Speed up Mental Math 5 times in 1 Week. It Works!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 เม.ย. 2024
  • Are you unsure of how to master #consultingmath?
    Are you struggling with complicated numbers?
    Are you tired of doing quick big calculations?
    If your answer is YES, then this #mentalmath video is definitely handcrafted for you!
    If you wonder, I used to be you when I was a newbie in #managementconsulting! One of my biggest fears growing up was to be forced to do #mentalmath in pressured situations. I was really bad at negotiations that involved complicated numbers. I always got beaten in all mental math games. And… eventually, I forever failed and math was my biggest weakness.
    But once becoming a #McKinsey #consultant by making the qualitative part compensate, the reality hit me hard, and I had no other options than to dominate all #consultingmath games.
    So over time, I have developed a system of doing Math so fast in the head. After one week of intensive practice, and I became the fastest to calculate numbers among #consultants in the team. I even beat my own EM. So what’s the secret?
    ________________________
    SUGGESTED SOURCES:
    Consulting Math Fundamentals:
    mconsultingprep.com/consultin...
    How to Calculate 300% Faster in Case Interviews:
    mconsultingprep.com/consultin...
    ________________________
    Visit our website for more DETAILED GUIDES on Management Consulting Prep mconsultingprep.com/
    • McKinsey PST: mconsultingprep.com/problem-s...
    • Consulting Math: mconsultingprep.com/consultin...
    • Case Interview: mconsultingprep.com/case-inte...
    • Management Consulting Resume A-Z Guide: mconsultingprep.com/managemen...
    • Rookie Consultant Playbook: mconsultingprep.com/rookie-co....
    Read 50+ posts on our blog for insider tips and tricks on McKinsey PST and Case Interview mconsultingprep.com/blog/
    Join our community to connect with other applicants and ex-consultants: mconsultingprep.com/community/
    Practice with case partners for free: mconsultingprep.com/case-partner
    Learn with experienced ex-MBB coaches and receive quality feedback: mconsultingprep.com/coaching
    Learn more about our E2E SECRETS PROGRAM TO ACE THE CASE mconsultingprep.com/case-inte...
    Subscribe to our channels at goo.gl/ziBfQs to help us make everything available for free.
    Watch all of our VIDEOS on TH-cam at goo.gl/ziBfQs
    JOIN US ON FACEBOOK / mconsultingprep
    Hope to see you in the next video!
    ________________________
    Timestamps
    0:00 Intro
    1:23 What is Consulting Math?
    2:26 Method to do Consulting Math
    3:22 Multiplication type
    8:33 Division type
    11:26 Percentage type
    14:30 Summary - Outro

ความคิดเห็น • 154

  • @MConsultingPrep
    @MConsultingPrep  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Feel free to ask any questions in our community where you can connect with other applicants and ex-consultants: mconsultingprep.com/community/

  • @ZenityStudios
    @ZenityStudios 3 ปีที่แล้ว +322

    most people know that 1.66 * 3 = 5 hahaha never knew anyone knew that

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      haha ^^ ... but you know that by now ^^

    • @TheCharlie2l
      @TheCharlie2l ปีที่แล้ว +3

      So sad.. I am in the non people category.

    • @FenceThis
      @FenceThis 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      most people for some reason also happen to know that 3 * 17 = 51
      or that 3 * 18 = 54 and that 3 * 19 = 57
      dunno why

  • @zenvd04
    @zenvd04 3 ปีที่แล้ว +190

    For percentages, you can also break percentages down into ones and tens i.e. 32% is 10%x 3 and 1% x 2.
    So in the example above:
    32% of 651,040
    10% of 651,040 = 65104 = ~ 65,000 x 3 = 195,000
    1% of 651,040 = 6510.4 = ~ 6500 x 2 = 13,000
    Add that up and you get 208,000

  • @swarnapuri11
    @swarnapuri11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks a lot for posting. Very clear explanation. Everyone should know this method. This should be thought in school.

  • @josemunozjlm
    @josemunozjlm ปีที่แล้ว +1

    eye opening! thank you! sharing and liking!

  • @ehsansharif2296
    @ehsansharif2296 3 ปีที่แล้ว +24

    Mental math was my weak point. You saved my life! Thank you.

  • @Vinan2k
    @Vinan2k 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is extremely well guided method...thank you very much!

  • @johnanon372
    @johnanon372 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Suggest another mental math method we do in China. 1700 * 40%, for example, can be divided into 1000*0.4+700*0.4 and further divided into 1000*0.4+100*0.4*7 which equals to 400+280

  • @princedeux8923
    @princedeux8923 ปีที่แล้ว

    What a great video!

