Thank you Mr Nolan for everything you have given to movie history and to us , audiences around the world. Cinema is not understood in the 21 st century without Christopher Nolan movies. There are not enough awards to thank your contribution to movie making . Thank you for so much. October 21, 2023.
Unrelated but I don’t get why redditors like to accuse people of being Nolan meat riders just for liking his films. Like it doesn’t matter if they are pretentious or try to be too smart. I’d rather have a film that’s too smart than too stupid
Great video, but I feel like it is missing out on one of the key aspects that elevate Nolan's movies to the next level: his exceptional, mind-bending plot writing. His stories are incredibly detailed, original and planned out to perfection, almost always containing at least one unexpected twist that so many movies nowadays lack. Complaints about his stories being too complex are simply a result of a lack of attention during his movies imo.
I'd agree with all of that except how his stories are really complex, being honest. People always say they had to watch his movies twice or thrice before understanding, and I've never once watched any of them more than once. Every movie has a well structured story that is self explanatory on the first watch, and I'd only ever agree that maybe Memento may have had a few people re-watching. And even more, Inception is revered so much despite just being very much "inspired" by Paprika (the colors, scenes, direction, etc.) and the Japanese novel Paprika was adapted from, and I feel Inception was inferior in originality comparatively to those two, and nowhere near as good as Nolan's other movies, except TENET (which didn't feel much like a Nolan's movie either).
@@Gr8GooseTH-cam Before you talk about reading poetry twice, at least read my comment fully once. It's literally explaining that the movies aren't complex enough to only be understood on a re-watch. It's just a matter of paying attention and comprehension. I know it's such a shocker that you require media literacy to understand the media you consume, right?
@@TheZynec I’m agreeing with you, I’m just saying sometimes people have to read poetry twice, it’s a sign of good writing. I’m not trying to correct you or argue with you, I am simply adding to the discussion. Don’t jump to conclusions, but thanks for the long paragraph.
@charlesburns7391 I struggle to hear dialog in his films quite frequently. I don't hate him for it, and I think there are times when environmental and background noise are more important than dialog, but I often struggle to hear what the actors are saying. I don't hare Christopher Nolan for this, but everyone processes audio and dialog differently, which is something to consider. The fact that it's a know topic regarding CN films indicates that this may be an issue for some viewers, and others' opinions may be perceived as inconsiderate and apathetic
Its largely boring dotted with a few interesting scenes with a very loud score to cover. Contact from 1997 is a far more interesting movie with a similar run time.
Tenet remains one of Nolan’s best movies, endlessly questioned by people who didn’t pay enough attention to it. The Protagonist from the very first mission we see him in, is established that he will divert from the mission for the sake of saving people. He does succeed in the main objective in the Opera, but he also takes it upon himself to save the civilians in the crowd as well. As soon as he returns from his coma, the first thing he asks is whether his team made it out. When he hears they didn’t, he cries. From the get go we realize he will do whatever is necessary for his missions, but that he also cares for people and will deviate from his main objective to save lives. Nolan doesn’t have an exposition problem. Audiences have simply proven themselves to require spoon feeding information, and Tenet’s unfair backlash is a prime example.
I never understood this sound issue people have with his films. English is not my mother tongue, but I watched Tenet and Oppenheimer in The Netherlands, without speaking a word of Dutch, so the captions didn't help whatsoever, and understood everything just fine
This was a fantastic video. Broke down what makes Nolan great with clear examples and also showed with examples the legitimate criticisms people have with his work. Outstanding stuff. Educational, entertaining, and informative.
Honestly, i don't see Nolan as a director that focuses on characters more than the plot, while i do love the plot and story he gives us, just wish he could focus on the characters more so we could actually connect with the characters. That's my opinion though
The horns in Inception are actually the horns in Edith Piaf's "Non, je ne regrette rien", (theme song of the movie) but played 7 times slower, as if you were hearing it from a different dream layer.
awesome video! very insightful and informative. In regard to his sound mixing... I do agree that it is very hard to understand at times, but he made a great point in an interview a while ago. He basically said that it's intentional because he considers dialogue to be not the focal point of his scenes, he prefers all other sound over the dialogue. What I gathered from him saying that was it is basically a "you'll figure it out" situation. And I usually find that upon rewatches I understand it way more. Denis Villeneuve works similarly with (lack of) dialogue in his movies. All that to say, I totally still understand why people are annoyed by not being able to hear haha it's totally valid. The other thing I've noticed about his storytelling is that a lot of his plot points are very subtle. For example the motivation of Sator in Tenet that you mentioned... he has a line directed toward his wife in the movie "If I can't have you, then nobody can". I think that line right there mostly explains his motivation for ending the world (as odd as it may be, but alas, he's the antagonist).
Within the first minute, saying most of Hollywood relies on Hollywood tent pole movies using previously established intellectual properties, and showing Batman, then calling Nolan an outlier. He directed three Batman movies. I love Nolan movies and this was a good video. Just thought that was funny.
