Accident don't happen, they are the result of a chain of events, any one of which if it hadn't happened would have stopped the chain of events from turning into an "accident".
@@PureGlide That's why many Air Forces use the term "mishap" instead of "accident" for a crash, just to reinforce the concept that nothing just happens by accident, but rather as the result of a chain of factors. You may have seen safety posters that say: "No safety, know accident. Know safety, no accident." Cheers from Canada! 😀
Great video, loved how you focus on solutions instead of blame. It's very easy to comment "he was to fast" or "guy was to stressed", but your way of analyzing the multitude of issues present and their possible remedies seems a lot more constructive. It's an approach i think we all could learn from.
Thanks to the pilot for bravely sharing this! Good analysis of what happened and on the mental overload aspect of human performance. I find the situation of under performing due to mental overload rather familiar... currency, practice and proper training is probably the best way to do something about it.
@@dillonbledsoe7680 It is very simple. You share a video like this to the benefit of others knowing that You will also receive a pile of shit from some less considerate individuals.
I guess the guy was scared shitless at having to land out. That is where everything started going wrong. It is understandable at first but you do not go on cross country unless you are comfortable and good at landing in all sorts of situations. He panicked and completely forgot his training and just focused on being on the ground at all cost. That death grip on the control says it all. Glad he did not get hurt.
lol, yeah I just re-watched it and in the video I mentioned he had his right foot in, but that doesn't make sense as he was yawing the other way. So yes not using the rudder I think makes more sense...
My first thoughts too. I can remember when I was first learning to fly gliders I had difficulty keeping myself lined up behind the tow plane. As soon as my instructor told me to use rudder for left/right alignment, elevator for up/ down and to avoid excessive aileron control everything clicked. This advice served me well on all my following takeoffs and landings. There was just way too much left/right stick going on there.
The common mistake is to want to "steer" with the stick and coordinate with the rudder. It's the other way around. Steer with the rudder and adjust the bank for the intended turn. Of course, real coordination is achieved when both control inputs are fed in simultaneously.
As my instructor drummed into me, “a good circuit will make a good landing”, I kinda use it for many scenarios in life. Once they make it easy to get back to NZ I’ll come for a fly.
I am very glad when pilots share situations like this. We can all learn from this. Thanks to the instructor for verbalising and go through the phases. Fly safe out there.
first thing to recommand to novice glider pilots, turn the vario beeper off once you have decided to land, it's a distraction, creates stress and add to mental overload, and it has no whatsoever benefit if you are landing. And as i have seen many times, no proper base is the most efficient way for a terrible landing. Thanks for sharing, requires lot of courage to post such an experience, all the best to the pilot as he probably has saved many people from making the same mistakes.
I am an instructor: From my point of view, the pilot was completely overstressed with a situation he was not prepared for. Simply look to his handling of the stick...
@GracieM That's a bit extreme. If this pilot was recently solo and new in his gliding career, then it's understandable how his performance declines when faced with a stressful situation. He definitely needs more training and experience, but it's not reason to say he should never fly again.
@GracieM maybe go and read what the pilot says under his original video. It's his first landing away from his home strip, he misjudged it and panicked a little too late. He swallowed his ego, admitted his error, and even posted it as an example of what not to do. No one was hurt and he's been pretty humble about it.
@GracieM Actually, it could have been worse, Yes he was anxious and overcontrolled the glider, but he could have tried to stretch the glide to those tempting streets up ahead. He didn't, so that was good decision making. He just needs more tuition. My anxiety got in the way when I was a student, but when I gained confidence I became very competent pilot and was asked to become an instructor. I had very good instructors myself.
Tim, good to see you providing an experienced perspective here. I'm someone who has also cramped his circuit for an outlanding, leading to a half second of pure terror when I realised that I was not going to be able to get into the field in front of me before I decided to land further ahead; across the road & the first field, over the cattle race and into a small triangular field. I crossed the fence at about 2 metres with half spoiler, then pulled full spoiler and full back stick, giving a firm but not too hard arrival. I was stopped within 100 paces from the fence, though there was only a mark from the tail skid for 30 paces. Gliders want to stay in the air! I know, from translating the French "blue book", that they recommend a final of 30 seconds: at least 15 seconds is desirable in my experience. Count one-elephant, two-elephant to see how long your usual final is. As you turn final, pull full spoiler and see if the field rises in your view. If it does, you won't overshoot - but then close the spoilers to whatever level you think appropriate to put you mid-point in the ideal approach cone. The fact the cockpit is structurally intact is no guarantee of no injury to the pilot, as the load is likely to have simply been transferred to the pilot's spine. There is a very useful BGA video (play it at 1.5x speed, as the English presenter talks slowly though accurately), which recommends the use of Confor energy-absorbing foam. I know, Tim, that your club for example has bought some of this foam and uses it for cushions. The presentation is at th-cam.com/video/3z-LfU38lMY/w-d-xo.html The glider should not have been flying, as it was simply not airworthy - something the pilot knew about and had chosen to continue flights with the glider in that condition. "One more thing: stick had at that time an annoying slack of ~2cm, which partially got me into the habit of frantic left-right inputs when I got nervous" I admire the pilot for his openness. He himself says in one of his replies "That clip was almost 7 yrs ago. Long enough distance for my wounded ego to withstand public self-humiliation"
Thank you, Tim - very precious analyse and remarks about this incident we just saw in this video. I hope only that this pilot from this video is feeling well now and was not seriously injured during this hard landing. I wish you and other glider pilots all the best in this soaring season - and to stay high and save in every single flight!
You are right. I have over 700 hrs and the thing pounded into my brain during training and check flights was Rule #1- "Fly the bloody ship" an extension of what you were saying in commentary.
I’m applying to get my license and find your video extremely useful. I discussed this with my instructor who 100% agrees with your analysis about the combination of several factors, “poor training “ / bad estimation/panicking/overrruling the aircraft. Tks for your useful videos and suggestions. Mauro
What helped me prepare for outlandings is lessons in field selection and approaches to random fields in a motorized glider, so you can try something, pull up, do it again, do it again at a different field, continuously. Really helps internalize the lessons.
As a sailing instructor and a Scuba instructor the exact same applies. Agree 100%. I am also a pilot with a few hours of gliding. You are right on. Thanks for the great and instructive video.
Well, I think that one of the main reasons this happened is that he doesn't let the glider fly. He is using very aggressive steering input all the way to the landing and he seems to fight the glider all the time.
True, but what is causing that? Nervousness? Fear? Which is caused by what? Lack of confidence? caused by? lack of training I’d suggest. From the sounds of it this was a number of years ago, so he’s no doubt had more training since.
@@Takiranaaa Landing downwind (even a light tailwind can make a significant difference) and the pilot in the original video stated he also had sloppy control connections - several cm's of play - the build quality on Russia's was quite poor- maybe the reason for his aggresive inputs and uncordinated flying -since attended to when the glider was rebuilt. Why you would fly a glider in that condition I have no idea though .........
Yes exactly often the aircraft would fly more stable in the absence of a pilot who often just makes things worse by making control input for no apparent reason other than to offer the pilot comfort in the delusion he has control. I used to fly free flight gliders. Once trimmed they fly perfect all on their own!
I glide in the UK and we have to have a minimum of a hour every year in a motor-glider practicing field landings and every scenario that could arise, To check for size of the field, shape of the field, slope, crops, cattle and obstructions ie phone poles or power lines. You have to satisfy the CFI before he/she allows you to try cross country.
Very nice commentary. A good, squared off pattern with proper distances from the runway is a skill worth developing. The final leg in the video reminds me of a moment in my glider training. In one instance I was struggling to get out of a poor position on tow which I thought was due to insufficient control authority. I mentioned this to the instructor in the back seat. He explained that he had seen the poor position developing for some time. One needs to develop good planning and habits and not count on being able to manhandle the controls to cover for poor setup. I’m sure that landing wasn’t the pilot’s proudest moment. I’m thankful he posted the video for others to learn from. Hopefully he didn’t get banged up too badly.
We've all been there, at this level of flying! Hopefully there's an instructor in the back to catch it though, and you're own your own when you've past this point! The controls are tricky, and easy to over-react to when learning to fly. Especially when you are stressed like this pilot, it's easy to get the timing a bit wrong. But yes agreed more experienced pilots don't get into bad situations in the first place, with good planning and habits. Cheers for watching!
Side slipping was a pre-War very English method of approach. In that seemingly deserted area I do not know why he did not line up squarely with the strip much earlier on and, given the shortness of the strip, drop down as soon over the threshold as possible.
That was very educational. A good thing that the pilot shared this. This teaches us more about human factors than the actual flying mistakes that were made. When stress takes over rationality, you fall back on your instincts if you lack sufficient experience. Procedures are thrown overboard which were designed to keep you out of trouble. Pilots need to be aware this can happen and recognise it, because it can happen to even very experienced pilots. Easier said than done, I know.
Monday morning quarterbacking is always easy. This looked to me to be a rushed landing. He looked to be forcing the aircraft down, and started a short approach from too high an altitude. Compounding the speed created from being too high and diving to reduce altitude he created even more energy by landing downwind. Maybe he was overloaded mentally due to lack of confidence or fear. The cascade can be fully observed here. I salute this pilot for posting this so the rest of us can learn from his mistakes, and I am glad he wasn't physically injured, although I am sure his psyche took a beating and this likely left a mark for a long time on his confidence.
@Pure Glide It’s worth mentioning the pilots comments in the original video. He said that the ‘controls had 2cm of slack’ which caused him to develop a habit of moving the stick frenetically. In my mind the aircraft is unserviceable in this condition. Add a poorly planned circuit from 750ft Agl, lack of base leg and unexpected tailwind and you get what you see. I applaud the pilot for sharing the video so others learn. It shows how quickly everything can go wrong.
Hmm I'm not quite convinced, even with slop in the stick, and a tail wind, and a small circuit, a well trained or experienced pilot wouldn't land like that. What is common is for a lot of people to find excuses when things go wrong, to avoid blaming themselves and their lack of skill or training. We all do it to some extent. But for aviation it's important to counter it as much as possible. But yes I do agree, we must thank the pilot for sharing so we can all learn from it.
A fair analysis. I remember that in older generation gliders, slowing down was more effective for losing height with poor airbrakes. What type of glider was it and did it have spoilers or airbrakes? I'm just glad that there weren't go-pros and SM when I started. Looking at the sky, it might have been easier to find a thermal and climb away :-) Very good of the pilot to share his mistakes with the rest of us.
I love your commentary and analysis on these accidents. I was surprised that you said that you didn't think that the downwind landing had much influence on the account. Having done a downwind landing myself in a powered aircraft in very light breeze I was surprised at how much it changed the dynamics of the whole maneuver. The aircraft drifted further, tending to float rather than touching down and it burnt up a lot more runway than normal which seemed to be in evidence in this video. It makes me think that it could well be a primary contributing factor to the accident, especially if the pilot was relatively new and inexperienced. I also agree with your comments about inexperience being a factor to consider. A lack of experience would have resulted in an increase in the amount of stress as a result of having to perform the out-landing which might explain why he was overhead the airfield and didn't take into account the windsock direction when choosing the runway. It's almost as if he was so focused on getting the aircraft back onto the ground that he would have done so irrespective of the prevailing conditions and the consequences. My comment are pure speculation and the pilots experience is a great chance for us all to learn from.