  • @junpyogoo6586
    @junpyogoo6586 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thought I was hopeless in mental math until finding yours! Keep uploading great videos like this! Thumbs uppp

  • @A7mad3emad
    @A7mad3emad 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    This is extremely practical, thank you very much for sharing such techniques!!

  • @anuraagsusarla1664
    @anuraagsusarla1664 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good approach!

  • @omorontherun
    @omorontherun 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Ahh, finally you are back with some amazing tips bro.

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks, take a look at mconsultingprep.com/consulting-math/ for more on consulting math!

  • @aleroma9236
    @aleroma9236 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    good job, good video, good method.

  • @j.t.baustatik
    @j.t.baustatik 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for sharing the tips

  • @Dree2BeFree
    @Dree2BeFree 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This was such a cool way to explain things. thanks man

  • @trangta1589
    @trangta1589 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    damn this is crazy! so easy and practical.

  • @Madalyn.Berger
    @Madalyn.Berger 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    great vid, useful tips

  • @markdodson5432
    @markdodson5432 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Kim,
    Thanks a lot for this video.
    Could you elaborate on the last adjustment there, bringing 217000 down to 210000?
    Thank you!
    Mark

  • @NguyenPham-ih2hy
    @NguyenPham-ih2hy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Glad you are back Kim, I was starting to run out of videos to watch... Great job on this one!

  • @alexandrahernandez6305
    @alexandrahernandez6305 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Great video. I am an industrial engineering student, yet I never had to challenge myself with mental math. My grandfather was very good at it given his years in sales. I have an interview approaching and this was good preparation.

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad to hear that. Set a goal to beat your grandfather :p

  • @ashishrsingh1104
    @ashishrsingh1104 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you🤜🤛

  • @trina7787
    @trina7787 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I dont understand how are you taking out zeroes in the multiplication part. can you please explain more on this?

  • @rafaeltavarez4025
    @rafaeltavarez4025 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this

  • @PhiloMusix24
    @PhiloMusix24 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you so much and I respect you for sharing what you love and can do 😍😍😍😃🙌🙌🙌🙌🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

  • @mikealike5000
    @mikealike5000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This man is a wizard

  • @maxsparrowX
    @maxsparrowX 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    wish me luck dude, I just invited to do online MCQ test though I asked to enroll in 2022. Damn need to speed up my learning. Thanks for the nice vid

  • @michelleceline8655
    @michelleceline8655 ปีที่แล้ว

    thanks!

  • @vuphuonganh9233
    @vuphuonganh9233 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Impressive Kim! Keep up the work, I am running out of time

  • @ianm1811
    @ianm1811 3 ปีที่แล้ว +54

    A better explanation on the downward and upward rounding during the multiplication portion would have been appreciated.

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hi Ian,
      Like I explained near the end of the video, it's like the feel you have when pressing more gas pedal going uphill. In the beginning, try ballpark them. With some practice, you will get the hang of it and your estimation will get better very quickly.
      If you want to be more precise, I explained in 5:15 about how to make a range ...
      Good luck with your practice! ^^

    • @PS-ls3xy
      @PS-ls3xy ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I agree... very poorly explained. The degree of the adjustment is not explained at all!

  • @jensenraylight8011
    @jensenraylight8011 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Thanks for sharing this,
    The tips was very helpfull
    Yeah, i get fear too when get into the situation that require me to fast calculate
    I want to build confidence in mental math

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Jensen,
      We are so happy to hear that our video helps. For mental math, I recommend you to visit our website for more articles on that mconsultingprep.com/case-interview/, or take a look at our Math package designed for you: mconsultingprep.com/shop/consulting-math-drills-comprehensive/

  • @tittoairlangga7715
    @tittoairlangga7715 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is so cool

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Jensen,
      We are so happy to hear that our video helps. For mental math, I recommend you to visit our website for more articles on that mconsultingprep.com/case-interview/, or take a look at our Math package designed for you: mconsultingprep.com/shop/consulting-math-drills-comprehensive/

  • @BonelessSalmons
    @BonelessSalmons 2 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    how do you feel about using your multiplication trick iteratively?
    per your ex (1662 * 6514), you could narrow it down to (16.6 * 6.5), and then narrow it further to (17 *7). Then you can iteratively do it again, making it (1.7 * 7) => (2 * 7) = 14. adjust down to 12, add the single zero to equal 120. then adjust for the initial iteration and add all the zeros there for 11,000,000.
    is this too complicated? i'm asking because basic math like 1.66 * 3 = 5 is not in my wheelhouse at all, so I don't know how I would do (1662 * 6514) with the kind of accuracy you showed in your example.

