaged as they pleased under Heraclius (610-640), who had called in the latter to drive out the Avars; Narona, Salona, Epidaurus, Burnum, and Rhizinium were destroyed. In 641 Pope John IV., a Dalmatian by birth, sent Abbot John to Istria and Dalmatia to ransom prisoners and collect relics. The Croats and Serbs exterminated the Avars in the middle of the seventh century and delivered the province, the Croats occupying the west to the river Cetina, the Serbs the east from the Cetina to Albania. De Administrando Imperio says the same:
"Therefore everyone, who would like to do research about Dalmatia, can read herein about the way how the Slavic peoples took it. The Croats with their families came to Dalmatia and found the Avars in possession of that land. After fighting against each other for some time, the Croats defeated the Avars, partially murdered them, and partially forced them to submissiveness. Since that moment the country was seized by the Croats.".
Sources: De Administrando Imperio and the Shores of the Adriatic by Frederick Hamilton Jackson.
Procopius, Book V, XXVII, 134:
"(...) This exploit, then, was accomplished by the Goths on the third day after they were repulsed by the assault on the wall. But twenty days after the city and harbor of Portus were captured, Martinus and Valerian arrived, bringing with them sixteen hundred horsemen, the most of whom were Huns and Sclaveni and Antae, who are settled above the Ister River not far from its banks. (...)"
Procopius about Slavic invaders capturing and enslaving a lot of Romans:
Procopius, Book VII, XIII - describing events in the year 545 AD:
"(...) For a great throng of the barbarians, the Sclaveni, had, as it happened, recently crossed the Ister, plundering the adjoining country and enslaving a very great number of Romans. (...)"
Procopius of Caesarea:
"(...) In Illyria and Thracia, from the Ionian Gulf to Byzantine surrounding cities, where Hellas and Chersonese regions are situated, (...) the Sclavenes and the Antes, penetrating practically every year since Justinian administering the Roman Empire, were inflicting irreversible damage to their inhabitants. In each invasion, I estimate 200,000 Romans were either taken as prisoners or killed (...)"
Procopius about Roman attempts to stop the Slavic invasion:
"(...) the Empire wasn't able to find just one only man just as brave to undertake this task."
Pope Gregory I in a letter to the Exarch of Italy from the year 599:
"(...) It deeply afflicts and disquiets me the Slavic nation that menace us. It afflicts me from what I already suffer from you, it disquiets me because they have already started to penetrate into the Italic peninsula through Istria. (...)"
And according to Priscus, 610 Slavic tribes flooded into Greece.
Procopius of Caesarea:
"(...) Nay further, they [the Slavs] do not differ at all from one another in appearance. For they are all exceptionally tall and stalwart men, while their bodies and hair are neither very fair nor blond nor indeed do they incline entirely to the dark type (...)".
Procopius of Caesarea:
"(...) In more or less the same time [549 - 550] a Slavic army (...) gathered itself together and after crossing without encountering any resistance from anyone the river Ister [Danube], and later with similar ease the river Heuros, it divided itself for two parts. (...) Commanders of Roman garrisons in Illyria and Thrace fought against both those parts and even though they had already separated from each other, the Romans suffered - contrary to their expectations - a defeat and some of them fell dead on the spot, while others found salvation in escaping. (...) After all, garrisons had suffered such defeats at the hands of either one or the other of the barbarian armies, one of the enemy bands fought against the troops of Asbadus. He was a member of Emperor Justinian's personal guard (...) and he led a numerous and elite force of cavalry, which had been garrisoned for a long time inside the Thracian stronghold of Tdzurulon. But also, they were forced to retreat by the Slavs and most of them, shamefully escaping, got slaughtered, while Asbadus himself was captured and temporarily left alive, but soon after that the Slavs skinned him alive and threw him into a burning campfire. After that, the Slavs were plundering all neighboring Thracian and Illyrian lands without any obstacles and both of their two units captured many strongholds. (...) And those who had defeated Asbadus later plundered, in turn, everything up to the sea coast and captured in an assault the coastal city of Toperus (...) And they slaughtered 25,000 men, plundered everything, and enslaved all the children and all the women. (...)"
