Tascam DR-40X Review (Noise, Battery Life and more things tested!)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2024
  • The Tascam DR-40X is a four-track portable audio recorder with built-in stereo microphones.
    Amazon | Tascam DR-40X: amzn.to/3p0ZqFh *
    Support the channel on Patreon: / juliankrause **
    Affiliate links from which I receive a commission for sales. This doesn't generate any additional cost for you. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
    ** Patreon is a platform where you can voluntarily choose to support the channel by purchasing a monthly subscription.

ความคิดเห็น • 514

  • @JulianKrause
    @JulianKrause  5 ปีที่แล้ว +85

    Small correction: In the comparison, I meant to write and say Zoom H5 and not F5.
    And one more thing I want to point out: I verified the preamp noise of the DR-40X with two separate devices to eliminate the chance of testing a defective recorder.

    • @Mr_G
      @Mr_G 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Looks like they have changed only screen light from orange to blue in the DR40-X compare to previous DR40-V2. Can tell you though, that this device is very sturdy (it has metal reinforcements inside in right places), even it looks "cheap".

    • @JulianKrause
      @JulianKrause  5 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      ​@@Mr_G Good to know that there is some reinforcement in there. It really doesn't feel like it. I guess I have to incorporate drop tests into my future reviews :)

    • @Mr_G
      @Mr_G 5 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Drop tests - oh no!
      One of my professional hobby is to fix electronics - often after drop tests :)

    • @Xscrambler
      @Xscrambler 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hi Julian, thanks for the review. But, how's the audio playback quality versus a mid-range DAP?

    • @neptunevibe
      @neptunevibe 5 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      Hello Julian, and thank you for the great review. I'm planning to buy a cheap (under 200 Euro) recorder for ambient sound (so an A/B configuration would be preferable while the majority of them are X/Y and locked in place) and I was thinking to buy this one. However after watching your review I realized the background noise is too loud. Would you be nice to recommend me a good one? Low noise, enough fidelity. Thank you.

  • @technomadmn
    @technomadmn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +63

    This is how review should be made for most of us. Straight down to business with no flares, gimmicks etc. thank you!!!

  • @bulentkirschbaum820
    @bulentkirschbaum820 5 ปีที่แล้ว +279

    he never blinked!

    • @JulianKrause
      @JulianKrause  5 ปีที่แล้ว +69

      Found one at 8:09 ;)

    • @exefile6299
      @exefile6299 5 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Never notice till I read your comment, 😂

    • @coinhawk
      @coinhawk 5 ปีที่แล้ว +14

      He is a robot... completely digital humanoid... :)...

    • @julian-xd6iz
      @julian-xd6iz 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

      German engineering.

    • @ozzymorrison8628
      @ozzymorrison8628 4 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      What the F....this guy ain't human

  • @einsamerwanderer6641
    @einsamerwanderer6641 5 ปีที่แล้ว +65

    I've been using the DR-40 for +4 years. It's my No.1 choice for demoing and being creative, thanks to the great overdub / mix mode. The mics are not too brilliant or harsh, they have this slight warm touch*.
    From 2012 - 2015 I "worked" mostly with the DR-05, while also trying out the Boss BR-80 and ZOOM's multitrackers R8, R16 & R24 (I still use the R8 for demos, as audio interface & DAW controller).
    My first choice to grab was and still is the Tascam. I like the DR-40 a lot, but yet it's lights & shadows.I was looking forward to this upgrade, but there is rarely something new.
    What's NEW:
    - a slightly revised menu (EQ, Speaker & Level are now in a seperate ""E/A" folder)
    - Dictation Mode (well...)
    - USB Audio Interface
    - 16h battery running time instead of 17h (based on 4 years of using eneloops: 8h seems realistic)
    - That's it
    Still NOT CHANGED:
    - instead of the "play" button, the "Enter/Mark" button is in the middle
    - USB port not protected like the SD slot
    - display totally overloaded
    - display has still 1990's Game Boy graphics
    - I prefer a dial for adjusting the volume (like a good old Walkman)
    - Power Supply Status has only 3 bars. That's far too vague. 5 bars would be useful, an additional display in percent would be awesome
    - still not possible to change the brightness of the display, only contrast. That's ridiculous! Guys, every simple China-imported mp3 player has this function!
    - still not possible to disable the annoying "Change Mic directions?" popup in the system settings when adjusting the mic
    - NO accessories! Not even optional! No case, no sleeve, no bag - nothing! 10 years ago I bought a cheap Transcend mp3 player for like 40 EUR. It came with a silicon protection case, lanyard, USB cable, line cable, earbuds, 2 display protection sheets, software CD and a case. And you could even adjust the display brightness! 40 EUR! Shame on you, Tascam!
    Conclusion:
    If you need a great, simple recorder with brilliant mics for demoing: go fo the Tascam DR-05 V2.
    If you need additional features, like XLR, full 2-track recording, mixer and you can pass on Audio Interface: go for Tascam DR-40 V2.
    If you need all this AND an Audio Interface, you should rather check the ZOOM H4n Pro. It's in the same price range but it also has a Guitar Amp Simulation, Zoom G5n based Multi Effects, a Karaoke/Jam function and includes Steinberg Cubase LE & WaveLab LE Download licenses and a protective case
    *I recorded "Einsamer Wanderer (QuickShot Demo)" with the DR-05 (light reverb, intro & outro with Audacity) - check out on my channel if you like

    • @rarewavemusic
      @rarewavemusic 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I was concerned that I may have bought my H4n Pro too soon before seeing how the DR-40X fared, but based on Julian's great review and your helpful comment, I think I made the right choice. Thank you.

    • @theorist5497
      @theorist5497 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great info and thank you for providing it. Though I do have a question that you may be able to provide some clarity to...say I need a decent quality budget priced 4 track digital recorder along the lines of the H4n Pro or H5 functionally speaking, etc but have no need for included microphones. Just portable and somewhat clean preamps XLR, line in etc for field recording samples and creative noodling. Thanks for any insight you can provide - I feel like Im just wading through thick fog at this point. lol

    • @einsamerwanderer6641
      @einsamerwanderer6641 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@theorist5497 , thanks for your kind words.
      You are looking for a (portable) 4-track recorder with XLR and decent preamps, is that right?
      Unfortunately I'm not familiar with recorders less than 8 tracks. Over the years I've been working with all ZOOMs (R8, R16, R24) and the BOSS BR-80. You would not want the ZOOM R16 or R24, they're too big. The BOSS BR-80 might work for you. I remember it was built like a tank and was fun jamming around with this little thing. The downside is it has 1 Mic Line-in only (no XLR) and creating a multitrack recording was very very very complicated and confusing because you had to navigate with a tiny jog wheel.
      I always highly recommend the ZOOM R8. It's not that big as the R16 or R24 and it's definitely the best of the 3 models. You get 3 gears in one: portable recorder, audio interface, DAW controller. It's portable powered by 4 AAs (eneloops recommended), it has 2 Line/XLR combinations, fully adjustable drum machine with 5 different kits, very useful effects (R16 effects are more "Nintendo") and a line-in for a foot switch. This thing is really the heart of my bedroom studio. I use it for creating songs on the couch and as an interface when recording. Since it's also a DAW controller it makes working with (in my case) Cubase a little more comfortable. I bought it for about 220 EUR many years ago. The price is pending from 189 EUR up to 320 EUR. If you don't need it urgently wait for a good offer - I would not pay more than 245 EUR.
      Sorry I can't tell you more about field recorders - though I hope I could help you out a little.
      Cheers

    • @theorist5497
      @theorist5497 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@einsamerwanderer6641Thanks for the reply, I really appreciate the input. Yeah, 4 tracks would basically be my mininum, 6 or 8 is probably the sweet spot for it be useful to me for anything other than field recording. I'm not sure how I wasn't aware of the R8 - it looks quite nice. For some reason I was under the impression that the R16 was the lowest model they made - so that may be a really nice solution for me both portability wise and for being able to record my musical projects. Thanks again, you may have just made my day!

    • @dgunn9741
      @dgunn9741 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Idk if anybody will see this but what kind of SD card do I need for this because I have a mico SD card but it's say that the card does not work

  • @JazzRockFusionSynthesizerMusic
    @JazzRockFusionSynthesizerMusic 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I posted a lengthy comment here earlier pointing out some things about this device. Hopefully it won’t “disappear” or be deleted again. Yes, this item is plastic which reduces its cost and second, it reduces weight as it is a portable device. Yes it has an intolerable built-in background hiss or noise. Nothing you can change via the menu for recording settings will lessen the hiss. Also the device will amplify and record any user handling of device while recording. So it must be positioned on a vibration free surface or a tripod. An accessory kit is available to allow device to be mounted on a typical mic stand. Any outside recording of music or nature sound will require a good wind screen added over mics.
    Lastly, if you have a good audio editor with a noise reduction tool the be advised of this good information. After recording something with this device - open your recording in your audio editor. Select a non-music or non-vocals portion with the hiss/noise section, copy this section. Then open your noise reduction tool. Choose clipboard as the parameter for what to remove. Play your recording to see if hiss is gone. It will be. Then save the hiss-free recording. Yes, it is a workaround but if you want a hiss free recording, this is absolutely necessary with this device. Editing out the noise from a field recording will require you first record somewhere quiet, then save say 5 or 10 seconds worth to a “hiss/noise” audio file first. Make your field recording. Then open both field recording and the hiss/noise recording at the same time in your audio editor. Copy the noise sample. Then select your field recording. Open noise reduction tool. Choose clipboard as the parameter for the noise reduction to use. Apply and check your field recording. It will be artifact free. Save your cleaned up file. Extra steps yes but doable. If you already own this device this procedure will help out. If you find a used one of these in good condition and know how to use an audio editor - consider grabbing it - as other than the irksome hiss/noise issue - it’s an affordable, overall useful and lightweight digital recorder. 😎👍🎥

  • @Kevin-ib4gv
    @Kevin-ib4gv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +33

    Personally, I love the "Record" feature of not going directly into record mode, as you need to set levels before you record anyway, and if you REALLY want to jump right in and record, just press the record button twice quickly. Also, you must remember price point when reviewing these recorders, and Tascam does make more expensive recorders for more exacting professional applications. All in all, in my opinion, this is a very fine recorder for under $200.00.

    • @lennartgosman3640
      @lennartgosman3640 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is a horror system where you can miss the dubble tap or forget it. Stupid system.

    • @WEHAVETHISDREAM
      @WEHAVETHISDREAM ปีที่แล้ว

      Even if all companies have better recorders, they should put pre-amps and a/d d/a converters.
      That should be HIGH-CLASS.
      All other things (cheap plastic, buttons etc.) I don’t care about.

  • @zyzzyvacation
    @zyzzyvacation 4 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    3:20 On the inside of the battery compartment door there’s a special place to store the small rubber stand so you don’t end up losing it. Simply press the rubber piece between the 2 plastic stems on the inside of the door and when replaced the rubber stand will never get lost while stored between the batteries 🖐😉

    • @oprgraphicsllc8266
      @oprgraphicsllc8266 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also, if you want a snug fit in the tripod socket, just turn it clockwise a few times. All this said, a flip out stand or something that doesn't detach would be better and if done right, far less fiddly.
      It's overall a very good review. My nitpicks is that critiques and praises aren't given with any nod toward prices. Also, I thought the build quality felt fine for a $180 portable four channel recorder. Maybe the feel is different depending on whether you pick it up empty or with batteries. Weight subjectively suggest quality. (I've had cheap phones in the past that had a lead weight in the handset presumably at least partly to weight it down when they went with lighter weight speakers and microphones.)

    • @goldenlady8333
      @goldenlady8333 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thank you.

  • @curtisjudd
    @curtisjudd 5 ปีที่แล้ว +58

    Thanks for this, Julian.

