There will be hundreds of Starships on Mars before NASAs nuclear powered ship gets there for the first time. Most Starship trips will be cargo anyway where it doesn't really matter how long the trip takes as long as there is a steady stream of ships going to Mars to establish a supply chain. SpaceX has had over 100 launches in the last 12 months. SLS is targeting one per year. The nuclear Mars ship will probably only go to Mars every 2-4 years. You can't build a supply chain that way.
A nuclear fusion engine will not likely be an efficient launch engine, however, a Space X rocket could ferry a nuclear propulsion capable Mars craft into space where it could propel the space craft to speeds unseen. It would be wise to send several drone rockets to mars in advance with supplies, emergency supplies parts and electronics.
Project NERVA, proposed and demonstrated a nuclear engine during the late 1950s. It worked exceedingly well. The fear of launching a fully functional nuclear rocket into space, with a chance of a launch radiation disaster, became too high an issue. Today would use a large chemical rocket to deliver the nuclear engine to LEO, and separately transport its fuel rods. Assembled them in space to avoid any launching issues. It's current plan in 2027 is to prove they can accelerate a "small" probe from LEO to the outer solar system. Any Mars missions would require a much larger system.
It's not exactly cheap to make innovations in rockets. Also, a lot of things you use in your daily life exist because of space innovation. Lastly, the NTP they are funding is innovation, no?
Finally someone is talking nuclear engines. Cut with the B S about chemical rockets. No way can we reach other planets and stay there without nuclear. I’m sure friends of the earth would it be against it even though nuclear material would exit the planet and never come back.😅
No way NASA can accomplish something like that. SpaceX, yeah probably. But NASA is too much of a bureaucracy to really accomplish anything significant any more.
Right, because we have it SOOO hard. For the first time in human history we have running safe water, decent sanitation, food all around us, heated and cooled buildings, free entertainment 24/7 and the ability to ask (freely) for any information in the universe. We no longer die of scores of diseases and are so burdened we find time to spend an average of 7 hours/day in front of a screen. Tough life.
fact is at such as speed there would be bloody mush with g force lol we are not very dense but force is so this is another pipe dream you could use it for supplies and robots but people be there some time later if theres no accedents caused by human error lol
I still think flipping four or more electrostatic ?! WAIT! that will come later Err-electromagnetic fields "Sections" strategically to provide enough velocity in any X, Y or Z direction as long as a nuclear generator is allowed, all it needs is enough energy ergo repulsion to double respective sections flipped field to double it's previous velocity. The trick is tying the bulk of the sections electromagnetically so that the section being repulsed is accelerated the most towards the desired direction, to which once moving is strategically electromagnetically recombined as part of the main mass to move the following section that is then electromagnetically flipped and accelerated, similar to "Mag trains" only the Main mass is electromagnetically established and reconfigured on the fly so that three sections repulse one section forward. To which at some point, the fields polarity would have to then be strategically reconfigured for the respective sections to provide deacceleration. Also consider a minimum of 4 X 4 X 4 sections all up 64 sections" so that X, Y, & Z acceleration and deacceleration is possible. Yeah much like those UPA's that are utilising at the molecular level the atoms electrostatic fields, which are energised and manipulated using the energy of hydrogen, yeah our system won't be as sleek for some time, and they will still rely on our extremely crude nuclear understanding, but hey one day, we will drop the current archaic theories on theoretical particles, which will then open the flood gate to a new error in physics.
If a rocket gets to mars in one day, how many months does it take to get in an orbit (with people) from that speed, same with light speed, with 10g brake?
If The PPR has 100000N or 10tf thrust and exhaust velocity 50,000m/s then the plasma escapes from the magnetic nozzle in about 1/10,000 seconds (assuming the nozzle size is about 5m). If the pulse frequency is 1 Hz and that thrust of 10 tf the force is the baverage thrust over time, then the force on the ship from a single pulse would be 10000*10tf = 100000tf..!!?? On the other hand, if the 10tf is a force of a single pulse on the nozzle, then the average force would be about 10tf/10000 = 10N.
Where to even start. HALEU exists now, this is still a Newtonian design, hydrogen is notoriously difficult to store (ammonia is interesting). Ultimately, this is just using fission to add to the chemical heat to add to the impulse. And the addition of EM engines seems to feel like science fiction. Bring back the bosses that know that the Orion drive is the way to go for nuclear drives.
