Aug 11. NOAA found a Japanese WWII ship wreck!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 ส.ค. 2016
  • The Amakasu Maru 1. A water tanker from port Yokohama. Depth: 1000 m.
    Report: oer.hpc.msstate.edu/okeanos/e...
    www.combinedfleet.com/Amakasu_...
    Music: IH_Meditation

ความคิดเห็น • 221

  • @muruwakajp
    @muruwakajp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    9:35 "DAIICHI AMAKASU MARU"(第一あまかす丸)was a water supply vessel. Thank you for finding our old vessel.
    We always pray for world peace.

  • @northernyeti8280
    @northernyeti8280 6 ปีที่แล้ว +46

    Amazing state of preservation and water clarity! Thank you for sharing!

    • @irishstew5867
      @irishstew5867 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The water is so clear because the Pacific is dead, due to atom-bomb testing and the amount of radioactive water (billions of gallons) still being flushed into the ocean by the power plant meltdown in Fukushima. Although not tested in years, radioactivity reached 200 miles from the American coast-line.

  • @gojyodan
    @gojyodan 5 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    japanese tanker amakasu-maruNo.1 was nov. 1942  sunk by ss-201 triton near wake Island

  • @kennysherrill6542
    @kennysherrill6542 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Very good, love the clear water and the length of footage, it gives a good view of everything. 👍👍👍👍👍

  • @gravesclayton3604
    @gravesclayton3604 4 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    Thank you for the diving details provided at top! This is a great view of this long lost ship. R.I.P. to the crew for their sacrifice.

  • @josephhanley8461
    @josephhanley8461 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Amazing pictures and the back ground music is amazing

  • @RhodeIslandWildlife
    @RhodeIslandWildlife 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent, thank you. The attached PDF was helpful.

  • @daretolive9357
    @daretolive9357 4 ปีที่แล้ว +143

    Look , it still holds water. after all those years.

    • @codyking4848
      @codyking4848 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      There is even still fresh fish in the galley!

    • @Beemer917
      @Beemer917 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      LMAO! Beautiful!

    • @garymckee8857
      @garymckee8857 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      They made them to last back then.

    • @slighter
      @slighter 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@nickramundo6720 No need to fight old wars all over again. Let the past rest and try to be less discriminative against people of other groups.

    • @jwhoward182
      @jwhoward182 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      slighter I am with you right up to subject of Japan’s involvement in this war. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_history_textbook_controversies This a summary view - with potentially some minor errors associated with the wiki process. However, Japan’s shrine to Tojo and his boys still stands and their memory defended. It took decades to acknowledge Nanking 1937.

  • @RayVal53
    @RayVal53 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Its incredible this was picked up from one anomaly on the miltibeam point display. Makes you wonder how many others are missed, wrecks and their ghosts, hoping to one day see light again.

    • @MrOiram46
      @MrOiram46 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      We still have yet to find Shinano, the largest aircraft carrier of its time

    • @tomthx5804
      @tomthx5804 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Five

  • @larrydriemel6242
    @larrydriemel6242 4 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    first camera I ever saw and used was a brownie box camera , now look at what they can do ,amazing !!

    • @larrydriemel6242
      @larrydriemel6242 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      I wonder how many people watching this know what a brownie box camera is , just curious ....an old guy question. but this filming is truely incredible

    • @jaddy540
      @jaddy540 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I well remember them! Age 98 now. Kodak actually GAVE the cameras away, so they could make money selling the film, and processing fees. As a native of Rochester,NY, home of Kodak, I worked for them on 2 occasions until going to GM, where I prospered well. even w/o a degree.

  • @skdinterceptor2828
    @skdinterceptor2828 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great footage.....crystal clear......

  • @kelliebrooks9094
    @kelliebrooks9094 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you nice photography good lighting

  • @ja601h
    @ja601h 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Daiichi Amakasu mar (第一あまかす丸).

  • @cal-qw8ov
    @cal-qw8ov 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The state of preservation is remarkable..

  • @danielmelhorn7988
    @danielmelhorn7988 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    great musical effects

  • @clifforddodson5459
    @clifforddodson5459 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Super clear water!

  • @sreed8570
    @sreed8570 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    nice rov footage,, its surprisingly intact considering the growth of sealife present.

  • @yanggyan9729
    @yanggyan9729 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    UNBELIEVABLE QUALITÀ,GRAZIE

  • @paulhoffman778
    @paulhoffman778 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very peaceful music well done.

