I can’t lie my English teacher is something else I learn so much in this video and the previous one i swear I will pay for this man English lessons, English is not my favourite subject it maths 🌚but I will still pay😊
I just came to thank you , English was not an easy subject for me due I came to the uk last year but one of my friends recommended me to watch you , I can really say you taught me so well to conquer this exams papers that even if I don’t passed I’ll be happy cause finally I understood what a teacher was explaining to me without the need of translation
@@A1._. You will not have to repeat yourself - it's either going to be one or the other (for this ques. it's better to write all your justified explanations for Source A, then introduce the 'in contrast' or 'nevertheless' to talk about Source B)👍 'In contrast' for differences or 'nevertheless' for similarities
Hi sir, could you please tell me how to improve as this Question 4 only received 10 marks from my teacher Both writers in sources A and B express different attitudes towards sweets. In source A the writer reminisces about how valuable sweets were in his own childhood ,whereas in source B the writer is much more focussed on the danger of sweets. These varied perspectives are expressed through the writers different choice in setting. In source A, the writer focuses most of the setting description to be concentrated in the outdoors: on the streets. The outdoors is commonly attributed with freedom and happiness which creates the impression that these sweets gave the children a feeling of freedom and joy, so much so that these children do not even feel the pain of the hot ''bubbles of tar''. Additionally, the writer claims that the inside of the ''Jaffa'', the most precious sweet in his view, was like ''planet earth''. When describing the inside of the ''Jaffa'' , the writer could be focussing on the physical insides of the sweet ,but could also perhaps be describing the 'core nature' of these sweets, as in what the 'Jaffa'' represents to each of these children, across the globe from ''America'' to ''England''.To the children, the ''Jaffa'' meant the world to them. Contrastingly, in source B, the writer choses the ONLY setting in the article to be the ''factory''. Factories are much more confined and have much more menacing undertones than the great outdoors which could show the writer's view that sweets are not a universal desire, but rather solely the desires of the ''child'':not the ''planet earth'' as in the eyes of the writer in source A. In addition to the choice of settings, the two writers differ through colour imagery as well, which effectively expresses their varied perspectives. In source A, the writer describes the ''crumble bar'' as a ''bright yellow shrapnel''. The ''bright yellow'' is often connoted with freedoms and new beginnings which emphasises the existing view that these sweets are a freeing force in the eyes of these children , and are so valuable that they are like ''china vases''. The added value of these sweets, alongside the use of hyperbolic language continue to express the writers view that these sweets are some of the most, if not the most valuable aspects of these children's lives and perhaps even sacred as they are described to be delicate and would have a lasting effect on the children if they were lost through the adjective 'frangible''. Again, this contrasts to source B where the writer views the ''brighter'' colours to be ''deadly'' due to the metallic ions within the sweets. They believe that the children's obsession with these sweets is ''petty''showing the disregard for the children's own enjoyment. Furthermore, they view the sweets to be made in a very methodical process as the artists ''squint'' whilst they ''coloured small sugar articles under the strict scrutiny of their supervisor's''. The sibilance in this long precise sentence reflects the sinister way that the writer views these sweets to be produced and almost accentuates the idea that the sweets are not made with care, but rather with a lack of love or care for the quality of the experience that the writer in source A thoroughly enjoyed. This methodical process also contrasts to the ''sublime'' nature of the sweets in source A, this gives the impression that the sweets' creation is not meant to be understood, but rather be enjoyed and lives through without extra thought. He believes the experience to be ''majestic'', rather than the writer in source B's view that sweets are loved because of the ''carbon contained within them''.The consonance of the phrase adds to the lac of love and feeling in the thought of the sweets.
@@imadchowdhury1936 yeah an actual examiner came to my school a few months ago and he said I'm easily getting a grade 9 with my work ,but my teacher says I'm barely at a 7
i think i ...ed up this question, i hopped from extract a and b so i didn't do on the other hand but i gave my point, for a and b , then evidence for a and b then explain for a and b and i developed it more for a and b i done this twice
It’s antiphrasis/irony. The opposite of what they mean but it’s obvious…if you understand lol like “his looks” contrasts with the idea of them not suiting him but actually I think it could be personification too because looks is usually a term we use for humans
do we need to find another difference for our next paragraph for q4? or can we still use the painful/serence dynamic and just use different quotes to analyse?
@@sudaniyaawhy can't you? Those that Mark won't know what you wrote for different question. A exam marker will have 2000 Question 4s and and another will have 2000 Question 3's and so on the one marking question 4 won't know what you out for question 3,2,1 and 5
I am going to cry that my both parents divorced and left me alone and empty handed I want to prison I have to look after my younger sister and which 2 months old"Y'all ain't like this, I'm the hybrid, party chillin' with my sidekicks I feel heightened, close to lightning, this the code and we don't fight it We engage it, yeah, we thrive it, this the weekend, don't deny it We ain't quiet, this our riot, this our wave and yeah, we ride it And we go dumb, dumb with the music, I feel honest, get a Truly That playlist, gotta choose it, this our moment, make a movie On that channel, better tune it, we go live and we go stupid like (too real) 2003, I was deep on the east side I had homies in the hood since I was knee high That's the reason I don't have to carry a weapon I went from a child to a man, to a legend (too real) Party after dark, now we roll, we don't smash now Party after dark, cut the lights, this the blackout Party after dark, we don't stop 'til we pass out Party after dark, welcome to the madhouse..
![เปิด อาณาจักร หมื่นล้าน "สาระตั้ม" l [Nickynachat]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3XE0nPF4YkQ/mqdefault.jpg)
I have my November mocks tomorrow and wish I had found this guy sooner. I can tell he will be a real help when the actual GCSE's come.
I love maths and hate english but his teachings is so high quality and engaging, in a way makes english enjoyable. :)
U should marry him 🔥🔥🔥
@@kalmachampicalo5548 bhahahahhahahahahahah
Fr this actually makes sense on what to do in english in my eng lessons i understand nothing
I feel like he makes it make sense for maths brains by basically making a checklist for essays
@@elizabethwright568 exactly, my english teacher is a pro waffler and never says anything relevant
If only my English teacher could teach as good as mr everything English
frr
The MR EVERYTHING IS THE BEST, went from Grade 5 to 9 in no joke 3 days cause of this guys. luv u bro
gay
@@hossshy haram
Fr
I can’t lie my English teacher is something else I learn so much in this video and the previous one i swear I will pay for this man English lessons, English is not my favourite subject it maths 🌚but I will still pay😊
you can donate money with super thanks
@@foxzy1469 face to face lessons teaching in general
your explanation is more specific and clearer than my teacher, thank you very much for your time. Bravo!
Watching your last Mr Everything English video is such a strange feeling
The most infamous question of the paper…
the video came out 1 day ago, how did you comment before it came out ????
@@hazzyuh2990 lmfao, i only just realised that now
@@hazzyuh2990 hes a time traveller
@@hazzyuh2990 probably commented before the video premiered
I just came to thank you , English was not an easy subject for me due I came to the uk last year but one of my friends recommended me to watch you , I can really say you taught me so well to conquer this exams papers that even if I don’t passed I’ll be happy cause finally I understood what a teacher was explaining to me without the need of translation
How r u now
Yip yip yip yip yip
yip yip yip 😥
I use it… “ Onomatopoeia”
@@otegaedwin same
@@abzinhoo it’s not.. becz it’s a sound that’s how hyenas do”
@@otegaedwin of course it’s still repetition what are you on about
my English teacher is on one, she was telling us to write 5 detailed paragraphs in 20 minutes
Same. I just dont understand how doing only 2 paragraphs (in detail ofc) can get 16 marks
@@DanielLijs BC ur doing prte twice in one, so ur basically doing two paragraphs in one
@@DanielLijs I would say intro then 2 paragraph brother
@@DanielLijs2 paragraphs and if u have 5-7 mins to spare then come back to q4 and write ur 3rd one
can u also talk about tone and how they communicate their message to the audience and it’s purpose?
I counted all the times you said "guys" in this video. The number came to 39 "guys" 😂
😂
get a job
😂😂😂
you are the coolest english teacher man
Anyone else here the night before the English lang p2 😭😭
Thankyou so much @Mr Everything English my grade for language went from a 1 to 9 just by watching these videos
ok
ok
ok
Why is everyone saying ok
@@imadchowdhury1936 ok
You teach really well 💕💗am learning alot
Sir is it can be both like different and similar ? If yes can u please go for similar one as well thanks 😊
doesn't matter - the structure is the same, even if its similar
@@pratyasha279 but people are scared of repeating themselves and no teacher goes over similarities
@@A1._. You will not have to repeat yourself - it's either going to be one or the other (for this ques. it's better to write all your justified explanations for Source A, then introduce the 'in contrast' or 'nevertheless' to talk about Source B)👍
'In contrast' for differences
or
'nevertheless' for similarities
Thank you so much sir actually i am new i uk and my english is not good so its help me alot.
i have to sleep cannot watch this video but dyu have to write structural and language devices for this question😭😭😭
11:57
i love your content mashalal
I guess I'm able to assume that "Technique" can be substituted for zoom?
legend of the field.
wait so in q4 do we analyse both structure and language or just language techniques????
yeah you can do both
@@theunknownchampion9492ohh yehh daddy 🤤🤤🙀🤭🫣 so long pee pee
In this quote the uses hyperbole to exaggerate the surprising emotions felt when inspecting the pee peeof the narrator
Should we not focus on analysis for this question
Hi sir, could you please tell me how to improve as this Question 4 only received 10 marks from my teacher
Both writers in sources A and B express different attitudes towards sweets. In source A the writer reminisces about how valuable sweets were in his own childhood ,whereas in source B the writer is much more focussed on the danger of sweets.
