HUNGAyRIANS NEED TO MIGRATE BACK TO THEIR TRUE HOMELAND IN WESTERN SIBERIA AND ENJOY RULE OF RUSSIA WHICH THEY LOVE SO MUCH HERE INSTEAD OF ANNOYING THEIR NEIGHBOURS WITH TERRITORIAL CLAIMS AND EU WITH THEIR VETOING.
NATO's first secretary general, Hastings "Pug" Ismay, famously declared that the organization's mission was "to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down." NATO's mission has not changed in the more than seventy years since 1952 when the organisation founded to oppose the Soviet Union. The Soviet Union fell apart more than thirty years ago, and Russia is not the Soviet Union of old, and left Eastern Europe voluntarily leaving NATO without a mission, and yet the U.S. occupation forces remained in Germany consistent with the original NATO mission statement mentioned above? Russian President VIladimir Putin has claimed that he once raised the possibility of Russia joining NATO with then-President Bill Clinton, and that Clinton said he had "no objection." America remains as committed as ever to keeping the Germans down and preventing Europe from becoming a peer competitor by sabotaging Germany's burgeoning economic co-operation and partnership with Russia, which would have benefited all of us, and this was most vividly demonstrated by the destruction of Nordstream by the U.S., effectively an act of war on Germany. The war in Ukraine was supposed to accomplish two American foreign policy objectives, the first being to bring Russia to its knees economically and the second being to weaken Germany and Europe. Whilst the U.S. has failed abjectly in achieving the first objective, the EU appears to be trapped in a death spiral with industry now unable to rely on cheap energy from Russia relocating out of Germany and the EU while America profits from substituting it's own more expensive gas and it's insatiable Military Industrial Complex earning bilions from supplying new arms and ammunition to Ukraine and to replenish depleted European stocks.
I have always liked Hungary very much, to be part of a place as picturesque as Europe, it knows very well how to stand out, both its language, culture and traditions that are maintained and the contrast with the Modernity is fascinating to me, many greetings Hungarian brothers, they have left their mark on history, greetings from Mexico 🇭🇺❤️🇲🇽
@@ruleofpeacepriests6911So what? Slavs are migrated to the balkans and no one asked them to so🤣🤣😭 Source:en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavic_migrations_to_the_Balkans
@@tiborfarkas5180 This video is a TRASH! First of all the creator os separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
I think you are also descendants of the Scythians or Sarmatians, just like the Ugors - Hungarians and the Magors - Magyars, only you spoke a more Sarmatian-Slavic language! For example, the ruling class of the medieval Poles knew very well that they were once Sarmatians! Nowadays, many people dispute that the Slavic languages and peoples could be related to the Sarmatians or possibly the Scythians, and based on genetic and linguistic research, the roots of the Slavic peoples go back to the Iranian Sarmatians, since after the Scythians, the Sarmatians conquered and ruled the entire Eastern Europe, all the way to the Huns! Based on the archaeological research, the Sarmatians completely switched over to the Huns, but when the elite tribes of the Huns retreated to the east after the death of Atilla, the descendants of the Sarmatians remained here. And then this also explains why the Ugric Scythian language was limited to only one narrow area, the Carpathian basin! Anyway, as far as I know, the Slovak language has many words related to the Hungarian language, which would prove a long coexistence in the kingdom of Hungary, but maybe also a relationship between the peoples and the languages of Scythians and Sarmatians!
@@martinm3594 slavonia and zagreb were under hungarian influence, but southern than river sava croatia was fully independent, croatian nobles were totally free there, they had their money, they had their army, their cities and most important they could do whatever they wanted without king's permission. I know that in 1102 to 1527 we were in personal union and yes kings were rulers but these nobels were free and hungarians never established strong rule there, it was some kind of commowealth
🤣😂😝🤪= polish hungarian race connection -> sarmatians ! = only two kurva exist in europe = magyar + lengyel , the dwa bratanki + firewater : wodka + pálinka ! = 😏🤪
I have never seen such a good and elaborate video about the history of the Hungarians. I don't know the history of the Hungarians so much that I can tell where there is a flaw in it, but there was something I missed about it. I especially liked the prehistoric part and it looks like you spent a lot of time making it!
Péter Szilágyi, "such a good and elaborate video of the history of the Hungarians"..????? Teljesen elmentek otthonról? This video is a TRASH! First of all the creator os separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
Look the details, the pixels, the investigation about each country history, the time to search for information. MAN!!!! You're the ruler of history channels. 👍👍👍👍👍
Far cry hard from that: First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
Not really, the author ignored hundreds of years! First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
Incredible poor video. First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
Clar si concis. Nomazi, fara legatura cu vreun neam european, pusi pe japca pana in zilele noastre. Istoria, cea mai importanta stiinta si dovada a legitimitatilor natiunilor. Bravo!
Sunt ca un cui în mijlocul Europei. Cuiul care va face mereu rău celorlalte popoare, la umbra URSULUI din est. In realitate au fost mereu in umbra Austriei sau Rusiei. Ungaria Mare nu a existat ! Din păcate lobyul lor este ascultat mai ales în America. Minciunile ridicate la rang de adevăr.... O minciună repetată la infinit ajunge sa fie percepută că adevăr daca nu este contracarată cu argumente de adevărații istorici.
Nici nu-ţi dai seama că de fapt vorbeşti despre "Mioriţa", singura baladă originală despre etnogeneza reală a unui popor de păstori şi oieri nomazi din Balcani!
Oh man,making all those exclaves and enclaves must have been hard,and I am not even going to go into detail how terrible must have been making the fragmentation of Hungary in the 1300s. Anyways, amazing video and you'e got a new subscriber here.
The ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
Not really, ethusiastic, but poor work: First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
It is a general missunderstanding that the kingdom of Hungary doesn't exist under the rule of the Habsburgs. Each of them are crowned kings, Hungarian parliament functions.
Correct opinion, compared to Bohemia and Moravia, Hungary was more free. Nevertheless, the author did not describe it badly in the video, between 1700 and 1867 there was little Hungarian state, although you wrote it the emperor was legally the Hungarian king. Without a background grinder incineration, the video is not completely understanded.
I am a person who is going to study abroad in Hungary. I was so impressed that Hungary has a very long history and roots from Asia. Thank you for sharing this.
A very impressive piece of work, no doubt one which took a great deal of effort. There are a few minor errors on the Bulgarian border. For example, Darman and Kudelin resisted Hungarian rule in Braničevo from 1273-1291/1294, while Jacob Svetoslav's claim to the Bulgarian throne as a Hungarian vassal from 1266-1273 is not shown. Regardless, the attention put to small details is quite notable, good!
And few major errors as well: First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
You know, sometimes being different is fun. In America, while diversity may not be a strength per se, it makes life interesting. Hungary represents some of the best of Europe despite the people not being “truly European”. Architecture, art, climate and culture is very preservationist and traditional. But the crazy language and history keeps you on your toes. Presented an interesting dilemma some years ago when I found out they used Eastern Naming and I had been calling a cute lady by her first name for a long time haha. Also: Based Hungary. 🇺🇸❤️🇭🇺
Great video with full of mistakes. First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
😃I am impressed with this video about Hungarian lands 🇭🇺. And you started the video from the time when Hungarians lived near the Urals, before they settled in Pannonia. And the second thing I have noticed since the 90s is showing Hungarian prime ministers 9:34 , not presidents. Katalin Novák has been the current head of state in Hungary since this month, but Prime Minister Viktor Orban is in fact taking over most of power. I wonder why he never ran for president 🤔
Prime Minister and President are two different things. Also, despite what everyone says, I believe if Orbán wouldn't run for the position with highest power, FIDESZ MAYBE(!) wouldn't have supermajority (Although so many ppl hate Gyurcsány, who can be seen as the leader of the opposition, that maybe they's have that anyways)
Hungary is a parliamental republic, where the Head of State (aka the President) has only symbolical power. The first leader is the Head of Government (aka the Prime Minister). But the video shows Miklós Horthy, the Head of State (Regent) for the Kingdom of Hungary, and then also shows the Presidents for People's Republic of Hungary. But in those times, the Head of the Communist party was the highest power, and not the President. It should have shown Rákosi as leader from 1947 until 1956, then Kádár from 1956 until 1989. Even thought its still an amazing video!
The video is impressively mistaken. First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
After Mohacs (1526) there was no "Eastern Hungary". While Western Hungary belonged to the Austrians and Central Hungary became an Ottoman province, for about 170 years Transylvania was an autonomous state formation, under the suzerainty of the Ottoman Empire, first as the Principality of Erdel, then the Principality of Transylvania. Turkish historiography recorded this fact, correctly naming the respective state formation which had its own leadership.
(I hope you understand what I'm writing because I'm translating this with Google Translate because I don't know English yet) Hi! I am Hungarian, I live in Slovakia because of the Trianon peace dictatorship signed 102 years ago. This video got really good, just keep going!
CsabiTube, megnézted te rendesen ezt a videót? First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
@Defender of Flop Ok, i understand, but this does not mean we should ignore crucial mistakes; in fact when the goal is the biggest accuracy. So now he has the chance to correct it.
Not slovak, but calling it dictatorship is ridiculious. How is it dictatorship, If a culture living on a certain territory where they are a majority, gets their own country? It makes no sense. Hungarians were oppresors of Many cultures under their territory(which arrived before the hungarians) yet they still act like they are the victims. Absolutely Shameless. Trianon was fair
Wow this is insane, as i expected! You make it very well mate, and earn a new subscriber! My only problem is, you dont make Ajtony's Principality, but hey, everything else is amazing. Thank you!
First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
I am a Greek and i have to say. Greece. Bulgaria. Serbia an Hungary have a lot in common. We all lost our nearby land. And we all want it back. Especially as Greeks want Northern Epirus and Constantinople.
Hungarians have owned that territory for a long time, but now the Hungarians living there are oppressed by the 🇺🇦 government & can’t speak their language in schools.
@@schutzanzug4518 You are obviuosly Russian bot because nowadays Hungarians do not live in the steppes of Ukraine (they live in Transcarpathian region). And Hungarians can speak their language free in Ukraine but they also must know the state (Ukrainian) language (as well as in every state of Europe children of ethnic minorities learn the state language at school). So it is pure propaganda that Hungarian children are prohibited to speak or to learn Hungarian at Hungarian schools in Ukraine.
@@TheOlgaSasha there is a minority of Hungarians that live there. Go do your own research, but Hungarian gatherings have been raided on camera for no apparent reason, Ukraine has been pressuring minorities for a while, and get this, 80% of the population of Carpathia wanted autonomy or independence, after the breakup of the Soviet Union when they were now apart of Ukraine. Of course the Ukraine never has given them autonomy, still, along with all of the other people Ukraine oppresses, like the Russians.
if you don't like living in Ukraine, then you should return back to your real homeland, and not spread the propaganda of idea of being a separate country as simple as that But of course, you'll ignore my comment, because you won't find a counterarguement against the truth@@schutzanzug4518
@@TheOlgaSashaTheir cruel minority laws have brought the separatists upon themselves. They have only themselves to blame for what happened, as the Russians there did not want to secede in the first place.
Bardzo dobra robota. Naprawde gościu, podziwiam cię za to. Jesteś chyba jednym z najbardziej dokładnych kanałów na youtubie. nie wiem czy nie zacząc podobnego kontentu do ciebie bo mapping nie ma sensu. Pozdrawiam.
Good video, really well made, I just don't get why you dignuti depict Habsburg-controlled Hungary and Croatia from 1527 up until the Austro-Hungarian Treaty, but other than that really a great job man.
First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
După Mohacs (1526) nu a mai existat ”Eastern Hungary”. În timp ce Vestul Ungariei era la austrieci iar Ungaria Centrală a devenit provincie otomană, timp de circa 170 de ani aproximativ actuala Transilvanie a fost formațiune statală autonomă, sub suzeranitatea Imperiului Otoman, mai întâi cu numele de Principatul Erdel, apoi Principatul Transilvaniei -cum corect prezentați. Istoriografia turcească (și nu doar ea!) a consemnat acest fapt, denumind corect respectiva formațiune statală, care avea conducere proprie.
