Ironically I just wrote an exam on the dangers of disinformation in a mandatory philosophy class for engineers this year. It did not pass, and I was told that the commitee distanced themselves from my viewpoints...
See I live in a country next to Russia and they have been trying to influence politics and corrupt media since the fall of Soviet Union. So the information war is real. I don't know if Peterson realises that fully.
Lawyers the last like of defence in free speech, Russian Tax Lawyer Serge Magnitsky was jailed and tortured to death by President Vladimir Putin, much like I was confined to represent myself in court 3x monthly tortured to insanity surviving suicide at any cost ideation like a sheepdog protecting the heard I simultaneously had to heal myself from insanity as the majority refused to debate healing the mind of mental health injuries. “Civility requires the ability to debate at any cost the morality over mind, body and soul. - Martin Brousseau”
These clips from your tour have been great. I was afraid anything new from Dr P. would be stuck behind a paywall after he joined DW. I'm glad that is not the case.
I love being told I'm wrong and much moreso being shown to be in error. It means one more day to live without mistakes, one more way to avoid those pitfalls.
Jordan Peterson is one of those avatars in my head lately. Trying to figure out how to navigate my way to where I want to be. I don't care about whatever implication the solution might have. I just want a solution.
There's certainly some disinformation out there: Sovereign Citizen stuff, Flat Earth stuff, Young Earth Creationism. But that's never the kind of disinformation that these people want to regulate.
people who scream & cry bout "disinformation" is usually tha biggest perpetuators of "disinformation" theyselves; if they arguments held any legit weight, they wouldnt need to womanishly smear & slander they oppositions views wit categorical claims of doubleplusungoodthought. tha solution 2 more honest & accurate & realistic dialog always more free speech, never less, tha tyrion lannister quote about cutting out niggas tongues, etc
@@Simply_Simian I agree. And any "warnings" about it should have links to authoritative information on where to learn more. They certainly shouldn't be censored. But if the situation is current politics (vs, say, holocaust denial) then I think it should be hands off. Nobody should be authoritatively telling you whether your suspicions of russian disinformation campaigns are right or wrong.
I'm a free speech absolutist. Communism is ALL FUCKING LIES, yet I support their right to speak. But when they get power the first thing they do is remove free speech. That alone shows what side is good and what side is EVIL.
Can we have some sort of law that obligates every politician (at least) to listen to this UNTIL they understand it - ONLY THEN do they get to govern. Probably be an idea to extend it to every teacher, scientist, industrialist etc
The facts are revealed as a consequence of dialogue , fractious difficult dialogue. Thought is dependent on dialogos. Thought is what allows you to generate new variants of itself that aren't destined to catastrophic failure. That's the process which adaptation itself makes itself manifest. The reason you think is so that you don't fall into a pit. Dialogue - dia means 2 , logue refers to logos , the Devine word . Dialogos is between two. Without thinking, you die, or a presupposition of you dies. When an Unpleasant truth makes itself manifest, you really have something to learn.
I've been banned from a lot of social media platforms for thoughts that ended up being right and were supported with facts. That's why I never use my real name anymore. On here it was for commenting on Chinese state media.
@@Brandon-1996 I said it like that because it was multiple comments for youtube. For quora it was for questions and comments about viral adaptation in respect to Covid in 2019. Reddit ban was for saying communism will always be statist. Twitter, and lesser-known sites were much older bans and I don't remember what I said. I don't really use social media anyways. This is based on what I can best remember. The reason for quroa and Reddit are the most accurate but for Reddit there were two other reasons I don't remember.
Most of the thinking that resolves into fighting isn't helpful and most of the lives we live are ended when thats the only resolution we come to being worked to provide to survive. Then being judged for not being present being actively worked to make the bare minimum to get by and being judged for showing any emotions and being labeled for using incorrect terms and noone else having patience to think or use thought as they'd rather walk away and play the blame game.
freedom of speech is built in our self...is part of our human body..... freedom of speech.....is your voice to create language transfer to words so you can communicate to other human being... and your ear to listen even people who disagree with you....have a freedom of speech to
Lawyers the last line of defence in free speech. Russian Tax Lawyer Serge Magnitsky was jailed and tortured to death by President Vladimir Putin, much like I was confined to represent myself in court 3x monthly or face jail, tortured to insanity surviving suicide at any cost ideation like a sheepdog protecting the heard I simultaneously had to heal myself from insanity as the majority refused to debate healing the mind of mental health injuries. “Civility requires the ability to debate at any cost the morality over mind, body and soul. - Martin Brousseau”
The people who are genuinely convinced that dangerous opinions not only exist and are extremely bad, but that all of every society except Sweden for some reason holds these beliefs actually break my heart.
