Introduction to kinetics | Energy and enzymes | Biology | Khan Academy

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 101

  • @kamrannasir3871
    @kamrannasir3871 12 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I wish my school teacher would have been half as good as this..

  • @LiqMiPenny
    @LiqMiPenny 13 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Ah, so helpful with my classes. Didn't have a clue what the teacher was talking about, but now I have a better idea.

  • @DJDunsie
    @DJDunsie 12 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    OMG you are the best chemistry teacher ever :D I never understood this before, now I do, all thanks to you.

  • @FindWaldoAgain
    @FindWaldoAgain 12 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I finally understand! Thank you!

  • @Dschulinho
    @Dschulinho 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    thx man. your a good teacher, and you are a good guy, lessons for free your are awsome. thanks man

  • @77sarahcat
    @77sarahcat 9 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    "iogen"

  • @hiccuphadock5059
    @hiccuphadock5059 8 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    sals the best teacher out there

    • @frederickrichard1718
      @frederickrichard1718 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      the most recent comment here is 4 years old lmao

    • @parkmeadow
      @parkmeadow 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@frederickrichard1718 not anymore xdd

  • @zeehanazad
    @zeehanazad 12 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    i reeeeeallyyyyyy love ur academy, you have know idea how helpful your videos have been!

  • @Pr0x1mo
    @Pr0x1mo 15 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I know you just put this up, but can you put these videos in sequential order with the rest of your chemistry section? I have no idea which video comes after this one.

  • @sumbumfit
    @sumbumfit 10 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    You are an amazing explainer!!! Thank you, you've helped me with sooo much1

  • @42230004
    @42230004 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I was looking for the musics by kinetics and stumbled upon this video. I watched the whole thing. Good job and thanks. It made alot of sence bc i learned chem last year but we never did kinetics. Anyways keep up the good work

  • @edenabraham10
    @edenabraham10 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great way to understand the concept!

  • @xeztan
    @xeztan 8 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I

  • @CaitlinB0000
    @CaitlinB0000 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm just slightly confused by the graph you created to explain activated state and activation energy. On the video, you labeled the y-axis potential energy, but later you referred to heat helping to get up to the activated state. Does the y-axis just represent energy in general, or does heat have a way of changing potential energy that I am not familiar with? (It's late, I hope my question makes sense.)
    By the way, thanks for all the great videos!!!

  • @hgfjyrdetryu
    @hgfjyrdetryu 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    KHAN ACADEMY ROCKS!!!!!!!!

  • @xxjman1217xx
    @xxjman1217xx 10 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    How come you never did Rate Laws?

    • @danymanchster1759
      @danymanchster1759 10 ปีที่แล้ว

      rate law and reaction order and all that good stuff

  • @seannykaza9954
    @seannykaza9954 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Question 1. Yes, because for a molecule to be formed there must be an effective collision between its constituent atoms.
    Question 2. Think of it this way, if you powder something it gives more area for the other atoms or molecules to collide with it. But, if you leave something in a brick the atoms or molecules that need to interract with it are only limited to the molecules of the substance on the surface. So thus the more area available for the reaction to take place the faster the reaction.

  • @hgfjyrdetryu
    @hgfjyrdetryu 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    intermolecular activity is not considered as a chemical reaction but a physical reaction instead since phase changes (solid -> liquid) are not chemical. however im only saying that the dissociation of NaCl APPEARS similar to dissociation when melting a pure peice of salt. one is caused by addition of energy, exciting the salt, the other is caused by dipole-ion forces.
    (see next post)

  • @42paradigms
    @42paradigms 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    1. Change in concentration
    2. Change in temperature
    3. Change in surface area

  • @manojmaheshwari4055
    @manojmaheshwari4055 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    11 years back .. amazing what I feel now !

