Right!! They all know how there is still 2-3 trillion dollars worth of easy extractible oil, gas and coal just sitting there. They'll stop when all that is gone
Human kind is just confused. This is simply not possible. Imagine south America and Africa for example where darkness is common. This people haven't seen 24/7 of electricity and you want them to transit to renewable. This people dosent know what you actually meant. Please try to get informed. Big joke 😂😂
While these conferences are needed, people put too much faith in just talk. Didn't a US presidential candidate just announce he is going to drill, drill, drill if elected? Addressing climate change can only be successfully done when the global community gets past all the coffee chat, and starts putting all the talk into action.
Are these conferences needed? Balance the carbon consumed in flying all these floaters to UAE for a week of cocktail parties and back slapping with what was actually accomplished.
This entire exercise amounts to nothing. India consumes approximately as much coal as the US and EU combined. China consumes four times that. China and India consume 62% of the world's coal. I don't see anyone bringing that up. That fact of the matter is: it's just a tax grab.
what are you on about. usa, eu companies make their products in these countries. Outsourcing pollution make usa, eu clean? On the other hand if you see per capita emission you will find different story.
headed by the ceo of one of the world's largest oil companies that made a statement against the entire message of the conference just over a week prior to its commencement
@@tvguy61 Nope, they're saying they hope to reach net zero in 2050, twenty years too late and still guzzling the whole time. The document isn't even worth its weight in toilet paper.
@@BlodhelmActually you are wrong about 20 years too late. Climate change will happen on a spectrum meaning that 4 degrees is worse than 3 is worse than 2 is worse than 1.5. If we can’t make 1.5 than we should limit to 2 if we can’t do that we should limit to 2.5. Every bit matters and every step is important. It is not toilet paper just because it doesn’t take the steps for a 1.5 degree pathway
this conference isnt even a greenwashing affair anymore, its a stage for the world's leaders to come together and strategise how to 'develop and expand' the fossil feul indistry globally. dont believe a world of th ebullshit spewed from the mouths of the ruling class, they want us dead.
Are you kidding. This must be a joke. Can we keep I touch to see that this was about a show. Let's see how the industrial nations will abide to this. Big joke
If no obligations, it guarantees zero outcome. You may simply forget about this event as dummy empty place and time waste. Everybody will do what is profitable
If we are calling for the abolition of fossil fuels, what about alternative fuels? Without such suggestions, it is meaningless. Those who are engaged in such opposition activities must also be benefiting from fossil fuels. There is no point in calling for its abolition while enjoying the benefits of fossil fuel power generation and production.
Things like biofuels, hydrogen and even nuclear are being discussed in addition to the renewable options. Other technologies like Geothermal are rapidly evolving. The whole point is that there are alternative options that can be switched to with effort. We have benefited greatly from fossil fuels but continuing to use them will lead to our ruin and sooner rather than later at this point.
@@brynphillips9957 We all know that fossil fuel consumption is harmful to the global environment. However, the reason why companies do not switch from fossil fuels to alternative fuels is because fossil fuels are cheaper. Unless we solve this problem, we won't be able to phase out fossil fuels. No country wants to be poor, just like you don't want to be poor.
The real alternative is birth control so that we reduce the amount of people so that there is no negative impact on the world from people. And then we will still have an ice age when it is time in the cycle of the universe for Earth to ice over again and renew itself.
there's billions of people, if we literally just expanded rail transport, banned private jets (main polluter) and made public transport free and accessible that would be cut in half in a year already
@@brynphillips9957 Reasonable and practical. I’m all for a transition to sustainable, renewable energy, except not really interested in living in a cave to make it happen this year. Attacking the producers of the energy source we all currently depend on is ridiculous. It involves no sacrifice. To make this transition successful, everyone has to significantly reduce their consumption of fossil fuel energy and transportation. This will effectively reduce the demand for fossil fuels and “back out” the need for them. This will require some sacrifice by all, it will cost a lot of money, and it will take time. This is reasonable and practical. I look forward to hearing your practical ideas to accomplish this.
