I've tried a number of mics. Shure sm7b heil pr 40, heil pr35, heil pr37, telefunken m80, electrovoice Re27 nd and 320. My favorites are the heil pr 37 & 35 and the electrovoice Re320. All others I sent back. I deffinetely could not stand the shure sm7b the electrovoice Re27 or the heil pr40.
Are there any specific programs that I have to use with the RE320? I have an offbrand audio interface that im gonna be upgrading to a better quality one but whenever i shut down all my audio applications, my mic sounds horrible just by itself, its super loud and screechy etc and its not clear at all with the audio.
I wasn't going to buy the re20 but when I heard the re320, it pulled me across the line. It's a great sounding mic which still carries the legend of the re20. As far as the SM7B, I find that it sounds more like a stage mic at times, like the SM58. I know they're very similar. Certainly, any of those three mics, especially the 7B and the Re320 would be welcome in my studio, but I chose the re320 over the 7B because it sounds more open and alive to me. I also love the proximity effect it has. You don't have to stay on it as much, and I would have thought that podcasters would need that for guests who have little mic experience and tend to wonder off axis. Lastly, I think that the 7B carries a bit of a viral reputation. I feel like a lot of people just choose it because it's very recognizable and trendy, and gathers bragging rights. It's just the "cool" mic to have. Certainly, the less expensive re320 sounds just as good, if not better, but is larger, less distinct looking and less trendy. I'm almost at the point of cringing when I see the SM7B because of that. Furthermore, It sounds like a lot of people don't have it gained properly, so they're right up on it, and again that makes it sound like a stage mic.
As an American, I agree about our taste for the RE20. For a late-night AOR radio DJ it's perfect, and as you say, for a radio host you can go with a more aggressive sound -- in the case of the RE20, that bassy, slightly muffled sound.
I actually think you forgot to switch between the mics in the comparison because they sound identical there. Before in the video you heard the big difference, the sparkly quite dynamic vibe of the Re320 compared to the quite monotunous and kind sound of the sm7b.
4:20... actually, the mics you showed Ryan Seacrest and his gang using are NOT RE20s... they're RE27s... same capsule as the RE320... very different from the RE20.
@@Radiodotco Thanks for the link. How do you feel about the Procaster v SM7B ? Maybe you could do a video of these 2 mics at some point, comparing them both, since they seem to be the most well known mics within this sort of price range
My preferred mic is the EV RE320, but I don’t claim it’s “better” than the sm7b. Anyone choosing the Shure mic is making a good choice. I stay with EV.
I just watched a comparison on the Pod MIC vs the AT 2040. I think I like the audio technica The main reason why I'd choose the SM7B is bc it just looks nice 😆 but it has a high price tag
@@carlos_mann No but Ive heard good things about it, if you like the style of the sm7b you are probably going to like the pd70, it is also a little brighter if thats your thing.
I actually think YOU sound better on the lapel mic you used at the beginning of this. The SM-7B has too much proximity effect and needs a pop filter in addition to the windscreen. The RE-320 sounds tinny and weak, but the proximity effect is controlled better. I have used an RE-20 for decades, in both radio and (mostly) a narrator's booth, and love it. I tried the 7B several times, and like it for some alto female voices. I like the RE-27 for quiet people with muffled voices. I like the RE-320 for deep bass voices. But as an all-around flat vocal mic that gives you an honest response, it is hard to beat the RE-20. Of course, with judicious EQ and compression, they can be made to work with just about any voice.
The audio quality in the comparison segment took a huge dip, not sure why. The audio got muffled/boxy sounding in comparison to the clips earlier in the video.
Raw unfiltered audio is being used. Whereas before we were using lav mics with processed audio. Big difference, but wanted to do a fair comparison. Also, please subscribe 😉
@@Radiodotco Oh sorry no I mean when you're talking directly into it at 3:50, it sounds completely different to the same microphone during the comparison. I assume that's just some sort of processing? Subscribed. :)
@@AintThatRich I also noticed this, and thought it was a bit odd. You can definitely hear the wider low-end response of SM7b in the earlier part of the video vs the comparison.
