Why Do People HATE Cat ACERT Engines?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 ส.ค. 2020
  • In this video we discussing the Cat ACERT engines and why nobody seems to like them. @AdeptApe on Venmo or AdeptApe@yahoo.com on PayPal for donations, thank you so much for supporting the channel! Thanks for watching.
    For questions, AdeptApe@yahoo.com
    You can help support the channel for free just by clicking the Amazon Affiliate Link here: amzn.to/3rKMz9b
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 724

  • @jjjthomasson8902
    @jjjthomasson8902 3 ปีที่แล้ว +299

    Josh, you need to be teaching somewhere. You are easy to understand and you have great communication skills

    • @michaelparker5072
      @michaelparker5072 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yet again a good video,we've had the same trouble over here in the U.K,and europe with our engines,up to euro 5,we had a choice of egr or scr,scr is favoured by anyone pulling at weight over here,as egr engines on the same work pretty much have a tendancy to blow up,a common one for that was the m.a.n 440 engine,the main reasons for having egr here,is to save on ad-blue(i think you lads call it def?),and to save some-one putting it in the wrong tank,same problems with vgt turbos,anything over 500 thou kms is a bonus,as against the good old fashioned turbo which here is good for a million kms or more,now we're just getting into euro 6,which is egr plus ad-blue,so we'll see how that lot holds up in time

    • @roberthowell932
      @roberthowell932 3 ปีที่แล้ว +22

      He is worth 4 times the amount of pay any PROF at a university is worth ....

    • @feron450
      @feron450 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      I wholeheartedly agree with this statement.

    • @NordboDK
      @NordboDK 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      He is

    • @droptopcampersrental78
      @droptopcampersrental78 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@roberthowell932 Hard skills... At the end of the day...there's ACTUAL value.

  • @Basstaco69
    @Basstaco69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +80

    Normal engineering thoughts: nothing was ever made to eat it’s own shit🤷🏼‍♂️
    EGR- Watch this 😏

    • @markgeorge2225
      @markgeorge2225 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      I
      Can you imagine what the human body would look like if the EPA was in charge of health care

    • @Basstaco69
      @Basstaco69 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@markgeorge2225 Oh wow... that is a thought to imagine 🤣

    • @electric7487
      @electric7487 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Exactly what happens when politicians are put in charge of things they know hardly anything about.

    • @lewdards1127
      @lewdards1127 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@markgeorge2225 lmao

    • @Shanidar1
      @Shanidar1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Labradors and Golden Retrievers: Watch this

  • @Zach_A
    @Zach_A 3 ปีที่แล้ว +49

    I went to school for this and have been working in the industry for a few years and this was the best explanation of emissions systems I've seen.

    • @dougbaer5752
      @dougbaer5752 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Most of the ARD heads failed due to the fact that the Primary fuel filter wasn't changed often, at least every 300 hours.

    • @maximefortier9300
      @maximefortier9300 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ARD heads also have fuel pressure solenoid which is in a fuel manifold which has a very fine strainer that looks like ceramic. It does get clogged overtime so even with maintenance done every 250 instead of 500 hours is still gets clogged. Problematic system anyways...

  • @daddy111ist
    @daddy111ist 3 ปีที่แล้ว +20

    I have a cat c 15 2007 acert mxs with 1444567 millon miles with no overhaul yet still running strong the acert system until 2007 make a little bit more complicated but no body can’t beat that boost,mine run 10 000 miles in every 21 days nonstop pulling flatbeds loads it’s just a beast with 3.55 rears and 13 eaton god bless caterpillar 🐛

    • @spoolinsvt6489
      @spoolinsvt6489 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      How is she holding up? @daddy111ist

  • @waynez1025
    @waynez1025 3 ปีที่แล้ว +56

    Never saw this guy in my life. His video just came on and couldn’t stop watching him. You have to love people that know their shit and are able to explain the theory behind it. Nice!

    • @THEDC81025
      @THEDC81025 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Me and you both 😂😂😂😂😂

  • @cullenmiller8170
    @cullenmiller8170 3 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    Thanks that was a lot information and I m glad I m out of the trucking business. If I ever had another truck it would be pre emissions and elogs. I’m so tired of government interference.

  • @southerncatfish4030
    @southerncatfish4030 3 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    I have a C15 Acert (NXS24662) It has been really good to me 1,4700,000. Going for it first inflame in a few weeks.

    • @jmh4ggg
      @jmh4ggg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      MXS 1,480,000 getting it rebuilt with the platinum kit aug 31st, looks like were about in the sane boat, mine started spitting up coolant so you're right on the money.

    • @jjjthomasson8902
      @jjjthomasson8902 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      jmh4ggg agreed! Had mine overhauled last November and I’ve been very happy with it. Good luck!

    • @waynewilliams9384
      @waynewilliams9384 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      What the coat of the in frame? I’m about the same mileage

    • @southerncatfish4030
      @southerncatfish4030 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Wayne that is going to depend on what kit you are going to buy. You have a Bronze, Sliver, Gold and Platinum rebuild kits. I went with a Platinum Kit with Turbos and a Compressor. Parts were right at $19,000 plus labor. My labor is going to run me right at $4500-$5,000. I also put a clutch and new u joints and carrier barring in the truck also. I am going to be getting 3 years unlimited miles warrantly on the engine with this also. Do your research and talk to your certified CAT mechanic. I have a great guy who works on my trucks and he has help me a lot and CAT financial has help me too. 18 months at 2% for all those parts

    • @waynewilliams9384
      @waynewilliams9384 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@southerncatfish4030 man thanks for the heads-up

  • @jonrobison8488
    @jonrobison8488 ปีที่แล้ว

    Of all the videos I watch on TH-cam. I feel like I get more information and knowledge from your videos than any other. As a owner/operator of a c-15. I really appreciate you. Thank you for the information that you share.

  • @carlos76c
    @carlos76c 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Great video to understand all this engines complexity. I’m learning to deal with my Land Rover Discovery 2 with a Td5 engine now with 250,000 Km. Got rid of EGR system and having some blow-by. Initially thought it was not normal. Tried venting to atmosphere (draft hose-tube) but had to re-connect CCV hose to the depression valve in the inlet turbo hose. The problem was low turbo vaccum in depression valve at inlet turbo hose because it was cracked causing not enough vacuum to fully open the depression ccv valve to get rid of blow-by fumes. Better left all systems stock.
    Greetings from Guayaquil, Ecuador 🇪🇨

  • @jeffearnest3269
    @jeffearnest3269 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I drive a 2004 school bus with the C 7 210 hp engine, it’s a good enough for me in the school bus but a few years ago a drove a 3406 475 hp in a KW hauling fuel and it’s a big difference in the power . Keep up the good job of letting us know about cat engines .

  • @jakefarrar5534
    @jakefarrar5534 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Josh. Thank you for your support and giving the great information you share.

  • @ChatBot1337
    @ChatBot1337 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    The worst part for everyone with early IVAs was [I believe if memory serves] 'IVA #x not responding' were troubleshot by Cat by swapping IVA heads, putting it all back together, have the customer run it until a code returned, then see if the code followed the head or stuck on one cylinder. As a service manager at that time, I fought Cat tooth and nail because they refused to pay for two repairs with only one failure. After a while, iva heads just got replaced, -7 codes got new sokenoids, then those damned ARD heads came out. Constantly updating head designs, pissing off customers because Cat would not cover spark plugs even on a failed warranty ARD head. Ugh. I don't miss those days. That said, I was an International service manager during the Maxxforce days, so times got way, way worse.

  • @briangladu5519
    @briangladu5519 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can listen to you all day man... your knowledge is incredible.

  • @stanpatterson5033
    @stanpatterson5033 3 ปีที่แล้ว +35

    ACERT - Advanced Cash Excruciating Removal Technique.

    • @electric7487
      @electric7487 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Delete, delete, delete.

    • @scottcurry479
      @scottcurry479 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Haven't found that to be the case at all. My local mechanics all recomend it over EGR Cummins or Detroit.

  • @birdeizzle
    @birdeizzle 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Much respect for the reasoning. Learn so much from you even tho I have a Detroit motor in my truck.

  • @larrytalley117
    @larrytalley117 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Love these CAT “lessons”. I’m so glad I have a 2004 C7. The potential HEUI issues scare me enough.

    • @AdeptApe
      @AdeptApe  3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Hi Larry.

    • @larrytalley117
      @larrytalley117 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@AdeptApe Hey back dude.... :)

  • @metusa666
    @metusa666 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Stumbled across your channel got immediately glued to it subscribed very interesting thank you !!

  • @andreychuprin7365
    @andreychuprin7365 3 ปีที่แล้ว +68

    Most guys nowadays rebuild them with 16:1 compression and delete the ivas. Keep the twins, good tune and you can have a good reliable engine with 700hp. As always thank you Josh for a very informative video! 👍👍

    • @bobrewer177
      @bobrewer177 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Andrey Chuprin twins means 2 turbos working on their own with 2 different sets of ductwork compounds work together ie the cat uses compound turbos that work together one small for low end torque one larger for broad rpm power being spooled by the other

    • @carsons6519
      @carsons6519 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@bobrewer177 yea they work together to make big hp and torque in the same way they were initially designed for..works great I have one..

    • @ryanprough253
      @ryanprough253 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Just don't go to a legit CAT dealer when you have issues! I will flash your ecm back to stock, and report it!

    • @carsons6519
      @carsons6519 3 ปีที่แล้ว +29

      @@ryanprough253 I have my own sis and cat ET and do my all my own work..my trucks never see a cat dealer and only a mom pop shop I know if not near home..yall dealers just fuck shit up anyways with your low nox files and crap..

    • @andreychuprin7365
      @andreychuprin7365 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

      @@ryanprough253 I'm glad I don't have to deal with you. Take sdp and shove it where light don't shine, I don't mind emissions control but they have to be reliable and cat is not, a year of owning a couple of sdp motors is enough to bankrupt a small trucking company so report all u want! In order for us to survive we have to do something about the shitty product cat made, oh another thing you might want to report is 3406e swapped in for sdp!

  • @frankyboy290
    @frankyboy290 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Good explanation , l have 06 cat c15 and your right about injector harness . I just replaced both a couple of weeks ago broken wire . They had over 700,000 miles on them , engine light came on . I've had this truck for 11 years , had a platinum kit done 7 years ago . Its been pretty good to me , good power half decent fuel mileage . What l like most is the independent Cat dealer network , when l have engine issues l dont take it to a peterbilt dealer l take to a Cat shop . Everyone of those Cat shops over the last 25 years have been really good , they have a lot of knowledge and experience . They always fix the problem and get me on my way in a timely fashion . I have had other trucks in that 25 year period all had Cat engines in them . Only reason I have had this truck so long is it has a Caterpillar , and when it comes time for in frame l will not hesitate .

    • @southerncatfish4030
      @southerncatfish4030 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I am like you Either my local Cat Mechanic here in NC or Thompson Cat in Tupelo MS

    • @isaacmontoya9144
      @isaacmontoya9144 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes sir my 06 mxs... platinum at 1 mill has 1.6 going strong... bully dog tuner, boost sensor harness.... its a beast .not best at fuel .3.36 rears.

  • @DaCaveman84
    @DaCaveman84 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you thank you for having a loud volume. Makes it so much easier to listen in a loud truck. 🤘

  • @HectorVillarreal23
    @HectorVillarreal23 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Thank you for all this info, it’s vital for me cause I own a C-15... Thanks again!