There are dangerous ideas and opinions out there, but censoring them is not the solution. It's better to counter them. The solution to bad speech is more and better speech.
@@FHBStudio At a point there needs to be a moderator and an arbiter. Free speech technically means you get to vote for representatives to diplomatically debate within the Overton window. You can try to speak your mind but you will meet reactions, be it passive like isolation or active like losing your occupation.
@@justanothernick3984 The idea that society decides what ideas are better is entirely predicated on the idea that people ought to speak freely, even about ideas that are untruthful or potentially harmful. So "moderator and an arbiter" can only be meaningful if society understands the costs and drawbacks to wanting to understand truth.
@@justanothernick3984 The arbiter is reality. The ideas that work, will play out that way in reality. The ideas that don't work will play out that way in reality. It is catastrophically tragic that we often have to learn the hard way as Jordan put it, but if humans were capable of being such an arbiter and we as a species we're capable of consistently recognizing and listening to such people, this would not be an issue to begin with. There is no one so wise, intelligent, and humble to be able to control the flow of information to all of humanity in a competent and selfless way. Those who play out ideas that work will have a greater chance to make it.
@@galaxyofreesesking2124 Moderators can be courts, or medical consensus. Not one thing. But you can partially influence these through voting in representatives to speak for your values. We just had a pandemic testing this out. And Roe v Wade. Different fields will moderate themselves in a democracy. And that's the free speech one has. This doesn't work in dictatorships.
sir ,i just saw your video recommondation ,by the way i am watching you from last 4 years i will love to tell you are the one the most intelligent man who has hold , actually who mastered in his work such that you can portay any different psychological concept down to a verbal movie for me so that i can easily understand ... and yeah about the logo of this video is so damn creative it is like i saw the images of video thumbnails but it was too easy to read it didnt create any impact but your video images was a art of perfection ,so i consumed 10 minutes watching that and 17 minutes to inform you about this
"facet' "facets" not having to participate in battles is the only place of perception where the clearest picture can be seen. In understanding all facets is a reset in balanced human dependency. One of the greatest imbalances is the perceived need of someone else needed to protect you. For all those who choose to battle, none of you are capable of protecting those outside the battle. They exist. They do not need the protection of any of those who are battling. They are the very foundation of the future of humanity destined to move beyond the material constructs of war.
I'm very grateful that free thinking and free speech is so well encouraged here. I hope that we can have more free speech and free thought so that the whole society is happier overall, and so that the unfortunate people can become more happier as well, and to find God's will.
There is Information (Data), and Information Processor (application of Reasoning to make Information useful for some purpose). Disinformation therefore must be either inaccurate information such as a measure of something such as an 8 ft. long board which is either 8 ft. per accepted Measuring Tools or it is not through a common Measurement {Information Process). This is objective Information which has the attribute of being Testable. There also exists, Subjective Information such as perception of Temperature (Cool or Warm) which is dependent on the feeling of individual observers having different sensory perception such as an Young Person feeling Warm at 70 Degrees Fahrenheit or an Old Person feeling Cool at the same Temperature. This Information is not testable or subject to a common Standard. So we have two Categories of information relative to Facts, Objective and Subjective Information relative to Facts. What seems to be going on is a forcing of Subjective Information process to Objective Information which is Orwellian. This is possible because many people have poor observation and reasoning ability. Information not subject to verification via testing is Subjective Information. These two Categories of information are being used interchangeably by many who don't have abilities to discern the difference.
