A different beast to Meshtastic, I like the agnostic interface options. Lora SX1280 would be an interesting choice for transport mode, with no duty cycle, license free ISM, providing a higher speed shorter range backbone, with the advantages of CHIRP over standard WiFi modulation, when suitably provisioned. A nice hobby nonetheless.
Brill video. just got in to Meshtastic at christmas and havent managed to pick anything up here, guess nobody has it :( but this is temping to flash my heltec and see if node are around here with this software. seems more advanced that u can send pictures etc. great guide, you make it look easy lol
It might take some exploring. I take mine with me when I go out sometimes and pick up some interesting stuff. I met a guy through meshtastic flying a kite with the node on it. Never met him in person but he had his email in a message he sent out.
Appreciate the detailed breakdown! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?
This feels a little bit like what Meshtastic wanted to achieve with MQTT, but better. I could imagine that Raspberry Pi node being able to connect to the wider mesh, but also serving as a WiFi oasis for people without a dedicated node, assuming I'm understanding it correctly.
There's a reason this hasn't been done before on lora ... The duty cycle and channel utilization will go through the roof. Especially with the duty cycle limitations in place in europe, this is a non-starter. You've essentially used up your airtime for an hour by sending an image and that voice clip. Even without those duty cycle limitations in place, any node that can hear you transmitting is effectively blocked while you are sending an image, file or audio clip. This cannot scale. Now imagine a router or repeater ... it takes 2-3 people sending an image or whatnot to essentially bring the service down. Built-in denial of service.
Yeah, it seems to be aimed more at users in areas that need to skirt around local law enforcement, rather than for large groups just having a chin wag.
This is assuming all connections are over LoRa. You can change your transport(repeater) settings to not forward attachments or limit message size. Good points though, however this is not a LoRa only network. Also it does not utilize flood routing.
It can and does scale. Here in North America, there are no duty limits on 915 MHz. Not every node in a Reticulum network (whether it be running over LoRa, TCP, packet radio, etc) is a repeater as in the case of Meshtastic. Reticulum uses table based routing with destinations rather than channels and flood routing in the case of Meshtastic.
@@rfnexusyt No, it cannot scale, even without duty cycle limitations. All you have to do to take down a local mesh is send people a bunch of pictures. Built-in denial of service. They should disable the sending of files over radio interfaces, whether it is lora or packet.
this network provide security and privacy, for example meshtastic advertises position of your router for everyone on earth to see, and other things in strange non privacy way, so yeah these networks are for totally different audience. Meshtastic is more like open wifi and reticulum is more like TOR audience.
amazing walk thru, watched it as i set mine up. worked 1st time, just need somebody else with one around here :( Does the phone have to still be connected for it to work if i go out of range? also does it pick up meshtastic nodes as well ? trying to work out whats better areound here. RETICULUM or MESHTASTIC.
meshtastic and reticulum use different protocols so unfortunately no. if you want to do just messaging or sending files (possible with a windows program) then yeah but if you want something like ssh or ip or something else than reticulum is your go to
8:00 no antenna? But beyond that, will you be going over the Windows version? Will it work on ATAK? And Ihad a few other questions, but can't remember. Great video and I'm VERY excited about this! Oh yea, does it have the mapping and GPS like Meshtastic?
@@mrw1160 Reticulum is just the communication protocol, think of it as an alternative to ip/tcp. The protocol relies on the crytography of the packets being encrypted to locate and communicate with other devices on the mesh, and the messaging application uses another protocol on top of reticulum called LXMF.
So theoretically you could develop a security camera that doesn't require a connection to the internet using this? Maybe not full live transmitting long video feeds but screenshots?
Well followed this video 100% and for some reason can not get data from any of my pc/lap top etc (one of our lap tops is all sing and dance top spec one ) to node and it the same node that's on the video tried different data cables and still not playing ball. Has any one got any idea please . As I am close to putting node in a vice and tightening it 😂 as a hammer is far to messy
That's really cool! I don't have any V3's with me but I do have a couple of T-Decks. If I were to flash them could they be used as standalone devices (like with Meshtastic) to message back and forth, or is it the same as your V3 demonstration?
Not really. It just uses all the available bandwidth ( when sending photos / voice ). LoRa is not designed to handle that, one or two people sending a photo over a LoRa mesh will deny service to everyone else.
