UV light kills viruses. Why isn't it everywhere?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 4 ก.พ. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 1.1K

  • @sebastienwatling349
    @sebastienwatling349 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2643

    Another thing to be considered is that UV is EXTREMELY damaging to some materials such as plastics. there would be unexpected costs on paints , computers, appliances, Anything with plastic on it.

    • @seanplace8192
      @seanplace8192 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +334

      Exactly. UV doesn't just break down DNA of microbes, it also breaks down other chemical bonds, including those in plastics and other synthetic materials. This is why you may see some plastics begin to "Yellow" after being left outside for so long.

    • @SweetHyunho
      @SweetHyunho 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +98

      Yay, more microplastics!

    • @SilentStormParadox
      @SilentStormParadox 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +34

      The free market will pivot with the proper solution when the time comes like it always has. Spread the word.

    • @MildMisanthropeMaybeMassive
      @MildMisanthropeMaybeMassive 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +57

      Also pigments and anything printed as anyone who left photos, books, papers facing a bright window for years know.

    • @michaeladkins6
      @michaeladkins6 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +75

      @@SilentStormParadox Oh good. Just trust free market Capitalism.

  • @krishp1104
    @krishp1104 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3020

    My biggest fear getting a Far UV light bulb would be that manufacturers cut costs and ship defected UV lights that are harmful

    • @jayandremcmurtry7331
      @jayandremcmurtry7331 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +328

      which they totally would 😭

    • @FriskyDingo329
      @FriskyDingo329 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +60

      From Chima?

    • @youtube7076
      @youtube7076 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      so is 5g but who cares....

    • @xryphon
      @xryphon 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +115

      @@FriskyDingo329 Probably from the US or somewhere else, quality control is pretty difficult and costly

    • @SilentStormParadox
      @SilentStormParadox 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +72

      Then they'll come up with a UV detector that will tell you what a device is giving off. Like a carbon monoxide detector.

  • @israrisrar3800
    @israrisrar3800 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3899

    "why isn't it everywhere?" Should be a docu series

    • @CapnCody1622
      @CapnCody1622 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +196

      I’m sure 90% of the time, the answer is cost and greed.

    • @adrianblake8876
      @adrianblake8876 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      And in this case, lying to the audience. The video literally said "Far-UV doesn't cause cancer", which is outright false. UV-C is the most harmful of the UV lights...

    • @Y2Kvids
      @Y2Kvids 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +35

      Don't give them ideas .. for free

    • @tiffanysandmeier4753
      @tiffanysandmeier4753 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +38

      Cost and greed go hand in hand, but even without greed, the cost of good UV lights is still very expensive. And isn't necessarily greed but cost effectiveness.
      They are expensive to produce and don't necessarily last that long. I am saying this as someone with just the experience of buying UVB bulbs for a pet reptile. The florescent UV bulb has to be replaced around every 6 months even if it is still producing light because the bulb breaks down in a way and produces less UV light. And testing that UV is being produced isn't practical. It isn't something that we can see, so it is better for the animal to switch periodically than to wait for it to burn out. And they are much more expensive than regular florescent bulbs.

    • @CapnCody1622
      @CapnCody1622 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      @@tiffanysandmeier4753 Then that proves that it’s a greed thing. UV lights are clearly beneficial. In your context, sure, it is expensive but you do it because you’re not greedy for the wellbeing of your pet. The government needs to think the same way about their citizens. Not everything needs to be monetarily profitable if it improves the wellbeing of humans.

  • @jimaaman
    @jimaaman 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1017

    "low wavelength" is a confusing way to say "short wavelength". It would seem less confusing to say "short" since the term "low frequency" is associated with long wavelengths (not short wavelengths like UV-C)

    • @reynamainz
      @reynamainz 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +95

      glad someone else noticed this too. even the illustrations of the waves are inaccurate. and to think that UV-C waves are closer to x-rays in the spectrum. this is just plain confusing for the average viewer.

    • @giovannirafael5351
      @giovannirafael5351 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +69

      It's also super confusing, because short wavelength means higher energy and should be even more dangerous.

    • @ipikluninja91
      @ipikluninja91 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Istg I thought the same. I was so confused when she said "low" wavelength. I understood that as long wavelength at first because I usually associate long wavelength = low frequency = red side of the spectrum. Then after I thought a bit realized she meant "short" wavelength.

    • @user82938
      @user82938 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

      She seems like she did one day of learning before making this video.

    • @DANGJOS
      @DANGJOS 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      ​@@reynamainz How are they closer to X-rays?

  • @88GODZORA88
    @88GODZORA88 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2390

    Vox unfortunately missed a few very important points to UV. HVAC Enginner here. For the last 100 years UV lights have largely been mercury lamps which have their own health risks. LED technology is getting there, but it hasn't got to the point of commercial usage. I am also surprised how much they glossed over how HVAC systems for non-residential often use UV for coil cleaning and you can add lights more to clean the air. I guess they simply don't understand you can add this to the airstream of 100% OA system and provide relatively clean air for building occupants. Also, you STILL need filtration and standard is to go with at least a MERV-13 filter as a final filter before entering most spaces. This is a 7min video but the fact they didn't talk more than a few words in this aspect of air treatment is mind boggling.

    • @Nicolas-v1z4i
      @Nicolas-v1z4i 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +194

      good but this isn't a HVAC enginer class its a vox video

    • @krishp1104
      @krishp1104 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +103

      yeah they mentioned it at the end for a minute because this is a video about UV not HVAC. Though I do think they could've easily added a little bit more about it

    • @SamSB250
      @SamSB250 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

      you have a point. i do think that what these type of video does do is make you wanna know more about it. look at these types of video as a " Kick starter " the spark that lights up ur Curiosity.

