Indeed Shaykh Salih Al Fawzaan and Shaykh Ibn Baaz said this, and they said that there is ijmaa' upon there qawl. But as far as I know, Shaykh Ibn Uthaymin had two opinions upon this, and I don't know upon which from the two he died. Shaykh Muhammad Aman Al Jaami also followed another opinion. I also don't know for sure the opinion of Shaykh Muhammad ibn 'Abdil-Wahhaab, because from the zaahir of some of his aqwal it leads to that he does do immediate takfir upon shirk akbar, but from other aqwal it looks like he excuses shirk akbar if the person is ignorant. Don't call the one side that gives an excuse for ignorance with shirk akbar murji'ah, and don't call the one side that does immediate takfir upon shirk akbar khawarij.
@@emirio6469 No sheikh Ibn Uthaymeen didn’t believe in udhr bil jahl th-cam.com/video/GXZyBVHca9U/w-d-xo.htmlsi=DQftONyWyn-6b_1H And in there in the comments I posted 10+ fatwas of the sheikh where he says there no udhr bil Jahl. + Sheikh Salih al Fawzan also said that sheikh Ibn Uthaymeen didn’t believe in udhr bil jahl. As for Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab, he takfir’d those who give udhr bil jahl. Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab (رحمه الله): علماء المشركين اليوم يقرون أنه الشرك الأكبر، ولا ينكرونه، فأكثر أحوالهم يقرون أنه الشرك الأكبر، ولكن يعتذرون بأن أهله لم تبلغهم الدعوة "Today scholars of the Mushrikīn admit that it (worshiping other than Allah) is major shirk and do not deny it. But they excuse its people by claiming that the message has not reached them." 📚Durar us-Saniyyah (9/424) --- Sheikh (رحمه الله) labels those who excuse shirk, as “scholars of the Mushrikīn”, even though they admit that those actions are shirk And how did the “scholars of the Mushrikīn” excuse those people? “By claiming that the message has not reached them” (‘udhr bil-Jahl)
Alhamdulillah. May Allah curse the murjiah who lie against our chaykh.
“A believer is the one who doesn’t curse”
Where’d you get this clip
Indeed Shaykh Salih Al Fawzaan and Shaykh Ibn Baaz said this, and they said that there is ijmaa' upon there qawl.
But as far as I know, Shaykh Ibn Uthaymin had two opinions upon this, and I don't know upon which from the two he died. Shaykh Muhammad Aman Al Jaami also followed another opinion. I also don't know for sure the opinion of Shaykh Muhammad ibn 'Abdil-Wahhaab, because from the zaahir of some of his aqwal it leads to that he does do immediate takfir upon shirk akbar, but from other aqwal it looks like he excuses shirk akbar if the person is ignorant.
Don't call the one side that gives an excuse for ignorance with shirk akbar murji'ah, and don't call the one side that does immediate takfir upon shirk akbar khawarij.
@@emirio6469 No sheikh Ibn Uthaymeen didn’t believe in udhr bil jahl
th-cam.com/video/GXZyBVHca9U/w-d-xo.htmlsi=DQftONyWyn-6b_1H
And in there in the comments I posted 10+ fatwas of the sheikh where he says there no udhr bil Jahl.
+ Sheikh Salih al Fawzan also said that sheikh Ibn Uthaymeen didn’t believe in udhr bil jahl.
As for Muhammad ibn Abdul Wahhab, he takfir’d those who give udhr bil jahl.
Sheikh Muhammad Ibn Abdul-Wahhab (رحمه الله):
علماء المشركين اليوم يقرون أنه الشرك الأكبر، ولا ينكرونه، فأكثر أحوالهم يقرون أنه الشرك الأكبر، ولكن يعتذرون بأن أهله لم تبلغهم الدعوة
"Today scholars of the Mushrikīn admit that it (worshiping other than Allah) is major shirk and do not deny it. But they excuse its people by claiming that the message has not reached them."
📚Durar us-Saniyyah (9/424)
---
Sheikh (رحمه الله) labels those who excuse shirk, as “scholars of the Mushrikīn”, even though they admit that those actions are shirk
And how did the “scholars of the Mushrikīn” excuse those people?
“By claiming that the message has not reached them” (‘udhr bil-Jahl)
@@emirio6469 I’m not calling them Murji’ah, the shuyookh are calling them Murji’ah, all I do is translate their fatwas.
@ sheikh Salih al-Usaymī said this is about applying the ahkām, but the sheikh did takfir them
@ sheikh Fawzan says whoever excuses ignorance is worse than grave worshippers, what do u think of that?