@@oggaBugga It's perfectly fine if it adheres to duty cycle limits and other ISM restrictions. Does it adhere to duty cycle limits? LoRa isn't "not designed" for anything. If you follow ISM band restrictions, you can do anything with LoRa. ISM bans aren't only for Meshtastic. ISM bands are busy. If you use ISM bands, design your protocol with packet loss in mind.
It's a LOT more performant than meshtastic. Meshtastic basically wastes a whole bunch of airtime to get even simple text messages through. Reticulum has proper (and extremely efficient) routing, so the number of nodes on the network will not negatively affect it as on meshtastic. The "dumb repeating" of meshtastic wastes an incredible amount of airtime, and Reticulum is a lot more well thought out in how it handles packet routing.
T114 firmware is still in progress. It works, but I have some issues with the display update speed, so it's not available in the official firmware yet. I have some commits on my liamcottle/RNode_Firmware repo on the T114 branch.
It would be so cool to see someone actually solder and actual ESP 32 health tech on an actual smart phone and be encapsulated inside the phone with an antenna jack on it❤
Next video you got to explain how this effects meshtastic and how using this and sending pics and other things will take a lot more bandwidth and if their is a lot of people it will not work as well as meshtastic. Would love to see the pros and cons of meshtastic vs reti
@@andykirby That isn't entirely accurate. If you use Reticulum over LoRa in North America, for example, you are going to be using 915 MHz. Now, you can choose TCP or Packet Radio interface, in which case the communication wouldn't be over LoRa, and that is definitely an option
@@frustratedalien666there's about 100 250khz wide frequency slots in the US, I'm sure you can find a clear one, and multiple Rnodes can be used together to give more capacity.
People can do whatever they want as long as it's compliant with laws. Duty cycle limits are there to stop interference. Does this firmware/app follow the duty cycle limits? If so, stop complaining.
@@andykirby It's to update firmware simultaneously on multiple remote nodes. I need this to develop and test my routing algorithm. It's very custom and low level, unfortunately. I have spoken with the Meshtastic devs about implementing it native, but didn't get much interest or support. I suspect they have enough on their plate.
@@andykirby btw, my MeshTXT web client has support for file transfer over Meshtastic. Obviously not ideal to try sending 5mb PDFs or whatever, but something like a 2kb configuration file can be transferred pretty quickly depending on your LoRa preset.
Reticulum is a southern sky astronomical constellation-kind of wish they hadn’t chosen it a a trade name. The Latin reticulum or reticuli refers to a ‘net’.
Hi, I made a comment an hour ago but it doesn't seem to be showing up, has it been mistakenly caught in some spam filter? I notice none of the comments mention the name of the project so wonder if that could be it
@AndyKirby ... I suppose sending a 7 k voicefile in 1 minute ... makes it against the rules ... or doesn't it ? ... would take just a few stations to completely zap the lora-channels ... or ? ... Such a file of that length will need the highest data-speed if it sends it in less then a minute ... i sup[pose much more that would be permitted ... i also suppose that at that speed the usual Lora range would be way less as for example compared to Meshtastic ... just guessing ... But hey , nice project, well done and lots of innovations to play with.
It is against the rules, yes. Also, yes, it would cause problems. Routers/repeaters are not possible with this for a start. If you have to go through more hops, not only will you eat through your own duty cycle limit, but also the other nodes. There's a reason this has never been done on lora ... not that it's impossible or hard ... it's just a terrible idea.
@@detaart Reticulum does not use flood routing. It uses table based routing unlike Meshtastic. Not every node is a repeater. It is an option you can enable, which is the Transport function. RNodes are just an interface for the network stack itself, and one of many you can use with it.
@@rfnexusyt Even if repeating is opt-in, lora is still very poorly suited to a protocol that offers file transfers. I can't see this scaling at all. The only other radio interface options i can find in the docs are AX.25 with KISS routing or just plain old KISS routing. FSK @ 1200 baud ... yeah yeah i know, it doesn't have to be, but reasonably speaking, that's what it is very likely to be. Yeah i don't see this working. If they can keep the file transfers to high speed networks only, then fine, but i don't think anyone will be happy in HAM land either if you nuke a channel for 10 minutes because you are trying to send a picture.
Fun fact: they originally proposed a EU standard frequency 0.03 MHz higher but when the Germans were asked if they approve, they shouted: "867.530 Nein!"
