I Tried Cultured Meat: Is It The Future of Food?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 มิ.ย. 2024
  • Cultured Meat appears to be the new normal in food, so we decided to take them on a taste test and the results were pretty good.
    0:00 Intro
    0:55 Upside Foods - Cultivated Chicken
    3:00 What is Cultured Meat?
    4:18 Good Food Institute Survey
    4:35 Steakholder Foods 3D Printed Steak
    6:00 Steakholder Foods Hybrid Meat
    6:37 SciFi Foods
    9:59 Outro
    Read the CNET article: We Tried Cultivated Meat, and It's Tasty
    www.cnet.com/news/we-tried-cu...
    Subscribe to CNET: / cnettv
    Never miss a deal again! See CNET’s browser extension 👉 bit.ly/3lO7sOU
    Follow us on TikTok: / cnetdotcom
    Follow us on Instagram: / cnet
    Follow us on Twitter: / cnet
    Like us on Facebook: / cnet
    #food #foodtech #culturedmeat
  • วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี

ความคิดเห็น • 574

  • @AvatarAang926
    @AvatarAang926 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    I'm vegetarian, but would consider eating this. it takes ethics out of the equation because there is no slaughter taking place, and minimal harm being caused to the animal, as they explained the animals are sedated when the stem cells are extracted

    • @diamondcentraltechnology971
      @diamondcentraltechnology971 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I gues you dont count your self as being slaughter. who are you people...

    • @SilverSilence002
      @SilverSilence002 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I think vegetarians are perverts. What does eating meat has to do with ethics? You human?!

    • @devvyas6751
      @devvyas6751 หลายเดือนก่อน

      you know cows are killed in dairy as well right? After they can't produce milk anymore they go to the same slaughterhouse as beef cattle.

  • @datacipher
    @datacipher ปีที่แล้ว +93

    I am a huge carnivore and always have been. If this is proven safe and affordable I will switch. I’ve never been proud of the astounding cruelty we inflict.

    • @chesi_7_0_79
      @chesi_7_0_79 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Same, I love chicken but hate Killin em

    • @datacipher
      @datacipher 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@chesi_7_0_79 yes unfortunately looking into it, it’s completely impractical and won’t happen anytime soon.

    • @cleangreen2210
      @cleangreen2210 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      There will never be a perfect time to stand up and do what is right. You know torturing animals is wrong. Maybe a stand.

    • @CS-en5xz
      @CS-en5xz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Outta your damn mind

    • @Wen6543
      @Wen6543 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      @@cleangreen2210 You have any idea about how many animals are killed for cultivating your greens, making your clothes, your habitat, etc? You want to save those animals? You know what you have to do... do what is right.

  • @artistsanomalous7369
    @artistsanomalous7369 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    The burger looks good. The steak...well to use a teacher's euphemism, it's "still developing".

  • @haruspex1-50
    @haruspex1-50 ปีที่แล้ว +50

    I can imagine this becoming weird in the future. Where celebrities with only fans sell their own cultured meat to their fans who want to eat them. I’m telling you…it’s gonna happen

    • @KManAbout
      @KManAbout ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Totally possible and weirdly interesting

    • @awsome14619
      @awsome14619 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      That is freaky.

    • @mauriceinge5241
      @mauriceinge5241 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s not impossible

    • @jorgepreciado6984
      @jorgepreciado6984 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So what? You are eating animal dead bodies right now, babe

    • @dmitryshusterman9494
      @dmitryshusterman9494 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Cultured meat is simply not gonna happen. It's expensive and bad for environment, and pretty much impossible on industrial scale. Even if sold, it'll be some Frankenstein food, mixed in with who knows what by the food processing companies. No thanks.

  • @heavylurker
    @heavylurker ปีที่แล้ว +67

    We are now printing steaks. What a time to be alive.

    • @muhammadghazy8
      @muhammadghazy8 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Amazing time

    • @Robert.Smith6969
      @Robert.Smith6969 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      @@muhammadghazy8 more like horrible

    • @SaturnineXTS
      @SaturnineXTS ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@Robert.Smith6969 come on, don't hate. If this was made from plant matter and only masquerading as meat I'd understand, but it's the real deal

    • @cleangreen2210
      @cleangreen2210 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@SaturnineXTS Plant foods were the original meat. Religions and this evil society twisted it up. Now murder masquerading as sanity is rampant.

    • @dmitryshusterman9494
      @dmitryshusterman9494 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@Robert.Smith6969unfortunately, it's completely impractical at scale, as well as polluting. This vid is disingenuous hype, prbly by an industry shill

  • @6shnuggle6
    @6shnuggle6 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    In regards to pollution (methane), this is due to the waist of a cow not going into the soil from where they're suppose to eat. In nature, herds of cows move from lot to lot using their waist to fertilize the ground. This now doesn't happen. Companies keep their cows in buildings (creating huge animal cruelty issues) and grow soy to feed the cows which in itself is causing massive land clearing and other issues. It's been PROVEN that letting cows be cows can not only renew our soil for growing food, but to turn barren land into fertile land.
    Companies are creating the animal cruelty and land destruction. Not us. Remember, America use to be covered with Bison. They're not the issue.

