Cell Phone EMF-Blocking Products - A Real World Test

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 526

  • @victorsawe6915
    @victorsawe6915 5 ปีที่แล้ว +299

    The problem is not the cellphone companies, it is us. We complain that these towers are causing all these problems but are the first in line when apple launches a product or complain that the wifi is too slow. We need to wake up and stop playing the blame game!

    • @24amitchell
      @24amitchell 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      facts!!!!! so demanding bigger and “better”

    • @elektro7tube
      @elektro7tube 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      how? what are the options if we don't use phones?

    • @secundusytp4517
      @secundusytp4517 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      The problem is the cell phone companies. They are choosing to poison us and don't give a damn whether we want it or not. Don't try to shift the blame to us because of the unaware ones.

    • @secundusytp4517
      @secundusytp4517 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@TheSonnetPrince The entire system is broken but that does not take even an inch of blame away from the people who have benefited from it's corruption. It doesn't matter if others would do evil instead of you, should you not occupy that position, there exists no justification for the evil they do.
      5G will lead to the direct death of millions of people of which they are directly responsible. Do not blame the people who are unaware with their lives being destroyed. Blame the serial killers (I mean CEOs) slaughtering them.

    • @lionheart4529
      @lionheart4529 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Secundus nah you need to get blamed.

  • @purplepride94
    @purplepride94 4 ปีที่แล้ว +126

    Damn...can we go back to the payphone era? Lol

    • @MKultraInstinct
      @MKultraInstinct 4 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      Makes u wonder why they want WiFi stations on every other block lol

    • @missconduct6190
      @missconduct6190 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yep

    • @johnmadden52
      @johnmadden52 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Haha so fanny

    • @seanhoare7639
      @seanhoare7639 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No that's clearly not enough we should use 2 tin cans & a long piece of string...

  • @jvb654
    @jvb654 5 ปีที่แล้ว +205

    “... The FCC notes that there’s no scientific evidence ...” Isn’t that what the tobacco companies initially said? Besides, WHY IS THE FCC IN CHARGE of what may or may not AFFECT OUR HEALTH?

    • @MsRain49
      @MsRain49 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      $$$

    • @deanmindock3680
      @deanmindock3680 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      The FCC is lying through its teeth. Peeps who complain are conspiracy theorists and anti progress.. Uh huh. Cancer rates are already off the charts, especially in the very young and with 5G, the cancer rate will increase at the same rate as the towers are setup and activated. 5G is much much stronger than 4G, way more than 100 times.

    • @lacedhayes887
      @lacedhayes887 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Dean Mindock I live in a small apartment. My neighbors already have 5g. It pulses through the walls 24/7. I don’t know what to do. I don’t have money to move🤦‍♂️ I hate this

    • @lacedhayes887
      @lacedhayes887 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      bitchute youtube it’s my neighbors

    • @RMHonkane
      @RMHonkane 4 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Literrally everyone saying 5g is dangerous is wrong just listen to actual scientist and the people Who have ACTULLY TESTED this stuff. The 5G towers would not be up and working if it was dangerous. So please trust the people Who actually have the training and experience studying and testing these things that you are fighting againts.

  • @justinferguson9779
    @justinferguson9779 4 ปีที่แล้ว +75

    No the best way to end radiation from phones and cell towers is to refuse their phones and equipment.

    • @jeanettejamison1045
      @jeanettejamison1045 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      TV , watches, and Computer too

    • @WizardofGOP
      @WizardofGOP 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      @@jeanettejamison1045 No, just use ethernet cable to connect. Faster, safer, more secure and reliable.

    • @juanthefreak331
      @juanthefreak331 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WizardofGOP are u dumb? U cant just plug in an ethernet and expect the wifi to be turned off u have to like go in the router settings and disable wireless and if that doesnt work then just put a bunch of cinder blocks around the router

    • @WizardofGOP
      @WizardofGOP 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@juanthefreak331 My God are narcissists ever stupid and then accuse others of being dumb. *sigh*. Very good, Blessed Be The World, in advanced settings, etc. Some routers do not allow for wi-fri to be turned off, as well. It is up to the people to ensure they have control over the technology in their household and to limit their exposure confronting corporations if need be. Thank-you for delving into the minutia of it all. Aluminum, as we use in X-ray to remove soft photons, works quite well as shielding for wireless, however, it would need to be grounded, it will overheat the router if it is fully enclosed, etc. In other words, just turn it off and use only a wired network.

    • @socloseagain4298
      @socloseagain4298 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WizardofGOP I used a cable internet only, no Wi-Fi in the house, but is that good enough? Or should I shield my PC with aluminum aswell to be safer?

  • @rebeccagreen7241
    @rebeccagreen7241 4 ปีที่แล้ว +69

    I'd love to see the whole interview! This guy seems to know his stuff, and I'm sure he shared a lot more valuable knowledge than they were able to include

    • @WizardofGOP
      @WizardofGOP 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

      That is Michael Neuert and he has videos here on TH-cam.

    • @rebeccagreen7241
      @rebeccagreen7241 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@WizardofGOP Thank you! Will go learn more! 🙂

    • @Gigachad-mc5qz
      @Gigachad-mc5qz 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      He sounds like a retard

    • @holographicfrog1503
      @holographicfrog1503 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah this is the problem with news channels in general outside of the podcast format. Well, besides a list of other problems.