Correct. Dar scrie si in engleza, sa se vada adevarul , nu mai sta nimeni sa dea google translate din romana. Ungurii in general imprastie falsurile in engleza ca sa le inteleaga toti si cat mai multi.
@Tovalokodonc Can you learn other languages and not make fun of people? Or just translate it atleast? How pitiful. Plus, you expect people to know thousands of languages at once, right?
There was, just the author is ignorant. Further mistakes: First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
@@atillakrisztian8023 Én értem, csak azt nem hogy miért nem nézted meg figyelmesen a videót. Még ha a szándék nemes is volt, igazából munició a magyarellenes propagandistáknak :/
We Romanians may not get along too well with Hungarians because of historical and ethnical reasons but relations had improved somehow and a lot of mixed marriages between those two are proofs we get along pretty well.
Great video.. I have a few questions, if Hungarians came from Central Asia, why is the language so similar to Estonian and Finnish, and why do they look Northern European? Thanks for your amazing work and you have a new subscriber here! 🙂
The Hungarian language is related to the Finnish and Estonian languages but practically unintelligible (like other languages). They are part of the Finno-Ugric group. It looks like a European population because their nomadic ancestors were not very numerous, they conquered the Pannonian space and others only militarily and later linguistically not ethnically. The Hungarian kingdom in general throughout its history has been a small "empire" of many ethnic groups (Hungarians, Cumans, Romanians, Slavs, Germans, etc.). The nomadic population has been reduced in battle over time and has mixed with the majority native population of the Carpathian Basin, so it looks like Europeans .
Because in central Asia there was white europeans lived. The Hunnic invasian, and the others too just a retreat, because mongolid races become too strong. Interestingly, some of the Attilas hunnic wariors have balkanic genes. Their burial found in nowadays Mongolia.
@@xerxen100Are the Hungarians the remnants of the Huns, who were a group of Turkic descent who came from Central Asia to Europe in the fourth century AD under the command of A.T.I.L.A. They did not come to Europe
@@muhammadmahdikarimi12 Partially. The ruler elite were certainly the remnants of Attila and his Huns. The commoners were mixed aboriginals, slavs, Avars, germans, vikings, semitic peoples, turks, Iranians and many more. But the core were always the Huns, till the 16th century, after that and nowadays the Jews rule Hungary.
You missed the Hungarian Kingdom under Habsburg rule: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Hungary#Middle_Ages " Although the borders shifted frequently during this period, the three parts can be identified, more or less, as follows: Royal Hungary, which consisted of northern and western territories where Ferdinand I was recognized as king of Hungary. This part is viewed as defining the continuity of the Kingdom of Hungary. The territory along with Ottoman Hungary suffered greatly from the nearly constant wars taking place. Ottoman Hungary: The Great Alföld (i.e. most of present-day Hungary, including south-eastern Transdanubia and the Banat), partly without north-eastern present-day Hungary. Eastern Hungarian Kingdom under the Szapolyai. Note that this territory, often under Ottoman influence, was different from Transylvania proper and included various other territories sometimes referred to as Partium. Later the entity was called Principality of Transylvania." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Hungary_(1526%E2%80%931867) upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/Central_europe_1572.png
@@sghxcy Na ja. És minden egyes ilyen hungarian history videónál ezt elrontják... Csak nem tudom, hogy miért mert eléggé egyértelmű, hogy létezett Magyarország Habsburg uralom alatt...
@@tibi7402 Azért mert a sok képzetlen, műveletlen ember keveri a Habsburg "Birodalmat" Ausztriával, holott maga a Habsburg Birodalom is csak azon területek összessége volt ahol Habsburg uralkodó volt, nem volt egy ország stb. Nem képesek felfogni...
First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
Well three are many issues with this map, still one of the better maps made so far. - many inadvertences about the conquest period, for example the fact that between 899-950 the Italian Kingdom, between 919-933 the Eastern Frankish Kingdom (future Germany), between 926-934 the Provence duchy, between 934-959 the Byzantine empire paid tribute to the Hungarians was not shown, - the conquests in upper Hungary of Gábor Bethlen and I. Gyorgy Rákóczi not shown at all, - between 1526-1848, 1849-1867 Hungary did not disappeared. The Hungarian kingdom did not disappeared in these centuries, the Habsburg emperors were crowned Hungarian kings, Hungary having its own Diet, laws, army, etc. Queen Maria Tereza had to beg the Hungarian Diet to send the Hungarian troops to help her against Friedrich the Great. Hungary did not disappeared, it existed as kingdom, and the Habsburgs were its kings. Yes, it was not a totally free region, but still had an important autonomy, and Hungarian statehood, as kingdom did not disappeared... You shown the different autonomous regions in Hungary before 1526, but you did not shown Hungary, when it became an autonomous region herself. Better to say much more than an autonomous region. - You did not shown the Rákóczi freedom war from 1703-1711 at all. And it were some other smaller issues too.
A very good video !!! , but with small corrections. After the battle of Mohacs (1526) there was no Eastern Hungary, it was called only Transylvania and was a multiethnic state (Romanians-majority , Hungarians, Germans, Szeklers, Slavs, etc.), suzerain state of the Ottoman Empire and sometimes independent and which concluded treaties with other European countries on an equal footing. And the current area of Transylvania was gradually conquered in about 150 years, not in 50 years after the arrival of the Hungarian tribes led by Arpad - as it appears in the video.
"After the battle of Mohacs (1526) there was no Eastern Hungary" No, there was eastern Hungarian kingdom. Its later renamed to Transylvania, when the Habsburg set an agreement with the hungarian king about the reunification of Hungary under habsburg rule.
@@xerxen100you're right, it was called eastern Hungary at first, but only because the nobility was hungarian. Most of the population was romanian, as they are native to that land
I will say that the Szekely and Saxon land remained separate from proper Hungarian counties until 1876, so I believe those should've still been included up until then. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counties_of_Hungary_(1000%E2%80%931920)#Modernised_counties_(1867%E2%80%931920) Modernised Counties - Paragraph 2, 3, 4 Also, the military frontiers were not abolished until 1881, and the military frontiers essentially acted as marches (otherwise called margravate, marquis, etcetera), en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_(territory)#Habsburg_Empire en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Frontier so I believe those should fit the definition of vassal, and should be included as well, regardless of if Habsburg Hungary is not shown in its entirety. If this conflicted with what you read, feel free to disregard it, but thank you very much for this video again!
@@botiabonyi In the summer of the year 410, Visigoths from Eastern Europe ended a three-day sack of the city of Rome (now the capital of Italy). This was the first time Rome had been defeated in nearly 800 years. As for the Visigoths themselves: they were an early Germanic people who, along with the Ostrogoths, constituted the two major political entities of the Goths within the Roman Empire in late antiquity, or what is known as the Migration Period. So early Eastern Germanic Tribes, and not the Hungarians. And if you still need more clarity on the subject, you can feel free to google the history of the fall of the Roman Empire yourself.
Awesome video! What are you sources for the Hungarian conquest of Transylvania in the 900’s from Bulgaria? There are many conflicting sources and it is not well documented, but I know you are meticulous with your work going as far to use medieval border stones
No historical source says they conquered Transilvania from Bulgaria, idk what have u been smoking but its nit good for your health, Hungarian sources speak of a man named Gelou as the Ruler of Transilvania, Glad in Banat and Menumorut in Parthium/Crisana, and after Gelou was defeated by the magyar chieftain Tuhutum his son Went to banat where he resisted the magyar conquest for some more time, and then Gyla/Iuliu the 1st up to Gyula/Iuliu the 3rd were probably the descendants of Ahtum, or not, by this time the magyar sources tend to differ, I only used Hungarian sources for my statement, in case I m acused of Bias or something.
@@gigachad3457 Transylvania is a region in the center of Romania (between the Carpathians). The first civilization that got here is uncertain. Some people say that scythians were here first, or they lived near Transylvania, not IN Transylvania. The most plausible and logical civilization that got here first are the dacians. Dacians are a thracian tribe that had the capital at Sarmizegetusa Regia (between the Apuseni and the Southerner Mountains). It is said that these guys had a good technology for the time, they had kind of a good armor and arms, but also, the agricultural tech was impressively well developed. Then the romans conquered Dacia, and founded the cities that still exist: Apulum (Alba Iulia/Gyula Fehervar/Alba Julia), Potaissa (Turda/Torda) and Porolissum (Zalau). The romans really struggled to take over the region, as the dacians won the first battles (102-103), but the romans finally made it in 105-106. There is also a rumor that Transylvania was so rich in gold, that when the romans discovered these gold mines, the roman penny got 2 times bigger (it was made of gold, obviously). And now starts the romanization of Dacia. You might know already that we are a latin-speaking countrry (I am talking about Romania). There are a lot of events, that, either I dont know, or are too complicated, so I m gonna oversimplify this a little. After the roman fell, a lot of tribes moved here (slavs, bulgarians, goths, germans and ofc, hungarians). Well, we were influenced by the slavs, and we still have a lot of slavic words and with this combination of slavs, romans and dacians, we got to the point where the nationality known as vlach (romanian) was created. We were spread all over the place from Tisa to the Nistru river. And now comes the most controversial part, the hungarians. I ve spoke to a lot of hungarians about this subject, and their opinion is so biased that I cant say they re version of the story bc I didnt understand anything =)). Anyways, they came from behind the Urals mountains, as you saw in the vid. While they were still a nomad state, we were already here, in Transylvania. When they got here, they even recognised the fact that here are already people, different people, and these people in Transylvania, were led by some slavic and vlach origin people: Litovoi, Menumorut and Gelu/Gelou. They were killed by hungarians and they became the leaders of Transylvania now. This is how the "beautiful" hungarian-romanian relations started. In the 1600 s, vlachs started to question about Transylvania and the Union of romanians, so Mihai Viteazu (Michael the Brave) united all these (Moldova, Transylvania and Vallachia) after the ottomans took Buda and Pest, but this lasted for just a couple of months when the polish sided the corrupt puppet of Moldova and the hungarians so it all failed. As you already understood, the dacians and romans are ancestors of ours (just to make an end)
@@gigachad3457 TRANSYLVANIA WAS ESTABLISHED BY HUNGARIANS TRANSYLVANIA WAS NAMED BY THE HUNGARIANS TRANSYLVANIA WAS INHABITED BY HUNGARIANS FOR THE LONGEST TIME OF IT'S TODAY ETHNICITIES. TRANSYLVANIA WAS INHABITED BY THE HUNGARIANS FROM THE OLDEST TIMES MAKING THEM THE MOST NATIVE OF THEIR LANDS. TRANSYLVANIA WAS WAS OWNED BY THE HUNGARIANS FOR THE LONGEST TIME. TRANSYLVANIA WAS RULED BY THE HUNGARIANS FOR THE LONGEST TIME. TRANSYLVANIA WAS MANAGED AND BUILT BY THE HUNGARIANS MAINLY, FOR THE LONGEST TIME. THAT’S WHY IT LOOKS NOTHING LIKE vlachia AND moldova BECAUSE 🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺TRANSYLVANIA IS IN FACT HUNGARIAN! 🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺 INHABITED BY THIEF CUCKOOS YET.. WE SETTLED THE ILLITERATE PRIMITIVE VLACHS INTO TRANSYLVANIA IN THE 13TH CENTURY AND WE'RE GONNA EXPELL THEM FROM THERE RIGHTFULLY AS WELL! AFTER WE RETOOK IT BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY. WE CONQUERED THE CHARPATIAN BASIN IT IS RIGHTFULLY ONLY HUNGARIAN NONE OF THOSE THIEVES CONQUERED ANYTHING FROM HUNGARY.