John of Ephesus:
"(...) In the third year after the death of Emperor Justin, during the reign of victorious Tiberius, the damned nation of the Slavs has risen, and marched through entire Hellas, through lands of Thessaly and Thrace, captured many cities and strongholds, plundered, burned, and robbed, seized the land and settled there with full ease, without fear, like in their own land. (...) they were plundering the country, burning it, and robbing, as far as the Great Walls [of Constantinople], and this is how they captured many thousands of cattle, as well as many other kinds of booty. (...) Until today, that is until year 584, they still continue to live in peace in the lands of the Rhomaioi, without fear and concern, plundering, murdering and burning, getting rich and highjacking gold and silver, capturing horses and plenty of weapons; and they have learned to fight better than the Rhomaioi. (...)"
Menander Protector:
"(...) About the fourth year of the reign of Caesar Tiberius Constantine, some hundred thousand Slavs broke into Thrace and pillaged that and many other regions. As Greece was being laid waste by the Slavs, with trouble liable to flare up anywhere, and as Tiberius had at his disposal by no means sufficient forces, he sent a delegation to the Khagan of the Avars. (...)"
Strategikon of Maurice:
"(...) They do not keep prisoners in perpetual slavery like other peoples, but they demarcate for them a limited period of time, after which they give them a choice: they can return home after purchasing their freedom or stay among them as free people and friends. (...)"
Strategikon of Maurice:
"...being freedom-loving, they are in no way inclined to become slaves or to obey, especially in their own land." (Strategikon of Maurice, ed. prep. V. V. Kuchma. SPb., 2004, p. 189)”
Jordanes:
"(...) These people, as we started to say at the beginning of our account or catalog of nations, though off-shoots from one stock, have now three names, that is, Venedi, Antes, and Sclaveni. (...) they now rage in war far and wide, in punishment for our sins (...) Though their names are now dispersed amid various clans and places, they are chiefly called Sclaveni and Antes. (...)"
Procopius of Caesarea:
"(...) Belisarius was eager to capture alive one of the men of note among the enemy, in order that he might learn what the reason might be why the barbarians were holding out in their desperate situation. And Valerian promised readily to perform such a service for him. For there were some men in his command, he said, from the nation of the Sclaveni, who are accustomed to concealing themselves behind a small rock or any bush which may happen to be near and pounce upon an enemy. In fact, they are constantly practicing this in their native haunts along the river Ister, both on the Romans and on the barbarians as well. (...)"
Abraham ben Jacob (a 10th-century Sephardic Jewish traveler from Muslim Spain):
"(...) Slavic countries extend from the Mediterranean Sea to the Northern Ocean. (...) Generally speaking, Slavs are warlike and violent, and if not for their internal discord and lack of unity, no other nation would be able to match them in strength. (...)"
And about the arrival of the Croats and Serbs (but it was much later - not during the 500’s, but during the 600’s):
Constantine Porphyrogennetos, "De Administrando Imperio":
"(...) their ancestors were Pagan Croats and Serbs, known also as White [Croats and Serbs]. Great Croatia, called also White [Croatia], until today is still Pagan, just like neighboring [Lusatian / West Slavic] Serbs [Sorbs] (...)"
And another excerpt - "De Administrando Imperio":
"(...) Therefore everyone, who would like to do research about Dalmatia, can read herein about the way how the Slavic peoples took it. The Croats with their families came to Dalmatia and found the Avars in possession of that land. After fighting against each other for some time, the Croats defeated the Avars, partially murdered them, and partially forced them to submissiveness. Since that moment the country was seized by the Croats. (...)"
“Daurentius is the first Slavic chieftain to be recorded by name, by the Byzantine historian Menander Protector, who reported that the Avar khagan Bayan I sent an embassy, asking Daurentius and his Slavs to accept Avar suzerainty and pay tribute because the Avars knew that the Slavs had amassed great wealth after repeatedly plundering the Byzantine Balkan provinces. Daurentius reportedly retorted that "Others do not conquer our land, we conquer theirs [...] so it shall always be for us.”
Daurentius (to the Avar envoy): "Who is, then, the man who basks in sunlight that threatens to conquer our strength? We are used to ruling over others, not to being ruled over - of that, we are certain for as long as wars are waged and swords are forged".
