Emissions Liability Management: Can an accounting framework fix carbon credits?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 19 ก.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 4

  • @ypshafira
    @ypshafira 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    new subscriber here, thanks for all your explanation, helps a lot

  • @harriskarim4507
    @harriskarim4507 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for the great explanation. ELM seems an interesting concept and the benefits do resolve some of the heavily criticised aspects of the VCM.
    For big corps, this adds additional overhead esp. in terms of records management in a heavily resource and capital constrained environment. Will massively stifle adoption. Any solution to grow the VCM in a scalable and transparent manner needs to reduce the burden from the buyers of the credits not add to unfortunately (unless youre microsoft)

    • @eliasayrey5188
      @eliasayrey5188  9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Yeah, my hope is that more services like Rubicon pop up and offer it as a service instead of companies taking it on themselves.

  • @Steve.Q
    @Steve.Q 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks for the excellent explainer! I dig the straightforward style!
    How do you think ELM would impact the CDR market (1000s+ yrs permanence)? Perhaps a one-time purchase of a permanently removed tonne of C, would be less costly and require less administration than repeated purchases of 40 yr credits and therefore increase demand of CDR?