@@gigachad3457 Do not believe the vile rumanians they are deliberately lying! Their identity is false. Unfortunately they believe those tales and treat them as fact. Because most of their identity is based on baseless Hungarophobia, because of their frustration from being a lesser ethnicity, because their past is nothing compared to the great Hungarian nation's, and they want it to be so proud and ancient, but they can't reach that moral level, that's why they lie to themselves. to put their undeveloped minds in a comfort zone. This is pure human greed the degeneration and decay of human morality. No wonder, because living in the shadow of one of the most influential, beautiful and one of the most ancient cultural nations of Central Europe as simple vassals with an irrelevant past as illiterate homeless sheepherders with a lack of honor and decency. They don't really have own history that’s their problem. No wonder why they are trying to steal other's and they are learning more false Hungarian history in their history ed. than theirs. Vlachs first settled in Cumania(wallachia) after Bulgaria around the 12th century. They were a migratory transhumance illiterate sheperd people.They got civilized first by the Bulgars. They originated from Albania their language is so similar it's almost identical and their homeless ancestors are still living in Albania. Their migration happened in small migrations. The voivodship of Litovo made the first attempts to unite the anointings and voivodships along the Zil. In 1279 he no longer recognized his subordinate status, so the Hungarian king sent armies against him. Before the establishment of Wallachoa they were already subjugated by the Hungarians. The Litovo voivode was killed in the battle, and his brother, Bărbat, was taken prisoner of war. To replace it, the Hungarian king asked for a huge sum this subjugation lasted for the end of the 14th century and In the early 15th in 1417, Wallachia was forced to accept the suzerainty of the Ottoman Empire this lasted until the 19th century, with brief periods of Russian occupation between 1768 and 1854. From Moldovia is a Hungarian established state in the 14th century and a vassal of the Huns until the 16th century. With short periods of temporary independence. In 1538 Moldavia was vassal of the Ottomans to 1774 and from 1774 to 1918 was the vassal of Russia. That’s where their frustration comes from because of having no own history almost. They are truly suffering from inferiority complex. About the vlach vile lies he modern scientific results refute this outdated theory based on Medieval phantasies (created more than 1000 years after the relevant events) and modern myth-building. The ancient Romans reported that they exterminated the Dacians of the conquered territories, and free Dacians left it, and the territory was populated by settlers from the empire. Thus, Dacians were never Romanised. And later the population of Provincia Dacia was emptied by that empire and was invaded by Goths and other groups, no Dacians were reported later in territory or Romania. Romanians have no Dacian myths or historical memories, they never called themselves Dacians, and nobody called them Dacians. The Hungarian contemporary documents did not report any Dacians/Romanians before the 13th century, but they report their immigration after this era, and this is in line with other historical sources and the results of modern linguistic and genetics. Romanians absolutely do not use any ancient Dacian / Roman settlement names, they use Hungarian and Slavic toponyms in the territory of the Provincia Dacia, and this is meaningful. The territory of Transylvania was incorporated into the Grand Principality of Hungary when the Hungarians conquered it in the 9th century. Before that it was our relative's and ancestor's the Avar's before that it was our direct ancestor's the Hun's. Since 4th AD. In the time when you vlachs did not even exist. Then as a territorial entity, It was first established by Hungarians as a dukedom in the 11th century mentioned by Colomon I. Later it was reestablished as a Voivode by Hungarians, keep in mind that it was ruled by Hungarians as well. With ethnicly Hungarian majority It stayed as a Voivode until 1570-1711 when it was reestablished by Hungarians as the Hungarian Principality of Transylvania. Stayed like this until royan Hungary "conquered" it and recognized it as the integral part of of the kingdom of Hungary. Wich means it was the property of the Crown of Hungary. Then in 1867 it was made it official fully integrated into Hungary again. Up until 1920 when it was given to other by the Entente. So yes it was always Hungary since the 4th century up until the 20th century and it will be again but this time forever and without the migrant thieves. There is no rumanian burials no archelogical evidence no architects no documents no place names simply nothing wich would prove the presence of the rumanians in Transylvania before the 13th century. They are not dacians at all they are a two different ethnicites. Meaning they are falsyfying history that's why they got Transylvania unrightfully 103.000 km2 land for 2.8 million rumanis while Hungary was left with a 98.000 km2 for 10 million. It's injustice not even mentioning the countless unhumane atrocities the Hungarians had to suffer in Transylvania. The truth is there was a native population(Huns) living for thousand of years in their own established sovereign state wich at some point became under an alien rule wich settled a lot of migrants into the natives country. While the natives being genocided expelled sparsing them. Until at some point in history the migrants became so many that in some regions they've became majority. Then WW1 happened an opportunity for these migrants to claim the land of the natives as their own. Therefore to get those lands they made up history for themeselves claiming that they were there first and the natives are the invaders. Because they were siding with the winners of course everyone belived them. Until now… A TREACHOROUS LYING FALSE NATION, DO NOT TRUST THEM NEVER THEY STOLE THE HUNGARIAN'S LANDS AND FALSIFYING HISTORY! Soon the truth will be published everywhere, then finally it will be known by the masses, then the full revision can start rightfully. Because it will be proven that the nations who are currently owning the former territories established and owned by the Hungarian nation are holding it with FALSE RIGHTS based on FAKE HISTORY and INJUSTICE making the FULL REVISION OF HUNGARY A RIGHTFUL MUST OF JUSTIFICATION for the atrocities the Hungarians had to suffer unrightfully. By primitive barbarian nations motivated by greed and jeaoulsy. While punishing the history falsifyier sinner murderer thieves expelling them from Hungary to where they were settled some centuries ago! There will be Justice and Punishment when the time of judgment finally comes! Transylvania was always and will be Hungarian again until the end times! Hungarians conquered the basin numerous times, i mean they have a LOT of experience of conquer. The thief nations are rightfully frustrated and afraid because of insecurity by the above mentioned capabilities of the Hungarians. A nation built on fake foundations are nation until the truth prevail… and Hungary is the on built on the true foundation. Good luck thieves resisting the soon coming wrath of the Huns!
@@gigachad3457 The Hungarians were there first in fact the Hungarians are there since the 4th. century AD. the first vlachs were settled there by the Hungarians in the 13th century according to archeology and historiography therfore factually true. Do not believe the rumanians they are deliberately lying! Because of their frustration from being subordinate people, because their past is nothing compared to the great Hungarian nation's, and they want it to be like that proud and ancient, but they can't reach that moral level, that's why they liethemselves, to put their feeble minds in the false comfort zone of being a someone cool relevant. While in reality they aren't. This is pure human greed the degen*ration and dec*y of human morality. No wonder, because living in the shadow of one of the most influential, beautiful and one of the most ancient cultural nations of Central Europe as simple vassals with an irrelevant past as illiterate stateless sheepherders with a lack of honor and decency is frustrating. They don't really have own history that’s their problem. No wonder why they are trying to steal other's and they are learning more false Hungarian history in their history ed. than theirs. Vlachs first settled in Cumania(wallachia) after Bulgaria around the 12th century. They were a migratory transhumance illiterate sheperd people.They got civilized first by the Bulgars. They originated from Albania their language is so similar it's almost identical and their homeless ancestors are still living in Albania. Their migration happened in small migrations. The voivodship of Litovo made the first attempts to unite the anointings and voivodships along the Zil. In 1279 he no longer recognized his subordinate status, so the Hungarian king sent armies against him. Before the establishment of Wallachoa they were already subjugated by the Hungarians. The Litovo voivode was killed in the battle, and his brother, Bărbat, was taken prisoner of war. To replace it, the Hungarian king asked for a huge sum this subjugation lasted for the end of the 14th century and In the early 15th in 1417, Wallachia was forced to accept the suzerainty of the Ottoman Empire this lasted until the 19th century, with brief periods of Russian occupation between 1768 and 1854. From Moldovia is a Hungarian established state in the 14th century and a vassal of the Huns until the 16th century. With short periods of temporary independence. In 1538 Moldavia was vassal of the Ottomans to 1774 and from 1774 to 1918 was the vassal of Russia. That’s where their frustration comes from because of having no own history almost. They are truly suffering from inferiority complex. About the vlach vile lies he modern scientific results refute this outdated theory based on Medieval phantasies (created more than 1000 years after the relevant events) and modern myth-building. The ancient Romans reported that they exterminated the Dacians of the conquered territories, and free Dacians left it, and the territory was populated by settlers from the empire. Thus, Dacians were never Romanised. And later the population of Provincia Dacia was emptied by that empire and was invaded by Goths and other groups, no Dacians were reported later in territory or Romania. Romanians have no Dacian myths or historical memories, they never called themselves Dacians, and nobody called them Dacians. The Hungarian contemporary documents did not report any Dacians/Romanians before the 13th century, but they report their immigration after this era, and this is in line with other historical sources and the results of modern linguistic and genetics. Romanians absolutely do not use any ancient Dacian / Roman settlement names, they use Hungarian and Slavic toponyms in the territory of the Provincia Dacia, and this is meaningful. They dpn't have dacian folklor we have Hunnic and Scythian folklore and cultural heritage as well. They don't have "gestas" tales of their alleged dacian ancestors we have of our Hunnic and Scythian ancestry. They know only about dacia as everyone else the universally accepted studies. Wich is proving that history is not theirs. They don't feel dacian, We feel Scytho-Hunnic! The territory of Transylvania was incorporated into the Grand Principality of Hungary when the Hungarians conquered it in the 9th century. Before that it was our relative's and ancestor's the Avar's before that it was our direct ancestor's the Hun's. Since 4th AD. In the time when you vlachs did not even exist. Then as a territorial entity, It was first established by Hungarians as a dukedom in the 11th century mentioned by Colomon I. Later it was reestablished as a Voivode by Hungarians, keep in mind that it was ruled by Hungarians as well. With ethnicly Hungarian majority It stayed as a Voivode until 1570-1711 when it was reestablished by Hungarians as the Hungarian Principality of Transylvania. Stayed like this until royan Hungary "conquered" it and recognized it as the integral part of of the kingdom of Hungary. Wich means it was the property of the Crown of Hungary. Then in 1867 it was made it official fully integrated into Hungary again. Up until 1920 when it was given to other by the Entente. So yes it was always Hungary since the 4th century up until the 20th century and it will be again but this time forever and without the migrant thieves. There is no rumanian burials no archelogical evidence no architects no documents no place names simply nothing wich would prove the presence of the rumanians in Transylvania before the 13th century. They are not dacians at all they are a two different ethnicites. Meaning they are falsyfying history that's why they got Transylvania unrightfully 103.000 km2 land for 2.8 million rumanis while Hungary was left with a 98.000 km2 for 10 million. It's injustice not even mentioning the countless unhumane atrocities the Hungarians had to suffer in Transylvania. The truth is there was a native population(Huns) living for thousand of years in their own established sovereign state wich at some point became under an alien rule wich settled a lot of migrants into the natives country. While the natives being genocided expelled sparsing them. Until at some point in history the migrants became so many that in some regions they've became majority. Then WW1 happened an opportunity for these migrants to claim the land of the natives as their own. Therefore to get those lands they made up history for themeselves claiming that they were there first and the natives are the invaders. Because they were siding with the winners of course everyone belived them. Until now… A TREACHOROUS LYING FALSE NATION, DO NOT TRUST THEM NEVER THEY STOLE THE HUNGARIAN'S LANDS AND FALSIFYING HISTORY! Soon the truth will be published everywhere, then finally it will be known by the masses, then the full revision can start rightfully. Because it will be proven that the nations who are currently owning the former territories established and owned by the Hungarian nation are holding it with FALSE RIGHTS based on FAKE HISTORY and INJUSTICE making the FULL REVISION OF HUNGARY A RIGHTFUL MUST OF JUSTIFICATION for the atrocities the Hungarians had to suffer unrightfully. By primitive barbarian nations motivated by greed and jeaoulsy. While punishing the history falsifyier sinner murderer thieves expelling them from Hungary to where they were settled some centuries ago! There will be Justice and Punishment when the time of judgment finally comes! Transylvania was always and will be Hungarian again until the end times! Hungarians conquered the basin numerous times, i mean they have a LOT of experience of conquer. The thief nations are rightfully frustrated and afraid because of insecurity by the above mentioned capabilities of the Hungarians. A nation built on fake foundations are nation until the truth prevail… and Hungary is the on built on the true foundation. Good luck thieves resisting the soon coming wrath of the Huns!