  • @ingohiller3415
    @ingohiller3415 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Good photographs

  • @claudesmoot1880
    @claudesmoot1880 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this, I love under water video.

  • @jamesswingle3411
    @jamesswingle3411 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great, detailed, well lit

  • @charletonzimmerman4205
    @charletonzimmerman4205 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    A little, SPRAY-ON- "Flex shield" & good as NEW!

  • @fredwinter850
    @fredwinter850 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Lights out and you would not see a thing. It's really deep.

  • @bubba22987
    @bubba22987 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    And cargo still intact.

  • @haraldpettersen3649
    @haraldpettersen3649 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Amazing Video 🧐

  • @henerymag
    @henerymag 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    She was part of a convoy in the Formosa Strait which was attacked by 2 U.S. submarines. The 'Bang' (SS-385) sunk her and the Sakea Maru. The Redfish(SS-395) sank the Hozan Maru. November 23 1944

    • @MrT8T3R
      @MrT8T3R 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      My friend's father served on the Bang.

    • @webbtrekker534
      @webbtrekker534 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Well, according to Alden (page 25) she was sunk on December 24, at 9AM in the morning by the USS Triton SS 201. It was a daylight attack using the periscope and 3 torpedoes were fired.
      The Bang sank the Amakasa (note spelling) on November 23, 1944 at 2AM in a night surface attack. (3 torpedoes fired). Bang made 5 attacks that night and Redfish sank the Cargo ship Hozan of about 2500 tons 2 hours before..

    • @WALTERBROADDUS
      @WALTERBROADDUS 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@webbtrekker534 Thanks for the info. Needed some context.

    • @michaelhearne1960
      @michaelhearne1960 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Didn't the US Navy have reliability issues with their Torpedoes during WW2 Obviously not the ones that sank this ship though

    • @WALTERBROADDUS
      @WALTERBROADDUS 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@michaelhearne1960 correct

  • @TheBennedy85
    @TheBennedy85 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Its amazing to think that that ship was onced manned and a fully functioning workplace for those soldiers.

    • @00GrnGT
      @00GrnGT 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      *Sailors

  • @rucusrucus6191
    @rucusrucus6191 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Good ole lead based paint still clinging on.

  • @hoodoo2001
    @hoodoo2001 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    About 3,000 Japanese WWII wrecks out there.

  • @jimacheson4933
    @jimacheson4933 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Awesome!

  • @delboytrotter8806
    @delboytrotter8806 6 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    War is hell!

  • @fateh-singh-8115
    @fateh-singh-8115 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Vry nice clearly all picture

  • @briansteffmagnussen9078
    @briansteffmagnussen9078 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    It seem like a single projectile and an internal explosion took her down as she where sailing. Some deck personnel must be killed, but most likely the main part of the crew have managed to survive the sinking. The open doors on the ship prove that engine men had time to get out.

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      12 crew members died.

    • @roadsweeper1
      @roadsweeper1 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      She was torpedoed... that's known, but yeah I agree, doesnt look like a normal torpedo hit, they usually leave quite a large hole. It was sunk in '42, so they were probably still using magnetic detonators. I'm wondering if the warhead went off slightly early. I would have originally said that, that was concussive damage from a near miss from a bomb, the side plating had clearly been pushed in from a conclusive blast. But having since read she was definitely sunk by a sub, not an aircraft, maybe the torps warhead detonated early, and the concussion wave from the blast ruptured the side, sinking her anyway through flooding.

    • @craftpaint1644
      @craftpaint1644 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      And there are people who think Supply units just played cards throughout the war ♦️♣️♣️♣️♥️🥴

  • @crayoutlaw6865
    @crayoutlaw6865 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's crazy to think people are still in there

  • @user-su4og7bt6z
    @user-su4og7bt6z 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    very nice!

  • @davidmarshall1259
    @davidmarshall1259 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    it wasn't known at the time but, when the war was coming to a close, many Japanese ship were transporting pow's in the pacific. hatches were sealed tight and the conditions were terrible for those being transported. but many of these ships were seen as easy targets for roaming aircraft and were attacked accordingly. little did they know that many of those ships that went down took their cargo into the depths with them. such is war.

    • @tigtrager6923
      @tigtrager6923 6 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      They had no honor for anyone, to include civilians. Brutal treatment and cruelty was what they unleashed on everyone.