Yes you are probably right, even 5 knots tailwind can make a big difference, and may well have been a contributing factor. It'll make the whole thing happen faster and feel much faster. Also being close in won't help with a tail wind, you'll end up too high much more easily. And yes rewatching the video there definitely is some on the windsock. Also ahead in view is a big convergence which is likely sucking. Even if you screw that up though, it shouldn't affect the landing, aiming point and touch down that much.
At my club in the UK we get pilots to do downwind landings in very light winds as part of their training. We emphasise that we are not teaching them land down wind as such, but so they can experience the longer float and relative high ground speed for the airspeed so they are ready for this if they do land downwind deliberately or by accident.
One of my old instructors, often repeated the mantra, "any landing, no matter how bad it seems, that you walk away from is a good one", this bloke was damn lucky to have done that. Everyone had offered their thoughts about what went wrong, so I won't compound the theories by offering my thoughts. I'll just say many years ago, while flying out of Waikerie in South Australia, I saw one of Australia's most experienced gliding instructors do exactly that, walk away from an on-tow crash landing, and it wasn't pretty to watch. The reason this happened was later to be found that a mounting affixed to the elevator had cracked, and broke away from the rest of the fixture, the pilot had no option but to try and land as best he could without the aid of the elevator, and subsequently flat-bottomed to the ground from 200 meters. I know this has nothing to do with the video, I'm just saying any situation can and does arise, and no matter how good or bad you are, you'll often get caught out, unless you let your training take over.
Thanks for the educational video. This reminds me to take up some outlanding instruction on a motorglider, to learn about the visual illusions and field selection.
@@PureGlide Does the instructor need to approve cross-country first? Sorry for all these questions, but I am also a fresh pilot. I'd be sick if I tried cross country without really good landing skills. How do you know if someone is ready for such a trip?
@@jacekpiterow900 If you are new to gliding give yourself the time to work on your skills in flight. Ask your instructors to go a small cross country with you. Watch the video to the end. There Tim tells what to practice beforehand. It is also very good recommendation to vist some known oulanding fields near the airfield. I hadn't an outlanding yet. But i did practice precission landing on different spots of the home airfield. (Military airfiel with 5 gras strips). I also did a good practice flight with an instructor on a new airfield with a glider i have never flown. I sticked a Postit over the altimeter and had to guess the landing pattern.
@@jacekpiterow900 hi good question, I suspect different countries have different rules but here in NZ we generally train people to land in fields before they go too far from the airfield. However saying that anyone who has been taught to land accurately should be able to land off field as well.
@@michaelderflinger5002 Seems reasonable, thanks. Is outlanding also expensive on your airfield? Seems to be premeditated to discourage people from it.
I think he really wanted to hit that point at the end of the runway and totally forgot that direction mattered, too. Not aligning the path over ground with the runway made the situation even more unstructured and harder. He had to change alignment last second and screwed it up because of overwhelm. I suppose alignment was too much effort for him to take care about early and then was even more so in the end. Confusing rudder and aleron function seems a typical panic reaction. I'm not sure if he intended to slip.
Kudos to the pilot for posting this as a lesson to new pilots. I must say I'm a little surprised at his having to land out as the conditions looked quite buoyant - flat bottom cumulus and cloud streets all around. A little more experience should help him avoid the downwind high speed final and tense over-control in the future 👍. Almost had to land out at California City over 30 years ago. Was setting up on final for a dirt road landing when I caught a thermal at 500 feet. I stayed in that thing till I was 10,000 AGL!! Breathed a sigh of relief and made it back easily, thank goodness 😉
Where there is good lift there is also good sink, and earlier pilots just aren't always aware of how to get out of it quickly. In this case there is a big convergence sucking infront of him as he's landing, so that may kill the local thermals around where he was too. Hard to tell from a low resolution video.
In my youth, I also made a few outlandings where it was tbh just a good portion of luck that kept the airplane and me intact. In my opinion, the 4 lessons are: 1. accept at a safe altitude that the flight/flying-day is over and that from this moment on you only have one, but extremely important task: land safely - no more searching for thermals, no more tactical analysis, no more checking the gnns recorder or final glide computer while you take care of the landing 2. don't invent new approach and landing procedures, especially not when landing outside, keep your distance from the landing field and fly as you would at your home airfield 3. approach the runway straight and stable, you need a stable approach, especially if you are under stress. In my opinion, this point is also the core problem in the video. At no time there was a stable approach to the runway, but an angled approach with a half-hearted slip.
I have never flown myself. But it seems he was going waaay too fast. I am going for an ultralight license soon. And i hope to make it as an instructor eventually as well.
at my gliding club we are use cones to set out a landing field to land in, its about 30 by 30 and with in that you need to touch down that's the goal of it. also to be able to control a side slip its a good skill in my opinion. i enjoy a nice side slip time to time to land with you can have so much control while in a side slip. love toe vids and keep it up. would love to fly same day in NZ when able to
There was a tragic glider accident in America a few years ago, I don't know if it's already been analysed in a vid, but it took off under tow with the small trolley under the tail still accidentally attached. The controller on the ground radioed "Abort", so either the glider pilot or tow pilot released the cable and the glider nosed into the ground killing the pilot and a woman passenger and a toddler on her lap. I've not been able to find an accident report to find out exactly what happened.
Thanks for a very good article, it raised many good issues. Thanks to the pilot who bared all so we can learn. His acceptance of fault is a fabulous sign that he can progress to a high standard of flying. He was clearly flummoxed by his situation, being faced with an unavoidable outlanding. He did seem inexperienced but at least chose a good landing place. Landing downwind not only extends the roll distance but can also reverse controls at some point on the ground roll. I hope this pilot continued to fly.
I haven't had an outlanding yet... but damn, if I ever got there and there was an airstrip as beautiful as this under me, I'd probably be as calm as when I am landing on my home airfield.
@@MisterIvyMike yes, in fact, it is ; ) Long story short, me and my friends had this internal joke where everything german is "das" (because we were bad at it and made jokes about it). So yes...
Great video. I am learning a lot about gliding from these videos. One of the smartest people I flew with explained something similar, but they explained it as carrying a bunch of plates or something. When one too many is added you don't just drop one, you can drop them all in a cascade. Fixation is probably more typical in the control aspects you describe, but you covered a close call where a pilot deployed spoilers very close to some trees as they tried to reach the field and that's what came to mind. Even experienced pilots should be careful that as a situation increases in complexity they don't forget to take a breath and focus on what they know, which is fly the glider.
A slip increases drag, _and_ shortens the effective length of the wings, decreasing lift force. In my opinion, you should always use slip and spoilers in landing, and if you are likely not to have someone fly under you in final, start high and come down fast. Excess altitude is never a problem if you have practiced this on every landing. I haven't flown for several years though.
A slip seems like a great idea from higher up when you are tying to reduce speed on approach but it certainly didn't seem like a good idea when he was 10ft from the ground
Yes the spoilers or air brakes on a glider are usually very effective so you shouldn’t normally need a slide slip as well. Very useful skill if you need it though as a backup option to descend faster. The only time I’ve needed this was landing on an uphill airstrip up a hill where I misjudged my height.
Thanks Pure Glider for the videos you make. I'm not flying a glider but a paraglider. Paragliders are very similar to fly, but don't have problems with landings in the wild because we have less speed. We are actually a kind of STOL gliders. Nevertheless we follow the same rules for the landing procedures like all the other planes do (or should do). Exept we don't have a big margin to reduce our speed. So we adjust our hight above the ground by making the base leg shorter or longer. While flying the downwind leg we try to estimate the windspeed by checking our speed relative to the ground. When you always follow strictly the same procedure you get the hang to it and things get easier. I' ve got my licence in 1988.
Yes and glider pilots should adjust their circuit size to match their height. That and using the air brakes should ensure a good stable finals every time.
Two things come to mind that my original instructor said when I was learning to fly in gliders 35 years ago: 1. "The base leg is the most important leg" -- this is true, it's where you can see the headwind you're dealing with because of the crosswind, and it's also where you can see where you have to hit the final approach. 2. "Airspeed control is crucial; if you are 5 knots over the 50 knot target approach speed, you have 1.1 squared or 21% more energy, and you land way down the runway" -- this guy picked up 10 knots over his 50 knot target speed so he had 44% too much energy. My textbook I used at the time said two things too -- you have to recover a side slip one wingspan above the ground. It also listed "ignore the altimeter" as the last step on the landing checklist. My students ask me what altitude I turn base or final, and I honestly don't really know (I've got 700 hours in gliders, >1400 flights, 285 hours instructing). As an instructor I don't know why this guy is even flying solo, let alone licensed and flying cross country alone. This looks like an attempt a student would make on their first try at judging an approach, especially if I didn't do a decent job on the ground instruction ahead of time. It could well be that he's never landed anywhere except at his home field, so wasn't ready for a different look of the runway. Our Club Libelle was recently wrecked by a low time pilot who got lost and attempted a field landing unsuccessfully. I will comment about getting off field landing instruction. It's very difficult to get that in the US. I tried very hard to get some before I would do any cross country flying, but there just aren't motorgliders available for that kind of instruction. As a student pilot I was made to land in a small field right next to the gliderport before I got signed off for the flight test. It's not typical to have something like that available, although at a lot of airports an alternative landing area can be used. We've been discussing using some nearby strips for similar purposes lately in our club. In any case, I managed to damage a glider after picking a field with a high crop, mainly because noone ever really taught me field selection properly. In any case, my first real off field landing depended on a certain amount of luck that it went well. I wasn't really very far from the field but hit a lot of sink, and found myself parked in zero sink over a plowed field at 1000 feet AGL. After a few times around, not gaining anything, and 5 miles from home, it occurred to me that the next field looked a lot better. It turned out to be a turf farm, with a better surface than the spot we usually landed at home! The plowed field I'd originally picked ("In the dirt, you won't get hurt") was actually a picked tobacco field, and certainly would have resulted in a damaged glider. Since then I like to discuss field selection with students anytime there's spare time.
Hi thanks for your comments. Yes this was apparently the students first outlanding. It is possible he was overloaded and in the scared zone, thus performed worse than normal. I'd suggest even if a student can't get off field landing training at their club, at least have their precision landings (spot landings) nailed before attempting cross country. Cheers!
@@PureGlide Oh, yes, exactly. The US does have a Bronze Badge, which we require in our club for anyone wanting to take club ships cross country. It requires 3 dual spot landings with the altimeter covered up, as well as various other skills, plus a written test. My old club also required the altitude and duration achievements of the Silver badge, plus recent currency requirements and an instructor sign-off. But, if someone has acquired their own glider a lot of that can go out the window. Spot landing contests can be a good way to increase awareness in a club too. My old club had an annual event that was always a big deal. My current club has them once in a while too.
@@mattmckrell5544 Good points made, although the closest I have gotten to real gliding is building sceneries for Condor and some 700 hours on the simulator I do know our local club is super strict about teaching out landing with regular spot landing drills and "touch and go's" (although they don't actually put the wheels down on the ground) in a motor glider at a nearby farm when the field is cleared of crop. I believe they are presently looking at getting a good two seater for further cross country training. In South Africa this is vital, out over the bush there are no paddocks, so staying out of a situation where you have land out becomes crucial too.
