Hario V60 vs. Graycano Brewer | $10 vs $100 Pour Over Brewer

V60 - amzn.to/47aXjlr
"Neat" Coffee Glass - amzn.to/47p1dad
DF64 Gen 2 Grinders - shorturl.at/oDJ45
Amazon Orea - amzn.to/40uc1BK
15% Off Coffee - goodbrotherscoffee.com/discou...
SearchPean S1 - amzn.to/408n2Z2
Amazon Coffee Tools - amzn.to/3L4Ngpv
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases

[@Laminar-Flow]

Hoon, I have a Paris Rhône gooseneck and it’s phenomenal for the money. Uses a Negative Temperature Coefficient thermistor which is a British made, great quality and very accurate. It’s not as high quality as my Stagg pro, but man, it’s awesome for ~50 bucks. You should so a video comparing a few kettles (please include this one though) in terms of heating time, temperature accuracy, flow, etc. I don’t see many of these types of videos from a coffee enthusiast perspective and for those making pour over on a budget, a cheap gooseneck vs a tea kettle makes a big difference!

[@MagicLover822]

Man also graycano vs v60 vs Kono would be fun, but the same grinder

[@user-il5rl8tl8r]

On graycano except the special edition graycano sibarist can you use just the cone fast sibarist?? Is it any problem on extraction with the cone sibarist?

[@silvioliker4252]

Can you please repeat type of recommended papers for Graycano. Thx

[@lukesp5721]

As someone who has designed drippers the difference between most drippers nowdays pseudoscience. Yes you have fast, slow, heat conductive, insulating... But what actually make a much larger difference is H20, *filter paper*, grinder.
Cheers

[@rivellehaidar318]

As long as it has effect to the taste, you cannot call it pseudoscience. I agree that most drippers don't really have significant effect, theyre just gimmick. But when i compare hario v60 glass, and kinto ceramics, the taste is completely distinguishable.

[@lukesp5721]

@@rivellehaidar318 Pseudoscience distorts or manipulates scientific concepts or kernels of truth to bolster unfounded claims or beliefs. In the world of drippers there is quite a lot of "gray" area, there these "claims" usually don't even have scientific data to back it up let alone exaggerate it. For instance, attributing an improvement in aroma and sweetness solely to a specific coffee dripper without substantial empirical scientific evidence would fall under pseudoscience, failing to adhere to any scientific standards to prove it.
While variations in brewing equipment, such as using a V60 versus a Kinto, may produce differences, most home brewers willing to modify multiple variables like grind setting, water temperature, and mineral content and can achieve very similar outcomes. Hence, asserting that a single variable significantly influences the quality of the brew (like a dripper) overlooks the collective impact of factors mentioned in my last post like water quality, filter paper, and grinder, which help in attaining far greater results in the final cup verses a single dripper. But the companies selling dripper would never tell you this, plus people want to feel good about their purchase so they will naturally choose to believe these unfounded scientific claims.