@@AmonTheWitch Public transport moves through areas that are dangerous to unarmed civilian citizens. Public transportation is not a solution as long as law and order locally and internationally is not maintained.
WOW... Have you seen how much renewables China actually uses? Here is the thing you forget about China. If you looked at all the things that you own or were made in China and then had it made in your country then your CO2 output would be higher. Everyone shifted production to China and then they want to blame them for all the emissions, sadly that is not the full picture. If all these things produced were made in the country you live in they would cost 2x the amount or more and the CO2 as a total on the planet would not be that much lower. You can't look at a country and celebrate how low its CO2 footprint is if they don't produce goods because it's BS as its Carbon is just pushed to another country that makes those goods. It would be like importing all your meats and exporting ALL your garbage and saying you have the lowest Methane footprint... all you did was hand it off to someone else.
@bookerful 30 minutes ago Lake Maracaibo in Venezuela is the place on Earth that receives the most lightning strikes. Massive thunderstorms occur on 140-160 nights per year with an average of 28 lightning strikes per minute lasting up to 10 hours at a time. Grid will feed the EARTH-free clean energy for us all. FULMINOLOGY
To the now KING OF ENGLAND and ALL AT COP 28. FULMINOLOGY CLEAN FREE ENERGY HIDDEN IN ARCHIVES. Dear Prince Charles, Once upon a time, on 11th September 2004 to be exact, a Gran and Granddad were driving back from babysitting their grandchildren when all of a sudden Gran shouted: "WATCH OUT". Granddad was not looking where he was going and nearly crashed the van they were in. Granddad said he was "Sorry, and that he was put off his driving by something that caught his eye up in the sky" Granny looked up into the sky and asked "What is that?" Granddad stopped the van, and they both got out to look. "WOW," said Gran "WOW," said Granddad They were looking at a spaceship, huge, gigantic. Granddad said. "I could hit that with a catapult if I had one" Gran said. "Why doesn't it make a sound? Why are there small thundery clouds rushing inside it?" They watched the spacecraft for over Eight minutes, then it started to move slowly at first, then quite speedily. They jumped back in their van and followed it up the road till it went out of sight towards London. They never saw anyone, nor did they see any traffic pass them at that time. Gran and Granddad told their children and friends what they had seen, and most smiled and laughed at their story, mainly because the area in question has hundreds of cameras close by. If Gran and Granddad's story were true, then it would have surely been seen. Eleven years later on the anniversary of the sighting Granddad woke up early and told Gran he was going to visit the place at the exact time where they had seen the spaceship. Gran said, "Yes, go see if there's anything different?" Wow! He came back saying that the most unusual thing happened. This time there were planes in the sky, maybe four or five planes that he could see at any one time? He told Gran he saw crows flying and geese too, making sounds, Also Granddad counted the seconds for the next vehicle to pass by and could only reach 40 or so seconds then another vehicle would pass? Gran asked Granddad "What does this all mean?" Granddad said, "It means that the spaceship never got caught on cameras because it was speeding in some type of time tunnel,- a Bubble of some kind? and we both traveled in this phenomenon somehow?" "So why was the spaceship there?" said Gran, "So why were we allowed to see it? Was it the future? was it today's technology? Was the thundery rushing clouds on the inside of the Spaceship its camouflage or could it be how it was fuelled?" They have the exact time, the exact place. Surely this spaceship the size of Wembley Stadium would have left a trail somewhere? Somewhere on some radiation counters? Radar? Spectrometers?Gravitational Readings? Gran said, "All they need to do is investigate to find the answers?" Granddad sobbed and told Gran "That because of the size of the spaceship and no camera evidence, there was no way that this story would ever be believed? Because of how important this story is to mankind, and to the future I beg you all to tell your children in the hope that they find out how and why all this happened one day. yours sincerely Michael n Betty FULMINOLOGYTHE FUTURE SAVE THE PLANET
how are we gonna collect the carbon tax dollars from the volcanoes? 260million tons of carbon a year from volcanoes thats a lot of revenue for the state!