Depends on your use case. If you are plotting against the regime of some country, from within that country, reticulum / sideband may be of some use. But for the average user it is essentially pointless ( especially over LoRa )
Why Meshtactic? When you can just use your cellphone? Or get a Ham license and $30 VHF-UHF radio? Ask the people in Austin TX why they are installing solar Meshtactic nodes all over the Austin area. In January, the forecasted weather isn't looking so good.
@@XRinger Why meshtastic? 1. Cell operators / the powers that be can monitor cellphones. 2. HAM radio is not encrypted, not a mesh, is not mapping enabled and has lots of undesirables using it. 3. With meshtastic friends / family / groups can easily communicate without others listening in or interfering with comms. Solar nodes have batteries...................
As far as I've understand the documentation I can't use sensors, like a BME680, attached to the RNode to transmit telemetry data. That's a real drawback compared to Meshtastic.
You are transmitting at 22dBm and doing image/voice transfer on a frequency that only allows for 14dBm and has a 1% transmit duty cycle (36 seconds per hour)…
The rules are there for a reason. It’s pretty selfish to use shared spectrum like this, and recommending your TH-cam audience to do the same is especially bad.
Glad to see the Heltec V3 firmware is out now. I think I'll pop back over to Reticulum and take a look again.
Really enjoying these types of videos
A different beast to Meshtastic, I like the agnostic interface options. Lora SX1280 would be an interesting choice for transport mode, with no duty cycle, license free ISM, providing a higher speed shorter range backbone, with the advantages of CHIRP over standard WiFi modulation, when suitably provisioned. A nice hobby nonetheless.
Wow, incredible stuff! Thank you for sharing!
Your shack looks like mine now great Video will try this out 73
Brill video. just got in to Meshtastic at christmas and havent managed to pick anything up here, guess nobody has it :( but this is temping to flash my heltec and see if node are around here with this software. seems more advanced that u can send pictures etc. great guide, you make it look easy lol
It might take some exploring. I take mine with me when I go out sometimes and pick up some interesting stuff. I met a guy through meshtastic flying a kite with the node on it. Never met him in person but he had his email in a message he sent out.
Could the BLE pairing code be rendered in a smaller font on the RNode? Is a handy old-person filter.
I personally have no use for something like this, but it is very cool! 👍
You're setting the radio settings by hand there. Is the firmware automatically compliant with the strict duty cycle restrictions?
oi you got a license to say that
Waiting for Meshtastic to implement these features
Pmr has been great this week, Birmingham, Liverpool and southend on my 12 inch dipole from st Ives Cambridge
Yep there's been an amazing lift on 😁
What radio do you use Dave?
@@TRIPPLEJAY00 crt space, keep it simple
@@TRIPPLEJAY00 and the boafang uv5r, no big power
Appreciate the detailed breakdown! A bit off-topic, but I wanted to ask: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How should I go about transferring them to Binance?
Does this work on a tbeam with WiFi? It doesn’t say anything about it in the manual.
It'll work on a T-Beam, but only via Bluetooth or USB
what do i have to setup in the US do i have to set it at channel 915
This feels a little bit like what Meshtastic wanted to achieve with MQTT, but better. I could imagine that Raspberry Pi node being able to connect to the wider mesh, but also serving as a WiFi oasis for people without a dedicated node, assuming I'm understanding it correctly.
Correct
What is the range?
There's a reason this hasn't been done before on lora ...
The duty cycle and channel utilization will go through the roof. Especially with the duty cycle limitations in place in europe, this is a non-starter. You've essentially used up your airtime for an hour by sending an image and that voice clip.
Even without those duty cycle limitations in place, any node that can hear you transmitting is effectively blocked while you are sending an image, file or audio clip. This cannot scale.
Now imagine a router or repeater ... it takes 2-3 people sending an image or whatnot to essentially bring the service down. Built-in denial of service.
Yeah, it seems to be aimed more at users in areas that need to skirt around local law enforcement, rather than for large groups just having a chin wag.
This is assuming all connections are over LoRa. You can change your transport(repeater) settings to not forward attachments or limit message size. Good points though, however this is not a LoRa only network. Also it does not utilize flood routing.
It can and does scale. Here in North America, there are no duty limits on 915 MHz. Not every node in a Reticulum network (whether it be running over LoRa, TCP, packet radio, etc) is a repeater as in the case of Meshtastic. Reticulum uses table based routing with destinations rather than channels and flood routing in the case of Meshtastic.