@@sghxcy I think he didn’t include it since at that point Hungary wasn’t really “independent” but under complete Austrian rule until the creation of the duel monarchy
Very nice vid, esoecially the beginning....yes we started from the Ural mountains and migrated to the west, its accurate. But after that there were some mistakes. If we had a common king with Poland its not part of Hungary...same with the Italian part...if we attacked a neighbour or just went to an offensive into Serbia or Bulgaria (against the ottomans) you dont have to color it as part of Hungary....same with Wallachia Moldova and so on....those territories were never part of Hungary, there were some minor territorial changes since the 10.th century till 1920, mainly the personal union with Croatia, the rest "mainland" was always the same, except when the ottomans took 80% of Hungary. You mentioned that with zero Hungary :D there were the western and upper part that still existed and the ruler was the habsburgs, but it wasnt the part of Austria, just the king was the habsburg emperor, so it was still called Hungarian Kingdom.
You missed the Royal Hungary 1541 - 1687, than the Hungarian Kingdom 1687 - 1949 under Habsburg dinasty, but allways separate from Austria with own parliement and capita - Pozsony, than Buda - and different official language: latin until 1844, than hungarian. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Hungary_(1526%E2%80%931867)
Sorry, the accuracy is far cry from the reality. First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
2:07 😂😂😂 that is wrong my dear ! The great migration of magyars was NOT on that line that you show in the middle of Carpatian mountains , in reallity it was from very Nord of Carpatian
Nem jól mutatja a térkép. A magyar nép nem egy időben és egy helyen jött létre. De más népek története is úgy van nagy részt kitalálva. Sok forrásból kaptam információt, az igazság nagyjából az lehet, amit itt írtam. De teljesen biztosat akkor sem tudok, legfeljebb igazabbat a történelemkönyveknél. rendszerreform.blogspot.com/2023/09/kettos-honfoglalas-magyarsag-tortenete.html
First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
It was just a false theory that the Hungarians all came here from Asia in 895! Archaeologists and archaeogeneticists have already proven with thousands of data that at least the European Scythians came from ancient European cultures like Baden, Corded Ware culture and Iamnaia culture, which apparently did not speak an Indo-European language. Historian Dr. Barnabás Csaba Horváth undertook to synthesize all of this by combining the latest genetic and statistical data with the generally recognized results of archeology and historical linguistics. She published these data in scientific journals, so prehistorians already know them, but this information has not yet reached the general public. Dr. Csaba Barnabás Horváth says what quite a few researchers have already stated based on the data: "The Iranian nature of the Scythians is a banal error or the result of mixing. The population mixed with the Scythians from the Iranian territory, whom we know today as Sarmatians, may have been of Iranian language and origin." "But the Scythian population was never of Iranian origin. The Scythian and Saramatian populations were originally two separate populations, as they are today the Hungarian peoples and the Slavic peoples." The essence of the research is that the Scythians may have evolved from populations originating from the territory of today's Ukraine, in BC. In the 1st millennium BC, they could have spoken the ancestor of the Hungarian language in the areas stretching from the Danube to the Volga. From this area B.C. Around 3000, a large-scale population movement started in the north and east. The former reached the Scandinavian peninsula, the Arctic Ocean (today's Estonians and Finns are their descendants), the latter BC. Moving further east around 2000, the steppe only reached the western part of Mongolia. It is an important fact that this migration coincides with the separation of the Ugric (Scythian-Urog) and Finno-Permian languages within the Finno-Ugric language family. Csaba Horváth believes: "The Scythian culture grew out of the eastern offshoot of the Eastern European population, the ethnic group that still spoke the languages of the Proto-Scythian Ugric branch of the Finno-Ugric people and settled on the steppes." So, the ancestors of the Hungarians not only migrated and came into contact with the Scythians, they were European Scythians themselves! Even Strabo and Ptolemy already wrote a lot about the royal Scythians (Basileio Scythians: βασιλειοι σκυθαι) who called themselves ourgoi (ουργοι), urogi (υρογι) and who lived here from the Carpathian basin to In the steppe areas of the Black Sea in the west - in the north, all the way to the Volga in the east! That is why Jordanes wrote in the "Getica" in the sixth century that the Hunugors, also called Sabirs, first lived in Scythia and Dacia, and then again in Scythia. Jordanes describes in the 28th chapter that the Goths come to Scythia, and in the 29th book he writes that the population here is the people of Magog, who belong to the Scythians and speak the language of the Scythians! In chapter 33, he mentions that the Gepids arrived in Western Scythia and describes that there are two large rivers here, the Danube and the Tisia -Tisa. These ancient authors wrote that the Urgo - Ugrian - Hunugor - Sabir - Magors are all the same European Scythian peoples! Magog's name is already in the Bible, and the Hungarian chroniclers mention Magog or Magor as the ancestor of the Hungarians! Anonymous also mentions, for example, that the Scythians were named after Magog, who we now call Mogyeri - Magyars. In ancient times, several people wrote that the Isteros - Ister - Danube flows from Western Scythia, or that in the west the Isteros - Danube and the Pathissus - Tisa flow through the land of the Scythians! But the anti-Hungarian linguists also keep silent about the fact that the Scythian river names mentioned in ancient times such as Borystenes - Boristene, Tanais - Tanyai, Ister - Isten, Tisia -Tisza, Maris - Maros, Samus - Somos, Tamis - Temes, Krisos - Körös, Alutus - Alot - Olt, Sieratos - Szeret and so on, can only be interpreted logically and in relation to water in Hungarian or in Proto-Hungarian!
My discord sever for viewers: discord.gg/6qNHxTu
HUNGAyRIANS NEED TO MIGRATE BACK TO THEIR TRUE HOMELAND IN WESTERN SIBERIA AND ENJOY RULE OF RUSSIA WHICH THEY LOVE SO MUCH HERE INSTEAD OF ANNOYING THEIR NEIGHBOURS WITH TERRITORIAL CLAIMS AND EU WITH THEIR VETOING.
Hungary has always been a major player in European history. They are warriors with roots from Central Asia, where brave people stem from..
Thanks from Hungary 🇭🇺
Ural*
I am a proud romanian, but I always liked hungarians, lovely people and very nice culture. We can live in peace, brothers!
Based Romanian 🇹🇷❤️🇭🇺❤🇷🇴 Love from Turkey
NATO's first
secretary general, Hastings "Pug"
Ismay, famously declared that the
organization's mission was "to keep the
Russians out, the Americans in, and the
Germans down."
NATO's mission has not changed in the
more than seventy years since 1952
when the organisation founded to
oppose the Soviet Union.
The Soviet Union fell apart more than
thirty years ago, and Russia is not the
Soviet Union of old, and left Eastern
Europe voluntarily leaving NATO without
a mission, and yet the U.S. occupation
forces remained in Germany consistent
with the original NATO mission
statement mentioned above?
Russian President VIladimir Putin has
claimed that he once raised the possibility of Russia joining NATO with
then-President Bill Clinton, and that
Clinton said he had "no objection."
America remains as committed as ever
to keeping the Germans down and
preventing Europe from becoming a
peer competitor by sabotaging
Germany's burgeoning economic
co-operation and partnership with
Russia, which would have benefited all
of us, and this was most vividly
demonstrated by the destruction of
Nordstream by the U.S., effectively an
act of war on Germany.
The war in Ukraine was supposed to
accomplish two American foreign
policy objectives, the first being to bring
Russia to its knees economically and
the second being to weaken Germany
and Europe. Whilst the U.S. has failed abjectly in
achieving the first objective, the EU
appears to be trapped in a death spiral
with industry now unable to rely on
cheap energy from Russia relocating
out of Germany and the EU while
America profits from substituting it's
own more expensive gas and it's
insatiable Military Industrial Complex
earning bilions from supplying new
arms and ammunition to Ukraine and to
replenish depleted European stocks.
Yes but are some hungaryans brain parrarel wich Say (TRaNsIIlVVaniA iS HunGaaRy💅💅💅💅💅💅💅🇭🇺🇭🇺🗣️🗣️)
❤
W
I have always liked Hungary very much, to be part of a place as picturesque as Europe, it knows very well how to stand out, both its language, culture and traditions that are maintained and the contrast with the Modernity is fascinating to me, many greetings Hungarian brothers, they have left their mark on history, greetings from Mexico 🇭🇺❤️🇲🇽
Thanks 🇭🇺❤🇲🇽
Thanks 🇭🇺❤️🇲🇽
Thanks
Thanks
Köszi😁🇭🇺
I am a simple Polish men, I see Hungary in the title, so I'm click.
Greetings from Poland brothers 🇵🇱❤🇭🇺
🇵🇱💪🇭🇺🇵🇱💪🇭🇺🇵🇱💪🇭🇺🇵🇱💪🇭🇺🇵🇱💪🇭🇺
Brothers, ha ha, they came and devide
Slavs in south and north...
@@ruleofpeacepriests6911So what? Slavs are migrated to the balkans and no one asked them to so🤣🤣😭
Source:en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slavic_migrations_to_the_Balkans
@@1feriii1excellent, thank you!
@@ruleofpeacepriests6911 oops, slavs were not in the Area when the Magyars came and settled on the land, it was actually uninhabited.
Respect our Hungarian Brothers and Sisters From Georgia 🇬🇪♥️🇭🇺
🇭🇺♥️🇬🇪😊😘
🇭🇺🇬🇪❤️ scythian brothers
С каких пор чёрные и венгры стали братьями? 🤣
Csak azért jöttem ide, hogy elmondjam, szeretlek magyar testvérek 🇭🇺❤️🇵🇱
🇭🇺♥️🇵🇱
Mi is titeket! 🤝
🇭🇺❤️🔥🇵🇱
Kocham Polskę z Węgier
🇭🇺❤️🇵🇱
I NEVER heard of old hungaries before, and i was quite interested in Hungary for some time! This video is incredible!
But you have to understand good. We only speak since 895 about the Hungarian State not earlier. But I find the video good.
@@tiborfarkas5180 This video is a TRASH! First of all the creator os separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
yeah because they didnt exist
@@fabiApologeticscigány, 1859 ROMAnia founded 😂
@@J-IK By ur logic germany has short history bc Germany was founded in 1871 , ur not smart at all asian
Respect from Slovakia. I am proud of our 1000 years old history 🇸🇰❤️🇭🇺
I think you are also descendants of the Scythians or Sarmatians, just like the Ugors - Hungarians and the Magors - Magyars, only you spoke a more Sarmatian-Slavic language! For example, the ruling class of the medieval Poles knew very well that they were once Sarmatians! Nowadays, many people dispute that the Slavic languages and peoples could be related to the Sarmatians or possibly the Scythians, and based on genetic and linguistic research, the roots of the Slavic peoples go back to the Iranian Sarmatians, since after the Scythians, the Sarmatians conquered and ruled the entire Eastern Europe, all the way to the Huns! Based on the archaeological research, the Sarmatians completely switched over to the Huns, but when the elite tribes of the Huns retreated to the east after the death of Atilla, the descendants of the Sarmatians remained here. And then this also explains why the Ugric Scythian language was limited to only one narrow area, the Carpathian basin! Anyway, as far as I know, the Slovak language has many words related to the Hungarian language, which would prove a long coexistence in the kingdom of Hungary, but maybe also a relationship between the peoples and the languages of Scythians and Sarmatians!
@@szakaattila7899szlovák = Magyar + Czech
Wow you are the only Slovak , who is proud of that . Massive respect to both nations !
From CZ . Hajrá Mátyás király! I am.proud he was our king too.
@@J-IKSlovak=Slavic, magyar= mongolian + turk. 😉😜
@@mareqg4849 Then why would us fought against tatars(mongols) at 13th century? and how many famous rulers have you had? oh w8 nothin' xdd
Finally someone who knows what personal union is 🇭🇷🇭🇺
@@martinm3594 slavonia and zagreb were under hungarian influence, but southern than river sava croatia was fully independent, croatian nobles were totally free there, they had their money, they had their army, their cities and most important they could do whatever they wanted without king's permission. I know that in 1102 to 1527 we were in personal union and yes kings were rulers but these nobels were free and hungarians never established strong rule there, it was some kind of commowealth
Praise our mutual hero Zrinski/Zrínyi
🇭🇷🤝🇭🇺⚔️🇹🇷
1566
Glory to the Brave
@@ffarkasm he literally saved europe
@@swordfish_wotb2249 So there was autonomy?