I heard such things many times. Unfortunately NASA nowadays can't make anything without subcontractors. Even their subcontractors can't make the things working as should. The biggest success is JSWT but it was postponed almost 10 years, and ate billions of dollars. Even during the launch, nobody was sure it will success for 100%.
To be fair space x isn’t even close to lunar missions much less mars. The amount of fuel the starship would require to get to the moon is staggering much less mars.
Your thoughts are correct. That organization is nothing more than a tax money sponge and star-liner and SLS is boondoggle. NASA is now a bureaucratic dinosaur who can even get old tech to function with out billions of dollars and decades of wasted effort.
No, I just modified the plan. Freight and supplies will be there waiting for the light weight passengers even leave to join it. This can ALL BE DONE after my flying inflatable Mars aircraft explorer's picks a location. I'd say, Olympus Mons size indicates that the cavern's under it are what? 1/3rd the size of the mountain?
No one will acknowledge this, because they don’t believe it, personally I think we are already visiting the Stars, with Secret Black Ops Craft, anti Gravity etc. They will not admit this however, they prefer to dumb us all down with traditional Rocket technology, and to convince us they haven’t yet, managed to discover alternative methods, some of us know better though don’t we?!!
@@japfourme381 I absolutely agree with you. We make it to the moon 55 years ago and the computing back then was less than the phones we have in our pocket!!! Either they lied to us and we didn't go to the moon or they have been lying to us since the 70s!!! 50 years later and we can't even reproduce what we did in the late 60s???! It actually breaks my heart!! I was a little kid in the 80s thinking by the year 2000 or so we would traveling through our solar system and by today (2024) I thought we would be close to stuff we seen in Sci Fi!!! Something doesn't add up! What if the auto industry did the same?? It'd a been unacceptable but yet we don't question NASA? Idk, I wish I was filthy rich because I'd fund it myself . There is something really advanced flying around our skies and I don't think it's aliens! I honestly think it's what you stated and it's black projects.
I would say to the pessimistic that a working reliable nuclear engine may be pie in the sky to you but the point is this. If you don't open this avenue and someone else does then you are stuffed because you will be displaced big time ! And left way behind. So make room for some optimisim because the future without any could be catastrophic !
A chemical rocket can get to Mars in only 6 months, not 9. It requires 10% more propellant than a 9 month trajectory. The rovers Spirit and Opportunity were delivered with 6 month transit time.
I'm all for increasing red tape in this area to restrict ANY POSSIBLE SPACE TRAVEL. Taking care of the earth, which we've never done is far more important than this bs.
It takes 1 minute.45 seconds to get to the word "could". My preference for TH-cam videos is they should be categorised. It happened in the past It happened today or recently It might happen in the future. - It might happen in the future. There is no working example and it could take anywhere from 1 to 1000 years to happen. I might develop a time machine to travel to Mars, there again I might not. Algorithm, please only serve me things which have been at least tested and you have a working prototype.
You are correct about radiation, but simple question : what is saving you from Sun's radiation? First Magnetic field of the Earth and Second Ozone layer, but mainly Magnetic field. So if your spaceship generates Magnetic field strong enough then you can exist in any kind of Medium.
@@semorgh2854 so the magnetic field of the the earth and the ozone layer protected any manned space travel in it?. And the Apollo rocket generated a strong enough magnetic field by using a chemical fuel?. In addition once you leave the belt you are open to the suns radiation and all stars radiation in the galaxy?. I realize that all the stars in galaxy would have a minuscule effect because they are far way but remember there are over 200 billion of them in our galaxy. Please explain. Thanks.
