Thank you Netflix for this Armie Hammer content oh how We miss him!! Netflix please make a way for Armie hammer and Henry Cavill to make a sequel of the Man from uncle!! It’s such an underrated movie and we definitely need it!!
I like that he doesn't change the sound of his voice to try to sound like a woman when he is reading the characters dialogue. I wish audiobook narrators did this.
It is interesting to see that two DAMES have been playing the same role in different eras... Loved Dame Kristin Scott Thomas in Rebecca, loved also Dame Diane Riggs performing years ago the same role. Thank you for lecturing that classic. Best wishes.
Sigh... guess I need to read Rebecca. I've never read Daphne DuMaurier before. Thanks Netflix. A new reading adventure awaits. My library copy is now choked with holds because of this show. :)
Armie is too young for the role, Mr de Winter to be honest. He is supposed to be in late 40s / nearly 50 in the book. Nevertheless, I’m very curious how this adaptation will turn out.
I just finished reading the book. I'm pretty sure he was only 42, so not quite that old. Lots of men still look pretty good in their early 40s, and he was also supposed to be very handsome.
@@alicetran9824 Yes I think he was 42 but many times throughout the book, he was described as old enough to be her father, twice her age etc. I’m aware people tended to marry young in old times, but the writer mentions there’s an obvious age gap between them two many times. Armie is only 34 btw. I’m not saying I found it weird to see him as Maxim in the movie though, just pointing out a difference between the novel and the movie. There seems to be a lot of criticisms out there but I quite enjoyed it after all.
@@rosehepworth3365 I guess I took the author's mentions of their age difference more as a way to emphasize her lack of experience, rather than Maxim's looks. Either way, I also didn't think the movie was that bad! I quite liked Armie as Maxim, but I'll admit, mostly because he does look nicely paired with Lily James haha.
Well, Maxim was 42 in the book and the second Mrs de Winter was 21, so the man was literally twice the age of the wife. However, there is no actual reason story-wise or character-wise for there to be a similar age difference in a movie adaptation. And also, it's not like there's any need for yet another case of a guy in a movie being old enough to be the woman's father. Still, for anyone wanting to see that, they're both "the wrong age" (and close to each other's ages). If one requires the similar ages and the similar age difference there was in the book then the woman should also be of different age - much younger (a decade or so). Since the story doesn't require the couple to have a massive age difference and be of different generations, I'm glad that bit was changed. In the important aspects the new adaptation was very faithful to the book, actually. (Unlike the 1940 movie.)
If musicians followed similar logic we wouldn't have jazz. The same with painting - it would have ended centuries ago, because who in their right mind would want to try being a painter after Leonardo or Rafael?! I mean the amount of subjects was pretty limited - Bible or Greek and Roman myths. Should anyone become a writer? Every story in the world has been already written. Etc.
@@VeryStrict That's not particularly the logic I was following. The films already received harsh reviews to support what I was saying. You can remake a film if it wasn't done right in the first place. Artists are unique in their perspective and are celebrated for it, but if they're run of the mill, them remaking a masterpiece is futile.
@@usefamin Wheatley didn't remake a movie, he made a new movie adaptation of the novel. Great stories and literary works have been and will be adapted for stage and film again and again, regardless of what other versions there have been before. Anyone not interested can avoid them, but good stories deserve multiple interpretations, and we'd have less art if that didn't happen. Like... there were great filmed adaptations of Shakespeare's plays and Jane Austen's books decades ago, and so they shouldn't be filmed again? Why? Murnau's 1922 Dracula film (Nosferatu) was great, but why should it have been the only filmed version of the story? Sergio Leone's Fistful of Dollars used the story Kurosawa filmed before and Clint Eastwood even copied details from Toshiro Mifune's portrayal of the main character, but I don't think Leone was silly to touch the material. Not all (or any) versions of any story will be great, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't even exist, and opinions and tastes vary anyway. And decades and generations change... -- Though not the only other filmed adaption of Rebecca, I assume you must mean the 1940 movie - though I don't consider it a masterpiece myself; nice to look at as a movie, but watered down story-wise. That wasn't even anywhere near a faithful adaptation of the novel, so why should it be the definitive or only version? It changed a major plot-point, totally erased the crime and its effects and consequences on characters and events. The Production Code at the time didn't allow the story to be filmed as it was, and that alone would be a good enough reason for other adaptations. 80 years is a long time, too. New takes on this and other great stories make new people aware of the stories, and make some interested in other versions and original source material. Whether one likes a specific movie or not, on the whole we're better off having new adaptations and versions made rather than burying the stories after someone made one version.