@@rfnexusyt No, it cannot scale, even without duty cycle limitations. All you have to do to take down a local mesh is send people a bunch of pictures. Built-in denial of service.
They should disable the sending of files over radio interfaces, whether it is lora or packet.
this network provide security and privacy, for example meshtastic advertises position of your router for everyone on earth to see, and other things in strange non privacy way, so yeah these networks are for totally different audience. Meshtastic is more like open wifi and reticulum is more like TOR audience.
amazing walk thru, watched it as i set mine up. worked 1st time, just need somebody else with one around here :( Does the phone have to still be connected for it to work if i go out of range? also does it pick up meshtastic nodes as well ? trying to work out whats better areound here. RETICULUM or MESHTASTIC.
meshtastic and reticulum use different protocols so unfortunately no. if you want to do just messaging or sending files (possible with a windows program) then yeah but if you want something like ssh or ip or something else than reticulum is your go to
Can I use my HeltecV3 e ink?
Hi Andy. Thanks for the great video. I tried to join the Discord server but it says the link has probably expired...
What I feel we really need is Meshtastic hardware with more memory to do OTA updates to remote nodes that are difficult to get to.
And mailboxes.
Reticulum has mailboxes :)
There's BBS software on meshtastic.
Does this stack implement proper long distance mesh routing? Something better than just message forwarding?
Yes watch this.
streaming.media.ccc.de/38c3/relive/837
@andykirby Thank you! From your video it's not clear how Reticulum Transport is different from regular meshing. Hopefully this link will elaborate.
There is firmware for Heltec T114, but after RNODE install it wont generate a pin to bluetooth connect. So maybe later the T114 can be used for RNODE
Interesante tema, voy adquirir estos heltec, gracias.
8:00 no antenna? But beyond that, will you be going over the Windows version? Will it work on ATAK? And Ihad a few other questions, but can't remember. Great video and I'm VERY excited about this!
Oh yea, does it have the mapping and GPS like Meshtastic?
At 8:00 there's no transmitter Enabled so no need to worry.😉 I'll go over the other platforms yes. You can do GPS and mapping as well.
So the RNode won't work on it's own aka just in the Heltec v3? You need it paired with a phone/pi for it to work continuously?
Correct
Hopefully there is enough room for meshtastic and this.
Pros and cons to Meshtastic lora?
Meshtastic has aes256 encryption, text only no voice no file sending
I'm not sure if Reticulum encrypts and it can do audio
@@mrw1160all Reticulum traffic is encrypted
@@mrw1160 Reticulum is just the communication protocol, think of it as an alternative to ip/tcp. The protocol relies on the crytography of the packets being encrypted to locate and communicate with other devices on the mesh, and the messaging application uses another protocol on top of reticulum called LXMF.
@@mrw1160 Andy stated this is encrypted.
How can i Shutdown my Heltec V3? It's always running until the Battery is empty.
Hold the user button for a few seconds
MORE!
So theoretically you could develop a security camera that doesn't require a connection to the internet using this? Maybe not full live transmitting long video feeds but screenshots?
Yep, it would be very easy to do
Is this better than meshtastic
i think there is a CLI client that will autofind the firmware you need
Well followed this video 100% and for some reason can not get data from any of my pc/lap top etc (one of our lap tops is all sing and dance top spec one ) to node and it the same node that's on the video tried different data cables and still not playing ball. Has any one got any idea please . As I am close to putting node in a vice and tightening it 😂 as a hammer is far to messy
am I the only one who started singing "Jenny" when Andy entered his UK frequency? 13:55
@liamcottle Hi, how do I get this to work on a RAK without a display?
The web flasher has a "read display" feature for devices like the RAK 4631 without a display. Useful for getting the pairing code.
Would it work on a lillygo standalone?
awesome .. lets go, look what drones did
I followed this for both my nodes and all working but the second node states down any ideas? Thanks in advance
after more tinkering.... the sideband app keeps enabling wifi in hardware if i turn that off its working, strange, but will setup a pi soon. thanks
Andy why were you gone for so long? It's sad without you.
That's really cool! I don't have any V3's with me but I do have a couple of T-Decks. If I were to flash them could they be used as standalone devices (like with Meshtastic) to message back and forth, or is it the same as your V3 demonstration?