    • @Ionizerions
      @Ionizerions 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He does not know EMF. Or anything about Radiation. At all. It's just me who knows this topic intimately unfortunately.
      Out of 8 billion humans, it's just me.

  • @prdeacon974
    @prdeacon974 5 ปีที่แล้ว +194

    These reporters are just like the 70/80s ones saying “cigarettes don’t cause cancer.”

    • @TruthIsKey369
      @TruthIsKey369 5 ปีที่แล้ว +25

      Don't forget the doctors who said smoking was healthy in the 50's.

    • @lacedhayes887
      @lacedhayes887 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Exactly🤦‍♂️. Now we have 5g... RIP

    • @rosenieves3011
      @rosenieves3011 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Tobacco is not bad indians and other cultures used it for healing . Its the chemicals they put in the cigs that make them bad . They want to do away with them now becouse smokers cough out the nano dust . Arisol assault from chem spraying .

    • @ZengaGuitar
      @ZengaGuitar 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      We have cellphones for decades and there is no increase in cancer related deaths

    • @MalcomMalediction
      @MalcomMalediction 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@ZengaGuitar um u gonna trust the medical mafia and government officials? ok sheeple

  • @cre8veheart
    @cre8veheart 5 ปีที่แล้ว +95

    Right:::the slow kill is what they want
    God forbid we protect ourselves

    • @Finn.McGuinness
      @Finn.McGuinness 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Leslie Katzenmeier what?..

    • @Степанов-й8р
      @Степанов-й8р 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Finn.McGuinness WHAT wut? in tha...

    • @derpymcderpello5381
      @derpymcderpello5381 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Nobody is slowly dying to 5G. Non-ionizing radiation can't harm anybody. Visible light is about a thousand times stronger than 5G.

  • @jvb654
    @jvb654 5 ปีที่แล้ว +64

    Why is the FCC deciding what’s good or not for our health???

  • @Brucev7
    @Brucev7 4 ปีที่แล้ว +59

    So, Cell Phone Shields do work, if used properly, and, Cell Towers are a real threat.

    • @smoke598
      @smoke598 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      There’s no escaping it, radiation is everywhere. It honestly sounds like a scam to me.

    • @johnmadden52
      @johnmadden52 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No dumbass

    • @smoke598
      @smoke598 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      pumpkin boi Great reply 🤦‍♂️

    • @dankrigby5621
      @dankrigby5621 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@smoke598 radiation was always everywhere. everything emits an EMF. Only certain frequencies and amplitudes of EMF are harmful. Also Cell phone shields do not work at all, and if you wanted to be in an EMF-free environment youd have to walk around in a faradaic cage 24/7.

  • @smileychess
    @smileychess 2 ปีที่แล้ว +34

    I'm not paranoid, just aware of the facts. Because of this awareness, I keep my phone in airplane mode anytime it's in my pocket (unless expecting important call). And by the way, if you put your phone in Battery Saver mode, it makes far less frequent background checks, like for email, etc.

    • @KCLIBURN-mj9qx
      @KCLIBURN-mj9qx 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Dig a lot further into apps involving battery saver contol and you'll be surprised.........You will want to keep it off

    • @troloosauhund8747
      @troloosauhund8747 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The facts at the time state that nothing is happening.

  • @mohammadbataineh8215
    @mohammadbataineh8215 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The same confusing conclusion to the public keeps them in doubt.
    The fact is that Telecomunication companies don't want ppl to know the EMF threat.

    • @derpymcderpello5381
      @derpymcderpello5381 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is no EMF threat. Non-ionizing radiation doesn't harm anybody. The visible light we see is a thousand times stronger than 5G.

  • @Danielgvrcia
    @Danielgvrcia 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    This is great journalism, no bias just straight facts. They covered all the questions I had! Awesome video

    • @dragonspaw.blogspot4461
      @dragonspaw.blogspot4461 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      With the usual double talk from the FCC and other corporate interests; yes I realize I'm being redundant here.
      The 'safe limits' are lower in the EU for a reason and 'no evidence exists' was said about cigarettes when there was plenty. *"Question EVERYTHING" were very wise words!*

  • @kimberlyriddell8574
    @kimberlyriddell8574 4 ปีที่แล้ว +39

    Not only a tinfoil hat but now I need a body suit.

    • @booboobrown5634
      @booboobrown5634 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You need a new brain and set of eyes for a start

  • @privatear2001
    @privatear2001 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    "No current evidence..." means "we'll never test to see if there are harmful effects." The makers of these phones are just as big charlatans as those who provide the blocking technology because they've only tested under artificial lab conditions, as well. The model for how far emf radiation went into the head of an individual was an adult male marine, not a child with a head 1/4 the size, who uses these things regularly. The EMF radiation goes all the way through such a small head if the phone is held to the ear. An electrical engineer friend/instructor of mine once said: "I don't know about you but I wouldn't want something generating in the microwave range three inches from MY brain."

  • @JB-og8gn
    @JB-og8gn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I am impressed by how helpful this was...

  • @justinfinch2458
    @justinfinch2458 4 ปีที่แล้ว +42

    I was expecting them to not work at all, surprisingly they seemed pretty effective

    • @salgido
      @salgido 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      A clear quart crystal wrapped in copper wire will do the trick. As a necklace or in your pocket. It must be on your person.