    • @ttoleafoa70
      @ttoleafoa70 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +47

      What's a few words to you is a lot of info intake for us who are not familiar with this field

    • @sixclones6672
      @sixclones6672 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      Regarding the LED technology, there is a very good video by Veritasium on this topic published around a week ago

  • @kodakomp
    @kodakomp 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +319

    One of the biggest uses for UV light is in water/wastewater treatment. Was not mentioned at all. Helps with lowering the level of chlorine that is needed on water supplies drastically as you don't need as much to have a chlorine residual. Also the UV bulbs are secured in a vessel where it is not harmful to humans.

    • @tabby73
      @tabby73 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

      I was also waiting for this to be mentioned. We used to have a water filter/purifier that used UV light to make water safe to drink.

    • @sethsmith6042
      @sethsmith6042 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@tabby73 Those are perfect for backpacking, so much better than drinking iodine!

    • @GungaLaGunga
      @GungaLaGunga 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      which makes me wonder why we don't use UV light to keep swimming pool water sterilized instead of massive amount of chlorine and muriatic acid.

    • @jsaunders2152
      @jsaunders2152 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I was waiting for them to say that too but I guess the focus of the video was on open spaces where people live/work and not on what we consume.

    • @jwonz2054
      @jwonz2054 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It just shows the level of superficial analysis that Vox performs. Keep this in mind when they do more contentious topics.@@jsaunders2152

  • @thermitebanana
    @thermitebanana 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +401

    "Low wavelength" is the weirdest expression, and I don't think I've heard it before.
    Short wavelength - yes
    Low frequency (which means LONG wavelength) also yes
    Low wavelength - never

    • @yevrahhipstar3902
      @yevrahhipstar3902 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Peak to trough?

    • @evonne315
      @evonne315 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      It's just a little depressed.

    • @aut0tech
      @aut0tech 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      may be a new american way using words...lol

    • @hbrpaulo
      @hbrpaulo 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It means Low wavelength frequency, perhaps... I don't know

    • @MagicRoadrunner
      @MagicRoadrunner 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@hbrpaulo The formula used to describe the relation of wavelength and velocity is "wavelength = velocity devided by frequency" (in light waves, velocity will be the speed of light). Wavelength refers to the length of one period, Frequency refers to the amount of periods that pass in a certain time. The smaller a period is (short wavelength) the more periods fit in a second (high frequency), as you can also see in the formula. Small ("low") wavelength thus means high frequency, high frequency means high energy. "Low" sounds like "less intense", which makes no sense when talking about wavelengths.

  • @Max_Ivanov_Pro
    @Max_Ivanov_Pro 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +627

    I never realized how versatile and effective UV light can be for disinfection. It's amazing how many different applications it has!

    • @notmewooshme9916
      @notmewooshme9916 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I will make an obvious statement on this checkmark account and gain potential subscribers 🤓🤓

    • @HariSupriono
      @HariSupriono 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +36

      Oh dear it's an Ethereum scammer. I can't remember the last time I saw one of these back when I simply watched TH-cam without commenting

    • @Nathan_LJ
      @Nathan_LJ 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      UV is used to treat water all the time@@HariSupriono

    • @bluecat5669
      @bluecat5669 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      This guy bought a 1 million sub channel

    • @dylanbystedt
      @dylanbystedt 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Well, this video leaves a lot of info out... like bulb age, lumens, time, physical dirt, etc... there are many things to account for in UV disinfection. If it was simply better it would be everywhere.

  • @wllmsp9338
    @wllmsp9338 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +236

    I have a UV sterilization "box" for my CPAP equipment. One unmentioned problem is how BAD the UV sterilization process makes the tubing and other pieces smell. As it radiates microscopic stuff it causes the release of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). This odor has been described as a sulfuric smell similar to rotten eggs, garlic, or burning hair. It's so nasty that I've reverted to cleaning with baking soda and non-scented dishwashing soap. So much for convenience.

    • @SarahEZiegler
      @SarahEZiegler 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      Interesting, as someone sensitive to VOCs but also covid cautious, I had been excited by far UV but not aware of this, thanks for sharing, this was valuable information.

    • @reid.manares
      @reid.manares 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      That's ozone.

    • @ArawnOfAnnwn
      @ArawnOfAnnwn 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      @@SarahEZiegler UV causes reactions in more than just DNA. It also degrades anything made of plastic, among others.

    • @SarahEZiegler
      @SarahEZiegler 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@ArawnOfAnnwn Yes, that is correct, I read quite a bit about it after watching this video and also read that. I still do think it may be a promising way to reduce the risks associated with exposure to airborne pathogens though, definitely needs to be done very cautiously though.

    • @Species-lj8wh
      @Species-lj8wh 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The same here. Tried it, and a month later got rid of it.

  • @willemvandebeek
    @willemvandebeek 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +451

    The problem with UV light killing those bad viruses is, that 99.999% of the good microbes out there are killed as well...
    Living in a too sterile environment is in the long term not healthy either.

    • @MauritsWilke
      @MauritsWilke 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Why not?

    • @triiidot
      @triiidot 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +110

      ​@@MauritsWilke imagine if you stop using your legs your muscles will "forget" how to work, its like that with your immune system because your body creates its own atycorps

    • @nicholasgreen8703
      @nicholasgreen8703 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +58

      ​@@MauritsWilkeyour immune system is like a muscle. The more you responsibly work it, the stronger it gets. Without proper stimulation it gets lazy

    • @willemvandebeek
      @willemvandebeek 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +66

      @@MauritsWilke if the immune system doesn't get in touch with any microbes because of the clean sterile environment, it will start attacking benevolent substances, like peanuts, dog hair, latex, etc., and now an allergy has begun to develop.

    • @gypsyvegan
      @gypsyvegan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      The immune system is nothing like a muscle - it is more akin to a clutch on a manual transmission vehicle. Every time you use it, you use a little of it UP. @kurzgesagt has an excellent explainer on this. Akiko Iwasaki does an excellent job of making immunology approachable, she has several videos here on YT.

