ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ม.ค. 2025
- Really understanding the technical indicators you use will mean you can develop more robust, profitable trading systems. This video shows how to put yourself to the test to see if you do! Are you up for the challenge?
Brought to you by Darwinex: UK FCA Regulated Broker, Asset Manager & Trader Exchange where Traders can legally attract Investor Capital and charge Performance Fees:
www.darwinex.c...
Link to MT5 Random Navigation Script used in this episode (MQL5):
github.com/dar...
#TechnicalIndicators, #AlgorithmicTrading, #TradingIndicators, #SystematicTrading, #Stochastic, #BestIndicators
Risk disclosure:
www.darwinex.c...
I just learned more about reading indicators in twelve minutes than in the last two years. Amazing, and thank you!
Glad it was helpful!
What should be a good win rate on a indicator?
Wow. I'm so happy it had such an impact on you!
nice work.. seriously Martin, so far I've been through all of your playlists on optimization, indicators and algo for living.
Also seen a lot of stuff from another channels.
So far, your videos are the best, hands down. In fact, I recommend it to all of my collegues who are interested in algo-trading
Keep up a good work! I know, it's doesn't have as much recognition as it should, but know man you are appreciated
This....this video... Love it, makes me immerse myself in the indicator, something I never thought about doing. Excellent stuff sir!!!!
Absolutely insane amount of value. Thank you Martyn
Thank you, Martyn, for these contents.
Finally the video! Im upvoting without seeung it because I kno its gonna be packed & AWESOME!
Thanks for this really great feedback and vote of confidence :) I hope it lived up to expectations
Why is this content free? It's really valuable information.
Another great comment! :) Thank you Pavel
Great video! I've watched many videos from you and I really like the way you explain things and pay attention to details. Just wanted to mention the possibility of a hidden divergence here. While you were drawing the price action in the second example (timestamp 10:17 min) you said that there would probably be a bigger pullback than the first. The alternative that came to my mind at that moment was a hidden bullish divergence, which means the oscillator is making a lower low while price is actually making a higher low during an uptrend. I'm sure you know about this concept. That the oscillator traveled into overbought territory afterwards also makes perfect sense when we assume a hidden divergence. Just wanted to suggest that you could keep both alternatives in mind: 1) a bigger pullback or 2) a smaller pullback with hidden divergence. But I understand that a hidden divergence would probably have gone beyond the scope of this video.
the best video about the sence of an indicators. thanks👍
This is fantastic advice, a pleasure to watch. Right will try and do the same before I consider coding for it.
Very helpful, indeed. Quite often the hints to try to understand an indicator are "have a look at the code!" Unfortunately, that is not always possible and I'm not that good at interpreting code and some programmers don't code in a friendly way, so this often ends in frustration. Your way is a completely different take and makes sense intuitively. I'll certainly give it a shot.
Yes, I find that many coders tend to do that. They think it makes them look more clever :) Personally I prefer well commented understandable code :)
Amazing exercise! Congrats and thank you so much!
Very interesting explantion, and very good example! Thak you a lot. Also thank you because you speak very clear (language), and in relax mode. This is for not English people that allows us to better understand your explanations
Thanks José
amazing stuff, l am part of the NNFX community, we use indicators a lot but your method is really interesting.
I had never though about indicators in this way but I think it is definitely good exercise.
Let me know how you get on....
@@TradeLikeAMachine (15-02-2021). Hi Martyn I have been doing this exercise with the RSI, and I am finding it quite difficult, specially when the RSI comes from overbought or oversold leves. I need to do train more.
I think crossing the lines is less more important or maybe completley unimportant, how long the lines remain in some specific area of oscillators scale and the momentum of reaching that levels is the key.
Just a thought, if you are able to foresee the price action just by looking at the indicator then it would mean that indicator would not be an independent variable and you are better off simply using price action rather than that indicator. For variable selection, the variables should be mutually independent in order to have the best predicting capabilities. Correct me if I am wrong, this exercise goes against it, right?
Indeed very useful. thank you again
Glad it was of value. My pleasure
Will be using this exercise, Thank you for all the content 💯
Let me know how you get on
So it felt weird I like it though , doing things differently. What I usually do is eyeball an indicator if I like how it enters trends and it fits the role of my trigger I will automate it visually with 3 other indicators and see how all 4 react to price , my decision will be qualitative but i’ll make sure to back it up by testing after
How bizarre - I seem to better understand the Stohastic Oscillater so much better! Very well explained. Loved the 'test'. Thanks.
This is Epic. How do you come up with great ideas like this?
Thanks Harry. A lot of ideas come from other people. So if you are struggling with anything, ask and I'll consider doing an episode on the subject.
@@TradeLikeAMachine Alright Sir
Wow that was 👏 Amazing.