To Clarify, The Fiqh and Aqeedah of our Sheikh Saad Al Shuraim is Hanbali, Athari. I saw people debating if hes hanafi or deobandi no hes not. Rather he is Hanbali and Athari and nothing more.
@tamkanatrazi1712 it's 1+1 =2, he lives in Saudi and their madhab is hanbali and it's very safe to assume that he is hanbali unlike that claim of hanafi and even if he is hanafi we atleast know he is on the path of the salaf and the correct aqeedah
@@Ibrahim.l20 Asalamu aleykum. When it is necessary, on the spot, when the moment arises, then do dawa to them, if you are sincere. This is what I think so far - and allah knows best. Asalamu aleykum
Imam Abu hanifa did mawlid s his PhD is abrogated. It's fraud trying too decive people about hanifa madahab ,when these lot do not follow our Sunni madahabs,they are psuedo salafi aka kwaraji
He say " the real religion will stay between the 2 ( Medina and makka) like tha snake stay in his house " and 100% of the oulama and the people are salaf there. He say about the saved group " those who follow me and my companion " and the only groupe who follow 100% the companion are salaf from between the 2. And he say " I am the best salaf for you" salaf mean the 1st generation of pious. Salaf is the only team who does not follow their desires but the quran and the sunnah.
@Syed Mohammad Sannan "You can't become the Salaf, Salaf are just the first 3 generations.Salafi is an extremist ghayr muqallid sect which is the root cause of most problems in this ummah. Moreover, my Aqa'id are Alhamdulillah correct so such pity deviations will not work on me Allah willing." where salaf clame to become the salaf? salaf is the name of a group who folllow them: surah at tawbah: 100 "The very first of the Emigrants and Helpers and those who followed them in good behavior, Allah is well pleased with them, and they are well pleased with Him. He has prepared for them Gardens under which rivers flow, and they will dwell therein forever. This is the great success!" and you said it yourself just after "Salafi is an extremist ghayr muqallid sect which is the root cause of most problems in this ummah. Moreover, my Aqa'id are Alhamdulillah correct so such pity deviations will not work on me Allah willing."
"Also, please show me your proof. Have you ever seen Shaykh Shuraim pray? he prays like a muqallid Hanbali not a Salafi. Secondly, he didn't even mention the Salafi movement in his response so you don't have a point here." ockay i will analysed how shuraim pray here: -firstly: he does'nt say bismillahi rahmani rahim loudly. mouslim: 399: Ja'far narrated from Shu'bah, who said: "I heard Qatâdah narrate, that Anas said: 'I prayed with the Messenger of Allah , and with Abü Bakr, 'Umar and 'UThmân,and I did not hear any of them reciting Bismillâhir Rahmânir-RahIm." so there is proof from kitab wa sunnah for that -secoundly: he place his right hand on his left even after the rukou' abu dawoud: 754. 'Abdullãh bin Az-Zubair said: "Lining up the feet, and placing one hand on the other, are from the Sunnah ." (Hasan) 755. AbU 'Uthmãn An-Nahdi narrated that from Ibn Mas'Ud, that he prayed with his left hand over his right, and the Prophet saw him, so he placed his right hand over his left. (Hasan) 759. It was reported from Sulaiman bin MUsã, from awous who said: "The Messenger of Allah used to place his right hand onhis left hand, then grasp both of them on his chest while he was praying." (sahih) ->the majority of scholar had said that it is for the standing when reciting fatiha and quran but ahmad rahimahoullah stated that the only precision here is that he (sws) placed his right on his left while standing and after ruku' your are standing so it based upon proof from kitab wa sunnah. and is not a muquallid thing. muquallid is to follow a thing even if proof from kitab wa sunnah contradict you. and sheikh shuraim are for from your accusation. -thirldy: he pose his knee before his hand: Abu Hurayrah said that the Prophet sws said, “If anyone of you were to make the prostration do not kneel like the kneeling of the camel but to place his two hands before his two knees." abu dawoud 840 (hasan by abu dawoud) mousnad ahmad volume 2 page 381 and other. first thing is that i dont think tha ahmad ibn hanbal has addopted this personaly because he mentiones this hadith as sahih in his mousnad. ->so it is another proof that he is not muquallid. fear allah in yours lies secoundly scholar had differ on his soundness because they see that the narrator who was'nt sure had say something contradictory : "Indeed we say this because this part o f the hadith conflicts with the first part of the hadith whereby it says, “Do not kneel like