  • @Davefromwisconsin
    @Davefromwisconsin 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I’m a diehard CAT engine fan. I drove an 03 kenworth with a 550hp c-15 single turbo. Boy she’d scoot. Then I went to a 06 Detroit 14.7. It was alright. Then the biggest POS a maxxforce. I mean total junk. 2 egr coolers under warranty, a high pressure fuel pump under warranty and 4 egr valves under warranty. We live in the rust belt in Michigan and we were constantly changing coolant and oil pipes. Constant corrosion issues with lights. ABS lights on wet roads, way overly complicated hvac systems to keep us warm that we’re also constantly giving fits. Then four years ago I bought a Fitzgerald glider. Oh man talk about reducing maintenance cost! It’s got a 12.7 Detroit with 540k on it now. The only thing I had troubles with was the cylinder head leaking oil which was done twice because the front structure also was part of the problem. She’s the best truck I’ve owned so far and definitely believe I’ll get a million plus before the next overhaul. Still partial to CATS tho. Keep the vids coming. 👍

  • @thetexasboys.8988
    @thetexasboys.8988 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    ACERT Advanced Combustion Emissions Research Technology. It worked in some engines. It was a very small injection of fuel before the injection cycle. The idea was to add fuel to fire (pre-ignition) at TDC +- (depending on flash file) and burn all of the fuel, instead of adding fuel to compression that caused ignition but did not burn all of the fuel before being expelled through the exhaust. Every injector fired twice which is the reason trim files were very important. Incorrect trim file would cause excessive fuel consumption. Great video!

  • @SuperDriver379
    @SuperDriver379 3 ปีที่แล้ว +28

    There is another way to solve this problem, politically, isolate the heavy truck engine line to its own LLC, make a very simple and reliable engine that doesn’t meet the EPA’s standards(what the customer wants), pay the fines, get government stimulus (your fine back) because the business isn’t viable do to the fines, and the line is an infrastructure necessity. To beat the government, beat them at their own game...

    • @billneill6417
      @billneill6417 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes , let's go back to the days of smoke polluting diesel engines . I remember the 50' thru the 80's and into the 90's . We cleaned up the engines , and also the fuel .

    • @rjbradlow
      @rjbradlow 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@billneill6417 own and operate a truck in today's market which still has the freight rates from back then and you'll be whistling a different tune.
      The government is the biggest polluter and spender; i.e. the most corrupt hypocrites on the planet.
      They profit off of all this crap and cost the rest of us a fortune through inflation while our wages have stagnated.
      Look at everything in the military, plus other industries... ships, jets, heavy equipment, trains, city owned garbage trucks, etc... STILL rolling coal (black soot).
      They only target and enforce emission regulations on trucks and cars without which this country would come to a screeching halt.

    • @392nightrunner
      @392nightrunner ปีที่แล้ว

      My glider truck has a 93 series 60 Detroit, it barely smokes any, just a little poof between shifts if under a heavy load

  • @samfonov
    @samfonov ปีที่แล้ว

    Your one of the best TH-cam channels I stumbled on researching c15s

  • @jimmyray4153
    @jimmyray4153 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Josh is awesome. He really knows his stuff and can explain it unlike other people who just show up to collect a paycheck.

  • @BWGPEI
    @BWGPEI ปีที่แล้ว

    As an old technical writer, bless you for explaining the acronyms!

  • @electric7487
    @electric7487 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    00:55 Part 1: What is Acert?
    02:55 Part 2: Medium-duty engines
    04:37 Part 3: Heavy-duty engines
    07:28 Part 4: Particulate matter
    08:47 Part 5: NOx
    10:15 Part 6: IVA's and VVA's
    12:34 Part 7: A turn for the worse
    13:55 Part 8: Particulate matter, part 2
    17:02 Part 9: NOx, part 2
    17:55 Part 10: Is this EGR? No, this is CGI.
    20:01 Part 11: Blow-by
    22:21 Part 12: Fuel systems
    23:14 Part 13: Conclusion

    • @AdeptApe
      @AdeptApe  3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Thank you for the glossary.

  • @downshifthard
    @downshifthard 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for all you do with these videos man! As someone who just bought my first diesel pusher motorhome (2005 C7) and immediately started regretting the purchase after all the people online trash talking it, it makes much more sense now that my CAT should be fine with just proper maintenance.

  • @firsttimediesels6289
    @firsttimediesels6289 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is really great info, taking notes is making it grueling but I'm learning alot

  • @davidmattice2613
    @davidmattice2613 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks ive been a truck mechanic for 30+ years, and working for fleets i don't get into this till they warranty is long gone. And cat has always been bring it to me. So it gave me a reason to hate them, ie im pro Cummins. Until they brought in this emission bs. Anything after the N14 sucks.but i was always impressed by their c7, extremely good on fuel, but had the problems like every other engine in the day. And you just explained everything to me. Thanks!

  • @JuanAlvarez-np8re
    @JuanAlvarez-np8re 3 ปีที่แล้ว +44

    I'll keep my old 3406b all mechanical. Never any problems, reliable, good fuel economy and pushing around 650 hp. And very easy to work on were I can do most of my own work.

    • @vincentrobinette1507
      @vincentrobinette1507 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      User serviceability is everything....Especially, when it's a road side repair! Huge savings in money and down time.

    • @angelosmith8755
      @angelosmith8755 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      The best engine ever made by Cat.