The more I listen to these broadcast setups, especially the SM7B, the more I dislike the sound. It is so nasally and sounds like you a putting a blanket over the mic. I prefer the more airy, brighter tone of the RE320 but that might also be too nasally for me.
Finally someone who does accept the re320 to sound better than re20 for voice
I think it all comes down to preference personally (but the RE320 is a beast in my opinion).
Opinions. Everyone has them. There would be one mic for all of us to use if we all wanted the same sound. Glad you like the 320. I prefer the re20.
I agree, I tend to prefer the RE320 to the RE20's sound. I have used the RE320 for years.
I think it just depends on your voice. Similar in design, so it's just choosing the right one for your tones.
I've tried a number of mics. Shure sm7b heil pr 40, heil pr35, heil pr37, telefunken m80, electrovoice Re27 nd and 320. My favorites are the heil pr 37 & 35 and the electrovoice Re320. All others I sent back.
I deffinetely could not stand the shure sm7b the electrovoice Re27 or the heil pr40.
Are there any specific programs that I have to use with the RE320? I have an offbrand audio interface that im gonna be upgrading to a better quality one but whenever i shut down all my audio applications, my mic sounds horrible just by itself, its super loud and screechy etc and its not clear at all with the audio.
I’d love to see this again but throw in the Se Dynacaster. Great video!
Owwww good idea!
I wasn't going to buy the re20 but when I heard the re320, it pulled me across the line. It's a great sounding mic which still carries the legend of the re20. As far as the SM7B, I find that it sounds more like a stage mic at times, like the SM58. I know they're very similar. Certainly, any of those three mics, especially the 7B and the Re320 would be welcome in my studio, but I chose the re320 over the 7B because it sounds more open and alive to me. I also love the proximity effect it has. You don't have to stay on it as much, and I would have thought that podcasters would need that for guests who have little mic experience and tend to wonder off axis. Lastly, I think that the 7B carries a bit of a viral reputation. I feel like a lot of people just choose it because it's very recognizable and trendy, and gathers bragging rights. It's just the "cool" mic to have. Certainly, the less expensive re320 sounds just as good, if not better, but is larger, less distinct looking and less trendy. I'm almost at the point of cringing when I see the SM7B because of that. Furthermore, It sounds like a lot of people don't have it gained properly, so they're right up on it, and again that makes it sound like a stage mic.
As an American, I agree about our taste for the RE20. For a late-night AOR radio DJ it's perfect, and as you say, for a radio host you can go with a more aggressive sound -- in the case of the RE20, that bassy, slightly muffled sound.
Exactly! But it's all about preference and what you expect to hear though as well.
Hi from Oz. I have the SM7B and RE320 on order with the Black Friday sales. It should be here in 3 or 4 days. Can't wait to try a comparison.
Did you experience a difference?
@joekhamoushow a magnificent mic. Very happy with it.
@@johnheiser2604- Which one did you prefer? The SM7B or the RE320?
I actually think you forgot to switch between the mics in the comparison because they sound identical there. Before in the video you heard the big difference, the sparkly quite dynamic vibe of the Re320 compared to the quite monotunous and kind sound of the sm7b.
Both are fine mics.
My voice can be a bit nasal and I find the SM7b is more flattering with the way I sound when using it.
Both mics cater to a range of voices, but deeper ones sound really good on either (in my opinion).
*Thank's for this excellent comparaison !*
4:20... actually, the mics you showed Ryan Seacrest and his gang using are NOT RE20s... they're RE27s... same capsule as the RE320... very different from the RE20.
Ryan Seacrest uses an Electrovoice RE27ND (Gold), not an RE320 or RE20.
😣 Yeah, just realised. But getting the RE27ND to do a comparison against the RE320, so stay tuned.