  • @ludgerderyce7312
    @ludgerderyce7312 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think you just save me and bolster my weakness and I am only halfway through the video

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      What's the status now? Given that you are all the way through the video ;)

  • @madk5864
    @madk5864 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The adjustment's are difficult to determine

  • @yequan3049
    @yequan3049 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Welcome back Kim

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Glad to be back. How long have you been a subscriber for?

  • @Gorkhepilot
    @Gorkhepilot 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank u soo much u r genious

  • @vnkc3880
    @vnkc3880 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thanks a lot

  • @jubsology
    @jubsology 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Welcome back

  • @Nonameviewer
    @Nonameviewer 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They should teach this at school

  • @Adrianna-Weeks
    @Adrianna-Weeks 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We all don't get the job we love to do, atleast someone happy with what they do.

  • @ucvutuan1164
    @ucvutuan1164 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    If the question is like: "A were to grow by 5% per year in the future". Do you have any short cut to calculate A after 10 years? Or even a way to quickly calculate it without a calculator?

  • @kiddclutch7679
    @kiddclutch7679 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    How do you adjust? It is difficult to grasp the adjusting part?

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hi Kidd,
      Like I explained near the end of the video, it's like the feel you have when pressing more gas pedal going uphill. In the beginning, try ballpark them. With some practice, you will get the hang of it and your estimation will get better very quickly.
      If you want to be more precise, I explained in 5:15 about how to make a range ...
      Good luck with your practice! ^^

  • @vaidatul82
    @vaidatul82 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    RESPECT

  • @victorhazel6349
    @victorhazel6349 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the video. Just a quick one, I'm trying to grasp what you meant by 7.8 is 2/3 from 8. Can you please explain that?

  • @samael2135
    @samael2135 4 ปีที่แล้ว +27

    so did anyone actually get the answer in 5 seconds?

    • @matthewli8028
      @matthewli8028 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      no

    • @oceanheartz717
      @oceanheartz717 4 ปีที่แล้ว +31

      Nope. I just panicked xD

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha. You guys must have got them in like ... 6 seconds ^^.

  • @rafaella9700
    @rafaella9700 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This Is not as Easy as you think It Is lol but thank you! Gonna keep practicing

  • @Uyinon
    @Uyinon 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hello, thank you for this video.
    But i'd like to know how many zeros to take out?
    Do you know how many zero's to usally take out?
    i am not so good with maths, i can be better, but i need to get into McKinsey this year.
    Please help!

    • @elietecosta9564
      @elietecosta9564 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hello. I think the number of zeros you take depends on how comfortable you are with both 2 and 1 digit multiplication. You basically choose to take how many you need in order to perform the calculation quickly.
      I want to get into McKinsey this year as well. Hope your preparation is going well.
      You may want to check secrets of mental maths by Artur Benjamin here on TH-cam.
      Good luck🤗

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great question! Don't worry about this too much. The rule of thumb is to take out zeros until the numbers become (look) easy to digest. Even if you take out one too many or one to few, you will still do the steps and eventually add back the zeros like usual. The final result accuracy will not be affected (maybe just the speed). I myself often take out # of zeros so that what's left is something like ab x c (sometimes a x c). Hope this helps! Let me know if you have more questions. ^^

  • @HuyTran-vd8gj
    @HuyTran-vd8gj หลายเดือนก่อน

    can I ask for clarification in the 5:30, how can we figure out 52 and then downgrade it to 51.5. Thank you very much

  • @joewashington8703
    @joewashington8703 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    For the multiplication portion, I don't understand what you mean of taking the zero's out. Could you elaborate a bit more?

  • @sanjeetsah9863
    @sanjeetsah9863 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Nice

  • @dr.sarah894
    @dr.sarah894 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have challenge to beat my friend thank you thank you

  • @whatamess8764
    @whatamess8764 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.... i am so unprepared for my consulting interview later this week

    • @annakaljob6005
      @annakaljob6005 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      SAME I have an consulting interview in 6 days. Noway I'll get it

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you guys are in a hurry, watch this video:
      th-cam.com/video/A9fw6R4GcDQ/w-d-xo.html

  • @roshnisomani6118
    @roshnisomani6118 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What do you mean by taking out zero? I'm unable to grasp that. Can you please help?

  • @PS-ls3xy
    @PS-ls3xy ปีที่แล้ว

    How much adjustment per decimal?