A lot of scientists, linguists, archaeologists, historians etc. are considering that 8,500 years ago, Romania was the heart of the old European civilization. The new archaeological discoveries from Tartaria, (Romania), showed up written plates older than the Sumerian ones. More and more researches and studies converged to the conclusion that the Europeans are originated in a single place, the lower Danube basin. Down there, at Schela and Cladova in Romania have been discovered proves of the first European agricultural activities which appear to be even older than 10,000 years.
Out of 60 scientifically works which are covering this domain, 30 of them localize the primitive origins of the man-kind in Europe, where 24 of them are localizing this origin in the actual Romania, (Carpathian- Danubian area); 10 are indicating western Siberia, 5 Jutland and/or actual Germany room, 4 for Russia, 4 for some Asian territories, 1 for actual France area and all these recognisied despite against the huge pride of those nations.
Jean Carpantier, Guido Manselli, Marco Merlini, Gordon Childe, Marija Gimbutas, Yannick Rialland, M. Riehmschneider, Louis de la Valle Poussin, Olaf Hoekman, John Mandis, William Schiller, Raymond Dart, Lucian Cuesdean, Sbierea, A. Deac, George Denis, Mattie M.E., N. Densuseanu, B.P. Hajdeu, P Bosch, W. Kocka, Vladimir Gheorghiev, H. Henchen, B.V. Gornung, V Melinger, E. Michelet, A. Mozinski, W. Porzig, A. Sahmanov, Hugo Schmidt, W. Tomaschek, F.N. Tretiacov are among the huge number of specialists which consider Romania the place of otehr Europeans origines and Romanian the oldest language in Europe, older even than Sanskrit.
According to the researchers and scientists, the Latin comes from the old Romanian (or Thracian) and not vice versa. The so called "slave" words are in fact pure Romanian words. The so called vulgar Latin is in fact old Romanian, or Thracian language, according to the same sources...
The arguments sustaining the theories from above are very numerous and I don't want to go into them so deeply as long as the forum is and has to remain one languages dedicated, to.
In the limits of the language, please allow me to present a list of just a few (out of thousands of words), which are very similar/ even identical in Romanian and Sanskrit:
Romanian
numerals : unu, doi, trei, patru, cinci, sase, sapte...100=suta
Sanskrit
numerals: unu, dvi, tri, ciatru, penci, sas, saptan...100 = satan
then Romanian Sanskrit
acasa acasha (at home)
acu acu (now)
lup lup ( wolf)
a iubi (considered slave) iub (love)
frate vrate (brother)
camera camera (room)
limba lamba (tongue)
nepot napat (neffew)
mandru mandra (proud)
lupta lupta (fight)
pandur pandur (infanterist)
nevasta navasti (wife)
prieten prietema (friend)
pranz prans (lunch time)
Ruman Ramana (Romanian)
saptamana saptnahan (week)
struguri strughuri (grapes)
vale vale (valley)
vadana vadana (widow)
a zambi dzambaiami (to smile)
umbra dumbra (shadow)
om om (man-kind)
dusman dusman (enemy)
a invata invati (to study)
a crapa crapaiami (to break something)
naiba naiba (evil)
apa apa (water) and not AQUA like in Latin. It looks like aqua came from apa and not the other way around...
and so on for more than thousand situations...
According to M. Gimbutas, the confusion Roman (Romanian as in original language) = Roman (ancient Rom citizen), is generated by the fact that Romans and Romanians have been the same nation, the same people. The Dacians/Thracians and Romans have been twins. The illiterate peasants called Romanians, Ruman and not Roman. Why do they call so? Because RU-MANI, RA-MANI, RO-MANI, API, APULI, DACI and MAN-DA , VAL-AH are all synonyms expressing the person from the river banc or from the river valley. APII could be found under the form of mez-APPI in the ancient Italy, under he same name as the APPULI Dacians. APU-GLIA, (or Glia Romanilor in Romanian - Romanian land) can be found with this meaning only in Romanian (Glia= land)
In the Southern side of Italian "booth" exists the first neolitical site of Italy and it is called MOL-feta. The name itself has Romanian names, according to Guido A. Manselli: MOL-tzam (popular Thank you), MUL-tumire (satisfaction), na-MOL (mud); MOL-dova (province and river in Romania, Za-MOL-xis, Dacian divinity. Manselli said that this archaeological sit is 7,000 years old and has a balcanic feature.
