I cannot thank you enough for these lectures!!! as a double major in humanities and philosophy, the phenomenology course I took this past semester (which was literally a graduate-level class poorly disguised as a 300 level undergraduate course) flipped my entire world upside down and your videos were paramount to understanding key Heideggerian and Husserlian concepts throughout the past several months. They have truly helped me gain a deep appreciation and love for phenomenology as a philosophical discipline/method despite how challenging it was 98 percent of the time
Hey that's my comment that course was terrible, oh you wanna call your self Adam in a temporal subdivision of reality called Dasein with some bogus transcdental arguments about being-in-the-world he just sits there on his computer, and we just want to but in the everyday.
Yeah they won't let you do the phenomenology of time or reverse your temporality into the present at hand. They have bots who tried. That's absolute sausage. That's not that difficult it's a continuous emergence in being in the world if they let you in. Now you struggle with meaning for the entire crises of phenomology in time. You shouldn't have to. Oh well. Write all this stuff, struggle with interlocked concepts that makes your historicity irrelevant?
I will be watching these as I renew my readings of Being and Time. Your video is clear and well made. Much better than most videos on TH-cam. Thank you for the time you have put down, Sir.
Subscribed when I heard you say Heidegger and Wittgenstein are the two most important philosophers of the 20th century! Professors like you make me wish I could afford to go to college, great video!
Great job on the introduction to “Being and Time” and Heidegger, his history, and relation to Husserl. Really great video notes as well. Thanks for sharing.
I have been watching a few of your videos and I'm getting a small being and time reading group together for the summer. I will follow your helpful videos alongside my reading of being and time. Thanks so much for posting all of these phenomenology videos. I can't believe you don't have more views.
I`m a bit of a novice at Heidegger, but I`d just like to say I really appreciate your video. Now I`m going to take a break and wonder about the Being behind all the entities around me. Dasein!
so much helpful in und sth about Heidegger is trying to say. can u explain with example the difference between being and entities. can't really figure out
is there any way you could clink the slides? My college has moved solely online and they would be a good resource for me to study with if you would not mind?
Brilliant explanation! One small correction though: "Da" means "there", so "Dasein" translates into "being there", even though you can say "da!" when you point at something.
This is great. I am looking forward to this rest. I don't know why I am here? - I am kind of thrown here (ha ha ha ha... swoo...). There is no benefit to anyone at the moment on my present section of the path I am on that I can see - I think I am mainly trying to acquire Heidegger as a form of cuddly teddy bear I can hold onto before I explore the nasty Nietzsche. If I have this right? - it is interesting to me how Hiedegger's and Neitzche's cosmology ("thrown" versus "eternal recurrance"?) seem to differ. Thanks :)
+KayButtonJay Good question. Being cannot be categorized in the same way as entities because entities are beings. It is not that Being impacts entities because entities would not exist without Being because they are beings. The other problem here is that Being is not a category in the same way that other categories are categories for similar reasons. All categories are categories only insofar as they are or have being. Ironically, it would be a category mistake to treat being as a category. At best, we can only say that being is analogical to a universal category. It is universal, but its universality is not of the same logical order. I hope this makes some sense. It is a good question but I fear the answer is quite opaque. Heidegger would insist that the difficulty here precisely exemplifies the manner in which the question of the meaning of being is barely intelligible for us.
I wrote a song based on these lectures. It really resonated with me as a musician. I hate self promotion, but I feel compelled to do it here. soundcloud.com/push-button-press/dasein
Hi Mark, do you think someday the Israeli Jews will also be labeled Sionazis for the systematic decimation and annihilation of Palestinian Arabs? What is your take on this? Is this a psychological matter of a race that was preyed upon during Nazi Germany and has become morally and psychologically corrupted or is it a metaphysical matter and should be studied from a phenomenological point of view?
I think it was a good thing that you mentioned that the genocide was not only involving the Jewish people but others too. Now on the question of Nazi party, is it the case that the ideology itself has a lots to do with mobilization of the masses for a political and economic reasons like let say for example the case with the crusaders and the colonial power? And in the two cases of the crusaders and the Nazi the Jewish people were prosecuted. What I am trying to say Nazi German were responding to the ww 1 results and used this kind of ideology for mobilization and it was the competition between the economic power of capitalism at that time that led to ww2 not because of ther reasons. The destruction of Germany and other European countries were precisely the destruction of competitors at the economic level no more no less.