  • @leswright4108
    @leswright4108 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I just got a FetHead Phantom today. I can confirm what you start--using the device easily improves the noise situation with my low sensitivity dynamic mics and the Behringer C-3, which is not terribly sensitive compared to other condensers. I am glad I got it and it will improve my experience with the DR40X and my other Tascam recorder. That said I have multiple uses for the FetHead beyond just lowering preamp noise on this device. I think someone starting clean is best to not worry about the FetHead and spend the extra money on a Zoom recorder with better preamps.

  • @drstew1
    @drstew1 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I’m so happy i bought this device already. Your description is interesting,personally any recording devise with XLR connections under 130.00 pounds is un heard of. I got virtually Binaural sound recorded with the Y configuration kept still outside a window. Playback you can hear the direction vehicles are driving in. Almost 3D sound. I prefer this to my sony linear PCM recorder

  • @olexandrkuzmenko4048
    @olexandrkuzmenko4048 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Thanks for a nice review. I have been wanted to buying used one, but change my mind after watching this review. You saved my money, because I planned to use recorder with dynamic mic. Thank you once again

  • @RobertLinthicum
    @RobertLinthicum 5 ปีที่แล้ว +19

    Another amazing contribution to TH-cam. Thanks for what you do, Julian!

  • @pdbordelon
    @pdbordelon 5 ปีที่แล้ว +13

    Which field recorder in the DR-40X's price range would you guys recommend if you plan to mostly use the built in mic to record band practice? Would you go with the DR-40X for that purpose or is there another make or model you would consider first? Thanks!

    • @phelyxz
      @phelyxz 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I wonder just the same. He says there are better alternatives but I wouldn't know which ones 🤔

  • @grandmasterjo1
    @grandmasterjo1 5 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Very nice presentation. I think English is not your first language but the clarity flow and content is excellent.
    Very mature voice and a job well done 👍

    • @leswright4108
      @leswright4108 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Like many educated Germans Julian actually speaks perfect English. Let's put it this way--he is much easier to understand in English than a certain US president ;)

  • @tbhv
    @tbhv 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    thanks for this wicked video- I have a dr40 and the noise floor is outrageous! I have been doing research to figure out if this normal for the system and I think your video totally confirms my belief. I guess I live and I learn haha

  • @bluplow
    @bluplow 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for this. I was looking to replace my DR-40 because it has a few issues and I just tested the noise level and it sounds pretty much like you just showed! So I'll keep looking. I may check to see if you have any reviews on good handhelds.

  • @ProSimex84
    @ProSimex84 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm gonna pick one up tomorrow used for $50, as I'm mostly going to use it to digitize music I record on reel to reel and 4 track cassette, it's perfect. The fa t that I can take it out and grab samples to feed into my sampler is just icing on the cake.

  • @alessandrolazzari7937
    @alessandrolazzari7937 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Not only great tech skill with lots of numbers and figures BUT also opinions based on fact check without any brand sponsorship. Well done! I'll always follow you review!

  • @omegapointil5741
    @omegapointil5741 5 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    You should be comparing noise levels of comparably priced models.

    • @shadowsilhouette8499
      @shadowsilhouette8499 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      I was about to leave this same response. Comparing a $100 recorder to a $700 one. You obviously get better quality when you pay more. They design their budget devices with this in mind. I have an even cheaper version, the DR-22 WL and I love it for its size and functions, even if limited. I just clean up the his in post, I mean I'm going to do that anyway.

    • @djinibee2435
      @djinibee2435 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@shadowsilhouette8499 The Zoom H5 (which is one of the recorders the Tascam is compared to) is not a $700 recorder, indeed it is only a bit more expensive than the Tascam. In fact, it is very important to be aware of the issue Julian points out because if you're recording, say, birdsong in the field, you may have difficulty finding a quiet enough spot to use as a basis for cleaning up the file in post.

    • @kbrocx
      @kbrocx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      ​@@djinibee2435 Current Amazon prices. DR 40x: $179 , Zoom H5 $279, F4 $444, F8 $849 SD MIX PRE-3 $680. There are other audio recorders in the Tascam's price range, but these are not them. As he mentioned you can add the Fathead Preamp ($99) and lower the dB by 22 decibels. Check his chart and see how that compares.

    • @GethinColes
      @GethinColes 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      I saw a TH-camr raving about the Roland r07. Have you seen it? Any other suggestions for around $200 US?

    • @sang3Eta
      @sang3Eta 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It didn't sound that noisy using the inbuilt mics just with the external dynamic mic.

  • @TheCameraManReviews
    @TheCameraManReviews 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Hi I am looking for a audio record to record ambient sounds, like birds, rivers, trees etc etc. would this be a good recorder for this?

  • @dhoneybeekingdom7889
    @dhoneybeekingdom7889 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi! Just a begginner here. I want to use this recorder to record nature sounds in quiet environments. I guess I will use the built-in mics. Would the noise you show in the video affect here? Or that noise only affects when you connect an external mic, like a dynamic one you mentioned?

  • @Rompler_Rocco
    @Rompler_Rocco ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you!! I nearly "upgraded" from my DR-40 assuming that _of course_ Tascam improved the preamps, how could they not?? 🤦‍♂️
    Also- I can't believe this channel escaped me until now! I know your name from all over the TH-cam audio community, and I see why. Glad to finally be subbed! 👍

  • @stephenlepage
    @stephenlepage ปีที่แล้ว

    Useful info. Did you test it as an interface with a computer? How did you go with Windows drivers?

  • @leswright4108
    @leswright4108 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I have come to trust Julian's scientific approach and objective measurements. That said I get much better quality out of this with a Behringer XM8500 dynamic mic than this review suggests I should. Perhaps my old ears and high frequency hearing loss mean I don't hear noise as much ;)
    My main gripe with the unit is that it's overdubbing and mixing capabilities take some time to sort out. You really need to download the full reference manual from Tascam. In short it isn't a four-track recorder in the more traditional sense as in my old Zoom H4. The process is basically overdub-bounce-overdub-bounce on track at a time. Workable, but different.
    I find the build quality is fine. The little rubber foot has a storage slot in the battery cover. And the Peak Reduction level control is very useful (there are other TH-cam videos that extol the virtues), but I agree that the Auto and Limiter level controls are not.
    Julian doesn't mention that you can power the thing through USB too using computer port, a standard phone charger, or and external battery pack.
    In brief I like it a bit better than Julian does. However, I am keen to invest in a fethead to see it I can improve the noise performance on this and other beloved recorders I have.