  • @Xanderviceory
    @Xanderviceory 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +113

    I use UV bulbs to eradicate mold in housing areas, works like a charm, just can't forget protective gear

    • @Y2Kvids
      @Y2Kvids 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Just damages paint and plastics

    • @FlyinDogRecords
      @FlyinDogRecords 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Can you expand on this please. I heard mold had to be cut off in the area. If not it can spread. Have you been successful at using the bulb in porus material?

    • @philipk89
      @philipk89 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Mold means not enough ventilation. Get the warm humid air out and cool dry air in. Preferably using a HRV system (heat recovery ventilation). Haven’t had any mold here since it was installed a few years ago!

    • @FlyinDogRecords
      @FlyinDogRecords 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@philipk89 Thank you so much. I will look into it. I had it sent to the lab and it came back non toxicity c but I'm going to get rid of it and look into the recovery system.

    • @Rudenbehr
      @Rudenbehr 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      @@philipk89some places like bathrooms are just naturally awful for mold

  • @Tindog81476
    @Tindog81476 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +37

    Sometime interesting is during the pandemic we were manufacturing some LED UV lights for the military, and a strange thing happened we found when we shined a UV light on oil it lost its stickiness and fell to the ground. It was super odd. We were all just like "Did you know UV light did that?" Not sure an application for that but it was an interesting thing that we didn't know UV did. As soon as you removed the light the oil returned to being sticky. Kinda weird to see, I'm sure there is probably an application here, but we were just trying to disinfect surfaces.

    • @iknowsolittle
      @iknowsolittle 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

      dude. this is a super interesting comment. could you expand on this or find some other people talking about this? pretty please?

    • @grilledflatbread4692
      @grilledflatbread4692 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      sounds like it would help in cleaning

    • @Tindog81476
      @Tindog81476 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That was literally the first thing we thought of/did we stuck it in our CNC mills closed the doors and turned it on, and all the chips and oil on the walls fell down, unfortunately, due to light always traveling in a straight line it missed some spots, but still got it pretty clean, it looked almost new. We did have to be careful though since UV light is actually dangerous, but not bad for turning the lights on and off. The old oil when it fell looked like black water running down the sides of the machine, when the light turned off it resolidified again. So instead of the oil being on the top of the machine, it was now on the bottom of the machine. It was pretty cool we tried it on several machines.@@grilledflatbread4692

    • @franfriel2
      @franfriel2 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fascinating. Thanks for sharing.

  • @pabloesparza1990
    @pabloesparza1990 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +204

    So look at the date I post this. This is something I have already commented on. The best 2 places this could be utilized would be in your refrigerator and in your bath/shower, not the entire bathroom. If you set those 2 locations up with a timer, you would get clean food that would last longer in the fridge and a shower that wouldn't grow pink/black patches. The negative side would be that the materials used in those locations would probably deteriorate a tiny bit faster, meaning that corporations would be happy. That's the offset foe getting the benefits of the light. Since it would come with a timer, you could also just choose not to use it as often. Point made here on this date money will be made later.

    • @RyanFennec
      @RyanFennec 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      🤔

    • @rogerhargreaves2272
      @rogerhargreaves2272 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Correct, it can cause material decomposition.
      I use U.V.C. in the kitchen on a timer so no one is exposed to the radiation.

    • @IndigoIndustrial
      @IndigoIndustrial 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      I use a UV torch to treat the sealant (mastic) in my shower to stop mould growing.
      It works.

    • @ASelfAwareCoolRanchDorito
      @ASelfAwareCoolRanchDorito 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@IndigoIndustrial thats actually genius

    • @halgerson
      @halgerson 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      My first thought was installing them under the cabinets in the kitchen to disinfect work surfaces. Of course it wouldn't be enough to stop cross-contamination while cooking (e.g. using the same cutting board for poultry and vegetables without washing), but maybe to disinfect the counter so it is disinfectanted the next day.

  • @ebridgewater
    @ebridgewater 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +126

    Also keep in mind we don't want the general environment too clean. Our natural immune system is very important and needs to be trained.

    • @MedicinalBlood
      @MedicinalBlood 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +18

      That’s a myth. Old wives tale.

    • @madeline7272
      @madeline7272 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That’s what vaccines are for

    • @BenjaminGoose
      @BenjaminGoose 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Could you link to some information on that? I always thought it was true.@@MedicinalBlood

    • @HowVeryDelightful
      @HowVeryDelightful 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​Not an old wives tale. Having a diverse microbiome has a myriad of different health benefits - including for your immune system. The key is close contact with nature. Many studies have shown significantly lower prevalence of auto-immune diseases in rural children compared to urban.@@MedicinalBlood

    • @AkshayKumarX
      @AkshayKumarX 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

      ​@@MedicinalBloodisn't that the reason why so many kids develop ailments like nut allergies, etc because they didn't have a varied diet in their early childhood years?
      Natural inoculation towards diseases works the same way doesn't it?

  • @jessetorres8738
    @jessetorres8738 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +207

    In the video game Dying Light 2, 1 way to survive against the zombie infection is to be near UV lights. It doesn't cure the characters of the zombie virus, but it does slow down the infection spreading in their bodies at night.

    • @1337billybob
      @1337billybob 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +39

      Speculative fiction has always been a great way to introduce ideas. It’s a good metaphor to start a discussion.

    • @lobaandrade7172
      @lobaandrade7172 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +20

      This is why I clicked on this video. Glad someone else did too

    • @quetzalcat2839
      @quetzalcat2839 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      i love dying light

  • @Manuel-hd8qf
    @Manuel-hd8qf 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +33

    I got hired at a light source company during the pandemic and business was booming for them

  • @jtwrecks
    @jtwrecks 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +22

    I have a UV light device with a proximity sensor that turns off if a human or pet is close to it. It's amazing

    • @soup331emd5
      @soup331emd5 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      How much did it cost?