Heidegger's political practice can be seen as the over-enlightenment of reason, which is discussed in Frankfurt School and so on. Moreover, Zizek, in the ticklish subject, argues that Heidegger's Being and Time is a very political book precisely because his lack of Kant's transcendental imagination led to Nazi political practice.
By advising them not to delve into philosophy before exploring anthropology and the basic principles of ecology, they should then commence with pre-Socratic philosophies. While doing so, they should think sociologically about how philosophy is influenced by social organization. In my view, when analyzing philosophy from the perspective of cognitive science, it appears that initially, humans engaged in activities without the need to abstract their actions. Due to ecological changes (more and easier access to food equals more time for abstract thinking), humans began to engage in verbal politics, as opposed to physical politics. Verbal politics then dominated both religion and the practice of religion. From this point, abstraction was on an exponential curve. The Hellenistic epoch, the Axial Age, and Platonic and Socratic thinking began to reflect back on ‘doing things’, but this time with a cognitive schema whose a priori is ‘to think abstractly about or into’ actions, with abstractness becoming an integral part of cognition. This locks the mind into an inability to not think abstractly, as this is necessary to understand being and doing. Hegel and phenomenology then collapse the dualism of the philosophy of cognition into monism. So to answer your question, you tell the kid to go play outside!
I cannot thank you enough for these lectures!!! as a double major in humanities and philosophy, the phenomenology course I took this past semester (which was literally a graduate-level class poorly disguised as a 300 level undergraduate course) flipped my entire world upside down and your videos were paramount to understanding key Heideggerian and Husserlian concepts throughout the past several months. They have truly helped me gain a deep appreciation and love for phenomenology as a philosophical discipline/method despite how challenging it was 98 percent of the time
Hey that's my comment that course was terrible, oh you wanna call your self Adam in a temporal subdivision of reality called Dasein with some bogus transcdental arguments about being-in-the-world he just sits there on his computer, and we just want to but in the everyday.
Yeah they won't let you do the phenomenology of time or reverse your temporality into the present at hand. They have bots who tried. That's absolute sausage. That's not that difficult it's a continuous emergence in being in the world if they let you in. Now you struggle with meaning for the entire crises of phenomology in time. You shouldn't have to. Oh well. Write all this stuff, struggle with interlocked concepts that makes your historicity irrelevant?
I will be watching these as I renew my readings of Being and Time. Your video is clear and well made. Much better than most videos on TH-cam. Thank you for the time you have put down, Sir.
Subscribed when I heard you say Heidegger and Wittgenstein are the two most important philosophers of the 20th century! Professors like you make me wish I could afford to go to college, great video!
Great job on the introduction to “Being and Time” and Heidegger, his history, and relation to Husserl. Really great video notes as well. Thanks for sharing.
I have been watching a few of your videos and I'm getting a small being and time reading group together for the summer. I will follow your helpful videos alongside my reading of being and time. Thanks so much for posting all of these phenomenology videos. I can't believe you don't have more views.
Thank you for helping me decode the "quagmire of German idealism" - it was well worth the effort - incredible stuff!
extremely helpful - you are a very skilled teacher! thx a lot
Thanks for making this video! Heidegger is definitely dense reading material and this video helps break it down.
I`m a bit of a novice at Heidegger, but I`d just like to say I really appreciate your video. Now I`m going to take a break and wonder about the Being behind all the entities around me. Dasein!
Thank you for the vide. I love Being and Time
Great summary. Thank you!
This is fantastic! thanks
Can you talk about the Debate of Dabos (between Heidegger and Ernest Casirerr) please?
Thanks a lot. Great lecture.
so much helpful in und sth about Heidegger is trying to say. can u explain with example the difference between being and entities. can't really figure out
what software do you se to make these diagrams?
is there any way you could clink the slides? My college has moved solely online and they would be a good resource for me to study with if you would not mind?
Is their a working definition of "analytic" (as a noun)? I'd it just a particularl instantiation of analysis (mode of induction, scope, etc)?
qhich is the best husserl text to read, PI or IDEAS?
For phenomenology, Ideas I, but the “Logical Investigations” is the best written book in my opinion.
Brilliant explanation! One small correction though: "Da" means "there", so "Dasein" translates into "being there", even though you can say "da!" when you point at something.