  • @hgfjyrdetryu
    @hgfjyrdetryu 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    i dont think its a chemical reaction since NaCl is an ionic solid meaning each atom is already ionized and independent. the interaction between Na and Cl seems more intermolecular than intramolecular to me because each Na+ ion is not stuck to or permanently designated to a specific Cl- ion, you could melt a pure piece of salt and the Na+ and Cl- ions could be rearranged without going under a chemical reaction
    (NaCl(s) -> NaCl(l)).
    (see next post)

  • @NASSAfellow
    @NASSAfellow 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Jordan5066 Just to note that although his equation was balanced, he said "two moles of hydrogen" and "two moles of iodine" which was technically incorrect since H2 is a mole in itself, and the same goes with I2. Correct phrasing: One mole of Hydrogen and one mole of iodine make 2 moles of Hydrogen iodide. H2 is one molecule, and I2 is also a single molecule. It was a long time ago but maybe I was trying to get at that.

  • @sciencenerd7639
    @sciencenerd7639 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    great video, thank you so much

  • @EaglesFastAndLow
    @EaglesFastAndLow 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Khan for president!

  • @pixxzel
    @pixxzel 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    if somebody could please answer this it would be great. What are the three different ways that the rate of a reaction can be affected, described in the video?

  • @DBZGotenStan
    @DBZGotenStan 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hydrogen boding with iodine - Still a better lovestory than twilight

  • @NASSAfellow
    @NASSAfellow 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Jordan5066 Silly mistake from me - at the time I must have been a bit tired (was doing a hardcore chemistry enhancement course which was really energy draining). Thanks Jordan.

  • @cloonex1
    @cloonex1 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very well presented, however a bit slow to the point

  • @hgfjyrdetryu
    @hgfjyrdetryu 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    i think what causes dissociation is key here and if dipole-ion forces are considered as a physical process instead of chemical, then dissociation of salt in water is a physical process.

  • @babypink1021
    @babypink1021 12 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks. PS: those people who are correcting him... if you know so much, why are you even watching this?! geez

  • @FauItyLogic
    @FauItyLogic 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Pr0x1mo
    There are playlists on the youtube channel. Makes watching continuous.

  • @faeinthebay
    @faeinthebay 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Works fine for me.

  • @say1226
    @say1226 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    well that is a bold assumption because it is different teaching something you know than to answer questions written by others in different manners. Although he would most likely do very well he would probably be prone to making a few errors due to wording or style of the question eventhough he understands the concepts

  • @noledjokovic1368
    @noledjokovic1368 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    This guy would get a perfect score on the MCAT

    • @name.7098
      @name.7098 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What is MCAT?

  • @chissstardestroyer
    @chissstardestroyer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    These chemicals aren't operating by chance; they are attracted to eachother via electromagnatism- very strongly attracted at that; they are frankly pulled together, due to the electrical charges in the subatomic parts of the atoms.

  • @chissstardestroyer
    @chissstardestroyer 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Reason if the temperature increases the likelihood increases is simple: temperature at the atomic scale really is the ambient energy of the atoms; so the higher the temperature, the more active they are, and the more likely they are to collide with higher force.
    Course these things never collide, and the reason for that is at the scale they are at, the electromagnetic force is easily sufficient to stop them from impacting; had they impacted, you'd have a nuclear explosion- and that'd be really bad for the scientists in the lab to put it mildly, as well as the lab in question. Frankly; I doubt very strongly you'd find anything left of the scientists or their experiment if that happened. And that's *if* you can even go near there; due to the radioactive nature of the area post an atomic explosion, as well as finding the epicenter thereof.

  • @prospectivemedic3750
    @prospectivemedic3750 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Sal, or anyone else on this episode. Am i missing something by asking this? How do you get from H2 ----- I2 = 2HI? I feel like I am not understanding this part of the process or have missed something from earlier episodes

    • @prospectivemedic3750
      @prospectivemedic3750 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      As in, if I was given 2HI in a formula, how does H2 + I2 = 2HI? Thanks

    • @prospectivemedic3750
      @prospectivemedic3750 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Unless there is a lecture on Chemical equilibrium I have missed?

  • @joshuapumarol
    @joshuapumarol 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Saves my life every time

  • @yinghouguan5591
    @yinghouguan5591 10 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Can anybody recommend me a page or book where i can i find worked examples in chemical kinetics?

    • @JafenKtair
      @JafenKtair 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      feet

  • @MrYasser643
    @MrYasser643 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Search for it>i didnt cuz i dont need to watch it,i've already studied it,search for it.

  • @funkydiva12
    @funkydiva12 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    hey which is the video that teaches us about the rate determinign step?