@@Comezehere Apollo rocket Never created any Magnetic field the Physical body of that rocket protected the astronomers. First of all I believe Aliens exist and their movement through the universe is with directional Magnetic field that they produce and that field interacts with Celestial entities of universe like Earth Moon, Sun and so on, this means Alien ships for example with Earth act like 2 Magnets (have you played with Magnets before?) , the Alien ship produces magnetic field that is the same polarity as North pole if the ship is in north pole to, this way the field of Earth throws the space ship away from north pole with a tremendous speed and if the spaceship is going to Mars it adjusts its magnetic field to opposite magnetic field of one of Mars poles so that Mars Pulls the spaceship. ----------- I hope I have explained enough. one other fact about real spaceships as you may have seen one is that they do not eject any burned fuel that is because they use Plasma in Liquid form which when you spin that plasma that is what creates Magnetic field around the ship and acts like a magnet and that field is as strong as Earth magnetic field which protects the spaceship from any kinds of Rays like Beta and Gama rays. the spinning plasma is PARAmagnetic which gets activated and grows its field as it SPINs, that is the reason they do not produce any SOUND and if they get close to you, you only hear the electrical motors that spin the plasma reactors. ---------------- in the videos that you see spaceships act like a magnet when they move near Earth and in fact they actually slide with in the atmosphere because they are interacting with Earth Magnetic field , Like 2 Magnets of the same pole when you take them close to each other they give you the feeling like they are sliding against each other.
Mars is much harder than going to the North Pole. StarShip is the best way to get there and one big problem is fuel. It's going to take SpaceX 9 StarShip launches to refill 1 Starship to make it to Mars. That means to put a mission to Mars, it will take an armada of StarShips to make the trip. An armada of 25 ships. That means 225 Starship launches. At about 40 million dollars per launch, it's going to cost 9 billion dollars just to fuel a mission.
All this sounds good on paper, but creating the real thing will take much time and a lot of money before it comes operational. This happening in 2 or 3 years I don't see happening. More like 5-10 years or more. There is also the problem if the nuclear engine does not make orbit. What then? The other thing is we cannot send humans on a mission where the thrust exceeds 1 gravity. More than that would harm a normal human. Even at one gravity a mission to Mars will take more than a few days unless someone comes up with a way to cancel gravity. Only then could we push a space ship faster.
Being able to maintain a constant 1g acceleration would be ideal, because that would mimic surface gravity on Earth. It wouldn't be harmful to the astronauts at all. However, I'll only believe NASA has built such an engine when they successfully test fly one.
Mass does not attract mass. There is no gravitational pull. Gravity, as a force, is stationary plane physics. For every action, there is sn equal and opposite reaction. F=ma. To accelerate mass forward, you need to accelerate mass backward. Gravity is the resistance of the mass to being accelerated. What is being done to neutralize the acceleration in Time that takes place along with acceleration in space.
I'm sorry but your CLICK BAIT Headline is truly pathetic considering we have two astronauts stuck on the ISS because the damn ship has a bunch of problems. Why would anyone believe this?
Great, it should only take about 6 months for them to Burn thru $100 M, where will the funds to research and build it, and then need more funding to complete.
Russians already have a better solution for small nuclear engines and the prototype for the Marsian Express. The major problem is the radiation of biological passengers.
Most missions will be cargo which don't need fast transit times. A Mars colony needs frequent high mass cargo runs. SpaceX is geared for this. They will have a million tons of cargo on Mars before NASAs nuclear ship delivers one.
@@Hotrumor uurgh. Very well. Allow me to rephrase the question. "Are these to be crewed vessels and if so would it be possible to endure to endure that kind of acceleration/ deceleration combination. Perhaps with something akin to the water chambers in; Event Horizon, or is it an impossibility at this moment in time." ?
@@jonbutcher9805 The projects in this video are about engine designs not a ship configuration, but yeah a ship using these could be manned. It would not have dangerously high acceleration.
can you possibly stop spouting COMPLETE bullshit? Do you know just how much a fraction of light's speed you'd have to be going to make it to mars in a DAY? Id love to know what kind of Fantasy material this ship is made of as a structural engineer. I've always loved vehicles made of Unobtanium. To make it in a day, thats 0.5% the speed of light.. or roughtly 5.4MILLION kilometers per hour AVERAGE speed, Remember half the time would have to be spent slowing back down. earth to the moon the fastest mission to date was about 40,000 kph. 135x faster? .. sorry. not happening. That number is also ONLY if earth is at its closest point to mars.