We are told to aim for not doing the final turn lower than 100m/300ft, where you may have a chance of correcting a beginning stall in the turn (however I do not think you can do a full spin recovery from that height and still reach the airfield). I therefore think it is a good idea to have a look at the altimeter near the final turn every once in while when doing landing patterns at the local airfield (where you can trust the altimeter) in order to keep you judgement well calibrated and prevent a bad habit of doing the final turn lower and lower on each flight until you one day hit a tree.
Ouch.. In the end once again the main set-up factor is not flying a proper approach. One of the best pieces of advice an instructor gave me was "even in deep, never leave out the crosswind leg" that is really really good advice when outlanding, I´ve found, because it gives so much control over energy state and looking at the field from a another perspective to spot fences and hidden stuff.
Yeah an outlanding should be just the same as a normal landing! And yes the circuit is critical to properly identify hazards, and the slope of the field. You can't see the slope from above or on finals, only from the side.
Great review of a difficult situation and a good learning experience for all of us. How well do glass ships slide slip? The old Slingsby Swallow dropped like a rock in a slide slip but I think it is far less useful in the modern glass gliders. The tail chute saved me on several occasions out landing in the Cirrus.
Great video, good to see in the video and comments it isn’t just pilot bashing, we all make mistakes, not always on video and it much better to learn from someone else’s
Fun fact, you can't actually multitask, that is to say you can't think about more than one task at a time. You can switch really quickly between tasks, but the brain is just not capable of think about two things at the same time. This is not to be mistaken with doing tasks automatically like driving and thinking about something else.
I was too high (1000' , recommended 600') approaching final turn, so flew .5 - 1 km over the town (Benalla). When I turned onto final the airfield was a long way away. Set the speed to best glide slope and hoped for the best. I was so low near the end of the airfield I considered going UNDER the power lines. Luckily cleared them by 10-20' and no-one commented when I landed. That was about mid 1965, in a Kookaburra, I think.
Thinking back about the first off field landing. Remember getting drawn in to close trying to determine what was planted in the field along with wires, fences, ditches and a road out. Story one of my first tow pilots didn't return one evening from a glider flight. The next morning they found his plane in a field setup for what appeared to be a tow out. When they approached the plane they found him dead inside. The wires had come right though the canopy and set the plane down almost undamaged. Off field landings need all of your attention.
Probably an "Outlanding" with instructor on an airfield in the neighbourhood is a good training. Better still 'without announcement' ;-). The instructor can avoid bad things happen and with an aerotow you're back home quickly afterwards. In my mind, an unknown airfield is (nearly) not different from an unknown outlanding field. Except for the better infrastructure afterwards... ;-)
One other thing to consider: Because the right turn to base was early the pilot was flying at an angle to the runway throughout final. When the pilot established a slip the nose lined up with the runway, but because the direction of flight was unchanged (slips don't change the direction of flight), the pilot drifted to the left while in the slip, and was at risk of hitting the brush. The correction to stop the left drift required a turn to the right, which is unsafe to do that close to the ground. A better course of action would have been for the pilot to make a correcting move toward the left early in the final, so as to fly final aimed straight at the runway direction. (CFI-G 29 years experience)
Tailwind played its part here. It might be light on the ground, but what was it doing at altitude during his circuit and approach? As evident with the need for full speedbrake and a low altitude sideslip, it wasn't doing him any favour. Accepting (or being oblivious of) tailwinds can introduce a complex set of human factors and handling issues. They can bite pilots real hard.
Yeah I didn't make it an important enough point in the video, it does make other things worse e.g. being too close into the field and too high on finals. But saying that most pilots would cope with a 5 knot tail wind happily if everything else goes right.
@@PureGlide when an accident happens its not one thing that causes it. The buzz words are 'systemic analysis' however it is recognized that what often leads up to an accident is what's called an 'error chain'. These can be as simple as handling errors, slips of judgment or even misinterpreting the wind direction. Breaking one link in an error chain will avert an accident. In this case perhaps landing into wind (as I didn't see any terrain restrictions) may just have been the right link to break. He had a Windsock too!
Great video, and excellent analysis. I am a Mechanical designer and your suggestion for the solution could Work for most of the human machine interactions!
5:57 see the airspeed rising as he descends to a short runway on final he can't bleed it off in ground effect in that short distance he can't run off the end.
Interesting that descending on final with a tailwind component the airspeed will increase , rather than with a headwind there will be a decrease, all because of wind gradient alone !
Really good analysis thank you. He did so much wrong he was extremely fortunate to get out without serious injury or worse. What he did RIGHT was..... to share this so that in however small a way, someone, somewhere, might avoid doing the same things wrong!
And when the flare/touchdown speed begins to approximate the tailwind component the controls become pretty ineffective as well. Little to no airflow over the control surfaces.
@@davidwhite8633 Yes exactly right, although when this poor chap crashed he wasn't even on the ground yet... but it would have slowed aileron control to some extent
@@davidwhite8633 Wind only affects your speed (and trajectory) relative to the ground. The glider, still in the air, is moving with its own speed in the air mass and wind has nothing to do with control surfaces effectiveness ! unless the glider is already stalled or near stall... which is not the case apparently when we see his crazy approach speed, he should have full control !! and no windshear here, windsock is almost flat, maximum 5 kts from his right...
His attempts at last-seconds slips appear unneeded. Looks like with full spoilers, and breaking applied he would have had enough runway remaining for a safe landing. Maybe would have impacted a couple bushes at the end at a low speed. Am I right?
I’ve found it’s always helpful to fix alignment and altitude issues as far out as possible so all you have to focus on short final is the flare and touchdown. He seemed to save alignment and altitude correction to coincide with the flare. That can overload any skill level.
Great analysis! As for practicing spot landings at the home field? My friends and I would have precision landing contests: wheels touch at point A, stop by point B, minimum energy, no mashing the brakes. Roll past the mark and drinks are on you!
This person has not established co-ordinated control of the glider, he is crossing controls. Timings, 1.53, left rudder, right stick. 2.36 far too much left rudder whilst apparently flying straight. Turn 3.06 nose has come up-left stick (he's turning right) + right rudder. It's a poorly coordinated turn, the nose at one point stops tracking across the horizon. 3.33, huge right rudder, left stick s adverse yaw. 3.39 over ruddering to the right. It's horrible to watch because he does not have basic control of the glider and is so uncoordinated he can't line it up with the runway. This is not a 2 seater, so he has been allowed to fly solo in a single seater. To me this looks like a supervision issue. Glad he wasn't hurt. I'm a full rated instructor, current DCFI, former Chief Flying Instructor
In our Club (in Switzerlannd) inexperienced pilots must mandatorily practice outlandings with a touring motorglider and with a FI. The procedures are trained on a real outlanding field with a go around immediately before touchdown. Futhermore they must check out the outlanding fields with a FI in a TMG along the planned x-country flight.
I was learning to fly gliders in Derbyshire before I retired in 1995 when I had money but little time but, once I did retire, it was the other way round :) However I did have a flight in New Zealand at Omarara on S Island when I was on a cycle tour there in 1999 and it was a great experience. Sadly, that was the last time I piloted a full-size aircraft but I satisfy my aviation enthusiasm with radio control models. Much safer to walk towards my (thankfully few) crashes than struggle to climb out of one! Here, it was quite obvious things were going wrong quite early on, as is explained so well. It shows that good landings follow good approaches (with models as well as full-size). What did surprise me was that the attempt was made downwind, especially as there was a windsock to see. That's not usually the case when landing out. My instructor once landed out on a schoo lplaying field between the goal posts by side slipping - but he used to fly powered aircraft that serviced the Scottish islands - often using beaches, so he was used to tricky landings. Excellent video and kudos to the 'guilty' pilot for publishing the original video
That should have been a fairly easy landout... A cascade of small errors turned it into a pile up, and that's all it takes. It looks like he had plenty of altitude when he made the airfield but his decision to make his IP right over the field started things going in the wrong direction. The limp air sock indicated there wasn't any significant cross or tail winds, so it was all on the pilot. Classic over control.
Thank-you for walking us through this. My home airfield has a 3000 ft runway we use (the first 25% of) for gliders and a 6400ft runway that the power guys use. For my checkride the wind was 12kts across the "glider" runway and so I made the decision to use the big runway (for the first time) rather than take off in a cross wind outside of the capability published in the glider manual. That screwed up all my aiming points and I ended up landing just beyond the threshold of the big runway and I stopped before I made it past the first bar of white paint. Needless to say I was not popular with the ground guys when they had to drive 1/2 a mile to fetch me. The learning there was to really think carefully about scale when looking at the place you want to land. When I did the same stupid thing on the next flight, the examiner asked me to lock the brakes and float in the ground effect. It was amazing how far we went just a few ft above the ground. The learning from that was not to worry about landing short. Close the brakes and float forever.....
Funny here in NZ a short landing is a good landing, and a long landing is almost frowned upon. The reason is we have to train to land in short paddocks or fields. The aiming point is just that: a point. If you focus on that it doesn't matter if it's at the start of a giant runway, or a tiny field. The flare and landing after the aiming point should be as short as possible. If you can do that reliably then you're ready to go land off field. As long as the field is big enough, then it doesn't matter what size it is. Holding off and flying in ground effect down the runway is fun, and also a good exercise in 'control near the ground' and energy management. So well worth practicing too. Just be careful not to always land long, otherwise you won't be able to land short when you need to. Cheers for the comments!
@@PureGlide In general here in the UK we generally land short, but at some of the wave sites you are required to get to the end of the runway because if the wave stops there will be a rush of gliders having to land in a short time period and you don't want aircraft blocking the runway. It is quite counter intuitive not to say worrying when you are used to stopping with plenty of runway ahead at your home airfield to carry enough speed to be able to taxi to the very end of the runway! I think there is an interesting national difference here. In the UK instructors are encouraged to use the term "reference point" rather than aiming point. This is to emphasise that the "reference point" is not where you are aiming to touch down or stop, but the point you are using to judge if you are over or undershooting on approach, and to plan the circuit.
“The human brain isn’t very good at multitasking” You haven’t seen me rolling a joint, while overtaking on the motorway, while I’m posting on Facebook, while eating cookies all at once.
Thanks for this review. We are working on XC training for our new pilots and discussing “Safe Land-out Skills & Assessment” w our CFI. And just did a “sneaker check” (boots on ground) of potential land-outs for XC flights. Hope the pilot was not injured!! Also..You need to be able to stop in 500 ft! Another critical skill for XC flying!
I know of two sideslips to landing that did severe damage to the glider. This is number three. Drag increases with the square of the airspeed. Increasing from 55 to 70 increases drag by 62%. This is taught as the Emergency Overshoot Avoidance Exercise in Europe and has been brought to Canada. The technique is recommended by OSTIV. Thanks to the pilot for sharing this. It's a valuable lesson. Certainly for your first few outlandings, you should be flying a standard circuit like you've been doing at your home field.
Yeah and it’s fine to do it, and a useful technique, but should be higher to get onto the correct glide scope. Not 100 feet off the ground I suggest :) I’ve used it before when I misjudged my height into a field.
@@PureGlide Agree 100' up is kinda late to realize you're too high and a difficult spot to make major corrections. A standard circuit would have given him a familiar sight picture and the opportunity to judge glideslope to aim point earlier.
Do you have a link to some more info on this 'Emergency Overshoot Avoidance Exercise'? It's the first i've heard of it, (flying for gliders for 12 years, about 500 hours now)
@@PureGlide I'm familiar with and trained in side-slipping. The comment by @George Haeh seems to suggest a technique by which you increase your airspeed with spoilers open on final approach to bleed off height. I've heard people talking about this technique before, but is not taught in Netherlands (or UK if I remember correctly) and can easily make situation worse by ending up in ground effect with a high airspeed. It might work with gliders with very effective spoilers or extreme landing flaps like early ASW20's?