    • @JulianKrause
      @JulianKrause  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey, thank for sharing your experience with the DR-40X and the additional input!
      The reason you are much better off with the XM8500 is that it is a more sensitive microphone. Meaning, it delivers a stronger signal in comparision to many other dyanmic microphones and that's why you end up with less noise in your recording.

    • @leswright4108
      @leswright4108 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JulianKrause Thanks. A couple of other things you didn't touch on. I have been experimenting with the thing as a USB interface, and it is surprisingly good, especially when using the built in mics. My DAW is Cakewalk, and I do find it takes a lot of fiddling with the ASIO4All property settings to get down to 128kbps latency (I have a small slow laptop so I don't go lower), but it is possible. As for the internal mics, there seems to be a slight QC issue with mine. In the XY position the Y is turned in a little more than the X. This means the stereo balance seems to slightly favour the R channel when you speak or sing dead on. The average difference on the meters is only a couple of dB, and it should only be audible to obsessive audiophiles, but this device isn't cheap and I would expect this to be in better nick. Also, the sensitivity of the mic to plosives is a huge headache--a pop filter or windcover of fur or foam is an absolute must, especially if you use Peak Reduction, as I do, to manage the the gain. I still really like the thing, but I can't deny that the mic asymmetry, which I suspect does not affect every unit out there, is a tad annoying (even if it is easy to compensate for by positioning).

  • @ASMRLovebyT
    @ASMRLovebyT 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi Julian, this might be a silly question, but what does the USB Audio Interface in this device do? Why is it handy to buy this one instead of the dr-40? Thank you.

  • @thomasrenhult273
    @thomasrenhult273 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Finally someone who does reviews that are critical. What alternatives do you recommend? Are there any similar recorders in the same price range?

  • @LearnThaiRapidMethod
    @LearnThaiRapidMethod 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very informative review, Julian. Thank you.
    I had the DR-40, which got damaged so I've just ordered the DR-40X (same price). I didn't notice much of a floor noise before - at least not one that I couldn't easily remove in post.
    I'm not familiar with all the technicalities, so what I got is more by luck than judgement.
    I use this DVR with an LCT 640 condenser mic - so I'm not sure if the preamp noise issue is something I need to worry about.
    Could you please clarify this for me. I understood the the LCT mic has a built-in preamp (is that correct)? So do I simply disable the preamp in the Tascam (how do I do this)? Is this what the input gain is all about?
    I'm recording voiceover exclusively, so maybe none of this is relevant to me (just speak closer to the mic?)
    Alternatively, what do you suggest as a decent, inexpensive preamp for a condenser mic like the LCT?
    Or what do you suggest as a similar DVR like the Tascam in the same price range, but which doesn't have the problems you mentioned?
    :)

    • @LearnThaiRapidMethod
      @LearnThaiRapidMethod 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Well, I managed to cancel my order for the DR-40X and decided to go for the Zoom H4n Pro for an extra $30. I hope I made the right choice, but one reviewer did seem to think it had a lower noise floor, plus the button layout seems a bit more logical (you can quickly select any of the 4 input channels in any combination and the menu button is away on the side) but otherwise all the other features seem identical. The only difference being that the built-in mics are fixed in XY position, but you can adjust the directionality from 90 to 120 degrees. Thanks again :)

    • @JulianKrause
      @JulianKrause  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@LearnThaiRapidMethod Hey, I would have recommended you the H4n Pro as well. As far as I know, the preamps are the same as in the Zoom H5. You can hear the difference to the H5 in this video (I accidentally labeled the H5 as F5 at 6:47). With a Zoom H4n Pro in combination with your LCT 640 you can make very low noise recordings. Enjoy your new recorder!

    • @LearnThaiRapidMethod
      @LearnThaiRapidMethod 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@JulianKrause TY :)

    • @LearnThaiRapidMethod
      @LearnThaiRapidMethod 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JulianKrause Thank you. I've been working with the H4n Pro for a few days now and it's a great little device, solidly built, impressive internal mics (albeit super-sensitive to ambient noise) and low noise floor - esp. with my LCT640 XLR mic.

    • @JulianKrause
      @JulianKrause  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LearnThaiRapidMethod Great to hear! Btw. the preamp has nothing to do with how much ambient noise you pick up. That has to do with the mic you use. Be sure to get the mic close (about 8 inches) to your mouth to get the best sound quality possible.

  • @weeardguy
    @weeardguy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yes! This is a review. No stupid, annoying background-music, just a normal setup behind you.... I now own a DR-40, which has a an extremely annoying 'chirp' sound when using a phantom powered microphone. (which is basically a 'continuation' of the very bad helicopter sound many experienced back in the days and was eventually fixed by Tascam).
    Just tried to record a voice-over, when the chirp came on AGAIN. I was so fed up that I started looking for something different. As I can read and write with my Tascam DR-40, I thought of the DR-40X. But darn, no. This will not be my choice.
    About the plastic ;) My DR-40 has survived many accidental drops, including drops on the metal guards that protect the internal microphones. It has never failed to amaze me how sturdy this thing is built. The mic-guards aren't even bent!

  • @jazzvanravenswaay2696
    @jazzvanravenswaay2696 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great to see a more detailed review on this, thank you!

  • @VinylsFinal
    @VinylsFinal 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Great video. Thank you. I bought the DR-40X and very rarely use it. The reason to buy it was to spread the built-in mics, put it on a table in the centre of my music room, and face it towards my hifi speakers. This way, I assume it will record audio the way my speakers actually sound in person. I could take a line level out of my hifi system and directly plug it into the DR-40X but that would just give me a hi-res audio file on the SD card, right?. In order to share files with friends and family with music the way I hear it in my room, what best way would you suggest? I have 4 different pairs of speakers, and I want to share how they all differently sound while playing the same music from the same source. Your thoughts on this will be greatly appreciated. Thanks.