@@tuuliamoors4134 I don't disagree with you that films and stories should be adapted, in fact I did mention that, especially if the director had a unique perspective. This version looks pretty, but it's oh so bland, which is insulting. Classics are a different story. Nosferatu was a silent German film and was made a hundred years ago, and while it's important historically, it's not the best. Remaking it would be ok until someone nails it. Which is what Hitchcock did with Rebecca. It won awards and was nominated for so many more, so while you don't consider it a masterpiece, I and others do. And even though I agree there should be new adaptations by actual artful directors, I think remakes have killed the creativity of the film and tv industry. Choose interesting films, badly done, like Plan 9 from Outer Space, that would be interesting. But remaking Gone with the Wind for instance. Why bother?
@@usefamin sorry but the argument about harsh reviews is moot. To me at least . Many works of art were subjected to bad/harsh/horrible/scathing reviews when first made. Think Impressionist paintings or Georges Bizet's opera Carmen. Writing a review on a piece of art is not an exact science like maths or physics and very much depends on a personal taste and mood of a writer.
I really wanted to like this movie, but it was so dull. It had no e of the suspense of the novel or even the Alfred Hitchcock original. Very disappointing.
Netflix is so brilliant to have their leading men READ from the books. WONDERFUL.
If Netflix just made a series of hot guys with sexy voices reading, I'd be cool with that.
Kinda funny how they also had Henry Cavill do this and now Armie Hammer considering they both worked in the man from U.N.C.L.E
Netflix should do us a favor and reunite these two actors 😋
Underrated movie
One of my favourite movies! ❤️
@@lamadridista7 perhaps a Man from U.N.C.L.E sequel?
He read the audiobook for call me by your name and I’ve never been so hot and bothered
Did he??
Mate, I'm drunk on that 🥵🥵🥵
I love hearing this man read. He could read the dictionary to me and I would say thank you.
th-cam.com/video/Iiqjp4B_thk/w-d-xo.html
The dictionary would not be enough...lol☺☺
He reads Call Me by your name on audible
❤
His voice is so smooth, refreshing and I would listen to him for hours and hours. 😍 Good job Netflix
If acting suddenly stops working out for Armie, a career voicing audiobooks is the way forward
Yes true. His voice is very relaxing though expressive enough and clear.
His voice just sounds like a fresh, warm cup of coffee. Does that make sense?
A million times yes
Absolutely.
Netflix. You guys already have both actors as friends
Pls pls do a Man from UNCLE sequel, they gays will give you a million streams
I SECOND THIS MOTION!!!!!😍😍😍😍😍
THIS WOULD BE A DREAM COME TRUE
Better yet, make Armie and Henry a yearning couple in the sequel as well.
not only the gays... :)
NETFLIX PLEASE!!! Although Armie has said that a sequel is being talked about seriously.
I'd listen to Armie reading the phone book. That voice... 🥰
What a lovely voice to listen to❤
What a talented manner of reading,so engaging,soothing.Sounds like a magic sound of classical music his voice is
Armie’s gaze while he read was the hottest thing ever
1:48 he quoted that part without reading the book 😍
I could literally listen to this all day
His voice..intoxicating..just metling chocolate on tip of fingers..loved the audio book call me by your name.
This is such a wonderful format, first Henry, now Armie. Actors reading, great content Netflix!
We need James McAvoy reading Atonement
yes!
Oh yeah, love that book and movie!
gosh... only this man makes me believe in romantic love and not just an evolutionary mechanism to perpetuate the species
Thank you Netflix for this Armie Hammer content oh how We miss him!! Netflix please make a way for Armie hammer and Henry Cavill to make a sequel of the Man from uncle!! It’s such an underrated movie and we definitely need it!!
Yes please
BRO FOUR MINUTES? I'M DYING ILY ARMIE
He has the most soothing voice 😌
I just love his voice!
I think I fell in love with Armie once again
So this is what it feels like to hear Armie read the audio book for CMBYN. Feels amazing
I’m so damn attracted to this man wow.
Same
be careful, he might eat you
You are not the only one
I hope Netflix do more interviews with Rebecca cast like they did with Enola Holmes
This is my favorite book ever... going to read it again now for the 270th time
Oh Armie.... you're a cover folder!!!! NAUGHTY.
I came to the comments looking for this.
I’m here for His voice
I could watch him read this book aloud for 12 hours straight.
i die every time he looks straight at the camera and quotes
I love Armie Hammer's voice...
I want him to actually read this for audible
We need Timmy and armie working tgt again 🥺
Alex Lo Yesssssss....
I like that he doesn't change the sound of his voice to try to sound like a woman when he is reading the characters dialogue. I wish audiobook narrators did this.
The people need a ASMRvideo by this man
Imagine beeing this beautiful.