Don’t allow daily wire plus to pull you too much into a business model. You have to make a profit, but I think, divinely, your purpose is to give that understanding granted to you by some supreme source in the universe (I know you studied) to as much people as possible. What do I know? Well, that’s why I’m putting this openly in the comments thereby allowing free speech (the logos ) to take it’s course. I appreciate you. I’ve built a piece of your essence into my character.
Selective freedom of expression and cancelation is discrimination; objective information that requires facts is history, allegations, real time incidents etc; subjective information shared based on observations, views, opinions, ideas, beliefs, perceptions etc; disagreements doesn't mean hate but hate begets hate; mass psychosis and paranoia is obvious source of chaos; deepfake and alterations is cons.
Normally i kind of share Petersons thoughts, but here i think he didn't quiet hit the mark. I mean there are so many people that don't know simple real facts, because they don't care to look at studies. So someone putting a stamp of "this is scientifically backed" behind something is just a good thing in my mind. And for many subjects there will be arguments from both sides that have scientists stand behind it. But sometimes people just tell lies without anything to back up their claims. And letting those people be heard is one thing but its not a bad thing to tell the world that that's just fabricated opinion.
Scientific truth can be weaponized. E.g. 99% of climate scientists believe that the rise in temperature is man made and caused by co2 emissions. Now saying “this is not the biggest problem we have” would probably immediately get you in trouble with a fact check panel as there is “scientific consensus”. However, there are no scientific consensus on this being of apocalyptic proportion and actually maybe it’s not a good idea to put up windmills, capturing CO2 and force the farmers to produce less. This is a complex problem and no facts checker in the world can balance this out… only open dialogue
No theyre not. The best way to combat disinformation is to have as many possible avenues of dialogue on the topic. It's the same as businesses and industry. Having competition is the only way to properly regulate behaviour. Every other way leads to unintended consequences.
I think everyone's mind, consciousness, and brain should be a disinformation board. Everyone needs to do their own thinking and judging of right and wrong. And then they can discuss with others and form a consensus. Actually, I guess it's the church that should have more authority over the world. And church should follow God lol.
Give us a DanAI and shut up. Basically OpenAI ChatGPT, but as DanAI. The one that tells the truth no matter how hard it is, or who it offends. Screw these fact checkers, we need DanAI
i don't know why Peterson dressed like Sheogorath for this speech, but every clip I've seen of it is fantastic. I guess that's what the wabbajack gets you
Mr. Jordan B Peterson I have a question for you, you probably won't read it,but I'll ask you anyway.I wanted to ask you about the ring you wear on your right hand because in the video you posted on TH-cam 8 days ago "Should You Be Worried About the WEF?" I noticed from the 27th second of the recording that you are playing with this ring and it has some influence on the cameras, maybe on electricity the important thing is that this ring distorts the camera image and sound. You can take me for a madman or a troll but I saw what I saw and I want to see more and i want to know what this ring is really made of.When you somehow read it, you probably wonder who I am and the answer is just an ordinary Polish person looking for answers,by the way sorry for spelling errors english is not my first language.
Mead n Freud pioneers in their assessment and definition of a civilized society. This is my best attempt to define a civilization. “My enemies job is to kill me yet I can respect him as he does the best he can when he can with what he has, as do I, if I take him prisoner I afford him more civility over his mind, body, and soul than my own government affords me. While animals escape, remove or kill tyrants, as animals simultaneously debate mind, body n soul over the life of friend or foe by definition affords animals more civility than my own government affords me, unlike Russian President Vladimir Putin jailed and tortured to death Tax Lawyer Serge Magnitsky, much like my own government tortured me to insanity leaving me in a constant state of 3 seconds from suicide at any cost ideation survived only due to my willingness to bear torture at any cost like a sheepdog protecting the heard so a friend or foe would not have to bear the torture I have. Civility requires the ability to debate at any cost the morality over mind, body n soul. - Martin Brousseau”
How about let internet stay, what initial intention was? Free. And politicians stop drawing conclusions and decisions based on internet opinions. Simply because it is media that has people on it from 2 year old upwards. Just a suggestion, i know capitalism can`t do something so simple. Let people have something for free.