See the community edition RNode firmware. The t-deck and t-ech are not officially supported
Is this more performant than Mestastic, or something else? Does it run at 868 MHz?
Not really. It just uses all the available bandwidth ( when sending photos / voice ).
LoRa is not designed to handle that, one or two people sending a photo over a LoRa mesh will deny service to everyone else.
@@oggaBugganot true
@@oggaBugga It's perfectly fine if it adheres to duty cycle limits and other ISM restrictions. Does it adhere to duty cycle limits?
LoRa isn't "not designed" for anything. If you follow ISM band restrictions, you can do anything with LoRa. ISM bans aren't only for Meshtastic. ISM bands are busy. If you use ISM bands, design your protocol with packet loss in mind.
@quarteratom Try again
It's a LOT more performant than meshtastic. Meshtastic basically wastes a whole bunch of airtime to get even simple text messages through. Reticulum has proper (and extremely efficient) routing, so the number of nodes on the network will not negatively affect it as on meshtastic. The "dumb repeating" of meshtastic wastes an incredible amount of airtime, and Reticulum is a lot more well thought out in how it handles packet routing.
Duty cycle is important especially on the ism bands
Well at least both systems use the same hardware so people can repurpose
PLEASE
which firmware must i choose for the heltec t114 ?
T114 firmware is still in progress. It works, but I have some issues with the display update speed, so it's not available in the official firmware yet. I have some commits on my liamcottle/RNode_Firmware repo on the T114 branch.
@@LiamCottle My T114 has no display so wouldn't be an issue for me currently.
Hi, how do I get this to work on a RAK without a display?
It would be so cool to see someone actually solder and actual ESP 32 health tech on an actual smart phone and be encapsulated inside the phone with an antenna jack on it❤
Doesn't work with heltek v2, shows error in point 3 [ selected device is not an RNode] on the display [hardware failure], has anyone had this?
I'm on a v3 and getting the same problem
Does TAK run over this?
The freetakserver utilizes reticulum.
@ I was looking into replicating beartooth without the having to sell a kidney :)
@@HMBM-7777th you could also just do what beartooth does and use Digimesh and do the exact same thing Beartooth does but with $200
if it works with wifi why cant we use a laptop / rpi5 wifi instead of android adb mobile or lora device?
You can! I did say this.
Thanks brother!
Keep building
Cellsol is also an interesting project
I think BBS functionally is on the way too.
Next video you got to explain how this effects meshtastic and how using this and sending pics and other things will take a lot more bandwidth and if their is a lot of people it will not work as well as meshtastic. Would love to see the pros and cons of meshtastic vs reti
We are using a different frequency here to meshtastic so it won't affect it at all 😁
@@andykirby That isn't entirely accurate. If you use Reticulum over LoRa in North America, for example, you are going to be using 915 MHz. Now, you can choose TCP or Packet Radio interface, in which case the communication wouldn't be over LoRa, and that is definitely an option
@@frustratedalien666there's about 100 250khz wide frequency slots in the US, I'm sure you can find a clear one, and multiple Rnodes can be used together to give more capacity.
@@andykirby Do you see this supplanting meshtastic?
People can do whatever they want as long as it's compliant with laws. Duty cycle limits are there to stop interference. Does this firmware/app follow the duty cycle limits? If so, stop complaining.
IOS needeeed
I've implemented files over Meshtastic and now it feels kind of redundant.
Did you? Can you link your project?
@@andykirby It's to update firmware simultaneously on multiple remote nodes. I need this to develop and test my routing algorithm. It's very custom and low level, unfortunately. I have spoken with the Meshtastic devs about implementing it native, but didn't get much interest or support. I suspect they have enough on their plate.
@@andykirby btw, my MeshTXT web client has support for file transfer over Meshtastic. Obviously not ideal to try sending 5mb PDFs or whatever, but something like a 2kb configuration file can be transferred pretty quickly depending on your LoRa preset.
really excited about Qortal working over Reticulum
brain explosion.) See you.
If this could work with atak I feel like it would take off
It's being worked on
@TheAtomicZombie10 well keep me up to date
Lubrication...
Reticulum is a southern sky astronomical constellation-kind of wish they hadn’t chosen it a a trade name. The Latin reticulum or reticuli refers to a ‘net’.
Cry
I have set up a node, no one near me ...