    • @Word569
      @Word569 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      When the cover is completely covering a cell phone it can be effective, but how are you going to receive and make calls?

    • @ccaselli7
      @ccaselli7 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@salgidowhat trick exactly...does it neutralise radiation?

    • @salgido
      @salgido 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@ccaselli7 you know what.. I don't even know what I was talking about 😂😂. Sorry. A whole year ago. And I don't remember where I got that info

    • @urbanflowergreens
      @urbanflowergreens 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂​@@salgido

  • @TREYCEMONE
    @TREYCEMONE 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I wish they have would included those stickers that are often advertised.

  • @Ed_Mann
    @Ed_Mann ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The other trouble with garments is that they’re made of highly electro- conductive mesh but they’re not grounded. A pregnant woman wearing the garment shown is actually attracting more EF EMF to her and because the garments isn’t grounded, all of it passes through her. She’d be better off to just wear linen because linen will not attract radio waves or collect static electricity.

  • @luscent3737
    @luscent3737 5 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    The only thing that can block is a faraday shield or cage. But you can ground your self and also use items to not affect your energy as much. Grounding for instance helps to discharge all the positive ions that are caused by EMF devices. When you are not grounded you build up all these ions in the body to cause free radicals...then the body has to deal with it. But if you can somehow walk grounded either barefoot or grounding shoes...it can limit the effects of BAD EMF.

    • @JamieR
      @JamieR ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I thought we were grounded constantly. Only by wearing super thick heavy duty plastic based boots to not get grounded would we get cut off from the earths grounding effect. That's what I've read electricians and people who work with heavy duty electrical currents have stated on forums. Obviously I have 0 knowledge in this area, but paraphrasing their statements. I'd love to know if you or anyone else knew the truth :)

    • @doctoreden
      @doctoreden ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@JamieR There is a difference between an electrician that sometimes has to work with extreme high voltages and amperages which can turn an insulator like some shoes into a conductor. But for what he is talking about is simple positive ions in the air and negative ions from the ground. Wearing regular shoes will prevent you from discharging those positive ions and gaining negative ions from the earth. There are shoes and socks out there that are conductive so as to be able to discharge and also gain electrons from the earth. You can also make shoes conductive. There are videos out there that show you how to do this. But you must wear conductive socks or barefoot using the sandals or shoes....because if not then the socks become an insulator to prevent this. I walk barefoot in the dirt with the sun for like 20 minutes. This helps a lot.

  • @AlaskaWild
    @AlaskaWild ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This lady is nuts. Holding your phone away from your body doesn’t work as the RF frequencies are still going into your hands. Not to mention that it radiates up to feet away.

  • @itsme-gn2vg
    @itsme-gn2vg 5 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    Put your phone on airplane mode will help

    • @marlak4203
      @marlak4203 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Steve Sima I've been doing that everyday now

    • @amandamcmoney693
      @amandamcmoney693 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@marlak4203 I been doing this at night someone told me when I was younger that it charged better this way

    • @marlak4203
      @marlak4203 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@amandamcmoney693 Oh? Well thank you. Im going to try that then. Thanks for this tip.

  • @jhonprice3786
    @jhonprice3786 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Have you had symptoms such as fatigue, headaches, poor memory, difficulty sleeping, and lack of clarity in your thoughts? It may seem like these could be the results of daily stress and frenzy, but there could be another culprit. All of these are symptoms of electro-sensitivity, which is something that more and more people find themselves affected by. Studies conducted in 1997 found "less than a few cases (of electro-sensitivity) per million", however now as much as 2.5% of the population is affected by electro-sensitivity. Even with the most moderate calculations, electrosensitivity is 10,000 times more common today than it was 20 years ago. Why could this be?
    Electro-sensitivity and its symptoms appear to be triggered by certain microwave frequencies of electromagnetic radiation. Due to their high frequency, microwaves allow for higher transmission rates and smaller antenna sizes, which is perfect for high-tech devices that are constantly getting smaller and faster. These are devices such as cell phones, tablets, laptops, and any device that can connect to Wi-Fi, which can now include TVs and refrigerators

    • @nirv
      @nirv 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's people's misunderstanding of science and technology, yet they rely so much on it. Prescription for disaster as Carl Sagan said.

    • @creampielover69
      @creampielover69 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      You sound like Chuck from Breaking Bad and trust me, this is not a compliment.

  • @tacpreppers4906
    @tacpreppers4906 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    of course there's "no evidence" according to the FCC... i mean come on

    • @ThriveWithLouise
      @ThriveWithLouise 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      lol exactly. criminals.

    • @frankhassell6066
      @frankhassell6066 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Oh that little extra charge it's only because I added a substance to your paint to help the durability it'll last much longer oh I don't know there's no scientific evidence that it will cause a illness
      BECAUSE NO SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH HAS BEEN DONE

    • @captainhellhound7451
      @captainhellhound7451 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      TacPreppers you know people have been claiming all new technology was causing issues. Same when 4g came, 3g, 2g, and the beginning of phones

    • @RMHonkane
      @RMHonkane 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      TacPreppers the FCC does not have evidence but you do? Smells like Bullshiiit

  • @foskr4
    @foskr4 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Smart meters are also very high in EMF and unfortunately my neighbour has one :( and lots of ppl are encouraged to get one

    • @anntelling7603
      @anntelling7603 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      and some cities mandate the smart meters.

