Origins: Evolution, The Grand Experiment (Part 1)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 26

  • @ocdplaylistmaker7032
    @ocdplaylistmaker7032 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    0:00 to 9:05: Carl Werner Interview
    9:06: Spontaneous Generation
    12:57: Scientist Interviews
    13:33: Werner Interview; transition into Bat Evolution at 14:23
    17:07: Werner Interview; transition into Fish Evolution at 17:42
    20:37: Werner Interview; transition into Seal Evolution at 21:13
    22:15: Werner Interview; transition into dinosaur evolution at 23:42
    25:49: Dinosaur Fossil Diagram
    26:05: Werner Interview

  • @jamesginty5688
    @jamesginty5688 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Zuniceratops, Archaeoceratops, Auroraceratops, Yinlong, Chaoyangsaurus, Psittacosaurus and Liaoceratops 25:15
    Xiongguanlong, Yutyrannus, Juratyrant, Guanlong, Dilong, Timurlengia and Eotyrannus 24:26

    • @eddyvos2628
      @eddyvos2628 ปีที่แล้ว

      What is your point ?

  • @canadiankewldude
    @canadiankewldude 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    pp

  • @jamesginty6684
    @jamesginty6684 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    since this is not peer review it should not be taken seriously, it is very edited interview to misrepresent the palaeotonlogists and baseless claims about transitional fossils.
    Zuniceratops, Archaeoceratops, Mosaiceratops, Auroraceratops, Yinlong, Chaoyangsaurus, Psittacosaurus and Liaoceratops 25:15
    Xiongguanlong, Suskityrannus, Proceratosaurus, Yutyrannus, Juratyrant, Moros intrepidus, Guanlong, Dilong, Timurlengia and Eotyrannus 24:26
    all of these transitional forms match the prediction of what early ceratopsians and tyrannosauroids

    • @kingconstantinusthesadisti133
      @kingconstantinusthesadisti133 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      James, everything is match if we are delusional.

    • @FrankCostanza-u4b
      @FrankCostanza-u4b 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tell yourself whatever you want.

    • @johnroemeeks_apologetics
      @johnroemeeks_apologetics หลายเดือนก่อน

      Can you disprove anything he said?
      He has footage and gives transcripts of his interviews. None of those scientists are calling him out as a liar and saying they didn't say those things

    • @cqproton
      @cqproton 13 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@johnroemeeks_apologeticsthey just did in their comment by commenting on fossils we found that relate to the species.

  • @jamesginty6684
    @jamesginty6684 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Zuniceratops, Archaeoceratops, Mosaiceratops, Auroraceratops, Yinlong, Chaoyangsaurus, Psittacosaurus and Liaoceratops 25:15
    Xiongguanlong, Suskityrannus, Proceratosaurus, Yutyrannus, Juratyrant, Moros intrepidus, Guanlong, Dilong, Timurlengia and Eotyrannus 24:26
    all of these transitional forms match the prediction of what early ceratopsians and tyrannosauroids.

    • @albertsmith6717
      @albertsmith6717 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The supposedly whale evolution idea is the holy grail of evolution idea. Besides missing all the millions of transitional fossils between pakicetus, ambulocetus, and rodhocetus to whales. The two men that supposedly found ambulocetus and rodhocetus admits the critical defining bones that would determine a supposed lineage of ambulocetus and rodhocetus ❤to the whale are missing. Do you understand, missing, not there, do not exist. So, at best they are speculating and guessing about the fossils and lying to mislead the other gullible evolutionists.
      This is another video of truthful information devastating to the evolution idea. As you see, all the secular biologists admit that absolutely no evolution idea evidence exists. So, why is the evolution idea still taught to school students?