  • @amaralikhan9906
    @amaralikhan9906 4 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    how to estimate the number of zeros taken away?

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Don't worry about this too much. The rule of thumb is to take out zeros until the numbers become (look) easy to digest. Even if you take out one too many or one to few, you will still do the steps and eventually add back the zeros like usual. The final result accuracy will not be affected (maybe just the speed). I myself often take out # of zeros so that what's left is something like ab x c (sometimes a x c). Hope this helps! Let me know if you have more questions. ^^

  • @Skargar
    @Skargar 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Is there an app, where you can can be close to the result to a given percentage? Most that I find need an exact result, and then you end up doing small number stuff that's too easy.

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      This is such a great answer. I am building a tool. Please stay tuned ^^.

  • @consideredthoughts1791
    @consideredthoughts1791 ปีที่แล้ว

    If each of these calls take the 5 seconds allowed, a calculator is likely to be much faster, and more accurate.
    In fact, I was able to do the multiplication ones in prob half that time on the calculator.
    Of course, you need a calculator to hand in the first place but if you have one, it's often faster than these techniques.

  • @neliswajokweni5872
    @neliswajokweni5872 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    how did you go from 54 to 51 ??

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Hi Neliswa, you are probably asking the question of: How to properly do the Adjustment?
      Like I explained near the end of the video, it's like the feel you have when pressing more gas pedal going uphill. In the beginning, try ballpark them. With some practice, you will get the hang of it and your estimation will get better very quickly.
      If you want to be more precise, I explained in 5:15 about how to make a range ...
      Good luck with your practice! ^^

  • @steffenhaldrupandersen2391
    @steffenhaldrupandersen2391 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, I am not sure I get the 0.7 of 75 at 8:07. Could you please elaborate?

    • @vyche7882
      @vyche7882 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      0.7 taken from 8.7 : 75 x 8.7

  • @pierinapaytan6411
    @pierinapaytan6411 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How did you estimate the number of zeros taken away?

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great question! Don't worry about this too much. The rule of thumb is to take out zeros until the numbers become (look) easy to digest. Even if you take out one too many or one to few, you will still do the steps and eventually add back the zeros like usual. The final result accuracy will not be affected (maybe just the speed). I myself often take out # of zeros so that what's left is something like ab x c (sometimes a x c). Hope this helps! Let me know if you have more questions. ^^

  • @FM-dm8xj
    @FM-dm8xj 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What do you mean take away 0's?

  • @dijouxclement182
    @dijouxclement182 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I don't understand how do you put aways "zero" like why sometimes you have 4 zeros and sometimes you have 6

  • @andreslara9812
    @andreslara9812 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Kim! One question, when you have to do both an upward and downward adjustment for multiplication, which one do you choose?

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you mean when I “can” do either, which one do I prefer? Or do you mean something else? Thanks for asking^^

    • @andreslara9812
      @andreslara9812 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@MConsultingPrep Lets say 789x7173. You round up 789 and 7173 down so its 8x70. What do you do in those cases?

    • @anndee5426
      @anndee5426 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @MConsulting Prep, can you answer this question please? :D

    • @shade.9039
      @shade.9039 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@andreslara9812cancel them. Downward and upward adjustment so they cancel leaving you with 5600000

  • @emiliojacome8554
    @emiliojacome8554 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    why did you adjust to 0.7 the 75?

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Hi there,
      The reason why we adjusted to 0.7 of 75 because we have round up the number 8.7 to 8.0, thus we need to "compensate" by multiplying 75 by that 0.7. To simply visualize, the formula goes like this: 75 x 8.7 = 75 x 80 + 75 x 0.7
      Hope it helps!

  • @xkells757
    @xkells757 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Watching this and realizing that I'm f**ked for interviews... Are you doing all the steps in your head or jotting down notes? I'm struggling to keep all the zeros in my head while I do other calculations.

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      In the beginning, feel free to use paper. In fact, you can totally use the scratch paper in case interviews. As you get used to it, practice without paper too. It's a good tool to have (being able to boom boom in your head). ^^

  • @uwu-xl8mm
    @uwu-xl8mm 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    couldn’t do mental math but could quickly solve it through jotting down... maybe i’m really hopeless

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nah you are NOT! Have a little faith and keep practicing it. Btw, it's ok to jot down a few numbers during case interviews ... as long as you still do it fast! ^^

    • @priyankadey2620
      @priyankadey2620 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I do the same or use a calculator

  • @tianz4710
    @tianz4710 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    when rounding 1234 and 567, why did 1234 become 12.34 rather than 1.234? which will give quite inaccurate answer.