    • @acedia4453
      @acedia4453 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@anntelling7603 Just make sure they arent behind a bedroom.

    • @hamishanderson6738
      @hamishanderson6738 ปีที่แล้ว

      Blushield is excellent tech.

  • @eulerbill
    @eulerbill 4 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    THANKS. How about any test on EMF pendant protection like QLINK? I wanna see an emf EXPERT LIKE YOUR EXPERT TEST QLINK or whatever pendant is best so i BUY

  • @pritty91
    @pritty91 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    So it still works ? Like that pad they put on you before getting X-rays

  • @bee7549
    @bee7549 4 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    The bottom line is IT REDUCES EXPOSURE!!! Of course the FCC would note that, they have vested interests.
    A reduction is a WIN

  • @llary
    @llary 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    The lack of scientific understanding in this piece and the comments below is just astounding and frightening.

    • @adamdownes4725
      @adamdownes4725 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      So what is your informed advice on protection then?

    • @alphanflking31
      @alphanflking31 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ok dummy how does one protect himself from WIFI, Cell phone radiation, etc?

    • @lapatkasentivkas1161
      @lapatkasentivkas1161 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@alphanflking31 Easy, wire everything up and turn off all wifi in router, get wires to wired to router to your phone if you prefer using phone a lot. do a little research. wired will affect you zero.

    • @alphanflking31
      @alphanflking31 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lapatkasentivkas1161 Am aware of this....ethernet is good....wireless isn't!

    • @dankrigby5621
      @dankrigby5621 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@adamdownes4725 the devices are tested to only emit EMF in amplitudes and frequencies that arent harmful. Also Cell-Phone EMF protectors are a scam.

  • @ShaunVillafana
    @ShaunVillafana ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for doing this, please keep doing more

  • @KlutchGawd
    @KlutchGawd 5 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    hahaha this piece is ironic af. Calling out the problem to the attempted solution instead of calling out the source of the problem itself. haha

    • @bucketheadkfc
      @bucketheadkfc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      There are no problems here, cellphones have no negative effects on humans.

    • @joam8300
      @joam8300 5 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      @@bucketheadkfc No negative effects? Please. Do some research.

    • @bucketheadkfc
      @bucketheadkfc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@joam8300 Please point me in the right direction.

    • @waterstoneweddingfilms1188
      @waterstoneweddingfilms1188 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      @@bucketheadkfc Navy Radiowave Brief AD750271 Project MF12.525.015-0004B
      Naval Medical Research Institute
      National Naval Medical Center
      Bethesda, Maryland 20014, U.S.A.
      Effects include;
      Psychological Disorders ("Human Behavioral Studies") - the so-called
      "Psychophysiologic (and Psychosomatic) Responses"
      I. Neurasthenia- (general "bad" feeling)
      2. Depression
      3. Impotence
      4. Anxiety
      5. Lack of Concentration
      6. Hypochondria
      7. Dizziness
      8. Hallucinations
      9. Sleepiness
      10. Insomnia
      II. Increased Irritability
      12. Decreased Appetite
      13. Loss of Memory
      14. Scalp Sensations
      15. Increased Fatigability
      16. Chest Pain
      17. Tremor of the lianas
      Behavioral Changer
      Blood Disorders
      Vascular Disorders
      Peripheral Nervous System Effects
      Autonomic Nervous System Effects
      Central Nervous System Effects
      Heating of Organs
      And the list keeps going.

    • @bucketheadkfc
      @bucketheadkfc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@waterstoneweddingfilms1188 Using a cellphone is not the same as being on a naval ship being exposed to huge doses of Microwaves and radio waves. You should watch a video called "Do cell phones cook your brain?" by Potholer54, it's interesting.

  • @kengartner204
    @kengartner204 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The BlocBag (made from SwissSHield conductive fabrics, can be purchased from LESSEMF) zips around the whole body and we measure almost more than 99% reduction in RF fields. Our EHS person has three nested layers when she travels by car and we see better than 99.99% reduction (-40DB) measured with Safe-and-Sound Pro II meter.

    • @lukekonopka1344
      @lukekonopka1344 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Prove it

    • @kengartner204
      @kengartner204 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@lukekonopka1344 That is a fair question, because many vendors make bold claims about their product's effectiveness. In our case, for the testing we have two SSPro meters, one will be inside the three layers of protection (next to the skin of the EHS person, generally in the lap where the most protection exists, not at the face where there is lighter protection due to breathing mesh) and one will remain exterior to the BlocBag, approximately one inch above the nested SSPro. The MAX reset is done on both at the start of the trip and the MAX value is read at the end of the trip.
      Routinely we will see more than a factor of 1000 difference (30dB), such as the exterior one will show a value of ~2500 microwatts/m^2 and the interior with show a value less than 2.5 microwatts. We have seen a larger difference of up to a factor of 10,000 difference when we employ a fourth layer (of SwissShield Naturell). Even so, this protection is selective of frequencies and if the Amazon delivery van passes, the interior number will spike and the EHS person will have tinnitus fifteen minutes hence.
      In summary there are two BlocBags (one medium nested inside the large, the EHS person has body swaddled in the pink Soft-and-Safe bamboo/silver fabric and there can be a layer of SwissShield Naturell draped outside this.
      Of course, this test was looking for the 'best case' of protection and the 'worst case' of the protection is near the face at the zipper and is less than 30dB. The bottom line is that our EHS person reacts negatively when exposed to more than 10 microwatts/m^2 and I can drive a full 30 minutes and stay well below that level inside these multiple layers. One can fairly ask whether have more than $1000 of protective materials is 'worth it' and, in our case, it is the only way our EHS person can leave the property without injury.
      No further proof is offered. YMMV.