  • @HowVeryDelightful
    @HowVeryDelightful 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +146

    Having UV as a solution for cleanliness is misguided because it kills all microbes indiscriminately - microbes that are beneficial to humans and their environment. In some settings where cleanliness is of the utmost importance UV can be a good solution - such as hospital and laboratory settings where it is already in use.

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Only where the light touches though, which won't be everywhere. Even if not completely eliminated, just reducing the density of damaging pathogens in the environment goes a long way in suppressing the subsequent illness.

    • @watema3381
      @watema3381 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @JDns-we4fw And soap.

    • @AcidRP
      @AcidRP 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

      It's not for everywhere though, it's for hospitals, events, malls, ect...

    • @Metqa
      @Metqa 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @JDns-we4fw So does fire...

    • @gunsite45
      @gunsite45 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Very good comment. There's no need for this stuff at home. You aren't contacting the flu in your home bathroom or kitchen. Places where this is useful as you said, it's already there.

  • @trailerwookie
    @trailerwookie 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

    My friend built a rainwater collection and filtration system for a client. Part of the filtration and purification process involves UV light since the client uses the water for consumption.

  • @hanifarroisimukhlis5989
    @hanifarroisimukhlis5989 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +242

    Simple answer: it also hurts humans. Antiseptic don't really hurts (in small quantity).

    • @lazyman2451
      @lazyman2451 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’ll blind you when waking up in the middle of the night with that s$&@ on

    • @FelipeKana1
      @FelipeKana1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +15

      Also... it actually is everywhere. From the sun. That's why we should use sunblockers.

    • @adrianblake8876
      @adrianblake8876 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@FelipeKana1 Ironically UVC isn't everywhere, because our atmosphere is very effective at blocking it. Shorter wavelengths, unlike what the video seems to imply, are more harmful. Even shorter than UVC are X-rays, and gamma rays, the latter being radioactively harmful...

    • @gypsyvegan
      @gypsyvegan 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It depends on what part of the spectrum/what wavelength you're talking about. 222nm is only harmful if you're in immediate proximity to it, and still effective at killing viruses. The OSLUV Project is a good resource, as is Aaron Collins (aka The Mask Nerd) here on YT.

    • @ether4211
      @ether4211 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

      Antiseptics also hurt humans and are grossly overused - especially during COVID. We don't fully know how much damage they do at low doses but they certainly have an impact on your microbiome and some are known to depress the immune system or cause serious allergic reactions. Not to mention that repeated low dose usage promotes antibiotic resistance.

  • @mysisterisafoodie
    @mysisterisafoodie 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +28

    I work for a company that is working toward getting this FDA approved by the end of this year, we’re getting there!

    • @leahmcpherson7560
      @leahmcpherson7560 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Question: do the lamps generate a buzzing or humming? I'm susceptible to migraines but am still highly interested in a potential future purchase. Thank you for your time

    • @mysisterisafoodie
      @mysisterisafoodie 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@leahmcpherson7560 no, not at all, they entire device is in a contained capsule, with a mini glass view point (that isn’t really functional, more for the aesthetics of people seeing “UV light”). So it’s really quiet! But there is a cooling fan, which isn’t any louder than a laptop. The mercury lamp does deteriorate and need replacement after a year, so that will be a pretty costly consumable, but hey, I guess it’s just like lamps in your current lighting situation. Just a lot more expensive.

    • @isaiahcabino6431
      @isaiahcabino6431 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What’s the name of the company? :)

    • @genres381
      @genres381 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      how is it going

  • @mikerooney7600
    @mikerooney7600 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    They have Portable ones you can buy too. My Ultrablu literally doubles as a phone charger! Literal life saver.

    • @robertnathanson
      @robertnathanson 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I have one too. It’s the best thing ever and I just got one for the entire family! Thank you Michael Rooney!!!!! ❤😊

    • @HomesOnSocial
      @HomesOnSocial 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I have an UltraBlu for each member of my family as well. My wife and I actually use it all the time we preferred using it over hand sanitizer, which was drying out my hands to no end.

    • @mikerooney7600
      @mikerooney7600 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @HomesOnSocial all I want is a charged phone! The covid hocus pocus is a bonus 👌

    • @HomesOnSocial
      @HomesOnSocial 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@mikerooney7600 facts!

  • @malinullberg
    @malinullberg 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    UV IS widely used as disinfectant in drinking water treatment plants, since a few decades! Very good against bacteria and parasites, but less so viruses
    /Process engineer for water systems

  • @bennydreamly
    @bennydreamly 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +44

    What about the good bacteria on your skin? and in the environment? What would that do?

    • @joelmulder
      @joelmulder 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      UV kills them. It also damages the DNA in your skin with prolonged exposure just like sitting in the sun does, and will give you skin cancer.

    • @ThwipThwipBoom
      @ThwipThwipBoom 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +21

      It kills them as well. UV light is indiscriminate with the bacteria and viruses it kills. This is why UV lights aren't good for households and are best used in places like hospitals and labs.

    • @kirbykracklemusic
      @kirbykracklemusic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It kills them as well, but the moment you step outside again it comes rushing right back.

    • @kirbykracklemusic
      @kirbykracklemusic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@ThwipThwipBoomYes, UV-A and UV-B is best used in hospitals and labs. Far UV (222nm) cannot breach the outer layer of the skin or eye making it safe and extremely effective against both airborne and surface laying pathogens in the home and workplace.

    • @GP-qz6kk
      @GP-qz6kk 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@kirbykracklemusic
      That prevents damage to our DNA and cancer, but there's also good microbes outside of our body.

  • @jimmurphy6095
    @jimmurphy6095 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +64

    One benefit not mentioned is that this will also work on the so called "super bugs" that are resistant to current antibiotics. They can't build up a defense against this.