  • @kbruff2010
    @kbruff2010 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you for this video. Have you considered the following: 01) Simple button layout 02) quality of speaker on rear 03) weight 04) low cost 05) accessory options. I think for the cost window this recorder it the best - but it works out ok.

  • @TheBadRabbitMedia
    @TheBadRabbitMedia 4 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Thanks for your test, the noise level is so bad to buy!

  • @audiotango
    @audiotango 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I could listen to you for hours! Great job!

  • @jamesgrellier4750
    @jamesgrellier4750 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Exceptionally clear and useful video. Thank you so much for putting the time in to this. I think you saved me some money and a lot of time getting frustrated with this machine, which I was close to buying.

  • @howardanderson3061
    @howardanderson3061 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Excellent review, I just bought one on line but maybe I'll send it back for something else. I did not like the fact of the noisy preamps, I agree that in 2019, a noisy preamp is not OK. And for God's sake this is TASCAM, Really, Say what? this is not OK! Thanx for your candid review

  • @judaismopractico1542
    @judaismopractico1542 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Which alternative would you like me to buy???

  • @DagAreHalland
    @DagAreHalland ปีที่แล้ว

    Incredible review! Holy ****. You should create a course to teach people how to create a review. 11/10!

  • @RonaldSuper7
    @RonaldSuper7 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great review !!! You highlighted all the points that we should know about. That rubber back piece leveler thing is ridiculous. It shows that they did care enough to improve this product so we should not either. Thanks for the your time and expertise....

  • @Stbnfr
    @Stbnfr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Al right I personally think that THIS is a review.
    Thanks.

  • @garypranzo9334
    @garypranzo9334 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Got a DR40 in 2015 and never looked back. I do not shoot 1 second of video without it also recording. This does not seem like a big upgrade

  • @DavePawson
    @DavePawson 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    You do not say which are the better alternatives, but thanks, a detailed and factual review.

  • @GregorMima
    @GregorMima 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ive been using the DR40 for years, still works like on day 1, and still has the noise you describe ... you need hotter mics for it (been using it with AudioTechnica). Seems the only added feature is the usage as USB sound device on Mac/PC ... Reason why i bought it back in the day: the Zooms had even worst noise floor (and dont check the crap frequency response) and you could use it with external USB batteries. And ofc around 160€ it was cheap. And even after all these years of "abuse" - even it may feel cheap - never was broken, always worked. Yeah i agree 2020 the DR40II perfomance is not acceptable anymore.

  • @ChillTube2010
    @ChillTube2010 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A great honest review, thanks Julian 😎🎙️🔊

  • @waltersmetak
    @waltersmetak 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Woe! Exceptional review! Really unfortunate not catching this before getting a DR 40......

  • @StarOasis26
    @StarOasis26 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you insightful comparison. I'm recording crickets and other ambient bugs. what's the best low self-noise recorders out there?

  • @theartoflivingoutloud888
    @theartoflivingoutloud888 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is a better alternative? Great video by the way.

    • @Huelogy
      @Huelogy 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Zoom h4n or H5.

  • @annoybot
    @annoybot 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thank you for the fantastic review - returned my unopened DR-40X and got the Zoom H5. So glad.

  • @daflehrernetzwerk2379
    @daflehrernetzwerk2379 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanx for this video, is it possible to use the DR-40 for a webinar as a regular audio interface by connecting it to the Notebook?

    • @kenwittlief255
      @kenwittlief255 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Only with the DR-40X, not the older DR-40 with the yellow display

  • @jialunluo769
    @jialunluo769 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for the review! So... at the price of $170, is it a good value? Or should one buy the more expensive (by $50) H4n pro instead? (Edit: My main use case is recording piano concerts where there will likely be very quiet passages; I would like to have the audio interface feature so I can hook it up to a computer)

    • @p11-w1x
      @p11-w1x ปีที่แล้ว

      im also interested in the answer of this question!

  • @JeffMusicFL
    @JeffMusicFL 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hello Julian! Thank you for the video! I was starting to consider the DR-40x but was dissapointed by the noise level... If I'm going to be limited to the built-in microphones in order to avoid noise, than I guess it makes more sense to look at the Tascam DR-05x or the Zoom H1n... Do you have a suggestion between those two or in general? I'm looking to spend around $100 - $200... It's for recording the audio in my rock band's rehearsals. The DR-05x seems to have more features than the H1n so I'm not sure. Thanks again!

    • @JulianKrause
      @JulianKrause  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey, if you only need the built in mics the DR-05X or a Zoom H1n would be a good choice. I haven't had a chance to test the DR-05X, so I can't really compare it to the Zoom H1n. If the DR-05X has a special feature you need, then I would go for that device. But other than that, I would buy the cheaper one. I have the feeling that the audio quality of the built-in mics is not too different.

  • @tomexistsonline
    @tomexistsonline 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I'm glad you posted about the noise levels. I've got a DR-07X and am trying to record two lav mics but, for a podcast, it's just untenable. A HORRIBLE noise level. I need to find a new recorder ...

  • @wooster7571
    @wooster7571 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Julian. This is a great video. Thank you. You mentioned some other recorders at this position in the market which were better choices. Please would you recommend one for me. I'm looking for one that will record outdoor sounds of nature at a reasonable level? Thank you.

  • @evolvingevrday
    @evolvingevrday ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Julian, I am thinking about getting the portacapture x8 but 'heard' the mics and more importantly, the XLR amps are not clean. Even with 32 bit float, I have heard the ein is not 120> as they claim. Have you tested this? I believe you have tested a Zoom 32 bit device in the past. May you let me know how they compare? Thank you

  • @MarkoAssi_pokervlogger
    @MarkoAssi_pokervlogger ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Julian what audio recorder by Zoom or Tascam will you recommend? That you are impressed with.