I came up with this topic just to hear decent opinions and not banalities like those of a few days ago when while surfing for a language forum, I read all kind of suburban interventions. This topic is for people whith brain only. th-cam.com/video/IhDMWmGOBrA/w-d-xo.html
Аз съм българин
Tatar?
@Valentin Chakarov I'm not a Tatar though. Therefore I cannot be Bulgarian.
@Valentin Chakarov Can you just get to the point where Jesus is Bulgarian too?
Can you do alternative history of greece?
I have been asking that for more than a year now.
🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷
Great video! But there was a minor mistake with bosnia under Tvrtko I, you forgot the bosnian expansion into dalmatia which goes all the way to zadar after the death of the hungarian king.
Tengrist Turkish speaking Khaganate became Slavic speaking Christian Tsardom😐
Fatlinda Islami
What does this have to do with a 12 year old Albanian girl like you who lives with her parents in Gostivar?
@@petertodorov9540
th-cam.com/video/2doYxUe3ilg/w-d-xo.html&ab_channel=Dookumoftherookbrook
Zaista mi se svedeo video a pogotova kada sam cuo da si ubacio i srpsku muziku odmah sam te zapratio 😁
Nice video, next Irredentism In Balkan.But make it Realistic.
Some videos about Italy? Roman Empire? Would be epic
многу добре!!!
Много добре
Македониja
@@МариянБорисов-м7м аз сам българе
Τα ελληνικά είναι ινδοευρωπαϊκή γλώσσα
Τα αγγλικά είναι μια ινδοευρωπαϊκή γλώσσα του κλάδου της Δυτικής Γερμανίας. Αγγλικό γάλα, tocharian malke, Latin mulgeo, Old Irish melg, Greek amelgo, Russian moloko και ούτω καθεξής. Γλωσσικές, κειμενικές, γενετικές και αρχαιολογικές αποδείξεις για τη θεωρία της Ινδίας για τις ευρωπαϊκές γλώσσες εκτός της Ινδίας Άρματα Baghpat, Όπλα και το Άλογο στον Πολιτισμό του Χαράπα - Δρ. BK Manjul th-cam.com/video/fZvKpjjTpgg/w-d-xo.html Ευρήματα από την τελευταία γενετική μελέτη που διεξήγαγε η ASI σε συνεργασία με το Reich Lab στο Χάρβαρντ χρησιμοποιώντας αρχαίο DNA από το Rakhigarhi διαφάνειες στις 29:00
th-cam.com/video/Dio3Ep0nlv4/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/n4WFk0iEK5k/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/f0Lg1b_8N54/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/-wIu3dUsmtY/w-d-xo.html
Εδώ είναι οι φυλές που διαδίδουν τις ινδοευρωπαϊκές γλώσσες από τη Νότια Ασία στη Δυτική Ασία, την Κεντρική Ασία και την Ευρώπη
Avestan) Αφγανιστάν: Πρωτο-ιρανικό: Sairima (Śimyu), Dahi (Dāsa).
ΒΑ Αφγανιστάν: Πρωτο-Ιρανικό: Νυρτάνισι / Πιασίν (Viṣāṇin).
Πουτζουνιστάν (ΒΔ Πακιστάν), Νότιο Αφγανιστάν: Ιρανικό: Πουχούντα / Παστού (Paktha).
Μπαλουχιστάν (ΝΔ Πακιστάν), ΝΑ Ιράν: Ιρανικά: Μπολάν / Μπαλούτσι (Μπαλάνα).
ΒΑ Ιράν: Ιράν: Parthian / Parthava (Pṛthu / Pārthava).
ΝΔ Ιράν: Ιρανικό: Parsua / Persian (Parśu / Parśava).
ΒΔ Ιράν: Ιρανικό: Madai / Mede (Madra).
Ουζμπεκιστάν: Ιρανικό: Khiva / Khwarezmian (Śiva).
Δ. Τουρκμενιστάν: Ιρανικό: Dahae (Dāsa).
Ουκρανία, Ν, Ρωσία: Ιρανικά: Alan (Alina), Sarmatian (Śimyu).
Τουρκία: Thraco-Phrygian / Armenian: Phryge / Phrygian (Bhṛgu).
Ρουμανία, Βουλγαρία: Thraco-Phrygian / Armenian: Dacian (Dāsa).
Ελλάδα: Ελληνικά: Hellene (Alina).