    • @bartsky1945
      @bartsky1945 ปีที่แล้ว

      If it wasn't for artifical fertilizers there wouldn't be enough crops to feed cows, and no amount of waste they produce can compensate for that. We were already heading towards global starvation before they were created. I guess everybody can be a vegan until they are so starved that can eat their children.

    • @abdulmominpanhwar6475
      @abdulmominpanhwar6475 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Waste.

    • @muhammadghazy8
      @muhammadghazy8 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What about the methane emissions genius?

    • @williamwestmill6915
      @williamwestmill6915 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Who do companies get their funding from, aside from subsidies?

  • @elessar5848
    @elessar5848 ปีที่แล้ว +51

    This is the future. I will step over to this in a heartbeat

    • @datacipher
      @datacipher 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Sadly it’s actually totally impractical to do at scale - and may be more polluting. Deceptive and misleading video and narrative.

    • @laurelkramm5400
      @laurelkramm5400 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Incorrect!

    • @americatheblind5820
      @americatheblind5820 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Yeah, that doesn't surprise me. You lemmings will do whatever you're told. Covid mandates?...sure, booster shots? NP. Get a clue.

    • @Legitfya101
      @Legitfya101 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@datacipher They literally said it took 3 weeks vs 3 months for a chicken etc already ahead of the game, and tech is only getting more advanced

  • @larsbressers1402
    @larsbressers1402 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    "Cultured meat is not a meat substitute if you're vegan, vegetarian, or are avoiding meat for religious reasons" - Why would you say that and pose it as a fact? Israel's head Rabbi has said cultured meat is Kosher. Animal harm is taken out of the equation and environmental harm basically down to the point of growing plants
    Otherwise great video :)

    • @imsomcfly22boiii20
      @imsomcfly22boiii20 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yeah, I also found it strange to throw in a blanket statement like that

    • @luizbattistel155
      @luizbattistel155 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The reason she said that is because lab grown meat cells are fed with cow fetus blood (literally). I also found it strange that she wouldn’t mention this small “detail” in the video. The calfs are obtained from pregnant milk cows when they are slaughtered. However, I’ve seen a video of a Singaporean researcher who was able to create an alternative, plant based nutrient solution. So I guess this isn’t really going to be a problem.

    • @larsbressers1402
      @larsbressers1402 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@luizbattistel155 Yes all the larger cultured meat companies now have an animal free serum

    • @SaturnineXTS
      @SaturnineXTS ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well, ideologically motivated vegans have had to convince themselves for a long time that eating meat is "eating corpses" basically, so they may have conditioned themselves into an aversion towards any form of meat. But let's be optimistic and hope they can break that conditioning, just as they always wanted us omnivores to break ours.

    • @TooMuchRecoil
      @TooMuchRecoil ปีที่แล้ว

      Does Israel take into regard Islamic beliefs? or Hindu? why only focus on Judaism? Don't think many Muslim Imam's will say its halal

  • @vincem4756
    @vincem4756 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    As long as theres real studies about the effects on humans and its shown to be a safer superior alternative then yes this is exciting. And I have no doubt it will be proven safe and it will equate to more healthy meals produced with significantly less pollution and no suffering of any animal. We need this

    • @KP-xi4bj
      @KP-xi4bj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So, what happens to animals that are no longer being slaughtered?

    • @vincem4756
      @vincem4756 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@KP-xi4bj adoption? Sent to live out their lives on farms? Use your imagination?

    • @KP-xi4bj
      @KP-xi4bj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@vincem4756So, why would farms exist if you can get your meats from labs?

    • @vincem4756
      @vincem4756 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@KP-xi4bj at that point traditional farms wouldn't be needed, they'd either be much smaller or cease to exist. The farms I'm speaking of would be like sanctuaries not meant for slaughter

    • @KP-xi4bj
      @KP-xi4bj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@vincem4756But that's my point. Farms exist to raise animals to sell to slaughter houses for money. Why would farms raise animals that are no longer sold to be slaughtered? Where would the money come from to raise these animals in such "sanctuaries"? So now, these "sanctuary" farms become charities?? You're not making any sense.

  • @rafspitfire
    @rafspitfire ปีที่แล้ว +40

    Cultured meat for the poor and the normal cows for the rich sounds like a sci-fi movie

    • @powerfultoa7
      @powerfultoa7 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Soylent Green

    • @Vaeldarg
      @Vaeldarg ปีที่แล้ว

      Certainly not like today, where poorer areas have meat available less often than wealthier areas (except fish, anyway).....It's not like there's been large problems with rainforest being clear-cut to make room for cattle ranching, or large-scale piracy over fishing in certain areas that a certain large Asian country sends their "maritime militia" to steal from....