  • @WEHAVETHISDREAM
    @WEHAVETHISDREAM ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks, man!
    Best audio reviewer / tester ever!

  • @UncleAwesomeRetro
    @UncleAwesomeRetro 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi. Thanks for this review. I was considering this recorder, but now, I am not sure. I need an external recorder with at least two inputs, and I don't have any xlr microphones. I have a lavalier microphone and a røde video mic pro +. Could you recommend another recorder with less noise?

  • @nektardymski6025
    @nektardymski6025 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Julian! Great and detailed review. Really enjoying your content. Thanks!

  • @ampmmbe1590
    @ampmmbe1590 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I just purchased this unit before seeing and hearing this honest review. I will need to get a FetHead now. Which one is it? And is there a condenser microphone you would recommend for podcasts and utube?
    Many thanks

  • @zencoatlrios2648
    @zencoatlrios2648 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Damn thats a lot of noise! Thx for the review!

  • @Kaykonvo
    @Kaykonvo 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Is there an audio recorder you would recommend the tascam or zoom h4n

  • @VideoVakwerk
    @VideoVakwerk 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for your clear and very detailed review!

  • @revmatchtv
    @revmatchtv 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Very nice review! I picked up one of these and I found it extremely complicated to use, the menus are a disaster. The buttons are very stiff and runresponsive to move through the menus.

  • @whiskeyweekly7533
    @whiskeyweekly7533 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I use an SM57 for spoken word on this recorder. With a FETHEAD, I have very little noise. Great review!

  • @soundreamerbg
    @soundreamerbg 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Any observations on the noise when using condenser microphones with external phantom power? Is it any different if the tascam dr-40x's phantom power is off?

  • @IV0IV0IV0
    @IV0IV0IV0 5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Good review. I came to the very same conclusion after testing this device for a couple of weeks. The build in mic-pre-amps - for the use of external mics do have a very high self noise. The build-in mics are good, but very sensitive to wind-noise. Last but not least: the limiter function is useless because it's digital (meaning that it has to lower the total input first - which introduces extra noise). Next to this all, the recorder is very sensitive to RF-noise when using the build-in mics. Using a mobile phone in 1 meter from the unit, or standing in a ~50 meter range of a provider-antenna ruins your recording. That is unacceptable in my opinion.

    • @JulianKrause
      @JulianKrause  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I haven't had any RF problems so far but good to know. Thanks for sharing your experience with the DR-40X!

    • @AfroGelXT
      @AfroGelXT 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      do you ever have this RF issue with external mics plugged in?

    • @IV0IV0IV0
      @IV0IV0IV0 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@AfroGelXT I have never tested that and therefore I cannot answer your question I am afraid. But now that I am here, the reliability of the unit seems fine. At this moment, and 3 years later, I am still using the Tascam. Now mainly as a back-up recorder while using the line-input XRLs. The sound quality is all right, but nothing to write home about. Still a wonderful recorder if you don't want to lose a special moment (and are using a reliable SD-card of couse). The unit itself had never let me down.

    • @AfroGelXT
      @AfroGelXT 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@IV0IV0IV0 thanks!

  • @theguitarist1977
    @theguitarist1977 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very informative video specially on the noise floor. So which recorder model would you recommend please? This is my criteria:
    - have xy and ab configuration
    - can support adding 2 external condenser mics
    - can be used as an interface and connected to PC for either broadcasting and recording
    - decent low noise
    - budget up to $300
    Thanks a lot

  • @HeedyeKoren
    @HeedyeKoren 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Julian, thumbs up for the video. Surly opened my eyes.
    I bought the DR-40 Linear PCM Recorder (EIN: -108.3 dBu) 8 years ago and was thinking to use a Cloudlifter to cut roughly 25 DB in order to record vocals for a song. Still, if an acceptable noise floor is -65db or lower, it might not suffice. Can you share your thoughts in this regard?
    Tnx
    Dav

  • @jammin023
    @jammin023 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks for this comprehensive review. I agree with you that having so much pre-amp noise is simply unacceptable in this day and age. Not being able to individually switch phantom power is also a dealbreaker, it's surely not uncommon to want to record from both condenser and dynamic mics simultaneously.

    • @gotopcpanik
      @gotopcpanik 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dynamic microphones have no problem with phantom power.You can turn it on without any damage. Under no circumstances should you turn on phantom power for ribbon microphones. This destroys them.

  • @carlosp.1846
    @carlosp.1846 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for this unbiased review

  • @TAILORmoves
    @TAILORmoves 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey Julian, danke für diese tolle, detailsreiche Produktschau. Ich nutze Zoom H4N und verzweifele an der manuellen Eingabe der Namen für die Tracks. Kann da TASCAM Vorteile bringen? Zum Beispiel mit einer Taste verfügbares Leerzeichen oder Umschalten zwischen groß/klein/Zahlen?

  • @MichaelWynneCAS
    @MichaelWynneCAS 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent detailed review Julian!

  • @YoussefHallouly
    @YoussefHallouly 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Julian, have you ever tested the zoom H4n pro i would like to know how it compares to the tascam dr40x

  • @AnuBaburajan
    @AnuBaburajan 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent review. Which one do you recommend as a portable audio recorder with all these options, but better quality.

    • @JulianKrause
      @JulianKrause  5 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Hey, if you only need the internal mics to record sound, the Zoom H1n or Tascam DR-05X will be cheaper and do the job just as well. If you additionally need XLR recording capabilities, the Zoom H4n Pro is about the same price as the DR-40X but has much better preamps. And if you can spend a little more, the Zoom H5 will provide a better usability with its rotatable gain knobs.

    • @AnuBaburajan
      @AnuBaburajan 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@JulianKrause Thank you for your reply. Regarding H1N & DR-05X which one is better.