1.4 million miles per hour. And in a vacuum a beer can can theoretically withstand what friction would be imposed on the structure. Aluminum should be good enough. Not a imagined material from science fiction 😂
Oho boy the NERVA nuclear rocket project of the 50's 60's again we have a nuclear wasteland at jackass flats in nevada from those days the engine spitting fuel rods out the tail pipe and regular explosions they finally got working well sort of project rover was smaller but still this is nothing new and you need tons of shielding from the naked reactor spewing gamma rays on the crew thats heavy good luck stay out of my town with this one skippy 😊
With all this new technology, we have why can’t we have solar powered rockets? Would that be possible? The sun could give us power all the way to Pluto with solar power have a back up from windMills on the Rockets also fuel.
Plenty of barren landscapes her on earth, no point in squandering billions for a risky manned mission when robotic landers have already shown us what is there.
@jackman5840 Id seriously dawt you would want to go and be one of the first people on Mars mate. It has literally fuck all on it. And you would be theirs for years. Probably even die their In ur inflatable tent and a rocket sat at the side of you with no fuel. Good luck
I am a long-time NASA employee, long retired. It is very painful to see how incompetence now rules at NASA.
There will be hundreds of Starships on Mars before NASAs nuclear powered ship gets there for the first time. Most Starship trips will be cargo anyway where it doesn't really matter how long the trip takes as long as there is a steady stream of ships going to Mars to establish a supply chain. SpaceX has had over 100 launches in the last 12 months. SLS is targeting one per year. The nuclear Mars ship will probably only go to Mars every 2-4 years. You can't build a supply chain that way.
I think dilithium crystal propulsion needs to develop. Warp speed baby.
Elon Musk will get to Mars 10 years before NASA has a working prototype.
@@cruzin6123 the only way we will reach Mars in our lifetime is Elon musk NASA will ride it out forever 😂😂😂all that government funding going to waist
I sure as hell hope Boeing did not play any part in this new money pit.
You took the words right out of my mouth
A nuclear fusion engine will not likely be an efficient launch engine, however, a Space X rocket could ferry a nuclear propulsion capable Mars craft into space where it could propel the space craft to speeds unseen. It would be wise to send several drone rockets to mars in advance with supplies, emergency supplies parts and electronics.
Project NERVA, proposed and demonstrated a nuclear engine during the late 1950s. It worked exceedingly well.
The fear of launching a fully functional nuclear rocket into space, with a chance of a launch radiation disaster, became too high an issue.
Today would use a large chemical rocket to deliver the nuclear engine to LEO, and separately transport its fuel rods. Assembled them in space to avoid any launching issues.
It's current plan in 2027 is to prove they can accelerate a "small" probe from LEO to the outer solar system.
Any Mars missions would require a much larger system.
NASA 😂. This is funny, not in business for innovation, but job security and a never ending government funding
There is a strong balance between national security and real national scientific capability… unfortunately SpaceX is not part of that equation 😂😂😂
SLS is program is distributed nationally to spread the money around.
It's not exactly cheap to make innovations in rockets.
Also, a lot of things you use in your daily life exist because of space innovation.
Lastly, the NTP they are funding is innovation, no?
@@Cmdr_DarkNite especially when the organization is being run by a bunch of bureaucrats
Finally someone is talking nuclear engines. Cut with the B S about chemical rockets. No way can we reach other planets and stay there without nuclear. I’m sure friends of the earth would it be against it even though nuclear material would exit the planet and never come back.😅
No way NASA can accomplish something like that. SpaceX, yeah probably. But NASA is too much of a bureaucracy to really accomplish anything significant any more.
I'm ready to go to mars right now ! Anything is better than trying to live on this planet these days !!
Right, because we have it SOOO hard. For the first time in human history we have running safe water, decent sanitation, food all around us, heated and cooled buildings, free entertainment 24/7 and the ability to ask (freely) for any information in the universe. We no longer die of scores of diseases and are so burdened we find time to spend an average of 7 hours/day in front of a screen. Tough life.
fact is at such as speed there would be bloody mush with g force lol we are not very dense but force is so this is another pipe dream you could use it for supplies and robots but people be there some time later if theres no accedents caused by human error lol
With Starliner and the Hubble Telescope fiasco, 'heads are going to roll'
Good luck getting the FAA bureaucracy to sign off on any of this.
How can I contact you? Thanks!