I'm not overly impressed with that VOX article you quoted. It mistakenly assumes what the film Tenet is trying to say, and then criticizes the film for failing, rather than even considering whether the initial assumption might be wrong. I feel like there's a phenomenon in modern film appreciation that I think amounts to jumping on bandwagons. There's so much discourse, so many emotionally charged hot takes, that once an opinion takes hold in the public arena, a veritable mob emerges, ready to die on that hill. When The Last Jedi came out, critics for the most part thoroughly enjoyed the way it examined and deepened the Star Wars universe. But once the mob took over the discourse, no one wanted to discuss it in the face of emotional "fans" coming out of the woodwork to proclaim, yet again, it had destroyed Star Wars. So discourse vanished, leaving the least considered, most emotionally reactionary opinion as the last word on the subject. The same seems true for Tenet. After it proved to be its own thing, and not the new Inception, everyone had a hot take on what they think it's supposed to be, and how it fails. In particular, it's assumed that the connection between the protagonist and Kat is romantic in nature. Of course, because it's Nolan's take on James Bond, what else should it be? But in fact, this is anything but the case. Everyone is wrapped up trying to follow all the details of the dialog, and getting frustrated when it's unclear, while simultaneously criticizing Nolan's reliance on dialog-heavy exposition rather than character development. Meanwhile, the real story plays out in the actions. The protagonist cockily appears in Kat's life as a savior, and then promptly puts her in mortal danger. But he doesn't really seem aware of how cavalier he's been with her life while playing his spy games. Not until she rakes him over the coals for it, shattering his self-image as a smooth action hero. Suddenly, he's no longer strutting around as he did earlier in the film. He's trying to fix his mistakes, taking risks to protect her, and ultimately, rebuilds his whole mission around saving her life, because after all, he's the one who put it in danger. Ultimately, the point of the whole story is "What does it mean to save the world if you don't care about the people?" As for Sator's threat to destroy the world, that's not the real stakes. The stakes come down to Sator's philosophy that the world is meaningless, vs the protagonist's desire to find meaning in it. If no one matters to the protagonist, if he's only saving a hypothetical whole world and not a particular person, then saving the world doesn't really matter to him anymore than it matters to Sator. The whole film is a philosophical debate about the need for faith in the real, objective existence of other people. Sator's stance, stated plainly at the end, is that he doesn't believe in anything or anyone beyond his own experience. So it doesn't matter to him that it all ceases to exist. "If I can't have you, no one can." That's the philosophy of solipsism, the belief that the universe can't be proven to exist beyond one's own experience of it. It's the ultimate narcissistic belief, the locked room from which there's no escape, because it can't be disproved. To escape it requires faith, and true empathy. Ultimately, the protagonist's determination to save Kat is his expression of empathy for her, something he didn't give thought to in the beginning. So in the same way, it doesn't matter that we don't know Kat's son, whether he's a good kid or a bad one. Kat's motivation isn't about his qualities. It's about Kat's absolute love for him regardless. That's what motherhood means, but it's also a demonstration of faith that inspires the protagonist. She models for him the love without judgement he should feel for humanity as a whole, especially if he's going to lay down his life for it. All this is right there in the film if you stop worrying about timelines, stop trying to tease out the puzzle. That's the point of the film, to be presented with a complex problem that's nearly impossible to unravel, until you realize that unraveling the puzzle was never the point. The point is to save the Kat.
The relationship in Tenent doesn’t need much beyond “Mother wants to be with her child”. The protagonist is in a position to achieve his goals and actually help. She tells us he’s purposefully keeping him from her and damaging their relationship, so the distance we see as the audience makes sense because it imitates how the mother feels herself. As for Sator, we often have to react in the real world to others with knowing the full scope of their motivations. Like the other complaint it would feel out of place to have him monologue an explanation in full detail. People who are truly set on ending their life have few words left and we see this behavior. And to visibly show the stakes would feel cheap and preachy given the current political climate. Many of the other claims are 100% valid imo. Tenet seemed to be an exercise in seeing how much the director could get away with in terms of conveying a narrative experience mostly through the experience.
I don't know whu but I can't help but to compare and align Nolan's movies and Hideo's video games. I got the best of two worlds honestly, both makes you feel wonder and critical about things. So glad that I get to witness these two in the same lifeline.
At 12:10, the thing is cooper is not just any pilot he is also an engineer, skilled and knowledgeable through Math and Science also add technology, that's why he understand the deep meaning of every theoretical situation.
Interstellar is the true masterpiece. Watched that movie in a theater multiple times just because of it's sound. Watched it at home multiple times. Even watched it in a bus while traveling and almost cried in the damn bus. I believe he delivered his masterpiece illusion (he outlined in The Prestige movie) with the Interstellar. It's remarkable how the movie evoke strong emotions and awe and makes you wanna believe it's magic trick despite you knowing it's a magic trick. I feel like the movie has a 2 layer. One speaks to your brain, the other speaks to your soul.