Hi, I made a comment an hour ago but it doesn't seem to be showing up, has it been mistakenly caught in some spam filter? I notice none of the comments mention the name of the project so wonder if that could be it
💙👊😎
@AndyKirby ... I suppose sending a 7 k voicefile in 1 minute ... makes it against the rules ... or doesn't it ? ... would take just a few stations to completely zap the lora-channels ... or ? ... Such a file of that length will need the highest data-speed if it sends it in less then a minute ... i sup[pose much more that would be permitted ... i also suppose that at that speed the usual Lora range would be way less as for example compared to Meshtastic ... just guessing ... But hey , nice project, well done and lots of innovations to play with.
It is against the rules, yes. Also, yes, it would cause problems.
Routers/repeaters are not possible with this for a start. If you have to go through more hops, not only will you eat through your own duty cycle limit, but also the other nodes.
There's a reason this has never been done on lora ... not that it's impossible or hard ... it's just a terrible idea.
@@detaart Reticulum does not use flood routing. It uses table based routing unlike Meshtastic. Not every node is a repeater. It is an option you can enable, which is the Transport function. RNodes are just an interface for the network stack itself, and one of many you can use with it.
@@rfnexusyt Even if repeating is opt-in, lora is still very poorly suited to a protocol that offers file transfers. I can't see this scaling at all.
The only other radio interface options i can find in the docs are AX.25 with KISS routing or just plain old KISS routing.
FSK @ 1200 baud ... yeah yeah i know, it doesn't have to be, but reasonably speaking, that's what it is very likely to be.
Yeah i don't see this working.
If they can keep the file transfers to high speed networks only, then fine, but i don't think anyone will be happy in HAM land either if you nuke a channel for 10 minutes because you are trying to send a picture.
Fun fact: they originally proposed a EU standard frequency 0.03 MHz higher but when the Germans were asked if they approve, they shouted:
"867.530 Nein!"
Racist.
Then why Meshtastic ? This seems more capable.
As far as I can tell, Meshtastic is further along with approachable apps. Being an Apple user I know I'll be watching for an iOS version of Sideband.
@@DylanmoI was thinking the same thing as I watched this. It seems far too fiddly at the moment.
Depends on your use case. If you are plotting against the regime of some country, from within that country, reticulum / sideband may be of some use.
But for the average user it is essentially pointless ( especially over LoRa )
Why Meshtactic? When you can just use your cellphone? Or get a Ham license and $30 VHF-UHF radio?
Ask the people in Austin TX why they are installing solar Meshtactic nodes all over the Austin area.
In January, the forecasted weather isn't looking so good.
@@XRinger Why meshtastic?
1. Cell operators / the powers that be can monitor cellphones.
2. HAM radio is not encrypted, not a mesh, is not mapping enabled and has lots of undesirables using it.
3. With meshtastic friends / family / groups can easily communicate without others listening in or interfering with comms.
Solar nodes have batteries...................
cantsave to playlist this is not for children fixit!
As far as I've understand the documentation I can't use sensors, like a BME680, attached to the RNode to transmit telemetry data. That's a real drawback compared to Meshtastic.
You will be able to soon with micro reticulum, which is standalone, for now you could do it by using a Pi.
Why would you? For sensors, use LoRaWAN, or just simply rawdog LoRa. This isn't designed for sensors.
You are transmitting at 22dBm and doing image/voice transfer on a frequency that only allows for 14dBm and has a 1% transmit duty cycle (36 seconds per hour)…
Snitch
The rules are there for a reason. It’s pretty selfish to use shared spectrum like this, and recommending your TH-cam audience to do the same is especially bad.
It's 27dbm and 10% duty cycle in UK on 867.500Mhz (IR2030)
@@andykirby Only when you apply Adaptive Power Control (APC). Otherwise it's 14dBm and 1%.
APC or "other" mitigation techniques.
Will this be as rubbish as Meshtastic?
No, because you can use any type of connection you aren't just confined to low power radios.
That's a pretty low bar to hit. Not sure it's doable.
Interesting but not really friendly user 😮
STOP THAT CRAP
We Want More MESHTASTIC
MT has kinda peaked, IMO. And their devs are not easy to interact with
No.
Meshtastic is shite, I gave up on it
@@roryrobinson7136 why?
Scam for people who likes radios is all it really is
Snake sell out grass
thanks for sharing
Will meshtastic work with this can they send you messages