    • @Happy-xi9hl
      @Happy-xi9hl 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      They can...eventually some bacteria will come up with a mutation allowing it to survive UV, but it'll come at a huge cost.... nothing is impossible in the bacteria world....

    • @hanifarroisimukhlis5989
      @hanifarroisimukhlis5989 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Happy-xi9hl Ehhh... not really. Pretty much the only way to survive UV is melanin or cyst, both have huge tradeoff with infectivity.

    • @Selsato
      @Selsato 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

      "They can't build up a defense against this" is the funniest possible sentence to say in the context of superbugs lol

    • @Jake_5693
      @Jake_5693 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Nature finds a way

    • @RickJaeger
      @RickJaeger 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I would bet against nature finding a way, tbh. Getting blasted with large doses of high-energy radiation is one of those things that kills things universally, such as getting dropped into the Sun.

  • @DanielDogeanu
    @DanielDogeanu 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +10

    Placing UV light barriers inside HVAC and filters seems far more effective to me than placing it directly into the room. Kind of like water sterilizers work.

  • @007KrausBean
    @007KrausBean 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +50

    Great information. Sadly, here in America people seem to be of the "All or nothing" mindset which means I could see so many people latching on to UV as a fix for things and over doing it. This makes things worse and creates more problems. If only, the general public did more reading, research, and learning before going all in.

    • @gladitsnotme
      @gladitsnotme 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Yeah that's just an American thing, not a human problem at all. Only Americans overdo things.

    • @aiocafea
      @aiocafea 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@gladitsnotme while I don't like generalisations, I do feel like the over-abundance in The US can promote a sort of 'spend now, think later' way of solving issues, where cost-effectiveness and consequences in the long term are not very visible with immediate prices up until deployment

    • @doujinflip
      @doujinflip 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      Americans express it openly, but the absolutist mindset is common throughout humanity particularly with easily-terrorized traditionalists.

    • @adrianblake8876
      @adrianblake8876 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This video is by definition, misinformation. The reason UV is harmful is because of the shorter wavelength, so they suggest bombarding us with lamps that emit even shorter wavelengths. The reason UVA and UVB are more infamous is because they have a long enough wavelength to NOT be blocked by our atmosphere.
      To demonstrate, we're bombarded 24/7 by extremely long wavelengths for radio broadcast, and the public panics even though they're relatively harmless...

    • @kirbykracklemusic
      @kirbykracklemusic 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      An understandable concern, and with that the moment you turn it off or step outside everything starts growing back right away.

  • @stijneke2911
    @stijneke2911 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Could we maybe stick with scientists explaining the technology, and not salesmen trying to sell their product?

  • @buccizero
    @buccizero 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I set up my 1st aquarium back in 90.. it included a uv sterilizer.
    UV is unstoppable

  • @EinZweid
    @EinZweid 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    I'm a bit concerned about the neutrality of having a CEO on who literally sells the UV lights discussed in the video. Wouldn't the profits from the advertising of his own use counter any negative downsides of the use?

  • @steveswoodworking2504
    @steveswoodworking2504 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    How does this affect people with lupus who are sensitive to the sun and can get a rash in minutes? I spend a great deal of money and effort staying away from UV light.

    • @Madonnalitta1
      @Madonnalitta1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      So it's not for you.
      Move on.

    • @steveswoodworking2504
      @steveswoodworking2504 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@Madonnalitta1 Thanks for the kind words. If commercial businesses start putting these all over the place, it will affect me and others with lupus, and we may not even be aware they are being used. A lupus attack can start, which possibly can end up killing the kidneys. It's right in the title "Why isn't it everywhere", that is my concern.

    • @ockertoustesizem1234
      @ockertoustesizem1234 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      these lights are already used in hvac and water filtration systems. these lights aren't supposed to be used on human skin

  • @susanbailey36
    @susanbailey36 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In my mid twenties I had a uv treatment for out of control eczema on my hands it was a game changer . That was forty years ago. I still have eczema but I'm able to keep it under control with creams and good diet. Without this treatment I think I would have forty more years of misery and infection. I agree more study should be done.

  • @jakemoeller7850
    @jakemoeller7850 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    We had UV lights in the men's gym changing rooms. They were positioned on the walls near the ceiling, pointing up. This was in the early 60s.

  • @wombat.6652
    @wombat.6652 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The thing that worries me, the searches I do come up with a LOT of "buy our lamps" not a lot of scientist' studies.

  • @clkersting
    @clkersting 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

    Maybe it's been mentioned, UV light also damages various materials. It prematurely breaks down plastics, wood, etc.

  • @rubysresource
    @rubysresource 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This is why I have a set of Nukit Torch Far-UVC Lights as part of my mitigation toolkit, along with my Aranet4 and comfortable Trident valved P2 masks.
    Having multiple layers of protection and real time air quality measurements at my disposal gives me flexibility and lets me make informed decisions about how I want to manage risk in different circumstances.

  • @peterjones701
    @peterjones701 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    When I used to work at a hospital I remember seeing UV sanitizers being wheeled around.

  • @joshnizzle
    @joshnizzle 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    They need something like that in schools now. My kids are constantly sick anytime they go to school and get around other kids. But when they’re home long period of time they don’t get sick basically ever really.

    • @joshnizzle
      @joshnizzle 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @squibbelsmcjohnson I didn’t say anything about shielding them from everything and making them soft pansies. You’re reading too much into that.

    • @andrej2321
      @andrej2321 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Kids get dozen of colds a year. Deal with it or just don’t have kids.

  • @4RILDIGITAL
    @4RILDIGITAL 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I hadn't realized the potential of far-UV light as a disinfectant until now. The possible side effects, such as ozone production, are definitely a concern that should be further researched. This could indeed be an important additional tool in our health safety toolkit.