Good to hear that RENEWABLE ENERGY is on track. Slowly, changes will happen😊 Just ignore the ignorants, negative and closed minded people. Understand their capacities. No one is perfect guys😁 Most biased medias si also understandable, they are earning for negative thoughts😄
Not a chance fossil fuel will end. If you think that I am riding my bike at -35°C, you're dreaming. Electric car dying in the middle of nowhere and I freeze to death! Maybe don't bring 500,000 people a year to Canada and plant 500,000 trees instead. 🤔
ICE also don’t run at those temps, not without significant modifications. Most manufacturers recommend not starting when it’s -20C as major damage can be done to components, probably the fuel and oil pumps. For diesel, the fuel limits starts to above -9.5C. So you’d need battery, engine block, oil and fuel system heaters (all which need an energy source when the vehicle itself isn’t running), as well as modify the fuel to have a much lower vaporization temperature, which reduces its energy density.
Cop 28 very good cop for oil and gas producer and export country . High level mathene emissions reduction carbonization furnace activate carbon charcoal production
University of cambridge and University of Amazon Peru Latin America city iquitos because they talk not about of the Inventory and technology and which is the consequences of life in The planet Earth
Just like the Paris Climate Agreement, this is probably going to be ignored. There is nothing much to transition to as current "Green Energy" is only 30% reliable.
@@AmonTheWitch How? Having food, heat or Transportation only 30% of the time & freezing, starving and being totally unable to get things 70% isn't affordable. It's suicidal. "Sticker Shock" and lack of reliability has been the greatest obstacle to adopting Green Energy. The build out will take 40-60 years to make it substantially supplemental.
What caused the five ice ages prior to mankind's evolution? It must have been something built into the cosmic rhythms of the earth in the universe because we were not even here then. We are in at about the ten thousandth year since the last ice age and like it or not will eventually have another ice age in its own cycle and time frame--we are now at the stage where the glaciers melt, the sea rises, humidity increases, the temperature is then cooled by the moisture in the atmosphere (the greenhouse gases are 99 percent water vapor) and the sixth ice age we have evidence of starting will begin. We will enter the cooling period that will present our world with fresh new glaciers. The people of the time will laugh no end at Greta and her accolades who should know better and marvel at the unscrupulous users of a natural cycle for political control and domination and the sheep who believe all the B.S. we are being force fed....
Amazing how easy it is to get an informed opinion stating exactly what you said. More than a few too. I have been saying the exact same thing. 1000 years from now people will be laughing at us like we laugh at people who believe the world is flat.
Overpopulation of sensitive areas and people having more children than they can support with fresh water and work is at issue, for sure. We can't support globalism until all nations have the capacity to provide for their own people and we are all on an equal footing economically otherwise whatever you want to call it we are re-creating colonialism. I believe the issue of Climate Control is the issue to cause the reluctant to move to Globalism before all areas of the earth are on an equal footing. This allows the leaders the opportunity to re-create class systems and to have power over populations, and to exploit those who are under-developed and then steal their resources to enrich the leaders. I don't think people will laugh at us any more than they laugh at Karl Marx today. Marx opposed the ruling class and its lies about the Divine Right of Kings and ascribing Gods will to maintaining slave/worker classes.
Can anyone relevant still afford propping up expensive fossil fuels in a pure tax budget sense of thing in Boomer demographics hittimg hard? The subsidies is one of tue few thing that can still be saved on to balance budgets.
We really need law and order and education to become civilized enough to work together without exploiting anyone. But it needs everyone to be able to contribute so that everyone has the self-respect of not being a burden to the whole.