    • @basiltaylor8910
      @basiltaylor8910 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Very sensible ,stick to what you know , anything geeky leaves me cold,as we in the UK are not blessed with these geeky KittyCats, especially the small C7,s and C9,s.Far as small engines are concerned Clessie Cummins is dominant in UK , their little four pot ISME 'lawnmower' engine very popular with DAF and IVECO, yes those Italian washing machine makers use them,and the ultra quiet reworked 6BTA and Hestair Dennis uses the 8,3 litre C series in Trident buses. Reading some of the comments from owners and drivers KittyCat,s ACERT engine is a bag of shit. Is the 3406 and later C16 the same engine ?. Like you i want my KittyCat C16 to meow 650 ponies reliably , and what is their torque delivery between 900-1800 rpm,as i want the big Kitty to meow away from the traffic lights at 900 rpm without any problems.

    • @caterpillar6nz310
      @caterpillar6nz310 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@angelosmith8755 c15 6nz for me

    • @rgnichols567
      @rgnichols567 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Oh yes, 3406 one of my all time favorite engines!!

  • @jimmahaffey9375
    @jimmahaffey9375 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Well spoke and very informative..I learned a lot about Caterpillar truck engines

  • @colonelmann
    @colonelmann 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good stuff to know. I had no clue what ACERT meant on my 04 C7

  • @mikescaffo4850
    @mikescaffo4850 ปีที่แล้ว

    Josh you are a great mechanic and have a ton of general knowledge thanks for sharing

  • @brianlee6849
    @brianlee6849 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I owed a 2001 C-15 " 6NZ " best engine I ever had in over 30 years truck driving since 89. Wish I still had it. Thank you 👍

  • @DanBowkley
    @DanBowkley ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I had one in an '05 379 and absolutely loved it. Those compound turbos could drag a mountain up the side of another mountain.

  • @jjjthomasson8902
    @jjjthomasson8902 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I love my ‘05 Acert! Had mine overhauled last November after 1.6 million and nothing more other than maintenance items and like Josh said, the occasional IVA problem which was an easy fix.

    • @albertosepulveda-lozoya3263
      @albertosepulveda-lozoya3263 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Has the iva ever given you problems with the engine breaks?

    • @jjjthomasson8902
      @jjjthomasson8902 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@albertosepulveda-lozoya3263 no, the only problem I had associated with my IVA’s was a check engine light. I never had a breakdown or performance related issue.

  • @StevePhillips76
    @StevePhillips76 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great explanation. I remember when these came out. It's too bad the epa didn't leave them alone, 02 seemed to be the best year for truck engines. Thank for the video.

  • @giggiddy
    @giggiddy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Josh, I'm a nut for durability and longevity videos. I go crazy over the stuff you post about million mile and high hour engines and internal wear. If you could someday do a video about Cat generator/truck engines with crazy miles and 40k+ hours and how they got there, how they were maintained, and what parts were still original. I've read about Cat generators that have run basically non-stop for years on end, on islands and places with no other power source. Love your stuff immensely. Take care and thanks.

    • @daddy111ist
      @daddy111ist 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I have a cat c 15 acert 2007 with 1444568 million miles with no overhaul yet, and still running strong it has 44457 hours has a right now

    • @chevy36ful
      @chevy36ful 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Just pull C32 out of D11, just over 15000 hours and 2 million litres of fuel. The engine had not failed just hours . Most cats in mining are rebuild at 15000 hours, no in frame repairs.

    • @giggiddy
      @giggiddy 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@daddy111ist That fascinates me how those parts can hold up to all those heat cycles and rotations and friction. I remember in the 70s, my parents had gasoline cars that would get junked after 50k miles. Engines were worn out. I realize that diesels are a different animal but it goes to show that if manufacturers wanted to make internal combustion engines last forever, they could. Thanks for sharing

    • @giggiddy
      @giggiddy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@chevy36ful That's a D11 dozer? 15k hours on it? Man, if you take care of them, they can make you alot of money before they need a rebuild

    • @chevy36ful
      @chevy36ful 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      D Smith 15000 hours is normal change out time. The C15 I’m rebuilding now had 16000 hrs and not failed it will be sent back to service for anther 15000hrs Cat we’re made to rebuild.

  • @reedsilvesan2197
    @reedsilvesan2197 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I run water injection on my 6nz c-15, which significantly reduces heat in the combustion chambers.
    This is a very good way to reduce or eliminate Nox. It also increases the torque of the engine by about 25 to 30%.
    I see a significant reduction in coolant temperature and also EGTs.
    I wouldn't run without it
    Too many advantages with no downside other than the cost and having to fill the water tanks.
    It will NOT damage the engine AT ALL if properly installed and operated correctly. Sno-performance has an excellent system.
    If you install this system I highly recommend you install at least a 30 gallon tank. I have 2 such tanks.
    These large engines can burn 60 to 80 gallons a day.
    I have been running it for over 10 years now, and have never had any problems with it or damage to my engines.
    This is the second engine I have run it on.
    NOTE; it's only effective on hills, and steep grades. It does not even activate on flat land.

    • @electric7487
      @electric7487 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      While it seems counterintuitive, water and water/methanol injection on large Diesel engines has been shown to be able to reduce _both PM and NOx._

    • @crabmansteve6844
      @crabmansteve6844 ปีที่แล้ว

      100% there with you on a water injection

  • @andy1845c
    @andy1845c 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for making this. I learned a lot.

  • @vernt4583
    @vernt4583 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very well explained. Keep your videos coming

  • @ClipSwitchFlashlights
    @ClipSwitchFlashlights ปีที่แล้ว

    Had a fun IVA fiasco the other day on a BXS. The #1 IVA was sticking intermittently but it would stick even without oil pressure (control valve open). It also was staying open just enough to cause a miss with little to no white smoke. But also the miss wouldn’t go away when backing the IVA completely off. Found the problem by backing the IVA off while the engine was running (which would make the miss momentarily go away). Retaining nut was intact but the o-rings on the cylinder were shot.
    Same engine, another tech had backed all the IVAs off previously and readjusted them. It had an intermittent ticking and sometimes knocking noise in the top end. The noise came in when the IVA control valve was closed. All the IVAs were noisy but disconnecting #4 made the most dramatic reduction in sound. I didn’t see the retaining nut for the foot falling out like you sometimes do, so I assumed an o-ring failure similar to #1 was taking place. Backed it off and very quickly learned that the slave pistons will come out all the way if there is no nut in there at all. The foot cocked sideways and the rocker arm had no way to return. The piston pushing back up on the valves made short work of the rocker arm…

  • @nechko707
    @nechko707 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Man thank you that was a lesson i need for my c15 now i beter understand my engine and how it works all around GREAT JOB love video keep up uploading videos 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 🌟 and one more 🌟

  • @rubenayala2203
    @rubenayala2203 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    U just clarified alot for me. Very informative. Gud video! Thank u so much for that!