My Theory as to why the dialogue sound is crappy on Nolan films has to do with the over exposition. If it was very clear dialogue every time then it would get very cheesy very fast: “a dream within a dream within a dream and I go in there and put a thought on a persons mind“. “Reverse bullets from reverse universe I made and sent myself to stop myself “. 😊
yeah broo that mightt just be it instead of all these so called intelectual guesses, i do that too with my poetry just to lessen the cheesy ness i use unfamiliar words
I appreciate you going through the whole spectrum of good, bad, and ugly. Too many videos exclusively swing to one extreme or the other: either all of this is the best thing, or all of this is the worst- which is insulting and tiresome. You did a proper critique and I enjoyed watching your video. Cheers.
I like Nolan, more as a film creator than a film director. You praised things about him that make him weak as a director, in my opinion. The comparison between The Dark Knight's fighting scene to the 2022 fighting scene was a fail, the latter being the better.
_Ah yes, Christopher Nolan, the maestro behind the curtain of _*_Man of Steel_*_ not only lent his golden touch to the film’s production, but also, in his infinite wisdom, carefully curated the sonic experience, handpicking none other than Hans Zimmer, Lisa Gerrard, and Patrick Cassidy for the score._ _Because when you're sculpting a modern-day myth, you don’t just leave the music to chance-you summon titans of sound._ _It’s as though Nolan, in his quiet omnipotence, whispered to Snyder, “Here’s how you craft the perfect Superman, and while you’re at it, let me arrange the soundtrack that will make every goosebump rise in synchronized awe.” Of course, Nolan’s selection was impeccable-as if he was gifting Snyder a symphonic roadmap that could only be read by the gods of Olympus themselves._
Amazing video, well edited as well adds to story ur telling and critical points u make and i agree with with both the pros and cons of Nolan's Directing style. Often his amazing technical direction makes us loses the emotional pull.
a lot of his movies always have a dash of noir in them. connects them all really nicely. guys in suits doing dashing things in good lighting tied to some more complicated idea hes trying to get across. the noir genre is his vehicle for the ethereal i many cases. not always though (interstellar for example).
The fact that I, as the viewer, had to do homework to understand all the things going on in TENET, made me super respect that film. I’ve never had a movie that *required* me to understand things about the movie before I could appreciate the movie. 1. Story is told in 2nd person. Making Neil the main character. 2. Neil is Maxmillien 3. Based on the SATOR square 4. I didn’t realize I liked Robert Pattinson until I saw this movie
you made me realise what were the cons of tenet that made me disconnected to the film , couldn't agree more . Was unable to figure it out over my blind love for Nolan
I dont know about other nolans movie but i love Interstellar ❤❤❤ he is genius, the sound , filmography, science everything i love in his movies , really the genius of cinema
Christopher's nolan flims can never dissappoint in any way wheather in action or logic or science. He makes everything so realistic that it feels we could somehow able to do 😅 It's so good that we have such incredibly genius directors on earth which can think of life on another planet 🎉😂
At this point whatever nolan is making is incredible , we want to watch what he is making regard of the fact how it should be , we just want to watch whatever he is up to.
I think the complaint about Nolan’s character development and the risks always being too much misses the point. While those things are nice I believe Nolan wants us to primarily to directly grapple with the complex issues that frame the problems
12:31 Isn’t that to bring the audience along? I suspect he writes exposition both ways - showing and dialog - to decide. In some cases he may shoot it both ways to see what works best. A big pain to re-shoot if crucial feedback complains about clarity. 7:37 Maybe watch audio levels, 18:47 and strongly consider saying “Warner Brothers” or “Warners.” 13:21 True. Many of us have fatal illnesses without wanting to kill the world. Well done.
And still many filmmakers out there insist to make movies their way… Snyder, Paul ws Andersson, guy Richie, they make a banger of a movie just to follow up with flopping harder than last time. No consistency, it’s like they can’t make a good movie with whatever script. They just can’t seem to make it work. “You gotta wait for the Snyder cut” has been the latest excuse I’ve seen people use… like wtf
So the three main complaints about Nolan's techniques has to do with the sound being muddled, verbal exposition of things characters should know, and too abstract plots. The thing for me is that I have always had extremely sensitive hearing. So even with your examples of masked characters...I still don't understand how people don't understand what they are saying. It sounds clear to me. I know the words every time, even while closing my eyes. Granted, I'm young. Just...odd to me
Nolan is a genius, but he can be too smart for his own good, and he doesn't go out of his way to make the stories more digestible or understandable for the audience and often just expects then to know what's in his head to appreciate what he's doing. There's no doubt his filmmaking is brilliant, but it's frustrating when he's so self-indulgent in creating this intricate puzzles of stories that he forces you to watch his films several times to get what he's trying to say.