My instructor always reminded me, never land with a tailwind. If the wind is straight behind you, you will have to land at a faster ground speed to avoid stalling, and you will float and land long. If the tailwind has a crosswind component, it can push the tail sideways. That's what looks like one of the things that happened here to me. if he landed more into the wind, he wouldn't have had so many factors working against him. Avoid landing with a tailwind and your glider will thank you.
Yes not ideal landing with a tailwind, but the problems started well before that. If everything else was normal a 5 knot tailwind isn't usually a problem, you simply have a faster ground roll and less aileron control at the end of the roll. Also it is easier to be too high on finals, which may have contributed in this case.
I know nothing. I appreciate the video and am grateful to the pilot for making this public so people can learn from it. As I said, I know nothing, but I was wondering if the cloud formations visible in the video during finals and short finals and the actual landing were perhaps indicators of decent lift higher up?
@@PureGlide sure...I imagine a save from too low is super difficult...too low is too low. I am loving learning about this sporrt..i did an introductory flight in Worcester South Africa a few years ago and would like to take it up in my new country Portugal. Thanks for your videos..merry Chrimbo etc....
A nice review of this accident, glad pilot is ok. Pilots need to take soaring much more seriously in general. It requires ongoing serious training & practice, a constant brutally honest assessment and re-assessment of ones true abilities, taking others advice on ones abilities (instructor and peers), and carefully planning for maintenance of land-out skills. The USA is generally trying to avoid land outs at all costs in competition with all area tasks, and under-calling tasks in general, and not opening any tasks if any sign of risk in weather. Attendance is not increasing, it’s falling. This practice results in a less prepared herd, not increased safety as sailplanes with always need to land out. All contest and cross country pilots should be fully trained and signed off with an instructor, and reassessed every two years, by an experienced cross country and contest instructor for land outs. Sadly, that won’t happen.
The lack of use of motorglider training for field landing instruction in the USA and other places maybe also be a factor ............ an hour or two in one allows for so many skills and knowledge to be developed..... certainly in the UK almost every club as a motorglider for cross country and field selection trainning - maybe Derek Pigotts legacy - he was always ahead of the game. Landing in a selected part of the airfield , using one selected field or even training in a powered aircraft(although the best option of the 3) is just not the same. The other thing people never get told his how to 'crash' a glider to minimise injury if the invetiable is to happen - I thinkTom Knauff from the USA did some work on this, maybe in one of his books.
Another aspect to the approach could be the apparent width of the runway. I don’t know where this pilot flys, but if his home field is similar to most gliding fields, it’s probably significantly wider than the runway that he attempted to land on. This ‘narrower ‘ runway could adversely skewed his judgement of how high he should be. Great synopsis of the accident, thanks!
Interesting and very informative. Just to add the AC4 has a span of only 12.6m with very large ailerons by comparison. It is also very light and 'responsive' and over control by the pilot can react in the large movements seen in the video. I too would want to double check any weighing of the aircraft if that particular one has been repaired! Well done to the pilot for sharing.
Having watched many gliding videos from the US, I was surprised that often the entry fom crosswind to final seems to be 130 to 170 deg rather than 90 deg. Meaning that there seems to be no regular standard to fly the pattern with 4 times 90 deg. Very often the pilot is flying, like here, way to close to the airfield having to do remarkable efforts to center the landing strip. Other than here, often way too low. Maybe gliding instructors in the US should be more picky in keeping a regular pattern. For flying students as well as for experienced pilots. I was tought to consider any outlanding to be a landing on a regular airflield, flying a regular pattern. That could have helped the pilot here. Inspecting the site from the air, making sure, there are no obstacles, flying a downwind, therewhile confirming the planned point of touchdown, checking the wind and altitude again and finally plan the point of entering the final. No short final, unless there is no other way. Generally speaking, the Marana Ultralight Strip could have been a perfect outlanding site. No trees, no crops, a marked landing strip, what could you ask more?
Yes here in NZ we teach a rather square circuit, we don't even cut the corner to keep the airfield in sight. And yes an outlanding should be completely normal!
He's flying a very high-performance sailplane, yet seems to be quite "ham-handed" - radically over controlling. And you are right about the cell phone on the knee - there also appears to be a notebook of some kind outboard of that left knee. I was surprised by the lack of full spoilers at touchdown and roll-out. That sailplane will fly on a whisper of a wind! Never-the-less, "Any landing you can walk away from..." Always better if the craft can fly again, though!
I'm missing the instruction program: landings must be practised along the centre line. Corrections should be done all the way down, varying with wind force and direction. The video shows big variations, which must get smaller when closer to the ground. Tom van Doormaal
I'm curious as to why he wouldn't have chosen one of the many open fields that were clearly in view instead of such a tight place to land with all the shrubs & such a short distance. I watched his video on it & he described the runway length as 1,800 feet long but there were so many more obsticales compared to the field adjacent. While the video only shows as being shared by him 3 months ago the only other video's he shared are at least 6 years ago so this leas me to believe either he wasn't a novice or this was a much older video as lautoka63 has said.
Yeah sounds like it is an old video, and makes sense if this was his first outlanding. It’s not the end of the world being over the top of where you want to land as long as you join a circuit from overhead like normal. In NZ you need to be off to the side downwind so you can see and confirm the slope of the landing area.
If you look at the outside views at the end of the landing, you can see that the landing site was definitely wide enough and obstacle free (it is an ultralight airfield) and the surrounding fields all have quite a lot of big bushes growing on them, those can be a serious obstacle at this speed and they would probably destroy the plane upon landing. In my opinion he did the right decision regarding the landing site. Nevertheless there is a lack of flying technique mastery.
To Continue: ( from your glide ratio video comments ), this glider seems to be chop gun layup. ( maybe some severed light roving laminates, but the flexibility, or rigidity, of the wing structures is a variable.
Hmm interesting! I think I have made this same mistake before! Being too focused on the aiming point and then aiming to hit it no matter what. Everything else goes out the window. I didnt see any check list, speed control looked all over the place assuming the centre instrument was speed but if it was sink then it still increased around the circuit and the angle on down wind was way too steep. All that stuff on the knee just gets in the way.
Good video Tim with lots of lessons. When I first watched the flare it looked to be tipstall related roll rates especially given the nose attitude and control inputs unless a thermal was triggered in the vicinity of the right wing that caused the uncommanded left roll to begin with. Keep up the good work.
Hi Tim, Since I haven't flown a glider yet, learning what to do to clean up that committed landing final is extremely hard for me to speculate. Obviously he was a fledgling pilot at the time of this incident. That was a painful lesson for him. Moving forward, I bet he learned to touchdown strait and not land sideways. That was a knock the wind out of you OUCH!
@@PureGlide , I plan on this year finding someone that's setup to perform an introductory glider flight with me. Been a power aviator since 1966. I love sailing boats and feel that gliding will add a new learning dimension. I've learned techniques watching you and Bruno that's already paying off with powered flight enjoyment on X-Country flights. Thanks for your channel Tim, It's one of my favorites.
Not a glider pilot, but when I was doing practice forced landings I made a lot of the same mistakes early on when I was working towards my RPL here in Australia. Keeping too tight of circuit around my picked paddock, being high on final etc. I guess when we are doing forced landing practice we effectively have a very inefficient glider.
Yeah there's not a lot of differences really! Same nerves, same skills required and decision making, just a few of the technical details are different :)
This video demonstrates the saying that the accident doesn’t happen at the point of impact ... it happens well before that.
Accident don't happen, they are the result of a chain of events, any one of which if it hadn't happened would have stopped the chain of events from turning into an "accident".
Yeah exactly right
@@PureGlide That's why many Air Forces use the term "mishap" instead of "accident" for a crash, just to reinforce the concept that nothing just happens by accident, but rather as the result of a chain of factors.
You may have seen safety posters that say: "No safety, know accident. Know safety, no accident."
Cheers from Canada! 😀
@@125brat They should be called "aircraft collisions": th-cam.com/video/puK5CwThaq4/w-d-xo.html
@@daviddunsmore103 The phrase we tend to use in the UK is: " Flight safety is no accident". Best wishes from the UK 😁
Great video, loved how you focus on solutions instead of blame.
It's very easy to comment "he was to fast" or "guy was to stressed", but your way of analyzing the multitude of issues present and their possible remedies seems a lot more constructive.
It's an approach i think we all could learn from.
Thank you, yes in my opinion, the actual flying isn't quite the point. It's more an issue of training and flying beyond your capabilities.
AND export to apply outside Gliding 🙄
Thanks to the pilot for bravely sharing this!
Good analysis of what happened and on the mental overload aspect of human performance. I find the situation of under performing due to mental overload rather familiar... currency, practice and proper training is probably the best way to do something about it.
Yeah cheers!
How do u bravely share a video
@@dillonbledsoe7680 It is very simple. You share a video like this to the benefit of others knowing that You will also receive a pile of shit from some less considerate individuals.
I guess the guy was scared shitless at having to land out. That is where everything started going wrong. It is understandable at first but you do not go on cross country unless you are comfortable and good at landing in all sorts of situations. He panicked and completely forgot his training and just focused on being on the ground at all cost. That death grip on the control says it all. Glad he did not get hurt.
Yeah exactly right.
Well I was scared shitless on my first time.....but I had more luck than this guy. ...
Thank you to the man who shared this footage
Agreed!
Not using the rudder and creating a lot of adverse yaw during the round out. And I hope the cake he was mixing turned out well!
lol, yeah I just re-watched it and in the video I mentioned he had his right foot in, but that doesn't make sense as he was yawing the other way. So yes not using the rudder I think makes more sense...
My first thoughts too. I can remember when I was first learning to fly gliders I had difficulty keeping myself lined up behind the tow plane. As soon as my instructor told me to use rudder for left/right alignment, elevator for up/ down and to avoid excessive aileron control everything clicked. This advice served me well on all my following takeoffs and landings.
There was just way too much left/right stick going on there.
The common mistake is to want to "steer" with the stick and coordinate with the rudder. It's the other way around.
Steer with the rudder and adjust the bank for the intended turn.
Of course, real coordination is achieved when both control inputs are fed in simultaneously.
Calm down bruh!!!!!! You couldn’t fly a paper plane if your life depended on it.
InstaBlaster.
As my instructor drummed into me, “a good circuit will make a good landing”, I kinda use it for many scenarios in life.
Once they make it easy to get back to NZ I’ll come for a fly.
Wise words! And yes absolutely come back to NZ sometime
I am very glad when pilots share situations like this. We can all learn from this. Thanks to the instructor for verbalising and go through the phases. Fly safe out there.
Well said!
Pretty sure you shear sheep not situations
@@nbn292 thanks teacher
@@Fatamorgana7ifly anytime
Tim - EXCELLENT analysis and professional debrief of this unfortunate accident. Thanks for the channel!
Thanks Steve!
completely agree!
first thing to recommand to novice glider pilots, turn the vario beeper off once you have decided to land, it's a distraction, creates stress and add to mental overload, and it has no whatsoever benefit if you are landing.