    • @Word569
      @Word569 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It cannot adequately protect the head to allow a person to obtain oxygen and expel CO2.

    • @kengartner204
      @kengartner204 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Word569 The mesh on the blocbag employs SwissShield 'Daylite' which is adequate for breathing without hypoxia., The section with the breathing window is about two feet high and the width of the bag. The purported RF blocking of this area is closer to 20db (a factor of 100) rather than the rest of the bag, which blocks more RF than that. It is a tradeoff. There are many people who sleep zipped up in these things overnight when traveling. What constitutes 'adequate' protection will vary depending on the exposure. It is not a panacea for people who live in over-exposed environments; shielding is a stopgap measure and relocation to a different place might be required in such cases.

  • @kb8729
    @kb8729 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    5G kills.

    • @derpymcderpello5381
      @derpymcderpello5381 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      No it doesn't. Not unless you could feel your skin burning from EMF radiation.

  • @farrjarr
    @farrjarr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Try the iPhone.. it's active constantly.. even when turned off.
    It's a killer phone.

    • @v2pg
      @v2pg หลายเดือนก่อน

      yes bro It really is, android is better I needa get an android again

  • @funkentelechy_0
    @funkentelechy_0 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Wrap your phone in aluminum foil when not in use. Cheap/effective

    • @mj9949
      @mj9949 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Funkentelechy That does work

  • @1AnunnakiJedi
    @1AnunnakiJedi 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    RF are radio frequencies what you need shielding from is EMF electro-magnetic frequencies. Look into Orgone.

    • @curtiswright4809
      @curtiswright4809 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Try copper mesh screen. Reich has basically said those orgonite chunks will turn into DEAD ORGONE around dead orgone energy. His accumulator boxes needed to be used in the country EVEN BACK THEN!!! circa 1950's. I was into Ogone back in '08 and gave it a chance but its like a fart in a hurricane or wishful thinking. Can be harmful if not only noneffective.

    • @1AnunnakiJedi
      @1AnunnakiJedi 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dead Orgone 😂 replied.

    • @dankrigby5621
      @dankrigby5621 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      EMF stands for electromagnetic field. RF are a certain range of frequencies. All RF are EMF, but not all EMF frequencies are called RF. (There are other names for frequency ranges too like HF, UHF, etc)

  • @accountingdepartment9709
    @accountingdepartment9709 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I don't think so! I just saw an experiment from techwellness and they show this reporter didn't do a through job--you tested the center and not round the phone

  • @SN-ty2rg
    @SN-ty2rg ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I didn't hear anything that can help with radiation and frequencies protection for anyone health and well-being.

  • @MalcomMalediction
    @MalcomMalediction 4 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    now we have 5G Coronavirus

    • @johnmadden52
      @johnmadden52 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Litteraly do some research dumbass

  • @rerite2
    @rerite2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Did good old ATT landline phones back in the day emit radiation?

  • @Keepthemlistening
    @Keepthemlistening ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When you do the experiments it shows how a certain frequency of radio waves do effect the cells causing mutation. The only thing that effects the cells that way are radio waves

  • @sarahbiddle4915
    @sarahbiddle4915 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Imagine what the 5g tower does then

  • @royfinegan8006
    @royfinegan8006 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Man bunch of y'all really don't know how wireless transmission works and it shows

  • @echandler673
    @echandler673 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    What if I used the nursing cover close to the router to get it to block me sitting close to it?

  • @soniashapiro4827
    @soniashapiro4827 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This is fairly even-handed. Good job.

  • @Zanew2000
    @Zanew2000 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    So does the double emission from the case apply to the emf blocking clothing as well? Can your shirt be interfering with rf potentially getting trapped within the shirt? Since it does mirror itself like a phone

    • @markbalogh9655
      @markbalogh9655 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      This is a really good question

    • @Zanew2000
      @Zanew2000 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@markbalogh9655 right... this could be so harmful

    • @KkjRivers
      @KkjRivers 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes the clothes will make you worse

  • @lemonlimelukey
    @lemonlimelukey 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    its a fact that both radiation is damaging and dangerous and that most of these products if not all are completely inadequate for proper protection.

    • @WizardofGOP
      @WizardofGOP 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@soundspark look up one component in almost every vex-ine, polysorbate 80 and tell me if you think that is a great idea or not. That is just one of the hundreds, if not thousands, of bad ideas that go into each vial. Yes, I would trust a healthy immune system over a vex-ine any day of the week.

    • @WizardofGOP
      @WizardofGOP 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@soundspark Do you have anything meaningful to actually say? Or just ridiculous rhetoric and insults?
      I produced just one fact on just one actual component of vex-ines and could go on to write a book here in the comments about it. When do you produce anything factual and of value that could actually add something to the conversation?
      Saying vex-ines are safe and that it is a good idea that you should treat a healthy body based on nothing but your delusions and irrational prejudice towards someone that does not conform to your hap-hazard way of thinking seems to be a ridiculous and risky way to live your life.