    • @Wombat1916
      @Wombat1916 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      101327 I read recently that some American airmen shot down during the Battle of Midway were fished out of the sea by the Japanese, tortured and interrogated then shot and dropped overboard. I don't know if that really happened though.

    • @imjusttoodissgusted5620
      @imjusttoodissgusted5620 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      My cousin was one of 80 survivors of the Shinyo Maru (not sure of spelling) He said the Japanese were picking up their survivors and shooting ours. he dove under when the came towards him. he was captured at Bataan.

    • @algrayson8965
      @algrayson8965 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @101327 - Since the advent of powered ships sailors are chiefly machine operators. Very rarely do they ram and board another warship.
      In the sail days battles at sea got downright bloody. The marines did the initial boarding, then one of the crews of sailors of each warship would get in on the hacking, slicing and stabbing. The other crew had to operate the ship.

  • @tomdooley3522
    @tomdooley3522 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Beautiful haunting music , the guns are silent now , her hull sleeps in the deep , the quarrel with the Enemy Is pass.

  • @josephdelage2057
    @josephdelage2057 ปีที่แล้ว

    Belles photos

  • @mistergrendel32
    @mistergrendel32 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    There are various scenes showing the Explorer around the vessel. Who is filming that footage ?

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      An ROV from NOAA ship Okeanos Explorer.

  • @davy1458
    @davy1458 6 ปีที่แล้ว +70

    Imagine what goes thru ones mind as water begins pouring in thru the ventilation ducts as you feel the room your inside of begining to roll over. Knowing the door in and out is latched and dogged down from the other side. How horrible of a scenario such as this played out in many sailors last moments of life....i get a sick feeling at simply imagining being in such a situation...then I realize that someone played the price and took on all that panic and fear of that horrible death so that I wouldn't have to. Someone paid the ultimate price for us to sit here and play around on TH-cam, and chase our dreams and fall in love like its something we are entitled to.....oh how selfish we are...how absurd and arrogant a human I must be to live out my life without realizing my every breath is a gift granted or paid for by someone else. God gave me my life, Jesus gave me my salvation and my grandparents generation gave me the freedom to be what ever I want to be in this life...which is why its important we live to be greater than just a common selfish asshole. The world has on overwhelming surplus of selfish assholes....be greater than that. Its how we pay our debt to those we owe.

    • @m.s.l.7746
      @m.s.l.7746 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      davy1458 why would they be locked in their own ship? Also why would the does only work from the outside?

    • @Cola64
      @Cola64 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      M. S. L. His entire rambling was just to put the whole religion aspect into the video....I am only curious to know if all the fuel is still in her tanks...

    • @johnkoenig9649
      @johnkoenig9649 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Somebody's got waaaaay too much time on his hands...

    • @mikemanners1069
      @mikemanners1069 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      davy1458...don't listen to these clueless assholes commenting against you. I feel your empathy for the dead. To be in touch with History and remembering the loss...that is something these degenerates cannot feel. Peace.

    • @salvatorericca8353
      @salvatorericca8353 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@mikemanners1069 I second that! Amen.

  • @olegrov6910
    @olegrov6910 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    SUPER!!!

  • @rosscocronin2097
    @rosscocronin2097 6 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Very ghostly

  • @ps2hacker
    @ps2hacker ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It looks like it got hit by a torpedo, then burned for a while before it sank.

  • @ULTRA_2112
    @ULTRA_2112 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    8:29 OKOHAMA...sure! It is Yokohama!

  • @leica3c
    @leica3c 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Laydownkeel:1939.4.25:complete:1940.2.6sink:1942.12.24nearwakeiland torpedored USS TRITON

  • @bigdog517
    @bigdog517 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Where do you get this footage?

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      From live ROV dives. oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/livestreams/welcome.html

  • @davidwillow6933
    @davidwillow6933 6 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Down among the dead men , !

  • @martineastburn3679
    @martineastburn3679 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Looks like a 'tender' or an 'oiller'. A great many motors on deck to pull in wire rope. Valves on the side likely to transfer fuel or oils.

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good observation! It was a water tanker from port Yokohama.

  • @letsexchangecansandbadadvi4245
    @letsexchangecansandbadadvi4245 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Are there bodies in storage compartments inside it??

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Maybe...I don't know.
      12 Crew members have lost their life.

  • @fredwinter850
    @fredwinter850 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    3,280 feet deep.