@@AmonTheWitch we cant fully get rid of fossil fuel with our limited energy supply. but we have zero need for animal agriculture. also animals are victims of opression and is way more urgent to address that problem. also animal agriculture is far worse for the environment and use the majority of fossil fuel to transport animal feed, the animals and their dead bodies. long term both yes but animal ag needs to go asap
Outcomes? Foolishness & wastage of tax dollar. 😡
I'll believe it when I see it. Actions speak louder then words.
Right!! They all know how there is still 2-3 trillion dollars worth of easy extractible oil, gas and coal just sitting there. They'll stop when all that is gone
Fossil fuels can't be replaced completely... Thats the outcome of this meet...
Human kind is just confused. This is simply not possible. Imagine south America and Africa for example where darkness is common. This people haven't seen 24/7 of electricity and you want them to transit to renewable. This people dosent know what you actually meant. Please try to get informed. Big joke 😂😂
The meeting led by an oil tycoon whose power is based on selling fossil fuels decided that we should keep using fossil fuels, shocking.
While these conferences are needed, people put too much faith in just talk. Didn't a US presidential candidate just announce he is going to drill, drill, drill if elected? Addressing climate change can only be successfully done when the global community gets past all the coffee chat, and starts putting all the talk into action.
Are these conferences needed? Balance the carbon consumed in flying all these floaters to UAE for a week of cocktail parties and back slapping with what was actually accomplished.
This entire exercise amounts to nothing. India consumes approximately as much coal as the US and EU combined. China consumes four times that. China and India consume 62% of the world's coal. I don't see anyone bringing that up. That fact of the matter is: it's just a tax grab.
what are you on about. usa, eu companies make their products in these countries. Outsourcing pollution make usa, eu clean? On the other hand if you see per capita emission you will find different story.
@@nirajshrestha5621 62% is 62%
Anyone else see the irony of this COP28 conference being held in the middle of the desert in a country whose cities were built on the profits of oil
headed by the ceo of one of the world's largest oil companies that made a statement against the entire message of the conference just over a week prior to its commencement
Transition? Phasedown? But what are the specific numbers and limits and timeframe?
there aren't any. All just hot air
@@tvguy61 Nope, they're saying they hope to reach net zero in 2050, twenty years too late and still guzzling the whole time. The document isn't even worth its weight in toilet paper.
@@BlodhelmActually you are wrong about 20 years too late. Climate change will happen on a spectrum meaning that 4 degrees is worse than 3 is worse than 2 is worse than 1.5. If we can’t make 1.5 than we should limit to 2 if we can’t do that we should limit to 2.5. Every bit matters and every step is important. It is not toilet paper just because it doesn’t take the steps for a 1.5 degree pathway
this conference isnt even a greenwashing affair anymore, its a stage for the world's leaders to come together and strategise how to 'develop and expand' the fossil feul indistry globally. dont believe a world of th ebullshit spewed from the mouths of the ruling class, they want us dead.
Bravo! Now I can go to sleep peacefully. The world is saved.
Are you kidding. This must be a joke. Can we keep I touch to see that this was about a show. Let's see how the industrial nations will abide to this. Big joke
@@raymore5256I haven't laughed in a long time as sweetly as I did watching this video .
@@raymore5256 Whoosh.
How much redution each year --- 5% more double talk
If no obligations, it guarantees zero outcome. You may simply forget about this event as dummy empty place and time waste. Everybody will do what is profitable
DRILL BABY DRILL. WE ALL NEED FOSSIL FUELS. MUST HAVE FOSSIL FUELS.
Tell me you were put in special ed without telling me you were put in special ed
Not likely. How would they get to the next conference?
Short answer: No.
Big words. Really big. But we're looking for and seeking actions. Solid actions.
They Will need the population of the world to agree WE say NO!