  • @mikaelseguin-cadiche4036
    @mikaelseguin-cadiche4036 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thanks Julian for the review very good job!! Could you please tell me witch pop filter you're using? Thanks ;)

  • @dat_chip
    @dat_chip 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    A thorough review, and I really agree that the level meters should always be visible, and that it might as well go straight into record mode. The "armed" mode made a lot of sense on tape machines, but I don't think this device uses tape reels inside. ;)
    I also agree that the limiters being digital do not make sense.

  • @TaedeMathis
    @TaedeMathis 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello Julia, Would you recommend the Tascam if I am going to use my Fethead with it? I am using the DR-60D Markii and love the ability to record a safety track. After visiting my local store, the Zoom H4n Pro rubberized material looked bad and the H5 felt sticky and looked absolutely horrible. The sales person has the H5 and wears gloves in the summer when using it because of the stickiness, this is an issue they need to address. Of course, sound quality is the most important feature so if using the Fethead would make it a draw between these devices in terms of sound quality I would go with the Tascam first, if not the H4n Pro. I love watching your videos, they are very helpful and informative.

    • @JulianKrause
      @JulianKrause  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hey, yes a FetHead will lower the peramp noise considerably. The DR-40X can give you a very good audio quality in combination with a FetHead.

  • @shannonc8759
    @shannonc8759 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    what level mode would you recommend for recording motorcycle sounds since the range of volume varies so much?

  • @westralianoffroad
    @westralianoffroad 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I’ve just fired mine up for the first time with a dynamic mic, and I’m disappointed to hear so much noise coming through. I’m so glad to have found this video because now I know why. Unfortunately, the Tascam DR-40 is not for me.

  • @elModo7
    @elModo7 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    *Subscribed*
    Been whatching your videos for a while now and I just got a DR05 v2 over the X version (here is a 50-55€ difference for the better screen and the usb interface).
    Since the preamps are the same I'm glad I didn't dish out the other 50€, maybe next time if I need XLR I may get a different brand or a DR-70D.

  • @Brani1974
    @Brani1974 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Excellent review thank you. Have you found a better alternative especially in regards to a better noise floor?? Thank you

    • @JulianKrause
      @JulianKrause  5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Zoom H4n PRO. Similar price, much better preamps.

  • @spritual_enlightenment
    @spritual_enlightenment 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    First time seeing your video. Glad to do that!

  • @JGlassy
    @JGlassy 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great review. I sure hope Tascam is listening to this one.

  • @TonyBabarino
    @TonyBabarino 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Excellent review! Subscription earned! 👍

    • @TonyBabarino
      @TonyBabarino 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Make more videos faster! 👍👍👍😀

  • @ttian2
    @ttian2 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    I appreciate this review and this brings up old nightmare about the DR-40 and Zoom H4n original... They were so similar: EIN of around -108dBu, max gain amount around 45dB, clickly buttons for gain control, and shared headphone/line out port. And bad headphone amp. Forget about driving a dynamic mic, just take Rode NTG2 for an example (-36dBV/Pa @1kHz), the noise produced by H4n and DR-40 still haunt me today. IMO the original H4n and DR-40 get a pass for their age, and Zoom did improve the game on H4nPro in 2016. Tascam c'mon, the DR-40x in 2019 with virtually no audio improvement over the original version? What is this? Anyway, thank you for this video. Not sure why it got so many dislikes compared to your other videos.

    • @JulianKrause
      @JulianKrause  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      You are right, testing the DR-40X I felt like back in the times when the preamps even introduced noise to recordings with condenser mics.
      Oh, and the dislikes come from someone who dislike botted the video. Seems like I hurt someones feelings with an honest review...

  • @nottingham_ChrisAllison
    @nottingham_ChrisAllison 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Julian.. I've done nearly all my recording so far on the slightly older dr-40.. I have to say I'm really impressed with it (for it's price point).. although now I'm getting into recording a little more I really wish I'd bought the DR-100 MKIII ..

  • @metal571
    @metal571 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I really wonder if even the Zoom H1 has a better SNR than this thing, hah. I got one of those before the AntLion XLR to 3.5mm adapter existed, which allows you to use a plug-in power of 5V converted from 48V directly into an XLR interface.

  • @1428MediaInc
    @1428MediaInc 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent review my friend! I have to say... i´m gonna buy this recorder, but right after your impressions... i´ll buy a Zoom instead

  • @Niyke
    @Niyke ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Julian, are you familiar with the Marantz PMD-661, if so what are your thoughts on it?

  • @silviowebdesign
    @silviowebdesign 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Hello, this voice recorder doesn't make any "white noise" as background? The sound is really clea, or you edited the audio? I'm thinking about buying one Tascam Dr-40...

  • @iancraig
    @iancraig 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Julian, do you know of any source for Frequency responses of the MICROPHONES and not the machines? I’m looking for info on a few ... Zoom H1n and H4n, also for Tascam Dr05 and DR40. These companies are all very quick to print the ruler flat response of the recorders but not the mics!
    With regards to noise, I generally use a Fethead anyway, but I’ve not noticed it being too bad on the DR40: probably because mic or ambient noise is worse! DR05 noise floor is around -92dB I think so that’s not particularly quiet either. The Zoom H4n seems significantly quieter to me than the Tascams though.
    The double hit on record is similar to the Zoom H4n as well I think. The H1n gives a permanent display of recording level while on though, unless you’re in ‘play’ mode.
    I recently used a Tascam DR100 and that seemed ‘black hole’ quiet so it seems you get what you pay for in this case perhaps.

    • @JulianKrause
      @JulianKrause  5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hey, I haven't seen any proper frequency response graphs of the built-in mics on these audio devices. I measured the H1n myself here: th-cam.com/video/ElMPECqumB8/w-d-xo.html
      The DR-40X will also have some kind of boost in the higher frequencies, by the sound of it. And this seems to be a trend with all the built-in mics on audio recorders.
      As far as I know, the Zoom H4n PRO has the same preamps as the H5, so that would be a step up from the DR-40X. I personally haven’t tested the DR-100MKIII but I have seen a measurement, where it had an EIN of -126dBu(A). That's pretty low noise and would line up with your experience.