  • @Dunstire
    @Dunstire 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    It's a shame that the technology doesn't yet exist to be able to scuba-dive to these insane depths and look around without needing an ROV.It would be mind-blowing.I'm sure the day will come

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Shipwrecks and war graves will be looted in a blink of an eye.

    • @Dunstire
      @Dunstire 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@2011ACVVV I doubt that that even if it ever were possible,the kind of vermin that would do that kind of thing would ever be skilled enough or able to afford it

    • @steveb6103
      @steveb6103 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Dunstire Many ships that are in shallow water have been removed by scrapers! Mostly in the Java sea. Grave robbers only see the money even when they find bones with the steel.

  • @johnwick-ii6il
    @johnwick-ii6il ปีที่แล้ว

    Still has water in the tanks.

  • @fredwood1490
    @fredwood1490 ปีที่แล้ว

    The bones of the Fisherman lay with the bones of his fishing boat, deep beneath the waves. Only the fish win.

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It was a water carrier.

    • @fredwood1490
      @fredwood1490 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@2011ACVVV There used to one of those that docked and filled at the old dry dock at Roosevelt Rhodes, along with a water barge, for the dry Virgin Islands. I was wondering what kind of a ship it was. Thanks a lot! The poem was about any ship, really, just an allusion to purpose and life and death at sea.

  • @Nutzkie2001
    @Nutzkie2001 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Clear torpedo damage visible at the 3:35 mark.

    • @daniellitvinenko3478
      @daniellitvinenko3478 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Steve Cope I wonder if the ammunition survived till today

    • @ritzvillelumber5122
      @ritzvillelumber5122 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      looks more like bomb damage. hull was bent in not out. but it was sunk by a us sub.

    • @christophermckeon9030
      @christophermckeon9030 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Impact damage not explosive. Plus torpedoes were designed to go off under the hull not poke a ship in the side. If it did the target area is under silt.

    • @ritzvillelumber5122
      @ritzvillelumber5122 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@christophermckeon9030 The first part of the war the torpedoes were made to do that. But too many did not work. So we stopped using them and used contact. but even those had a problem. There is many books written about our poor quality torpedoes. Sad but true.

    • @christophermckeon9030
      @christophermckeon9030 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ritzvillelumber5122 Aye, that's true, but in Dec 1942 magnetic exploders were still being used on the majority of torpedoes as Bu-Ord was refusing investigation for CYA purposes...even tho some skippers removed the magnetic exploders against regulations. If you read the Triton's log they report in Dec 1942 one torpedo that exploded halfway to a target (a magnetic exploder issue), and four that hit or appeared to hit but failed to detonate (that's a contact exploder problem) (issuu.com/hnsa/docs/ss-201_triton, pp 142-43). These were different ships. One could surmise the Triton was firing a mix of torps that were magnetic and non-magnetic. Wikipedia notes this ship was sunk when one torp hit "under the stack" and another "under the foremast" but it isn't clear if the detonations were beneath the keel in those spots or contact hits along the hull, not to mention wikipedia contradicts the Triton's log.

  • @rancors1
    @rancors1 6 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    looks like she was taken out by a torpedo from a US sub. Lots of thirsty soldiers after-I wonder if any of her crew made it?

    • @Dog.soldier1950
      @Dog.soldier1950 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hope not

    • @thearmoredgeorgian2736
      @thearmoredgeorgian2736 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      12 died

    • @wirelessone2986
      @wirelessone2986 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thearmoredgeorgian2736 How many survived?

    • @thearmoredgeorgian2736
      @thearmoredgeorgian2736 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wirelessone2986 not sure, I don’t do much research on ships anymore(I’m more into armor and planes now) and this was just a fact I scrounged up.

    • @ostrich67
      @ostrich67 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@wirelessone2986 This type of ship would have had a crew of 30-50 men.

  • @kelliebrooks9094
    @kelliebrooks9094 ปีที่แล้ว

    I ve seen too where they roll those barrels off trying get submarines back

  • @barrycarlisle4511
    @barrycarlisle4511 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anyone know what sound track this is?

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      IH_Meditation (7min47sec) But it's no longer in the TH-cam Llibrary.

  • @B0M0A0K
    @B0M0A0K 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How deep is this?

  • @TIO_1
    @TIO_1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What ship is that, doesn't look like any ive seen?

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It was a Peacetime Standard Type (D) Class Auxiliary Water Tanker: www.combinedfleet.com/Amakasu_t.htm

    • @TIO_1
      @TIO_1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@2011ACVVV fair enough.