@@Artuuur_005 not autonomy, equal rights to both nations
I like hungary soo much 🇭🇺❤️🇵🇱
🇭🇺💪🇵🇱
Kawał dobrej roboty, no i aż grzech nie napisać: Polak, Węgier, dwa bratanki, i do szabli i do szklanki ✌🏻
+1
🤣😂😝🤪= polish hungarian race connection -> sarmatians ! = only two kurva exist in europe = magyar + lengyel , the dwa bratanki + firewater : wodka + pálinka ! = 😏🤪
No w ostatnim czasie to trochę niekoniecznie.
I have never seen such a good and elaborate video about the history of the Hungarians. I don't know the history of the Hungarians so much that I can tell where there is a flaw in it, but there was something I missed about it. I especially liked the prehistoric part and it looks like you spent a lot of time making it!
He spent more than 2 months
Péter Szilágyi, "such a good and elaborate video of the history of the Hungarians"..????? Teljesen elmentek otthonról? This video is a TRASH! First of all the creator os separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
Toto video je zavadzajuce.
Look the details, the pixels, the investigation about each country history, the time to search for information. MAN!!!! You're the ruler of history channels. 👍👍👍👍👍
Far cry hard from that: First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
Don't let the details fool you, that doesn’t mean it's true.
As a Pole I must watch this.
The most detailed history of Hungary ever
detailed but he forget the turan and hun(garian) empire that conquered Rome
@SuperduperobergruppenstuppentruppensturmStuka romanian
@SuperduperobergruppenstuppentruppensturmStuka It's troll edition. :)
Not really, the author ignored hundreds of years! First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
@@sghxcy only a real mapper knows hoe hard mapping is. Trust me.
This is an incredible video. The amount of time and dedication that you put into this is remarkable, thank you so much for making these videos!
Incredible poor video. First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
Clar si concis. Nomazi, fara legatura cu vreun neam european, pusi pe japca pana in zilele noastre. Istoria, cea mai importanta stiinta si dovada a legitimitatilor natiunilor. Bravo!
Sunt ca un cui în mijlocul Europei. Cuiul care va face mereu rău celorlalte popoare, la umbra URSULUI din est. In realitate au fost mereu in umbra Austriei sau Rusiei. Ungaria Mare nu a existat ! Din păcate lobyul lor este ascultat mai ales în America. Minciunile ridicate la rang de adevăr.... O minciună repetată la infinit ajunge sa fie percepută că adevăr daca nu este contracarată cu argumente de adevărații istorici.
Shaightly frustrated. Saying you know things.
Romanian 🤔🤔
Nici nu-ţi dai seama că de fapt vorbeşti despre "Mioriţa", singura baladă originală despre etnogeneza reală a unui popor de păstori şi oieri nomazi din Balcani!
@@Ταργιτάος1 Fiecare popor are Miorita lui. Invidia, crima din invidie este peste tot.
Oh man,making all those exclaves and enclaves must have been hard,and I am not even going to go into detail how terrible must have been making the fragmentation of Hungary in the 1300s.
Anyways, amazing video and you'e got a new subscriber here.
The ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
Fantastic video, thank you for also portraying my country Croatia accurately! Greetings from Croatia and love to Hungarians
Love Hungary from Greece!
Constantinople is Greek.
Respect to hungary from Romania. 🇹🇩 🤝🇭🇺
5:11 "yep... that's me. You probably wonder how I ended up in this situation"
?
Super film!!! Nie moge sie doczekac historii Czarnogóry!!
Lol
haha
Not really, ethusiastic, but poor work: First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
@@sghxcy angry hungarian😡🇭🇺
@@srpskahentai9782 Sorry, teh mistakes are annoying really, despite the intention of the aker was surely good.
It is a general missunderstanding that the kingdom of Hungary doesn't exist under the rule of the Habsburgs. Each of them are crowned kings, Hungarian parliament functions.
Correct opinion, compared to Bohemia and Moravia, Hungary was more free. Nevertheless, the author did not describe it badly in the video, between 1700 and 1867 there was little Hungarian state, although you wrote it the emperor was legally the Hungarian king. Without a background grinder incineration, the video is not completely understanded.
I love Hungary, their history is amazing! 🇺🇸🤝🇭🇺
Here from Romania, Hungary is beautiful, but if I catch a scallywag say Transylvania is Hungary I might just die
It's not. Everything is destroyed and only city there's Budapest.
Yes love hungary from Poland
🇵🇱❤️🇭🇺
I am a person who is going to study abroad in Hungary. I was so impressed that Hungary has a very long history and roots from Asia. Thank you for sharing this.
That's like going to any other Balkan country, because there's no difference.
Long live hungary.(Yes I'm from hungary)
Based.
Love from your Turkic brothers!
🇹🇷🇭🇺
A very impressive piece of work, no doubt one which took a great deal of effort. There are a few minor errors on the Bulgarian border. For example, Darman and Kudelin resisted Hungarian rule in Braničevo from 1273-1291/1294, while Jacob Svetoslav's claim to the Bulgarian throne as a Hungarian vassal from 1266-1273 is not shown. Regardless, the attention put to small details is quite notable, good!
And few major errors as well: First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
Love Hungary 🇭🇺 from Czechia 🇨🇿
You know, sometimes being different is fun. In America, while diversity may not be a strength per se, it makes life interesting.
Hungary represents some of the best of Europe despite the people not being “truly European”. Architecture, art, climate and culture is very preservationist and traditional. But the crazy language and history keeps you on your toes.
Presented an interesting dilemma some years ago when I found out they used Eastern Naming and I had been calling a cute lady by her first name for a long time haha.
Also: Based Hungary. 🇺🇸❤️🇭🇺
Many of today Hungarians are European, since they're mostly Croats, who fled to Hungary from Ottomans and were magyarized.
Love Hungary from Greece! 🇬🇷🇭🇺
Love to Hungary from Bulgaria
Nice music
Also this is a great video (Hungary has one of the best histories in my opinion)
Great video with full of mistakes. First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
😃I am impressed with this video about Hungarian lands 🇭🇺. And you started the video from the time when Hungarians lived near the Urals, before they settled in Pannonia. And the second thing I have noticed since the 90s is showing Hungarian prime ministers 9:34 , not presidents. Katalin Novák has been the current head of state in Hungary since this month, but Prime Minister Viktor Orban is in fact taking over most of power. I wonder why he never ran for president 🤔
he doesnt ad turan (house of all turks hungarians finns and mongols) and Hunnic empire (we conqiered romanians and take rome)
Prime Minister and President are two different things. Also, despite what everyone says, I believe if Orbán wouldn't run for the position with highest power, FIDESZ MAYBE(!) wouldn't have supermajority (Although so many ppl hate Gyurcsány, who can be seen as the leader of the opposition, that maybe they's have that anyways)
Hungary is a parliamental republic, where the Head of State (aka the President) has only symbolical power. The first leader is the Head of Government (aka the Prime Minister). But the video shows Miklós Horthy, the Head of State (Regent) for the Kingdom of Hungary, and then also shows the Presidents for People's Republic of Hungary. But in those times, the Head of the Communist party was the highest power, and not the President. It should have shown Rákosi as leader from 1947 until 1956, then Kádár from 1956 until 1989. Even thought its still an amazing video!
@@ancienthunnicempire-hungar241 stop larping as an oriental. youre just as european as your average french or pole
The video is impressively mistaken. First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
Légy áldott Magyarország ❤
Can you please tell me, what's the name of the first music in this video?
iirc it's Gergelytánc, this one specifically: th-cam.com/video/NVfL0Nw0eVU/w-d-xo.html
@@Enist1XD THANKS A LOT!
Sad about Hungary’s population is going down.
After Mohacs (1526) there was no "Eastern Hungary". While Western Hungary belonged to the Austrians and Central Hungary became an Ottoman province, for about 170 years Transylvania was an autonomous state formation, under the suzerainty of the Ottoman Empire, first as the Principality of Erdel, then the Principality of Transylvania. Turkish historiography recorded this fact, correctly naming the respective state formation which had its own leadership.
After Mohacs, there were the kingdom of hungary, called eastern Hungary, and the kingdom of hungary, the royal hungary.
@@xerxen100 tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Osmanl%C4%B1_%C4%B0mparatorlu%C4%9Fu#/media/Dosya:OttomanEmpireIn1683.png
@@xerxen100 or Tót imperium :)
9:15 that small land in north🏃🏻♀🏃🏻♀🏃🏻♀🏃🏻♀
(I hope you understand what I'm writing because I'm translating this with Google Translate because I don't know English yet)
Hi! I am Hungarian, I live in Slovakia because of the Trianon peace dictatorship signed 102 years ago. This video got really good, just keep going!
CsabiTube, megnézted te rendesen ezt a videót? First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
@Defender of Flop Ok, i understand, but this does not mean we should ignore crucial mistakes; in fact when the goal is the biggest accuracy. So now he has the chance to correct it.
Not slovak, but calling it dictatorship is ridiculious. How is it dictatorship, If a culture living on a certain territory where they are a majority, gets their own country? It makes no sense. Hungarians were oppresors of Many cultures under their territory(which arrived before the hungarians) yet they still act like they are the victims. Absolutely Shameless. Trianon was fair
Western or eastern?
Wow this is insane, as i expected! You make it very well mate, and earn a new subscriber! My only problem is, you dont make Ajtony's Principality, but hey, everything else is amazing. Thank you!
First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
@@sghxcy we know, this is not perfect, but still the best one at the moment, so i guess we need to appreciate his work. Am I wrong?
@@olymonusolymonus2637 Yes, there are better demonstrations which don't erase hundreds of years....
I'm Hungarian!✌ Thanks, for this video
What are you planning doing next?
you should do a bulgarian history video. the two nations have a lot in common
Yeah,thieves and stealers of others territories..
@@ruleofpeacepriests6911 didnt every nation start like that?
@@evreiskimason No, some were the first settlers after ice age..
I am a Greek and i have to say. Greece. Bulgaria. Serbia an Hungary have a lot in common. We all lost our nearby land. And we all want it back. Especially as Greeks want Northern Epirus and Constantinople.
@@ruleofpeacepriests6911
You say that of hungary? You are talking crap
just tripping.A feel you uncivilized.
Don't be frustrated.
I'm sorry for watching your video late, great video
Już wiem że to kawał dobrej roboty
Could you provide a link to song 1? I can't find it anywhere but it slaps! Thanks in advance
th-cam.com/video/NVfL0Nw0eVU/w-d-xo.html here's the song, thank me later
a bit late, but th-cam.com/video/NVfL0Nw0eVU/w-d-xo.html
It is interesting how Magyars inhabited in the steppes of modern Ukraine. I never knew about Levedia and Etelkoz formations. Thanks a lot from 🇺🇦
Hungarians have owned that territory for a long time, but now the Hungarians living there are oppressed by the 🇺🇦 government & can’t speak their language in schools.
@@schutzanzug4518 You are obviuosly Russian bot because nowadays Hungarians do not live in the steppes of Ukraine (they live in Transcarpathian region). And Hungarians can speak their language free in Ukraine but they also must know the state (Ukrainian) language (as well as in every state of Europe children of ethnic minorities learn the state language at school). So it is pure propaganda that Hungarian children are prohibited to speak or to learn Hungarian at Hungarian schools in Ukraine.
@@TheOlgaSasha there is a minority of Hungarians that live there. Go do your own research, but Hungarian gatherings have been raided on camera for no apparent reason, Ukraine has been pressuring minorities for a while, and get this, 80% of the population of Carpathia wanted autonomy or independence, after the breakup of the Soviet Union when they were now apart of Ukraine.
Of course the Ukraine never has given them autonomy, still, along with all of the other people Ukraine oppresses, like the Russians.
if you don't like living in Ukraine, then you should return back to your real homeland, and not spread the propaganda of idea of being a separate country
as simple as that
But of course, you'll ignore my comment, because you won't find a counterarguement against the truth@@schutzanzug4518
@@TheOlgaSashaTheir cruel minority laws have brought the separatists upon themselves. They have only themselves to blame for what happened, as the Russians there did not want to secede in the first place.
A lot of Turkic tribes assimilated into Hungarian society.