Isn’t that what makes Nolan popular and people love him in the first place?Because he makes complex movies like Puzzle?Its just happenes that he is a big director doing it Inception and Tenet has no difference than Doni Darko,Primal,Triangle or Mulholland Drive the only difference was those movies are in smaller scale needs to require multiple viewing and niche compared to Nolan that has high budget and popular.Thats Nolan strength as a filmmaker he makes high budget mind bending movies.The most normal movies he makes was pretty much the Batman trilogy and Oppenheimer most of his movies like Memento required multiple viewing
My feelings on Christopher Nolan are mixed. He's my favorite director, but his movies are either really good, or just not good at all. Insomnia, Tenet, and Dunkirk are so dull, they are hard to get through.
"We never see anything to justify this level of emotional connection". Sure we do; she kills her husband, the protagonist saves him; it is his fault she is in danger.
Its crazy how christfer nolan is the greatest Director of all time 3 of his movies are in my top 5 fight club is the best though even if he didn't make it Inception 2nd interstellar 3rd and the pledge 4th and 5th well I'm still deciding
I think he is a great spectacle direcror like Cameron, but also like Cameron, the performances in his films feel hollow and unnatural, and his diogue feels inorganic and not at all how people actually speak. No matter how beautiful and grand it looks and sounds, if the acting and dialogue feel phony it just totally takes me out of the experience, which is my biggest complaint with Nolan.
I think a director that can make a complex concept simple is a good director. Nolan just decides to confuse you on things that should be simple. And I hate that so many unneeded things are spelled out in his movies such as the theme of the film in interstellar or why the joker is doing what he is doing in the dark knight. I never once felt emotionally invested except for interstellar. His other movies feel very cold by comparison. The films are always good but never great except for interstellar. Sometimes the performances are amazing but other times they are subpar, such as Marion Collitard’s performance in the dark knight rises. Even in interstellar the opening being a documentary is a major flaw in the film as it pulls you out of it, I feel like he is severely overrated and makes good movies in general not great ones. And guys, stop praising his films because most of them are in imax. He just has the budget to afford it and it’s not because he is amazing at cinematography. His films look bland otherwise
His movies are what movies should be. An event that takes you to another world or time. Disney movies are too political same with other Hollywood studios. When I go watch a Nolan movie I know I will be entertained not pandered
Thank you Mr Nolan for everything you have given to movie history and to us , audiences around the world. Cinema is not understood in the 21 st century without Christopher Nolan movies. There are not enough awards to thank your contribution to movie making . Thank you for so much. October 21, 2023.
I second this 21st December 2023
Superb analysis!
Especially inclusion of his weaker aspects which usually gets blurred out in the light of his movie's success.
Very high quality video. Nolan at the very least is an auteur. Love him or hate him you know his films when you see them.
And you love them(his films) too
Nolan is the king of cross-cutting and slow zooms. I’m always on the edge everytime he does either
Unrelated but I don’t get why redditors like to accuse people of being Nolan meat riders just for liking his films. Like it doesn’t matter if they are pretentious or try to be too smart. I’d rather have a film that’s too smart than too stupid
@redrox3312first mistake was seeing reddit as an outlet of criticism. They don’t live in reality over there.
He doesn’t linger on Kat’s son Max in Tenet because we have seen him all movie as the grown adult Neil (MaximiLIEN < > NEIL)
😮
Great video, but I feel like it is missing out on one of the key aspects that elevate Nolan's movies to the next level: his exceptional, mind-bending plot writing. His stories are incredibly detailed, original and planned out to perfection, almost always containing at least one unexpected twist that so many movies nowadays lack. Complaints about his stories being too complex are simply a result of a lack of attention during his movies imo.
I'd agree with all of that except how his stories are really complex, being honest. People always say they had to watch his movies twice or thrice before understanding, and I've never once watched any of them more than once. Every movie has a well structured story that is self explanatory on the first watch, and I'd only ever agree that maybe Memento may have had a few people re-watching. And even more, Inception is revered so much despite just being very much "inspired" by Paprika (the colors, scenes, direction, etc.) and the Japanese novel Paprika was adapted from, and I feel Inception was inferior in originality comparatively to those two, and nowhere near as good as Nolan's other movies, except TENET (which didn't feel much like a Nolan's movie either).
@@TheZynecIt’s like poetry, you have to read it multiple times to eventually understand it.
@@Gr8GooseTH-cam Before you talk about reading poetry twice, at least read my comment fully once. It's literally explaining that the movies aren't complex enough to only be understood on a re-watch. It's just a matter of paying attention and comprehension. I know it's such a shocker that you require media literacy to understand the media you consume, right?
@@TheZynec I’m agreeing with you, I’m just saying sometimes people have to read poetry twice, it’s a sign of good writing.
I’m not trying to correct you or argue with you, I am simply adding to the discussion. Don’t jump to conclusions, but thanks for the long paragraph.
I don't get the whole inaudible dialogue complaint. Never in theaters or at home have I had any trouble understanding Nolan's films.