  • @scotttilson8876
    @scotttilson8876 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks like there’s one deck gun.

  • @hatenit3137
    @hatenit3137 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is this a ww2 death ship?

  • @Dog.soldier1950
    @Dog.soldier1950 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tanker in this case means water tanker

  • @user-mr6xj6lb6e
    @user-mr6xj6lb6e 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    depth?

    • @ReformedSooner24
      @ReformedSooner24 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Сергей Задорожный
      People are saying that the lack of fish means it is probably around 1000 meters deep.

  • @BronxBastard730
    @BronxBastard730 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    All that damage will buff right out , no problem

  • @PimpMyReel
    @PimpMyReel 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Sunk off Salamaua Papua New Guinea in 1942. The first ship sunk by US Arial Torpedoes. I have dived this area but not so deep. I guess this wreck lies in 500m of water or more

  • @garethevans7892
    @garethevans7892 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Is that the IJN Shinano

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It;s the Amakasu Maru 1

  • @naui_diver9290
    @naui_diver9290 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Depth?

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Almost 1000 m.

  • @granskare
    @granskare 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I am pleased that you did not enter the vessel. There would have been Japanese sailors.

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      NOAA is always respectful when investigating and mapping wrecks.
      Their policy is: don't touch, destroy or take anything.

    • @Kpoole35
      @Kpoole35 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You wouldn’t see any sailors in there, the human body completely dissolves in sea water after 3 years.

    • @craftpaint1644
      @craftpaint1644 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Kpoole35 Didn't Jacque Cousteau enter ships off Rabaul and film a compartment of bones and skulls? He called it "a vision of hell."

  • @ModifiedRobloxSoccer
    @ModifiedRobloxSoccer 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Whasnt that the one in google maps

  • @koroba01
    @koroba01 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    The dash is the kanji character for the number one.

  • @ishmaelsykes9739
    @ishmaelsykes9739 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anyone knows what type of ship is supposed to be

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  ปีที่แล้ว

      A water carrier.
      AMAKASU MARU NO. 1. , launched in August 1939, was a 1,913-
      ton, 271-foot long, 40-foot beam, Type D merchant vessel, the first of her class.

  • @taraswertelecki3786
    @taraswertelecki3786 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This wreck was clearly heavily damaged during the sinking, but I'm amazed that it's not covered in rusticles and the fact the name is still legible on the stern of the ship. It appears to me the ship is beginning to collapse because of the ravages of corrosion.

    • @stephenhoward6829
      @stephenhoward6829 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Probably due to the metals used (Steel vs Iron) and the layers of lead-based paint is why you aren't seeing "Rusticles". Another reason might be very different microorganisms in the different locations, colder Atlantic waters Vs. warmer Pacific waters.

    • @jrt818
      @jrt818 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stephenhoward6829 the explanation I heard was that depth makes the difference. Upper layers of the ocean have more bacteria in competition with each other and rusticle bacteria have an open field at the lower depths.

  • @kangchaikang7964
    @kangchaikang7964 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Chinese and japanese word some are same

  • @kyleglenn2434
    @kyleglenn2434 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I am going to take a wild guess. I believe what we are seeing is a fleet oiler. I am basing this on the shortage of large caliber guns and the lack of deck armour. Narration would have been nice. Does anyone know the ship's name yet?

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The Amakasu Maru 1. A water tanker from port Yokohama.

    • @jefftheriault7260
      @jefftheriault7260 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tender, water carrier. Small potatoes compared to a fleet oiler.

  • @PerryBobKelly
    @PerryBobKelly 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is all that white sand covering it? Is it in shallow water? Also odd there isn’t much marine growth all over it

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's sediment. Sand and organic particles from plants, animals and fish that sink to the depth.

  • @XqeDiosxqe
    @XqeDiosxqe 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    We need a few of this underwater drones around the vicinity of the great Titanic......

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      There was an expedition August 2019. The deck house collapsed and the captain's bathtub is no longer visible. I saw it on TV not long ago, but I can't find that docu. Here a short clip: www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-49420935

    • @anniesnowy
      @anniesnowy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@2011ACVVV thanks a lot for sharing

  • @anthonyjohnramsey
    @anthonyjohnramsey 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    its yokohama

  • @xres1329
    @xres1329 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How deep this was at?

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Almost 1000 m

    • @xres1329
      @xres1329 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@2011ACVVV Now-Tha`s deep!

