Would you keep this deck just how it is or would you add primeval planet to it? If so what card or cards would you take out for it & what other cards/ card ratios would you add/change if you were to make any?
@@zephyrwargamesyugioh Awesome thanks man I love your deck profiles! What about on the ratios of Scream, Silliak & Cryme would you keep them the same or add more?
What are your thoughts on playing an adamancipator risen dragite, a chaos angel & a millennium eyes restrict in this deck? To protect you from going off with your combos
Imo chaos angel is better suited for a bystial version. Dragite is a good option to protect mainly from evenly, but can offer a nice route of disruption to your end board. Instant into Millennium is good, issue is consistency to getting to Instant
@@zephyrwargamesyugioh Do you think summoning into a millennium eyes restrict through a tear fusion summon & a risen dragite first before going with your Minerva effect is a possible consistent board to make to protect Minerva effect from going off? Currently running a 43 card Tearsworn deck
@kevinvelez-wk5bv it could be helpful yeah, I'd probs say go for the Grepha dragon over millenium tho as it's an omni so can do the job of bith Milennium and Dragite. Issue is to make both your Mills would need to be epic, Where as minerva is such a HT Baiter that your probs better making it first and eating the HTs without using your normal and then do ham woth your normal
If use instant fusion to summon millennium eyes restrict then use its effect that same turn it was summoned with instant fusion does he stay on the field at the end of that turn or does it get destroyed due to instant fusion?
@@kevinvelez-wk5bv depends on the locals, Id aim for floodgate HTs or turn skip trap slike Dbarrier - Board breakers like Harpies, Lightning and then Cards that benefit from being milled, like bystials
Hey! I haven't played the game in 4ish years. Was curious how much building something like this would cost me (lightsworn has always been my favourite deck)
The origonal Lightsworns not so much as they have all been reprinted and the deck will be next week. The tear stuff and the new lightswon stuff your looking at approx £100 so total of around 200 id say
Thanks! After looking some stuff on cardmarket, I assume the main costly engine pieces are the 3ofs in the tear section and the dragonlings (10-15 each) in the lightsworn segment (I haven't looked up any of the extra deck stuff). I do already have most of the lightsworn main deck pieces from back in the day I think. If I were to build up either pure tear or pure lightsworn in the beginning (not sure I want to commit 200 right away, but half of that might be fine), which one would you recommend? Also, I assume the bystial engine is even more pricey, right?
@@explosionspin3422 Yeah Bystials get costly to, Id aim for the new lightsworn stuff for now as the deck is fully playable on its own which is nice and means you dont need to worry to much about punishment dragon, unless you already have.
I like tearsworn decks, but your amount of bricks is craazy. I always look at my worst 5 cards in my deck and think what board would I make with them. In your case, drawing any combination of tearkash/wulf/felis/tearlament spells/tearlament traps thats 10 cards in your deck.. and thats a lot of completely dead hands as apposed to semi dead hands. If you are drawing 2 bricks per opening hand and you go up against even 1 negate/hand trap, you don't have many options. I do looove Revolution Synchron, but why are you not playing Naturia Beast? to synchro with Mudragon, Theres Ancient Fairy Dragon to switch Kash + Tear Field spells, and extend through your normal summon negation, then turn fairy into armitara with revo to then keep going. In my build and here I think Wulf could be cut to 1, and I would think about how you would extend with Athenian and one lv4. Sometimes you've already used Weiss, and can only get 1 summon off Athenian, sometimes not even a tuner. These scenarios are real. I used to like the King of the Swamp Package for Chimera, but ended up not liking the whole deck as bricks. Edit: Your not running Chimera in this build?. Did I witness zero PreDragost. Your tearlaments are going to be pseudo dead mills in consideration. I think your Lightsworn are undercooked and a bit raw Edit 2:Looking even more at your package its super wonky. If you use King of the swamps to add a poly, what can you fuse into to then get double benefit from the grave. Your only other options are.... hope to the ygo gods you drew a second aqua, or drew 2 king of the swamps? This deck is kind of mid now I've re-looked at it, it is very undercooked :'( WHERES THE LAMB SAUCE!