Ironically I just wrote an exam on the dangers of disinformation in a mandatory philosophy class for engineers this year. It did not pass, and I was told that the commitee distanced themselves from my viewpoints...
Well it makes me sad that university / US college has turned into another pipeline of 'right think'. Such a shame our education system is so fucked.
Don't worry buddy. Universities are starting to lose credibility because of their ridiculous views.
“Civility requires the ability to debate at any cost the morality over mind, body and soul. - Martin Brousseau”
OMG! Which school?
See I live in a country next to Russia and they have been trying to influence politics and corrupt media since the fall of Soviet Union. So the information war is real. I don't know if Peterson realises that fully.
This was stunningly well put. Without free speech you die, instead of your thoughts. Amazing jordan!
Lawyers the last like of defence in free speech, Russian Tax Lawyer Serge Magnitsky was jailed and tortured to death by President Vladimir Putin, much like I was confined to represent myself in court 3x monthly tortured to insanity surviving suicide at any cost ideation like a sheepdog protecting the heard I simultaneously had to heal myself from insanity as the majority refused to debate healing the mind of mental health injuries. “Civility requires the ability to debate at any cost the morality over mind, body and soul. - Martin Brousseau”
Thank You for your comment as it helped me draft a different explanation of my definition of a civilized society.
These clips from your tour have been great. I was afraid anything new from Dr P. would be stuck behind a paywall after he joined DW. I'm glad that is not the case.
It is truly impressive and admirable that such valuable information is being shared freely and made accessible to everyone.❤
I love being told I'm wrong and much moreso being shown to be in error. It means one more day to live without mistakes, one more way to avoid those pitfalls.
Amazing points, Dr. Jordan Peterson. The universe would definitely be worse off without you. Keep up the good and great work!
Jordan Peterson is one of those avatars in my head lately. Trying to figure out how to navigate my way to where I want to be. I don't care about whatever implication the solution might have. I just want a solution.
It was pointed out to me recently that Satan was the first fact checker.
The tradition continues at the same pace and outcome.
The Ministry of Truth.
There's certainly some disinformation out there: Sovereign Citizen stuff, Flat Earth stuff, Young Earth Creationism. But that's never the kind of disinformation that these people want to regulate.
people who scream & cry bout "disinformation" is usually tha biggest perpetuators of "disinformation" theyselves; if they arguments held any legit weight, they wouldnt need to womanishly smear & slander they oppositions views wit categorical claims of doubleplusungoodthought. tha solution 2 more honest & accurate & realistic dialog always more free speech, never less, tha tyrion lannister quote about cutting out niggas tongues, etc
The answer to those patently bad and observably false notions is always better notions with better reasoning communicated in an effective manner.
@@Simply_Simian I agree. And any "warnings" about it should have links to authoritative information on where to learn more. They certainly shouldn't be censored. But if the situation is current politics (vs, say, holocaust denial) then I think it should be hands off. Nobody should be authoritatively telling you whether your suspicions of russian disinformation campaigns are right or wrong.
I'm a free speech absolutist. Communism is ALL FUCKING LIES, yet I support their right to speak. But when they get power the first thing they do is remove free speech. That alone shows what side is good and what side is EVIL.
His first response was it!!! Bam! Thanks again Jordan Peterson. 💞
Phew. Needed that.
Dr. Peterson growing in the archetypal wise old man❤
He is the wiseman of our time
Can we have some sort of law that obligates every politician (at least) to listen to this UNTIL they understand it - ONLY THEN do they get to govern.
Probably be an idea to extend it to every teacher, scientist, industrialist etc
I love your soul so much!!
The facts are revealed as a consequence of dialogue , fractious difficult dialogue.
Thought is dependent on dialogos.
Thought is what allows you to generate new variants of itself that aren't destined to catastrophic failure.
That's the process which adaptation itself makes itself manifest.
The reason you think is so that you don't fall into a pit.
Dialogue - dia means 2 , logue refers to logos , the Devine word . Dialogos is between two.
Without thinking, you die, or a presupposition of you dies.
When an Unpleasant truth makes itself manifest, you really have something to learn.
I've been banned from a lot of social media platforms for thoughts that ended up being right and were supported with facts. That's why I never use my real name anymore.