If he would not be so amazingly goodlooking a carreer of him in audiobook-reading would be sufficient enough for me.
The only thing I can hear its Olivers voice...
Elio..Elio...Elio...Elio...
@@clauuu52 Oliver... I remember everything
@@anavrin5054 🥺🥺
Me too!!!!!! Xx
Armie is wonderful!
To be honest.. I really miss Armie so thank you Netflix for this content.
Why do you miss him? He has been in other movies
@@luminit7367 I know he's been in other movies. What I'm trying to say is like new interviews,etc. something like that.
I like Armie's reading. He should read more novels
Just watched it. Loved the twist! Should've been a Mini-Series. It kinda felt like 3 different stories/parts. Good job though!
This video shows why he did the audio for the audio book version of Call Me By Your Name.
this gave me a lot of cmbyn audiobook vibes
Love it!!Love Rebecca and now as I’m enchanted by the book.Enjoy the reading of this romance gem.Congratulation !!!👏🏻🎬📖
Armie is a gem I love him.
But I wish they got Lily to read the book for us she has a great voice.
My aunt gifted me this book in English when I was about 17. I love it so much!
It seems to me that i fall in love with his voice 🥰😆
YESSS FINALLY THIS MAN GETS SOME ATTENTION
He should do audiobooks😍
Yes, more than the one would be nice, I'd happily buy them, too.
Best gothic novel ever.
It is interesting to see that two DAMES have been playing the same role in different eras... Loved Dame Kristin Scott Thomas in Rebecca, loved also Dame Diane Riggs performing years ago the same role. Thank you for lecturing that classic. Best wishes.
prince charming voice
Bravo, Armie. Love you so much.❤️
This voice.....💗💗💗
My first book. My all time favourite book. In this man's voice. Amazing! 😍☺️
Oh c'mon Armie read the whole book in your sultry ASMR voice ❤️❤️❤️❤️
Holy shit, I’ve never been so mesmerised
1:02 is literally the whole reason behind the Unus Annus channel. I love that so much 😂😊 amazing writing and can't wait to watch the film!
I love when they do this!! I need to read this book before the movie Hehe.
i feel so blessed
Sigh... guess I need to read Rebecca. I've never read Daphne DuMaurier before. Thanks Netflix. A new reading adventure awaits. My library copy is now choked with holds because of this show. :)
It's a GREAT book! ❤
I love that book so much!
Read my cousin Rachel too.
Love it!!!
I love it ❤️
So good video❤ Love netflix movie of Rebecca❤❤ All in cast and crew have great amazing good work of Rebecca❤❤📷🌏💎😍😎💖❤💌💌
😌 ohh 😮 that voice 🥰
I remember reading this in 9th grade english class. I loved it.
He doesn't blink that much 😳
i love him so much
fix kalo rebecca dijadiin series pasti seru bgtttt
Thank you very much War Lord!!!!!!!! 😇😊
aaaaah! he folded the book! *cringe* why? oh, why armie?! what has the book ever done to you?
Omg.. He make me want to read the book again 😁
Same. I think I will. :)
I'm the target audience for this video
Just completed the movie! 👍🏾👍🏾 All characters!
Also! The enola holmes and this set (Mandalay home) are same!!
I don't care either this man or Charlie hunam should have been the batman . Maybe the next bond for sure .
I enjoyed the movie coz of armie
My favourite book 🥰🥰🥰
아미 목소리 넘 좋아. 책 다 읽어주면 안 되나요?
YES
If only.
Armie is too young for the role, Mr de Winter to be honest. He is supposed to be in late 40s / nearly 50 in the book. Nevertheless, I’m very curious how this adaptation will turn out.
and he was too old for the role in CMBYN, that character is a grad student, supposed to be in his very early 20s.
I just finished reading the book. I'm pretty sure he was only 42, so not quite that old. Lots of men still look pretty good in their early 40s, and he was also supposed to be very handsome.
@@alicetran9824 Yes I think he was 42 but many times throughout the book, he was described as old enough to be her father, twice her age etc. I’m aware people tended to marry young in old times, but the writer mentions there’s an obvious age gap between them two many times. Armie is only 34 btw. I’m not saying I found it weird to see him as Maxim in the movie though, just pointing out a difference between the novel and the movie. There seems to be a lot of criticisms out there but I quite enjoyed it after all.
@@rosehepworth3365 I guess I took the author's mentions of their age difference more as a way to emphasize her lack of experience, rather than Maxim's looks. Either way, I also didn't think the movie was that bad! I quite liked Armie as Maxim, but I'll admit, mostly because he does look nicely paired with Lily James haha.