I consider Shure SM5B, to be the best microphone ! I used it ower 20 year, on an FM station. The best dynamic voice microphon ever.
Thanks for the insight, cheers!
🙇♀️
Isn't the Rode Procaster an option between these 2 mics ?
Correct - here's it in action: radio.co/blog/rode-procaster-for-broadcasters
@@Radiodotco Thanks for the link. How do you feel about the Procaster v SM7B ? Maybe you could do a video of these 2 mics at some point, comparing them both, since they seem to be the most well known mics within this sort of price range
My preferred mic is the EV RE320, but I don’t claim it’s “better” than the sm7b. Anyone choosing the Shure mic is making a good choice. I stay with EV.
love the Shure but that Electro is nice too
The Shure has a better look in my opinion. But audio quality-wise, the RE320 sounds better (for radio anyways).
I def like the re320 for my voice. I also think the EV flatters your voice, as opposed to the sm7b, which to my ears make you sound nasal.
What software being used at 0:48?
WideOrbit - full setup shown from the clip here: radio.co/blog/radio-station-equipment-professional-studio
re320 is honestly worth its weight in gold. It's a Finished microphone.
I have the re20, and re320. I myself also prefer the 320.
Any reason why?
thank you
I just watched a comparison on the Pod MIC vs the AT 2040. I think I like the audio technica
The main reason why I'd choose the SM7B is bc it just looks nice 😆 but it has a high price tag
Yeah, it does look good. Plus, it gets used by popular broadcasters/podcasters a lot.
@@Radiodotco
Yes very true. I tend to see a lot of podcasters using that one & the MV7. Which is another one I tend to really like as well
look into the PD70, its a 100 dollar SM7B clone
@@Altair4611
Oohh really 👀 🤔 imma check this one out!
Are tou speaking from experience from being an user of both?
@@carlos_mann No but Ive heard good things about it, if you like the style of the sm7b you are probably going to like the pd70, it is also a little brighter if thats your thing.
I actually think YOU sound better on the lapel mic you used at the beginning of this. The SM-7B has too much proximity effect and needs a pop filter in addition to the windscreen. The RE-320 sounds tinny and weak, but the proximity effect is controlled better. I have used an RE-20 for decades, in both radio and (mostly) a narrator's booth, and love it. I tried the 7B several times, and like it for some alto female voices. I like the RE-27 for quiet people with muffled voices. I like the RE-320 for deep bass voices. But as an all-around flat vocal mic that gives you an honest response, it is hard to beat the RE-20. Of course, with judicious EQ and compression, they can be made to work with just about any voice.
We’ll, to be fair, “with judicious EQ and compression “, pretty much ANY decent mic can be tailored to any voice.
I prefer the look of the re320 and the sound of the re20
Slimmer darker design does look pretty.
The audio quality in the comparison segment took a huge dip, not sure why. The audio got muffled/boxy sounding in comparison to the clips earlier in the video.
Raw unfiltered audio is being used. Whereas before we were using lav mics with processed audio. Big difference, but wanted to do a fair comparison. Also, please subscribe 😉
@@Radiodotco Oh sorry no I mean when you're talking directly into it at 3:50, it sounds completely different to the same microphone during the comparison. I assume that's just some sort of processing? Subscribed. :)
@@AintThatRich I also noticed this, and thought it was a bit odd. You can definitely hear the wider low-end response of SM7b in the earlier part of the video vs the comparison.
RE27 beats both.
Big words. How come?
The more I listen to these broadcast setups, especially the SM7B, the more I dislike the sound. It is so nasally and sounds like you a putting a blanket over the mic. I prefer the more airy, brighter tone of the RE320 but that might also be too nasally for me.
Re 20 sounds better with your voice
Naaaww thanks ❤️
Dont aim the mic up your nose as it makes your tone very nasaly. Aim it down at your throat.
Guessing mic a electrovoice Re320 mic b shure sm7b