And as i have seen many times, no proper base is the most efficient way for a terrible landing. Thanks for sharing, requires lot of courage to post such an experience, all the best to the pilot as he probably has saved many people from making the same mistakes.
I am an instructor: From my point of view, the pilot was completely overstressed with a situation he was not prepared for. Simply look to his handling of the stick...
Yeah exactly right
@GracieM That's a bit extreme. If this pilot was recently solo and new in his gliding career, then it's understandable how his performance declines when faced with a stressful situation. He definitely needs more training and experience, but it's not reason to say he should never fly again.
@GracieM maybe go and read what the pilot says under his original video. It's his first landing away from his home strip, he misjudged it and panicked a little too late. He swallowed his ego, admitted his error, and even posted it as an example of what not to do. No one was hurt and he's been pretty humble about it.
@GracieM you seem like a terrible person
@GracieM Actually, it could have been worse, Yes he was anxious and overcontrolled the glider, but he could have tried to stretch the glide to those tempting streets up ahead. He didn't, so that was good decision making. He just needs more tuition. My anxiety got in the way when I was a student, but when I gained confidence I became very competent pilot and was asked to become an instructor. I had very good instructors myself.
Tim, good to see you providing an experienced perspective here. I'm someone who has also cramped his circuit for an outlanding, leading to a half second of pure terror when I realised that I was not going to be able to get into the field in front of me before I decided to land further ahead; across the road & the first field, over the cattle race and into a small triangular field. I crossed the fence at about 2 metres with half spoiler, then pulled full spoiler and full back stick, giving a firm but not too hard arrival. I was stopped within 100 paces from the fence, though there was only a mark from the tail skid for 30 paces. Gliders want to stay in the air!
I know, from translating the French "blue book", that they recommend a final of 30 seconds: at least 15 seconds is desirable in my experience. Count one-elephant, two-elephant to see how long your usual final is. As you turn final, pull full spoiler and see if the field rises in your view. If it does, you won't overshoot - but then close the spoilers to whatever level you think appropriate to put you mid-point in the ideal approach cone.
The fact the cockpit is structurally intact is no guarantee of no injury to the pilot, as the load is likely to have simply been transferred to the pilot's spine. There is a very useful BGA video (play it at 1.5x speed, as the English presenter talks slowly though accurately), which recommends the use of Confor energy-absorbing foam. I know, Tim, that your club for example has bought some of this foam and uses it for cushions. The presentation is at th-cam.com/video/3z-LfU38lMY/w-d-xo.html
The glider should not have been flying, as it was simply not airworthy - something the pilot knew about and had chosen to continue flights with the glider in that condition. "One more thing: stick had at that time an annoying slack of ~2cm, which partially got me into the habit of frantic left-right inputs when I got nervous"
I admire the pilot for his openness. He himself says in one of his replies "That clip was almost 7 yrs ago. Long enough distance for my wounded ego to withstand public self-humiliation"
Oh I didn't realise it was so long ago! Thanks for your comments
Thank you, Tim - very precious analyse and remarks about this incident we just saw in this video. I hope only that this pilot from this video is feeling well now and was not seriously injured during this hard landing. I wish you and other glider pilots all the best in this soaring season - and to stay high and save in every single flight!
This was a long time ago apparently, so the pilot should be good by now!
You are right. I have over 700 hrs and the thing pounded into my brain during training and check flights was Rule #1- "Fly the bloody ship" an extension of what you were saying in commentary.
Yeah absolutely
I’m applying to get my license and find your video extremely useful. I discussed this with my instructor who 100% agrees with your analysis about the combination of several factors, “poor training “ / bad estimation/panicking/overrruling the aircraft. Tks for your useful videos and suggestions. Mauro
Hi Mauro, thanks for watching and good luck with your training!
What helped me prepare for outlandings is lessons in field selection and approaches to random fields in a motorized glider, so you can try something, pull up, do it again, do it again at a different field, continuously. Really helps internalize the lessons.
As a sailing instructor and a Scuba instructor the exact same applies. Agree 100%. I am also a pilot with a few hours of gliding. You are right on. Thanks for the great and instructive video.
Thanks very much!
Well, I think that one of the main reasons this happened is that he doesn't let the glider fly. He is using very aggressive steering input all the way to the landing and he seems to fight the glider all the time.
True, but what is causing that? Nervousness? Fear? Which is caused by what? Lack of confidence? caused by? lack of training I’d suggest. From the sounds of it this was a number of years ago, so he’s no doubt had more training since.
He was to fast
@@Takiranaaa Landing downwind (even a light tailwind can make a significant difference) and the pilot in the original video stated he also had sloppy control connections - several cm's of play - the build quality on Russia's was quite poor- maybe the reason for his aggresive inputs and uncordinated flying -since attended to when the glider was rebuilt. Why you would fly a glider in that condition I have no idea though .........
Too fast and pilot induced oscillation...
Yes exactly often the aircraft would fly more stable in the absence of a pilot who often just makes things worse by making control input for no apparent reason other than to offer the pilot comfort in the delusion he has control.
I used to fly free flight gliders. Once trimmed they fly perfect all on their own!
I glide in the UK and we have to have a minimum of a hour every year in a motor-glider practicing field landings and every scenario that could arise, To check for size of the field, shape of the field, slope, crops, cattle and obstructions ie phone poles or power lines. You have to satisfy the CFI before he/she allows you to try cross country.
It's an essential thing to do IMO
Very nice commentary. A good, squared off pattern with proper distances from the runway is a skill worth developing.
The final leg in the video reminds me of a moment in my glider training. In one instance I was struggling to get out of a poor position on tow which I thought was due to insufficient control authority. I mentioned this to the instructor in the back seat. He explained that he had seen the poor position developing for some time. One needs to develop good planning and habits and not count on being able to manhandle the controls to cover for poor setup.
I’m sure that landing wasn’t the pilot’s proudest moment. I’m thankful he posted the video for others to learn from. Hopefully he didn’t get banged up too badly.
We've all been there, at this level of flying! Hopefully there's an instructor in the back to catch it though, and you're own your own when you've past this point!
The controls are tricky, and easy to over-react to when learning to fly. Especially when you are stressed like this pilot, it's easy to get the timing a bit wrong. But yes agreed more experienced pilots don't get into bad situations in the first place, with good planning and habits.
Cheers for watching!
Side slipping was a pre-War very English method of approach. In that seemingly deserted area I do not know why he did not line up squarely with the strip much earlier on and, given the shortness of the strip, drop down as soon over the threshold as possible.
That was very educational. A good thing that the pilot shared this. This teaches us more about human factors than the actual flying mistakes that were made. When stress takes over rationality, you fall back on your instincts if you lack sufficient experience. Procedures are thrown overboard which were designed to keep you out of trouble. Pilots need to be aware this can happen and recognise it, because it can happen to even very experienced pilots. Easier said than done, I know.
Hey man, your videos are the very definition of constructive criticism; kudos for that and for asking the pilot's permission to go about it.
Monday morning quarterbacking is always easy. This looked to me to be a rushed landing. He looked to be forcing the aircraft down, and started a short approach from too high an altitude. Compounding the speed created from being too high and diving to reduce altitude he created even more energy by landing downwind. Maybe he was overloaded mentally due to lack of confidence or fear. The cascade can be fully observed here. I salute this pilot for posting this so the rest of us can learn from his mistakes, and I am glad he wasn't physically injured, although I am sure his psyche took a beating and this likely left a mark for a long time on his confidence.
Yeah agreed
Looked like he didn't have the necessary skills to use the rudder correctly either.
@Pure Glide It’s worth mentioning the pilots comments in the original video. He said that the ‘controls had 2cm of slack’ which caused him to develop a habit of moving the stick frenetically. In my mind the aircraft is unserviceable in this condition. Add a poorly planned circuit from 750ft Agl, lack of base leg and unexpected tailwind and you get what you see. I applaud the pilot for sharing the video so others learn. It shows how quickly everything can go wrong.
Hmm I'm not quite convinced, even with slop in the stick, and a tail wind, and a small circuit, a well trained or experienced pilot wouldn't land like that. What is common is for a lot of people to find excuses when things go wrong, to avoid blaming themselves and their lack of skill or training. We all do it to some extent. But for aviation it's important to counter it as much as possible. But yes I do agree, we must thank the pilot for sharing so we can all learn from it.
A fair analysis. I remember that in older generation gliders, slowing down was more effective for losing height with poor airbrakes. What type of glider was it and did it have spoilers or airbrakes? I'm just glad that there weren't go-pros and SM when I started. Looking at the sky, it might have been easier to find a thermal and climb away :-) Very good of the pilot to share his mistakes with the rest of us.
Yes I don't know if the pilot built up speed for that reason, I suspect it was more a situation where the speed control was not very good.
I love your commentary and analysis on these accidents. I was surprised that you said that you didn't think that the downwind landing had much influence on the account. Having done a downwind landing myself in a powered aircraft in very light breeze I was surprised at how much it changed the dynamics of the whole maneuver. The aircraft drifted further, tending to float rather than touching down and it burnt up a lot more runway than normal which seemed to be in evidence in this video. It makes me think that it could well be a primary contributing factor to the accident, especially if the pilot was relatively new and inexperienced. I also agree with your comments about inexperience being a factor to consider. A lack of experience would have resulted in an increase in the amount of stress as a result of having to perform the out-landing which might explain why he was overhead the airfield and didn't take into account the windsock direction when choosing the runway. It's almost as if he was so focused on getting the aircraft back onto the ground that he would have done so irrespective of the prevailing conditions and the consequences. My comment are pure speculation and the pilots experience is a great chance for us all to learn from.
Yes you are probably right, even 5 knots tailwind can make a big difference, and may well have been a contributing factor. It'll make the whole thing happen faster and feel much faster. Also being close in won't help with a tail wind, you'll end up too high much more easily. And yes rewatching the video there definitely is some on the windsock. Also ahead in view is a big convergence which is likely sucking. Even if you screw that up though, it shouldn't affect the landing, aiming point and touch down that much.
At my club in the UK we get pilots to do downwind landings in very light winds as part of their training. We emphasise that we are not teaching them land down wind as such, but so they can experience the longer float and relative high ground speed for the airspeed so they are ready for this if they do land downwind deliberately or by accident.
Have landed down wind in a precision landing competition, made it a bit awkward but isn’t really a problem if the wind isn’t too strong.
I've watched a few of your videos and these glider crash analysis videos are pretty interesting.
Thanks! Yes no doubt there will be more :)
Great to watch and learn from unfortunate mistakes made by someone else. Love this channel.
Glad you like it :)
One of my old instructors, often repeated the mantra, "any landing, no matter how bad it seems, that you walk away from is a good one", this bloke was damn lucky to have done that. Everyone had offered their thoughts about what went wrong, so I won't compound the theories by offering my thoughts. I'll just say many years ago, while flying out of Waikerie in South Australia, I saw one of Australia's most experienced gliding instructors do exactly that, walk away from an on-tow crash landing, and it wasn't pretty to watch. The reason this happened was later to be found that a mounting affixed to the elevator had cracked, and broke away from the rest of the fixture, the pilot had no option but to try and land as best he could without the aid of the elevator, and subsequently flat-bottomed to the ground from 200 meters. I know this has nothing to do with the video, I'm just saying any situation can and does arise, and no matter how good or bad you are, you'll often get caught out, unless you let your training take over.
Well said! Yes things can definitely happen no matter what your skill level. Cheers
Thanks for the educational video. This reminds me to take up some outlanding instruction on a motorglider, to learn about the visual illusions and field selection.