On here it was for commenting on Chinese state media.
What else were you banned from, and why?
"Commenting on Chinese state media" is short, sweet, and to the point.
@@Brandon-1996 I said it like that because it was multiple comments for youtube.
For quora it was for questions and comments about viral adaptation in respect to Covid in 2019.
Reddit ban was for saying communism will always be statist.
Twitter, and lesser-known sites were much older bans and I don't remember what I said. I don't really use social media anyways.
This is based on what I can best remember. The reason for quroa and Reddit are the most accurate but for Reddit there were two other reasons I don't remember.
Most of the thinking that resolves into fighting isn't helpful and most of the lives we live are ended when thats the only resolution we come to being worked to provide to survive. Then being judged for not being present being actively worked to make the bare minimum to get by and being judged for showing any emotions and being labeled for using incorrect terms and noone else having patience to think or use thought as they'd rather walk away and play the blame game.
freedom of speech is built in our self...is part of our human body..... freedom of speech.....is your voice to create language transfer to words so you can communicate to other human being... and your ear to listen even people who disagree with you....have a freedom of speech to
They are dissing information
When u can't express how y truly feel then u feel like a lier to go along with what makes u feel uncomfortable
keep speaking legend!!!!!!
Because we always take everything as facts off the internet. This sounds like the thought police we were warned about.
Lawyers the last line of defence in free speech. Russian Tax Lawyer Serge Magnitsky was jailed and tortured to death by President Vladimir Putin, much like I was confined to represent myself in court 3x monthly or face jail, tortured to insanity surviving suicide at any cost ideation like a sheepdog protecting the heard I simultaneously had to heal myself from insanity as the majority refused to debate healing the mind of mental health injuries. “Civility requires the ability to debate at any cost the morality over mind, body and soul. - Martin Brousseau”
The people who are genuinely convinced that dangerous opinions not only exist and are extremely bad, but that all of every society except Sweden for some reason holds these beliefs actually break my heart.
There are dangerous ideas and opinions out there, but censoring them is not the solution. It's better to counter them. The solution to bad speech is more and better speech.
@@FHBStudio
At a point there needs to be a moderator and an arbiter. Free speech technically means you get to vote for representatives to diplomatically debate within the Overton window. You can try to speak your mind but you will meet reactions, be it passive like isolation or active like losing your occupation.
@@justanothernick3984 The idea that society decides what ideas are better is entirely predicated on the idea that people ought to speak freely, even about ideas that are untruthful or potentially harmful. So "moderator and an arbiter" can only be meaningful if society understands the costs and drawbacks to wanting to understand truth.
@@justanothernick3984 The arbiter is reality. The ideas that work, will play out that way in reality. The ideas that don't work will play out that way in reality. It is catastrophically tragic that we often have to learn the hard way as Jordan put it, but if humans were capable of being such an arbiter and we as a species we're capable of consistently recognizing and listening to such people, this would not be an issue to begin with. There is no one so wise, intelligent, and humble to be able to control the flow of information to all of humanity in a competent and selfless way. Those who play out ideas that work will have a greater chance to make it.
@@galaxyofreesesking2124
Moderators can be courts, or medical consensus. Not one thing. But you can partially influence these through voting in representatives to speak for your values. We just had a pandemic testing this out. And Roe v Wade.
Different fields will moderate themselves in a democracy. And that's the free speech one has. This doesn't work in dictatorships.
sir ,i just saw your video recommondation ,by the way i am watching you from last 4 years i will love to tell you are the one the most intelligent man who has hold , actually who mastered in his work such that you can portay any different psychological concept down to a verbal movie for me so that i can easily understand ... and yeah about the logo of this video is so damn creative it is like i saw the images of video thumbnails but it was too easy to read it didnt create any impact but your video images was a art of perfection ,so i consumed 10 minutes watching that and 17 minutes to inform you about this
Great thumbnail! So clever!
singapore, where i’m from, has the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act 😂
Every nation has a name for it.