These varied perspectives are expressed through the writers different choice in setting. In source A, the writer focuses most of the setting description to be concentrated in the outdoors: on the streets. The outdoors is commonly attributed with freedom and happiness which creates the impression that these sweets gave the children a feeling of freedom and joy, so much so that these children do not even feel the pain of the hot ''bubbles of tar''. Additionally, the writer claims that the inside of the ''Jaffa'', the most precious sweet in his view, was like ''planet earth''. When describing the inside of the ''Jaffa'' , the writer could be focussing on the physical insides of the sweet ,but could also perhaps be describing the 'core nature' of these sweets, as in what the 'Jaffa'' represents to each of these children, across the globe from ''America'' to ''England''.To the children, the ''Jaffa'' meant the world to them.
Contrastingly, in source B, the writer choses the ONLY setting in the article to be the ''factory''. Factories are much more confined and have much more menacing undertones than the great outdoors which could show the writer's view that sweets are not a universal desire, but rather solely the desires of the ''child'':not the ''planet earth'' as in the eyes of the writer in source A.
In addition to the choice of settings, the two writers differ through colour imagery as well, which effectively expresses their varied perspectives. In source A, the writer describes the ''crumble bar'' as a ''bright yellow shrapnel''. The ''bright yellow'' is often connoted with freedoms and new beginnings which emphasises the existing view that these sweets are a freeing force in the eyes of these children , and are so valuable that they are like ''china vases''. The added value of these sweets, alongside the use of hyperbolic language continue to express the writers view that these sweets are some of the most, if not the most valuable aspects of these children's lives and perhaps even sacred as they are described to be delicate and would have a lasting effect on the children if they were lost through the adjective 'frangible''. Again, this contrasts to source B where the writer views the ''brighter'' colours to be ''deadly'' due to the metallic ions within the sweets. They believe that the children's obsession with these sweets is ''petty''showing the disregard for the children's own enjoyment.
Furthermore, they view the sweets to be made in a very methodical process as the artists ''squint'' whilst they ''coloured small sugar articles under the strict scrutiny of their supervisor's''. The sibilance in this long precise sentence reflects the sinister way that the writer views these sweets to be produced and almost accentuates the idea that the sweets are not made with care, but rather with a lack of love or care for the quality of the experience that the writer in source A thoroughly enjoyed. This methodical process also contrasts to the ''sublime'' nature of the sweets in source A, this gives the impression that the sweets' creation is not meant to be understood, but rather be enjoyed and lives through without extra thought. He believes the experience to be ''majestic'', rather than the writer in source B's view that sweets are loved because of the ''carbon contained within them''.The consonance of the phrase adds to the lac of love and feeling in the thought of the sweets.
‘I ain’t reading allat’
In my opinion I don't think it's 10 marks your teacher is strict on marking. Idky but school teachers are ungenerous with giving out marks.
That looks really good, I think your teacher was just strict with the marking
@@thethreellamas5186 I mean that made me feel a little less stressed for language paper 2, I thought I was doing everything terribly wrong.
@@imadchowdhury1936 yeah an actual examiner came to my school a few months ago and he said I'm easily getting a grade 9 with my work ,but my teacher says I'm barely at a 7
i think i ...ed up this question, i hopped from extract a and b so i didn't do on the other hand but i gave my point, for a and b , then evidence for a and b then explain for a and b and i developed it more for a and b i done this twice
Sir, we need some quiet lift music in the background whilst you write.
guys is "his looks did not suit him" personification?
i wrote that in my paper 1 question 2 but im having second thoughts
It’s antiphrasis/irony. The opposite of what they mean but it’s obvious…if you understand lol like “his looks” contrasts with the idea of them not suiting him but actually I think it could be personification too because looks is usually a term we use for humans
@@Oliviamth omds thanks so much its been on my mind for so long fr
gl on all future exams bro all the best
Sir could you put that 16 mark model answer you displayed into the description? I think a couple of lines were cut off at the end.
so would you basically structure this the same way you would for a poetry essay
thank you for these videos, but I think it would be easier to remember PETE instead of PRTE replacing r (reference) with e (evidence) ?