  • @snowindafunboots4369
    @snowindafunboots4369 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    10:44 what fish is that???

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Anglerfish (Lophioidei) aka Goosefish

  • @johnherder1383
    @johnherder1383 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Disappointed, there was no narration. It could have been interesting.

    • @johnemerson1363
      @johnemerson1363 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Blargenfladibblenohip ! Funny, they said Triton sank her off of Wake.

  • @shaw9881
    @shaw9881 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hey NOAA, how about perfecting your forecasts before looking for sunken ships.

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm not NOAA 🤣

  • @michaelbottai9983
    @michaelbottai9983 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Looks like a highly detailed model and the fish don't swim in ant of the motion shots....Hmmmmm?

    • @johnferguson7235
      @johnferguson7235 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The fish are typically stunned by the lights on the ROV.

    • @AMylander
      @AMylander 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Howie Felterbush And the moon landing was faked! 😂😂😂

    • @AMylander
      @AMylander 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Howie Felterbush And the moon landing was faked! 😂😂😂

  • @jerrymccrae7202
    @jerrymccrae7202 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    It dosent look like akagi or kaga.

    • @codyking4848
      @codyking4848 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      No shit. Did you even read the video description

  • @scotttilson8876
    @scotttilson8876 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Obviously not a warship. Probably a transport of some kind.

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a water tanker.

  • @delboytrotter8806
    @delboytrotter8806 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kaaboom.......bye.....

  • @leica3c
    @leica3c 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    dai-ihi-amakasu-maru-yokohama SHIPsNAME

    • @thepatriot8514
      @thepatriot8514 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      平方士敏 greetings from America to Japan.

  • @ashthefisherman8965
    @ashthefisherman8965 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not much marine life?

  • @kelliebrooks9094
    @kelliebrooks9094 ปีที่แล้ว

    Torpedo in za vater...most of the battle ship was snaked by those dreaded submarine....i have watched a lot of history show....an blah blah they always say she took a torpedo....almost 100 percent of the time

  • @OFCbigduke613
    @OFCbigduke613 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    WTF. HOW DEEP IS IT????

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      They didn't say. But it was deep.

    • @user-jy8en3xs8i
      @user-jy8en3xs8i 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nearly 1000 meters deep.

  • @patriciahaley3367
    @patriciahaley3367 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

  • @user-nj8ig6ek1n
    @user-nj8ig6ek1n 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    6:19 まあ一第 ?

    • @user-nj8ig6ek1n
      @user-nj8ig6ek1n 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      ありがとう、私はそれを知りませんでした。日本語は面白い。

  • @Lockbar
    @Lockbar 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    10:42 Fish says: "OK everybody, screw off! I'm the boss here now!!".

  • @jeffwalther3935
    @jeffwalther3935 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I was charmed by a first impression of the benign nature of freshwater tanker delivering the precious and vital, life-giving fluid to desert islands everywhere in the seawater world of the Pacific ONLY, no guns; absolutely orientally even, poetically wonderful to see here. Without its purpose to aid, abet and fuel fascist indiscriminate murdering savage barbarians in their historically unprecedented national mistake of all time, the charm is possible, and nice to see and think about here - what it could have been without the crazy ethnocentric fascism part of it all.

    • @jeffwalther3935
      @jeffwalther3935 ปีที่แล้ว

      @Rusty Nail 120741? USN? haha?, . . . NEVER again. Infamous.

  • @larryesmith5060
    @larryesmith5060 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    How Do They Know It's Japanese ?

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Maybe by reading the text on the bow?? I don't think you've watch this video.

  • @glennbonnell4241
    @glennbonnell4241 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    great video and pics.... music blows.....

  • @craftpaint1644
    @craftpaint1644 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Let's have a moment of silence for the poor low ranks that had to clean those decks, polish it's brass, and scrub the toilets 😐

  • @user-zj2zw1tg1x
    @user-zj2zw1tg1x 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    第一あます丸?

  • @richardcranium5839
    @richardcranium5839 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    think about this- using an rov to get a picture of an rov getting the picture!!!! an oxymoron???

    • @2011ACVVV
      @2011ACVVV  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      richard cranium In fact the one filming the ROV is an ROV but it's also a weight. It's hanging on the main cable and the vessel drags it. The ROV on the sea floor is connected with the ROV above him but can operate on it's own without the influence from the surface waves. oceanexplorer.noaa.gov/technology/subs/seirios/seirios.html

  • @zj37
    @zj37 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    第一?