2022-2023 Leading Ideal L9 (理想L9) C-IASI Crashworthiness Tests (Small Overlap Crash Tests + More)

An establishment in China that performs test protocols like those from IIHS and EuroNCAP. Additional Protocols added for later 2020 Model Year testing. (Passenger Side Small Overlap added for select 2021/2022 models.)
Original Source: www.ciasi.org.cn/resultDetail...
www.ciasi.org.cn/result
Manufactured by: Chongqing Ideal Automobiles Co.
Crashworthiness & Maintenance Economy Index - M (Overall)
-Structural Crashworthiness - G
-Repairability - M
-Maintenance Economy - M
-Collision Compatibility - A
Occupant Protection - G (Overall)
-Small Overlap (Driver Side) - G
Small Overlap (Passenger Side) - G
-Side Impact - G
-Roof Strength - G
Whiplash - G
Pedestrian Protection - G
G=Excellent, A=Good, M="General", P=Poor.
IIHS-Syle Bumper Engagement Low Speed Crash Tests at 5 Mph (8 Km/h) (0:36)
30-Degree Low-Speed RCAR Bumper Tests at 9.3 Mph (15 Km/h) (1:16)
25% Driver-Side Small Overlap Crash Test at 40 Mph (64 Km/h) (2:00)
25% Passenger-Side Small Overlap Crash Test at 40 Mph (64 Km/h) (3:35)
MDB Side Impact (Side Impact Test 1.0) with a 1500kg Barrier at 31 Mph (50 Km/h) (5:23)
Roof Crush Test (6:25)
Front Seat Whiplash Assessment at 10 Mph (16.2 Km/h) (7:00)
Pedestrian Impact Tests (7:21)
#crashtest #理想L9

[@kode1996]

I like how they have a rear dummy in the small overlap for driver and passenger test. Did they just recently start testing the passenger side as well?

[@CarPro1993]

They've only tested a few models this year for the passenger side, they'll likely do more as time goes on.

[@andreasausmuc]

@CarPro:
The load to weight ratio in the roof crush test - do you have any clue what the top performing vehicles reach?
Would 4.66 of the Leading be good - roof certainly looks fine....

[@dandiart5383]

Volvo XC60 has 5.06, so i guess it's not bad

[@andreasausmuc]

@@dandiart5383
Oh thank you - that's indeed helpful!!!

[@CarPro1993]

Using IIHS's results as a guide, comparable-sized European SUVs are 5.00 - 5.30. It appears that other newer Chinese vehicles vary wildly, but are usually above 4.00 that's needed to earn a "Good" rating.

[@andreasausmuc]

@@CarPro1993
Okay - that's interesting!
Wondering if the reason for that are different goals when designing a vehicle?
Or if it has to do with weight increase due to electrification?

[@Mykynda]

@@andreasausmuc may be because of glass roof in chineese cars.

[@Pitufiino]

Vivió o no vivió??? 😮

[@praim333]

Как обычно китай и безопасность это далеко ещё

[@muradtagirov7534]

Он получили 5 звёзд из 5

[@Mister.5505]

И как ты это понял? 😅

[@praim333]

@@muradtagirov7534 по китайским меркам. Посмотрим тест в Европе

[@maximalexandrov4080]

Видео похоже не сиоьрели даже

[@ZOVFA]

что ты несешь?)))