Movie showing convolution of the impulse train with the sinc: 18:55 (reconstruction of the original signal). Zero order hold vs first order hold: 19:00.
+Phanindra Yerramilli The impulse response for sync case is infinitely non causal since h(t) extends to -(infinity), wheras triangular impusle response h(t) is finitely non causal and realizable with a delay corresponding to the the time it extends in negative time axis.....
Thank you sir, actually I'm very confused about this topic before seeing this video now i get clarity
Note to self. very good Sinc x over x starts at 6:14
Movie showing convolution of the impulse train with the sinc: 18:55 (reconstruction of the original signal).
Zero order hold vs first order hold: 19:00.
wow spring 2011 was way longer ago than i thought.
Super
The triangular function is also non causal right? Is that not ideal again (like the sync response)?
+Phanindra Yerramilli The impulse response for sync case is infinitely non causal since h(t) extends to -(infinity), wheras triangular impusle response h(t) is finitely non causal and realizable with a delay corresponding to the the time it extends in negative time axis.....
At 43:02, look at the equation in blue at the top of the screen. Shouldn't the variable of summation be 'n' instead of 'k'?
Here is a practical application of the Sinc Interpolation with a software for Oscilloscopes: th-cam.com/video/1W8B4rQeumM/w-d-xo.html
That's nice
Wow
What had happened was.....