The word Hungary in Latin is derived from the Turkish language, which means the land of the Huns
@@muhammadmahdikarimi12No, Hun in Hungary is releated with Onogurs not Huns
Bardzo dobra robota. Naprawde gościu, podziwiam cię za to. Jesteś chyba jednym z najbardziej dokładnych kanałów na youtubie. nie wiem czy nie zacząc podobnego kontentu do ciebie bo mapping nie ma sensu. Pozdrawiam.
Zavadzajuce video.madari prisly na velku moravu a ziadna hungaria tu nebola.ako polak by si to mal vediet kedze sliezko a vislansko boli sucast miravy
What!? I didn't know how strange the Caspian sea used to look back then
It is true that the Hungarians are a part of the Turko-Mongol family
No
igen
no
💀💀💀
Good video, really well made, I just don't get why you dignuti depict Habsburg-controlled Hungary and Croatia from 1527 up until the Austro-Hungarian Treaty, but other than that really a great job man.
First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
După Mohacs (1526) nu a mai existat ”Eastern Hungary”. În timp ce Vestul Ungariei era la austrieci iar Ungaria Centrală a devenit provincie otomană, timp de circa 170 de ani aproximativ actuala Transilvanie a fost formațiune statală autonomă, sub suzeranitatea Imperiului Otoman, mai întâi cu numele de Principatul Erdel, apoi Principatul Transilvaniei -cum corect prezentați. Istoriografia turcească (și nu doar ea!) a consemnat acest fapt, denumind corect respectiva formațiune statală, care avea conducere proprie.
Correct. Dar scrie si in engleza, sa se vada adevarul , nu mai sta nimeni sa dea google translate din romana. Ungurii in general imprastie falsurile in engleza ca sa le inteleaga toti si cat mai multi.
@@cllaudiusd521 Mă conformez. :)
@Gőzpöfögészeti Tovalöködönc how pitiful to be a mongol peasant getting f by gypsies lol
@Tovalokodonc Can you learn other languages and not make fun of people? Or just translate it atleast? How pitiful. Plus, you expect people to know thousands of languages at once, right?
So there was no Hungary between 1600 and 1800? Only Transylvania?
There was, just the author is ignorant. Further mistakes: First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
Köszönjük szépen 🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺♥️
Azt is megköszönöd hogy eltüntette magyarországot néhány száz évre?
@@sghxcy te tényleg nem értetted meg amit írtam a köszönéssel. Kicsit gondold át
@@atillakrisztian8023 Én értem, csak azt nem hogy miért nem nézted meg figyelmesen a videót. Még ha a szándék nemes is volt, igazából munició a magyarellenes propagandistáknak :/
@@sghxcy tisztában vagyok vele DE a propagáláson kívül mire mennek? Semmire
Ha nagyon lépnének meg tették volna de egyik sem veszi bátorságát hozzá
@@atillakrisztian8023 Ezért kellünk mi legalább, meg hogy legyünk többen. Nem adhatjuk fel.
Üdvözlet Magyarországról Oroszországból. Minden jót kívánok Magyarországnak. Minden rendben legyen veled.
From ural mountain to europe🗿
Greetings & love from Türkiye. I know we had many wars in the past but the Hungarians are great warriors and were always worthy opponents. 🇹🇷❤️🇭🇺
4:46 there as not only Jászság. There was Kunság else
2:05= csak egy pillanatra ? 894 , Miért ? És mi érthető a kék vonal bejelöléssel ?
We Romanians may not get along too well with Hungarians because of historical and ethnical reasons but relations had improved somehow and a lot of mixed marriages between those two are proofs we get along pretty well.
Agree with but we must stay vigilant. Magyar irredenta is a reality.
Well, you're both mixed with Roma, so yes, you're coming together :D
Great video.. I have a few questions, if Hungarians came from Central Asia, why is the language so similar to Estonian and Finnish, and why do they look Northern European? Thanks for your amazing work and you have a new subscriber here! 🙂
The Hungarian language is related to the Finnish and Estonian languages but practically unintelligible (like other languages). They are part of the Finno-Ugric group. It looks like a European population because their nomadic ancestors were not very numerous, they conquered the Pannonian space and others only militarily and later linguistically not ethnically. The Hungarian kingdom in general throughout its history has been a small "empire" of many ethnic groups (Hungarians, Cumans, Romanians, Slavs, Germans, etc.). The nomadic population has been reduced in battle over time and has mixed with the majority native population of the Carpathian Basin, so it looks like Europeans .
Because in central Asia there was white europeans lived. The Hunnic invasian, and the others too just a retreat, because mongolid races become too strong. Interestingly, some of the Attilas hunnic wariors have balkanic genes. Their burial found in nowadays Mongolia.
@@xerxen100Are the Hungarians the remnants of the Huns, who were a group of Turkic descent who came from Central Asia to Europe in the fourth century AD under the command of A.T.I.L.A. They did not come to Europe
@@muhammadmahdikarimi12 Partially. The ruler elite were certainly the remnants of Attila and his Huns. The commoners were mixed aboriginals, slavs, Avars, germans, vikings, semitic peoples, turks, Iranians and many more. But the core were always the Huns, till the 16th century, after that and nowadays the Jews rule Hungary.
You missed the Hungarian Kingdom under Habsburg rule: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Hungary#Middle_Ages
" Although the borders shifted frequently during this period, the three parts can be identified, more or less, as follows:
Royal Hungary, which consisted of northern and western territories where Ferdinand I was recognized as king of Hungary. This part is viewed as defining the continuity of the Kingdom of Hungary. The territory along with Ottoman Hungary suffered greatly from the nearly constant wars taking place.
Ottoman Hungary: The Great Alföld (i.e. most of present-day Hungary, including south-eastern Transdanubia and the Banat), partly without north-eastern present-day Hungary.
Eastern Hungarian Kingdom under the Szapolyai. Note that this territory, often under Ottoman influence, was different from Transylvania proper and included various other territories sometimes referred to as Partium. Later the entity was called Principality of Transylvania."
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Hungary_(1526%E2%80%931867)
upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/52/Central_europe_1572.png
Na végre valaki észrevette, amit a többség nem. Amatőr hibák vannak ebben a videóban.
@@sghxcy Na ja. És minden egyes ilyen hungarian history videónál ezt elrontják... Csak nem tudom, hogy miért mert eléggé egyértelmű, hogy létezett Magyarország Habsburg uralom alatt...
@@tibi7402 Azért mert a sok képzetlen, műveletlen ember keveri a Habsburg "Birodalmat" Ausztriával, holott maga a Habsburg Birodalom is csak azon területek összessége volt ahol Habsburg uralkodó volt, nem volt egy ország stb. Nem képesek felfogni...
Pozdrowienia dla Braci Węgrów!
Im realy loved it! What's the first music called?
I have not started watching it but i know it’ll be a masterpiece
First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
Just to correct some mistakes if you dont mind.
Its not Zoltán. He was Zolta which is now Zsolt.
Zołta means yellow in Góral dialekt. Anyway, you're Polish like me.
Thanks for video/ hu❤rus
We are all from ancient turan but hungarians where creators of this empire
In 1183 Hungary took Bulgaria's modern day capital Sofia witch is something you forgot to include
Respect Hungarian history from Bulgaria.
🇧🇬🤝🏻🇭🇺
Hunsunuz
Greetings from Türkiye to our Hunnic brothers. Hajra Turan! 🇭🇺 🇹🇷
Well the video has a lot of work that i respect, but there was a lot miss information.
Well three are many issues with this map, still one of the better maps made so far.
- many inadvertences about the conquest period, for example the fact that between 899-950 the Italian Kingdom, between 919-933 the Eastern Frankish Kingdom (future Germany), between 926-934 the Provence duchy, between 934-959 the Byzantine empire paid tribute to the Hungarians was not shown,
- the conquests in upper Hungary of Gábor Bethlen and I. Gyorgy Rákóczi not shown at all,
- between 1526-1848, 1849-1867 Hungary did not disappeared. The Hungarian kingdom did not disappeared in these centuries, the Habsburg emperors were crowned Hungarian kings, Hungary having its own Diet, laws, army, etc. Queen Maria Tereza had to beg the Hungarian Diet to send the Hungarian troops to help her against Friedrich the Great. Hungary did not disappeared, it existed as kingdom, and the Habsburgs were its kings. Yes, it was not a totally free region, but still had an important autonomy, and Hungarian statehood, as kingdom did not disappeared... You shown the different autonomous regions in Hungary before 1526, but you did not shown Hungary, when it became an autonomous region herself. Better to say much more than an autonomous region.
- You did not shown the Rákóczi freedom war from 1703-1711 at all.
And it were some other smaller issues too.
All Hungary videos show principality of transylvania
this is the best Hungary video because it has comparatively less mistakes than other videos although this video has few mistakes
This video is absolutely false. During the Ottoman invasion, the Royal Hungarian Kingdom still existed, under Habsburg influence.
What are you making next
A very good video !!! , but with small corrections. After the battle of Mohacs (1526) there was no Eastern Hungary, it was called only Transylvania and was a multiethnic state (Romanians-majority , Hungarians, Germans, Szeklers, Slavs, etc.), suzerain state of the Ottoman Empire and sometimes independent and which concluded treaties with other European countries on an equal footing. And the current area of Transylvania was gradually conquered in about 150 years, not in 50 years after the arrival of the Hungarian tribes led by Arpad - as it appears in the video.
"After the battle of Mohacs (1526) there was no Eastern Hungary" No, there was eastern Hungarian kingdom. Its later renamed to Transylvania, when the Habsburg set an agreement with the hungarian king about the reunification of Hungary under habsburg rule.
@@xerxen100you're right, it was called eastern Hungary at first, but only because the nobility was hungarian. Most of the population was romanian, as they are native to that land
could you make canada next, my homeland ?
@драза михаиловић are u that dude from the balkan video? hi then how you been doing?
Canada has history? LOL.
@Sanacja 🇮🇱 lol.
I will say that the Szekely and Saxon land remained separate from proper Hungarian counties until 1876, so I believe those should've still been included up until then.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Counties_of_Hungary_(1000%E2%80%931920)#Modernised_counties_(1867%E2%80%931920)
Modernised Counties - Paragraph 2, 3, 4
Also, the military frontiers were not abolished until 1881, and the military frontiers essentially acted as marches (otherwise called margravate, marquis, etcetera),
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_(territory)#Habsburg_Empire
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_Frontier
so I believe those should fit the definition of vassal, and should be included as well, regardless of if Habsburg Hungary is not shown in its entirety.
If this conflicted with what you read, feel free to disregard it, but thank you very much for this video again!
You're right. Those parts were leaded separately. By Transylvanian leaders (Fejedelem)
We conquered rome!
Not, the Germans did it not you
@@pidorjobanij Where do you know that?
@@botiabonyi
In the summer of the year 410, Visigoths from Eastern Europe ended a three-day sack of the city of Rome (now the capital of Italy).
This was the first time Rome had been defeated in nearly 800 years.
As for the Visigoths themselves: they were an early Germanic people who, along with the Ostrogoths, constituted the two major political entities of the Goths within the Roman Empire in late antiquity, or what is known as the Migration Period.
So early Eastern Germanic Tribes, and not the Hungarians.
And if you still need more clarity on the subject, you can feel free to google the history of the fall of the Roman Empire yourself.
There was no such thing as Barbarian invasions.
You weren't even in Europe. You're not Huns, forget about it. :D
Awesome video! What are you sources for the Hungarian conquest of Transylvania in the 900’s from Bulgaria? There are many conflicting sources and it is not well documented, but I know you are meticulous with your work going as far to use medieval border stones
Its after a Major battle won by Hungary, bulgarian Historian told me to show it like that because dates are disputed.
@@POGKPP
Thank you!
@@POGKPP
As a final question, what is the state of “Gyepú” supposed to represent as Transylvania is disputed till 936?
No historical source says they conquered Transilvania from Bulgaria, idk what have u been smoking but its nit good for your health, Hungarian sources speak of a man named Gelou as the Ruler of Transilvania, Glad in Banat and Menumorut in Parthium/Crisana, and after Gelou was defeated by the magyar chieftain Tuhutum his son Went to banat where he resisted the magyar conquest for some more time, and then Gyla/Iuliu the 1st up to Gyula/Iuliu the 3rd were probably the descendants of Ahtum, or not, by this time the magyar sources tend to differ,
I only used Hungarian sources for my statement, in case I m acused of Bias or something.