Non binding 😂
If we are calling for the abolition of fossil fuels, what about alternative fuels? Without such suggestions, it is meaningless. Those who are engaged in such opposition activities must also be benefiting from fossil fuels. There is no point in calling for its abolition while enjoying the benefits of fossil fuel power generation and production.
Things like biofuels, hydrogen and even nuclear are being discussed in addition to the renewable options. Other technologies like Geothermal are rapidly evolving. The whole point is that there are alternative options that can be switched to with effort. We have benefited greatly from fossil fuels but continuing to use them will lead to our ruin and sooner rather than later at this point.
@@brynphillips9957 We all know that fossil fuel consumption is harmful to the global environment. However, the reason why companies do not switch from fossil fuels to alternative fuels is because fossil fuels are cheaper. Unless we solve this problem, we won't be able to phase out fossil fuels. No country wants to be poor, just like you don't want to be poor.
@@emeraldbreeze5204 Money won't matter much when we're all dead.
Save human kind first before talking about climate. Climate is here when you was born and it's going to remain here after your death.
non native speaker of English, troll.
There is no climate crisis
THIS MEANS NOTHING.
7:15 What kind of 'possible' is that..?
*_"If we all behave like angels tomorrow..."_*
What’s the alternative. Horse and cart and candles and sails
The real alternative is birth control so that we reduce the amount of people so that there is no negative impact on the world from people. And then we will still have an ice age when it is time in the cycle of the universe for Earth to ice over again and renew itself.
back to square 0...
Very reasonable outcome. The world depends on 100 million barrels per day for energy. It’s going to take time and money to replace that. ~26 years
there's billions of people, if we literally just expanded rail transport, banned private jets (main polluter) and made public transport free and accessible that would be cut in half in a year already
It is hard to convince those who's nations will effectively become non existant that this is a reasonable outcome.
We already have a tool to solve it - EVs.
@@brynphillips9957 Reasonable and practical.
I’m all for a transition to sustainable, renewable energy, except not really interested in living in a cave to make it happen this year.
Attacking the producers of the energy source we all currently depend on is ridiculous.
It involves no sacrifice. To make this transition successful, everyone has to significantly reduce their consumption of fossil fuel energy and transportation. This will effectively reduce the demand for fossil fuels and “back out” the need for them. This will require some sacrifice by all, it will cost a lot of money, and it will take time. This is reasonable and practical.
I look forward to hearing your practical ideas to accomplish this.
@@AmonTheWitch Public transport moves through areas that are dangerous to unarmed civilian citizens. Public transportation is not a solution as long as law and order locally and internationally is not maintained.
The eorld needs to transition combustion engine production
What is the point of signing agreements with China 🇨🇳?
- When was the last time China kept its promises or honored its signatures?
WOW... Have you seen how much renewables China actually uses? Here is the thing you forget about China. If you looked at all the things that you own or were made in China and then had it made in your country then your CO2 output would be higher.
Everyone shifted production to China and then they want to blame them for all the emissions, sadly that is not the full picture. If all these things produced were made in the country you live in they would cost 2x the amount or more and the CO2 as a total on the planet would not be that much lower.
You can't look at a country and celebrate how low its CO2 footprint is if they don't produce goods because it's BS as its Carbon is just pushed to another country that makes those goods. It would be like importing all your meats and exporting ALL your garbage and saying you have the lowest Methane footprint... all you did was hand it off to someone else.
