Cybercriminal reveals how to hack with MikroTik

แชร์
ฝัง

ความคิดเห็น • 41

  • @userou-ig1ze
    @userou-ig1ze ปีที่แล้ว +11

    This series format is super interesting, but really, it's more valuable if you present red team AND blue team approach

  • @nikolashuminosky6987
    @nikolashuminosky6987 ปีที่แล้ว

    @Druvis - is that any chance that we can test the firewall via traffic-generator.
    I think that someone mentioned about that on the MUM.
    Are u familiar with that?

  • @erikruwalder97
    @erikruwalder97 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    the pcap injection is quite nice to test frewall's

  • @123XAH
    @123XAH ปีที่แล้ว +9

    How to protect from above mentioned flood?

    • @pierromaximus
      @pierromaximus ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You have to disable cdp on interfaces, that dont need it.
      Another option is to configure port security.

    • @maigonis.elleris
      @maigonis.elleris ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pierromaximus Port security is not always option, besides, this can be passed thru WiFi.

    • @pierromaximus
      @pierromaximus ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@maigonis.elleris You can isolate WIFI clients in separate VLAN and disable cdp on SVI interface.

  • @mikkio5371
    @mikkio5371 ปีที่แล้ว

    Druves .you are good ,where do you get all these knowledge from . Recommend books to me 🙏

    • @RB01-lite
      @RB01-lite ปีที่แล้ว

      The internet is the best resource. But if you want a good book here is one that I liked - 'The Art of Learning' by Josh Waitzkin.

  • @alimibrahem8120
    @alimibrahem8120 ปีที่แล้ว

    is it mendatory to use CDP packet ..? i mean if i want to test that on my router but i don't have Kali linux..!

  • @gomgom330
    @gomgom330 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hei, is remote mikrotik through wifi with ssh more secure than remote it with winbox even if winbox port changed??

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      There is no straight answer to that, but it will be a lot more secure in both cases if you only connect through a tunnel. Wireguard is particularly good as it does not respond to port scans.

  • @Nichomachean5
    @Nichomachean5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have one thing to say about these new mikrotik videos.... MORE. :)

  • @KhmerShare.config
    @KhmerShare.config ปีที่แล้ว

    What about the cpu of the router problem sir?

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  ปีที่แล้ว

      What is the problem?

    • @KhmerShare.config
      @KhmerShare.config ปีที่แล้ว

      how about cpu if have hack on mikrotik sir@@mikrotik

  • @zacohell
    @zacohell ปีที่แล้ว

    Is disabling neighbor discovery enough to protect the router from this attack?

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yes, but even so, do not keep open ports to untrusted networks. To be extra safe, use VPN to access the router, all other ports should be firewalled.

  • @DmitriyHaidai
    @DmitriyHaidai ปีที่แล้ว

    Could anyone help me? I followed all these steps and everything was going right way however my router doesnt have enough Total HDD memory for my injected file pcap. it is extremly larger than my router's HDD space.
    Obviously i cut down my file.pcap from 350Mb to 70 Mb and neighbor routers were not going to crash.
    I wonder to know what size of file.pcap do i need to overload neighbor routers?

    • @RB01-lite
      @RB01-lite ปีที่แล้ว

      Not sure. Perhaps you can use a USB drive. Alternatively a fun experiment might be write a script that generates raw data for traffic generator to inject ;)

  • @ronaldrobles5597
    @ronaldrobles5597 ปีที่แล้ว

    because the CPU goes up by 30% when updating v7

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Seems you paid too much, as you have 70% unused CPU resources 😎

  • @ameen-r8r
    @ameen-r8r ปีที่แล้ว

    how show app yersinal grapn......?

  • @liviu2004
    @liviu2004 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great, we’ll use this pcap method to record and inject traffic in dynamic positioning ships networks, to increase confidentiality in redundancy machinery arrangements to sustain worst case failure. Thanks.

    • @userou-ig1ze
      @userou-ig1ze ปีที่แล้ว

      can you elaborate

    • @maxvideodrome4215
      @maxvideodrome4215 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hackers movie?

    • @RB01-lite
      @RB01-lite ปีที่แล้ว

      Just don't hack NASA

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  ปีที่แล้ว

      Simply wait for the next video on how to protect yourself from dumb "hacks" like this :) and don't be so serious. If you have firewall, you are safe

    • @mikkio5371
      @mikkio5371 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@mikrotikdumb hack 😱😱meaning there are far more hacks to be aware of 😅

  • @AbdiKwon1445
    @AbdiKwon1445 ปีที่แล้ว

    this ddos ?

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  ปีที่แล้ว

      It's dos, ddos means there are multiple devices used for the attack.

  • @rafijuliansah
    @rafijuliansah 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    how are you

  • @website-nv4qb
    @website-nv4qb 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    hello

  • @kevinjosemarquez4801
    @kevinjosemarquez4801 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yo no Ingles

  • @boumarc
    @boumarc ปีที่แล้ว +1

    mikrotik should just fix routeros so that simple attacks like this don't cause reboots

    • @RB01-lite
      @RB01-lite ปีที่แล้ว +4

      This type of an attack can cause a reboot in devices by other manufacturers too. The only reason that it is possible to do this is that the compromised device is in a trusted network with neighbor discovery enabled.

    • @boumarc
      @boumarc ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RB01-lite the fact that other manufacturers have buggy or fragile software too isn't a valid argument for not fixing the bugs / weaknesses leading to such an easy denial of service attack

    • @mikrotik
      @mikrotik  ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Disabling firewall is not "denial of service", it is bad configuration

  • @mohammadforhad2473
    @mohammadforhad2473 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks