Hey, I have a 240hz 1440p monitor, Im on the fence about this GPU. Do you think this card is able to hit upwards of 240FPS on competitive titles with the 7800X3D?
@@chunxiang105 Yes i think so. I played as competitive Games Valo, CS2 and Fortnite. In CS and Valo it was easy to hit 240fps, in Fortnite i had around 200 FPS but i have a worse CPU then you and got bottlenecked from it i guess. So you should be easily able to get those high fps with the 7800x3D and the Arc. Only for Comparison i have the 5600x
I am running one in my current system. Excellent card for the price, I have no problems with mine at all, runs everything I've thrown at it without even a hiccup.
Card is stupidly underrated by snobby enthusiasts. Got an A770 in a microcenter deal for a customer and was totally shocked to see how far Intel had come, total game changer. $100 less than 4060, came with 16gb of vram instead of 8 and blew the doors of it in tests at 2k.
@@animalyze7120 Agreed. The intel ARC drivers have been getting better and better with each update. I would buy another ARC GPU but will wait to see what Battle mage improves on when it comes out. Happy Gaming! Peace!
What settings do you use? All I see people saying is 1440p ULTRA or Highest settings. Like, why would you play a game at highest settings for the lowest fps? I’m mainly a console gamer so I’m used to 60 fps, but the difference between 1440p and whatever consoles do with variable resolution is honestly negligible.
I clicked on this because my friend is looking to build a PC and Micro Center has an Intel bundle with board, 32gb ddr4, processor, and the Arc 770 all for $450. Sounds like a good deal
it's gonna be much more than that, their next gen laptop gpu (battlemage in lunar lake laptop) is 50% stronger So 50% minimum better, i would expect it around 75% for the desktop
The 7800XT has set the bar. Intel needs to match it, imo at a lower price. I got a 4080S FE in one computer but I'm done supporting nvidia 😅 So in my collection/builds, I now got 4080S FE, RX 7900 GRE and starting today an A770 👍🏻
@@_TrueDesire_ 7800xt was good but thing is we had 6900 XT for 500$ a long time pre rdna3 launch We need something from the start a good gpu price I believe battlemage flagship will be 400$
@@_TrueDesire_ With all the recent layoffs at Intel I hope their graphics division survived. I bought 2 A770s and an A380 to support competition in the market, competition drives capitalism which drives innovation and progress so I'm all aboard for someone hopping in to shake things up!
A bit of feedback for the vocal recordings: typically, when doing recorded work, you don't want to sit in the lower register of your vocal chords, as it can cause a scraping/scratchy quality to your recording that can make it more difficult to listen to. That is to say, the "normal" speaking voice most people use doesn't record too terribly well, and can also cause vocal strain over long periods. Typically, you want to keep your vocal chords at a more "neutral" mid-tone (it's hard to explain in text, but trust me, if you relax your throat, you'll feel where your vocal chords will 'even out'), which both allows you greater range to pitch down or up depending on what it is you're trying to convey, and also reduce undue stress on your throat. You may not initially like how "high/squeaky" your voice sounds to yourself, because you, like most people, tend to speak from the chest, but it will definitely help tonal clarity and it will 100% save your throat in the long run. Sincerely, Someone who's given themselves laryngitis from choral concerts multiple times.
The Arc graphics drivers have come a long way in unlocking this card's potential for gaming, but I wonder how much more Intel's engineers can squeeze out with driver updates? This might be close to the best we are going to get. Not bad, priced right, but not competitive enough for core gaming. Best suited for folks who like to experiment. Intel has open source drivers for Linux, so it might be great for Linux gaming.
Yeah, I keep seeing the whole “the drivers will improve”, but tbh idk how much more they can squeeze from the cards without a drastic rewrite/rearchitecting of their hardware and drivers. It’s been almost 2 years since these cards, at what point do we sort of “call it” and realize this is what we’ve got. Cards are ridiculously powerful if you know how to program for it, but without specific optimizations on the part of games it probably won’t stand out significantly, which stinks because I like the card a lot…
@@ItsDeeno69 Still long way to go in many cases. Also peforms a bit poorly with a lesser CPU. I have an i5 10400 rig I put the A770 in, then swapped it out for a 3070. The 3070 performed way better. In my 12600k rig, the difference between the two was a lot smaller.
@@ProceuTech wide sweeping gains may not be in the books but they are now focusing on dx12 and vuklan perf improvements/optimizations that may show some sweeping improvements, how large we dont know but i have seen a few niche cases so far where an update targeting other games more then tripled the perf of a game that was already getting over 60fps mins. one thing to remember is they are still very much learning to get the most out of their own design, the next gen wont have hardware scoreboarding(no hardware scheduler) they are going nvidias rout, part of the problems have been them working around the scorboardings flaws and to feed the hardware code in the most efficient way possible as well, Raja was hired go give them a gaming gpu, he gave them a creators gpu, and left the heavy lifting for the driver team, same as he did at amd... i do see some titles even some older ones seeing gains as the drivers mature though... they have taken a systematic approach, now dx9-11 games are on native code not translation layers, 12 and vk are now being focused on more with dx11 and older having some debuggers working on stuff but major focus on getting optimization done on the driver side. from dual 1070 amp extreme cards to this card... i have no real complaints/regrets, Acer Predator Bifrost from Neweggs 2nd batch, its been a fun ride, and the cards already aging better then what it launched against. 3 and 4 series nVidia have multi monitor issues.... low vram, and are effectively a tier down from their previous generations... the 3060 should have been a 3050.etc.. and amd.. well i have loved my amd systems and cards over the years, this has been less painful then the last couple amd gpu setups i have run.. despite its flaws... i still want DSR/VSR in drivers damn it!!!
Honestly, i think the a770 is an often overlooked value package. Decent native 1440 performance that will benefit a lot from fsr (specially fsr3 + fg) in the future helping it to stay relevant especially with its 16gb of vram. Surely not a good option for anyone that doesn´t have a mainboard supporting rebar and maybe still a bit of a gamble for anyone mainly interested in older direct x games. Especially older niche titles are unlikely to be a focus of attention from the driver developers to fix a potential issue (graphic glitches or stuttering). For anyone who only (or at least mainly) plays modern esports titles, modern triple a titles and who also has a modern cpu/mainboard combo the card can be a real value option. Even more so if you get a good deal/discount.
honestly, legacy supports been pretty good, even niche stuff at worst needs dxvk or dgvoodoo2, same things i have had to do on amd and nvidia in the past... sometimes the same games... the wrapper gog uses can work as well... really not problem oh, nglide works great on the card as well ;) came from a 1070 amp extreme push the limit card.. this thing at worst is on par with that, at best more like having 2 of the 1070's in sli with a high ramp oc.. so yeah...
I am planning to build a pc with Arc A770 for freelance video editing. I will mostly use Premiere Pro, After Effects and sometime Blender. Which one will perform better in video editing gunnir or limited edition when LE have more bandwidth (560gbps vs 512gbps) and Gunnir have higher clock speed and better cooling system. I heard LE has heating problem. Is it solved now or does it still have a heating issue? If you tested those cards recently for video editing then let me know which one performs better in real-life video editing.
Bought it in January 2023, and it works just fine in my sons PC. I knew it is a first attempt by Intel, but couldn´t resist to have it in my collection. Hope Battlemage will be more competitive. The current GPU market is just dead.
Got the bifrost a770 16 GB for $279 a month ago and I feel like I "won". Great performance on baldur's gate, Witcher 3, Fallout 4 and Fallout 76. Zero complaints but I will admit that I'm not a big time player, just a few hours a week.
As someone else who doesn't base their life on getting every last FPS from their PC I'm in the same boat. My RTX 3080 machine still cranks better results than my A770 setup but the price difference makes the A770 the clear winner, it's more compatible and capable than people give it credit for, just buy one and play rather than argue on the internet which card can benchmark higher.
Looking at this for a 2nd 1440p computer, ironically the 16gb vram and driver optimisation will probably give it a longevity at future budget level than the fancier alternatives with lower vram
I'm not a gamer. With that said, I would like to experiment with open source LLM's on my own hardware. This card being significantly less than $300.00 with lots of vram makes it an obvious choice for me.
I have an 5600x rx6600 setup. I really wanted to try the a770 just for shits and giggles. Im gonna need a card soon anyways when i build a pc for my kiddo so.... 🤷
I used it for UE5.4 experimentation. Everything ran pretty well on it! If you want the 16GB of memory then it makes sense, but if you are spending around $300, the GPU found in a competeing Nvidia or AMD card (RTX 4060 and RX 6700XT) are more powerful in terms of raw FPS.
@@ProceuTech yes i want it for the vram, i got a 1070 ti so 4060 8gb doesn't really worth the hassle. Need a card with performance of 3070 and 16gb of vram. I'll wait for the new gen though, this gen performane is too inconsistent. Thanks a lot
My rtx 4070 asus proart card idle at 8w and with oc/undervolt 0.95v-2805Mhz Gpu/+1250VRAM in ;oad the power is betwen 130w+(old games like dying light) to 160-180w(modern games +ray tracing). I switched my 6yrs old 1080gtx and im very happy with power/[erformance ratio and price 520euro(I bought used 2 months from someone who want a rtx 480)
Personally I don't really consider 60fps that great outside of the most casual of casual most likely 3rd person games with a controller. Otherwise 90fps minimum or 120 ideally should be the target framerate any worth its salt gpu should aim for in most decently well optimized games medium / high settings at 1440p. I'll only cut them some slack if they can barely get that 90 with their upscaler set to the best quality setting at 1440p. This would mean intel would be looking at something in the ballpark of a 500-600$ a790 type card to get those numbers.
I was worried that PCIe 3.0 would bottleneck the A750/A770- after testing on a Z390 board with an i7-9700k, the only thing that effected performance was whether or not Resizable BAR was turned on (Called "Above 4G Decoding" in the BIOS).
Pretty good improvement in DirectX11 games, but I’m not seeing massive performance improvements in games that were already running pretty well. Gotta hand it to them though!
@@ProceuTechI have the same sparkle OC card and I love it. I paired it with a Ryzen and it runs a tad bit better then an all Intel build. Those fans are loud and I love it when you need it. Overclocking it gave me a 3FPS boost so I’ll just let it do it’s thing on stock for now. I love what Intel has done so far!
I'm curious, does the Intel control panel have a custom color control temperature slider like the AMD Adrenalin software? I'm using an old HDTV for my PC monitor, and it's just way easier to calibrate a cooler or warmer temp on AMD, than it is on Nvidia's control panel. Nvidia's control panel for color calibration sucks.
I strongly believe it is best in it's class, when considering price $270 in US market (EU is similar situation after fees and taxes). The closest AMD competitor is $50 more and nvidia? Get ready $100 more minimum... It's such a shame they're discontinuing A770. Such a great deal and especially when Intel could use a moral boost with general public. They say Intel dGPU sales are on completely down.
Out of curiosity does that card have problems with its fan speeds? There's a common problem with these cards when it comes to ramping up and down frequently due to bad software on intel's end so was wondering if the titan also does this.
@@ProceuTech Thank you very much for your answer, I'm thinking of getting the asrock a770 8gb version next month. According to everything I've seen, it really sounds great. I got an inter-tech argus gps-700 for my new PC. Mostly on sparkle it says recommendation 650, on asrock 700, on the tech power page 550. It's really confusing when you have different information.I even found a comment that someone uses 500w and it works without problems.
hello! hope you are well! should i buy the 3060 12 gb or arc a770 for gaming as both are the same price in my place. and if i add 80 bucks ill get my hand in 306 ti 2x ventus. please advice. thanks
@@rzkrdn8650 You are looking at outdated numbers, as the 6700xt nowadays is about as good as the 3070 and the a770 at launch was on par with the 6600 non-XT, but nowdays is close to the 3070.
@@rattlehead999 nope it's not an outdated number, look it up on youtube, sort by upload date, a benchmark as early as 3 weeks ago confirms my statement. 3070 only stalemate with 6700xt if it is running out of vram (ultra texture/4k). It wins pretty much anything else. And everything else i said is also the same.
Why u gotta try to downplay the performance capabilities of the card? No it’s not an ultra and/or max settings card. It’s half the price and sometimes even less of NVIDIA gpu’s. Foh.
Does anyone have the intel arc a770 that would be willing to test the game dead by daylight from Steam and tell me how it runs as of 07/2024? Preferably when playing at high/ultra preset?? Heard that you might have to go into game properties and add "-DX12" to make it run better, but that info is a year old now, so I'm not sure if that is still true.
Hmmmmm!!! For this 300 dollar price I think I will have me one of these. very good, 1080p is my arena of gaming with that 16gb vram will do me just excellent
Also is a 1050w thermaltake gold certified power supply for my system I figured better to have room if I ever overlooked my system which would barely run hot if built and set up right plus with everything being so tight in the case like a brick parts especially the gpu will not move so no gpu drupping or sagging damaging my card decreasing top end and maybe low end preforms plus lower latency due to shorter input and out signal travel distance by maybe even 40% maybe lasting longer especially since it will be in a sealed room with heavy overkill nasal clean air to prevent anything from going wrong and I'm getting a battery backup surge protector for the ultimate pc protection one filter fan will even blow on the pc for further cooling capacity to let it run at full load 4k like it's 1080 mid tier settings I hope to hear from you soon
What on Earth are talking about? On any monitor 60hz and higher 70ish fps will be butter smooth to the human eye and there will be no stuttering or tearing AT ALL. What is this new age pompous attitude thinking folks can really detect a difference without a horribly inaccurate fps counter app? Seriously at 60fps your in the sweet spot there is nothing slowing you down competitively, otherwise Consoles would have never been popular and totally unplayable by your reasoning. I have a 4090 and another system with older 2070 and 240hz 32" monitor. I have done this test with literally dozens of ppl and with graphics maxed not 1 person could tell me which was which, I mean the guess is 50/50 of course but the point is unless you are Data from Star trek, give it up you aren't going to see anything different. If you think fps numbers impress then you'd be wrong again, unless you can actually see that difference, the Extra $1200 is wasted.
Vastly more expensive gpu out performs much cheaper gpu my mind is blown by this shocking fact next thing your gonna tell me series x is way faster then the cheaper series s 😮😵😵💫🤯
Bought a 2 week old Arc A770 Sparkle for 180€ and im completely happy with it. Using it on 1440P with 0 Problems.
Lucky bastard.
Oh my God I thought I was lucky getting my A750 at 179.99 on sale 😂 mine is brand new tho but 2 weeks old ? Same thing
Hey, I have a 240hz 1440p monitor, Im on the fence about this GPU. Do you think this card is able to hit upwards of 240FPS on competitive titles with the 7800X3D?
@@chunxiang105 Yes i think so. I played as competitive Games Valo, CS2 and Fortnite.
In CS and Valo it was easy to hit 240fps, in Fortnite i had around 200 FPS but i have a worse CPU then you and got bottlenecked from it i guess. So you should be easily able to get those high fps with the 7800x3D and the Arc. Only for Comparison i have the 5600x
Just bought mine new for a 280€
I am running one in my current system. Excellent card for the price, I have no problems with mine at all, runs everything I've thrown at it without even a hiccup.
same got it for only 260 a couple months ago and beats all cards in the price range
The Intel A770 is a decent performing GPU. Been happy with the recent driver updates and use it for 1440p gaming. Thanks for the review.
Card is stupidly underrated by snobby enthusiasts. Got an A770 in a microcenter deal for a customer and was totally shocked to see how far Intel had come, total game changer. $100 less than 4060, came with 16gb of vram instead of 8 and blew the doors of it in tests at 2k.
@@animalyze7120 Agreed. The intel ARC drivers have been getting better and better with each update. I would buy another ARC GPU but will wait to see what Battle mage improves on when it comes out. Happy Gaming! Peace!
What settings do you use? All I see people saying is 1440p ULTRA or Highest settings. Like, why would you play a game at highest settings for the lowest fps? I’m mainly a console gamer so I’m used to 60 fps, but the difference between 1440p and whatever consoles do with variable resolution is honestly negligible.
I clicked on this because my friend is looking to build a PC and Micro Center has an Intel bundle with board, 32gb ddr4, processor, and the Arc 770 all for $450. Sounds like a good deal
Definitely a decent build. I saw they’re doing 16gb DDR4 3200 for the same price now and I think I’m gonna grab it up.
All good except their store brand RAM is awful.
get a motherboard that can support DDR5 ram.
@@ht27777 16Gb is not enough for many modern games already.
If Battlemage equivalent of A770 is 20-30% faster than this and keep the current (reduced) pricing. I can honestly see it sells some
it's gonna be much more than that, their next gen laptop gpu (battlemage in lunar lake laptop) is 50% stronger
So 50% minimum better, i would expect it around 75% for the desktop
@@Cake-ql8lh but that's made by tsmc, battlemage is rumored to be made in-house and slightly different node, we don't know
@@rzkrdn8650 it's TSMC 4
The 7800XT has set the bar. Intel needs to match it, imo at a lower price. I got a 4080S FE in one computer but I'm done supporting nvidia 😅
So in my collection/builds, I now got 4080S FE, RX 7900 GRE and starting today an A770 👍🏻
@@_TrueDesire_ 7800xt was good but thing is we had 6900 XT for 500$ a long time pre rdna3 launch
We need something from the start a good gpu price
I believe battlemage flagship will be 400$
Good review. I have had a good run with my A750. I just regret not buying the A770 16g version. :( My only regret.
@@CNC295 well you saved some money for the next generation gpus 😁
@@_TrueDesire_ With all the recent layoffs at Intel I hope their graphics division survived. I bought 2 A770s and an A380 to support competition in the market, competition drives capitalism which drives innovation and progress so I'm all aboard for someone hopping in to shake things up!
A bit of feedback for the vocal recordings: typically, when doing recorded work, you don't want to sit in the lower register of your vocal chords, as it can cause a scraping/scratchy quality to your recording that can make it more difficult to listen to. That is to say, the "normal" speaking voice most people use doesn't record too terribly well, and can also cause vocal strain over long periods. Typically, you want to keep your vocal chords at a more "neutral" mid-tone (it's hard to explain in text, but trust me, if you relax your throat, you'll feel where your vocal chords will 'even out'), which both allows you greater range to pitch down or up depending on what it is you're trying to convey, and also reduce undue stress on your throat. You may not initially like how "high/squeaky" your voice sounds to yourself, because you, like most people, tend to speak from the chest, but it will definitely help tonal clarity and it will 100% save your throat in the long run.
Sincerely,
Someone who's given themselves laryngitis from choral concerts multiple times.
Rarely we find comments with genuine good intentions.. bless you man
Picked an A770 up from a local place for 220 bucks on special offer, quite an upgrade from my 1660 super 😅
The Arc graphics drivers have come a long way in unlocking this card's potential for gaming, but I wonder how much more Intel's engineers can squeeze out with driver updates? This might be close to the best we are going to get. Not bad, priced right, but not competitive enough for core gaming. Best suited for folks who like to experiment. Intel has open source drivers for Linux, so it might be great for Linux gaming.
Yeah, I keep seeing the whole “the drivers will improve”, but tbh idk how much more they can squeeze from the cards without a drastic rewrite/rearchitecting of their hardware and drivers. It’s been almost 2 years since these cards, at what point do we sort of “call it” and realize this is what we’ve got. Cards are ridiculously powerful if you know how to program for it, but without specific optimizations on the part of games it probably won’t stand out significantly, which stinks because I like the card a lot…
@@ProceuTechI think intel said that the hardware is a770 is 3070 level so when ir reaches that it will be done
It may never reach that due to hardware limitations and hardware design. Alchemist struggles with occupancy issues @@ItsDeeno69
@@ItsDeeno69 Still long way to go in many cases. Also peforms a bit poorly with a lesser CPU. I have an i5 10400 rig I put the A770 in, then swapped it out for a 3070. The 3070 performed way better. In my 12600k rig, the difference between the two was a lot smaller.
@@ProceuTech wide sweeping gains may not be in the books but they are now focusing on dx12 and vuklan perf improvements/optimizations that may show some sweeping improvements, how large we dont know but i have seen a few niche cases so far where an update targeting other games more then tripled the perf of a game that was already getting over 60fps mins.
one thing to remember is they are still very much learning to get the most out of their own design, the next gen wont have hardware scoreboarding(no hardware scheduler) they are going nvidias rout, part of the problems have been them working around the scorboardings flaws and to feed the hardware code in the most efficient way possible as well, Raja was hired go give them a gaming gpu, he gave them a creators gpu, and left the heavy lifting for the driver team, same as he did at amd...
i do see some titles even some older ones seeing gains as the drivers mature though... they have taken a systematic approach, now dx9-11 games are on native code not translation layers, 12 and vk are now being focused on more with dx11 and older having some debuggers working on stuff but major focus on getting optimization done on the driver side.
from dual 1070 amp extreme cards to this card... i have no real complaints/regrets, Acer Predator Bifrost from Neweggs 2nd batch, its been a fun ride, and the cards already aging better then what it launched against.
3 and 4 series nVidia have multi monitor issues.... low vram, and are effectively a tier down from their previous generations... the 3060 should have been a 3050.etc..
and amd.. well i have loved my amd systems and cards over the years, this has been less painful then the last couple amd gpu setups i have run.. despite its flaws... i still want DSR/VSR in drivers damn it!!!
Honestly, i think the a770 is an often overlooked value package. Decent native 1440 performance that will benefit a lot from fsr (specially fsr3 + fg) in the future helping it to stay relevant especially with its 16gb of vram.
Surely not a good option for anyone that doesn´t have a mainboard supporting rebar and maybe still a bit of a gamble for anyone mainly interested in older direct x games. Especially older niche titles are unlikely to be a focus of attention from the driver developers to fix a potential issue (graphic glitches or stuttering).
For anyone who only (or at least mainly) plays modern esports titles, modern triple a titles and who also has a modern cpu/mainboard combo the card can be a real value option. Even more so if you get a good deal/discount.
honestly, legacy supports been pretty good, even niche stuff at worst needs dxvk or dgvoodoo2, same things i have had to do on amd and nvidia in the past... sometimes the same games... the wrapper gog uses can work as well...
really not problem oh, nglide works great on the card as well ;)
came from a 1070 amp extreme push the limit card.. this thing at worst is on par with that, at best more like having 2 of the 1070's in sli with a high ramp oc.. so yeah...
This card is THE sweet spot for 1440p gamers with a CPU made in the last ~5 years. Enable rebar and let it rock!
It is a great card. Almost weekly driver updates have helped this card become quite a good 1440p gaming card. 👍👍
I am planning to build a pc with Arc A770 for freelance video editing. I will mostly use Premiere Pro, After Effects and sometime Blender. Which one will perform better in video editing gunnir or limited edition when LE have more bandwidth (560gbps vs 512gbps) and Gunnir have higher clock speed and better cooling system. I heard LE has heating problem. Is it solved now or does it still have a heating issue? If you tested those cards recently for video editing then let me know which one performs better in real-life video editing.
Yeah, I bought an arc just to support the card. Let’s get another name in the game to balance out prices.
Bought it in January 2023, and it works just fine in my sons PC. I knew it is a first attempt by Intel, but couldn´t resist to have it in my collection. Hope Battlemage will be more competitive. The current GPU market is just dead.
Got the bifrost a770 16 GB for $279 a month ago and I feel like I "won". Great performance on baldur's gate, Witcher 3, Fallout 4 and Fallout 76.
Zero complaints but I will admit that I'm not a big time player, just a few hours a week.
As someone else who doesn't base their life on getting every last FPS from their PC I'm in the same boat. My RTX 3080 machine still cranks better results than my A770 setup but the price difference makes the A770 the clear winner, it's more compatible and capable than people give it credit for, just buy one and play rather than argue on the internet which card can benchmark higher.
I'm planning on using it for CAD and modeling, this is Great 👍
Hey bro , do u have any social media, so we can talk about it
Looking at this for a 2nd 1440p computer, ironically the 16gb vram and driver optimisation will probably give it a longevity at future budget level than the fancier alternatives with lower vram
I'm not a gamer. With that said, I would like to experiment with open source LLM's on my own hardware. This card being significantly less than $300.00 with lots of vram makes it an obvious choice for me.
Then this card makes 100% sense, especially with the fp16 compute perf it offers!
Direct benchmark comparisons against similarly prices gpus would have been useful to establish the final question "is it worth buying it in 2024?"
How are u getting 100 fps in rdr2 in 1440p
I only get around 55-70 fps
If intel had the drivers they have now at release, they would not have been able to make these cards fast enough.
Timing is everything.
This card reminds me of when Nvidia released the 1080. They made something ahead of its time and it only gets better with drivers
I have an 5600x rx6600 setup. I really wanted to try the a770 just for shits and giggles. Im gonna need a card soon anyways when i build a pc for my kiddo so.... 🤷
how does it perform in the unreal engine 5?
I'm thinking about buying the next gen intel cards, the 16gb Ram for that price is really appealing.
I used it for UE5.4 experimentation. Everything ran pretty well on it! If you want the 16GB of memory then it makes sense, but if you are spending around $300, the GPU found in a competeing Nvidia or AMD card (RTX 4060 and RX 6700XT) are more powerful in terms of raw FPS.
@@ProceuTech yes i want it for the vram, i got a 1070 ti so 4060 8gb doesn't really worth the hassle. Need a card with performance of 3070 and 16gb of vram. I'll wait for the new gen though, this gen performane is too inconsistent.
Thanks a lot
@@sorousha.s9002 The drivers are good now. The only limiting factor is the architecture.
My rtx 4070 asus proart card idle at 8w and with oc/undervolt 0.95v-2805Mhz Gpu/+1250VRAM in ;oad the power is betwen 130w+(old games like dying light) to 160-180w(modern games +ray tracing). I switched my 6yrs old 1080gtx and im very happy with power/[erformance ratio and price 520euro(I bought used 2 months from someone who want a rtx 480)
Personally I don't really consider 60fps that great outside of the most casual of casual most likely 3rd person games with a controller. Otherwise 90fps minimum or 120 ideally should be the target framerate any worth its salt gpu should aim for in most decently well optimized games medium / high settings at 1440p. I'll only cut them some slack if they can barely get that 90 with their upscaler set to the best quality setting at 1440p. This would mean intel would be looking at something in the ballpark of a 500-600$ a790 type card to get those numbers.
Well, I'm building my PC with 12600k with DDR5 and I want a graphics card that will age well. Can you recommend one?
3070 would pair beautifully
@@ProceuTech
22 / 5.000
Resultados de traducción
Resultado de traducción
and what about the arc 770?
im wondering about upgrading my old 1060 6gb, boardl imited to 3.0 16x PCIE 3060, 3060 Ti, arc a 580/750
I was worried that PCIe 3.0 would bottleneck the A750/A770- after testing on a Z390 board with an i7-9700k, the only thing that effected performance was whether or not Resizable BAR was turned on (Called "Above 4G Decoding" in the BIOS).
my rig is OLD ryzen 5 1600k and a 1060 6 gig
ill just grab this and stretch my cpu till i get enough to upgrade everything else
Just make sure your MoBo runs ReBar. Is it PCIE 4?
How are you guys liking those new drivers? Thing is a BEAST
Pretty good improvement in DirectX11 games, but I’m not seeing massive performance improvements in games that were already running pretty well. Gotta hand it to them though!
@@ProceuTechI have the same sparkle OC card and I love it. I paired it with a Ryzen and it runs a tad bit better then an all Intel build. Those fans are loud and I love it when you need it. Overclocking it gave me a 3FPS boost so I’ll just let it do it’s thing on stock for now. I love what Intel has done so far!
Seen a pretty decent pretty built a770 genuinely thinking about it.
A 16gb card for under $300 is a pretty good deal and you know next gen games will be using 12gb or more of vram.
I'm curious, does the Intel control panel have a custom color control temperature slider like the AMD Adrenalin software? I'm using an old HDTV for my PC monitor, and it's just way easier to calibrate a cooler or warmer temp on AMD, than it is on Nvidia's control panel. Nvidia's control panel for color calibration sucks.
It does, but it’s kind of limited. If you joined the discord I could sent screen shots of it
Pico allows you to use it in vr. I gave up on my Nvidia 4060ti
I strongly believe it is best in it's class, when considering price $270 in US market (EU is similar situation after fees and taxes). The closest AMD competitor is $50 more and nvidia? Get ready $100 more minimum...
It's such a shame they're discontinuing A770. Such a great deal and especially when Intel could use a moral boost with general public. They say Intel dGPU sales are on completely down.
Out of curiosity does that card have problems with its fan speeds? There's a common problem with these cards when it comes to ramping up and down frequently due to bad software on intel's end so was wondering if the titan also does this.
I’ve never had a problem with the speeds on the fans. I also have it set to a custom curve, so they are always on to keep the cards ambient temps down
I have also never had a problem
@@GrandeAdventure Interesting. From the post I've seen it looks like this might be a problem with the a750 series.
I’m planning on getting one in a month or so, but I have a 10700 non K so we shall see how it goes lol!
10700 is a good pair up with an A770.
My only issue with A770 is that I can’t set up 120hz refresh rate in windows.
why i can
@@JayzBeerz it might got something to do with hdmi cable that works perfectly with 3090. I will try display port.
@@Ornal64 have you gone into advance display in windows?
@@JayzBeerz yes, it will just revert back to 60hz. Same hdmi cable with Radeon and Nvidia works without problem.
@@Ornal64use display port instead of HDMI, maybe it will help
Intel cards can be tricky sometimes
What are the minimum PSU requirements for the a770. Somewhere it says 550w, somewhere 650.
I never had any issues with a 550W when using something like an i5-13600k!
@@ProceuTech Thank you very much for your answer, I'm thinking of getting the asrock a770 8gb version next month. According to everything I've seen, it really sounds great. I got an inter-tech argus gps-700 for my new PC. Mostly on sparkle it says recommendation 650, on asrock 700, on the tech power page 550. It's really confusing when you have different information.I even found a comment that someone uses 500w and it works without problems.
hello! hope you are well! should i buy the 3060 12 gb or arc a770 for gaming as both are the same price in my place. and if i add 80 bucks ill get my hand in 306 ti 2x ventus.
please advice. thanks
How does it compare to the rx 6700(XT) and rtx 3070?
6700xt and 3070 are 20% and 35% faster respectively
^^^ can be even wider or closer depending on the title though.
