A very helpful way of doing this effectively is by following the book "How to solve it". It essentially states, that the first step is to figure the problem out, imagine it as best as you can and as the second step formulate a plan (how the problem is expected to be solved). This is what it is also talked about, but these are crucial problem solving skills to master
1000% my experience actually you can graduate from uni with only procedural knowledge, most people do actually but most people get the hang of it during grad school, so my experience I suspect it's the research that forces higher-order thinking
It is important to note that the neural systems which govern the procedure mode are not model-free. Rather, the Procedural System (that's it's formal name in neuroscience) selects the proper action chain based on situational signals at a higher level of perceptual information processing than simple sensory signals. The perceptual information processing is model-based, so it can cut through superficial features fairly well as long as the situational signals match the perceptual model. Because of this, the conceptual problems can be rapidly solved by the Procedural System if the proper action chains are practiced in a variety of superficially distinct contexts with a common deep structure. The procedural problems can also be solved by the Deliberative System if the student has sufficient hippocampal maps of those problems, but that is a super slow process.
@@benjaminkeep If you were to read The Mind Within The Brain by David Redish, I'm certain you will see a strong picture of how the neural decision-making systems govern the learning phenomena you are familiar with from cognitive science and pedagogical science. Most journal articles on the topic are targeted at very narrow research questions, which don't really outline full model of these systems. David and I are working on a paper to concisely outline the model with pedagogy researchers as part of our target audience. His book was written before some of the work on these signal processing effects, but it is a great foundation for understanding how each of the decision-making modes are governed by separate systems with separate learning mechanisms.
Really interesting to confirm my experience. I'm an engineer and I solved thousands of problems achieving good grades without ever understanding 100% what I was doing. Another good way of understanding is to be curious about the formulas and their meening. Go as deep as your curiosity takes you!
I don't know but this might be to antagonistic brain networks TPN and DMN one is for focus and task execution and other is related to imaginary abilities when you disangage from doing and produce mind content.
1:12 This is just like follwong a chess textbook move!!!! People complain of players who play like this as boring, you're not actually playing and solving for yourself but following a routine.
A very helpful way of doing this effectively is by following the book "How to solve it".
It essentially states, that the first step is to figure the problem out, imagine it as best as you can and as the second step formulate a plan (how the problem is expected to be solved). This is what it is also talked about, but these are crucial problem solving skills to master
1000% my experience
actually you can graduate from uni with only procedural knowledge, most people do actually
but most people get the hang of it during grad school, so my experience
I suspect it's the research that forces higher-order thinking
It is important to note that the neural systems which govern the procedure mode are not model-free. Rather, the Procedural System (that's it's formal name in neuroscience) selects the proper action chain based on situational signals at a higher level of perceptual information processing than simple sensory signals. The perceptual information processing is model-based, so it can cut through superficial features fairly well as long as the situational signals match the perceptual model. Because of this, the conceptual problems can be rapidly solved by the Procedural System if the proper action chains are practiced in a variety of superficially distinct contexts with a common deep structure. The procedural problems can also be solved by the Deliberative System if the student has sufficient hippocampal maps of those problems, but that is a super slow process.
Can you provide some references for further reading? My understanding of neuroscience is pretty sketchy. Thanks!
@@benjaminkeep If you were to read The Mind Within The Brain by David Redish, I'm certain you will see a strong picture of how the neural decision-making systems govern the learning phenomena you are familiar with from cognitive science and pedagogical science. Most journal articles on the topic are targeted at very narrow research questions, which don't really outline full model of these systems. David and I are working on a paper to concisely outline the model with pedagogy researchers as part of our target audience. His book was written before some of the work on these signal processing effects, but it is a great foundation for understanding how each of the decision-making modes are governed by separate systems with separate learning mechanisms.
Great, I'll check it out - many thanks!
Really interesting to confirm my experience. I'm an engineer and I solved thousands of problems achieving good grades without ever understanding 100% what I was doing.
Another good way of understanding is to be curious about the formulas and their meening. Go as deep as your curiosity takes you!
0:53 Gigachad there solving only 400 problems and still getting a 4.
_NOICE_
Did he ever do the other video about why the procedural mode impairs the conceptual one?
I don't know but this might be to antagonistic brain networks TPN and DMN one is for focus and task execution and other is related to imaginary abilities when you disangage from doing and produce mind content.
Great info 🔥🔥🔥
Am I counting them wrong or there are only 1579 white dots here, not 1600?
I feel like I fell into your trap to see who will count them all 😅🤣
1590
1:12 This is just like follwong a chess textbook move!!!! People complain of players who play like this as boring, you're not actually playing and solving for yourself but following a routine.