    • @jlee4039
      @jlee4039 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      It’ll probably be the opposite for a while. Only the rich will be able to afford lab-grown meat.

    • @Gaudine
      @Gaudine ปีที่แล้ว

      It’s an April fools joke this video

    • @salsa564
      @salsa564 ปีที่แล้ว

      You’re smart lol

  • @kevinfrancis2244
    @kevinfrancis2244 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    1:37 this guys lived up to his name

    • @josgeerink1350
      @josgeerink1350 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What was his name?

  • @bigupyoski
    @bigupyoski 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The questions that should have been addressed, 'on an anatomical & cellular level, is it exactly the same as beef/chicken.. i.e. exactly the same nutrient density, minerals, vitamins etc...? & if not, what has been added or removed during the development process?'.
    Beef is arguably one of the most perfect foods a human can eat. So if they are able to exactly replicate to that extent, there really becomes little reason to continue to slaughter animals. Provided they can produce the product on mass, & at reasonable price point.

    • @chrishowald494
      @chrishowald494 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Exactly.
      This looks really cool and could revolutionize food on a global scale...BUT....and really...BUUUUUUUT
      What are the growth hormones being used and what are the impacts of those on humans after consumption?
      Though these are called "real meat" the taste and texture may be accurate, but what about the protein and amino acids etc. at the cellular level?
      USDA and FDA approval mean absolutely jack squat. Look at what is currently approved for food, and has been in the past. And are they free from any agenda in their approval processes.
      I am really excited about the possibilities, but with such a drastic process and the widespread implications, the only way I would trust it is with full process transparency and independent reviews.

  • @WarlordMoA
    @WarlordMoA ปีที่แล้ว +18

    3D printed scrambled eggs next?

    • @Gaudine
      @Gaudine ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Chef is really trying to push this whole lab grown meat is good propaganda

    • @williamwestmill6915
      @williamwestmill6915 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      "You don't understand, animal suffering is essential to me"

    • @Quilalatrice
      @Quilalatrice 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Like on upload

  • @muhammadnurakbar4188
    @muhammadnurakbar4188 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    "Where's the steak ???"
    "Sorry the printer stop working"

    • @konjfful2963
      @konjfful2963 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      lmao thats great

  • @bartsky1945
    @bartsky1945 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Sure, why not. But where do we get collagen from, hides for leather products, etc? We do use whole animal normally and there's various different purposes.

    • @Watch-0w1
      @Watch-0w1 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Synthetic leather

    • @bartsky1945
      @bartsky1945 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@Watch-0w1 production of synthetic leather is way more toxic to the environment than natural leather, WAY MORE

    • @discordanzkss8learnmoreoft847
      @discordanzkss8learnmoreoft847 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bartsky1945fruit leather

    • @planet2
      @planet2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@bartsky1945 We're inching towards making things better. synthetic leather production will become less toxic in upcoming years.

    • @miromoves2472
      @miromoves2472 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      ​@@bartsky1945 with technology like this, you would probably be able to print leather etc too if you want to.

  • @JenRelax
    @JenRelax 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Yes! Please come to supermarkets in N.Ireland ASAP.

  • @hakarumonoka
    @hakarumonoka 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

    I wish I could be born 20 years from now to see how far this has progressed and to potentially be able to eat these products.

    • @vincem4756
      @vincem4756 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I think it's coming sooner than we think. Try 5-8 years. And perfected in under 10-15. Technology is really progressing and I think we're going to be surprised by what's coming out

  • @badongo328
    @badongo328 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This, hydrogen fusion, and ionic thrust engines are the future

  • @Jehayland
    @Jehayland 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I’m a big fan real/homemade bone broth, so if cultivated meat does catch on, hopefully it doesn’t entirely crowd out real animals (at least until someone can factory print the bones as well).
    I also wonder what the solution is for organ meats like liver and so on. Are those going to be profitable enough to lab print as well or will it just be muscle meat. (And will the chicken only be white meat or can they do dark meat also? so many questions, lol)

  • @e.v.k.3632
    @e.v.k.3632 ปีที่แล้ว +38

    Impressive how far they have come in Production Improvements

    • @datacipher
      @datacipher 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Sadly it’s actually totally impractical to do at scale - and may be more polluting. Deceptive and misleading video and narrative.

    • @cleangreen2210
      @cleangreen2210 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It all seems to be a hype machine behind a bunch of smoke and mirrors.

    • @dmitryshusterman9494
      @dmitryshusterman9494 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@datacipherexactly what I was about to say

  • @utsavman47
    @utsavman47 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I think printed steaks are ethically vegan. There is basically no suffering to any animal.