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hi Tian, interesting question. I am glad you asked. Basically we can both do 12.34 x 5.67 or 1.234 x 56.7. The point is to take out "enough" zeros to make it easy to calculate but not too much to make the error margin too high. To me, with multiplication, I can easily do double-digit x single-digit so this is the way to go for me.

  • @FM-dm8xj
    @FM-dm8xj 23 วันที่ผ่านมา

    How did u get 54-51?

  • @I_Arrived
    @I_Arrived 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    @8:02
    But what if you are still shit at math and can't do 72*8?

    • @junglibra
      @junglibra 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      You may wanna go back at 7:50 and realize it’s common to know 75*2=150.
      Otherwise you may still round it as 70*8, make a calculation of 7*8=56, return 1 zero, we get 560, and adjust, we have around 580.
      Dont you wanna say that you dont even know 7*8?

    • @Skargar
      @Skargar 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      do 8*8=64, 640-8=632

    • @sharonjuniorchess
      @sharonjuniorchess 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Skargar That's an 8% error the sum is (80 x 8) - (8 x 8) = 640 - 64 ≈ 570
      To reply to Eric's question:
      You could try learning to do mental multiplication left to right as it allows you to do your sums in stages: 72 x 8 = 560 + (2x8) = 576. Vedic multiplication uses this approach putting slashes between the 10's columns (although I prefer using commas) which allows you to have more than one digit result in a particular column and do the carry as you go along. So 72 x 8 becomes 56/16 = 576. The more you practice the easier it gets.
      Because vedic maths handles multiplication left-to-right you only need to do two digit multiplication by two digit to get within 5% accuracy and the steps only need to be followed to get the first two result digits (which is just three multiplication operations). For example: 23 x 87 = (2x8) , [(8x3)+(2x7)] , 0 = 16 , [24+14] , 0 = 1980 (98.95%) to get 100% add on 3 x 7 = 21.

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Appreciate the straight and funny comment ^^

  • @chrisnacoustic1510
    @chrisnacoustic1510 ปีที่แล้ว

    Putting away "zeros". My question is: where the hell are the zeros??? How many zeros should I take??

  • @joseochoa3571
    @joseochoa3571 ปีที่แล้ว

    0.7 of 75... why?

  • @kienluu6430
    @kienluu6430 ปีที่แล้ว

    the method is fabulous, but im still can not caculate them just in 5 seconds, hic

    • @aabubakerr37
      @aabubakerr37 ปีที่แล้ว

      How to take out zeros in multiplication part?

  • @fuckaII
    @fuckaII ปีที่แล้ว

    The first shit i could do it in 4 secs mentally easily 8910×547

  • @lordbyron4147
    @lordbyron4147 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    how in the name of fuck is this faster than a calculator

  • @cuikane2444
    @cuikane2444 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Maybe I'm dumb, but there is no way I can calculate the examples in just 5 seconds, on avg they took me like 20-30s

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You do not need to be accurate for those mental math. The idea here is that: you just need to get the approximate number, because in real consulting world you will need to estimate a lot.
      So try my methods to practice and estimate faster ;)

  • @AbeNXC
    @AbeNXC 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    For the answer where you found it to be 660 mil. Wouldn’t being off by 8,000,000 significantly mess up later calculations?

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      In most consulting contexts, 5% margin is acceptable. In some special cases where the interviewer needs you to be more correct, he/she will tell you. It's often beneficial to trade a little accuracy for much higher speed. ^^

  • @ivantulumovic861
    @ivantulumovic861 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sry but I dont get any of this

  • @remfa4922
    @remfa4922 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    huh

  • @davidschneider3551
    @davidschneider3551 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    i think this does not work at all, by the way is needed 25 seconds for the answer and got 760 million ;)

    • @MConsultingPrep
      @MConsultingPrep  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you have a little more faith in it and practice more, David ^^. I have seen so many people succeeded with it ... It will work! ^^

  • @aabubakerr37
    @aabubakerr37 ปีที่แล้ว

    How did you take out zeros in multiplication part?

  • @TheSharath4321
    @TheSharath4321 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I got one more trick for multiplication adjustment guys. Lets say 91847*63291 make it smaller numbers like 9.18*6.32 now round this number downwards 9*6=54 Now adjustment part. Take 1 from (9.1

  • @yewut
    @yewut 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    great vid, useful tips

  • @jayasuryab8383
    @jayasuryab8383 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    We all don't get the job we love to do, atleast someone happy with what they do.