Thankyou so much. Really simplified it.
This is great. I am looking forward to this rest. I don't know why I am here? - I am kind of thrown here (ha ha ha ha... swoo...). There is no benefit to anyone at the moment on my present section of the path I am on that I can see - I think I am mainly trying to acquire Heidegger as a form of cuddly teddy bear I can hold onto before I explore the nasty Nietzsche. If I have this right? - it is interesting to me how Hiedegger's and Neitzche's cosmology ("thrown" versus "eternal recurrance"?) seem to differ. Thanks :)
Why does Heidegger assume that Being can't be categorized in the same way as the things Being impacts?
+KayButtonJay
Good question. Being cannot be categorized in the same way as entities because entities are beings. It is not that Being impacts entities because entities would not exist without Being because they are beings. The other problem here is that Being is not a category in the same way that other categories are categories for similar reasons. All categories are categories only insofar as they are or have being. Ironically, it would be a category mistake to treat being as a category. At best, we can only say that being is analogical to a universal category. It is universal, but its universality is not of the same logical order. I hope this makes some sense. It is a good question but I fear the answer is quite opaque. Heidegger would insist that the difficulty here precisely exemplifies the manner in which the question of the meaning of being is barely intelligible for us.
Parmenides 'that which is is, that which is not is not' is Heidegger no?
Thank you very much.
I don't think Husserl was forced to retire (in 1928). He is often confused with a later professor who was forced to retire..
I wrote a song based on these lectures. It really resonated with me as a musician. I hate self promotion, but I feel compelled to do it here. soundcloud.com/push-button-press/dasein
It's actually really cool man! Thanks for sharing.
Heidegger proves that Metaphysics can be dissociated from Ethics
It went back all the way to byzantines and that 300 AD x 3 phenomology of Dasein of the roman empire. They did it 3 times.
thanks for this
Hi Mark, do you think someday the Israeli Jews will also be labeled Sionazis for the systematic decimation and annihilation of Palestinian Arabs? What is your take on this?
Is this a psychological matter of a race that was preyed upon during Nazi Germany and has become morally and psychologically corrupted or is it a metaphysical matter and should be studied from a phenomenological point of view?
Thx 👍
I think it was a good thing that you mentioned that the genocide was not only involving the Jewish people but others too. Now on the question of Nazi party, is it the case that the ideology itself has a lots to do with mobilization of the masses for a political and economic reasons like let say for example the case with the crusaders and the colonial power? And in the two cases of the crusaders and the Nazi the Jewish people were prosecuted. What I am trying to say Nazi German were responding to the ww 1 results and used this kind of ideology for mobilization and it was the competition between the economic power of capitalism at that time that led to ww2 not because of ther reasons. The destruction of Germany and other European countries were precisely the destruction of competitors at the economic level no more no less.
Heidegger's political practice can be seen as the over-enlightenment of reason, which is discussed in Frankfurt School and so on. Moreover, Zizek, in the ticklish subject, argues that Heidegger's Being and Time is a very political book precisely because his lack of Kant's transcendental imagination led to Nazi political practice.
Would you accept a challenge? How would you describe Heidegger's phenomenology to a child? :)
By advising them not to delve into philosophy before exploring anthropology and the basic principles of ecology, they should then commence with pre-Socratic philosophies. While doing so, they should think sociologically about how philosophy is influenced by social organization.
In my view, when analyzing philosophy from the perspective of cognitive science, it appears that initially, humans engaged in activities without the need to abstract their actions. Due to ecological changes (more and easier access to food equals more time for abstract thinking), humans began to engage in verbal politics, as opposed to physical politics. Verbal politics then dominated both religion and the practice of religion. From this point, abstraction was on an exponential curve. The Hellenistic epoch, the Axial Age, and Platonic and Socratic thinking began to reflect back on ‘doing things’, but this time with a cognitive schema whose a priori is ‘to think abstractly about or into’ actions, with abstractness becoming an integral part of cognition. This locks the mind into an inability to not think abstractly, as this is necessary to understand being and doing. Hegel and phenomenology then collapse the dualism of the philosophy of cognition into monism.
So to answer your question, you tell the kid to go play outside!
Freiburg not Frieburg
Real cowboy 😂
Hall Cynthia Perez Thomas Rodriguez Sandra
*42.*
Can;t get past your pronunciation of Husserl. Sorry.