You just gave yourself away Clark Kent
@@blackdynamite_5470everyone is overreacting. There are times when the sound mixing isn't the best, but from how the internet acts, it's inaudible
Same here
@charlesburns7391 I struggle to hear dialog in his films quite frequently. I don't hate him for it, and I think there are times when environmental and background noise are more important than dialog, but I often struggle to hear what the actors are saying. I don't hare Christopher Nolan for this, but everyone processes audio and dialog differently, which is something to consider. The fact that it's a know topic regarding CN films indicates that this may be an issue for some viewers, and others' opinions may be perceived as inconsiderate and apathetic
kinda funny i just commented on a interstellar video that the audio is terrible, i can't even hear the dialog,.
The editing is beautiful!
Thanks!
Interstellar WILL NEVER be beaten, EVER!
Its largely boring dotted with a few interesting scenes with a very loud score to cover. Contact from 1997 is a far more interesting movie with a similar run time.
@@99footballfreak nah, you're just upset that Interstellar challenged your nostalgic ego 😂
Hell yeah🫡
I agree, makes me cry everytime, not because of the sad plot but because of the magnificence
Tenet remains one of Nolan’s best movies, endlessly questioned by people who didn’t pay enough attention to it.
The Protagonist from the very first mission we see him in, is established that he will divert from the mission for the sake of saving people. He does succeed in the main objective in the Opera, but he also takes it upon himself to save the civilians in the crowd as well.
As soon as he returns from his coma, the first thing he asks is whether his team made it out. When he hears they didn’t, he cries.
From the get go we realize he will do whatever is necessary for his missions, but that he also cares for people and will deviate from his main objective to save lives.
Nolan doesn’t have an exposition problem. Audiences have simply proven themselves to require spoon feeding information, and Tenet’s unfair backlash is a prime example.
I love Tenet. You're right; everyone nowadays want everything spoon fed. I loved rewatching this movie to dissect it over and over.
The amount of work on this video is appreciated. Thank you
I think a lot of people overlook that Christopher Nolan's best works were done in collaboration with his brother Jonathan Nolan.
Great Point. Jonathan Nolan did Westworld, wich was so Deep and Mindblowing. Did you watch it?
@claudio6032 No. I've heard of the show but never knew which OTT platform steamed it.
@@rinaldijames its on Amazon Prime.
I've said this time and time again! Chris best scripts have his brother's involvement, whether heavy or just a touch.
I never understood this sound issue people have with his films.
English is not my mother tongue, but I watched Tenet and Oppenheimer in The Netherlands, without speaking a word of Dutch, so the captions didn't help whatsoever, and understood everything just fine
how old are ya?
2000
Same here I think a lot of people need a hearing aid.😃😊
This was a fantastic video. Broke down what makes Nolan great with clear examples and also showed with examples the legitimate criticisms people have with his work. Outstanding stuff. Educational, entertaining, and informative.
5:30 -- Dunkirk
8:42 -- Hater gonna Hate and Lover gonna Love 😵😵
Honestly, i don't see Nolan as a director that focuses on characters more than the plot, while i do love the plot and story he gives us, just wish he could focus on the characters more so we could actually connect with the characters. That's my opinion though
The horns in Inception are actually the horns in Edith Piaf's "Non, je ne regrette rien", (theme song of the movie) but played 7 times slower, as if you were hearing it from a different dream layer.
awesome video! very insightful and informative. In regard to his sound mixing... I do agree that it is very hard to understand at times, but he made a great point in an interview a while ago. He basically said that it's intentional because he considers dialogue to be not the focal point of his scenes, he prefers all other sound over the dialogue. What I gathered from him saying that was it is basically a "you'll figure it out" situation. And I usually find that upon rewatches I understand it way more. Denis Villeneuve works similarly with (lack of) dialogue in his movies. All that to say, I totally still understand why people are annoyed by not being able to hear haha it's totally valid. The other thing I've noticed about his storytelling is that a lot of his plot points are very subtle. For example the motivation of Sator in Tenet that you mentioned... he has a line directed toward his wife in the movie "If I can't have you, then nobody can". I think that line right there mostly explains his motivation for ending the world (as odd as it may be, but alas, he's the antagonist).
Within the first minute, saying most of Hollywood relies on Hollywood tent pole movies using previously established intellectual properties, and showing Batman, then calling Nolan an outlier. He directed three Batman movies. I love Nolan movies and this was a good video. Just thought that was funny.
those last lines were cool; and pretty much summarizes the magic behind his movies
Don't try to understand. Just feel it.
There he goes, finally a well deserved Oscar.
Inception restored my faith in film
Go and watch Stanley Kubrick 2001
@@c111samakalam5 I watched it and it's a masterpiece 😍
Crap
I'm not overly impressed with that VOX article you quoted. It mistakenly assumes what the film Tenet is trying to say, and then criticizes the film for failing, rather than even considering whether the initial assumption might be wrong.
I feel like there's a phenomenon in modern film appreciation that I think amounts to jumping on bandwagons. There's so much discourse, so many emotionally charged hot takes, that once an opinion takes hold in the public arena, a veritable mob emerges, ready to die on that hill. When The Last Jedi came out, critics for the most part thoroughly enjoyed the way it examined and deepened the Star Wars universe. But once the mob took over the discourse, no one wanted to discuss it in the face of emotional "fans" coming out of the woodwork to proclaim, yet again, it had destroyed Star Wars. So discourse vanished, leaving the least considered, most emotionally reactionary opinion as the last word on the subject.