Well, Maxim was 42 in the book and the second Mrs de Winter was 21, so the man was literally twice the age of the wife. However, there is no actual reason story-wise or character-wise for there to be a similar age difference in a movie adaptation. And also, it's not like there's any need for yet another case of a guy in a movie being old enough to be the woman's father. Still, for anyone wanting to see that, they're both "the wrong age" (and close to each other's ages). If one requires the similar ages and the similar age difference there was in the book then the woman should also be of different age - much younger (a decade or so). Since the story doesn't require the couple to have a massive age difference and be of different generations, I'm glad that bit was changed. In the important aspects the new adaptation was very faithful to the book, actually. (Unlike the 1940 movie.)
Just me that’s read the book over and over because I love du murier
Okay
Armie Hammer is great, but no self-respecting director would remake a film done by the best of the best director and actors
If musicians followed similar logic we wouldn't have jazz. The same with painting - it would have ended centuries ago, because who in their right mind would want to try being a painter after Leonardo or Rafael?! I mean the amount of subjects was pretty limited - Bible or Greek and Roman myths. Should anyone become a writer? Every story in the world has been already written. Etc.
@@VeryStrict That's not particularly the logic I was following. The films already received harsh reviews to support what I was saying. You can remake a film if it wasn't done right in the first place.
Artists are unique in their perspective and are celebrated for it, but if they're run of the mill, them remaking a masterpiece is futile.
@@usefamin Wheatley didn't remake a movie, he made a new movie adaptation of the novel. Great stories and literary works have been and will be adapted for stage and film again and again, regardless of what other versions there have been before. Anyone not interested can avoid them, but good stories deserve multiple interpretations, and we'd have less art if that didn't happen. Like... there were great filmed adaptations of Shakespeare's plays and Jane Austen's books decades ago, and so they shouldn't be filmed again? Why? Murnau's 1922 Dracula film (Nosferatu) was great, but why should it have been the only filmed version of the story? Sergio Leone's Fistful of Dollars used the story Kurosawa filmed before and Clint Eastwood even copied details from Toshiro Mifune's portrayal of the main character, but I don't think Leone was silly to touch the material. Not all (or any) versions of any story will be great, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't even exist, and opinions and tastes vary anyway. And decades and generations change... -- Though not the only other filmed adaption of Rebecca, I assume you must mean the 1940 movie - though I don't consider it a masterpiece myself; nice to look at as a movie, but watered down story-wise. That wasn't even anywhere near a faithful adaptation of the novel, so why should it be the definitive or only version? It changed a major plot-point, totally erased the crime and its effects and consequences on characters and events. The Production Code at the time didn't allow the story to be filmed as it was, and that alone would be a good enough reason for other adaptations. 80 years is a long time, too. New takes on this and other great stories make new people aware of the stories, and make some interested in other versions and original source material. Whether one likes a specific movie or not, on the whole we're better off having new adaptations and versions made rather than burying the stories after someone made one version.
@@tuuliamoors4134 I don't disagree with you that films and stories should be adapted, in fact I did mention that, especially if the director had a unique perspective. This version looks pretty, but it's oh so bland, which is insulting.
Classics are a different story. Nosferatu was a silent German film and was made a hundred years ago, and while it's important historically, it's not the best. Remaking it would be ok until someone nails it.
Which is what Hitchcock did with Rebecca. It won awards and was nominated for so many more, so while you don't consider it a masterpiece, I and others do.
And even though I agree there should be new adaptations by actual artful directors, I think remakes have killed the creativity of the film and tv industry. Choose interesting films, badly done, like Plan 9 from Outer Space, that would be interesting. But remaking Gone with the Wind for instance. Why bother?
@@usefamin sorry but the argument about harsh reviews is moot. To me at least . Many works of art were subjected to bad/harsh/horrible/scathing reviews when first made. Think Impressionist paintings or Georges Bizet's opera Carmen. Writing a review on a piece of art is not an exact science like maths or physics and very much depends on a personal taste and mood of a writer.
Where is the British accent though, lol?? It would fit with the movie and the British author. :)
I love his sexy voice🩷🍒🔥
Such a shame that the movie they did was painful.
Okay I really like him, but the way he was holding the book made me cringe😣
that's how sexy bitches hold books 😌
OMG, SAME!!!!! I hate seeing people bend/fold book covers 😫
@@Rai_S82 that's what I do when reading : )
@@valentinas.5630 Nooooo! 😭
Alternative title: Bedtime Stories with Cannibal
😱
Armiee cheaterrrr........., Damnnn felt good.
Hei
Second 😂
I am second
I’m first
I really wanted to like this movie, but it was so dull. It had no e of the suspense of the novel or even the Alfred Hitchcock original. Very disappointing.