    • @WizardofGOP
      @WizardofGOP 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@soundspark Wow, is that all you have? What misinformation did I post exactly? Look, buddy, you are just one of those lying, narcissists. You all have such conformity of thought that it seems like you are all the same person. Always the same tactics of rhetoric, lies and insults. Ridiculous.

    • @derpymcderpello5381
      @derpymcderpello5381 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Only ionizing radiation is damaging and potentially dangerous in high levels. Non-ionizing radiation can't do shit unless you felt your skin burning from the EMF radiation which it legally can't.

  • @godgivennutrition2263
    @godgivennutrition2263 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    First of all at 2:26 the reporter mentions the manufacturers say...Then at the end say the had they didn't respond to their request for comment? When she says there is no scientific link to cancer, I'd like to know why is it then that World Health Organization lists mobile phone use as a "carcinogenic hazard"? I'd say explore if you really want to hear about the studies "The truth about mobile phone and wireless radiation" -- Dr Devra Davis

    • @derpymcderpello5381
      @derpymcderpello5381 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      WHO stated that EMF radiation is "possibly carcinogenic" to humans. The only way it is carcinogenic is if the EMF radiation was literally burning your skin, and you would definitely feel that if it was. Legally, EMF radiation can't do that and your phone doesn't have enough power to produce that much EMF radiation.

  • @kayeworsham6268
    @kayeworsham6268 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Why aren't electronics companies protecting their consumers? Exactly!

  • @truthseeker8698
    @truthseeker8698 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    The FCC says there is no link? That is not what the WHO reported to the world back in 2011 when they classified electromagnetic energy fields as possibly carcinogenic. Why wasn't that included in the report?

    • @vaL-kv6uy
      @vaL-kv6uy 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Because the FCC does NOT care about people's health.

  • @spookmore
    @spookmore 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The last words the women spoke where lies.

    • @brian7android985
      @brian7android985 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No she didn't. She truthfully stated what the FCC said. ...now, whether the FCC lied is another story

    • @ULTIMATEPATCHES
      @ULTIMATEPATCHES 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Pathetic the "great" FCC obfuscates the facts of cell tower health hazards to the public.@@brian7android985

  • @turbonbc
    @turbonbc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Faraday bag will neutralize everything.

    • @SlickCat
      @SlickCat 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah even the phone signal, so you cant receive or send calls.

    • @turbonbc
      @turbonbc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@SlickCat who cares? if ur not using it or when you go to sleep throw it in? You care more about calls than health?

    • @JaakkoJohannes
      @JaakkoJohannes 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes, but it also blocks the good healing frequencies of the earth. We need these frequencies to stay healthy and to stay alive. You can fix this problem by using a Grounding pillow case or some other sort of grounding mechanism along with the bag.

    • @turbonbc
      @turbonbc 5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      @@JaakkoJohannes Yes well you don't faraday bag your whole house, just the phone. Grounding mats and pads are helpful yes i use them but i also hear that metal amplifies 5g and EMF radiation. Walking barefoot, grounding/earthing daily helps a lot.

    • @JaakkoJohannes
      @JaakkoJohannes 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@turbonbc oh my bad. I thought you were speaking about one of those bags you sleep in. Sorry. Yes metal amplifies it thats why i wouldnt use aluminum sheets etc. Because if placed wrong you might do harm. But metal net and mesh with spaces in between does not amplify, it neutralizes. You can ground your self by putting your feet on a sheet of aluminum, but be careful because it reflects the energy and amplifies it back in the
      The direction its coming from, so i would use some other method. Aluminum sheets can be used if connected to a grounding cable.

  • @katialeitao2004
    @katialeitao2004 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Conclusion: “The best way to refuce RF is to increase (mobile phone) distance and decrease your use.
    Text instead of talk. Loud speaker over wired handset but wired handset over bluetooth, and keep your phone on airplane mode as often as you can.”

  • @lasonn4127
    @lasonn4127 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why doesn't the 'advice' include using those products as directed --- because they do block 80-90% of emf, which is significant (and higher than chemo for cancer, or flu vax for the flu) --- but not to expect it to be effective in all places at all times in the same way? Or to buy an emf meter to see where the product works best? Shows that no one cares about emf toxicity, except those who are at least trying to help people -- those who make the products.

  • @carolsun5785
    @carolsun5785 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have a headache when I use cell phone too long. I must force myself to use it less and turn it off when I am not using it. Radiation is real thing and harmful!

    • @katkit4281
      @katkit4281 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      😂 when science illiterates leave a comment.

  • @darwinsbestbuddies8055
    @darwinsbestbuddies8055 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    “The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in “advanced” countries, but they have destabilized society, have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human beings to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world, it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical suffering even in “advanced” countries.”- Ted Kaczynski (The unabomber)

  • @dogtime8168
    @dogtime8168 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So which product do I buy for my phone

    • @WizardofGOP
      @WizardofGOP 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      A garbage can, or electronics recycling facility would be best. Try a USB/ethernet adapter and plug in. However, any electronic device will hurt you just by holding it you will feel the joint pain it causes.