@bookerful
30 minutes ago
Lake Maracaibo in Venezuela is the place on Earth that receives the most lightning strikes. Massive thunderstorms occur on 140-160 nights per year with an average of 28 lightning strikes per minute lasting up to 10 hours at a time. Grid will feed the EARTH-free clean energy for us all. FULMINOLOGY
To the now KING OF ENGLAND and ALL AT COP 28. FULMINOLOGY CLEAN FREE ENERGY HIDDEN IN ARCHIVES. Dear Prince Charles, Once upon a time, on 11th September 2004 to be exact, a Gran and Granddad were driving back from babysitting their grandchildren when all of a sudden Gran shouted: "WATCH OUT". Granddad was not looking where he was going and nearly crashed the van they were in. Granddad said he was "Sorry, and that he was put off his driving by something that caught his eye up in the sky" Granny looked up into the sky and asked "What is that?" Granddad stopped the van, and they both got out to look. "WOW," said Gran "WOW," said Granddad They were looking at a spaceship, huge, gigantic. Granddad said. "I could hit that with a catapult if I had one" Gran said. "Why doesn't it make a sound? Why are there small thundery clouds rushing inside it?" They watched the spacecraft for over Eight minutes, then it started to move slowly at first, then quite speedily. They jumped back in their van and followed it up the road till it went out of sight towards London. They never saw anyone, nor did they see any traffic pass them at that time. Gran and Granddad told their children and friends what they had seen, and most smiled and laughed at their story, mainly because the area in question has hundreds of cameras close by. If Gran and Granddad's story were true, then it would have surely been seen. Eleven years later on the anniversary of the sighting Granddad woke up early and told Gran he was going to visit the place at the exact time where they had seen the spaceship. Gran said, "Yes, go see if there's anything different?" Wow! He came back saying that the most unusual thing happened. This time there were planes in the sky, maybe four or five planes that he could see at any one time? He told Gran he saw crows flying and geese too, making sounds, Also Granddad counted the seconds for the next vehicle to pass by and could only reach 40 or so seconds then another vehicle would pass? Gran asked Granddad "What does this all mean?" Granddad said, "It means that the spaceship never got caught on cameras because it was speeding in some type of time tunnel,- a Bubble of some kind? and we both traveled in this phenomenon somehow?" "So why was the spaceship there?" said Gran, "So why were we allowed to see it? Was it the future? was it today's technology? Was the thundery rushing clouds on the inside of the Spaceship its camouflage or could it be how it was fuelled?" They have the exact time, the exact place. Surely this spaceship the size of Wembley Stadium would have left a trail somewhere? Somewhere on some radiation counters? Radar? Spectrometers?Gravitational Readings? Gran said, "All they need to do is investigate to find the answers?" Granddad sobbed and told Gran "That because of the size of the spaceship and no camera evidence, there was no way that this story would ever be believed? Because of how important this story is to mankind, and to the future I beg you all to tell your children in the hope that they find out how and why all this happened one day. yours sincerely Michael n Betty FULMINOLOGYTHE FUTURE SAVE THE PLANET
You can go ahead and invent how to capture lightening strikes and we will call you Thor.
how are we gonna collect the carbon tax dollars from the volcanoes? 260million tons of carbon a year from volcanoes thats a lot of revenue for the state!
We can't control volcanos, but man-made emissions can be controlled.
@@twistedyogert what about the activity on the sun? can you stop that??
1.5 was never possibleWe will never be possible
Good to hear that RENEWABLE ENERGY is on track. Slowly, changes will happen😊 Just ignore the ignorants, negative and closed minded people. Understand their capacities. No one is perfect guys😁 Most biased medias si also understandable, they are earning for negative thoughts😄
Say candace
Scam
Criminals
Not a chance fossil fuel will end. If you think that I am riding my bike at -35°C, you're dreaming. Electric car dying in the middle of nowhere and I freeze to death! Maybe don't bring 500,000 people a year to Canada and plant 500,000 trees instead. 🤔
Oulu, Finland is a bike friendly city. You're just making excuses.
ICE also don’t run at those temps, not without significant modifications.
Most manufacturers recommend not starting when it’s -20C as major damage can be done to components, probably the fuel and oil pumps. For diesel, the fuel limits starts to above -9.5C. So you’d need battery, engine block, oil and fuel system heaters (all which need an energy source when the vehicle itself isn’t running), as well as modify the fuel to have a much lower vaporization temperature, which reduces its energy density.