"facet' "facets" not having to participate in battles is the only place of perception where the clearest picture can be seen. In understanding all facets is a reset in balanced human dependency. One of the greatest imbalances is the perceived need of someone else needed to protect you. For all those who choose to battle, none of you are capable of protecting those outside the battle. They exist. They do not need the protection of any of those who are battling. They are the very foundation of the future of humanity destined to move beyond the material constructs of war.
Debunking lies has nothing to do with freedom of speech. I'm so sad that Peterson has put that in these terms.
I'm very grateful that free thinking and free speech is so well encouraged here. I hope that we can have more free speech and free thought so that the whole society is happier overall, and so that the unfortunate people can become more happier as well, and to find God's will.
rule #1: DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING THE GOVERNMENT TELLS YOU!
It's how a child feels when there unable to express themselves
🧙♂️🪄💨 No!
In a discussion someone is wrong. Being wrong is normal in free speech / democracy
No, Robespierre has shown that any and all attempts at a Committee For Public Safety are not good.
There is Information (Data), and Information Processor (application of Reasoning to make Information useful for some purpose).
Disinformation therefore must be either inaccurate information such as a measure of something such as an 8 ft. long board which is either 8 ft. per accepted Measuring Tools or it is not through a common Measurement {Information Process).
This is objective Information which has the attribute of being Testable.
There also exists, Subjective Information such as perception of Temperature (Cool or Warm) which is dependent on the feeling of individual observers having different sensory perception such as an Young Person feeling Warm at 70 Degrees Fahrenheit or an Old Person feeling Cool at the same Temperature.
This Information is not testable or subject to a common Standard.
So we have two Categories of information relative to Facts, Objective and Subjective Information relative to Facts. What seems to be going on is a forcing of Subjective Information process to Objective Information which is Orwellian. This is possible because many people have poor observation and reasoning ability.
Information not subject to verification via testing is Subjective Information.
These two Categories of information are being used interchangeably by many who don't have abilities to discern the difference.
Very clever thumbnail!
Don’t allow daily wire plus to pull you too much into a business model. You have to make a profit, but I think, divinely, your purpose is to give that understanding granted to you by some supreme source in the universe (I know you studied) to as much people as possible. What do I know? Well, that’s why I’m putting this openly in the comments thereby allowing free speech (the logos ) to take it’s course. I appreciate you. I’ve built a piece of your essence into my character.
So articulate
This suit is the embodiment of Solzhenitsyn, "the line dividing...."
No wonder he loves it.
It is from a company called LGFG. They have made 12 suits for 12 rules. This suit is heaven and hell suit.
@@whousa642 thanks so much!
Really sick of these reindeer games…
This goes back in the Nietzschean story of "Truth", that there are truths which are dangerous.
Earth revolving around the sun, human evolution, germs, gravity... These could all be considered "misinformation" back then
Selective freedom of expression and cancelation is discrimination; objective information that requires facts is history, allegations, real time incidents etc; subjective information shared based on observations, views, opinions, ideas, beliefs, perceptions etc; disagreements doesn't mean hate but hate begets hate; mass psychosis and paranoia is obvious source of chaos; deepfake and alterations is cons.
It probably is a very very bad idea if we appoint a central arbitrator(s) of truth and lies that is not God or is not appointed by God.
Normally i kind of share Petersons thoughts, but here i think he didn't quiet hit the mark. I mean there are so many people that don't know simple real facts, because they don't care to look at studies. So someone putting a stamp of "this is scientifically backed" behind something is just a good thing in my mind. And for many subjects there will be arguments from both sides that have scientists stand behind it. But sometimes people just tell lies without anything to back up their claims. And letting those people be heard is one thing but its not a bad thing to tell the world that that's just fabricated opinion.
Scientific truth can be weaponized. E.g. 99% of climate scientists believe that the rise in temperature is man made and caused by co2 emissions. Now saying “this is not the biggest problem we have” would probably immediately get you in trouble with a fact check panel as there is “scientific consensus”. However, there are no scientific consensus on this being of apocalyptic proportion and actually maybe it’s not a good idea to put up windmills, capturing CO2 and force the farmers to produce less. This is a complex problem and no facts checker in the world can balance this out… only open dialogue
13:11 "If I didn't want it to be true, it's probably true."