  • @HackYourHealth
    @HackYourHealth 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I want to know about the stickers! Good to know about them needing to be facing the right direction tho.

    • @marlak4203
      @marlak4203 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I'm just so happy many/most of these products work😃

  • @RealityTrailers
    @RealityTrailers 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    If you live within 5-10 miles from any cell phone tower then you should be more worried about that than your little brain and balls or ovaries tumor (among other diseases) causing cell phones.

  • @Galdring
    @Galdring ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Okay, so... say you have a phone case with a shield that covers just the front of the phone, and you keep the back directed away from you. You also don't use the phone with the EMF shield flipped back to the back of the phone, so you avoid radiation that would have escaped from the back of the phone being reflected toward you... Will the case reduce exposure? Or are there also other circumstances under which the phone case will actually increase exposure?

  • @lamartruth6601
    @lamartruth6601 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So basically the products work

  • @androgynousnature
    @androgynousnature 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    the waves are bouncing off the back of the cell phone case straight to your face my g. dope but still gotta to my own result 1:44 lol love and light

  • @barbaragee3085
    @barbaragee3085 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Excellent information. Thank you!

  • @josephdupont
    @josephdupont 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    very useful.. but ask a governmental agency about cancer is usless unless the are helping another company get a marketing adevantage.

  • @Saundersstrong
    @Saundersstrong 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Potentially harmful? All those who question this might want to read The Invisible Rainbow

  • @akbarshoed
    @akbarshoed 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    This is a GOOD news station!!

  • @Frequentlytryingtostayflying
    @Frequentlytryingtostayflying ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Anybody else even notice the random camera shots of the ladies feet as she walks out the door and up the stairs? Lol. The camera man must've had a foot feti$h

  • @kudezamiah8125
    @kudezamiah8125 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about emf stickers?

  • @CristinaTeixeiraTV
    @CristinaTeixeiraTV ปีที่แล้ว

    Very good . Thanks

  • @jedipdx0
    @jedipdx0 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    lies. there's plenty of scientific evidence.

  • @strangefilm157
    @strangefilm157 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The best way to get rid of rf issues is NOT to alter the paradigm such as prism or beam teathers etc?

  • @CompostOracle
    @CompostOracle 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    did they just test faraday fabric and not magnets that emit a field/protected zone? or magnetic conductors? this was only a faraday cage test not an energy field entrainment test. Tesla and Faraday had different solutions to combating negative energy fields and diverting/transforming/blocking specific energy bandwidths. This was not a full nor fair test.

  • @alans4464
    @alans4464 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    REPORTER You really need to be more clear about how those cases work. I think if you had asked the expert-he would have reminded you that THERE IS RADIATION COMING FROM ALL SIDES OF THE PHONE. SO BLOCKING JUST THE FRONT OF THE CASE DOESN'T DO MUCH GOOD AT ALL!!!

    • @jared4575
      @jared4575 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Radiation does not transfer energy like sound. Radiation is a form of energy transfer that moves light waves from one place to another. They go in a straight line, they can’t curve around things. I learned this in I think both 7th and 9th grade. Think of it as a shield, it only blocks radiation if it’s between you and the source

  • @SuperKillifish
    @SuperKillifish 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    so where do you purchase these products?

  • @bryanwilliamson8439
    @bryanwilliamson8439 4 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I came across this video because I’m noticing that every time I’m near WiFi it feels like swords are flying through my heart I’ve tested this very well does anyone have any suggestions on how to protect myself from this stuff I have to use WiFi for my job.. god bless you all

    • @Cyclesofhealingsouls
      @Cyclesofhealingsouls 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      try to help your body regenerate with good natural supplement providing vitamins antioxydant ike C, B, E, Garden of life has brand extracted from food. It will speed up your recovery. Try earthing to discharge the ionization received through the wifi and cellphone. wear stone, crystal to absorb these nasty radiation, but remember to ground/earth these stones regularly so they can discharge the wifi energy they absorbed. (earthing dot com has earthing mat, sheets for the night you can use, later you can put your stones on it for the same grounding effects) - maybe wear a stone pendant like malachite over your heart (ground it everyday after work). Take care

    • @daleval2182
      @daleval2182 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Buy the RF shield shirt Amazon

    • @bryanwilliamson8439
      @bryanwilliamson8439 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Cyclesofhealingsouls thank you so much I wasn’t alerted of this response very helpful information I will let you know once I implement!

    • @bryanwilliamson8439
      @bryanwilliamson8439 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dale Val I have been considering this I need to order one already thank you!

    • @Cyclesofhealingsouls
      @Cyclesofhealingsouls 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @bitchute youtube Hi, I have found that stones depends of the person. Most people are talking about Black tourmaline and Shungite. I haven't tried them yet, I will in the future, what I have tried is clear Quartz crystal, Malachite, Amethyst, Lapis, Jade, Gold, Silver. Some stones of pure metal will absorb harmful radiation, while others will reinforce your aura and or your physical body. Himalayan salt lamps are also very useful inside one's home and near the bed. Though the level of EMF, EF, RF keep increasing which means one has to be attentive to help these stones or pure metal to be grounded regularly or exposed to the sun on a regular basis. All those are useful, though the most useful for me has been boosting my diet + daily earthing to discharge the ionization, then things start to be easier to deal with. I have no choice but to be exposed to a regular quantity of exposure due to my work and have found all of the above helpful in diminishing and coping with these energies. Hope this help.