@@stefansmith4372 Gyeppu is something as a Buffer land, like the Marches of the Frankish empire,
As you can clearly see. They werent in Transylvania from the beginning
Why romanians and hungarians are arguing over this land explain please
@@gigachad3457 Transylvania is a region in the center of Romania (between the Carpathians). The first civilization that got here is uncertain. Some people say that scythians were here first, or they lived near Transylvania, not IN Transylvania. The most plausible and logical civilization that got here first are the dacians. Dacians are a thracian tribe that had the capital at Sarmizegetusa Regia (between the Apuseni and the Southerner Mountains). It is said that these guys had a good technology for the time, they had kind of a good armor and arms, but also, the agricultural tech was impressively well developed. Then the romans conquered Dacia, and founded the cities that still exist: Apulum (Alba Iulia/Gyula Fehervar/Alba Julia), Potaissa (Turda/Torda) and Porolissum (Zalau). The romans really struggled to take over the region, as the dacians won the first battles (102-103), but the romans finally made it in 105-106. There is also a rumor that Transylvania was so rich in gold, that when the romans discovered these gold mines, the roman penny got 2 times bigger (it was made of gold, obviously). And now starts the romanization of Dacia. You might know already that we are a latin-speaking countrry (I am talking about Romania). There are a lot of events, that, either I dont know, or are too complicated, so I m gonna oversimplify this a little. After the roman fell, a lot of tribes moved here (slavs, bulgarians, goths, germans and ofc, hungarians). Well, we were influenced by the slavs, and we still have a lot of slavic words and with this combination of slavs, romans and dacians, we got to the point where the nationality known as vlach (romanian) was created. We were spread all over the place from Tisa to the Nistru river. And now comes the most controversial part, the hungarians. I ve spoke to a lot of hungarians about this subject, and their opinion is so biased that I cant say they re version of the story bc I didnt understand anything =)). Anyways, they came from behind the Urals mountains, as you saw in the vid. While they were still a nomad state, we were already here, in Transylvania. When they got here, they even recognised the fact that here are already people, different people, and these people in Transylvania, were led by some slavic and vlach origin people: Litovoi, Menumorut and Gelu/Gelou. They were killed by hungarians and they became the leaders of Transylvania now. This is how the "beautiful" hungarian-romanian relations started.
In the 1600 s, vlachs started to question about Transylvania and the Union of romanians, so Mihai Viteazu (Michael the Brave) united all these (Moldova, Transylvania and Vallachia) after the ottomans took Buda and Pest, but this lasted for just a couple of months when the polish sided the corrupt puppet of Moldova and the hungarians so it all failed.
As you already understood, the dacians and romans are ancestors of ours (just to make an end)
@@gigachad3457 TRANSYLVANIA WAS ESTABLISHED BY HUNGARIANS
TRANSYLVANIA WAS NAMED BY THE HUNGARIANS
TRANSYLVANIA WAS INHABITED BY HUNGARIANS FOR THE LONGEST TIME OF IT'S TODAY ETHNICITIES.
TRANSYLVANIA WAS INHABITED BY THE HUNGARIANS FROM THE OLDEST TIMES MAKING THEM THE MOST NATIVE OF THEIR LANDS.
TRANSYLVANIA WAS WAS OWNED BY THE HUNGARIANS FOR THE LONGEST TIME.
TRANSYLVANIA WAS RULED BY THE HUNGARIANS FOR THE LONGEST TIME.
TRANSYLVANIA WAS MANAGED AND BUILT BY THE HUNGARIANS MAINLY, FOR THE LONGEST TIME.
THAT’S WHY IT LOOKS NOTHING LIKE vlachia AND moldova
BECAUSE 🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺TRANSYLVANIA IS IN FACT HUNGARIAN! 🇭🇺🇭🇺🇭🇺
INHABITED BY THIEF CUCKOOS YET..
WE SETTLED THE ILLITERATE PRIMITIVE VLACHS INTO TRANSYLVANIA IN THE 13TH CENTURY AND WE'RE GONNA EXPELL THEM FROM THERE RIGHTFULLY AS WELL! AFTER WE RETOOK IT BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY. WE CONQUERED THE CHARPATIAN BASIN IT IS RIGHTFULLY ONLY HUNGARIAN NONE OF THOSE THIEVES CONQUERED ANYTHING FROM HUNGARY.
@@gigachad3457 Do not believe the vile rumanians they are deliberately lying! Their identity is false. Unfortunately they believe those tales and treat them as fact. Because most of their identity is based on baseless Hungarophobia, because of their frustration from being a lesser ethnicity, because their past is nothing compared to the great Hungarian nation's, and they want it to be so proud and ancient, but they can't reach that moral level, that's why they lie to themselves. to put their undeveloped minds in a comfort zone. This is pure human greed the degeneration and decay of human morality. No wonder, because living in the shadow of one of the most influential, beautiful and one of the most ancient cultural nations of Central Europe as simple vassals with an irrelevant past as illiterate homeless sheepherders with a lack of honor and decency. They don't really have own history that’s their problem. No wonder why they are trying to steal other's and they are learning more false Hungarian history in their history ed. than theirs. Vlachs first settled in Cumania(wallachia) after Bulgaria around the 12th century. They were a migratory transhumance illiterate sheperd people.They got civilized first by the Bulgars. They originated from Albania their language is so similar it's almost identical and their homeless ancestors are still living in Albania. Their migration happened in small migrations. The voivodship of Litovo made the first attempts to unite the anointings and voivodships along the Zil. In 1279 he no longer recognized his subordinate status, so the Hungarian king sent armies against him. Before the establishment of Wallachoa they were already subjugated by the Hungarians. The Litovo voivode was killed in the battle, and his brother, Bărbat, was taken prisoner of war. To replace it, the Hungarian king asked for a huge sum this subjugation lasted for the end of the 14th century and In the early 15th in 1417, Wallachia was forced to accept the suzerainty of the Ottoman Empire this lasted until the 19th century, with brief periods of Russian occupation between 1768 and 1854. From Moldovia is a Hungarian established state in the 14th century and a vassal of the Huns until the 16th century. With short periods of temporary independence. In 1538 Moldavia was vassal of the Ottomans to 1774 and from 1774 to 1918 was the vassal of Russia. That’s where their frustration comes from because of having no own history almost. They are truly suffering from inferiority complex.
About the vlach vile lies he modern scientific results refute this outdated theory based on Medieval phantasies (created more than 1000 years after the relevant events) and modern myth-building. The ancient Romans reported that they exterminated the Dacians of the conquered territories, and free Dacians left it, and the territory was populated by settlers from the empire. Thus, Dacians were never Romanised. And later the population of Provincia Dacia was emptied by that empire and was invaded by Goths and other groups, no Dacians were reported later in territory or Romania. Romanians have no Dacian myths or historical memories, they never called themselves Dacians, and nobody called them Dacians. The Hungarian contemporary documents did not report any Dacians/Romanians before the 13th century, but they report their immigration after this era, and this is in line with other historical sources and the results of modern linguistic and genetics. Romanians absolutely do not use any ancient Dacian / Roman settlement names, they use Hungarian and Slavic toponyms in the territory of the Provincia Dacia, and this is meaningful.
The territory of Transylvania was incorporated into the Grand Principality of Hungary when the Hungarians conquered it in the 9th century. Before that it was our relative's and ancestor's the Avar's before that it was our direct ancestor's the Hun's. Since 4th AD. In the time when you vlachs did not even exist. Then as a territorial entity, It was first established by Hungarians as a dukedom in the 11th century mentioned by Colomon I. Later it was reestablished as a Voivode by Hungarians, keep in mind that it was ruled by Hungarians as well. With ethnicly Hungarian majority It stayed as a Voivode until 1570-1711 when it was reestablished by Hungarians as the Hungarian Principality of Transylvania. Stayed like this until royan Hungary "conquered" it and recognized it as the integral part of of the kingdom of Hungary. Wich means it was the property of the Crown of Hungary. Then in 1867 it was made it official fully integrated into Hungary again. Up until 1920 when it was given to other by the Entente. So yes it was always Hungary since the 4th century up until the 20th century and it will be again but this time forever and without the migrant thieves.
There is no rumanian burials no archelogical evidence no architects no documents no place names simply nothing wich would prove the presence of the rumanians in Transylvania before the 13th century. They are not dacians at all they are a two different ethnicites. Meaning they are falsyfying history that's why they got Transylvania unrightfully 103.000 km2 land for 2.8 million rumanis while Hungary was left with a 98.000 km2 for 10 million. It's injustice not even mentioning the countless unhumane atrocities the Hungarians had to suffer in Transylvania.
The truth is there was a native population(Huns) living for thousand of years in their own established sovereign state wich at some point became under an alien rule wich settled a lot of migrants into the natives country. While the natives being genocided expelled sparsing them. Until at some point in history the migrants became so many that in some regions they've became majority. Then WW1 happened an opportunity for these migrants to claim the land of the natives as their own. Therefore to get those lands they made up history for themeselves claiming that they were there first and the natives are the invaders. Because they were siding with the winners of course everyone belived them. Until now…
A TREACHOROUS LYING FALSE NATION, DO NOT TRUST THEM NEVER THEY STOLE THE HUNGARIAN'S LANDS AND FALSIFYING HISTORY!
Soon the truth will be published everywhere, then finally it will be known by the masses, then the full revision can start rightfully. Because it will be proven that the nations who are currently owning the former territories established and owned by the Hungarian nation are holding it with FALSE RIGHTS based on FAKE HISTORY and INJUSTICE making the FULL REVISION OF HUNGARY A RIGHTFUL MUST OF JUSTIFICATION for the atrocities the Hungarians had to suffer unrightfully. By primitive barbarian nations motivated by greed and jeaoulsy. While punishing the history falsifyier sinner murderer thieves expelling them from Hungary to where they were settled some centuries ago!
There will be Justice and Punishment when the time of judgment finally comes!
Transylvania was always and will be Hungarian again until the end times! Hungarians conquered the basin numerous times, i mean they have a LOT of experience of conquer. The thief nations are rightfully frustrated and afraid because of insecurity by the above mentioned capabilities of the Hungarians.
A nation built on fake foundations are nation until the truth prevail…
and Hungary is the on built on the true foundation. Good luck thieves resisting the soon coming wrath of the Huns!
@@gigachad3457 The Hungarians were there first in fact the Hungarians are there since the 4th. century AD. the first vlachs were settled there by the Hungarians in the 13th century according to archeology and historiography therfore factually true.
Do not believe the rumanians they are deliberately lying! Because of their frustration from being subordinate people, because their past is nothing compared to the great Hungarian nation's, and they want it to be like that proud and ancient, but they can't reach that moral level, that's why they liethemselves, to put their feeble minds in the false comfort zone of being a someone cool relevant. While in reality they aren't. This is pure human greed the degen*ration and dec*y of human morality. No wonder, because living in the shadow of one of the most influential, beautiful and one of the most ancient cultural nations of Central Europe as simple vassals with an irrelevant past as illiterate stateless sheepherders with a lack of honor and decency is frustrating. They don't really have own history that’s their problem. No wonder why they are trying to steal other's and they are learning more false Hungarian history in their history ed. than theirs. Vlachs first settled in Cumania(wallachia) after Bulgaria around the 12th century. They were a migratory transhumance illiterate sheperd people.They got civilized first by the Bulgars. They originated from Albania their language is so similar it's almost identical and their homeless ancestors are still living in Albania. Their migration happened in small migrations. The voivodship of Litovo made the first attempts to unite the anointings and voivodships along the Zil. In 1279 he no longer recognized his subordinate status, so the Hungarian king sent armies against him. Before the establishment of Wallachoa they were already subjugated by the Hungarians. The Litovo voivode was killed in the battle, and his brother, Bărbat, was taken prisoner of war. To replace it, the Hungarian king asked for a huge sum this subjugation lasted for the end of the 14th century and In the early 15th in 1417, Wallachia was forced to accept the suzerainty of the Ottoman Empire this lasted until the 19th century, with brief periods of Russian occupation between 1768 and 1854. From Moldovia is a Hungarian established state in the 14th century and a vassal of the Huns until the 16th century. With short periods of temporary independence. In 1538 Moldavia was vassal of the Ottomans to 1774 and from 1774 to 1918 was the vassal of Russia. That’s where their frustration comes from because of having no own history almost. They are truly suffering from inferiority complex.