  • @roguenine9LU
    @roguenine9LU 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Changing fixtures that are commonly touched like door knobs and hand rails to materials that are naturally antimicrobial, especially copper and its alloys.

  • @erictaylor5462
    @erictaylor5462 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    There was a club owner who had a black lite on the dance floor. When that light burned out he replaced it, with a UV light meant for sanitation purposes only. UV-C.
    It liked just like the old light so he had no idea what he had done before the complaints started coming in.
    It was bad

    • @MrMonkeybat
      @MrMonkeybat 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How many people were affected? What were the worse injures?

    • @jmckendry84
      @jmckendry84 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Citation needed

    • @ockertoustesizem1234
      @ockertoustesizem1234 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@jmckendry84 this happens more often than you think

  • @khsimagesdotcom856
    @khsimagesdotcom856 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    That UV light (mentioned here: 4:36) that's conspicuously placed behind PJ Piper (CEO of UV Technologies) is the 'Far UV Technologies Krypton Guard Floor Lamp' offered on Amazon for $1,999.
    Kids, the term for the day is 'product placement'.

  • @michaelcarey
    @michaelcarey 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    Low wavelength? Light is measured by its frequency. Does low wavelength mean low amplitude, a weak UV light? IIRC all UV-C is bad for you. There have been quite a few situations where people have inadvertently exposed to UV-C germicidal lamps instead of UV "blacklights" and suffered severe skin and eye damage.

    • @hund4440
      @hund4440 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Low wavelength is obviously short wave length. The value of length is low.

    • @diamondportal77
      @diamondportal77 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No, the wave length would be high.
      Vox just got it backwards due to inexperience.

  • @LeoSpaceman69
    @LeoSpaceman69 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    This was super interesting, I did wonder why its not everywhere, forgot about the cancer risk.
    Here in Hong Kong for example we have UV-projecting disinfectant gadgets above lift buttons and door handles, as well as little machines on escalators that UV disinfect the handrails, hopefully more to come.

  • @charlieclarke3713
    @charlieclarke3713 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Thanks for this! Very informative!

  • @shawnpa
    @shawnpa 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Interesting info because its huge potential as a universal disinfectant. Good to know hospitals are trying this, and the limits from O³ concerns.

  • @mabonora
    @mabonora 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +24

    Why did you choose to show the spectrum graph that way? I get that the axis is showing wavelength instead of frequency, but the other way around is more common and especially more clear! Even infrared gets its name because is "below" red and UV (ultraviolet) because is beyond violet, don't they?

    • @jmckendry84
      @jmckendry84 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I disagree that they way you describe is more common. It doesn't seem unusual to me for the plot to show shorter wavelengths on the left and longer wavelengths on the right.

    • @mabonora
      @mabonora 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @jmckendry84 And how do you explain INFRAred and ULTRAviolet?

  • @graemepennell
    @graemepennell 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    So hold on, the first answer to your question tells you all you need to know, yet you still ask the question again for ... what? Hope of a different answer?

  • @tayloriginals999
    @tayloriginals999 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I wonder if it could be paired with better air movement and filtration. Put the lights inside the duct work where it won't expose people before improved filtration to filter out the ozone.

    • @FR-oz9px
      @FR-oz9px 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That’s what probably didn’t fit into this short video and wasn’t promoted by the company they’ve interviewed.
      If you ask scientists, that’s exactly what they’re saying.

  • @tonys.1946
    @tonys.1946 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I'm down for having this at my house, where I can turn it on when I'm at work

  • @Pou1gie1
    @Pou1gie1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I have a portable water purifier I got from REI in 2004 that uses UV light technology, and I used it is Papua New Guinea. I never got worms or any other ingestible pathogen ...so I guess it worked. Other ppl told me they had gotten stomach worms from drinking the water and eating the food.

  • @davidrennie8197
    @davidrennie8197 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    What I'd love for my home: solar-powered device pulling in air from outside, whacking it with UV then HEPA-grade filtering along the route to to pumping it at positive pressure through the house. Toilet output to be UV-irradiated on its way down south - maybe UV light in underside of seat to come on whrn the lid is down.

  • @nguyenlamanh2919
    @nguyenlamanh2919 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +13

    Why low UV is safer? I thought the lower the wavelength, the stronger it is. Shouldn’t low UV create more cancer?

    • @waamintion5653
      @waamintion5653 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Its still on the high end of the frequency range. Its just low enough to not cause immediate damage.

    • @RyanFrazee-xs4gl
      @RyanFrazee-xs4gl 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

      Yes, UV-C is more powerful and more penetrating than UV-A or B, the writers of this video got it backwards.

  • @YokoFuongAnh
    @YokoFuongAnh 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    I have a LarQ water bottle that has UV light and I love that I dont; have to worry about bacteria/viruses that can be in the water I drink 🤗

  • @blues03
    @blues03 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I watch resotoration channels that deal with yellowed plastics. It's nice to see the explanation behind the process.

  • @Susyyasmin
    @Susyyasmin 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Thank you for sharing this. Very insightful

  • @volpedo2000
    @volpedo2000 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interesting in certain applications and environments. I did find the tone condescending at times.

  • @tylerfortier2666
    @tylerfortier2666 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Dying Light 2 noises intensify

    • @ThwipThwipBoom
      @ThwipThwipBoom 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Stray noises intensify as well

  • @vivi_t3ch
    @vivi_t3ch 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    airports would be another great place to have these, help slow down or even stop diseases from spreading as fast.

    • @LazzieMazzie
      @LazzieMazzie 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      but until we create UV light that doesn't create humans to have cancer we won't be having UV lights everywhere we go

  • @UjjwalKumar_234
    @UjjwalKumar_234 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    "... even though they operate at a low wavelength ..." -- Vox 😂

  • @seandonohue6793
    @seandonohue6793 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    In UK hospitals during Covid we had multiple air circulators on each ward near the doors which drew air in at the bottom, passed it through a UV chamber and released the air at the top. These were running constantly, especially in isolation rooms where Covid patients were staying.