Αλβανία: Αλβανικά: Sirmio (Śimyu).
Σρικάντ Γκανγκντάρ Ταλαγέρι
talageri.blogspot.com/2020/07/the-full-out-of-india-case-in-short.html
Πέντε κύματα ινδοευρωπαϊκής επέκτασης: ένα προκαταρκτικό μοντέλο (2018)
Igor A Tonoyan-Belyayev
Ι. Tonoyan-Belyayev
www.academia.edu/36998766/Five_waves_of_Indo-European_expansion_a_pritial_model_2018_
Can you do a new "countries of europe at their greatest extent" but this time more accurate and generally better and for every countries of the world? Would be cool
Most likely. Or I will just do a series which will focus on smaller European geographical areas . Forexample Scandinavia , western Europe etc.
@@historyrhymes1701 Great btw i love your videos especially the one that focus on the bulgarian-byzantine wars!
I am bulgarian and i have read a lot about bulgaria and every time i look at the borders they are wrong.Just sometimes the borders are not right.And i am reading a book about our history with a lot of details and pictures but still good video.
I'm french and we never study the Slav'History at the school . What is your origin ?And what do you do in History ? Thanks
Slavs coming to balkans in 7 century that is a good start.
bulgarian slavic make Cirilicy sript which today is use more then 300 miliona of people in the world :)
@@milankos7074 and that is a lie! Look at your DNA and some secrets will be revealed.
South Slavs, only Ex Yu no Bulgaria, have from 20% to even 75% illyrian DNA in some vilages.
@@mdkdjd4329 i just ignore this bulshit dnk
bulgarians are slavc people even in first bulgarian country i mean basic population is slavic , the king may be not but basic is slavic IT IS because first bulgarian country make slavic cultury and literatory for all slavic , take read some book , take read for all middle bulgarian shool, if the people in first buglarian empire are somthing different from slavic WHY THEY MAKE SLAVIC CULTURY. ?
the people from first bulgarian country created the CIRILICK SRIPT and you says thy are not slav ? hahaha
read for middle bulgarian shool idiot
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Preslav_Literary_School
At the beggining there was no difference between this tribes. They had the same genetics and spoke the same language. Today... It's just so different. And BTW, why is Serbia not colored most of the time? I understand that you colored only countries which were kingdoms/empires, but it should have been the independent countries. And either way, you could still just color Serbian succesor states after the fall of Serbian Empire (I mean that is what you have done with Bulgarian tsardoms). Greetings from Serbia!
I follow the way of mapping of the famous mappers. I only colour states when they reach the status of a kingdom or a higher than a princippality status. My plan at first was to colour Serbia in 1091 during the rule of Vukan when Serbia became a grand principality, but I decided that it will take me even more time to show all the serbian rulers from 1091 to1460. As of Bulgaria after 1356 the Tarnovo and Vidin tsardom were still tsardoms (empires) untill their fall in 1396. I shouldn't have coloured Dobruja (Karavuna) as it was a despotate. I also forgot to colour the Bosnian kingdom
There is no color in serbia because they are not independent most of the time
The name of the second bulgarian empire dynasty isn t Asan? Like Asănești? I mean, the familly origin is romanian/cuman so I think the second bulgarian empire is more like a romanian empire...
No, the name you give them isn't the original but with Romanian added sounds. The historiography around the world has found them and calls them Asen dynasty not Asănești, the were mixed, not 100% bulgarian, their origin isn't bulgarian but they never showed their allegiance to the former culture, they embraced the bulgarian culture as to get legitimacy when freeing Bulgaria in it's second empire, they changed their names and etc.
Is this Inkscape?
0:15 FYROM was named Dragovites?
No really, when the slavic tribes came into the macedonian lands, they started mixing with the ancient macedonians, the ancient macedonians accepted the slavic culture and the slavs accepted their name, and there you go.
@@Корки-я8з знам ама пак сме се викале некако Србија и Хрватска се викале исто а Словенија Карантанија
Босна покасно
@@greenbraltar6919 Знам али не не сите признаваат јбг
What happened why haven't you been posting videos?
Are you cooking something good?
🇷🇸♥️🇧🇬
We must take whole Balkan!