Yeah absolutely, a great way to do it in a motor gliding!
Amazing that the guy try to do cross country with that landing skil. People are brave.
We all learn, sometimes a harder way than other times
@@PureGlide Does the instructor need to approve cross-country first? Sorry for all these questions, but I am also a fresh pilot. I'd be sick if I tried cross country without really good landing skills. How do you know if someone is ready for such a trip?
@@jacekpiterow900 If you are new to gliding give yourself the time to work on your skills in flight. Ask your instructors to go a small cross country with you.
Watch the video to the end. There Tim tells what to practice beforehand.
It is also very good recommendation to vist some known oulanding fields near the airfield.
I hadn't an outlanding yet. But i did practice precission landing on different spots of the home airfield. (Military airfiel with 5 gras strips). I also did a good practice flight with an instructor on a new airfield with a glider i have never flown. I sticked a Postit over the altimeter and had to guess the landing pattern.
@@jacekpiterow900 hi good question, I suspect different countries have different rules but here in NZ we generally train people to land in fields before they go too far from the airfield. However saying that anyone who has been taught to land accurately should be able to land off field as well.
@@michaelderflinger5002 Seems reasonable, thanks. Is outlanding also expensive on your airfield? Seems to be premeditated to discourage people from it.
I think he really wanted to hit that point at the end of the runway and totally forgot that direction mattered, too.
Not aligning the path over ground with the runway made the situation even more unstructured and harder. He had to change alignment last second and screwed it up because of overwhelm. I suppose alignment was too much effort for him to take care about early and then was even more so in the end.
Confusing rudder and aleron function seems a typical panic reaction. I'm not sure if he intended to slip.
Yeah pretty much!
Kudos to the pilot for posting this as a lesson to new pilots. I must say I'm a little surprised at his having to land out as the conditions looked quite buoyant - flat bottom cumulus and cloud streets all around. A little more experience should help him avoid the downwind high speed final and tense over-control in the future 👍. Almost had to land out at California City over 30 years ago. Was setting up on final for a dirt road landing when I caught a thermal at 500 feet. I stayed in that thing till I was 10,000 AGL!! Breathed a sigh of relief and made it back easily, thank goodness 😉
Where there is good lift there is also good sink, and earlier pilots just aren't always aware of how to get out of it quickly. In this case there is a big convergence sucking infront of him as he's landing, so that may kill the local thermals around where he was too. Hard to tell from a low resolution video.
In my youth, I also made a few outlandings where it was tbh just a good portion of luck that kept the airplane and me intact.
In my opinion, the 4 lessons are:
1. accept at a safe altitude that the flight/flying-day is over and that from this moment on you only have one, but extremely important task: land safely - no more searching for thermals, no more tactical analysis, no more checking the gnns recorder or final glide computer while you take care of the landing
2. don't invent new approach and landing procedures, especially not when landing outside, keep your distance from the landing field and fly as you would at your home airfield
3. approach the runway straight and stable, you need a stable approach, especially if you are under stress. In my opinion, this point is also the core problem in the video. At no time there was a stable approach to the runway, but an angled approach with a half-hearted slip.
I have never flown myself. But it seems he was going waaay too fast.
I am going for an ultralight license soon. And i hope to make it as an instructor eventually as well.
Yes he was a bit too fast! Another thing by itself shouldn’t be a problem. Good luck with the microlight license!
I learn to fly gliders myself. Your videos are very good to understand what not to do and how to do better👍🏻good job
at my gliding club we are use cones to set out a landing field to land in, its about 30 by 30 and with in that you need to touch down that's the goal of it. also to be able to control a side slip its a good skill in my opinion. i enjoy a nice side slip time to time to land with you can have so much control while in a side slip. love toe vids and keep it up. would love to fly same day in NZ when able to
That's great practice, glad to hear. Hope to see you here one day!
There was a tragic glider accident in America a few years ago, I don't know if it's already been analysed in a vid, but it took off under tow with the small trolley under the tail still accidentally attached.
The controller on the ground radioed "Abort", so either the glider pilot or tow pilot released the cable and the glider nosed into the ground killing the pilot and a woman passenger and a toddler on her lap.
I've not been able to find an accident report to find out exactly what happened.
Jeepers that is horrible, it's happened a few times, but I hadn't heard of a woman and her child before :(
Thanks to Pilot for sharing
Yeah absolutely.
Thanks for a very good article, it raised many good issues. Thanks to the pilot who bared all so we can learn. His acceptance of fault is a fabulous sign that he can progress to a high standard of flying. He was clearly flummoxed by his situation, being faced with an unavoidable outlanding. He did seem inexperienced but at least chose a good landing place. Landing downwind not only extends the roll distance but can also reverse controls at some point on the ground roll. I hope this pilot continued to fly.
Thanks very much! Yes I believe both the glider and the pilot have flown a lot since this accident, it was quite a while ago.
Cheers!
I haven't had an outlanding yet... but damn, if I ever got there and there was an airstrip as beautiful as this under me, I'd probably be as calm as when I am landing on my home airfield.
Yeah I think the decision to choose this field was a good one! Lots of vectors so you could land into wind. In theory it should have been perfect...
@@PureGlide choose?....it would have been pretty impossible to avoid ;)
@ DasFlieger: Is the name "DasFlieger" intentional? Because this sounds german, but in Germany we say "Der Flieger"... 🤔
@@MisterIvyMike yes, in fact, it is ; ) Long story short, me and my friends had this internal joke where everything german is "das" (because we were bad at it and made jokes about it). So yes...
Great video. I am learning a lot about gliding from these videos. One of the smartest people I flew with explained something similar, but they explained it as carrying a bunch of plates or something. When one too many is added you don't just drop one, you can drop them all in a cascade. Fixation is probably more typical in the control aspects you describe, but you covered a close call where a pilot deployed spoilers very close to some trees as they tried to reach the field and that's what came to mind. Even experienced pilots should be careful that as a situation increases in complexity they don't forget to take a breath and focus on what they know, which is fly the glider.
Yeah also a good analogy! Cheers
A slip increases drag, _and_ shortens the effective length of the wings, decreasing lift force.
In my opinion, you should always use slip and spoilers in landing, and if you are likely not to have someone fly under you in final, start high and come down fast. Excess altitude is never a problem if you have practiced this on every landing. I haven't flown for several years though.
A slip seems like a great idea from higher up when you are tying to reduce speed on approach but it certainly didn't seem like a good idea when he was 10ft from the ground
Yes the spoilers or air brakes on a glider are usually very effective so you shouldn’t normally need a slide slip as well. Very useful skill if you need it though as a backup option to descend faster. The only time I’ve needed this was landing on an uphill airstrip up a hill where I misjudged my height.
Thanks Pure Glider for the videos you make. I'm not flying a glider but a paraglider. Paragliders are very similar to fly, but don't have problems with landings in the wild because we have less speed. We are actually a kind of STOL gliders. Nevertheless we follow the same rules for the landing procedures like all the other planes do (or should do). Exept we don't have a big margin to reduce our speed. So we adjust our hight above the ground by making the base leg shorter or longer. While flying the downwind leg we try to estimate the windspeed by checking our speed relative to the ground. When you always follow strictly the same procedure you get the hang to it and things get easier. I' ve got my licence in 1988.
Yes and glider pilots should adjust their circuit size to match their height. That and using the air brakes should ensure a good stable finals every time.
@@PureGlide
Right. This are the skills we get by practice and by experience, which the pilot in this example obviously didn't have.
Two things come to mind that my original instructor said when I was learning to fly in gliders 35 years ago:
1. "The base leg is the most important leg" -- this is true, it's where you can see the headwind you're dealing with because of the crosswind, and it's also where you can see where you have to hit the final approach.
2. "Airspeed control is crucial; if you are 5 knots over the 50 knot target approach speed, you have 1.1 squared or 21% more energy, and you land way down the runway" -- this guy picked up 10 knots over his 50 knot target speed so he had 44% too much energy.
My textbook I used at the time said two things too -- you have to recover a side slip one wingspan above the ground. It also listed "ignore the altimeter" as the last step on the landing checklist. My students ask me what altitude I turn base or final, and I honestly don't really know (I've got 700 hours in gliders, >1400 flights, 285 hours instructing).
As an instructor I don't know why this guy is even flying solo, let alone licensed and flying cross country alone. This looks like an attempt a student would make on their first try at judging an approach, especially if I didn't do a decent job on the ground instruction ahead of time. It could well be that he's never landed anywhere except at his home field, so wasn't ready for a different look of the runway. Our Club Libelle was recently wrecked by a low time pilot who got lost and attempted a field landing unsuccessfully.
I will comment about getting off field landing instruction. It's very difficult to get that in the US. I tried very hard to get some before I would do any cross country flying, but there just aren't motorgliders available for that kind of instruction. As a student pilot I was made to land in a small field right next to the gliderport before I got signed off for the flight test. It's not typical to have something like that available, although at a lot of airports an alternative landing area can be used. We've been discussing using some nearby strips for similar purposes lately in our club. In any case, I managed to damage a glider after picking a field with a high crop, mainly because noone ever really taught me field selection properly.
In any case, my first real off field landing depended on a certain amount of luck that it went well. I wasn't really very far from the field but hit a lot of sink, and found myself parked in zero sink over a plowed field at 1000 feet AGL. After a few times around, not gaining anything, and 5 miles from home, it occurred to me that the next field looked a lot better. It turned out to be a turf farm, with a better surface than the spot we usually landed at home! The plowed field I'd originally picked ("In the dirt, you won't get hurt") was actually a picked tobacco field, and certainly would have resulted in a damaged glider. Since then I like to discuss field selection with students anytime there's spare time.
Hi thanks for your comments. Yes this was apparently the students first outlanding. It is possible he was overloaded and in the scared zone, thus performed worse than normal.
I'd suggest even if a student can't get off field landing training at their club, at least have their precision landings (spot landings) nailed before attempting cross country.
Cheers!
@@PureGlide Oh, yes, exactly. The US does have a Bronze Badge, which we require in our club for anyone wanting to take club ships cross country. It requires 3 dual spot landings with the altimeter covered up, as well as various other skills, plus a written test. My old club also required the altitude and duration achievements of the Silver badge, plus recent currency requirements and an instructor sign-off. But, if someone has acquired their own glider a lot of that can go out the window.
Spot landing contests can be a good way to increase awareness in a club too. My old club had an annual event that was always a big deal. My current club has them once in a while too.
@@mattmckrell5544 Good points made, although the closest I have gotten to real gliding is building sceneries for Condor and some 700 hours on the simulator I do know our local club is super strict about teaching out landing with regular spot landing drills and "touch and go's" (although they don't actually put the wheels down on the ground) in a motor glider at a nearby farm when the field is cleared of crop. I believe they are presently looking at getting a good two seater for further cross country training. In South Africa this is vital, out over the bush there are no paddocks, so staying out of a situation where you have land out becomes crucial too.
We are told to aim for not doing the final turn lower than 100m/300ft, where you may have a chance of correcting a beginning stall in the turn (however I do not think you can do a full spin recovery from that height and still reach the airfield).
I therefore think it is a good idea to have a look at the altimeter near the final turn every once in while when doing landing patterns at the local airfield (where you can trust the altimeter) in order to keep you judgement well calibrated and prevent a bad habit of doing the final turn lower and lower on each flight until you one day hit a tree.
