Pulsar Axion XQ38 vs Helion 2 XQ38F | Optics Trade Debates

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 9 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 5

  • @marcingrabus6747
    @marcingrabus6747 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks Guys for a lot of really good reviews and honest opinions . Really helpful videos . All best in New year for all team members . Greetings from Poland and Darz Bór!

    • @OpticsTradeEU
      @OpticsTradeEU  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hello! We're glad you liked it! Thank you and we wish all the best in 2022 to you as well!

  • @henkono9510
    @henkono9510 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you have the choice between the Helion 2 XQ38F and the Axion XQ38 LRF including range finder for nearly same price, what would be your choice? (differences are clear: no wireless in LRF, no LRF in Helion 2, lower battery capacity in LRF), the technical data and picture quality should be nearly the same, right? Why is the Helion the working version / according to what spec / feature?

    • @electriceyeslide5959
      @electriceyeslide5959 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Absolutely the Helion 2 XQ38F. No comparison. These two usually get it right but they say a couple of things in this video that are incorrect. The detection range is the same between them. The Helion 2 is a professional device with additional features, better ergonomics, and reliability.

  • @electriceyeslide5959
    @electriceyeslide5959 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I disagree with your statement about detection range. Pulsar says it’s the same. 1350m to 1350m.
    The price is also about $2,567 euros for the Helion 2 XQ38. As in the US, they are $2999 everywhere online.
    The Helion 2 is a much better device and has additional capabilities not mentioned here.