the kneeling of the camel.” Thus the prohibition regarding the resemblance of the camel in the characteristics of the sujud is, “Do not kneel like the kneeling.” We witness that the camel, when it is about to kneel, de scends with its front legs first before its two knees of the hind legs whereby the front part of its body descends before the back. And if you were to descend with your two hands first, the upper part of your body shall descend before your lower part, then you have resembled the kneeling of the camel." so by some this hadith is shadh (anomalous) Imam Ibn Qayyim said: 'Some of the narrators are not certain about some words of this Hadith since the first part of the Hadith contradicts the last part of the Hadith everyone knows that a camel places its hands before its knees'. so they said that the right thing that the prophet had said is'nt " but to place his two hands before his two knees." because it was inversed,so the right thing he sws said is “But to place his two knees before his two hands." and this complitely legit opinion it is strenghten with 2 hadith: abu dawoud 838. It was reported from from 'Asim bin Kulaib, from his father, from Wã'il bin Hujr, who said: "I saw that the Prophet when he prostrated, he would place his knees (on the ground) before his hands, and when he stood up, he would raise his hands before his knees." (Da'if isnad) and 839 It was reported from Hammam who said: "Muhammad bin Juhadah narrated to us from 'Abdul-Jabbãr bin Wã'il, from his father, that the Prophet would ... so he mentioned the Hadith of the Salãt (no. 838) and said: "So when he fell into prostration, his knees touched the ground before his palms did." (da'if isnad) Hammäm said: And Shaqiq :narrated to us (he said): " 'Asim bin Kulaib narrated to me from his father, from the Prophet with similar to this." And in the narration of one of them - and I am almost sure it was the narration of Muhammad bin Juhãdah - "And when he got up, he stood up on his knees, and took support from his thighs." da'if some strenghten those hadith because it is corroborating with the 1ste after and because of their number: 3 man report a thing (even if his inad is da'if) they can'nt invented exactly the same thing (hadith from the prophet)or it would be it is extremely unlucky. so there is'nt anything contradictory to sunnah here, there is no muquallid one more time because it is based upon their proof. and all the ommah are in consensus that you can do the 2. they just diverge on what is more liked. -forthly: notice that when he get up from the sujoud he does'nt raise his hand to the shoulder (or highter) just before al fatiha which has 0 proof and is a muquallid mouvements. beyound that know that normaly, it is upon you to take proof that shuraim is a muquallid. because it is an accusation so i wait for that yaa kadhaab one. surah nour: "11 Those who have come with slander are a group of you. Do not think that it is an evil for you, but rather, it is a good for you. To each of them what he has acquired as sin. The one of them who has taken the greatest share will have a great punishment. 12 Why, when you heard it [this slander], did not the believing men and women in themselves conjecture favorably, and say, "This is an obvious slander?" 13 Why have they not produced [in support of their accusations] four witnesses? If they produce no witnesses, then they are the liars in the sight of Allah." fear allah. "if anyone makes an untruthful accusation against a Muslim, he will be made by Allah to dwell in the corrupt fluid flowing from the inhabitants of Hell till he retracts his statement."Sunan Abi Dawud 3597. if you dont retract, know what will happen to you, and it will be 100% yours faults. fear Allah ya jahil one
U can't see where he mention Salaji manhaj because you are ignorant but all what he is saying is the manhaj of the salafus Salih...u Jahil who is saying he did not say about Salafi, then go and learn the correct Aqeeda which is the Aqeeda of the salafus Salih...
This speaker is out of fold of islam does not represent Islam.Ibn wahab was declared outside the fold of Islam Kaffir,apostate. He was not given a Muslim funeral, his body was burned, to stop his followers grave worship. Any one that defends ibn wahab is out of the fold of Islam . His decdendents hijacked makka and Medina and locked, killed true king and mufti that upheld ibn tamiya was not a sheikh and ibn wahab was out fold of Islam. They replaced themselves in 1925 and started changing history of Islam, destroying evidences, proclaim themselves as holy authority. Wahabism and ahemdiya are cults out of the fold of Islam, they are not even sects of Islam.