  • @lumcheeleong444
    @lumcheeleong444 19 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I think it's won't harm you without many of them.

  • @mrxmry3264
    @mrxmry3264 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    rf-blocking cellphone cases? using one of them will disable the phone, and then whats the point of having a phone? SMH. 90% reduction means that the phone has to boost transmitter power to maximum, which will kill the battery FAST.

  • @juandilasagofficial
    @juandilasagofficial 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That is the use of cellphone to receive signal and emmit signal don't block it ....dude

  • @nickp3482
    @nickp3482 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've tested orgonite pyramids and they really do great job, i found some at spiritualised,us

  • @Niels357
    @Niels357 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    See the tinfoil hat guy wasn't crazy

  • @OTT-JV
    @OTT-JV 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’ll save you guys time…
    They don’t work!

  • @jiheemvohor9720
    @jiheemvohor9720 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    But, there's new demonstrations showing that bluetooth admits less radiation than wires now

  • @worthington5687
    @worthington5687 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I like how the 20th Century experienced the highest population growth in all human history concurrent with the invention/development/proliferation of wireless.

    • @bryanwalton6200
      @bryanwalton6200 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      no not really. the boom was way before the wireless. actually we are experincing more deaths, cancers, sensitivities, etc

  • @billyclinton9150
    @billyclinton9150 4 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Yet why are they legal if you get radiation from them

  • @nicholasshaw8078
    @nicholasshaw8078 17 วันที่ผ่านมา

    What about emf proof jewelry!????

  • @johndegregs1777
    @johndegregs1777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Shungite is best one in my opinion not sure if it’s here and going to watch it just had to comment this about Shungite

  • @stephenwrabko4441
    @stephenwrabko4441 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there such a thing as a RF siphon

  • @sammamishq7688
    @sammamishq7688 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    it isn't potentially, it is proven.

  • @seavil1
    @seavil1 ปีที่แล้ว

    silver and lead paint can block it but make your own

  • @urbanwarior3134
    @urbanwarior3134 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Notice they dontt show any figure because then you could compare to guidelines

  • @DMX-PAT
    @DMX-PAT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First off no-one is going to leave there cell phone in airplane mode, it will not ring or vibrate when you receive call so that's pointless even for people who are anti-radiation. The info in this video is not specific enough as well, allow me to explain. First of all there is very little radiation that comes off a cell phone even when you make a call compared to when you have the wifi enabled and you are fully connected to the nearest modem. This is key!! If you simply keep your phone on cellular and turn the wifi off, you will greatly reduce the amount of radiation it generates. Especially when most many people think the source of the most intense radiation comes from the modem and not a cellphone/tablet, hence the modem blocker cages and cellphone cover-cases. Turn off your wifi in settings, a cell phone has insanely high radiation just being connected to wifi, so this video is way off. The video depicts calls being made like they are what is dangerous, but his is very much incorrect. Providing you are using speaker, which I assume anyone with any common sense does anyway. Cellular is also fine for sending and receiving text messages, yes it works just fine with wifi turned off. Lastly, the military classifies cellphones as a weapon and yet we give these things to our children and even leave them connected all night while only feet away, well within the extreme radiation distance limits.

    • @DMX-PAT
      @DMX-PAT 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @Empress You just blew my mind!!

  • @user-AllenE
    @user-AllenE 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video is 4 yrs old newer and better technology has arisen!

  • @Brucev7
    @Brucev7 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Stickers were not tested

  • @bandobando1558
    @bandobando1558 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    this sounds strange but put your phone into airplane mode ✈️.
    i immediately notice an intensity drop. and feel super relaxed 😳
    this radiation is real

  • @jasonlambert154
    @jasonlambert154 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I'm throwing away my phonecase now

  • @facial210
    @facial210 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    No crystals tested?

    • @clioaspinade9275
      @clioaspinade9275 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They didn't test magic beans either, disgraceful.

  • @aperson1181
    @aperson1181 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    She is not right with the concluding comments. I have Safe and Sound Pro II from Safe Living Technologies. Just came from the Cell phone storeS. Yes, went to test VZ, T and TMUS. The distance...the speaker would not be too helpful. I measured up to 10 ft away over 1,000,000 uw/m2. Just to give you a comparison, my 3G (being discontinued this year) with VZ has 10,000 uw/m2. You see the drastic difference. 4G makes...Just wait until 5G...... It is showing up in Oregon.

  • @jimgagne3801
    @jimgagne3801 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm going back to 1980

  • @morpheasbell6214
    @morpheasbell6214 ปีที่แล้ว

    blushield is the only one that works properly.

  • @marlak4203
    @marlak4203 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Can an in air purifier help against these waves too?

    • @wilcoxtactical3716
      @wilcoxtactical3716 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      No, but thoughts and prayers will.

    • @marlak4203
      @marlak4203 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@wilcoxtactical3716 hehe. Very true tho

    • @Minasti_7
      @Minasti_7 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      No as much as I remember. In the tests I saw, Air purifiers emit lot of EMF

    • @scialyticsteve
      @scialyticsteve 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      If you're stupid enough you'll believe anything.

  • @1Hope4All
    @1Hope4All 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What about those stupid little stickers that you stick on your devices? I don't believe those work!