I still think flipping four or more electrostatic ?! WAIT! that will come later Err-electromagnetic
fields "Sections" strategically to provide enough velocity in any X, Y or Z direction as long as
a nuclear generator is allowed, all it needs is enough energy ergo repulsion to double
respective sections flipped field to double it's previous velocity. The trick is tying the bulk of
the sections electromagnetically so that the section being repulsed is accelerated the most
towards the desired direction, to which once moving is strategically electromagnetically
recombined as part of the main mass to move the following section that is then
electromagnetically flipped and accelerated, similar to "Mag trains" only the Main mass is
electromagnetically established and reconfigured on the fly so that three sections repulse one
section forward.
To which at some point, the fields polarity would have to then be strategically reconfigured for
the respective sections to provide deacceleration.
Also consider a minimum of 4 X 4 X 4 sections all up 64 sections" so that X, Y, & Z acceleration
and deacceleration is possible.
Yeah much like those UPA's that are utilising at the molecular level the atoms electrostatic fields,
which are energised and manipulated using the energy of hydrogen, yeah our system won't be
as sleek for some time, and they will still rely on our extremely crude nuclear understanding, but
hey one day, we will drop the current archaic theories on theoretical particles, which will then
open the flood gate to a new error in physics.
If a rocket gets to mars in one day, how many months does it take to get in an orbit (with people) from that speed, same with light speed, with 10g brake?
They can't even bring back the ones who are in orbit right now...
If The PPR has 100000N or 10tf thrust and exhaust velocity 50,000m/s then the plasma escapes from the magnetic nozzle in about 1/10,000 seconds (assuming the nozzle size is about 5m). If the pulse frequency is 1 Hz and that thrust of 10 tf the force is the baverage thrust over time, then the force on the ship from a single pulse would be 10000*10tf = 100000tf..!!?? On the other hand, if the 10tf is a force of a single pulse on the nozzle, then the average force would be about 10tf/10000 = 10N.
As long as Boeing isn't building it 😂
Blue Origin will miss the deadline by years.
YES! Nuclear is the FUTURE!
And of course Blue Origin wont be ready until 2040........... and beyond
Where to even start. HALEU exists now, this is still a Newtonian design, hydrogen is notoriously difficult to store (ammonia is interesting). Ultimately, this is just using fission to add to the chemical heat to add to the impulse. And the addition of EM engines seems to feel like science fiction. Bring back the bosses that know that the Orion drive is the way to go for nuclear drives.
Very interesting.
Based on past history we are looking at 10 yrs ofcounrt cases to get initial launch approval.
I heard such things many times. Unfortunately NASA nowadays can't make anything without subcontractors. Even their subcontractors can't make the things working as should. The biggest success is JSWT but it was postponed almost 10 years, and ate billions of dollars. Even during the launch, nobody was sure it will success for 100%.
I believe it when i see it.
It takes mass to move mass. All you're changing is the speed of the mass. And not by much.
Good point if you overlook the obvious.
Freight is in NO HURRY TO GET THERE. I just shared instructions on how to get PEOPLE THERE FAST AND SAFELY.
To be fair space x isn’t even close to lunar missions much less mars. The amount of fuel the starship would require to get to the moon is staggering much less mars.
Wishing Could See This Work Thanks for the Fantasy my Friend
NASA Will go back to the moon 2075 and go to Mars 2095 😂😂😂
Time frame of 2026, so with NASA involved should happen if at all by 2046
Your thoughts are correct. That organization is nothing more than a tax money sponge and star-liner and SLS is boondoggle. NASA is now a bureaucratic dinosaur who can even get old tech to function with out billions of dollars and decades of wasted effort.
@tedjones-ho2zk: My friend you made a typeo, thats ok I just corrected it. 2146, Your welcome.
@@Sparky056 Thank you, even 2146 may be a little optimistic.
No, I just modified the plan. Freight and supplies will be there waiting for the light weight passengers even leave to join it. This can ALL BE DONE after my flying inflatable Mars aircraft explorer's picks a location. I'd say, Olympus Mons size indicates that the cavern's under it are what?
1/3rd the size of the mountain?
Whats wrong with the Tr3bs and the other antigravity space craftwe already have.
No one will acknowledge this, because they don’t believe it, personally I think we are already visiting the Stars, with Secret Black Ops Craft, anti Gravity etc. They will not admit this however, they prefer to dumb us all down with traditional Rocket technology, and to convince us they haven’t yet, managed to discover alternative methods, some of us know better though don’t we?!!
What happened to the NERVA engine?