    • @SaturnineXTS
      @SaturnineXTS ปีที่แล้ว

      Well neither is there to a hen laying eggs, but vegans think that's bad too. So wouldn't be surprised if some still refused to eat it on principle "because you had to obtain that first animal cell somehow". Same goes for conservatives, some will refuse it because to them if it ain't natural, it ain't the real deal. Human thinking can be really frustrating sometimes

    • @jacksprings7229
      @jacksprings7229 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@SaturnineXTS it’s not all about suffering. Hens live through terrible conditions, and the eggs aren’t laid for our eating so we shouldn’t be stealing them to eat.
      No matter what the case, lab meat is a million times better than meat, and not only does it cause no suffering, it’s taking a cell the hen put no effort into over an egg.
      Just figured I’d tell you since you made it seem like you weren’t vegan while making a statement about vegans.

    • @SaturnineXTS
      @SaturnineXTS ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jacksprings7229 Not all vegans agree on everything, there are always gonna be the even more whacked out than usual ones

    • @williamwestmill6915
      @williamwestmill6915 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@SaturnineXTSThere is suffering with egg-laying hens, as there is with dairy cows. First of all, chickens are not supposed to lay 250 eggs per year. Humans have increased the amount of eggs they lay over 30 times. Because of this, they live significantly less than their predecessors and they suffer all kinds of health complications. Plus, the majority of egg-laying hens are housed in cages where they have very little space to move. Even those hens, that don't live in cages, live in overly crowded huge henhouses. In addition to that, when the egg-laying hens are spent, they get sent to the slaughter just like broilers.

    • @SaturnineXTS
      @SaturnineXTS 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@williamwestmill6915 Ok, but then you'd literally have to kill them all for them not to suffer

  • @hattietarrer650
    @hattietarrer650 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    How is this safe and healthy for humans in the long term?

    • @SlayerEddyTV
      @SlayerEddyTV ปีที่แล้ว +21

      It's just a safe as eating conventionally farmed meat because it is just cells of protein using precision fermentation, and if you eat cheese then you probably already eat products using the technology, it is just being extended for milk and meat products. So those that don't always have the option of becoming a vegan.

    • @Mentegakaya
      @Mentegakaya ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@SlayerEddyTV nope... it cultured from immortal cell line and stem cell that will give you disease... how we so naive when come to synthetic food

  • @damark1972
    @damark1972 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Didn't mention if it's good for a human funnily enough...just environment, wallet and animal positives but what about our health ?

  • @marccracchiolo4935
    @marccracchiolo4935 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    This is great wish I could try that steak right now. This is where government funding to speed up the process would help. And factory farms and cattle ranchers no reason why they can’t switch to this and get a nice piece of the action. This could be a win win.

  • @brandonsheffield9873
    @brandonsheffield9873 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Now we will start to see food wars. I will be on the side of real food.

  • @mujdawood7892
    @mujdawood7892 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What would you do if you have a power blackout , you would starve.

  • @decide2think
    @decide2think ปีที่แล้ว +7

    This all looks interesting, and will likely be a bigger part of the future in some way (like for people who want meat, but without harming/harvesting actual animals). But a serious question here not addressed...
    Q: *What, say, will be the cost per pound?... (Affordability?)
    No doubt the lab produced meat currently is relatively quite expensive while still being in developement (so what $/lb is it?)... but maybe forecasted to later be (less) $/lb in so many years in the future, just like most other products being mass produced.

    • @graemejohnson9025
      @graemejohnson9025 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is BS, The Methane from cow farts, dissapates within 10 Days.. Proven by CSIRO Australia.. And? If cows diddent convert grass into fertilizer? You wouldn't have your Organic Vegan Food.. Just like Vegan leather, your Fertilizer would be Chemicals..

    • @miromoves2472
      @miromoves2472 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Considering how much less it uses resources, once its scaled it will be much more affordable than traditional meat most likely.

    • @graemejohnson9025
      @graemejohnson9025 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@miromoves2472 building the factory, mining the resources to build the equipment, transportation manufacturing, installation and the power required to run it. It's a con.. you just plonk a cow in a paddack , let it eat grass and produce Organic Vegan food fertilizer.. it's a con. Oh the equipment will need maintenance... I cow needs grass and water..

  • @regularSenseAppeal
    @regularSenseAppeal 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Once production cost drops sufficiently (it always does) this will totally disrupt food industry. Promising prospects for hungry mouths and the climate.

  • @vacooke
    @vacooke 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Wish this was available now.

  • @Lucky_9705
    @Lucky_9705 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    If this means that meat can be cheap and sustainable, and still taste good, then I’m all for it

    • @guardsmenedwin6213
      @guardsmenedwin6213 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Quite the opposite, it’ll be way way more expensive, especially early on, later, decades from now, it may get cheaper, but for now, it’ll be wagu prices at choice quality.

  • @poluticon
    @poluticon ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Yeah, no thanks.

    • @salsa564
      @salsa564 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why?

    • @poluticon
      @poluticon ปีที่แล้ว

      @@salsa564 I won't eat any meat that hasn't been slaughtered.

    • @imamalox
      @imamalox ปีที่แล้ว

      @@poluticon Why not?

