Can art capture what happens when we dream? - Afterthoughts on Gregory Crewdson at SCI-Arc
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ส.ค. 2024
- A SCI-Arc Channel Clip Joint: SCI-Arc invites you to discuss the resulting trajectories uncovered when taking a closer look at a lecture by Gregory Crewdson. Was the lecture a casual presentation of his work, or could there be something amiss? Can we create architectural space from photography? Do photographers dream of being performance artists? Has art ever fully represented what happens in the dreamwork? Gathering commentary on the lecture from SCI-Arc faculty and guests after the fact, the video revives the oral tradition in a contemporary format as a bonafide mode for disseminating and evolving theory.
Watch the original lecture: • Gregory Crewdson: Trai...
Featuring:
Jeffrey Kipnis (Architecture and Art Theorist)
Matthew Au (SCI-Arc faculty)
Sean Lally (Associate professor, UIC)
Gregory Crewdson (Professor, Yale University)
Crew Credits -
Production:
Creator and Executive Producer - Hernan Diaz Alonso
Producer - Ryan Scavnicky
Writers - Ryan Scavnicky/Jeff Kipnis
Director - Reza Monahan
Director of Photography - Sean Morris
A Camera - Robert Moreno/Alex Zarth
B Camera - Heather Tarwick/Walker Sayen
Assistant Camera - Adriane Yi/Michel Erler
Lighting - Ruben Diaz
Sound Engineer - Scotty Tipton/George Wymega
Hair and Make Up Artist - Katrina Bell
Post-Production:
Story Producer - Ryan Scavnicky
Assistant Story Producer - Aja Zarrehparvar
Editor - Reza Monahan
VFX Supervisor - Alex Marfin
Sound Mixer - Christina Nguyen
Movie Clip: Shane
TM & © Paramount (1953)
Additional Images:
© Gregory Crewdson. Courtesy Gagosian.
©2019 SCI-Arc Channel
Wow. Crewdson's work has been of such interest to me for the past 10 years and yet I'm always learning about it's levels. Crewdson really is a genius.
This is such an informative analysis of his work. Would never have considered a fraction of this
InstaBlaster.
Such a damn good insight into this brilliant mind! Gives me chills to my core!
Crewdson is the best! He also looks like Jon Lovitz.
Excellent analysis.
thanks for this
Es la antítesis de la fotografía como forma de detener el tiempo. Todo este montaje necesario debería llamarse de otra forma. Recuerdo cierto fotógrafo que sacaba niños mocosos detrás de una verja, sin mencionar la pre producción hasta obtener la "instantánea".
this analysis overuses abstract concepts in parrallel, making cyclic statement with hypothesis from Freud and shovel it down your throat, well... it looses its meaning fast.
I found the first part of this video interesting, but I'm afraid it seemed to derail quite a bit near the end. How can you so fully embrace Freud without any disclaimers? He inspired an enormous amount of further research into psychology, and he is very quotable, yet most of his theories have been completely disproven at this point. To me it's a big red flag that you either didn't know that, or that you chose to ignore it. If you meant to draw upon his works as a means of creative interpretation then that's fine, but by not specifying this you're effectively using him for the ethos of his name. That's enough for me to question your authority on the matter.
This is not an explanation of whole Freud dream concept, but the possible interpretation of Crewdson' photos. Know the difference.
Nope.