  • @sub-zero9772
    @sub-zero9772 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    very good

  • @KawaiiStrawberry33
    @KawaiiStrawberry33 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    I didn't think probabilistic was a word, but apparently it is!

  • @sunitatailor6434
    @sunitatailor6434 9 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    its epic

  • @vijayjuneja8534
    @vijayjuneja8534 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    thnxx...........

  • @NASSAfellow
    @NASSAfellow 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    In the beginning of the video you said '2 moles of hydrogen and 2 moles of Iodine' WRONG! It is one mole of hydrogen and one mole of Iodine which produces two moles of HI. You have two atoms of each, not two moles.

  • @sequence0902
    @sequence0902 9 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    NaCl and water forms ion dipole interaction and not polar dipole bonds, no?

  • @username6333
    @username6333 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Pr0x1mo Go to his site, the videos are in sequential order there.

  • @jijulpark3703
    @jijulpark3703 11 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    you sound like anthony bourdain

  • @minde6794
    @minde6794 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    and addition of catalyst..

  • @u218064
    @u218064 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    isn't it decrease surface area to increase rate of rxn????

  • @Pr0x1mo
    @Pr0x1mo 15 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nah, np, a couple hours after i posted that (4 months ago) he put it into a playlist.

    • @shyambhavi10
      @shyambhavi10 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      This is the oldest comment that I ever saw on utube

    • @Pr0x1mo
      @Pr0x1mo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@shyambhavi10 I'm still here, B.

    • @shyambhavi10
      @shyambhavi10 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Pr0x1mo woah! I didn't expect a reply... btw great:)

    • @Pr0x1mo
      @Pr0x1mo 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@shyambhavi10

    • @MphatsoLiandisha
      @MphatsoLiandisha ปีที่แล้ว

      This year too?

  • @MrYasser643
    @MrYasser643 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its an introduction to Kinetics..not explainin' of thermodynamic!..u can find what u want in next videos Senior

  • @SlushGuppy
    @SlushGuppy 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    What will Oxygen think!? Oh man, this is getting good.

  • @Sk.2500
    @Sk.2500 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm here because I was hearing drum n bass and I tought this was dnb too, dang school shit is chasing me ahhhhhhhh

  • @CliveReyes
    @CliveReyes 13 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    He put the dot on the C.. haha!

  • @hupper12345
    @hupper12345 14 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    iogen lol thanks dude

  • @fleshcookie
    @fleshcookie 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    6:28. Highagen Iodide? I thought it was hydrogen

  • @dawangstaman
    @dawangstaman 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    watched

  • @racquelsabesaje4562
    @racquelsabesaje4562 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    hydrogen mix other chemicals had active effects either effective

  • @badamc
    @badamc 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    there's no audio.... anybody else?

  • @Pr0x1mo
    @Pr0x1mo 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @15987532147896325 I know the original website, but when this video first came out, it wasn't in order with any other video, it is now, obviously.

  • @curtpiazza1688
    @curtpiazza1688 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great! 😂

  • @bensonwu1238
    @bensonwu1238 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Why is it Chemistry?

  • @ThePeterDislikeShow
    @ThePeterDislikeShow 11 ปีที่แล้ว

    Don't drink soda.

  • @0o0o0123
    @0o0o0123 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    Kinetics? You were going on too much about thermodynamic bro, better of explaining rate determining step, the rate expression and constant and order of reactions, video was good but irrelevant to kinetics

    • @peacefindersimply5001
      @peacefindersimply5001 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your thinking of kinetic energy, kinetics is a bit different

  • @td6063
    @td6063 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    hydrogen is like a confused chick between two guys

  • @Kafka121
    @Kafka121 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    ah yes the all new Iogene

  • @hemlock501
    @hemlock501 12 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm sure you are a nice guy and I like your videos. I don't; however, love you.

  • @StarWarsRealTalk
    @StarWarsRealTalk 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    One guy is failing his exam

  • @privateuser6590
    @privateuser6590 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Why is Khan drawing testicles at 3:13

  • @RImAPhan
    @RImAPhan 10 ปีที่แล้ว

    Salman Khan is a GOD!

  • @KillerZero259
    @KillerZero259 13 ปีที่แล้ว

    @HackneyEquine dude are you coming out of the closet? lol