    • @poluticon
      @poluticon ปีที่แล้ว

      @@imamalox because I won't

    • @imamalox
      @imamalox ปีที่แล้ว

      @@poluticon What a mature and well formulated response. Good argumentation

  • @Crazyman1212
    @Crazyman1212 12 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Though the environmental factors are great. The biggest benefit is that this can be placed anywhere in the world. This would help so many remote communities that struggle with high costs of importing food. The volumes of wasted meats every year would be eliminated. We could cultivate these cells from the worlds best meat stocks. Eating meat free from antibiotics and steroids. Fish cells that do not contain traces of mercury or microplastics.

  • @43DW
    @43DW ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I’m good

  • @TLM860
    @TLM860 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I can already print steaks from my HP printer

  • @drRunp
    @drRunp ปีที่แล้ว +11

    I will not live in the pod, I will not eat the bugs, I will not drink the cockroach milk and I will NOT eat the printed meat

    • @paulprescod6150
      @paulprescod6150 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Fear the future! Give up your laptop and cell phone too!

    • @sarrormiki3363
      @sarrormiki3363 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      🤡

    • @imamalox
      @imamalox ปีที่แล้ว

      @@paulprescod6150 That would definitely make the world a better place. Wouldn't have to read this dumb take again lmao.

  • @jimperry4108
    @jimperry4108 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Sounds excellent. Really like Impossible and Beyond but this is the next level. Can't wait to try it!

  • @SuspendedLogic
    @SuspendedLogic ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I've been buying Tyson stock every paycheck since they bought Upside.

    • @TommyBBQBessinger
      @TommyBBQBessinger ปีที่แล้ว

      Which Tyson stock would you suggest? There seems to be so many of the Tyson stocks. Thanks!

  • @CraigMcDonald1234
    @CraigMcDonald1234 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    cannibals will delight in printing human steaks.

  • @momosbreath9713
    @momosbreath9713 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The End game is to culture a beef meat that tastes like a Kobe beef.

  • @Acuarioshd
    @Acuarioshd ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I buy 170.000 stock of steak holder foods . Stkh

  • @geniuspharmacist
    @geniuspharmacist ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can't believe they named the company "sci-fi meat"....

  • @keon3155
    @keon3155 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    So how can we use this to replace a human arm or leg?

    • @e.v.k.3632
      @e.v.k.3632 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      That's more complicated

    • @dianas8914
      @dianas8914 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Apparently the US military regrew a hand for a soldier that had returned from battle. I watched this years ago (on 60 Minutes I think?) and thought it was a joke.

    • @palmettoblend24
      @palmettoblend24 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      We need stem cells for that.

    • @sebnanchaster
      @sebnanchaster ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The basic 3d printing technology is the same, it's likely why this type of research is taking off since 3d printing cells is now very important

    • @imamalox
      @imamalox ปีที่แล้ว

      It's like asking a kid to draw a detailed map of the entire Pentagon just because they can draw a picture of a dog lol.

  • @Fanimik
    @Fanimik ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Free cruelty meat is great fantastic fabulous I’d

  • @canesplant-basedculinaryla9479
    @canesplant-basedculinaryla9479 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maillard reaction involves amino acids, whereas caramelization is the pyrolysis of certain sugars.

  • @jasonichigo306
    @jasonichigo306 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    They should run this through clinical trials first. Can they control mutation of stem cells. What is the result of consuming mutated cells. All need to be answered

  • @laundryman9311
    @laundryman9311 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Listening to this in headphones was painful.. never heard this amount of moisture when somone talks in my life 😂

  • @millanminter
    @millanminter ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Make a steak get Guga foods to review

  • @alfianfahmi5430
    @alfianfahmi5430 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't think you can call a high-tech, below-average efficiency industrial plant that can only provide a small fragment of beef production (compared to conventional farm-raised cows) an environmentally friendly industrial plant yet 🗿🗿🗿

  • @greevar
    @greevar ปีที่แล้ว +5

    This isn't going to solve the problem. The problem isn't so much in beef production. It's that we do it in the most inefficient way possible. We keep growing all of our foods separately from each other. Mixing crops and allowing ruminants to graze and fertilize those crops would be far more efficient. It would use less land and keep the land we do use fertile. Letting the cattle drop their manure in the field where they graze and grow our crops on that same land would put that methane into food rather than the atmosphere. Every scrap of land is single use in modern agriculture. We have to artificially add more nitrogen to the soil because growing the same crop over and over again depletes the soil. Mixed use agricultural land would help prevent that.

    • @TooMuchRecoil
      @TooMuchRecoil ปีที่แล้ว

      capitalism is the reason why that isn't possible. land owned private farms will never want to work together unless their profits increase.

  • @djjjjj
    @djjjjj ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would love for this technology to progress to the point where we dont need to mass farm, or farm animals at all, but unfortunately that will hurt farmers. There needs to be a happy medium that considers animal welfare and sustainability, as well as Farmers livlihoods.