  • @brianhurt3801
    @brianhurt3801 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You covered everything sir with rebuttal great job

  • @danhayes3546
    @danhayes3546 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love watching these cat videos I don’t even have a truck bus rv or excavator but just carry on watching 👍

  • @craigschulz1852
    @craigschulz1852 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I drove a 2011 Peterbilt with a C13. What a nightmare regarding the Acert contraption. Every 6 months it was guaranteed to go in for replacement. My boss, finally pissed enough money away because of it decided to delete it along with the DPF. The truck went from barely being able to drive 60 Mph fully loaded and having to fuel up every 2 days to after the delete, to being able to hit 80 mph fully loaded & being able to fuel up every 3 days. What a difference. I drove that truck 1.2 million miles & it was a good truck once it was deleted.

  • @Theyrun
    @Theyrun 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Would love to find a Cummins break down like this. Excellent video!

  • @emeraldisle70
    @emeraldisle70 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Wealth of knowledge. Thanks for sharing.

  • @amirbiscevic8944
    @amirbiscevic8944 ปีที่แล้ว

    You are very intelligent young man. Thank you for clearing that up.!!!!

  • @mindquad779
    @mindquad779 ปีที่แล้ว

    this video is phenomenal!! thanks so much for what you do man

  • @CoopaCoop
    @CoopaCoop 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    I work on c13 LEE Acerts everyday in MCI buses. The engine really is good. We have 18 of them and never had a major engine failure. I find if you change the ARD every year or so you're golden. I have a record of every ARD changed and for us and the type of miles our buses do, the ARD will fail between 10 and 14 months. Also we change the DPF around every 2 to 3 years. Do that and keep up with maintenance and you'll last forever. They all have about 900k of them. The only other issue iv been finding is high crank case pressure which pushes the oil out the stick. You NEED to not overfill them and you must change the crank case filter!! Also noticed the rear main housing behind the bell housing leaks alot. Gotta take it apart, changed the gasket and lock tight the bolts. Also gray silicon it too
    Injectors last forever, turbos, water pump, oil pump, IVA, EGR also last forever.
    Only think I don't like is that if I get a hard code for say, loss of combination/high soot. I find the ARD is bad soooo I changed it. Now I fixed the issue BUT I can't Regen it to clear the code. The only way to clear the code is to have a successful Regen lol. See the issue here? So we have to call cat in to clear the code.... Kinda shitty. Weve (njt) have owned these engines since 2008....
    I don't blame cat for saying FU to the EPA and dropping out.

    • @robpeters5204
      @robpeters5204 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jon Cooper sounds like you work for a company with deep pockets to be changing all those parts on a regular service interval. Do you work for a municipal garage where taxpayers are funding the shop? That's the only way you can do it.

    • @CoopaCoop
      @CoopaCoop 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@robpeters5204 yes sir. But sadly with the type of driving our buses do, over the past 10 years iv never seen an ard head last over 13 months. It's almost like clock work that they fail between the 7 to 8 month mark. In parts it cost about 1,700$. That's for the head, 2 fuel fittings, spark plug, gaskets, and the 3 temp sensors. I'm sure you can get away with just doing the head and fuel filter fittings for around 850$. We rather fix it early and avoid the road call. Also it's new Jersey transit. Other then the ard issues, the engines is good. Never had a catastrophic failure. The buses with the cats all have around 900k on them. I changed 3 motors around that milage for high crank case pressure with recently low oil pressure. The engines get rebuild in house and cat comes and warranties them.

    • @CoopaCoop
      @CoopaCoop 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      With that said.. if it was a privite business and it was up to me I'd probably stick with the non LEE Acerts. Think like pre 2007. No regen, AVI's, and no CGI. You need deep pockets and be able to do your own work to have a fleet of LEE c13s lol

    • @user-ln7of9gs4s
      @user-ln7of9gs4s 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@CoopaCoop sadly I think they got rid of most of the last of the series 60 buses. I could never find out where their auctions went to. Replacing parts early is still cheaper than a tow bill/breakdown.
      We’re you a diesel tech or did you work on all the systems for the buses? I’m always looking for someone familiar with MCI’s, for reference to talk about, from 2007 and older. Thanks.

    • @CoopaCoop
      @CoopaCoop 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@user-ln7of9gs4s yeah we had about 100 mci with the series 60 in them that we retired 2 or 3 years ago now. That's just our garage. Company wide, we probably retired 800 or so. Bus numbers were 7400's, 8200's, 8500's, 7900s, 7800s, and probably another 1 or 2 I'm forgetting.
      I wanna say that almost all were all sold to a single company In the northeast. A scrap yard. Most of our buses were from 1998. We had the series 60 Detroit diesels and we had about 55 of the natural gas version of the 60.
      Now we have 18 of the c13 cats
      About 50 with the Cummins X12
      And about 130 with Cummins ISL-G (natural gas)
      The natural gas buses (CNG) are a complete nightmare. Its a tiny 8.9 liter engine in a
      45 ft, 55,000 pound vehicle. Mind you all our other engines are and were either 12 or 13 liters. Every engine has blown up with cracked pistons before 200,000 miles. They all got upgrade steel positions. Now almost everyone has had a failed head, dropped a valve, blown oil coolers, or blown head gasket.