    • @cogoid
      @cogoid 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      In the USSR, short wavelength UV irraddiation was one of the most commonly prescribed procedures. Kindergarten children were getting their throats irradiated a couple of times a week as a prophylaxis during the Cold season. A couple of minutes of 40 W/m^2 broadband radiation from a quartz mercury lamp per session.
      I have no idea whether there were any serious studies of safety and efficacy. Medical textbooks focused on planning how many lamps would be needed for a given facility, just matter of factly assuming that the procedure was an established staple in the medical toolkit. This is almost never discussed in the West, and only now there appear high profile studies of similar techniques based on 222 nm light.

  • @theemersonstuff
    @theemersonstuff 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Doesn't light reflect on surfaces? So, weren't those kids shown in the beginning of the video still in danger of developing cancer later in life?!

  • @Awakening_Sunshine
    @Awakening_Sunshine 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a UV box for sanitizing my phone! I also sometimes use it to disinfect cloth masks before washing them

  • @BudzBunny422
    @BudzBunny422 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +14

    Restaurants and fast-food use them in the kitchen. You might even see a blue light in the dining room area at some places.

    • @Martin-dz7gy
      @Martin-dz7gy 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +19

      Those are insect traps. The light attracts the insects and there is glue paper near it to catch them. They are not meant to sterilize the air

  • @Karaon
    @Karaon 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    TO ANY DIY MAKERS HERE
    Keep in mind the UV-C creates ozone out of air thus it shouldn't be used in closed areas for long periods

  • @hayeonkim7838
    @hayeonkim7838 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Thanks for useful and informative video as always ❤❤❤

  • @Fomites
    @Fomites 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have been wondering for several years why this has not been implemented much more widely.

  • @CaffeineAndContempt
    @CaffeineAndContempt 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The ICU in my hospital has UV lights in the bathrooms that automatically switch on when no one is inside. Dunno how much good it does (good thing I'm watching this video!) but it's pretty cool

    • @FR-oz9px
      @FR-oz9px 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      That should be the standard tbh. Toilets were constructed without droplets and aerosols in mind. That’s dangerous in a hospital.

  • @rnrnrkrk994
    @rnrnrkrk994 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    South Korea has these UV lights everywhere. Hand dryer in restrooms, self-service cup "sanitizers" in food courts in malls, Subway stations' escalator handles, Hyundai car glove box, and so much more. South Korea is one of the most obsessed country with germs!

  • @dlwestphalen
    @dlwestphalen 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    You guys missed the chance to show the Sanuvox products used in commercial (shopping malls, hospitals) and residential applications. I have it installed in my home HVAC system.

  • @robertlivingston360
    @robertlivingston360 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Most hospitals and public buildings use a lot of stainless steel for commonly touched surfaces, but its not as effective as using copper. Copper just needs more polishing.

  • @DJH316007
    @DJH316007 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Why not just circulate the air through vents and do the UV cleaning in the vents?

  • @prism2451
    @prism2451 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    A dynamic uv projector can be a solution. A system that uses cameras to project light in only empty places in the room in real time.

  • @Jalex92
    @Jalex92 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I own uv c lights and I caution people BE CAREFUL! they don’t seem strong until the damage is done.

  • @mikpug
    @mikpug 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like the way she talks😄

  • @SmoggySandwich
    @SmoggySandwich 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Put them on airplanes and in airports. I get sick every single time I fly and it would slow any spread of a new disease from country to country.

    • @SweetGypsyMamma213
      @SweetGypsyMamma213 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes because the air before the flight takes off and during landing is at peak toxicity while onboard a plane.

    • @FR-oz9px
      @FR-oz9px 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It’s already used in airports, but not in airplanes. Airplanes have HEPA-filters, because they’re recycling air inside, but they’re rather small. Air quality levels are often bad around boarding, if you carry a CO2-sensor with you, it’s quite astonishing to watch.
      I highly recommend you to wear a well-fitting respirator. I’ll never fly again without wearing one. There’s always going to be sick people on planes and it’ll only get worse from now on.

  • @AceChampElite
    @AceChampElite 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I immediately got an ad for some UV light disinfectant product called ‘UVlizer’ lol

  • @layneburton9172
    @layneburton9172 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Can any microbiologists expand on the idea of viruses and bacteria mutating to become UV-resistant if the use of the techology expands, similar to the antibiotic crisis we're in today?

  • @zimbot_KWB
    @zimbot_KWB 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    But how much damage does it do to our "good" microbiome and virome?

  • @oblio
    @oblio 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    So, this sounds cool, but is this the equivalent of setting the forest on fire when you want to get rid of a few poison ivy plants? Is there anything beneficial in the air that we maybe don't want to wipe out?

  • @themarcusismael13
    @themarcusismael13 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Just like in the game dying light where every door to and inside a safe zone has UV light bars. I’ve always wondered what the real world application could be and it turns out it’s not far off.

  • @ErmiusJillian
    @ErmiusJillian 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +23

    fellas, it's better to take a bath of water than bathe something that literally says "Ultraviolet" light

    • @ThwipThwipBoom
      @ThwipThwipBoom 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      For now yeah, but the tech is evolving. Once it gets FDA approval you'll start seeing it much more often.

    • @minhducnguyen9276
      @minhducnguyen9276 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      My professor always says as long as the surface allows the use of soap and water, soap and water will always be the most cost effective means of disinfection.

  • @HygienistDentist
    @HygienistDentist 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’d love to have this in treatment rooms in between patients.

  • @bloop_official
    @bloop_official 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    Vox + Netflix explained + Johnny Harris + Cleo Abram is the best TV routine of all time, and the fact that all of these are related to Vox is mindblowing, the number of subscirbers of Vox are less than the video quality it creates.