  • @MrFcob
    @MrFcob 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah like doctors said smoking is safe. ?
    Btw the issue is the plastics in the filters not the tobacco
    But they can take this meat and stick it.

  • @judge724
    @judge724 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Sickening!! You can have it! I'll eat squirrel meat before I eat that vomit!

    • @imamalox
      @imamalox ปีที่แล้ว

      Care to explain what's so sickening about this compared to butchering animals? I eat meat btw, just curious about your reasoning.

    • @JamesCouch777
      @JamesCouch777 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Squirrel is delicious 😋

    • @imamalox
      @imamalox 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @comancheVanwormer If your god is real, they also created humans and therefore indirectly this lab grown meat :)
      Edit: Also, I'd expect a butcher more than anyone to be willing to try a new kind of meat, but I digress.

  • @MrGriff305
    @MrGriff305 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    This will be amazing. Hope it gets mainstream soon.

    • @datacipher
      @datacipher 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s actually totally impractical - another deceptive video and narrative. Won’t happens anytime soon.

    • @MrGriff305
      @MrGriff305 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@datacipher Smartphones were impractical in the 1990s. Compared to keeping actual animals alive and slaughtering them, this absolutely has the potential to get cheaper than livestock.

    • @cleangreen2210
      @cleangreen2210 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@MrGriff305 But phones weren't destroying the planet and torturing animals. Meat is.

  • @greg-eh4de
    @greg-eh4de 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I wonder how long after she ate that did she start having side-effects

  • @JuanRReyes-uy9ri
    @JuanRReyes-uy9ri ปีที่แล้ว +4

    All cool in terms of technology and sustainability. It all boils down to cost effectiveness. Affordable = adoption

    • @awsome14619
      @awsome14619 ปีที่แล้ว

      Once it is studied more, it will be more cost effective. Raising a cow to adulthood for 1 steak is pretty expensive.

    • @datacipher
      @datacipher 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@awsome14619 Sadly it’s actually totally impractical to do at scale - and may be more polluting. Deceptive and misleading video and narrative.

    • @awsome14619
      @awsome14619 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@datacipher Not necessarily. Big meat is currently pushing propaganda that says cultivated meat will cause more pollution but that is simply not true. It is the same cost to produce ibuprofen and we do that on a mass scale. It is x1000 better for the environment than raising cattle to adulthood.

  • @rossysossy
    @rossysossy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Fact she said a lab growing meat saves electricity vs raising cattle or chickens.. I'm not sure that requires any electricity at all

  • @danmar007
    @danmar007 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    It's probably the future of food for 500M of you.

    • @imamalox
      @imamalox ปีที่แล้ว +1

      1/16th of the earth is already quite good! Would significantly reduce greenhouse emissions.

  • @zunedog31
    @zunedog31 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    "Ideal marbling"

  • @christianeduardo2196
    @christianeduardo2196 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I love this😃 this is amazing❤

    • @monkeypox3147
      @monkeypox3147 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      OK Sheep 😂

    • @Rationality4Life
      @Rationality4Life ปีที่แล้ว +4

      ​@@monkeypox3147Sheep? What reason do you have to be against it? It reduced the environmental impact and the suffering of animals while being real meat with the same taste and texture.

    • @sarrormiki3363
      @sarrormiki3363 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@monkeypox3147 🤡

    • @edenc5967
      @edenc5967 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@monkeypox3147lemme guess you’re a farmer who’s gonna lose his whole business 😹😹😹😹 L bozo. Capitalism on top 💪💪💪The market owns you boy

    • @Robert.Smith6969
      @Robert.Smith6969 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@edenc5967 who do you think produces the vegetables that you eat? absolute DWANKIE

  • @davekent20
    @davekent20 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No thanks

  • @ray_boi5953
    @ray_boi5953 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    This is neat and all,
    But what’s gonna happen to the animals once this starts snowballing? 😅
    Are we just gonna be kept as pets or just they all just be killed or what????
    Im very and generally curious about this-
    (i just feel like were cutting whatever-threads we still have with our ancestors, like this feels.. wrong but its good for the environment! So.. Im just confused tbh 😓)

    • @brendanauri
      @brendanauri ปีที่แล้ว +9

      The remaining animals will continue to live out their lives the way they would have. Real meat will probably be considered a luxury. We’ll still have them but on a much smaller scale, hopefully.
      Our ancestors did not mass produce animals for slaughter.

    • @palmettoblend24
      @palmettoblend24 ปีที่แล้ว

      The remaining animals will probaly be killed like usual and sold at a discount price as traditonal meat production methods become uncompetive. It is the same as any product that goes out of production. Small farmers will most likely keep their animals, and there is probaly going to be a push back movement against the technolgy.

    • @keaglebits
      @keaglebits ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Same way a some got jabbed, and some refused

    • @edenc5967
      @edenc5967 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Tradition can stunt the growth and survival of a nation. Sometimes tradition needs to be abandoned at a mass scale like cow farming. We could always have those small farms that operate on their own to supply some cows or whatever. But this is better in every way, for everybody.