The same seems true for Tenet. After it proved to be its own thing, and not the new Inception, everyone had a hot take on what they think it's supposed to be, and how it fails. In particular, it's assumed that the connection between the protagonist and Kat is romantic in nature. Of course, because it's Nolan's take on James Bond, what else should it be? But in fact, this is anything but the case. Everyone is wrapped up trying to follow all the details of the dialog, and getting frustrated when it's unclear, while simultaneously criticizing Nolan's reliance on dialog-heavy exposition rather than character development. Meanwhile, the real story plays out in the actions. The protagonist cockily appears in Kat's life as a savior, and then promptly puts her in mortal danger. But he doesn't really seem aware of how cavalier he's been with her life while playing his spy games. Not until she rakes him over the coals for it, shattering his self-image as a smooth action hero. Suddenly, he's no longer strutting around as he did earlier in the film. He's trying to fix his mistakes, taking risks to protect her, and ultimately, rebuilds his whole mission around saving her life, because after all, he's the one who put it in danger. Ultimately, the point of the whole story is "What does it mean to save the world if you don't care about the people?"
As for Sator's threat to destroy the world, that's not the real stakes. The stakes come down to Sator's philosophy that the world is meaningless, vs the protagonist's desire to find meaning in it. If no one matters to the protagonist, if he's only saving a hypothetical whole world and not a particular person, then saving the world doesn't really matter to him anymore than it matters to Sator. The whole film is a philosophical debate about the need for faith in the real, objective existence of other people. Sator's stance, stated plainly at the end, is that he doesn't believe in anything or anyone beyond his own experience. So it doesn't matter to him that it all ceases to exist. "If I can't have you, no one can." That's the philosophy of solipsism, the belief that the universe can't be proven to exist beyond one's own experience of it. It's the ultimate narcissistic belief, the locked room from which there's no escape, because it can't be disproved. To escape it requires faith, and true empathy. Ultimately, the protagonist's determination to save Kat is his expression of empathy for her, something he didn't give thought to in the beginning.
So in the same way, it doesn't matter that we don't know Kat's son, whether he's a good kid or a bad one. Kat's motivation isn't about his qualities. It's about Kat's absolute love for him regardless. That's what motherhood means, but it's also a demonstration of faith that inspires the protagonist. She models for him the love without judgement he should feel for humanity as a whole, especially if he's going to lay down his life for it.
All this is right there in the film if you stop worrying about timelines, stop trying to tease out the puzzle. That's the point of the film, to be presented with a complex problem that's nearly impossible to unravel, until you realize that unraveling the puzzle was never the point. The point is to save the Kat.
TL'DR
@@FranciscoJV0 I get that a lot. 🙂
Nolans films have a sense of mystery to it and that's why I love them
The relationship in Tenent doesn’t need much beyond “Mother wants to be with her child”. The protagonist is in a position to achieve his goals and actually help. She tells us he’s purposefully keeping him from her and damaging their relationship, so the distance we see as the audience makes sense because it imitates how the mother feels herself. As for Sator, we often have to react in the real world to others with knowing the full scope of their motivations. Like the other complaint it would feel out of place to have him monologue an explanation in full detail. People who are truly set on ending their life have few words left and we see this behavior. And to visibly show the stakes would feel cheap and preachy given the current political climate.
Many of the other claims are 100% valid imo. Tenet seemed to be an exercise in seeing how much the director could get away with in terms of conveying a narrative experience mostly through the experience.
Video was good until it went off on a negative tangent about Tenet. Film is a masterpiece and I don't want to hear anything else
Bro it has flaws no matter what’s you say
More than great analysis video 🫡✨🎥
I don't know whu but I can't help but to compare and align Nolan's movies and Hideo's video games. I got the best of two worlds honestly, both makes you feel wonder and critical about things. So glad that I get to witness these two in the same lifeline.
he's just as obsessed with time as I am, his movies realllly speak to me
At 12:10, the thing is cooper is not just any pilot he is also an engineer, skilled and knowledgeable through Math and Science also add technology, that's why he understand the deep meaning of every theoretical situation.
You misinterpreted what she said. The argument is he would already understand/be the slightest bit familiar with it as an engineer
Interstellar is the true masterpiece. Watched that movie in a theater multiple times just because of it's sound. Watched it at home multiple times. Even watched it in a bus while traveling and almost cried in the damn bus. I believe he delivered his masterpiece illusion (he outlined in The Prestige movie) with the Interstellar. It's remarkable how the movie evoke strong emotions and awe and makes you wanna believe it's magic trick despite you knowing it's a magic trick. I feel like the movie has a 2 layer. One speaks to your brain, the other speaks to your soul.