@@SaidB1n prophet Muhammad saw did not split tahweed into three bits , this is Bidda invitation. All work of ibn wahab is not a part of Islam. They are no different than ahemdiya , ibliss devil was best of angels we don't listen too ibliss devils etc.
@@Harbo1003 you Insinuating that not me. What these imams say is irrelevant and abrogated. They need correcting back true aqeeda that makes you true Sunni Muslims, they are following a deviant path,prophet Muhammad peace be upon has warned us about them. They dress like you, recite like you,but not word they recite will go down their necks, they are not from us , so correct them where ever you find them. This was fatwa advice of prophet Muhammad peace be upon him . We must do do just that salafi manaj is a modern kwaraji cult no different from ahemdiya cult. Cults are not a part of Islam. Learn the history of Islam ,history of wahabism and hijacking in 1925 of two of Islam most holiest places .
@@SaidB1n their tawheed is not the same tawheed taught to us by my Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him. Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him never spilt tahweed into different bits that is a Bidda of whabism innovators.
Love for Sheikh shuraim from KASHMIR valley ❤️💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓💓
May Allah bless and reward sheikh
Ameen ya RAAB
masha Allah sheikh saud ash shuraim hafizahullah
Ma sha Allah. Tabarak Allah
Masha Allah
Ma Sha Allah
Barak Allahu feek
ماشاءالله ربنا يحفظه
instablaster
جزاك اللة خير الجزاء ويرضى عليك شيخننا الفاضل وينفعنا من علمك ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤ احبك حب الخيرات
masha allah
To Clarify, The Fiqh and Aqeedah of our Sheikh Saad Al Shuraim is Hanbali, Athari. I saw people debating if hes hanafi or deobandi no hes not. Rather he is Hanbali and Athari and nothing more.
💯
On google it says he is Hanafi. What to believe now
@tamkanatrazi1712 it's 1+1 =2, he lives in Saudi and their madhab is hanbali and it's very safe to assume that he is hanbali unlike that claim of hanafi and even if he is hanafi we atleast know he is on the path of the salaf and the correct aqeedah
@@HaramainExperience Indeed. I was thinking the same thing. That in Saudi Arabia people are Hanbali so how come he is Hanafi. Just wanted to know
@tamkanatrazi1712 no worries, my dear brother
100% correct
The problem, is that what he said, shared, you gave it a label.
Don't call it salafi.
This is islam. That is all.
how will we differ from ahl al bida3 then
@@Ibrahim.l20 Asalamu aleykum. When it is necessary, on the spot, when the moment arises, then do dawa to them, if you are sincere.
This is what I think so far - and allah knows best.
Asalamu aleykum
Sheikh shuraim has Phd in Hanafi fiqh.
Imam Abu hanifa did mawlid s his PhD is abrogated. It's fraud trying too decive people about hanifa madahab ,when these lot do not follow our Sunni madahabs,they are psuedo salafi aka kwaraji
Sorry brother to disappoint you, but the Sheikh is on the hanbali madhab and the salafi aqeeda
who praised shuraim? baarak allahu feek
Where did he say anything about salafis ??????
dont spread hate coz allah will take you to task about every word you say
Abrar Ahmad he quoted the book of sheikh Muhammad ibn Abdul wahhab
@@sharmarke96 🐸🐸🐸
He say " the real religion will stay between the 2 ( Medina and makka) like tha snake stay in his house " and 100% of the oulama and the people are salaf there. He say about the saved group " those who follow me and my companion " and the only groupe who follow 100% the companion are salaf from between the 2. And he say " I am the best salaf for you" salaf mean the 1st generation of pious. Salaf is the only team who does not follow their desires but the quran and the sunnah.
@Syed Mohammad Sannanthen,if i show you that all the man between the 2 are salaf, will you accept it and become one?