  • @CurtisCT
    @CurtisCT 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    A hundred years from now people will look back with disgust at how we used to raise and slaughter animals for food.

  • @simonkraemer3725
    @simonkraemer3725 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I‘m very excited for this because then millions of people could switch to a diet that isn’t cruel to animals

    • @diamondcentraltechnology971
      @diamondcentraltechnology971 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I know right, but its cruel to you. i gues eating over-grown Cancer Cell is not Cruel.

  • @twizerejulienne2731
    @twizerejulienne2731 ปีที่แล้ว

    less water ,less times , no slaughering ,no methane BUT SUPER EXPENSIVE

    • @sebnanchaster
      @sebnanchaster ปีที่แล้ว +3

      economics will come into control and mass production will reduce costs substantially

  • @jiffyjefferson
    @jiffyjefferson 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    it definitely contains more chicken cells by volume than, say, a chicken nugget

  • @iamnotyou588
    @iamnotyou588 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Absolutely amazing!!!

  • @NK-iw6rq
    @NK-iw6rq ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I want to try it , I feel guilty when eating animals

  • @joshuaryantrucking7396
    @joshuaryantrucking7396 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They just approved it to sell at supermarkets

  • @Adrian-pd9xd
    @Adrian-pd9xd 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Only worth my time if just as nutrient dense, healthy, and affordable/sustainable. Come back then.

  • @1699stu
    @1699stu ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Wait for the side effects

    • @imamalox
      @imamalox ปีที่แล้ว

      Like uhh... Greenhouse gas emission reductions? Less animal cruelty?

    • @1699stu
      @1699stu 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@imamalox here is a can of blue hairspray. Go and get yourself ready for the next extinction rebellion event hahaha

    • @imamalox
      @imamalox 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@1699stu Generalisation much lmao, I'm pretty center-leaning believe it or not, and hate climate protesters just as much as the next guy. I was just curious what side effects you expect this to bring.

    • @imamalox
      @imamalox 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @comancheVanwormer Would be surprised if any of that turns out to be true, seeing as this lab grown stuff is chemically pretty much the same and contains the same proteins as regular meat.

    • @1699stu
      @1699stu 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@imamalox have a look at how man messing with the natural composition of food has gone. We think we understand the process so well there will be no unintended consequences but their rarely isn't.

  • @hectormelendez4891
    @hectormelendez4891 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Forget politics, if its cheap, good, and steady, Id go for it. Maybe I can eat that beef/pork hybrid steak from "The Fly".

  • @ArmanIRL
    @ArmanIRL ปีที่แล้ว +29

    I went vegetarian 3 years ago. My primary reason was because of how much I love animals and dispise modern farming practices. I'd give this a try in a heartbeat.

    • @ArmanIRL
      @ArmanIRL ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @ContrarianElite imagine gloating about something like that. Pathetic.

    • @ArmanIRL
      @ArmanIRL ปีที่แล้ว

      @ContrarianElite Speaks volumes to the kind of person you are. I pity you.

    • @sarrormiki3363
      @sarrormiki3363 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @ContrarianElite 🤡

    • @KA-vs7nl
      @KA-vs7nl ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@ArmanIRLi love eating animals. Real, once living animals. Yum!

    • @gameridiotNOT
      @gameridiotNOT ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Its funny how people with zero empathy are bullying someone for having it.
      That aside, this is what I was interested in: How many vegetarians would eat meat again if it was lab grown.

  • @manaylor
    @manaylor ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think this food is a better option for vegans. There are many animals accidentally and deliberately killed when cultivating plant foods.

    • @eru7774
      @eru7774 ปีที่แล้ว

      Veganism isnt cruelty free.. far from it... a lot of Vegan foods are grown in other countries that employ child workers, have terrible working conditions, dangerous working conditions, exploitation, harm to the environment etc....
      But hey, to each their own. You wanna be vegan? Cool. You wanna eat meat? Cool.

  • @r.m8146
    @r.m8146 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Awesome!!!!!

  • @Victoria-zt7zy
    @Victoria-zt7zy 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Just waiting!

  • @Asdgbbm
    @Asdgbbm ปีที่แล้ว +1

    We should beter transform our caotic cities covering all lands for better planed and leave lands to animals for natural cultivation

  • @ayeyebrazorf7527
    @ayeyebrazorf7527 ปีที่แล้ว +29

    the comment section is a great reminder that science education has failed our generation. Complete lack of the most basica understanding of biology of chemistry is what is an insult to human intelligence.

    • @bluecafe509
      @bluecafe509 ปีที่แล้ว

      ... More cultured meat for YOU to enjoy. Nobody else wants it.

    • @mmayn94xm33
      @mmayn94xm33 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      It’s incredible that they were able to achieve this but don’t act like people don’t have the right to question it especially when one of their main reasons to do this is to lower carbon emissions which is bs. We all know who the biggest carbon emitters are.