First respect for the Gordan Ramsey reference made me chuckle. In response to most of your points they refer more to a more tear centered deck, this one they are pretty much the supporting characters to Lightsworn so the focus on their fusions isn't so prominent. The rev + muddragon is kwl but the use for rev in this deck is crystal wing protect as Rev + any Level 4 gets you that. The reason for no tear or kash field spell is they are completely dead if milled and that's the aim of this deck with the easy mill 12 combo (plus at the time of recording we didn't have the tear spell reprinted and I wasn't going to pay £20 per for a card just over a week away being super haha. KOS engine as mentioned not the biggest fan of myself and ultimately it's only in there for replacment of kitkalos name mainly.
Hey you shouldnt play so many decks , stick to 5 and keep track of them / master them . Imagine your decks would get new support at once and you would need to relearn and buy everything haha
But then if you consistently bounce around ones for casual fun and master the ones you play competitively you don get bored of any one deck/lose interest, for me helps me keep it fresh, learn and try up new strategies
![Yu-Gi-Oh! Regional 1st Place WINNER: Volcanic FTK Deck Profile [ft. Ricardo McBride] Fort Worth TX](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/aMnm3QuvrCw/mqdefault.jpg)
![Yu-Gi-Oh! Regional 1st Place WINNER: Volcanic FTK Deck Profile [ft. Ricardo McBride] Fort Worth TX](/img/tr.png)
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 89 | คู่เอก "ยอดไอคิว vs คิริลล์"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Z3vYkHJ_5Ig/mqdefault.jpg)
Would you keep this deck just how it is or would you add primeval planet to it? If so what card or cards would you take out for it & what other cards/ card ratios would you add/change if you were to make any?
Yeah Id probs play 3 of it and cut back on reinoheart to 2 - raiden to 1 and swamp to 2
@@zephyrwargamesyugioh
Awesome thanks man I love your deck profiles! What about on the ratios of Scream, Silliak & Cryme would you keep them the same or add more?
@@kevinvelez-wk5bv probs cut the crime tbh, it's probs better in a bystial version where you can banish more, could replace with a 2nd Suliek
What are your thoughts on playing an adamancipator risen dragite, a chaos angel & a millennium eyes restrict in this deck? To protect you from going off with your combos
Imo chaos angel is better suited for a bystial version.
Dragite is a good option to protect mainly from evenly, but can offer a nice route of disruption to your end board.
Instant into Millennium is good, issue is consistency to getting to Instant
@@zephyrwargamesyugioh
Do you think summoning into a millennium eyes restrict through a tear fusion summon & a risen dragite first before going with your Minerva effect is a possible consistent board to make to protect Minerva effect from going off? Currently running a 43 card Tearsworn deck
@kevinvelez-wk5bv it could be helpful yeah, I'd probs say go for the Grepha dragon over millenium tho as it's an omni so can do the job of bith Milennium and Dragite.
Issue is to make both your Mills would need to be epic,
Where as minerva is such a HT Baiter that your probs better making it first and eating the HTs without using your normal and then do ham woth your normal
@@zephyrwargamesyugioh
Ah ok thanks for your input
If use instant fusion to summon millennium eyes restrict then use its effect that same turn it was summoned with instant fusion does he stay on the field at the end of that turn or does it get destroyed due to instant fusion?
I love it
What bystial package would you use with this deck?
3 lubellion, 1 regained, 1 of each of the rest
Awesome thank you
Do you prefer the deck just how it is or with the bystial package instead?
Personally I prefer the 60 card version, more variety
@@zephyrwargamesyugioh
What side deck do you run for this deck?
@@kevinvelez-wk5bv depends on the locals, Id aim for floodgate HTs or turn skip trap slike Dbarrier - Board breakers like Harpies, Lightning and then Cards that benefit from being milled, like bystials
I feel sketchy about investing in rev synchron bc it seems like something that will be limited. with the once per duel eff etc..
jet synchron has the same clause and thats at 3.