  • @vyoufinder
    @vyoufinder 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video made me cancel an order for DR-40x and instead ordered DR-70D. The preamps in the 70D are phenomenal and it has 4 xlr inputs, plus one stereo 1/8". I don't think I'll need to upgrade again.

  • @Solstice42
    @Solstice42 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I had similar bad experience recently with the DR-07X, except it was worse because it picked up cell phone RF noise :( right in the middle of my recording of a concert. I would love to see a test of these devices that tested against RF interference - in a public venue you cannot control for people having cell phones. There seems to be no protection - I had less interference from my Zoom H4n, but there was still some. Have not tested my Tascam DR70D for noice. Can others post on this modern recordist challenge?

    • @AfroGelXT
      @AfroGelXT 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you ever have the same issue with an external mic plugged in?

  • @thebusinessfirm9862
    @thebusinessfirm9862 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fabulous review, mate.

  • @liquidcrystalvision
    @liquidcrystalvision 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    super nice review. thanks

  • @gillesmatheronpro
    @gillesmatheronpro 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    This is great work !!! Bravo.
    What with those "Dislike" people, what's wrong with you ??? You'd better give him applause for his work, and criticize Tascam for their poor product quality... NOT the other way round (which you did) you dumb !
    This "evolution" really is disappointing from a brand with such huge R&D capabilities. They could have offered a DR-41 (or else) with the specifications pros are really in need for, when it comes to super-compact recorder... not a twin of what already exists with minor improvements. And the look of a 1990s pocket game console. When I look at the screen, it reminds me of those gaming sessions we had... all flocked on the sofa like seagulls, just to try and see what was happening on the minuscule display. It's 25 years later, but Tascam surely has some kind of nostalgic engineers in their ranks !
    Tascam... give us screens, not backlit stamps !!! On each side of the device, you have about 1 cm between the actual edge of the display and the flanges of the body. Taking 'a few of this unused space for a wider screen : idea of the year (if you read this Mr Tascam).
    Once again... thank you Julian, you saved us (me included) lots of money with your work ! You should apply for a position at Tascam R&D departement ! ^_^

    • @dollhausenx
      @dollhausenx 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Probably because it's misleading to compare a $200 recorder to recorders costing far more. Plus it's utter BS to plug the Shure SM7B into this recorder. You don't buy a cheap Tascam to use that microphone. I have a Sound Devices MixPre3 and I have to use a Cloudlifter with that mic. This review would carry more weight if he had made it more about the difference between the $300 Zoom H5 and the $200 Tascam DR-40x. Then it would be a matter of, "do you want to pay the extra $100?" The noise level was closer between those two units. I have to laugh when he's beating up the Tascam for build quality. Wotta joke at $200! The noise floor complaint (especially old vs new) was the most valid part of the review. Too bad he didn't compare the Zoom H4n Pro. That's really the direct comparison Zoom and Tascam.

    • @gillesmatheronpro
      @gillesmatheronpro 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dollhausenx recently used the H4nPRO for live theatre caption. Was asked last minute, and had nothing available as multitrack... so borrowed that. Thankfully the thing was loud, and I got saved. This recorder also has a bad noisefloor.
      That alone keeps me away from buying ANY recorder at all. We're 2020, can't these guys offer clean preamps ? Not rocket-science level... just decently clean.
      What's the point in having fancy spec-list if first-of-first is not checked, and the raw tracks sound worse than 2000' DATs ones ?
      I hear what you point, but we need clean sound first... not second. Who can spend hours at the keyboard, just for cleaning and improving their tracks ?
      Well, for some weeks/months, we may have spare time inside... but its another story. ✋😏
      He pushed the thing a tad, to see if it could handle pro gear... because Tascam claim it can. He took Tascam pretentions to the first degree... because these guys trade (our) money for (their) words.
      It's short on noisefloor, it's short on speclist compliance, it's short on delivering pro quality... enough known.
      They have the skills for a generation 3 with decent preamp stages... let's see ! 😇

  • @MichaelDooney
    @MichaelDooney 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Recently picked up two Fethead's for my DR-40 and wish I had years ago. Input volume without was around 80-90 whereas with the Fethead's it's down to 10, virtually eliminating the noise floor.

  • @Henry-vr6zr
    @Henry-vr6zr 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Nobody:
    Asmr TH-camrs: *ILL TAKE YOUR ENTIRE STOCK*

    • @reinulf656
      @reinulf656 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Asmr youtubers... And 5 years ago we thought influencers and binge eaters were the pinnacle.

  • @kristallee5323
    @kristallee5323 5 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I love my dr-40x it works way better than my focusrite interface

    • @beatsaway
      @beatsaway 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      how? i plugged it into mac but its not detected?

    • @Altohamy
      @Altohamy 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      why better than focusrite?

  • @RedBearAK
    @RedBearAK 5 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Wow, the noise floor is so bad with the dynamic that I can even hear it through my iPhone speaker. Such strange design choices for a device that has to compete with a Zoom H5 or a MixPre-3 in today’s market. MixPres have analog limiters, Zoom F8n has advanced hybrid digital limiters. Both are highly effective compared to these useless limiters that just drop the recording gain. A very disappointing 2019 product indeed. I was expecting so much more from a new Tascam device. Excellent honest review.

    • @videodude5337
      @videodude5337 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      RedBearAK I bought a dr40 and the noise is just awful. Almost as it is louder than the Shure SM58 signal itself.

    • @sirchivo4725
      @sirchivo4725 5 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You can make any device sound bad (noise floor is so bad) if you aren't audio savvy and don't understand gain structure which is obviously the case here.

    • @davidariza2320
      @davidariza2320 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sir Chivo so his review is wrong?

    • @TheWushuliu
      @TheWushuliu 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Dr40X does not compete with the H5. Julian's comparisons are slightly misleading in this respect. The 40X is $100 cheaper, at least in the US. Which means its a competitor to the H4N - which has the same poor noise performance as the 40 and 40X, etc...

  • @hardcorehouse
    @hardcorehouse 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Excellent presentation and information, thanks.