    • @brendanauri
      @brendanauri ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@mmayn94xm33 this will factually lower carbon emissions. It also requires less resources such as water and land.

    • @mmayn94xm33
      @mmayn94xm33 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@brendanauri it would lower them but not enough to make any significant impact. And yes agree saving resources it’s great but what happens to all of those farmers out there when one company monopolizes the entire “cultured meat industry”. Not to mention the countries that solely rely on agriculture as their main export.

    • @RasakBlood
      @RasakBlood ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mmayn94xm33 Same thing that happened to farmers before them. They changed jobs or adapted.

  • @los447
    @los447 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nope.

  • @mayapun5181
    @mayapun5181 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Upside food Indian ceo not gonna eat

  • @smileygladhands
    @smileygladhands ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Soylent Green

  • @veli1495
    @veli1495 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'll count to 10 before I try... It looks like a composition of chemical nutrients in addition to the protein source... It's as natural as chips maybe, big question regarding its digestibility and health consequences.

    • @danmar007
      @danmar007 ปีที่แล้ว

      I can't believe the nut cases who think this is great. Absolutely pathetic.

    • @edenc5967
      @edenc5967 ปีที่แล้ว

      Everything is a chemical nutrient lol you think your broccoli or steak aren’t made up of the same atoms used by these companies? You think the cows that are pumped with hormones are as natural as a cow from the 1600s? What do you think is a protein source? Lol

    • @Denis-if4zw
      @Denis-if4zw ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What do you consider as a 'chemical nutrient'? The bioreactors that grow cultured meat simulate the normal environment - this is just growth media.
      In fact I'd be more interested if they could grow cultured meat with additional nutrition sources, like vitamins. Imagine a steak that gives your 5 a day

  • @iit_physix-rj7bt
    @iit_physix-rj7bt 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    So local people starting inhouse production and doing weird experimentations and mismanagement.. may be giving rise to new disease 😂😂

  • @the_ghost_boy
    @the_ghost_boy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wanna try it just once pls

  • @cleangreen2210
    @cleangreen2210 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Yeah three weeks to grow one chicken breast. But the chicken that takes 3 months and has 2 breasts, back, legs, wings, etc. Your hype math is skewed.

  • @LEXIELOOOO
    @LEXIELOOOO 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Um with the chicken pandemic what do you see in store?

  • @user-kj6bb7nd3b
    @user-kj6bb7nd3b ปีที่แล้ว

    End the pain for animals, please please all wonderful companies working on this cut the price for meat so much, so that for nobody it would be worth to put one single animal on chain again

  • @jeffstrains4014
    @jeffstrains4014 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    And they are using a gas stove!

  • @philfox452
    @philfox452 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Today I Learned... 🤯

  • @JavenarchX
    @JavenarchX ปีที่แล้ว +1

    World's smallest burger

    • @sarrormiki3363
      @sarrormiki3363 ปีที่แล้ว

      Spot the Statian level too easy

  • @marymaranan3641
    @marymaranan3641 ปีที่แล้ว

    “cruelty free” yet the lab still needs to do a biopsy too ok the chicken that’s alive… yeah ok

  • @damark1972
    @damark1972 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    You need to ask what tests have been done on if this effects humans or will that get in the way of profit

    • @thomasquick996
      @thomasquick996 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Wht there doing is nuts but not unfathemable. There growing meat from stem cells. Might even bee less disease less contamination. But whts really scary is,who owns our food once its said nd done when all our farmers go out of buisness nd theres no more competion. Nd wht will they do controling our food supply. And eventually the trade of farming nd how to do it will be lost.

  • @user-lr1ty2nr1g
    @user-lr1ty2nr1g 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In no time we're sure to see a disease ridden future...and it's scary...

    • @KP-xi4bj
      @KP-xi4bj 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The sky is falling! The sky is falling! LOL

  • @peacejusticeforall6806
    @peacejusticeforall6806 24 วันที่ผ่านมา

    10 years later we may hear the side effects. I personally will not try it.

  • @tommyboy500
    @tommyboy500 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Soylent green REMEMBER THAT?????

  • @Watch-0w1
    @Watch-0w1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    U know what cheaper?. Human meat !

    • @imamalox
      @imamalox ปีที่แล้ว

      How to solve overpopulation and climate change in one simple step!

  • @kevinlynch2915
    @kevinlynch2915 ปีที่แล้ว

    Saves the planet from climate change, and it's not cruel

  • @monkeypox3147
    @monkeypox3147 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    No

  • @user-yl4ne5bs7j
    @user-yl4ne5bs7j 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    it's not better for the environment, please do your research.

  • @mary_syl
    @mary_syl 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I really hope I can witness cruelty free synthetic meat become mainstream in my lifetime 🙏

  • @olivur_1459
    @olivur_1459 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    At that point I’d just quit eating meat altogether.

    • @imamalox
      @imamalox ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That also helps the cause I guess lol. I'm curious as to why, though.