  • @gm16v149
    @gm16v149 3 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    One reason C15 ACERTS weren’t liked that much in Australia was because the engines were designed to lug down at lower rpm than the single turbo C15s and 3406s. It just doesn’t work when you’re running weights of minimum 65 tons up to 200 tons with multiple trailers. Also if one turbo goes out, you’ve got to replace both as a rule. Any wiring under the valve covers has to be replaced fairly regularly because it cooks under our hot conditions. At least we didn’t have to run particulate filters and the rest of that crap on our ACERTs when they were installing them in our new trucks. Now if only they’d gone to using DEF like the other engine manufacturers they’d probably still be around...

    • @isaac8334
      @isaac8334 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Is the cat acert bad ? I'm not too sure but my truck after 8 years and 1.2 million km still going good its 2009 C15 Acert I service it on time, but I was worried years ago when I bought it but not any more since it kept me going well after 8 years.

    • @justinmartin8887
      @justinmartin8887 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@isaakgentz7393they still ended up using it eventually. It was get with the game or use Cummins in your off highway. You know what they decided to do

  • @u.s.a8373
    @u.s.a8373 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    That’s why I’m sticking with the 6NZ and 3406E

  • @davesstillhere
    @davesstillhere 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Outstanding explanation, sir. Definitely a better explanation than DPC modules give. I do, however, have one small correction-
    NOx is representative of nitrogen oxides, not nitrous oxides. Nitrogen oxides are emissions, nitrous oxides belong in your drag car.

  • @HarleybyHerm_
    @HarleybyHerm_ 3 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    I know this is frowned upon, but we run a 4 2008 sdp petes, gave usual trouble, But have all been deleted, Best trucks we own even better than newer 2011+ trucks in our fleet(isx’s). Also it shocking to see how clean they still burn with emissions gone

    • @2ndMomentumGarage
      @2ndMomentumGarage 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Did you gut the DPF or straight pipe the exhaust?

  • @jimmahaffey9368
    @jimmahaffey9368 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent presentation...I learned a lot.,..I hated how the c15..c-15 run with such high coolant temperatures..many times during overhaul s would find out the head was cracked because of it.

  • @MrBigR928
    @MrBigR928 3 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Love my 1996 3406e👍🏾

  • @77Aaronw77
    @77Aaronw77 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    i wish youd put out vids more frequently. Thx for your knowledge

  • @Madcracka
    @Madcracka ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you I was looking to get a used glider with low miles that happens to have an '07 Acert. Currently I'm driving a 97 Detroit 12.7. I'm going to stick with it.

  • @plumber77mjr
    @plumber77mjr 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you, your knowledge is amazing!

  • @tygreenwood472
    @tygreenwood472 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This guy is great brilliant video really knows his stuff even if you have a short attention span which most of us do this guy did a very good job with this video.. long live the cat truck motor 👍🏾

  • @jamesyandaki7588
    @jamesyandaki7588 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you Josh for Sharing. Greetings from Hastings Deering papua new Guinea 🇵🇬

  • @AlanAlan-pb9vl
    @AlanAlan-pb9vl 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I had 04 Freightliner Acert C-15-6NZ single turbo. Had no problems BUT did some mod to push more turbo pressure. More quickly. Didnt use any more fuel if driven conservatively. But if i needed power more quicly ( if pulling loaded through a sidden off road mud hole)

  • @salmonaco007
    @salmonaco007 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    I'll stay with a 425 mechanical catterpillar thank you

  • @TheCntryson47
    @TheCntryson47 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I always wondered why they used the ARD head vs the DOC that Cummins and detroit used. I never had an issue with Avery's, pre dpf. Other than the Turbos made some accessibility issues

  • @michaelpperrault
    @michaelpperrault 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I've been running my /05 WS with a 475hp ACERT C15, it's been a hell of allot better than any DPF engine. Although I have replaced 2 VVAs and just got a 385-3 code the IVA. but it's still running and hasn't derated the power.

  • @jakesbackhoedozerservice7010
    @jakesbackhoedozerservice7010 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My 2005 C13 has been pretty good to me. Thank you for posting I’m going to install a switchblade turbo this fall on it.

    • @misiclover1658
      @misiclover1658 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I'm surprised Cat hasn't elected to go w/ Switchblade Turbos.
      The guys who have installed them on their Cat engines seem to LOVE 'em.
      One other comment. Use CAT filters. There is no comparison. Check the tear down videos of the frams wixes, and other cheap ones.

    • @jakesbackhoedozerservice7010
      @jakesbackhoedozerservice7010 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@misiclover1658 I do use Cat filters on all my caterpillars 😎

  • @apn42
    @apn42 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The purpose of EGR is to add inert air to the combustion chamber to lower the oxygen content which reduces NOx formation. This can also be accomplished using water injection.

  • @kiwidiesel
    @kiwidiesel 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This was next level helpful thanks🙏

  • @traviseggl3794
    @traviseggl3794 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I had a PDI tuned C15 Acert making 700 hp at the flywheel that I finally rebuilt with just shy of 1 million miles due to the head gasket letting go. It was a good engine. I think the only thing we did was update the rocker arm studs when one broke, other than that it got serviced every 10,000 miles. It got worked hard too pulling tri-axle grain trailers grossing 94,000, and over 100,000lbs in the fall through spring. The PDI tuning added over 1/2 mpg, but it was still down roughly 1/2 mpg compared to my old 6NZ.

    • @jt4896782
      @jt4896782 ปีที่แล้ว

      what was your overall mpg?