    • @no_name4796
      @no_name4796 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Fun fact: fow news youtube channel has around the same subs then vox lol

  • @micahnguyen8857
    @micahnguyen8857 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The residential hvac industry has been using this tech since the 90’s.

  • @savagepro9060
    @savagepro9060 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +8

    1:21 That UV destruction is too slow. Let me boost it with some toasty nicotine. Yeah baby!

  • @mohamadsami7131
    @mohamadsami7131 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for sharing this information

  • @sn0tkore
    @sn0tkore 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +11

    This smacks of the whole ultra clean environment issues. Allergies and autoimmune conditions could be tied to growing up in an ultra clean environments. Healthy people that aren't old aren't dying from every day illnesses.
    Maybe this is worthwhile in hospitals and care homes, but this isnt reqired everywhere.

    • @reddragonflyxx657
      @reddragonflyxx657 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It's more complicated than that, and still being researched. The level of contamination in our current environments can be harmful too. Doing this in restaurants could easily turn out far more beneficial than harmful, and if we figure out which exposures are beneficial (which is useful regardless of UVGI catching on) it might not be necessary to get them through inhalation.
      We used to drink water contaminated by sewage. That's far worse for public health than our autoimmune disease issue. We haven't tested air treatment at that scale, but it could be a similarly clear net benefit.
      Excerpts from doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700688114
      > Measles and many respiratory diseases proved not to be protective against allergic disease, and, in many cases, even increased the risk
      > “The trouble is, as soon as you use the words ‘hygiene hypothesis,’ the word hygiene prejudges what the cause is,” says Bloomfield. To the public, “hygiene” is interpreted as personal cleanliness: washing hands, keeping food clean and fresh, sanitizing the home. However, because the hypothesis has been largely uncoupled from infections, the idea that we need to be less hygienic is wrong. Relaxing hygiene standards would not reverse the trend but only serve to increase the risks of infectious disease, says Bloomfield. The term “hygiene hypothesis” also fails to incorporate all of the other factors now linked to the increase in immunoregulatory diseases.
      > Early in life is the key: It is likely any intervention will need to be done by 3 or 4 years of age, by which time a child’s microbiome is established and the immune system has completed much of its training.

    • @billcox6791
      @billcox6791 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It could also be useful in other places where many people gather: classrooms, offices, stores, restaurants. You don’t know who they might be bringing whatever disease home to, and things like measles and covid are no joke even for healthy populations.
      But, I agree it’s not needed everywhere. At home, it would be both ineffective (more direct means of transmission are much more prevalent) and, as you mention, being too clean has its own issues (in addition to allergies, there are helpful microbes).
      Apply where appropriate, get vaccinated, wash your hands.

  • @Alabamaliberal
    @Alabamaliberal 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    "Why isn't it everywhere" is answered in the 4th minute of this video as they explain how it changes the chemical composition of the air with increased ozone particles... I'm sorry, but this is a world where we still haven't officially stated that cell phone radiation causes cancer, so I don't trust that we would understand the true health side effects of this until decades after it's been put everywhere. Slightly more radioactive air IS more cancerous than what we're currently breathing, and cancer risk is so much higher than someone dying of a hypothetical next pandemic. CoVid was the worst pandemic in ages, and it still only killed about as many Americans in a given year as cancer does EVERY year.

    • @_blank-_
      @_blank-_ 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Natural background radiation levels vary a lot, so it's a question of whether it's in the acceptable range.

  • @savagepro9060
    @savagepro9060 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    UV . . . Ultra Vox . . . the next branch of a powerful enLIGHTENING TH-cam channel

  • @skylark.kraken
    @skylark.kraken 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Far UV breadbox please

  • @MySNova
    @MySNova 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Good video vox.. good video.

  • @darkendkefka
    @darkendkefka 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    It would be interesting if yall did a deep dive into UV. I work in an industry with some lasers and a lot of UV light

  • @rsmith02
    @rsmith02 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I've seen them in HVAC systems which seems like a good use (assuming ozone is being controlled).

  • @TheJumpingBeanie
    @TheJumpingBeanie 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This was pretty enlightening

  • @acid4413
    @acid4413 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I have lupus so UV light is extremely bad for me and having it everywhere would probably mean death

    • @This_Is_Just_To_Say
      @This_Is_Just_To_Say 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How does UV light affect people with lupus differently? (Genuinely asking, have a family member with a chronic condition, so I do know that how people with chronic conditions are affected is frequently overlooked.)

  • @hko2006
    @hko2006 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Ya I remember seeing one in my classroom, I wondered how effective it was, thank you answering this for me

  • @maximilianmorse9697
    @maximilianmorse9697 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    It is everywhere, you never heard if the sun?

  • @dennispremoli7950
    @dennispremoli7950 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    One of the problems, as discussed in Veritasium's latest video on blue LED, is the lack of availability of a UV-rated LED, let alone UV-C

    • @martinweizenacker7129
      @martinweizenacker7129 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Mercury discharge lamps do exist. With the right glass type, they emit tons of UV-C.

  • @benmcreynolds8581
    @benmcreynolds8581 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I think it would be the best idea to utilize them in public schools and hospitals. They are the top areas where pathogens can really go wild if they are allowed to roam free. It really wouldn't hurt to give this a shot. It's "risks" are pretty tame and manageable compared to most things. They come with benefits. The thing that is probably important is trying to keep people level headed about this new stuff and it's probably not necessary for each household to think they need to invest in their own system.. It's probably better for mass gathering zones

    • @billcox6791
      @billcox6791 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Exactly what I was thinking. It doesn’t make much sense in a home setting where more direct transmission is the issue. But, in a classroom or office? Those measles statistics are fantastic for such a simple mitigation!