I think it's because you don't actually have to include evidence you can just refer to parts of the text rather than quotes
This video was useful thank you❤️🔥
For techniques can I use subject terminology
Can you give a similarity even thought it says “compare their different attitudes”
no if it says differences you only compare the differences
no
do we need to find another difference for our next paragraph for q4? or can we still use the painful/serence dynamic and just use different quotes to analyse?
For section B same quotes,can pathetic Fallacy is used as technique??
how much marks would you lose for not putting dear or regards in question 5
Depends
A fair few marks for form and structure
Thank you! 😊
This is the only teacher who doesn't waffle
sir is it applicable for IGCSE EDEXCEL english B too?
plz i need a reply asap,im just confused abt the structure
ur never gonna know lol (im gatekeeping)
Sir, can you use the same quotes that you've used in Q2 and Q3?
No you can’t
@@sudaniyaawhy can't you?
Those that Mark won't know what you wrote for different question.
A exam marker will have 2000 Question 4s and and another will have 2000 Question 3's and so on the one marking question 4 won't know what you out for question 3,2,1 and 5
tip for people cramming the night before: put the video in 2x speed
my brain isnt functioning imma sleeeeep
this video was really helpful but do you have to plan this answer at all
No you’re not expected to plan it
Would this question be easy right, since there’s more to speak about?
ok
no
Can you show next time where aqa mark them on which line
Where can we find link to the two sources please?
Sir this really helps, but can you please write a little bit more neatly
so do we zoom on a specific word or no??
Just wanna ask Sir, Is reference the same thing as evidence?
obviously😭😭
but my english teacher said do 5 im so confused
Silly question but we are meant to do 2 paragraphs using different quotes right?
Yes
Do we just need to talk about language or both language and structure
Both
POV: when I do revise outside the exam hall 😂
but are the techiques just language or structure as well
both if you want
is it possible to write this without the language involved? like can you just compare the similarities and what not?
it says compare HOW writers… so you must talk about the methods that have been used
that would be q2 basically q4 is about the methods/techniques used by both writers
My teacher asked us to do PEE 4 paragraphs
Terrible method lmao
do you need a thesis statement?
no
For some reason I'm watching after the exam??
Sir wat does PEIEIE mean
Point evidence infer
I am going to cry that my both parents divorced and left me alone and empty handed I want to prison I have to look after my younger sister and which 2 months old"Y'all ain't like this, I'm the hybrid, party chillin' with my sidekicks I feel heightened, close to lightning, this the code and we don't fight it We engage it, yeah, we thrive it, this the weekend, don't deny it We ain't quiet, this our riot, this our wave and yeah, we ride it And we go dumb, dumb with the music, I feel honest, get a Truly That playlist, gotta choose it, this our moment, make a movie On that channel, better tune it, we go live and we go stupid like (too real) 2003, I was deep on the east side I had homies in the hood since I was knee high That's the reason I don't have to carry a weapon I went from a child to a man, to a legend (too real) Party after dark, now we roll, we don't smash now Party after dark, cut the lights, this the blackout Party after dark, we don't stop 'til we pass out Party after dark, welcome to the madhouse..
wtf
wtf
man
Umm
???🤨??????????🤨???
THIS ENGLISH LANGUAGE US JUST YAPPING YAPPIN AND YAPPIN😂
is Q4 language or structure or both
It’s neither, it’s comparison
You can write about anything, language or structure because your can talk about structural viewpoints
is q2 the same as q4?
Q2 is just a summary without language or structural devices but Q4 is comparing the 2 sources using both devices
question 4 is a buffet
YOOOOOOOOOOO VERULAMMM SCHOOL LADS WHO KNOWS ABR MISS AVERY
Which paper is it please ?
english language paper 2
@@jakkutaira which source is it please, where could i find the paper
@@FatimahZaa-tt7tq oh thats what you meant, sorry i cant help you there mb for misunderstandng
Paper 2 bro
November 2021 is the one he's doing in the video I believe, and in the live I think he's doing June 2021 but I could be wrong
2:00
🐐
Goat
Sir! I can’t read your handwriting 🙁
Ur dyslexic
...
fgs why dont you zoom
icl ima do my own thing two prte paragraphs and 1 prtezel paragraph
@@Hassan-xu8rnyour cooked buddy
@@Hassan-xu8rn hey! what grade did u end up getting if u dont mind me asking?
@@moonstraders2089 language I got a 7 and literature I got an 8
i hate maths
?
no
THANK YOU!
Why did you get Eva fired
@@zayd8002 i promise i’m a changed person now
@@sheilabirling I believe you tbh I think you and your brother have changed widely
@@zayd8002 thank you!! i really appreciate that 🙏
@@sheilabirling nws and keep up the maturity and anti capitalist views