Larsen vs Hawaiian Kingdom
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ต.ค. 2024
- Keanu Sai has a Ph.D. in Political Science and teaches at Windward Community College. He represented the Hawaiian Kingdom, as its Agent, before the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, Netherlands, a case involving claims by Lance Larsen that the Hawaiian Government was negligent by allowing American laws to be imposed in the Hawaiian Kingdom. On Law Across the Sea, Mark and Dr. Sai discuss this case, its history, its meaning, its ramifications, and its current status.
ThinkTech Hawaii streams live on the Internet from 11:00 am to 5:00 pm every weekday afternoon, Hawaii Time, then streaming earlier shows through the night. Check us out any time for great content and great community.
Our vision is to be a leader in shaping a more vital and thriving Hawaii as the foundation for future generations. Our mission is to be the leading digital media platform raising pubic awareness and promoting civic engagement in Hawaii.
we will forever be grateful to Dr. David Keanu Sai for his continued education to all across the globe.
Brilliant!
Thats my 1st cousin Lance Larsen
He also is one of the smartest mechanic on the planet he had some of the fastest cars growing up
. . . Apart from the subject and dialog, I find it weird
that the background image has trees twice as tall
behind 25-story buildings - is this the stereotype
dream image of tourist expectations?
The TRUTH will set us free
Staying Strong.
The Hawaiian Kingdom does exist! Proof of this fact is evidenced by acceptance of the Hawaiian Kingdom as an independent state in the World Court, the Hague. The U.S. was invited to attend the proceedings, but they did not. Why didn't the U. S. show up at the Hague with their evidence to prove the overthrow was legal and the Newland's Resolution annexed the Hawaiian Kingdom to the U.S.?
This guy is carrying your mantel
Robin Can not explain zero
US also annexed the Republic of Texas by joint resolution as well. Is Texas not a state?
Dr. Sai is being very disingenuous about what happened at the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA ) in the Hague.
1.) In it's written award or ruling the PCA never stated the Hawaiian Kingdom continues to exist until present day. Instead it states that the Hawaiian Kingdom "EXISTED" in the nineteenth century and goes onto to say that "Joint Resolution No. 55 was passed by the United States House of Representatives and Senate to provide for the annexation of the Hawaiian Islands to the United States." Don't believe me? Anyone can read the official record here: pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/123
2.) Dr. Sai states in his lecture that the PCA would not have agreed to hear the case if the international court didn't recognize the Hawaiian Kingdom as a current sovereign nation. WRONG again. The PCA hears cases brought by private parties as well as nations. Here is an excerpt from the history section of the official PCA website "Today the PCA provides services for the resolution of disputes involving various combinations of states, state entities, intergovernmental organizations, and PRIVATE PARTIES." Also, just Hearing a case doesn't equate to recognition.
3.) The PCA award itself was a failure for Dr. Sai and the Larsen case. Here is the official "Award" as the PCA calls it:
"For the reasons stated above, the Tribunal determines as a matter of international law, which it is directed to apply by Article 3 (1) of the Arbitration Agreement:
(a) that there is no dispute between the parties capable of submission to
arbitration, and
(b) that, in any event, the Tribunal is precluded from the consideration of the
issues raised by the parties by reason of the fact that the United States of
America is not a party to the proceedings and has not consented to them.
Accordingly, the Tribunal finds that these arbitral proceedings are not maintainable.
"
Dr. Sai is preying on people's ignorance by counting on the fact that nobody will take a deeper look at the Larsen Vs. Hawaiian Kingdom case. The whole thing was a failure, legally speaking anyway.
Nobody will be prosecuted for war crimes in this issue. the US does not participate in the International Criminal Court or the PCA as many other countries do not for various reasons namely that countries with grudges against a particular country would use the international court to punish that country.
Not true, skewed for his desired outcome.
Please explain.
@@KINGSTONSPRIDE I already explained to you pal and sent you the US Supreme Court Ruling of how the Hawaiian Kingdom ceased to exist.
@@Champstarrable The US is not an international body that can determine such a case without bias. That's like a criminal defendant in court also being the judge and jury. Makes no sense whatsoever.
@@shin-ishikiri-no Well the PCA in the Hague also made no determination of the contemporary existence of the Kingdom of Hawaii as well and that ruling has been published and is available for all to see. Additionally the US and many other countries are not bound by PCA or ICC rulings so the SC ruling is the only one that matters legally and their perceived bias asserted by you is only your speculation. Even if they were the PCA did not offer any relief to Dr. Sai in his case. He lost is the SC and in international court.
Give him a casino and tax free booze, he will shut up.