The Quacks of Quedlinburg - Playthrough - slickerdrips
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 6 ก.ย. 2024
- Help to support the channel and keep more playthroughs coming: www.patreon.com/slickerdrips
A full 2 player game of The Quacks of Quedlinburg!
First Impressions: • The Quacks of Quedlinb...
Twitter: / slicker_drips
Facebook: / slickergames
Instagram: / slicker.drips
Find out more about Die Quacksalber von Quedlinburg here: boardgamegeek....
#boardgames #slickerdrips #tabletop
I’m so hyped for this to come out in English. Bag building + push your luck is 100% my jam. Thanks for the great video!
Thank you for the video, I don't always have patience to go through an entire playthrough, but this one got me til the end :) guess that means the game is good (and that you make good playthroughs!)
Recently discovered your channel and very much enjoy your playthroughs. Great work!!
Thanks for watching, Charlotte! :)
Great job, Tom! Definitely an interesting „variant“ to a deck builder.
At 38:58 You get a white 2 and only put it one space forward. It then gets returned to the bag at 39:10 and the mistake is hidden.
Good eye Andrew! Note added. Thanks for pointing it out!!
40:56 the Red token on the bottom left should be moved a space forward. It's a Red 2 + an orange/pumpkin (before), equaling a total of three.
Hi Michael! It was noted in the Klingon Subtitles at 40:22 when Marty took his turn and drew that Red 2. Thanks!
I know I noted it on the first impressions video, but I also want to note it here. This will be coming, in English, to North America, from North Star Games, this fall (October/November 2018). Thanks!
When you buy the coloured tokens you're allowed to buy up to 2 whenever you do buy them BUT not 2 of the same colour. You made an illegal move with Marty at the 49:20 mark.
I have added a note to the Klingon subtitles. Thanks!
@@theercs You're very welcome. Thanks for doing a great 2 player run through of this game. I can't wait to get my hands on an English copy today at my LGS.
Did the same thing at 26:25
Thanks @@andrewriley4735 !! I have moved the comment up to the earlier instance.