I certainly like that idea of “learning only to create,” and personally I don’t tend to remember ideas that I don’t create something out of. For me at least, there is something about the act of “pushing out” that paradoxically helps drive ideas “deeper in.” As always, the course sounds outstanding.
Kant has always been very complex, more than I can understand, and part of that was trying to grapple with so much in the 18th century. Grappling in a complete way but with yet limited information (as is always the case, but maybe more dramatically via Kant's scope). As Johannes states, his role was an opening, or a hinge that opens, to new avenues of thought. Between the empiricists, the rationalists, and with the history of greek philosophy and christian thought. Prior to the insights of anthropology/human origins, prior to the psychology of the unconscious, prior to the biology of genetics and dna. Trying to force sense on the confused space between the phenomenal and the noumenal - trying to do the impossible, yet ever pushing and searching ahead. So this is brilliant and brave trying to return each thinker to Kant in a comparative contract, as part of the everlasting journey of critique and innovations of thought.
How can one reconcile opposites? What is there to reconcile? And what do you mean by reconcile? 0 is 0 and 1 is 1 on is on and off is off alive is alive and dead is dead
![[UNCUT] The Loyal Pin ปิ่นภักดิ์ EP.4 (4/4)](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/d3l5rxl5CVo/mqdefault.jpg)
I certainly like that idea of “learning only to create,” and personally I don’t tend to remember ideas that I don’t create something out of. For me at least, there is something about the act of “pushing out” that paradoxically helps drive ideas “deeper in.” As always, the course sounds outstanding.
Danke fuer alles! Interessant Idees
Wow…kindred spirits all! I found a reliable course. I am studying how German idealism applies to educational theory. Excited to be here.
You’ll find a link in the description of this video where you can download the study guide for the course.
Kant has always been very complex, more than I can understand, and part of that was trying to grapple with so much in the 18th century. Grappling in a complete way but with yet limited information (as is always the case, but maybe more dramatically via Kant's scope). As Johannes states, his role was an opening, or a hinge that opens, to new avenues of thought. Between the empiricists, the rationalists, and with the history of greek philosophy and christian thought. Prior to the insights of anthropology/human origins, prior to the psychology of the unconscious, prior to the biology of genetics and dna. Trying to force sense on the confused space between the phenomenal and the noumenal - trying to do the impossible, yet ever pushing and searching ahead. So this is brilliant and brave trying to return each thinker to Kant in a comparative contract, as part of the everlasting journey of critique and innovations of thought.
Everyone should take this one!
Thank you! 15 enrolled already
Thank u for this, just found your videos and going on a journey lol
Enjoy the ride
Very exciting and thought provoking!
Thank you! Our next course will be on Hegel
@@JohannesNiederhauser You are welcome. I will try to participate but I am not sure. In the long run I will be regular to follow your course.
Great intro!
Thanks!
Looking fwd
Cheers!
🧠 🔥
Interesting to suggest creation is the role of man. This is alarming if technology starts to do that more and more.
Precisely! Very good observation. Also, the way in which one has to write papers at University is increasingly mechanical, machine-like.
How can one reconcile opposites? What is there to reconcile? And what do you mean by reconcile? 0 is 0 and 1 is 1 on is on and off is off alive is alive and dead is dead
How do even know any of those are opposites without reconciling them?
Think for myself? 🤔
🤔
🤔
🤔 deez nuts.
No I won’t be thinking for myself anymore 😌