My Theory as to why the dialogue sound is crappy on Nolan films has to do with the over exposition. If it was very clear dialogue every time then it would get very cheesy very fast: “a dream within a dream within a dream and I go in there and put a thought on a persons mind“. “Reverse bullets from reverse universe I made and sent myself to stop myself “. 😊
yeah broo that mightt just be it instead of all these so called intelectual guesses, i do that too with my poetry just to lessen the cheesy ness i use unfamiliar words
I appreciate you going through the whole spectrum of good, bad, and ugly. Too many videos exclusively swing to one extreme or the other: either all of this is the best thing, or all of this is the worst- which is insulting and tiresome.
You did a proper critique and I enjoyed watching your video.
Cheers.
theres movies i watched i didn't know he directed and i loved them.. when i found out it was a duh moment why i loved them
...and it is so nicely made. Really enjoyed watching it.... thank you!
incredible video
Amazing video
Thanks!
Very interesting analysis and good illustrations to go with it. Thank you!
Christopher Nolan is one of the greatest directors ever his use of sound and imagery is just brilliant
love nolan
First part about overlapping plots is well said
I like Nolan, more as a film creator than a film director. You praised things about him that make him weak as a director, in my opinion. The comparison between The Dark Knight's fighting scene to the 2022 fighting scene was a fail, the latter being the better.
_Ah yes, Christopher Nolan, the maestro behind the curtain of _*_Man of Steel_*_ not only lent his golden touch to the film’s production, but also, in his infinite wisdom, carefully curated the sonic experience, handpicking none other than Hans Zimmer, Lisa Gerrard, and Patrick Cassidy for the score._
_Because when you're sculpting a modern-day myth, you don’t just leave the music to chance-you summon titans of sound._
_It’s as though Nolan, in his quiet omnipotence, whispered to Snyder, “Here’s how you craft the perfect Superman, and while you’re at it, let me arrange the soundtrack that will make every goosebump rise in synchronized awe.” Of course, Nolan’s selection was impeccable-as if he was gifting Snyder a symphonic roadmap that could only be read by the gods of Olympus themselves._
Wasn’t inception horn just stock trailer music, I don’t remember if Nolan or Zimmer had anything to do with composing
Nolan is the best director of all time. Period. He is an artistic genius, up there with the likes of Leonardo DaVinci
Amazing video, well edited as well adds to story ur telling and critical points u make and i agree with with both the pros and cons of Nolan's Directing style. Often his amazing technical direction makes us loses the emotional pull.
Great video!! But just wanted to know if I'm colourblind/an idiot, or if the colours of the graph at 3:55 makes no sense for anyone else too? Lol
Now you made me think I'm colour-blind with that timestamp...😶😶🌫
My favourite director, love his amazing works!
a lot of his movies always have a dash of noir in them. connects them all really nicely. guys in suits doing dashing things in good lighting tied to some more complicated idea hes trying to get across. the noir genre is his vehicle for the ethereal i many cases. not always though (interstellar for example).
The fact that I, as the viewer, had to do homework to understand all the things going on in TENET, made me super respect that film. I’ve never had a movie that *required* me to understand things about the movie before I could appreciate the movie.
1. Story is told in 2nd person. Making Neil the main character.
2. Neil is Maxmillien
3. Based on the SATOR square
4. I didn’t realize I liked Robert Pattinson until I saw this movie
Authenticity, being true to one’s self is something people love. As they should.
12:50 guys, sorry but if Nolan wants to explain, then that is for a reason and it is the best alternative in the moment.
1:10 he's going to be in a Christopher movie with Tom Holland
Christopher Nolan makes the beautifulest sets of movies, always
13:10 Her kid is Neil who came from the future and became friends with the protagonist
😮
you made me realise what were the cons of tenet that made me disconnected to the film , couldn't agree more . Was unable to figure it out over my blind love for Nolan
7:10 what scene it is
It's a scene from Batman vs Superman
I dont know about other nolans movie but i love Interstellar ❤❤❤ he is genius, the sound , filmography, science everything i love in his movies , really the genius of cinema
I love his expositions
3:59 background music ?
Hans Zimmer music has great contribution in making Nolan's movies masterpiece.
Christopher's nolan flims can never dissappoint in any way wheather in action or logic or science. He makes everything so realistic that it feels we could somehow able to do 😅 It's so good that we have such incredibly genius directors on earth which can think of life on another planet 🎉😂
At this point whatever nolan is making is incredible , we want to watch what he is making regard of the fact how it should be , we just want to watch whatever he is up to.
This is the guy I wanna be when I get into making movies
Amazing video ❤. Do Quentin Tarantino next
Nolan's movies feel more like documentries than movies 🤣
super nice video, thank you !
I think the complaint about Nolan’s character development and the risks always being too much misses the point. While those things are nice I believe Nolan wants us to primarily to directly grapple with the complex issues that frame the problems
Very nice video. New perspective.