Mi first like
Nice i love Bulgaria and Bulgarians we never fought even when you invaded our land 🇦🇱❤🇧🇬
:D yess
Great video 👍🏼👍🏼 make jugoslavia BOLJE again 🇭🇷🇷🇸🇽🇰🇲🇪🇧🇦🇲🇰🇸🇮🇭🇺
Asparuh Khan found Turkish empire who got slavized but not slavic empire
First Bulgarian Empire has nothing to do with Slavic history just like Serbian Empire has nothing to do with Turk history
Fatlinda Islami
You are not a Turk so why do you pretend to be a Turk?
You are a 12 year old Albanian girl who lives with her mommy in Gostivar
@@petertodorov1792
th-cam.com/video/2doYxUe3ilg/w-d-xo.html
😆
@@petertodorov9540 Турците превзеха Цялият Канал
@@bulgariannationalist1637
Taya gaddina e arnaut
Bulgaria held south bessarabia 320 years
what was the music beetween 1490 amd 1815 some kind of rhodope gaida but what its called
Great work as always. Only you increase slightly the slavic settlements in Greece. The Slavs didn't settle in the whole Peloponnese. Slavic place names are absent from Argolis, most of Corinth, most of Elis and most of Cynuria. Instead Slavs settled in East Thessalia (Pelio, Magnesia), known as Belegezites.
The Danube River was very important in European history.. wow
u didnt inculde slovenia/carantania?
Good
7Bulgar 6,999 Subs can we reach ??? 7,000
I feel a bit bad of how most Bulgarians see the Macedonian people as brainwashed.
Saying that Macedonians are Bulgarian is like saying that Belarusians are Russian, or Slovaks are Czech.
History is a matter hardly explained because only people who possess power or did so in the past can change or write history.
It is the same of how we see Nazis as bad these days.
Let's look at something different.
Should we take the Roman Empire as a great historical power or an evil historical power?
Should we take the Third Reich as a great historical power or an evil historical power?
-Both did similar things such as extermination of other nationalities and ethnicities.
The Bulgarian nation has implemented propaganda in the territory of Macedonia which states that Macedonians are Bulgarians.
The so-called Pirin region of Macedonia is currently under Bulgaria and most of them say they are Bulgarians.
However, if you go to Macedonia in Greece, a lot of people will tell you they are Slavic and Macedonian. Not Greek and not Bulgarian.
This is due to the fact that the former Macedonian population in Bulgaria was made Bulgarian because of the highly similar languages and cultures.
Unlike the Bulgarian territory of Macedonia, in Greece, people are NOT ALLOWED to say they are Macedonian to the government, but they are Macedonian.
This is due to the fact that Greek propaganda failed because of its very different language and culture.
slushai sega decko :D ne sbori gluposti a sedni malce i pobaraj stranska istorija i cheti kolku vashata firomanska "istorija" nema vrzka so realniot svet.. vie ste drzava na 150 godini. Propagandata ja ima samo vo jugoslavskiot ti mozok poradi vashite "braka" srbite :) Ej sega ke ti dam naj-lesniot primer:
mk.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A6%D0%B0%D1%80_%D0%A1%D0%B0%D0%BC%D0%BE%D0%B8%D0%BB
Владеење 997−1014 год.
vidi sho pishva tamu - deka e bil car od 997 do 1014
sega baraj nekoja stranska karta i napishi primerno "Europe map 1000 A.D."
i vidi dali negde ima "makedonija" ili segde ima samo "Bulgaria" :)
educiraj se malce od stranski izvori na istorija i posle pishvaj "bugari tatari" i "makedonija e vecna" i tam site drugi vashi gluposti deka si gi znaete ot vreme ono veke 4 generacii pored...
Vanga sama go kaza - tam de e teklo voda pak ke teche, a vie si mislete dali sakate da si igrate na drzava so drugite 7-8 kuki "makedonci" oti ostanatite se samo shiptari.
pa vie dori jezik nemate bre .. sho znachi ova "makedonski" vo bulgarija ima po-tezki sluchai na dialekt ot vashiot "jezik" ama oni si znaat deka sa bulgari.. zaebi brat, zivi i zdravi :) Ne ste loshi luge, ama 200 godini anti-bulgarskata politika na srbite ot mnogo vreme е na jave vo glavata na poveketo "makedonci".
@@Raoxsttelle
the "common" (koine) language of this discuscussion is English.
some "good" points.