  • @joemac3118
    @joemac3118 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I had an 07 w900 with an 550hp acert and it was absolutely fantastic. That C15 was a horse. Only two problems it ever had was after 700,000 miles, the injectors became very difficult and had to change out the jakes twice because they kept decentigrating. I wanted to convert the twin turbo over to a single because let's face it. They are trash and even cat realized that,but to do it,it was going to run about 10,000 dollars for the conversion so needless to say. It still has the twin.

    • @sheltav64
      @sheltav64 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I have a 07 379 with a acert I also love it ! I’m only at 475 hp though.

  • @deant876
    @deant876 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    We are running the ISX 15L Cummins at work we had a VGT turbo seal failure that sent oil into the scr/dpf just after a passive regen (thats the dealers thought). The fire department showed up and ripped the whole system out from under the truck and hosed it down. $32,000 in part (needed turbo to the stack). The insurance company totaled the truck. Now after watching this video I wonder if a plugged blow by tube was to blame for the turbo seal failure. Thank you I will have to look into that on our other trucks

    • @deant876
      @deant876 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      So after looking into it, the ISX has a filter for the blow by. Its on the drivers side behind the charge air cooler pipe. Now I know

  • @GIGABACHI
    @GIGABACHI 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    All they needed was independent VVT for both intake and exhaust sides like the one used on every modern gasoline fed four banger nowadays, DPF, DEF and maybe a small[quick spool, off idle high boost] and a big[high HP top end] turbos in series.
    OR one super expensive and complicated VGT turbo to keep parts count down.

  • @guyconnell2250
    @guyconnell2250 3 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    The whole NOX thing is what sticks in my craw. NOX goes up with leaner burns. Within limits of engine destruction safety, leaner burn results in less fuel burned. One of the ways to reduce NOX, along with the various after treatments, is to lower the AFR, resulting in poorer mpg. So the net result, all else being more or less equal, is more fuel burned to "reduce emissions". That seems like a paradox to me.

    • @jellyfrosh9102
      @jellyfrosh9102 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Don't forget to clean a DPF you have to burn more fuel too. Saving the environment by burning twice as much diesel.

    • @nerd1000ify
      @nerd1000ify 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Limiting NOx has nothing to do with climate change. The simple fact is that NOx and diesel particulates are toxins that cause respiratory diseases and cancer. Drive around without emissions control equipment and you are making your own little crowdfund contribution to killing someone's kids. The people in the EPA and organisations like it made the judgement call that killing fewer people was more important than preventing climate change, so they mandated the NOx and PM controls first and hoped to get the CO2 under control later.

    • @jellyfrosh9102
      @jellyfrosh9102 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@nerd1000ify "think of the children!"
      Jesus dude can you come up with a less tired and overused argument for something? We had 0 emissions on diesels for a century and people weren't dying in the streets, quit being fucking dramatic.

    • @electric7487
      @electric7487 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That's why they came up with the DEF/Adblue system. Lean burn = efficient combustion = low PM, then the Adblue takes care of the NOx emissions.

    • @SOHCGT96
      @SOHCGT96 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@jellyfrosh9102 also don't forget, ultra low sulfur fuel is slightly less energy dense so you have to use more, and you can make less per barrel of crude so you use more oil to create the same amount of fuel. We're literally just trading one problem for another and creating much more expensive, less reliable engines along the way.

  • @krishnakotisaipottupalli8476
    @krishnakotisaipottupalli8476 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, thanks for your brilliant videos. I am looking forward to a video about 3516A EIS. Please share the pinout too.

  • @larselder874
    @larselder874 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    In 2007, getting ready for 2010 EPA regulations. EPA came to town with their advisory board. Meeting: They said that Cat has to meet the upcoming 2010 regulation when fuel is contaminated. Our refineries do produce low sulfur diesel. But thru pipes and storage tanks, sulfur content does go up. They (EPA and their party boys) refused to answer the question posed = "What are the contamination we now need to design and build for???" No answer. So they left for Chicago tourism on the USA tab. I had wanted to install co-generation off of the exhaust manifold in the C11 thru C18 engines. This provides 6% to 12% increase. The 2006 ACERT had already increased milage to 6.8 MPG from 6 MPG on C13 {as i remember} while providing no soot exhaust. The wiring harness - keep these at stand off, away from trapped heat areas.

  • @craiglinda6352
    @craiglinda6352 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Very well explained! Thank you!!

  • @DLTJR1959
    @DLTJR1959 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have a KCB in an 06 Wanderlodge. It is pre emissions and was probably built in 04 or 05. In a 50K pound bus it performs really well but is a little thirsty. I have a friend that is a CAT certified mechanic that works at the local CAT shop. She said that they were pretty much bullet proof, just keep up with the maintenance. I'll never wear it out. It will last longer than I will. My son can play with it when I am dead and gone if he wishes.

  • @sethmills7701
    @sethmills7701 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    We bought a 2008 f750 with a c7 acert, the engine tag list the hp as a 360. Pretty cool

  • @JAleksandr
    @JAleksandr 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The amount of bs I get for loving my ‘06 Pete acert the way it is and not “you need to single that POS and flash it” is insane…

  • @blacksmoke5009
    @blacksmoke5009 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent video Thankyou for sharing 👍

  • @shanepersons383
    @shanepersons383 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    All i can say is my last C-
    15 Acert had well over a mil miles on it and one overhead @ 534g and she was as clean as new because i know😎😉 how and what she needed to keep her fit! And we had. 7 C-13 engines that were very awesome pulling heavy haul all there lives to at least a mil each! But i will take A 3406E anyday 🤘🤘🤘 Cat power forever here!

  • @chief1193
    @chief1193 3 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    I think it’s a great Engine, you can’t beat that 60lbs of boost.