@@chow-chihuang4903 I have never heard of this what? -20 C is nothing, when its cold you just have to give your car a minute to warm up. EV or ICE.
@@johanness.9925 Uh, just Google it. We don’t have to get into an extended YT chain about it.
Cop 28 very good cop for oil and gas producer and export country . High level mathene emissions reduction carbonization furnace activate carbon charcoal production
University of cambridge and University of Amazon Peru Latin America city iquitos because they talk not about of the Inventory and technology and which is the consequences of life in The planet Earth
Just like the Paris Climate Agreement, this is probably going to be ignored. There is nothing much to transition to as current "Green Energy" is only 30% reliable.
wrong, it's cheaper than oil and gas
@@AmonTheWitch How? Having food, heat or Transportation only 30% of the time & freezing, starving and being totally unable to get things 70% isn't affordable. It's suicidal. "Sticker Shock" and lack of reliability has been the greatest obstacle to adopting Green Energy. The build out will take 40-60 years to make it substantially supplemental.
BUNK. @@AmonTheWitch
This makes me want to buy a new internal combustion powered vehicle with a big V-8 engine. Vroom, vroom! 😁
Wow
nothing as fragile as the masculinity of an American
if a little electric car is enough to turn you into a woman, you aren't man enough to change a tire
@@AmonTheWitch 😆🤣
Compensating for something? Do you know everyone is laughing at your fragile identity every time you drive down a road?
What caused the five ice ages prior to mankind's evolution? It must have been something built into the cosmic rhythms of the earth in the universe because we were not even here then. We are in at about the ten thousandth year since the last ice age and like it or not will eventually have another ice age in its own cycle and time frame--we are now at the stage where the glaciers melt, the sea rises, humidity increases, the temperature is then cooled by the moisture in the atmosphere (the greenhouse gases are 99 percent water vapor) and the sixth ice age we have evidence of starting will begin. We will enter the cooling period that will present our world with fresh new glaciers. The people of the time will laugh no end at Greta and her accolades who should know better and marvel at the unscrupulous users of a natural cycle for political control and domination and the sheep who believe all the B.S. we are being force fed....
Amazing how easy it is to get an informed opinion stating exactly what you said. More than a few too.
I have been saying the exact same thing. 1000 years from now people will be laughing at us like we laugh at people who believe the world is flat.
Overpopulation of sensitive areas and people having more children than they can support with fresh water and work is at issue, for sure. We can't support globalism until all nations have the capacity to provide for their own people and we are all on an equal footing economically otherwise whatever you want to call it we are re-creating colonialism. I believe the issue of Climate Control is the issue to cause the reluctant to move to Globalism before all areas of the earth are on an equal footing. This allows the leaders the opportunity to re-create class systems and to have power over populations, and to exploit those who are under-developed and then steal their resources to enrich the leaders. I don't think people will laugh at us any more than they laugh at Karl Marx today. Marx opposed the ruling class and its lies about the Divine Right of Kings and ascribing Gods will to maintaining slave/worker classes.
P
Can anyone relevant still afford propping up expensive fossil fuels in a pure tax budget sense of thing in Boomer demographics hittimg hard? The subsidies is one of tue few thing that can still be saved on to balance budgets.
non native speaker of English, troll.
Mankind has agreed to enter a new dark age. So sad.
We really need law and order and education to become civilized enough to work together without exploiting anyone. But it needs everyone to be able to contribute so that everyone has the self-respect of not being a burden to the whole.
it should be the end of animal agriculture, not fossil
why not both
@@AmonTheWitch we cant fully get rid of fossil fuel with our limited energy supply. but we have zero need for animal agriculture. also animals are victims of opression and is way more urgent to address that problem. also animal agriculture is far worse for the environment and use the majority of fossil fuel to transport animal feed, the animals and their dead bodies. long term both yes but animal ag needs to go asap
Finally positive outcome thanks UAE
wow you get duped rather easily.