@@japfourme381 I absolutely agree with you. We make it to the moon 55 years ago and the computing back then was less than the phones we have in our pocket!!! Either they lied to us and we didn't go to the moon or they have been lying to us since the 70s!!! 50 years later and we can't even reproduce what we did in the late 60s???! It actually breaks my heart!! I was a little kid in the 80s thinking by the year 2000 or so we would traveling through our solar system and by today (2024) I thought we would be close to stuff we seen in Sci Fi!!! Something doesn't add up! What if the auto industry did the same?? It'd a been unacceptable but yet we don't question NASA? Idk, I wish I was filthy rich because I'd fund it myself . There is something really advanced flying around our skies and I don't think it's aliens! I honestly think it's what you stated and it's black projects.
Perfekt! We have in future for rocket to mars …. . We hope your . 🤩😊🚀 nice 👍🏼
Yes we are.
Elon is opening the new hope for humanity
@@alphatech4966yeah !
Why not figure out how to get your crew back from the space station first.
You are spreading disinformation- shhhhh
NASA??? Lol. NASA can't even get off the ground. When they do they can't get home.
They can't get a capsule back from the ISS. How are they going to beat Spacex to mars?
100%
We need to give it a try. If it turns out to be true. Right on. It would be cool to go to mars and return. After a time.
Blue origin can't even get a conventual rocket into orbit...
@MrRich2u: Straight up, and fall back down. Just need to get those pesly parachuites to all work together.
I would say to the pessimistic that a working reliable nuclear engine may be pie in the sky to you but the point is this. If you don't open this avenue and someone else does then you are stuffed because you will be displaced big time ! And left way behind. So make room for some optimisim because the future without any could be catastrophic !
A chemical rocket can get to Mars in only 6 months, not 9. It requires 10% more propellant than a 9 month trajectory. The rovers Spirit and Opportunity were delivered with 6 month transit time.
Not a chance.by the time nasa gets to mars, Elon will be out to Neptune. Too much government fat in that organization.
I'm all for increasing red tape in this area to restrict ANY POSSIBLE SPACE TRAVEL. Taking care of the earth, which we've never done is far more important than this bs.
They just need to release the technology that we already have 0. Energy spaceships
Says the same agency that has the Starliner at the ISS.
Nasa can't get their Space Craft off of the Space Station.
It takes 1 minute.45 seconds to get to the word "could". My preference for TH-cam videos is they should be categorised.
It happened in the past
It happened today or recently
It might happen in the future. - It might happen in the future. There is no working example and it could take anywhere from 1 to 1000 years to happen.
I might develop a time machine to travel to Mars, there again I might not. Algorithm, please only serve me things which have been at least tested and you have a working prototype.
SpaceX is excluded from developing a nuclear high speed deep space engine? Blue Origin is included? Sounds like politics to me.
Good luck surviving the Van Allen Radiation Belt.😂
You are correct about radiation, but simple question : what is saving you from Sun's radiation? First Magnetic field of the Earth and Second Ozone layer, but mainly Magnetic field. So if your spaceship generates Magnetic field strong enough then you can exist in any kind of Medium.
@@semorgh2854 so the magnetic field of the the earth and the ozone layer protected any manned space travel in it?. And the Apollo rocket generated a strong enough magnetic field by using a chemical fuel?. In addition once you leave the belt you are open to the suns radiation and all stars radiation in the galaxy?. I realize that all the stars in galaxy would have a minuscule effect because they are far way but remember there are over 200 billion of them in our galaxy. Please explain. Thanks.
@@Comezehere Apollo rocket Never created any Magnetic field the Physical body of that rocket protected the astronomers. First of all I believe Aliens exist and their movement through the universe is with directional Magnetic field that they produce and that field interacts with Celestial entities of universe like Earth Moon, Sun and so on, this means Alien ships for example with Earth act like 2 Magnets (have you played with Magnets before?) , the Alien ship produces magnetic field that is the same polarity as North pole if the ship is in north pole to, this way the field of Earth throws the space ship away from north pole with a tremendous speed and if the spaceship is going to Mars it adjusts its magnetic field to opposite magnetic field of one of Mars poles so that Mars Pulls the spaceship. ----------- I hope I have explained enough. one other fact about real spaceships as you may have seen one is that they do not eject any burned fuel that is because they use Plasma in Liquid form which when you spin that plasma that is what creates Magnetic field around the ship and acts like a magnet and that field is as strong as Earth magnetic field which protects the spaceship from any kinds of Rays like Beta and Gama rays. the spinning plasma is PARAmagnetic which gets activated and grows its field as it SPINs, that is the reason they do not produce any SOUND and if they get close to you, you only hear the electrical motors that spin the plasma reactors. ---------------- in the videos that you see spaceships act like a magnet when they move near Earth and in fact they actually slide with in the atmosphere because they are interacting with Earth Magnetic field , Like 2 Magnets of the same pole when you take them close to each other they give you the feeling like they are sliding against each other.