AFTER the Romans I doubt there were any Makedonians left from the male side of the DNA.. wars, campaigns, migration EAST.. If we think, that the 10K Makedonians Alexander released from the front (and came back with slaves) would have made a difference in the 2K years that have transpired we could be stretching it a bit.
And, if we take into account the exchange of populations started more than a hundred years ago in Makedonia, that leaves very few "macedonians" in the mix.....NOW...if both sides of the borders want to claim Makedoniality....LET THEM!!
History can not be rewritten, not in the 21 century. GET ALONG PEOPLE.
@@yiannimil1 Thank god, some good words written.
I laughed at you until I checked where you live. Now I just feel bad for you.
Actually Bulgaria falls in 1422 .... It's a big mistake .. and you didn't added 1040/41 under the Tsar Peter Delyan...
@throwaway 778 I don't have bro..
Make Saturn Bulgarian Again.
Check the maps in google if u dont believe jelous bitch
you should be a history teacher
Song?
I made BULGARIA in a Nutshell btw.
Proto-Bulgarians were Turkic semi-nomadic tribe however modern Bulgarians are Slavicized and they are now Slavs.
More of a mixed irano-turkic people as almost all genetic antropological tests point out that their origin or atleast by the 7th and 8th centuries were almost fully indoeuropean. Still that doesn't change the fact that the first Bulgarian empire was built on the union between the seven Slavic tribes and Asparukh's Bulgarians.
As of Asparukh it is also an Iranian name, almost all of the names of our rulers were of iranic (mainly avestian) origin
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asparukh_(name)
Bulgarian empire mapping Yes thats true, Bulgarians are really mystic and unique people you cant tell that they are full slavic but also that they are full turkic. Also old Bulgarians rulers had “Khan” title which it is origin and typical from far east Mongolia, China etc. I think that Bulgarians should be on there own unique tribe who nowadays speak on slavic language.
Bulgarian empire mapping I mean its batter to dont call themselves slavs, turks or iranians just simple Bulgars or Bulgarians. Its just unique people who pick up some stuff from other tribes during there long history.
Bulgarian empire mapping Sorry for bad english i hope you understand what i want to tell you.
Hey brother, please make a video with the largest extension of the countries with all the world please
Next video?
Why you didn't join Yugoslavia?
BTW Serbia didn't have enter on Adriatic sea that was a land of Red Croatia.
Bulgaria didn't joined Yugoslavia because it (Bulgaria) was a part of the Warsaw pact. And cause of this a satellite satate of the USSR which had bad relations with Yugoslavia.
@@doookkk I thinked from 1918 and 1945. Warszaw pact is founded 14 May 1955, so you 10 year didn't join Second Yugoslavia just to be on Warszaw Pact.
@@markocroatia7630 The reasons are many, in short: Serbia.
@@Raoxsttelle We completly understand that.
@@Raoxsttelle
the REASON is simple...RELIGION... from the 10th, 11th century Latin conquests...just like the Russo-Ukranian Front
What about ragusa? And sorry if I’m wrong but I thought Croatia was never fully occupied by the ottomans
Ragusa was like half slavic half latin. And Croatia wasn't fully under Turkish rule but it was under Austrian/Hungarian
Proud Montenigga I still would call it Croatian
@@scepan5155 razlika je između okupacije i osvajanjem zemlje i potpisom ugovora sa zemljom
@@plavideckozg277 Pa to je još gore! Sami ste sebe predali pod tudjinsku vlast bez borbe. To je razlika između svih balkanskih naroda i Srbijanaca i Crnogoraca. Bugari kad dobise samostalnost pozvase nemacku dinastiju, Rumuni isto,Grci isto, vi Hrvati 1000+ godina porvjedoste pod tudjinom. Jedino Crna Gora i Srbija imaše svoje dinastije na Balkanu u 19. i 20. vijeku.
@@scepan5155 važno je da nismo jurišati za osmanlijama na druge kršćane!
Bosniaks are Croats😱 We didn't know that 🤣
Bosniaks are muslim Serbs
it looks like Trieste belongs to Slovenia in 2019??? Are you crazy??
Let's us not forget that we are Tracians and Dacians .... Bulgarian Romanian Serbian an half of Europe. We are.. Tracians and Dacians 😊,! The same blood !