@Syed Mohammad Sannan "You can't become the Salaf, Salaf are just the first 3 generations.Salafi is an extremist ghayr muqallid sect which is the root cause of most problems in this ummah. Moreover, my Aqa'id are Alhamdulillah correct so such pity deviations will not work on me Allah willing." where salaf clame to become the salaf? salaf is the name of a group who folllow them: surah at tawbah: 100 "The very first of the Emigrants and Helpers and those who followed them in good behavior, Allah is well pleased with them, and they are well pleased with Him. He has prepared for them Gardens under which rivers flow, and they will dwell therein forever. This is the great success!"
and you said it yourself just after
"Salafi is an extremist ghayr muqallid sect which is the root cause of most problems in this ummah. Moreover, my Aqa'id are Alhamdulillah correct so such pity deviations will not work on me Allah willing."
"Also, please show me your proof. Have you ever seen Shaykh Shuraim pray? he prays like a muqallid Hanbali not a Salafi. Secondly, he didn't even mention the Salafi movement in his response so you don't have a point here."
ockay i will analysed how shuraim pray here:
-firstly: he does'nt say bismillahi rahmani rahim loudly.
mouslim: 399: Ja'far narrated from Shu'bah, who said: "I heard Qatâdah narrate, that Anas said: 'I prayed with the Messenger of Allah , and with Abü Bakr, 'Umar and 'UThmân,and I did not hear any of them reciting Bismillâhir Rahmânir-RahIm."
so there is proof from kitab wa sunnah for that
-secoundly: he place his right hand on his left even after the rukou'
abu dawoud: 754. 'Abdullãh bin Az-Zubair said: "Lining up the feet, and placing one hand on the other, are from the Sunnah ." (Hasan)
755. AbU 'Uthmãn An-Nahdi narrated that from Ibn Mas'Ud, that he prayed with his left hand over his right, and the Prophet saw him, so he placed his right hand over his left. (Hasan)
759. It was reported from Sulaiman bin MUsã, from awous who said: "The Messenger of Allah used to place his right hand onhis left hand, then grasp both of them on his chest while he was praying." (sahih)
->the majority of scholar had said that it is for the standing when reciting fatiha and quran but ahmad rahimahoullah stated that the only precision here is that he (sws) placed his right on his left while standing and after ruku' your are standing so it based upon proof from kitab wa sunnah. and is not a muquallid thing. muquallid is to follow a thing even if proof from kitab wa sunnah contradict you. and sheikh shuraim are for from your accusation.
-thirldy: he pose his knee before his hand:
Abu Hurayrah said that the Prophet sws said, “If anyone of you were to make the prostration do not kneel like the kneeling of the camel but to place his two hands before his two knees." abu dawoud 840 (hasan by abu dawoud) mousnad ahmad volume 2 page 381 and other.
first thing is that i dont think tha ahmad ibn hanbal has addopted this personaly because he mentiones this hadith as sahih in his mousnad. ->so it is another proof that he is not muquallid. fear allah in yours lies
secoundly scholar had differ on his soundness because they see that the narrator who was'nt sure had say something contradictory :
"Indeed we say this because this part o f the hadith conflicts with the first part of the hadith whereby it says, “Do not kneel like the kneeling of the camel.” Thus the prohibition regarding the resemblance of the camel in the characteristics of the sujud is, “Do not kneel like the kneeling.” We witness that the camel, when it is about to kneel, de scends with its front legs first before its two knees of the hind legs whereby the front part of its body descends before the back. And if you were to descend with your two hands first, the upper part of your body shall descend before your lower part, then you have resembled the kneeling of the camel." so by some this hadith is shadh (anomalous)
Imam Ibn Qayyim said: 'Some of the narrators are not certain about some words of this Hadith since the first part of the Hadith contradicts the last part of the Hadith everyone knows that a camel places its hands before its knees'.
so they said that the right thing that the prophet had said is'nt " but to place his two hands before his two knees." because it was inversed,so the right thing he sws said is “But to place his two knees before his two hands."