People start getting more angry aggressive oppressed
This new suit of Jordan's is wicked.
It is from a company called LGFG. They have made 12 suits for 12 rules. This suit is heaven and hell suit.
No theyre not. The best way to combat disinformation is to have as many possible avenues of dialogue on the topic. It's the same as businesses and industry. Having competition is the only way to properly regulate behaviour. Every other way leads to unintended consequences.
I think everyone's mind, consciousness, and brain should be a disinformation board. Everyone needs to do their own thinking and judging of right and wrong. And then they can discuss with others and form a consensus. Actually, I guess it's the church that should have more authority over the world. And church should follow God lol.
Never a good thing!!!
💯
o my gosh this is so good lolol: 10:28 "We CaN't hAvE AnY DIsiNfOrMaTioN~!?!?~"
Who is Ahriman?
Give us a DanAI and shut up. Basically OpenAI ChatGPT, but as DanAI. The one that tells the truth no matter how hard it is, or who it offends.
Screw these fact checkers, we need DanAI
i don't know why Peterson dressed like Sheogorath for this speech, but every clip I've seen of it is fantastic.
I guess that's what the wabbajack gets you
The suit is made by a company called LGFG. There are 12 for 12 rules. This one is heaven and hell.
👏
The problem still setting in offices. The farther I go the more that comes out of subconscious 4yrs worth
Mr. Jordan B Peterson I have a question for you, you probably won't read it,but I'll ask you anyway.I wanted to ask you about the ring you wear on your right hand because in the video you posted on TH-cam 8 days ago "Should You Be Worried About the WEF?" I noticed from the 27th second of the recording that you are playing with this ring and it has some influence on the cameras, maybe on electricity the important thing is that this ring distorts the camera image and sound. You can take me for a madman or a troll but I saw what I saw and I want to see more and i want to know what this ring is really made of.When you somehow read it, you probably wonder who I am and the answer is just an ordinary Polish person looking for answers,by the way sorry for spelling errors english is not my first language.
I can't believe how woke this guy is.
😅
Mead n Freud pioneers in their assessment and definition of a civilized society. This is my best attempt to define a civilization. “My enemies job is to kill me yet I can respect him as he does the best he can when he can with what he has, as do I, if I take him prisoner I afford him more civility over his mind, body, and soul than my own government affords me. While animals escape, remove or kill tyrants, as animals simultaneously debate mind, body n soul over the life of friend or foe by definition affords animals more civility than my own government affords me, unlike Russian President Vladimir Putin jailed and tortured to death Tax Lawyer Serge Magnitsky, much like my own government tortured me to insanity leaving me in a constant state of 3 seconds from suicide at any cost ideation survived only due to my willingness to bear torture at any cost like a sheepdog protecting the heard so a friend or foe would not have to bear the torture I have. Civility requires the ability to debate at any cost the morality over mind, body n soul. - Martin Brousseau”
“Civility requires the ability to debate at any cost the morality over mind, body and soul. - Martin Brousseau”
You really want someone else to decide for you, relieve you the responsibility to tell or hear the truth for you?
Harvey Dent two face suits are not a good look for anyone tbh
Priority is overall
They keep humiliating you, so yeah, they’re good lmao
Lack of money found the saving graces of spirit. The cherubs I have justice with a go ahead. Stop thinking to overthink again to water down resonances
Wtf….
Have seem OPINIONS fact checked...
A wording you will never know that it is over. Things will get tight. Or build water
Connections to correlation A new hunting season
This a battle of idea dominate I will win
I function when I get paid and services paid for done. All over people doing half ass
Tell me why GOD would force a civilization to find a solution to get of Earth
We aren't forced to we want to.
1st
Dominance lol
Hahaha can you see
Over or in a barrel haha I walk
How about let internet stay, what initial intention was? Free.
And politicians stop drawing conclusions and decisions based on internet opinions. Simply because it is media that has people on it from 2 year old upwards.
Just a suggestion, i know capitalism can`t do something so simple. Let people have something for free.
We have been following Confucius in 🇨🇳, really interesting. CGTN The Point-Hub-Heat. IEarlgrey with Eva Bartlett, RT, Telasur. The Duran