I’ll believe it when I see it.
"...visit Mars in day (sic)."
Keep Boeing out of this.
I second that motion
The planets line up on the same side of the sun only every 2 years so return is 2 years after arrival.
This will never while NASA is in charge. It’s taken them a decade to get SLS in the sky..
Mars is much harder than going to the North Pole. StarShip is the best way to get there and one big problem is fuel. It's going to take SpaceX 9 StarShip launches to refill 1 Starship to make it to Mars. That means to put a mission to Mars, it will take an armada of StarShips to make the trip. An armada of 25 ships. That means 225 Starship launches. At about 40 million dollars per launch, it's going to cost 9 billion dollars just to fuel a mission.
Thank you for your comment!
@@alphatech4966 You are welcome!
What’s nine bil when your trying to colonize a new planet
All this sounds good on paper, but creating the real thing will take much time and a lot of money before it comes operational. This happening in 2 or 3 years I don't see happening. More like 5-10 years or more. There is also the problem if the nuclear engine does not make orbit. What then? The other thing is we cannot send humans on a mission where the thrust exceeds 1 gravity. More than that would harm a normal human. Even at one gravity a mission to Mars will take more than a few days unless someone comes up with a way to cancel gravity. Only then could we push a space ship faster.
Being able to maintain a constant 1g acceleration would be ideal, because that would mimic surface gravity on Earth. It wouldn't be harmful to the astronauts at all.
However, I'll only believe NASA has built such an engine when they successfully test fly one.
You want to give NASA a bomb disguised as a motor????? ARE YOU NUTS?
Now wait a minute what are the coordinates to Biden’s house
Nuclear-Salt water rocket is the only sensible solution for interplanetary flying...
good.
Yes in about 50 years
Mass does not attract mass. There is no gravitational pull. Gravity, as a force, is stationary plane physics.
For every action, there is sn equal and opposite reaction.
F=ma. To accelerate mass forward, you need to accelerate mass backward.
Gravity is the resistance of the mass to being accelerated. What is being done to neutralize the acceleration in Time that takes place along with acceleration in space.
Mars is hostile…Bill Nelson should go 🎉
Hell they can't even get back to earth
@richardhoutman5261: awe, Boeing. Always a good laugh.
Did I miss something? Does someone have a net positive fusion reactor? If not a rocket that presumes to utilize one is a pipe dream.
Nuclear thermal and nuclear electric is not fusion nor is it claiming to be
its pronounced, dray-co. not dra-co.
Thanks for the correction, We will all sleep better tonight.
@@Sparky056 i knwo its not a big deal but it annoys me when ppl mispronounce easy to pronounce words
It’s also disrespectful to pronounce a person’s name wrong. The AI voice pronounces Suni Williams name ‘Sue-nee’ instead of ‘Sun-nee’.
They will only be showing a demonstration by 2027… that is 3 years… not to mention any form of actual production…
Ok game over for SpaceX , but let's try pick up your guys from the international space station first NASA.
"The Expanse" but for real...
Trust me on this any noteworthy breakthroughs will happen in the private sector.
I'm sorry but your CLICK BAIT Headline is truly pathetic considering we have two astronauts stuck on the ISS because the damn ship has a bunch of problems. Why would anyone believe this?
Great, it should only take about 6 months for them to Burn thru $100 M, where will the funds to research and build it, and then need more funding to complete.
NASA has a terrible track record for spaceflight in at least the last quarter century. I won't hold my breath waiting.
Just dont let Boeing have anything to do with it
Russians already have a better solution for small nuclear engines and the prototype for the Marsian Express. The major problem is the radiation of biological passengers.