@@rzkrdn8650 You are looking at outdated numbers, as the 6700xt nowadays is about as good as the 3070 and the a770 at launch was on par with the 6600 non-XT, but nowdays is close to the 3070.
@@rattlehead999 nope it's not an outdated number, look it up on youtube, sort by upload date, a benchmark as early as 3 weeks ago confirms my statement. 3070 only stalemate with 6700xt if it is running out of vram (ultra texture/4k). It wins pretty much anything else.
And everything else i said is also the same.
@@ProceuTech everything is
Wait this thing can run 4k?
All my gaming is 4k. Diablo4 80-100 fps
An you do another review of this card latter near Christmas time to see the improvement
What is not budget is the electricity bill to pay after using this that Graphics Card. Power Consumption is way high. 😞
I was looking at getting a 770. Bu then i started having flashback's from the 6 years of lying to myself about how great my Vega 64 was lol
Yeah, the similarities between Vega and this uarch are pretty striking if you know what to look for
Does Recomended if ARC a770 8Gb vs UHD 630 and UHD 750..
why would you show us medium presets? could it be that this card cant handle Ultra?
It's not an Ultra card. It will play Halo Infinite at Medium/High settings in 1440p at 80+ fps.
Why u gotta try to downplay the performance capabilities of the card? No it’s not an ultra and/or max settings card. It’s half the price and sometimes even less of NVIDIA gpu’s. Foh.
Seems the 7600xt is still the better choice, but they are doing a great job with their tech/drivers.
Does anyone have the intel arc a770 that would be willing to test the game dead by daylight from Steam and tell me how it runs as of 07/2024? Preferably when playing at high/ultra preset?? Heard that you might have to go into game properties and add "-DX12" to make it run better, but that info is a year old now, so I'm not sure if that is still true.
Well, playing fortnite on dx12 is a lot more stable than dx11. So, not sure if that tells you anything.
Hmm is that 4K native or 4k wit ai upscaling?
Hmmmmm!!! For this 300 dollar price I think I will have me one of these. very good, 1080p is my arena of gaming with that 16gb vram will do me just excellent
How were the temps with your sparkle model
Very reasonable. Under 40C idling, and roughly 65C under load +/- a few degrees depending on ambient temperatures!
@@ProceuTechThat’s pretty good compared the other models running at 70C and higher.
In Europe they want 350€ for it.
Yeah, makes it kind of a tough sell when it’s encroaching on the 4060ti
Remember the prices you see in USD don't include taxes, it's typically 7-10% more depending on where you live
@ZForZamorak oh it’s way more where I live 😭
Also is a 1050w thermaltake gold certified power supply for my system I figured better to have room if I ever overlooked my system which would barely run hot if built and set up right plus with everything being so tight in the case like a brick parts especially the gpu will not move so no gpu drupping or sagging damaging my card decreasing top end and maybe low end preforms plus lower latency due to shorter input and out signal travel distance by maybe even 40% maybe lasting longer especially since it will be in a sealed room with heavy overkill nasal clean air to prevent anything from going wrong and I'm getting a battery backup surge protector for the ultimate pc protection one filter fan will even blow on the pc for further cooling capacity to let it run at full load 4k like it's 1080 mid tier settings I hope to hear from you soon
What on Earth are talking about? On any monitor 60hz and higher 70ish fps will be butter smooth to the human eye and there will be no stuttering or tearing AT ALL. What is this new age pompous attitude thinking folks can really detect a difference without a horribly inaccurate fps counter app? Seriously at 60fps your in the sweet spot there is nothing slowing you down competitively, otherwise Consoles would have never been popular and totally unplayable by your reasoning. I have a 4090 and another system with older 2070 and 240hz 32" monitor. I have done this test with literally dozens of ppl and with graphics maxed not 1 person could tell me which was which, I mean the guess is 50/50 of course but the point is unless you are Data from Star trek, give it up you aren't going to see anything different. If you think fps numbers impress then you'd be wrong again, unless you can actually see that difference, the Extra $1200 is wasted.
Makes me sick, ddr4 with a 14700k-
That 12ns latency goes crazy
@@ProceuTech OH OK, I take back what I said
😲😲😲😲
Rtx 4070 ti super outpreforms this and is more reliable and stable in games
That card is like 3x the price of this one though
Vastly more expensive gpu out performs much cheaper gpu my mind is blown by this shocking fact next thing your gonna tell me series x is way faster then the cheaper series s 😮😵😵💫🤯
This is good for games that don’t support it