12:31 Isn’t that to bring the audience along? I suspect he writes exposition both ways - showing and dialog - to decide. In some cases he may shoot it both ways to see what works best. A big pain to re-shoot if crucial feedback complains about clarity. 7:37 Maybe watch audio levels, 18:47 and strongly consider saying “Warner Brothers” or “Warners.” 13:21 True. Many of us have fatal illnesses without wanting to kill the world. Well done.
But 2 things are common in Nolan movie universe
they all assemble for mission & survival / Just survival thriller
And still many filmmakers out there insist to make movies their way… Snyder, Paul ws Andersson, guy Richie, they make a banger of a movie just to follow up with flopping harder than last time. No consistency, it’s like they can’t make a good movie with whatever script. They just can’t seem to make it work. “You gotta wait for the Snyder cut” has been the latest excuse I’ve seen people use… like wtf
My favourite is memento-inception-batman-interstellar-tenet-oppenhiemer-dunkirk-prestige-following-insomnia
and use IMAX cam give some advantage no? All best movies = Imax
Music too load and distorts what dialogue
So the three main complaints about Nolan's techniques has to do with the sound being muddled, verbal exposition of things characters should know, and too abstract plots. The thing for me is that I have always had extremely sensitive hearing. So even with your examples of masked characters...I still don't understand how people don't understand what they are saying. It sounds clear to me. I know the words every time, even while closing my eyes. Granted, I'm young. Just...odd to me
Shoulda write why stanley kubrick's film feel so different.
It's genuinely hard for me to remember a time before the *_BWOMMMMMMMM_* sound was used in movies 😅
17:49 heheheh “despise” hehehe
Good review lol
Oppenheimer was an exercise in cramming as much exposition in each scene as possible, at times it felt like a musical but without the music
Next...Edgar wright!
It's because he's very intelligent period
Nolan is a genius, but he can be too smart for his own good, and he doesn't go out of his way to make the stories more digestible or understandable for the audience and often just expects then to know what's in his head to appreciate what he's doing. There's no doubt his filmmaking is brilliant, but it's frustrating when he's so self-indulgent in creating this intricate puzzles of stories that he forces you to watch his films several times to get what he's trying to say.
Isn’t that what makes Nolan popular and people love him in the first place?Because he makes complex movies like Puzzle?Its just happenes that he is a big director doing it Inception and Tenet has no difference than Doni Darko,Primal,Triangle or Mulholland Drive the only difference was those movies are in smaller scale needs to require multiple viewing and niche compared to Nolan that has high budget and popular.Thats Nolan strength as a filmmaker he makes high budget mind bending movies.The most normal movies he makes was pretty much the Batman trilogy and Oppenheimer most of his movies like Memento required multiple viewing
My feelings on Christopher Nolan are mixed. He's my favorite director, but his movies are either really good, or just not good at all. Insomnia, Tenet, and Dunkirk are so dull, they are hard to get through.
Make one detailed analysis on Quentin Tarantino also
"We never see anything to justify this level of emotional connection". Sure we do; she kills her husband, the protagonist saves him; it is his fault she is in danger.
Awesome breakdown of Nolan.
Its crazy how christfer nolan is the greatest Director of all time 3 of his movies are in my top 5 fight club is the best though even if he didn't make it Inception 2nd interstellar 3rd and the pledge 4th and 5th well I'm still deciding
ALso, his face on thumbnail. Totally diffrent...
I think he is a great spectacle direcror like Cameron, but also like Cameron, the performances in his films feel hollow and unnatural, and his diogue feels inorganic and not at all how people actually speak. No matter how beautiful and grand it looks and sounds, if the acting and dialogue feel phony it just totally takes me out of the experience, which is my biggest complaint with Nolan.
Because they are good. So few are today. I can only think of 3 people making quality films; Nolan, Cameron and Villeneuve.
Tarintino is done right?
Tarantino has 1 more movie left
Watch more movies
Nice!
Not watching videos from creators who use AI
Then go watch Cocomelon
in what part did they use AI?
Genius!
They had Rembrandt we have Nolan..
I want to EDIt videos like this
nolan isn’t the best film maker or story teller. but he does get the required budget from studios to present his vision, which others don’t.
Do you recommend any other directors that you think are better in either aspects? Just curious
What was the budget of movie that you have directed
I think a director that can make a complex concept simple is a good director. Nolan just decides to confuse you on things that should be simple. And I hate that so many unneeded things are spelled out in his movies such as the theme of the film in interstellar or why the joker is doing what he is doing in the dark knight. I never once felt emotionally invested except for interstellar. His other movies feel very cold by comparison. The films are always good but never great except for interstellar. Sometimes the performances are amazing but other times they are subpar, such as Marion Collitard’s performance in the dark knight rises. Even in interstellar the opening being a documentary is a major flaw in the film as it pulls you out of it, I feel like he is severely overrated and makes good movies in general not great ones. And guys, stop praising his films because most of them are in imax. He just has the budget to afford it and it’s not because he is amazing at cinematography. His films look bland otherwise
His movies are what movies should be. An event that takes you to another world or time. Disney movies are too political same with other Hollywood studios. When I go watch a Nolan movie I know I will be entertained not pandered