    • @isaacmontoya9144
      @isaacmontoya9144 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      Yes sir my mxs... 1 mill overhaul now 1.6 going strong... bullydog tuner and turbo boost harness... its a beast

    • @jmh4ggg
      @jmh4ggg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@isaacmontoya9144 I have an MXS too. Getting it rebuilt the week of august 31st at 1.5 million miles. I'm getting a new turbo too and was worried about high boost pressures...so I was wondering if I should turn it down or something...but per your comment, it does no harm.

    • @isaacmontoya9144
      @isaacmontoya9144 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jmh4ggg no harm... with boost harness and turner at power... i see boost at 63 to 65 at full tilt. Obviously I don't run it like that ..lol

    • @ernierobles972
      @ernierobles972 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Chief119 my runs great boost about 60 pounds also changed both turbos at 1,750,000 I get really good fuel mileage on my 379 when it’s not windy.

    • @jmh4ggg
      @jmh4ggg 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@isaacmontoya9144 Yeah mine hasn't touched 30psi since i've had it...reason why i'm rebuilding and replacing turbos with it.

  • @Ripsaw17
    @Ripsaw17 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    That is by far the best EGR system ever built in my opinion pulling exhaust after the DPF system it was brilliant

  • @Benjimac379
    @Benjimac379 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Love the C15 acert the sound of it sounds mean even with out straight pipes

  • @TolaTrucking
    @TolaTrucking 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I run an MXS purchased in 2014 it had inframe done just before purchasing
    Only engine problems I've had was an injector and replaced the IVA connectors myself as a prevention.
    7.1 MPG average since ownership
    Only get 40 PSI in boost
    Put straight pipes which reduced my EGTs drastically.
    Great engine so far anyway.

    • @jmh4ggg
      @jmh4ggg 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      We have the same truck. Mines a 2005 387 with the MXS in it.
      www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B06XHVHZHX?psc=1&ref=ppx_pop_mob_b_asin_title
      These will bring you up to 2020 lol. 350 for both headlights. Haven't had any issues with them so far.

    • @TolaTrucking
      @TolaTrucking 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jmh4ggg installed a pair last week exect ones.
      Was disappointed they didn't have access to adjusting screw on the side like originals.

  • @hoost3056
    @hoost3056 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    ACERTS were not bad.....but yes the actuators were a pain in the butt. The combo of high compression and high boost from the compounds plus the added complexity hurt reliability. Reprogramming those big block engines changed everything.....they run HARD.

    • @theboatman360
      @theboatman360 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      So the c13 2006 model was good to go also the c15

  • @randallyarborough7923
    @randallyarborough7923 ปีที่แล้ว

    Gotta watch this one again. A lot of good info there

  • @veljkodjukic770
    @veljkodjukic770 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for explaining

  • @chadbell8993
    @chadbell8993 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great video as always. Didnt the c15 acert have a longer stroke than previous c15's?

  • @Mark_Tschetter
    @Mark_Tschetter 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for the info.

  • @victorchavez6266
    @victorchavez6266 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    I have a 2007 c15 acert. I put 1,700,000 before overhaul. To be clear. My engine didn't broke down on me. I did the overhaul because I though it was time to do it. It was running like a champ before overhaul.

    • @cesar9496
      @cesar9496 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have an 06 and so far has been amazing. I still have everything stock. It’s still governed as well. What would you recommend me to do to it so it can give me that kind of life yours did? Other than maintenance? Should I tune it and run a straight pipe or leave it alone? Thank you.

    • @victorchavez6266
      @victorchavez6266 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@cesar9496 what I recommend to you is that. Add a Lucas oil stabilizer every oil change. 9glls of oil and 1 Glln of Lucas. I changed my oil every 13,000 to 15,000 miles. Caterpillar filters. I don't like white filters.🤭

    • @cesar9496
      @cesar9496 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@victorchavez6266 yeah I have always used caterpillar filters. Hey thanks a lot, I always trusted Lucas. Never used it on my c15 but in other motors I have. Should I leave it alone with the catalytic converter and untuned?

    • @victorchavez6266
      @victorchavez6266 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@cesar9496 yea,not a problem. I still have mine. I bump my from 375 hpwer to 500 in Effingham, IL. I'm happy with that hpwer.

    • @cesar9496
      @cesar9496 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@victorchavez6266 awesome. Hey thanks a lot bro! My last name Chavez too by the way! Greetings from Houston, TX and keep on trucking!

  • @peterweiss6140
    @peterweiss6140 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Long story short, keep in mind my mileage is Canadian numbers. Had a C15 1994 475 hp, trouble free 8-9 mpg pulling 140,000 lbs. Bought a new Pete 2005 C15 550 hp same job same weight. Always in the shop we called them Vivas always needing adjusting mpg? 4.5-5 so less pollution but you burn way more fuel. Let’s not even talk about the junk out there now. That 1994 is still hauling Stateside my neighbour bought it, no issues regular maintenance. I sold it with about 850,000 miles and only did a bearing roll in. He’s well over 1 million miles and she’s never been apart. Now that was a motor.

  • @0901sandman
    @0901sandman 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Fantastic job of simplifying the complexities of the BO administration's EPA IW. ( Infinite Wisdom)

    • @jimmyaber5920
      @jimmyaber5920 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      jim benton but the bulk of the regulations were in place or were in progress before he was elected. DPF was on the books in George W’s first term. The next reduction also came in under GW. The next went into effect when Obama was in but were on the books before and he didn’t stop them. It is popular to blame everything on him but it just ain’t true.

    • @0901sandman
      @0901sandman 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      We know that doesnt happen today.

  • @mikemorrison5301
    @mikemorrison5301 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good info mate, keep it up

  • @jessecontreras7677
    @jessecontreras7677 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    very informative thank you!

  • @billbeck1913
    @billbeck1913 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video A Ape, I like your objective sarcasm on what cost the engine manufactures and industry billions. It's no wonder why Cat stepped away from over the road applications. The EPA continues to bring on the demise of the diesel engine.