Most missions will be cargo which don't need fast transit times. A Mars colony needs frequent high mass cargo runs. SpaceX is geared for this. They will have a million tons of cargo on Mars before NASAs nuclear ship delivers one.
We will never go to Mars . We will never go back to the Moon either
found the bot!
You’re clueless…
Amonia rockets ? PISS POWERD ROCKETS....F**CK Yah lets goooo...😁
NASA needs a new Stanley Cubric, help nasa put people on the moon again. .
This is misleading. Space X can go to Mars in 3 months not 9!
with nuclear fusion we cant achieve even 2 persent of light speed
Hey, what about the people stuck in space
Just ask AI
Are these going to be with fragile humans on board and wouldn't it be impossible to endure that kind of speed.
Speed doesn't matter acceleration does
@@Hotrumor uurgh. Very well. Allow me to rephrase the question. "Are these to be crewed vessels and if so would it be possible to endure to endure that kind of acceleration/ deceleration combination. Perhaps with something akin to the water chambers in; Event Horizon, or is it an impossibility at this moment in time." ?
@@jonbutcher9805 The projects in this video are about engine designs not a ship configuration, but yeah a ship using these could be manned. It would not have dangerously high acceleration.
can you possibly stop spouting COMPLETE bullshit? Do you know just how much a fraction of light's speed you'd have to be going to make it to mars in a DAY? Id love to know what kind of Fantasy material this ship is made of as a structural engineer. I've always loved vehicles made of Unobtanium. To make it in a day, thats 0.5% the speed of light.. or roughtly 5.4MILLION kilometers per hour AVERAGE speed, Remember half the time would have to be spent slowing back down. earth to the moon the fastest mission to date was about 40,000 kph. 135x faster? .. sorry. not happening. That number is also ONLY if earth is at its closest point to mars.
1.4 million miles per hour. And in a vacuum a beer can can theoretically withstand what friction would be imposed on the structure. Aluminum should be good enough. Not a imagined material from science fiction 😂
Remember all you need are experiments, videos and announcements, Hollywood does the rest.
500 times the mach speed to travel to Mars in 10 days, (600,000 km/h). 😁😁
Yeah! Thanks
NASA can’t manage a round trip to the Space Station. They are done.
Yeah!
I don't know why you would say NASA and not Boeing.
How did Blue Origin get in on this. Must have only been to keep Bozo happy.
why
Oho boy the NERVA nuclear rocket project of the 50's 60's again we have a nuclear wasteland at jackass flats in nevada from those days the engine spitting fuel rods out the tail pipe and regular explosions they finally got working well sort of project rover was smaller but still this is nothing new and you need tons of shielding from the naked reactor spewing gamma rays on the crew thats heavy good luck stay out of my town with this one skippy 😊
Pretty sure this is not that.
@@Yusuke_Dentonuntil something goes wrong
@@Magic-mushrooms113 He's not talking about the same kind of engine the video is talking about.
@@Yusuke_Denton interesting
With all this new technology, we have why can’t we have solar powered rockets? Would that be possible? The sun could give us power all the way to Pluto with solar power have a back up from windMills on the Rockets also fuel.
Solar works the closer to the Sun you go. Mars is further away so is less efficient. As for windmills, I'm assuming you are joking.
The worst thing you can do is include pics of that old Dem Nelson in your thumbnails.
I'll believe all this great tek when it's lit in space.. So. Far it's all been studies and no real usable teck
140 million miles...the sun is 93 million
Plenty of barren landscapes her on earth, no point in squandering billions for a risky manned mission when robotic landers have already shown us what is there.
Does Nasa Ever stop lying?
Yeah, this is going to be scrapped!🙄
Never gonna happen
BS…Baloney and ALL of the above ‼️😱‼️
Never work
The grandchildren of the children born this year most likey will not see it. But WTH, we will all be dust by then, Yay
So, is Boeing building this albatross? Did a great job on the starship.
Nobody's going to Mars why would you
let me translate "I'm an idiot clown"
@jackman5840 Id seriously dawt you would want to go and be one of the first people on Mars mate. It has literally fuck all on it. And you would be theirs for years. Probably even die their In ur inflatable tent and a rocket sat at the side of you with no fuel. Good luck