Ouch.. In the end once again the main set-up factor is not flying a proper approach. One of the best pieces of advice an instructor gave me was "even in deep, never leave out the crosswind leg" that is really really good advice when outlanding, I´ve found, because it gives so much control over energy state and looking at the field from a another perspective to spot fences and hidden stuff.
Yeah an outlanding should be just the same as a normal landing! And yes the circuit is critical to properly identify hazards, and the slope of the field. You can't see the slope from above or on finals, only from the side.
Great review of a difficult situation and a good learning experience for all of us.
How well do glass ships slide slip? The old Slingsby Swallow dropped like a rock in a slide slip but I think it is far less useful in the modern glass gliders. The tail chute saved me on several occasions out landing in the Cirrus.
Yeah most side slip fine! Obviously the descent rate isn’t as high on longer wing high performance machines. Cheers
Great video, good to see in the video and comments it isn’t just pilot bashing, we all make mistakes, not always on video and it much better to learn from someone else’s
Thanks 👍 absolutely :) I bet a lot of newer glider pilots will perform in a similar way under pressure
Fun fact, you can't actually multitask, that is to say you can't think about more than one task at a time. You can switch really quickly between tasks, but the brain is just not capable of think about two things at the same time. This is not to be mistaken with doing tasks automatically like driving and thinking about something else.
Yeah sounds about right!
yes there isn't such a thing like multitasking, its just switching fast between multiple tasks...
Thanx, now I can tell my wife she cant multitask either...
@@ilikegliding Very brave
@@brettnaysmith3949 Naaah, I'm all talk and no show....
I was too high (1000' , recommended 600') approaching final turn, so flew .5 - 1 km over the town (Benalla).
When I turned onto final the airfield was a long way away. Set the speed to best glide slope and hoped for the best. I was so low near the end of the airfield I considered going UNDER the power lines. Luckily cleared them by 10-20' and no-one commented when I landed. That was about mid 1965, in a Kookaburra, I think.
Blimey! Glad it worked out :)
Thanks mate. Stuff to learn here, and grateful your analysis!
No worries!
Thinking back about the first off field landing. Remember getting drawn in to close trying to determine what was planted in the field along with wires, fences, ditches and a road out. Story one of my first tow pilots didn't return one evening from a glider flight. The next morning they found his plane in a field setup for what appeared to be a tow out. When they approached the plane they found him dead inside. The wires had come right though the canopy and set the plane down almost undamaged. Off field landings need all of your attention.
Sorry to hear that, yes wires a real danger when outlanding in particular.
Probably an "Outlanding" with instructor on an airfield in the neighbourhood is a good training. Better still 'without announcement' ;-). The instructor can avoid bad things happen and with an aerotow you're back home quickly afterwards. In my mind, an unknown airfield is (nearly) not different from an unknown outlanding field. Except for the better infrastructure afterwards... ;-)
And to add, ideally every landing is almost identical, no matter if it's an airfield or a paddock!
One other thing to consider: Because the right turn to base was early the pilot was flying at an angle to the runway throughout final. When the pilot established a slip the nose lined up with the runway, but because the direction of flight was unchanged (slips don't change the direction of flight), the pilot drifted to the left while in the slip, and was at risk of hitting the brush. The correction to stop the left drift required a turn to the right, which is unsafe to do that close to the ground. A better course of action would have been for the pilot to make a correcting move toward the left early in the final, so as to fly final aimed straight at the runway direction. (CFI-G 29 years experience)
Yeah agreed, just getting lined up with the runway earlier would have made the rest of it a lot easier for him.
Tailwind played its part here. It might be light on the ground, but what was it doing at altitude during his circuit and approach? As evident with the need for full speedbrake and a low altitude sideslip, it wasn't doing him any favour. Accepting (or being oblivious of) tailwinds can introduce a complex set of human factors and handling issues. They can bite pilots real hard.
Yeah I didn't make it an important enough point in the video, it does make other things worse e.g. being too close into the field and too high on finals. But saying that most pilots would cope with a 5 knot tail wind happily if everything else goes right.
@@PureGlide when an accident happens its not one thing that causes it. The buzz words are 'systemic analysis' however it is recognized that what often leads up to an accident is what's called an 'error chain'. These can be as simple as handling errors, slips of judgment or even misinterpreting the wind direction. Breaking one link in an error chain will avert an accident. In this case perhaps landing into wind (as I didn't see any terrain restrictions) may just have been the right link to break. He had a Windsock too!
Great video, and excellent analysis. I am a Mechanical designer and your suggestion for the solution could Work for most of the human machine interactions!
5:57 see the airspeed rising as he descends to a short runway on final he can't bleed it off in ground effect in that short distance he can't run off the end.
Yeah the lack of airspeed control is definitely a problem, but just one of many
Interesting that descending on final with a tailwind component the airspeed will increase , rather than with a headwind there will be a decrease, all because of wind gradient alone !
@@davidwhite8633 True I had not thought of that before!
Really good analysis thank you. He did so much wrong he was extremely fortunate to get out without serious injury or worse. What he did RIGHT was..... to share this so that in however small a way, someone, somewhere, might avoid doing the same things wrong!
Well said :)
Looking at windsock. He was landing with a tailwind! 😉
Yeah he was, I should have talked about that more
@@PureGlide And why he was half way down the runway in no time as well!
And when the flare/touchdown speed begins to approximate the tailwind component the controls become pretty ineffective as well. Little to no airflow over the control surfaces.
@@davidwhite8633 Yes exactly right, although when this poor chap crashed he wasn't even on the ground yet... but it would have slowed aileron control to some extent
@@davidwhite8633 Wind only affects your speed (and trajectory) relative to the ground. The glider, still in the air, is moving with its own speed in the air mass and wind has nothing to do with control surfaces effectiveness ! unless the glider is already stalled or near stall... which is not the case apparently when we see his crazy approach speed, he should have full control !! and no windshear here, windsock is almost flat, maximum 5 kts from his right...
Cool, if in doubt use the stick to mix wallpaper paste, my word .
Good tip!
His attempts at last-seconds slips appear unneeded. Looks like with full spoilers, and breaking applied he would have had enough runway remaining for a safe landing. Maybe would have impacted a couple bushes at the end at a low speed. Am I right?
Agreed, shouldn't have tried a slip so low level. He never put the rudders back where they should be afterwards.
I’ve found it’s always helpful to fix alignment and altitude issues as far out as possible so all you have to focus on short final is the flare and touchdown. He seemed to save alignment and altitude correction to coincide with the flare. That can overload any skill level.
Yeah agreed!
I'm not a pilot of any kind but I could see he was over controlling the aircraft. The windsock was barely above limp. I glad the pilot is OK.
Cheers
Great analysis! As for practicing spot landings at the home field? My friends and I would have precision landing contests: wheels touch at point A, stop by point B, minimum energy, no mashing the brakes. Roll past the mark and drinks are on you!
Yeah that’s a great exercise to practice precision landings! We do it in winter sometimes as a way to keep current
This person has not established co-ordinated control of the glider, he is crossing controls. Timings, 1.53, left rudder, right stick. 2.36 far too much left rudder whilst apparently flying straight. Turn 3.06 nose has come up-left stick (he's turning right) + right rudder. It's a poorly coordinated turn, the nose at one point stops tracking across the horizon. 3.33, huge right rudder, left stick s adverse yaw. 3.39 over ruddering to the right. It's horrible to watch because he does not have basic control of the glider and is so uncoordinated he can't line it up with the runway. This is not a 2 seater, so he has been allowed to fly solo in a single seater. To me this looks like a supervision issue. Glad he wasn't hurt. I'm a full rated instructor, current DCFI, former Chief Flying Instructor
Yes agreed
@@PureGlide Thanks, i love your stuff.
In our Club (in Switzerlannd) inexperienced pilots must mandatorily practice outlandings with a touring motorglider and with a FI. The procedures are trained on a real outlanding field with a go around immediately before touchdown. Futhermore they must check out the outlanding fields with a FI in a TMG along the planned x-country flight.
seems like he is in pure panic and has lost proper control early on
Yeah exactly
I was learning to fly gliders in Derbyshire before I retired in 1995 when I had money but little time but, once I did retire, it was the other way round :) However I did have a flight in New Zealand at Omarara on S Island when I was on a cycle tour there in 1999 and it was a great experience.
Sadly, that was the last time I piloted a full-size aircraft but I satisfy my aviation enthusiasm with radio control models. Much safer to walk towards my (thankfully few) crashes than struggle to climb out of one!
Here, it was quite obvious things were going wrong quite early on, as is explained so well. It shows that good landings follow good approaches (with models as well as full-size). What did surprise me was that the attempt was made downwind, especially as there was a windsock to see. That's not usually the case when landing out. My instructor once landed out on a schoo lplaying field between the goal posts by side slipping - but he used to fly powered aircraft that serviced the Scottish islands - often using beaches, so he was used to tricky landings.
Excellent video and kudos to the 'guilty' pilot for publishing the original video
Hey thanks for your comments, and great to hear you've experienced Omarama!
He's over controlling
Sure is! Just one of the many problems
Excellent video with a great analysis. Thank you for sharing your point of view as an instructor!
Thank you, cheers!
That should have been a fairly easy landout... A cascade of small errors turned it into a pile up, and that's all it takes. It looks like he had plenty of altitude when he made the airfield but his decision to make his IP right over the field started things going in the wrong direction. The limp air sock indicated there wasn't any significant cross or tail winds, so it was all on the pilot. Classic over control.
Yeah pretty much!
Thank-you for walking us through this. My home airfield has a 3000 ft runway we use (the first 25% of) for gliders and a 6400ft runway that the power guys use. For my checkride the wind was 12kts across the "glider" runway and so I made the decision to use the big runway (for the first time) rather than take off in a cross wind outside of the capability published in the glider manual. That screwed up all my aiming points and I ended up landing just beyond the threshold of the big runway and I stopped before I made it past the first bar of white paint. Needless to say I was not popular with the ground guys when they had to drive 1/2 a mile to fetch me. The learning there was to really think carefully about scale when looking at the place you want to land. When I did the same stupid thing on the next flight, the examiner asked me to lock the brakes and float in the ground effect. It was amazing how far we went just a few ft above the ground. The learning from that was not to worry about landing short. Close the brakes and float forever.....
Funny here in NZ a short landing is a good landing, and a long landing is almost frowned upon. The reason is we have to train to land in short paddocks or fields.
The aiming point is just that: a point. If you focus on that it doesn't matter if it's at the start of a giant runway, or a tiny field. The flare and landing after the aiming point should be as short as possible. If you can do that reliably then you're ready to go land off field. As long as the field is big enough, then it doesn't matter what size it is.
Holding off and flying in ground effect down the runway is fun, and also a good exercise in 'control near the ground' and energy management. So well worth practicing too. Just be careful not to always land long, otherwise you won't be able to land short when you need to.
Cheers for the comments!
@@PureGlide Here too. They just didn’t want to haul the glider half a mile.
@@PureGlide In general here in the UK we generally land short, but at some of the wave sites you are required to get to the end of the runway because if the wave stops there will be a rush of gliders having to land in a short time period and you don't want aircraft blocking the runway. It is quite counter intuitive not to say worrying when you are used to stopping with plenty of runway ahead at your home airfield to carry enough speed to be able to taxi to the very end of the runway!