About the vlach vile lies he modern scientific results refute this outdated theory based on Medieval phantasies (created more than 1000 years after the relevant events) and modern myth-building. The ancient Romans reported that they exterminated the Dacians of the conquered territories, and free Dacians left it, and the territory was populated by settlers from the empire. Thus, Dacians were never Romanised. And later the population of Provincia Dacia was emptied by that empire and was invaded by Goths and other groups, no Dacians were reported later in territory or Romania. Romanians have no Dacian myths or historical memories, they never called themselves Dacians, and nobody called them Dacians. The Hungarian contemporary documents did not report any Dacians/Romanians before the 13th century, but they report their immigration after this era, and this is in line with other historical sources and the results of modern linguistic and genetics. Romanians absolutely do not use any ancient Dacian / Roman settlement names, they use Hungarian and Slavic toponyms in the territory of the Provincia Dacia, and this is meaningful. They dpn't have dacian folklor we have Hunnic and Scythian folklore and cultural heritage as well. They don't have "gestas" tales of their alleged dacian ancestors we have of our Hunnic and Scythian ancestry. They know only about dacia as everyone else the universally accepted studies. Wich is proving that history is not theirs. They don't feel dacian, We feel Scytho-Hunnic!
The territory of Transylvania was incorporated into the Grand Principality of Hungary when the Hungarians conquered it in the 9th century. Before that it was our relative's and ancestor's the Avar's before that it was our direct ancestor's the Hun's. Since 4th AD. In the time when you vlachs did not even exist. Then as a territorial entity, It was first established by Hungarians as a dukedom in the 11th century mentioned by Colomon I. Later it was reestablished as a Voivode by Hungarians, keep in mind that it was ruled by Hungarians as well. With ethnicly Hungarian majority It stayed as a Voivode until 1570-1711 when it was reestablished by Hungarians as the Hungarian Principality of Transylvania. Stayed like this until royan Hungary "conquered" it and recognized it as the integral part of of the kingdom of Hungary. Wich means it was the property of the Crown of Hungary. Then in 1867 it was made it official fully integrated into Hungary again. Up until 1920 when it was given to other by the Entente. So yes it was always Hungary since the 4th century up until the 20th century and it will be again but this time forever and without the migrant thieves.
There is no rumanian burials no archelogical evidence no architects no documents no place names simply nothing wich would prove the presence of the rumanians in Transylvania before the 13th century. They are not dacians at all they are a two different ethnicites. Meaning they are falsyfying history that's why they got Transylvania unrightfully 103.000 km2 land for 2.8 million rumanis while Hungary was left with a 98.000 km2 for 10 million. It's injustice not even mentioning the countless unhumane atrocities the Hungarians had to suffer in Transylvania.
The truth is there was a native population(Huns) living for thousand of years in their own established sovereign state wich at some point became under an alien rule wich settled a lot of migrants into the natives country. While the natives being genocided expelled sparsing them. Until at some point in history the migrants became so many that in some regions they've became majority. Then WW1 happened an opportunity for these migrants to claim the land of the natives as their own. Therefore to get those lands they made up history for themeselves claiming that they were there first and the natives are the invaders. Because they were siding with the winners of course everyone belived them. Until now…
A TREACHOROUS LYING FALSE NATION, DO NOT TRUST THEM NEVER THEY STOLE THE HUNGARIAN'S LANDS AND FALSIFYING HISTORY!
Soon the truth will be published everywhere, then finally it will be known by the masses, then the full revision can start rightfully. Because it will be proven that the nations who are currently owning the former territories established and owned by the Hungarian nation are holding it with FALSE RIGHTS based on FAKE HISTORY and INJUSTICE making the FULL REVISION OF HUNGARY A RIGHTFUL MUST OF JUSTIFICATION for the atrocities the Hungarians had to suffer unrightfully. By primitive barbarian nations motivated by greed and jeaoulsy. While punishing the history falsifyier sinner murderer thieves expelling them from Hungary to where they were settled some centuries ago!
There will be Justice and Punishment when the time of judgment finally comes!
Transylvania was always and will be Hungarian again until the end times! Hungarians conquered the basin numerous times, i mean they have a LOT of experience of conquer. The thief nations are rightfully frustrated and afraid because of insecurity by the above mentioned capabilities of the Hungarians.
A nation built on fake foundations are nation until the truth prevail…
and Hungary is the on built on the true foundation. Good luck thieves resisting the soon coming wrath of the Huns!
what's the name of the first song
Apparently the Huns were in Asia, right?
Yes.500 years before.
Yeah but haplogroup research shows that highes % is of slavs - even bigger than some neighbouring slav countries...
0:00 - 5:46 "Csángó folk music"
what the name the music?
idk
👍🇹🇷🇭🇺.
Hungary and turkey are not friends
@@magyar2896brother
Beautiful presentation for those who dont know history. Great job!
Ervin, és az oké hogy 1711-1867-ig eltüntette Magyországot a térképről? Miért kell félrevezetni az embereket?
@@sghxcy I think he didn’t include it since at that point Hungary wasn’t really “independent” but under complete Austrian rule until the creation of the duel monarchy
Very nice vid, esoecially the beginning....yes we started from the Ural mountains and migrated to the west, its accurate. But after that there were some mistakes. If we had a common king with Poland its not part of Hungary...same with the Italian part...if we attacked a neighbour or just went to an offensive into Serbia or Bulgaria (against the ottomans) you dont have to color it as part of Hungary....same with Wallachia Moldova and so on....those territories were never part of Hungary, there were some minor territorial changes since the 10.th century till 1920, mainly the personal union with Croatia, the rest "mainland" was always the same, except when the ottomans took 80% of Hungary. You mentioned that with zero Hungary :D there were the western and upper part that still existed and the ruler was the habsburgs, but it wasnt the part of Austria, just the king was the habsburg emperor, so it was still called Hungarian Kingdom.
Severin/banatul de_=A Szöre'nyi ba'nsa'g...sze'p video,köszönöm sze'pen,üdvözülök!!!
You missed the Royal Hungary 1541 - 1687, than the Hungarian Kingdom 1687 - 1949 under Habsburg dinasty, but allways separate from Austria with own parliement and capita - Pozsony, than Buda - and different official language: latin until 1844, than hungarian.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kingdom_of_Hungary_(1526%E2%80%931867)
Great video, especially the accuracy about Croatia👏🇭🇷🇭🇺
Sorry, the accuracy is far cry from the reality. First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
@Anhedon No, it's not about who I like or not, it's about accuracy. Then it was Máramaros.
@Anhedon you must be really bored
@Anhedon Panonia would be part of Romania? Drunken?
why did the population decrease by half in 1050s?
Because of the Mongols
2:07 😂😂😂 that is wrong my dear ! The great migration of magyars was NOT on that line that you show in the middle of Carpatian mountains , in reallity it was from very Nord of Carpatian
Nem jól mutatja a térkép. A magyar nép nem egy időben és egy helyen jött létre. De más népek története is úgy van nagy részt kitalálva. Sok forrásból kaptam információt, az igazság nagyjából az lehet, amit itt írtam. De teljesen biztosat akkor sem tudok, legfeljebb igazabbat a történelemkönyveknél.
rendszerreform.blogspot.com/2023/09/kettos-honfoglalas-magyarsag-tortenete.html
You made mistakes about Croatia.You see,Croatia,Slavonia and Dalmatia were separate for centuries.Today they are under the name Croatia.
True. Tito was good, united
Simply amazing!
Oh, hello there)
@@justpetrushka sup ;)
no
First of all the creator is separating Máramaros from Hungary in the 11th century, which is fake. On the other hand around the 15 century, he is deleting parts of Transylvania which was as well in fact part of Hungary. But the greatest mistake is the ignorant author is erasing the Kingdom of Hungary from 1526 onwards, even erasing the Principality of Transylvania a few times from 1600 onwards, but completely erasing Hungary from 1711 until 1848, and from 1849-1867, that is just ridicoulus, Hungary existed all the time. Poor work, no subscribe!
It was just a false theory that the Hungarians all came here from Asia in 895!
Archaeologists and archaeogeneticists have already proven with thousands of data that at least the European Scythians came from ancient European cultures like Baden, Corded Ware culture and Iamnaia culture, which apparently did not speak an Indo-European language. Historian Dr. Barnabás Csaba Horváth undertook to synthesize all of this by combining the latest genetic and statistical data with the generally recognized results of archeology and historical linguistics. She published these data in scientific journals, so prehistorians already know them, but this information has not yet reached the general public. Dr. Csaba Barnabás Horváth says what quite a few researchers have already stated based on the data: "The Iranian nature of the Scythians is a banal error or the result of mixing. The population mixed with the Scythians from the Iranian territory, whom we know today as Sarmatians, may have been of Iranian language and origin." "But the Scythian population was never of Iranian origin. The Scythian and Saramatian populations were originally two separate populations, as they are today the Hungarian peoples and the Slavic peoples."
The essence of the research is that the Scythians may have evolved from populations originating from the territory of today's Ukraine, in BC. In the 1st millennium BC, they could have spoken the ancestor of the Hungarian language in the areas stretching from the Danube to the Volga. From this area B.C. Around 3000, a large-scale population movement started in the north and east. The former reached the Scandinavian peninsula, the Arctic Ocean (today's Estonians and Finns are their descendants), the latter BC. Moving further east around 2000, the steppe only reached the western part of Mongolia.
It is an important fact that this migration coincides with the separation of the Ugric (Scythian-Urog) and Finno-Permian languages within the Finno-Ugric language family. Csaba Horváth believes:
"The Scythian culture grew out of the eastern offshoot of the Eastern European population, the ethnic group that still spoke the languages of the Proto-Scythian Ugric branch of the Finno-Ugric people and settled on the steppes."
So, the ancestors of the Hungarians not only migrated and came into contact with the Scythians, they were European Scythians themselves! Even Strabo and Ptolemy already wrote a lot about the royal Scythians (Basileio Scythians: βασιλειοι σκυθαι) who called themselves ourgoi (ουργοι), urogi (υρογι) and who lived here from the Carpathian basin to In the steppe areas of the Black Sea in the west - in the north, all the way to the Volga in the east! That is why Jordanes wrote in the "Getica" in the sixth century that the Hunugors, also called Sabirs, first lived in Scythia and Dacia, and then again in Scythia. Jordanes describes in the 28th chapter that the Goths come to Scythia, and in the 29th book he writes that the population here is the people of Magog, who belong to the Scythians and speak the language of the Scythians!
In chapter 33, he mentions that the Gepids arrived in Western Scythia and describes that there are two large rivers here, the Danube and the Tisia -Tisa. These ancient authors wrote that the Urgo - Ugrian - Hunugor - Sabir - Magors are all the same European Scythian peoples! Magog's name is already in the Bible, and the Hungarian chroniclers mention Magog or Magor as the ancestor of the Hungarians! Anonymous also mentions, for example, that the Scythians were named after Magog, who we now call Mogyeri - Magyars.
In ancient times, several people wrote that the Isteros - Ister - Danube flows from Western Scythia, or that in the west the Isteros - Danube and the Pathissus - Tisa flow through the land of the Scythians! But the anti-Hungarian linguists also keep silent about the fact that the Scythian river names mentioned in ancient times such as Borystenes - Boristene, Tanais - Tanyai, Ister - Isten, Tisia -Tisza, Maris - Maros, Samus - Somos, Tamis - Temes, Krisos - Körös, Alutus - Alot - Olt, Sieratos - Szeret and so on, can only be interpreted logically and in relation to water in Hungarian or in Proto-Hungarian!
Áldjon téged a magyarok Istene!
@@janosapponyi4072 Köszönöm! Isten áldjon meg minden magyart!
Wow, this seems interesting, how is it not talked about more?