I think I got good solution that doesn't use any of f(number). Putting x, - x and 2x in pairs instead of x and y you have a great system of equations. And the result is the same: 1 + x and 1 - x
Interesting. First he proves that f(x) cannot be zero for any x (6:18), then he goes on to claim this 7:34 😇 As far as i can see (frankly speaking i couldn't find any other way to solve the problem), i have to claim that f(x)=f(-x). That leads me to y=-x, hence f(x)=+-sqrt(1-x^2) where f: ]-1,1[ --> ]0,+-1].
From [f(x)][1-f(0)]=0 --> f(0)=1 But not f(x)=0 and it is explained why it is so. I agree that f(x)=0 does not aplly for any x. Now consider x≠0 and y=0: [f(x≠0)]f(0)=f(x≠0) --> [(f(x≠0)][1-f(0)]=0 f(0)=1 or f(x≠0)=0 Therefore f(x)=1 for x=0 =0 otherwise Kindly give your comment sir.
@@sanidhyavijay2281: Two solutions you get: f(x)=1+x and f(x)=1-x both give f(0)=1. If x=y=0 LHS=[f(0)][f(0)]=1(1)=1 and RHS=f(0)=1. The same result will be obtained with f(x)=1 for x=0 =0 otherwise as LHS=[f(0)][f(0)]=1(1)=1 and RHS=f(0)=1
World 🌎 International Math Olympiad 2019 - Algebra - Find f(x)?! Boost Your Confidence 😆
th-cam.com/video/M8MMf8pm0FM/w-d-xo.html
I think I got good solution that doesn't use any of f(number). Putting x, - x and 2x in pairs instead of x and y you have a great system of equations. And the result is the same: 1 + x and 1 - x
I got to the f(1)f(-1) = 0 on my own but no matter how much i toyed with it i couldnt get to the solution
Interesting. First he proves that f(x) cannot be zero for any x (6:18), then he goes on to claim this 7:34 😇
As far as i can see (frankly speaking i couldn't find any other way to solve the problem), i have to claim that f(x)=f(-x). That leads me to y=-x, hence f(x)=+-sqrt(1-x^2) where f: ]-1,1[ --> ]0,+-1].
No at 6:18 he is proving that f(x) is not zero for all x
lol I used truncated taylor series
In order to use taylor expansion you need to know that the function is differentiable, and there is no such condition given in the problem
Please don’t call it the England maths olympiad. Britain is much more than just England.
Indeed! Thanks 🙏
answer=xy
From [f(x)][1-f(0)]=0 --> f(0)=1
But not f(x)=0 and it is explained why it is so. I agree that f(x)=0 does not aplly for any x.
Now consider x≠0 and y=0:
[f(x≠0)]f(0)=f(x≠0)
--> [(f(x≠0)][1-f(0)]=0
f(0)=1 or f(x≠0)=0
Therefore f(x)=1 for x=0
=0 otherwise
Kindly give your comment sir.
what about when both(x&y) are 0?
@@sanidhyavijay2281: Two solutions you get: f(x)=1+x and f(x)=1-x both give f(0)=1. If x=y=0 LHS=[f(0)][f(0)]=1(1)=1 and RHS=f(0)=1.
The same result will be obtained with
f(x)=1 for x=0
=0 otherwise
as LHS=[f(0)][f(0)]=1(1)=1 and RHS=f(0)=1
You have already proved f(0)=1 now let y = -x
f(x)f(-x) = f(x-x) - x^2 = f(0) - x^2 = 1- x^2 = (1-x)(1+x)
clearly f(x) = 1- x or f(x) = 1+x
q.e.d.
Very nice! For some reason, i assumed immediately that it had to be even so in the end i reached [f(x)]^2=1-x^2 and y=-x. That did blind me 😞
@@Zonnymaka thanks
That's a nice way to find some solutions, but you didn't prove that there aren't others
8 * 1 = 4 * 2. It doesn't mean 8 = 4 and 1 = 2.
@@RafaelB1717It is possible to add and prove that indeed the solution fulfills the condition imposed