I think there is an interesting national difference here. In the UK instructors are encouraged to use the term "reference point" rather than aiming point. This is to emphasise that the "reference point" is not where you are aiming to touch down or stop, but the point you are using to judge if you are over or undershooting on approach, and to plan the circuit.
“The human brain isn’t very good at multitasking”
You haven’t seen me rolling a joint, while overtaking on the motorway, while I’m posting on Facebook, while eating cookies all at once.
Haha some of those must be second nature :)
Hand or machine rolled? What sort of cookies?
My guess would be hash cake.
Thanks for this review. We are working on XC training for our new pilots and discussing “Safe Land-out Skills & Assessment” w our CFI. And just did a “sneaker check” (boots on ground) of potential land-outs for XC flights. Hope the pilot was not injured!! Also..You need to be able to stop in 500 ft! Another critical skill for XC flying!
Great to hear you're working on these kinds of things! Cheers
It would be interesting to know the experience of the pilot and in particular, his recent experience on the type.
All I know for sure is it was his first outlanding.
I know of two sideslips to landing that did severe damage to the glider. This is number three.
Drag increases with the square of the airspeed. Increasing from 55 to 70 increases drag by 62%.
This is taught as the Emergency Overshoot Avoidance Exercise in Europe and has been brought to Canada. The technique is recommended by OSTIV.
Thanks to the pilot for sharing this. It's a valuable lesson.
Certainly for your first few outlandings, you should be flying a standard circuit like you've been doing at your home field.
Yeah and it’s fine to do it, and a useful technique, but should be higher to get onto the correct glide scope. Not 100 feet off the ground I suggest :) I’ve used it before when I misjudged my height into a field.
@@PureGlide Agree 100' up is kinda late to realize you're too high and a difficult spot to make major corrections. A standard circuit would have given him a familiar sight picture and the opportunity to judge glideslope to aim point earlier.
Do you have a link to some more info on this 'Emergency Overshoot Avoidance Exercise'?
It's the first i've heard of it, (flying for gliders for 12 years, about 500 hours now)
@@StudentGoose Normal name is a "sideslip". Ask the Gimli Glider crew about it :)
@@PureGlide I'm familiar with and trained in side-slipping.
The comment by @George Haeh seems to suggest a technique by which you increase your airspeed with spoilers open on final approach to bleed off height.
I've heard people talking about this technique before, but is not taught in Netherlands (or UK if I remember correctly) and can easily make situation worse by ending up in ground effect with a high airspeed.
It might work with gliders with very effective spoilers or extreme landing flaps like early ASW20's?
My instructor always reminded me, never land with a tailwind. If the wind is straight behind you, you will have to land at a faster ground speed to avoid stalling, and you will float and land long. If the tailwind has a crosswind component, it can push the tail sideways. That's what looks like one of the things that happened here to me. if he landed more into the wind, he wouldn't have had so many factors working against him. Avoid landing with a tailwind and your glider will thank you.
Yes not ideal landing with a tailwind, but the problems started well before that. If everything else was normal a 5 knot tailwind isn't usually a problem, you simply have a faster ground roll and less aileron control at the end of the roll. Also it is easier to be too high on finals, which may have contributed in this case.
I know nothing. I appreciate the video and am grateful to the pilot for making this public so people can learn from it. As I said, I know nothing, but I was wondering if the cloud formations visible in the video during finals and short finals and the actual landing were perhaps indicators of decent lift higher up?
Yeah pretty much, but that doesn't always mean it's easy to find the thermals when you're down lower. As this chap found out!
@@PureGlide sure...I imagine a save from too low is super difficult...too low is too low. I am loving learning about this sporrt..i did an introductory flight in Worcester South Africa a few years ago and would like to take it up in my new country Portugal. Thanks for your videos..merry Chrimbo etc....
A nice review of this accident, glad pilot is ok. Pilots need to take soaring much more seriously in general. It requires ongoing serious training & practice, a constant brutally honest assessment and re-assessment of ones true abilities, taking others advice on ones abilities (instructor and peers), and carefully planning for maintenance of land-out skills. The USA is generally trying to avoid land outs at all costs in competition with all area tasks, and under-calling tasks in general, and not opening any tasks if any sign of risk in weather. Attendance is not increasing, it’s falling. This practice results in a less prepared herd, not increased safety as sailplanes with always need to land out. All contest and cross country pilots should be fully trained and signed off with an instructor, and reassessed every two years, by an experienced cross country and contest instructor for land outs. Sadly, that won’t happen.
Agreed
The lack of use of motorglider training for field landing instruction in the USA and other places maybe also be a factor ............ an hour or two in one allows for so many skills and knowledge to be developed..... certainly in the UK almost every club as a motorglider for cross country and field selection trainning - maybe Derek Pigotts legacy - he was always ahead of the game. Landing in a selected part of the airfield , using one selected field or even training in a powered aircraft(although the best option of the 3) is just not the same. The other thing people never get told his how to 'crash' a glider to minimise injury if the invetiable is to happen - I thinkTom Knauff from the USA did some work on this, maybe in one of his books.
Another aspect to the approach could be the apparent width of the runway. I don’t know where this pilot flys, but if his home field is similar to most gliding fields, it’s probably significantly wider than the runway that he attempted to land on. This ‘narrower ‘ runway could adversely skewed his judgement of how high he should be.
Great synopsis of the accident, thanks!
Yeah exactly right and similar to what I was trying to say. A different size strip can give a vastly different impression of how high you are.
Add full power, go around.
Interesting and very informative. Just to add the AC4 has a span of only 12.6m with very large ailerons by comparison. It is also very light and 'responsive' and over control by the pilot can react in the large movements seen in the video. I too would want to double check any weighing of the aircraft if that particular one has been repaired! Well done to the pilot for sharing.
Thanks for the comment!
Having watched many gliding videos from the US, I was surprised that often the entry fom crosswind to final seems to be 130 to 170 deg rather than 90 deg. Meaning that there seems to be no regular standard to fly the pattern with 4 times 90 deg. Very often the pilot is flying, like here, way to close to the airfield having to do remarkable efforts to center the landing strip. Other than here, often way too low. Maybe gliding instructors in the US should be more picky in keeping a regular pattern. For flying students as well as for experienced pilots.
I was tought to consider any outlanding to be a landing on a regular airflield, flying a regular pattern. That could have helped the pilot here. Inspecting the site from the air, making sure, there are no obstacles, flying a downwind, therewhile confirming the planned point of touchdown, checking the wind and altitude again and finally plan the point of entering the final. No short final, unless there is no other way.
Generally speaking, the Marana Ultralight Strip could have been a perfect outlanding site. No trees, no crops, a marked landing strip, what could you ask more?
Yes here in NZ we teach a rather square circuit, we don't even cut the corner to keep the airfield in sight. And yes an outlanding should be completely normal!
Panic mode is right. He got to walk away.Loved flying gliders 80’s. THX for sharing.
Thanks for watching!
That cell phone on his leg was the Least of his worries.. SMH
Agreed!
He's flying a very high-performance sailplane, yet seems to be quite "ham-handed" - radically over controlling. And you are right about the cell phone on the knee - there also appears to be a notebook of some kind outboard of that left knee. I was surprised by the lack of full spoilers at touchdown and roll-out. That sailplane will fly on a whisper of a wind! Never-the-less, "Any landing you can walk away from..." Always better if the craft can fly again, though!
Agreed, cheers!
Pilot said that there was over 2cm yes CM play on ailerons. Jeeeeesus...
eek!
I'm missing the instruction program: landings must be practised along the centre line. Corrections should be done all the way down, varying with wind force and direction. The video shows big variations, which must get smaller when closer to the ground. Tom van Doormaal
Yes exactly right
I'm curious as to why he wouldn't have chosen one of the many open fields that were clearly in view instead of such a tight place to land with all the shrubs & such a short distance. I watched his video on it & he described the runway length as 1,800 feet long but there were so many more obsticales compared to the field adjacent. While the video only shows as being shared by him 3 months ago the only other video's he shared are at least 6 years ago so this leas me to believe either he wasn't a novice or this was a much older video as lautoka63 has said.
Yeah sounds like it is an old video, and makes sense if this was his first outlanding. It’s not the end of the world being over the top of where you want to land as long as you join a circuit from overhead like normal. In NZ you need to be off to the side downwind so you can see and confirm the slope of the landing area.
If you look at the outside views at the end of the landing, you can see that the landing site was definitely wide enough and obstacle free (it is an ultralight airfield) and the surrounding fields all have quite a lot of big bushes growing on them, those can be a serious obstacle at this speed and they would probably destroy the plane upon landing. In my opinion he did the right decision regarding the landing site. Nevertheless there is a lack of flying technique mastery.
That first 14 seconds was like watching the first 14 minutes of Saving Private Ryan...harrowing.
That fin art tho... mind you STR8 wouldn't have looked any better in the 'after' photo.
Haha true :)
To Continue: ( from your glide ratio video comments ), this glider seems to be chop gun layup.
( maybe some severed light roving laminates, but the flexibility, or rigidity, of the wing structures is a variable.
Regardless of the outlanding planning here, he would have made it if he was profitient enough at least getting the glider to fly a straight line!
That would have helped a lot!
Hmm interesting! I think I have made this same mistake before! Being too focused on the aiming point and then aiming to hit it no matter what. Everything else goes out the window. I didnt see any check list, speed control looked all over the place assuming the centre instrument was speed but if it was sink then it still increased around the circuit and the angle on down wind was way too steep. All that stuff on the knee just gets in the way.
We all make mistakes! The trick is to do them with an instructor in the back :) Cheers!
Good video Tim with lots of lessons. When I first watched the flare it looked to be tipstall related roll rates especially given the nose attitude and control inputs unless a thermal was triggered in the vicinity of the right wing that caused the uncommanded left roll to begin with.
Keep up the good work.
Cheers mate! Yeah could have been, definitely out of control :)
Hi Tim, Since I haven't flown a glider yet, learning what to do to clean up that committed landing final is extremely hard for me to speculate. Obviously he was a fledgling pilot at the time of this incident. That was a painful lesson for him. Moving forward, I bet he learned to touchdown strait and not land sideways. That was a knock the wind out of you OUCH!
Absolutely! Yes this was a long time ago, so not doubt he's far more competent now. Good luck with your flying if you take it up!
@@PureGlide , I plan on this year finding someone that's setup to perform an introductory glider flight with me. Been a power aviator since 1966. I love sailing boats and feel that gliding will add a new learning dimension. I've learned techniques watching you and Bruno that's already paying off with powered flight enjoyment on X-Country flights. Thanks for your channel Tim, It's one of my favorites.
@@willhibbardii2450 awesome glad you’re enjoying it!
That was rough landing, lucky he didnt flip!
It sure was!
Agreed, it would have been a bad place to be injured...
Not a glider pilot, but when I was doing practice forced landings I made a lot of the same mistakes early on when I was working towards my RPL here in Australia. Keeping too tight of circuit around my picked paddock, being high on final etc. I guess when we are doing forced landing practice we effectively have a very inefficient glider.
Yeah there's not a lot of differences really! Same nerves, same skills required and decision making, just a few of the technical details are different :)
Student pilots fly very similarly - on their first five flights
Yes we often fall backwards in our abilities when under pressure
I'm glad there were no major injuries in this incident. I'm curious, is that damage repairable? Or is the glider a total loss?
Hi the glider was repaired and is flying again. This accident was years ago