and this complitely legit opinion it is strenghten with 2 hadith:
abu dawoud 838. It was reported from
from 'Asim bin Kulaib, from his father, from Wã'il bin Hujr, who said: "I saw that the Prophet
when he prostrated, he would place his knees (on the ground) before his hands, and when he stood up,
he would raise his hands before his knees." (Da'if isnad)
and 839 It was reported from Hammam who said: "Muhammad bin Juhadah narrated to us from 'Abdul-Jabbãr bin Wã'il, from his father, that the Prophet would ... so he mentioned the Hadith of the Salãt (no. 838) and said: "So when he fell into prostration, his knees touched the ground before his palms did." (da'if isnad) Hammäm said: And Shaqiq :narrated to us (he said): " 'Asim bin Kulaib narrated to me from his father, from the Prophet with similar to this." And in the narration of one of them - and I am almost sure it was the
narration of Muhammad bin Juhãdah - "And when he got up, he stood up on his knees, and took support from his thighs." da'if
some strenghten those hadith because it is corroborating with the 1ste after and because of their number: 3 man report a thing (even if his inad is da'if) they can'nt invented exactly the same thing (hadith from the prophet)or it would be it is extremely unlucky.
so there is'nt anything contradictory to sunnah here, there is no muquallid one more time because it is based upon their proof. and all the ommah are in consensus that you can do the 2. they just diverge on what is more liked.
-forthly: notice that when he get up from the sujoud he does'nt raise his hand to the shoulder (or highter) just before al fatiha which has 0 proof and is a muquallid mouvements.
beyound that know that normaly, it is upon you to take proof that shuraim is a muquallid. because it is an accusation so i wait for that yaa kadhaab one.
surah nour: "11 Those who have come with slander are a group of you. Do not think that it is an evil for you, but rather, it is a good for you. To each of them what he has acquired as sin. The one of them who has taken the greatest share will have a great punishment.
12 Why, when you heard it [this slander], did not the believing men and women in themselves conjecture favorably, and say, "This is an obvious slander?"
13 Why have they not produced [in support of their accusations] four witnesses? If they produce no witnesses, then they are the liars in the sight of Allah." fear allah.
"if anyone makes an untruthful accusation against a Muslim, he will be made by Allah to dwell in the corrupt fluid flowing from the inhabitants of Hell till he retracts his statement."Sunan Abi Dawud 3597. if you dont retract, know what will happen to you, and it will be 100% yours faults.
fear Allah ya jahil one
2odkore maryame filkitabe 2ina laha stafaha fidonya oifil2akhirahe
U can't see where he mention Salaji manhaj because you are ignorant but all what he is saying is the manhaj of the salafus Salih...u Jahil who is saying he did not say about Salafi, then go and learn the correct Aqeeda which is the Aqeeda of the salafus Salih...
This speaker is out of fold of islam does not represent Islam.Ibn wahab was declared outside the fold of Islam Kaffir,apostate. He was not given a Muslim funeral, his body was burned, to stop his followers grave worship. Any one that defends ibn wahab is out of the fold of Islam . His decdendents hijacked makka and Medina and locked, killed true king and mufti that upheld ibn tamiya was not a sheikh and ibn wahab was out fold of Islam. They replaced themselves in 1925 and started changing history of Islam, destroying evidences, proclaim themselves as holy authority. Wahabism and ahemdiya are cults out of the fold of Islam, they are not even sects of Islam.
Someone who calles to tawheed is outside the fold of islam? And who is muslim then, someone who worships awliya?
@@SaidB1n prophet Muhammad saw did not split tahweed into three bits , this is Bidda invitation. All work of ibn wahab is not a part of Islam. They are no different than ahemdiya , ibliss devil was best of angels we don't listen too ibliss devils etc.
Did you just made takfir on shuraim, an imam of Mecca for several years, and the scholar Ibn Abdul Wahhab ? That is extremely dangerous
@@Harbo1003 you Insinuating that not me. What these imams say is irrelevant and abrogated. They need correcting back true aqeeda that makes you true Sunni Muslims, they are following a deviant path,prophet Muhammad peace be upon has warned us about them. They dress like you, recite like you,but not word they recite will go down their necks, they are not from us , so correct them where ever you find them. This was fatwa advice of prophet Muhammad peace be upon him . We must do do just that salafi manaj is a modern kwaraji cult no different from ahemdiya cult. Cults are not a part of Islam. Learn the history of Islam ,history of wahabism and hijacking in 1925 of two of Islam most holiest places .
@@SaidB1n their tawheed is not the same tawheed taught to us by my Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him. Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him never spilt tahweed into different bits that is a Bidda of whabism innovators.
he visited darul uloom deobnad how very salafi of him!!
Masha Allah