ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ส.ค. 2024
- Hey Everyone, StraightA, Dawson here! Sit back, relax, and enjoy the content.
If there's anything you want to see covered on this channel, leave a comment down below to let me know!
Join me in Analyzing the Carolina Panthers for the 2024 NFL Season!
For business inquiries, please email me at: straighta057@gmail.com
Twitch: Straight_A_Gaming
Other Channels:
StraightAGaming: / @straightagaming2419
StraightAMagic: / @straightamagic
StraightAReacts: / @straightareacts
So a top 10 guard duo in the league gives up 60+ sacks?
Considering they let up easily 60+ last year, I’m going to go with more likely than not, but it’s possibly they improve!
This is the first video of yours I've ever seen & as a former coach, trainer etc. I have to ask wtf are you _doing?_ You're flailing like someone in an ad for that data service who's trapped in the ball pit they turn their cubicle into. If you're trying to figure out the '24 Panthers by referring to D.J. Moore & CMC having played there you Have A Problem. If you don't have a clue what the new rookies or coaches bring, why would I or anyone else watch this? Sorry to be so harsh, but really, what would Anyone Learn from listening to this?
I honestly have nothing else to say.
Hey! I appreciate your comment and sharing your feedback with me. I’m sorry you didn’t enjoy or get anything out of the video. That’s not my aim at all. I am still constantly learning the best way to make content and how to approach videos like this.
Is this the best way to approach this? Maybe not, but that’s why I do it, so I can learn how to be better with my schedule I have. I do it this way because more times than not, team outcomes follow trends and context. I provided the last 4 years, the talent currently rostered, and I make predictions and give information based on that information. If you notice when I talk about this current team, it’s not with the expectations of CMC or Moore, it’s noting past strategies and what this team might accomplish. If I expected the team to operate like it did with CMC, my prediction would be different.
I do try to balance Entertainment and Information, and as a result, sometimes I lack enough of either. So I really appreciate comments like this so I can improve. Though I will say, I am still proud of this content and what it provides because it’s transparent and based on data instead of solely gut feeling. Most predictions I see don’t take into account what stats actually happen in the league and gives everyone a realistic across the board perspective. I hope this helps enlighten you as much as your comment helps me.
You might enjoy some of the other teams in the series because it does focus on teams who haven’t really changed as much. Though you might not want to watch the bears one!
@@StraightAMain Glad you took it as it was meant. I ask content creators to put themselves in the place of the listener (since there is basically no real video we need to look at here). I'm the angry audience wondering "why tf is he rambling about..." So I'll check out other vids. If there are differences I'll mention 'em.
Of course, any feedback is welcome. Though the phrase “no real video” is quite untrue given the historical data and facts behind it.
Also I have to ask, if it was just my predictions, would that make it a video? Because that is what a lot of other content creators do, but I don’t see that being inherently good content. I at least wanted to be different and provide historical data based on previous season stats.
But maybe that’s because the video content needs different format, what would you recommend?
@@StraightAMain Damn. I shouldn't write when I'm tired. I just didn't feel that running through the stats was any use outside of context. I'll give you an extreme example. some guy took the time to isolate what two QBs do, footwork, looking off defenders etc. _before_ either play-calling or lack of on-field talent destroy a play.
As most people thought in the preseason, Bryce Young & C.J. Stroud may as well be clones of each other. If you blurred their figures so you couldn't see their uniforms, you wouldn't know which you were looking at.
So the stats you showed are bereft of any such context. Again, this added to the feeling that you don't _really have_ a sense of what you're covering. You have the basic idea of what you *want* to cover. but the _way_ you;'re doing it doesn't seem to accomplish it.
It also feels like reading a list. If you _don't know_ if the lack of on-field talent was a factor, then why even bring the stats up? You see? you Brought The Stats Up, then even you yourself questioned if they meant anything. That added to the feeling of you flailing. Yeah, it was there, we had to read it. But again, No Context & you yourself didn't give the feeling you knew what those stats meant.