If anything hang out for the tins inn september should be in that
Hey! I haven't played the game in 4ish years. Was curious how much building something like this would cost me (lightsworn has always been my favourite deck)
The origonal Lightsworns not so much as they have all been reprinted and the deck will be next week.
The tear stuff and the new lightswon stuff your looking at approx £100
so total of around 200 id say
Thanks!
After looking some stuff on cardmarket, I assume the main costly engine pieces are the 3ofs in the tear section and the dragonlings (10-15 each) in the lightsworn segment (I haven't looked up any of the extra deck stuff). I do already have most of the lightsworn main deck pieces from back in the day I think.
If I were to build up either pure tear or pure lightsworn in the beginning (not sure I want to commit 200 right away, but half of that might be fine), which one would you recommend? Also, I assume the bystial engine is even more pricey, right?
@@explosionspin3422 Yeah Bystials get costly to, Id aim for the new lightsworn stuff for now as the deck is fully playable on its own which is nice and means you dont need to worry to much about punishment dragon, unless you already have.
I like tearsworn decks, but your amount of bricks is craazy. I always look at my worst 5 cards in my deck and think what board would I make with them. In your case, drawing any combination of tearkash/wulf/felis/tearlament spells/tearlament traps thats 10 cards in your deck.. and thats a lot of completely dead hands as apposed to semi dead hands. If you are drawing 2 bricks per opening hand and you go up against even 1 negate/hand trap, you don't have many options.
I do looove Revolution Synchron, but why are you not playing Naturia Beast? to synchro with Mudragon, Theres Ancient Fairy Dragon to switch Kash + Tear Field spells, and extend through your normal summon negation, then turn fairy into armitara with revo to then keep going.
In my build and here I think Wulf could be cut to 1, and I would think about how you would extend with Athenian and one lv4. Sometimes you've already used Weiss, and can only get 1 summon off Athenian, sometimes not even a tuner. These scenarios are real.
I used to like the King of the Swamp Package for Chimera, but ended up not liking the whole deck as bricks.
Edit: Your not running Chimera in this build?. Did I witness zero PreDragost. Your tearlaments are going to be pseudo dead mills in consideration. I think your Lightsworn are undercooked and a bit raw
Edit 2:Looking even more at your package its super wonky. If you use King of the swamps to add a poly, what can you fuse into to then get double benefit from the grave. Your only other options are.... hope to the ygo gods you drew a second aqua, or drew 2 king of the swamps? This deck is kind of mid now I've re-looked at it, it is very undercooked :'( WHERES THE LAMB SAUCE!
First respect for the Gordan Ramsey reference made me chuckle.
In response to most of your points they refer more to a more tear centered deck, this one they are pretty much the supporting characters to Lightsworn so the focus on their fusions isn't so prominent.
The rev + muddragon is kwl but the use for rev in this deck is crystal wing protect as Rev + any Level 4 gets you that.
The reason for no tear or kash field spell is they are completely dead if milled and that's the aim of this deck with the easy mill 12 combo (plus at the time of recording we didn't have the tear spell reprinted and I wasn't going to pay £20 per for a card just over a week away being super haha.
KOS engine as mentioned not the biggest fan of myself and ultimately it's only in there for replacment of kitkalos name mainly.
Do dino thunder next!
Fiiirst ❤❤
Rip tear kash
Beastking is much better than king of the swamp
Yeah said that loads sadly I don't have any and F paying 5-7 per copy haha, hopefully ots25
The main difference between them is beastking being lv4, isn't it?
@@benjaminkuch2558 correct so is a more useful summon for xyz plays
I use Versago the destroyer because he's a dark monster which let's me play my chaos extenders
Hey you shouldnt play so many decks , stick to 5 and keep track of them / master them . Imagine your decks would get new support at once and you would need to relearn and buy everything haha
But then if you consistently bounce around ones for casual fun and master the ones you play competitively you don get bored of any one deck/lose interest, for me helps me keep it fresh, learn and try up new strategies
@@zephyrwargamesyugioh This Zeph^